Skip to main content
Access Microbiology logoLink to Access Microbiology
. 2021 Sep 13;3(9):000264. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000264

Streptococcus lutetiensis neonatal meningitis with empyema

Allen T Yu 1, Kate Shapiro 2, Christy A Beneri 2, Lisa S Wilks-Gallo 2,*
PMCID: PMC8549384  PMID: 34712909

Abstract

Streptococcus lutetiensis has been known to cause sepsis in adults, but only one case regarding neonatal sepsis has been reported internationally, with no sequelae. We report the first case of neonatal bacteremia and meningitis with empyema caused by S. lutetiensis in the United States.

Keywords: empyema, MALDI-TOF, Neonatal sepsis, neonatal meningitis, Streptococcus lutetiensis

Case report

A 28-day-old baby boy presented with fever, irritability, and inconsolability prompting the parents to seek medical attention. He had no other symptoms, including no upper respiratory symptoms, cough, vomiting, diarrhoea, or rash. He had been home and well since discharge from the newborn nursery. There were no identified sick contacts; however, the mother reported multiple visitors recently, the family has young pet chickens at home, and the patient’s stepsister visited a friend’s house with baby cows. He was born at term, weighing 3300 g. Maternal prenatal culture was negative for group B streptococcus. Foetal anomalies had been noted on early ultrasound including a two vessel cord, choroid plexus cyst, and short humerus and femur lengths. The choroid plexus cyst and short humerus and femur lengths resolved in later ultrasounds. Labour was uneventful, with spontaneous rupture of membranes for 6 h and thick meconium. At birth, the baby had 1 and 5 min Apgar scores of 9 and 9. Patient was discharged on post-partum day one without complications.

On presentation to the emergency room, vital signs were a temperature of 100.9 ° F, heart rate of 187 min−1, respiratory rate of 46 min−1, blood pressure of 101/58, and O2 saturations at 100 % on room air. On physical exam, he was well-appearing and without focal findings. A full sepsis workup was obtained. Therapy with intravenous ampicillin (75 mg kg−1 every 6 hours) and ceftazidime at meningitic doses (50 mg every 8 hours) was started. Laboratory studies revealed white blood cells at 10 360 µl−1 (neutrophils, 52 %, lymphocytes 30 %, monocytes 14 %, eosinophils 3 %, immature granulocytes 0.2 %). Urinalysis was negative for nitrates and leucocyte esterase. Influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, and COVID-19 testing were negative. Blood cultures and urine cultures were sent. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was obtained by lumbar puncture for culture, but there was inadequate sample size for additional CSF analysis.

Initial blood and CSF Gram-stain showed Gram-positive cocci in pairs and chains. BioFire Filmarray PCR reported Streptococci sp., not A, B, or pneumoniae. Both CSF and blood were cultured on chocolate agar and 5 % sheep blood agar. Subsequent colonies were analysed via MALDI-TOF, which identified the bacteria as Streptococcus lutetiensis , when compared to the negative controls of formic acid and matrix, as well as the positive controls of S. aureus, E. coli, and C. krusei. Further testing showed that it was sensitive to ceftriaxone (0.032 µg ml−1), penicillin (0.047 µg ml−1), and vancomycin. All culture and breakpoint protocols were performed according to CLSI guidelines. Ceftazidime was replaced with intravenous ceftriaxone (100 mg kg−1 every 1 d). Urine culture was negative. With the pathogen identified and susceptibilities known, the infant was continued on ceftriaxone alone. The fevers persisted, so brain MRI with and without contrast was performed on hospital day 5, revealing a small subdural empyema. The baby was transferred to the Paediatric ICU for close monitoring and neurological checks. Neurosurgery was consulted but surgical drainage was not pursued based on size of the empyema and patient’s reassuring clinical status. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin were 8.3 mg dl−1 and 2.69 ng ml−1, respectively. The fever resolved on day 6 of treatment. Follow up blood cultures from day 2, day 3, and day 6 of admission were all negative. Cardiac echocardiogram to rule out endocarditis was negative. Repeat MRI showed resolution of the empyema on hospital day 9, and the patient was discharged on hospital day 11 on ceftriaxone via Broviac line. The patient completed a 4 week course of ceftriaxone, and the Broviac was removed.

