Abstract
We have shown that the fundamental step responsible for enantioinduction in the inner-sphere asymmetric Tsuji allylic alkylation is C–C bond formation through a seven-membered pericyclic transition state. We employ an extensive series of quantum mechanics (QM) calculations to delineate how the electronic structure of the Pd-catalyzed C–C bond forming process controls the reaction. Phase inversion introduced by d orbitals renders the Pd-catalyzed [π2s + π2s + σ2s + σ2s] reaction symmetry-allowed in the ground state, proceeding through a transition state with Craig–Möbius-like σ-aromaticity. Lastly, we connect QM to fundamental valence bonding concepts by deriving an ab initio “arrow-pushing” mechanism that describes the flow of electron density through the reaction.
The fundamental step responsible for enantioinduction in the inner-sphere asymmetric Tsuji allylic alkylation is C–C bond formation through a seven-membered pericyclic transition state (TS1) (Figure 1A).1 Since the original computational reports by our groups2 and others,3 the relationship between this class of seven-membered transition states to those of the canonical pericyclic reactions as described by Woodward and Hoffmann is underexplored.4 Exemplifying the peculiar nature of the reaction, an analogous transformation in a system comprised of main group elements remains elusive.5 Given the key role of this seven-membered pericyclic process in asymmetric catalysis, we sought to delineate the underlying reactivity paradigm that enables this unique reactivity.
To obtain a general understanding of this bond forming event, we first examined an analogous system comprised of main group elements, namely, the reaction of diallyl sulfone 3 to sulfur dioxide (4) and 1,5-hexadiene (5) (Figure 2). If the geometry of the seven-membered quasi-cheletropic transition state (TS2) is constrained to match that of TS1, then a suprafacial relationship among the eight correlating orbitals with linear departure of the chelefuge is mandated. Thus, the transformation of 3 to 4 + 5 is designated [π2s + π2s + σ2s + σ2s], and the reverse is designated as [ω2s + π2s + π2s + σ2s].
With four suprafacial two-electron terms, the ground-state [π2s + π2s + σ2s + σ2s] pericyclic reaction of 3 to 4 + 5 is anticipated to be symmetry-forbidden by the generalized Woodward–Hoffmann rules.4 An identical conclusion is reached for chelefuges such as CO and N2 in the ground state.6 Given the low thermal barriers with which the Pd-catalyzed transformations proceed (ΔG⧧ = 10–20 kcal/mol),1 we became curious as to whether the transformation is similarly forbidden for a LnPd0-like chelefuge.
To uncover the electronic origins that enable the transition metal-mediated pericyclic processes, we turned to ab initio quantum mechanics (QM) calculations. Calculations were carried out with the ORCA ab initio package (see the Supporting Information for full computational details).7 Complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) theory is utilized to capture the multiconfigurational nature of the potential energy surface (PES), where the (8,8) active space is defined to be the eight valence electrons in eight correlating orbitals as described by orbital correlation diagrams. Dynamical correlation is accounted for via N-electron valence state perturbation theory8 (NEVPT2) single-point calculations on the CASSCF wave functions. All geometry optimizations and frequency calculations were carried out with the triple-ζ quality def2-TZVP basis set9 on all atoms (with the small core ECP28MWB pseudopotential10 on Pd, i.e., 18 explicit electrons including the 4s and 4p core electrons). For transition metal complexes with insignificant multiconfigurational character, geometries were obtained with density functional theory (DFT) (PBE0-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP)11 followed by CASSCF/NEVPT2 single-point calculations with the def2-TZVPP basis set. Solvation was accounted for in single-point calculation with the SMD model for THF.12 All energies reported are solvated free energies at 298.15 K.
Beginning with main group analog diallyl sulfone (3), generation of symmetry-adapted linear combinations of correlating valence orbitals under approximate C2 symmetry affords symmetric (a) and antisymmetric (b) sets of σ/σ*(C–S) and π/π*(C–C) orbitals (Figure 2A). Correlating these orbitals to those of the product implies an avoided crossing along the ground-state potential energy surface (PES) as the diabatic state describing 3, |ΦA⟩, corresponds to a doubly excited state of the products. A single transition state connecting 3 to 4 + 5 was not found on the CASSCF potential energy surface. Rather, a stepwise process involving singlet diradical intermediate 10 was found (Figure 2B).13 At this point, the ground-state configuration interaction (CI) vector possesses nearly equal contributions of configurations |ΦS⟩ and |ΦA⟩, leading to a diradical index d = 98.0% (Figure 2C).14 Calculations with multireference iterative difference-dedicated CI (IDDCI) theory provide d = 95.4% and a singlet/triplet exchange coupling constant (J) of 83 cm−1.15
In summary, the required crossing of the starting material (3) and product (4 + 5) diabatic ground states renders the concerted [π2s + π2s + σ2s + σ2s] reaction symmetry-forbidden. The ground-state PES of 3 → 4 + 5 is characterized by a stepwise mechanism involving weakly coupled diradical 10, with an overall ΔG‡ of >50 kcal/mol, contrasting the low thermal barriers of Pd-catalyzed transformations (ΔG‡ = 10–20 kcal/mol).1 Given this, we became curious as to whether the Pd-catalyzed transformation is similarly symmetry-forbidden, proceeding through a low-energy diradical intermediate, or whether a unique set of symmetry elements describes the transformation that conserves orbital symmetry through the reaction.