Since discharge, the infant experienced two seizure-like episodes, but with no associated fever, cyanosis, hypotonia, vomiting, diarrhoea, or change in feedings. Vital signs and labs including complete metabolic panel and blood count on both episodes were within normal limits. EKG and video EEGs were normal, and repeat MRIs of the brain with and without contrast were unremarkable for concerns of source of seizure or for infection. He is doing well without antiepileptic medications and follows with neurology and neurosurgery.

Discussion

Neonatal sepsis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Of the 0.98 cases of neonatal sepsis per 1000 live births, 43 % are due to group B streptococci and 29 % due to E. coli [1]. The organism isolated in our patient is classified as a group D streptococci and is a subtype of S. bovis . While group D streptococci, such as enterococci, are recognized as causes of neonatal sepsis, Streptococcus bovis is considered a rare cause of infection [2]. The exact prevalence of infection may be underestimated due to the misidentification of many clinical group D streptococci isolates as enterococci, which was formerly classified as part of the group D, or viridians, streptococci [3].

The taxonomic status of S. bovis has been undergoing active refinement due to the advancement of molecular sequencing and genetic techniques, and recently S. bovis may possibly be equivalent to S. equinus , and became grouped as the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex (SBSEC) [4]. For simplicity, we refer to SBSEC as S. bovis for the remainder of the text. Older literature demonstrates that S. bovis biotype I has the ability to hydrolyse starch and ferment mannitol, while S. bovis biotype II does not [5]. Biotype II is further divided into sub-biotypes II/1 and II/2, based on phenotypic testing for production of various sugars and amino acids and fermentation abilities [6]. Genetic analysis has now sub-divided S. bovis into five different species ( S. equinus , S. gallolyticus , S. infantarius , S. pasteurianus , and S. lutetiensis ) [7]. Further dissection of the S. bovis group by analysis of manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase gene resulted in the reclassification of S. infantarius subsp. coli to S. lutetiensis ( S. bovis biotype II/1), and S. bovis biotype II/2 as S. pasteurianus [8]. The isolates from the current case are presented with the current taxonomic classification as S. lutetiensis .

Identification of the correct isolate for each subspecies is crucial for choosing the appropriate antibiotic therapy, as well as management of potential sequelae. S. bovis biotype II, the organism identified in our infant, is associated with adult bacteremia, but can also cause invasive infection in neonates and infants [5, 9]. Beginning with the first recorded case in 1978 by Headings et al., there have been 55 reported cases of neonatal sepsis caused by S. bovis biotype II [10–14]. While the nine cases of neonatal sepsis caused by S. bovis did not biotype the clinical isolates prior to the year 2000, every subsequent case, except for one, identified the organism as S. bovis biotype II/2, or S. pasteurianus . In addition, it has been reported that S. pasteurianus neonatal sepsis can cause delayed central nervous system complications, as well as endocarditis and pneumonitis [10, 11].

While S. bovis is part of the normal colonic and oral flora, the source and mechanism of neonatal S. bovis infection remains elusive [15]. S. bovis has been isolated previously from normal vaginal secretions as well as from the rectum [16, 17]. However, our patient qualifies as late onset neonatal sepsis, and environmental exposure should be considered, including the potential contact with livestock. We suspect this is post-natal acquisition of the pathogen. While our patient did not have any sick contacts, there were numerous potential routes of infection: the patient had multiple visitors recently, the family raises young pet chickens at home, and the patient’s stepsister visited a friend’s house with baby cows. As noted in a prior case series, it is also possible that disruption of the gastrointestinal mucosa by gastroenteritis facilitates bacterial translocation, and may explain the pathogenesis though our patient did not have such gastrointenstinal symptoms at presentation [18]. In addition, S. bovis colonization of the ear and throat has been reported and human to human transmission is not impossible [19].

As of this writing, only one international case of neonatal sepsis known to be secondary to S. bovis subtype II/1, or S. lutetiensis , has been reported in the literature [20]. The previously reported case was also a 28 day old infant who presented with fever and elevated inflammatory markers. After antibiotic therapy, that previous infant defervesced on hospital day 2, and the patient was discharged to complete a 14 day course of ampicillin/sulbactam without sequalae. To our knowledge, our patient is the second reported case of S. lutetiensis neonatal sepsis and the first associated with meningitis and subdural empyema. Thus, it is clinically important to accurately identify the biotype of the bacteria using a rapid diagnostic method, such as MALDI-TOF, in order to monitor for possible adverse sequelae, and care must be taken when S. lutetiensis is isolated as the cause for neonatal sepsis. Our case suggests that S. lutetiensis may be associated with subdural empyemas, in addition to causing meningitis. As in our case, quick identification of the pathogen through rapid diagnostic methods can support decisions for targeted anti-microbial therapy which will treat the infection more effectively and lead to improved patient outcomes.