In order to probe this hypothesis, we first considered the case of a simplified bis(η1-allyl)PdII complex, 6. Contrary to 3, we find a single low-energy transition state (TS3), with ΔG‡ = 13.4 kcal/mol, on the spin-restricted DFT (PBE0-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP) PES connecting 6 to 8 (Figure 3B). We obtain a similar result for (η1-allyl)PdII enolate 7. We find that the ground-state wave function along the PES is stable with respect to symmetry breaking, suggesting that a single closed-shell singlet (CSS) configuration is dominant. This suggests that simple DFT geometries should be reliable for these palladium complexes and will be used in the following.
For comparison to the symmetry-forbidden transformation of 3 to 4 + 5, we construct the corresponding orbital correlation diagram for the conversion of 6 to 8 (Figure 3A). The four occupied correlating orbitals of starting complex 6 are identical in symmetry to those of diallyl sulfone 1. However, unlike the products of the thermally-forbidden reaction (4 + 5), complex 8 maintains the orbital symmetries of ground-state minimum 6. This is further evident in the composition of the ground-state CASSCF wave function at TS3, with weights of 0.86 and 0.02 for the dominant CSS configuration and second largest contributor, respectively. Hence, the Pd-catalyzed transformation is symmetry-allowed. The symmetry of the lone pair-like orbital of the chelefuge differentiates between the thermally-allowed and forbidden scenarios. In ground state SO2, the lone pair occupies a symmetric sp2 valence orbital (2a in Figure 2A), whereas in 8/9, this corresponds to the antisymmetric Pd-based orbital (2b in Figure 3A). Thus, the eight-electron seven-membered pericyclic transition is thermally-allowed in the cases of Pd complexes 7, 9, and 1 by virtue of the parity of the orbital involved in σ bonding with the organic scaffold.16
From the perspective of frontier molecular orbital (FMO) theory, the transformation is readily interpreted as the (in)ability of the chelefuge HOMO/donor to constructively interact with the antisymmetric LUMO/acceptor of the 1,5-hexadiene in the appropriate geometry (Figure 4). If constructive overlap is achieved, then net bonding is preserved through the transition state, and the reaction is thermally-allowed.16a,b This is the case for the Pd-catalyzed transformation as the Pd-based HOMO of hypothetical L2Pd0 chelefuge σ bonds with the diene in a suprafacial/antaranodal fashion (Figure 3C), that is, with phase inversion, constructively mixing with the diene LUMO (Figure 4C).17 This is not the case for the symmetric nucleophile lone pair orbitals of SO2 and CO.6
It is well-understood that concerted, symmetry-allowed pericyclic reactions preferentially proceed through aromatic transition states.18 Thus, if the Pd-catalyzed [π2s + π2s + σ2s + σ2s] reaction of 6 to 8 is indeed thermally-allowed, then TS3 should be aromatic in nature. From analysis of the active space MOs at TS3 we find elements of Craig–Möbius-like aromaticity within the σ bonding framework.19 Particularly interesting is that the HOMO and HOMO–2 conform to a Möbius topology with the Pd generating a phase inversion and an odd number of nodes (1 and 3) along the ring (Figure 4A).20 To probe this suspected aromaticity, we employ the nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS) method of Schleyer and co-workers.21 A NICS(0) of −19.4 ppm is calculated at the geometric center of the 7-membered ring of TS3, indicating aromaticity.22 Likewise, a positive NICS is found at various points along the external periphery. For enhanced visualization, the NICS at points along 2D grids are displayed in Figure 4B.
A principal objective of our investigation is to relate electronic structure to intuitive concepts in chemical bonding. As such, we sought to explore whether the Pd-catalyzed [π2s + π2s + σ2s + σ2s] transformation could be properly described by valence bonding concepts such as the ubiquitous “arrow-pushing” mechanisms of Robinson and Ingold.23 Given the single-configurational nature of the ground state density, the concept of electron flow is addressed through analysis of intrinsic bonding orbitals (IBOs) as described by Knizia and co-workers.24 Previously, IBO analysis was implemented to highlight electron flow through transition states, discern between classes of mechanisms, and evaluate synchronicity of bond making/breaking in these events.24 Generation of IBOs proceeds through a Pipek–Mezey-style localization where orbital charge contribution to an atomic center is measured by Intrinsic Atomic Orbital (IAO) charge.24a,b At no point in the localization are empirical concepts of valence bonding introduced, thus the ensuing insight is purely ab initio to the extent of the preceding calculation.
IBO analysis was carried out with the full (PHOX)Pd enolate system (Figure 5). Four IBOs (ϕi) undergo significant displacement along the intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) through 1 → TS1 → 2.25 The first of these, ϕ1, corresponds to the localized π(C–C) bond of the enolate fragment, which smoothly progresses to encapsulate the density of the newly formed σ(C–C) bond of the product (Figure 5). Likewise, ϕ2, ϕ3, and ϕ4 track the transformations of π(C–C) → π(C–C)′, ,26 and σ(Pd–O) → π(C–O), respectively. Considering these transformations together reveals an intrinsic directionality to the flow of electron density in the Pd-catalyzed [π2s + π2s + σ2s + σ2s] reaction. Inspection of the relative magnitudes of net orbital displacement along the IRC