Funding information

The authors received no specific grant from any funding agency.

Author contributions

A.T.Y., K.S., C.A.B., and L.W.G. all participated in the conceptualization, investigation, writing, review, and editing of the manuscript, and care of the patient.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical statement

The patient concerned gave full consent to write-up and publication of the case.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CLSI, The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; EEG, electroencephalogram; EKG, electrocardiogram; ICU, Intensive Care Unit; MALDI-TOF, matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SBSEC, Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex.

References

  • 1.Shane AL, Sanchez PJ, Stoll BJ. Neonatal sepsis. Lancet. 2017;390:1770–1780. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31002-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siegel JD, McCracken GH. Group D streptococcal infections. J Pediatr. 1978;93:542–543. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)81207-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Facklam RR. Recognition of group D streptococcal species of human origin by biochemical and physiological tests. Appl Microbiol. 1972;23:1131–1139. doi: 10.1128/am.23.6.1131-1139.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pompilio A, Di Bonaventura G, Gherardi G. An overview on Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex isolates: identification to the species/subspecies level and antibiotic resistance. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20 doi: 10.3390/ijms20030480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee RA, Woo PCY, To APC, Lau SKP, Wong SSY, et al. Geographical difference of disease association in Streptococcus bovis bacteraemia. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52:903–908. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05199-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coykendall AL, Gustafson KB. Deoxyribonucleic acid hybridizations among strains of Streptococcus salivarius and Streptococcus bovis . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1985;35:274–280. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Facklam R. What happened to the streptococci: overview of taxonomic and nomenclature changes. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:613–630. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.4.613-630.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Poyart C, Quesne G, Trieu-Cuot P. Taxonomic dissection of the Streptococcus bovis group by analysis of manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase gene (sodA) sequences: reclassification of “Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli” as Streptococcus lutetiensis sp. nov. and of Streptococcus bovis biotype 11.2 as Streptococcus pasteurianus sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1247–1255. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-4-1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clarridge JE, Attorri SM, Zhang Q, Bartell J. 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis distinguishes biotypes of Streptococcus bovis: Streptococcus bovis Biotype II/2 is a separate genospecies and the predominant clinical isolate in adult males. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:1549–1552. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1549-1552.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nguyen MT, Idriss S, Guzman E, De Oliveira ER. Neonatal meningitis, endocarditis, and pneumonitis due to Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus: a case report. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19:265. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1645-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Park JW, Eun SH, Kim EC, Seong MW, Kim YK. Neonatal invasive Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus infection with delayed central nervous system complications. Korean J Pediatr. 2015;58:33–36. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2015.58.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Khan A. Relative penicillin resistance in Streptococcus bovis. A case of neonatal meningitis. J Paediatr Child Health. 2009;45:474–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gavin PJ, Thomson RB, Horng SJ, Yogev R. Neonatal sepsis caused by Streptococcus bovis variant (biotype II/2): report of a case and review. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:3433–3435. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.7.3433-3435.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Headings DL, Herrera A, Mazzi E, Bergman MA. Fulminant neonatal septicemia caused by Streptococcus bovis . J Pediatr. 1978;92:282–283. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80026-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cheung M, Pelot M, Nadarajah R, Kohl S. Neonate with late onset Streptococcus bovis meningitis: case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19:891–893. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200009000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Egido JM, Maestre JR, Pena Izquierdo MY. The isolation of Streptococcus morbillorum from vaginal exudates. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1995;28:117–122. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86821995000200006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fikar CR, Levy J. Streptococcus bovis meningitis in a neonate. Am J Dis Child. 1979;133:1149–1150. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1979.02130110057009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gerber JS, Glas M, Frank G, Shah SS. Streptococcus bovis infection in young Infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:1069–1073. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000240334.91713.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Binghuai L, Wenjun S, Xinxin L. Intrauterine infection and post-partum bacteraemia due to Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus . J Med Microbiol. 2013;62:1617–1619. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.054106-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim JS, Hong YR, Yang HY, Oh CE. A case of late onset neonatal bacteremia and meningitis caused by Streptococcus lutetiensis . Korean J Pediatr Infect Dis. 2014;21:219. doi: 10.14776/kjpid.2014.21.3.219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Access Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES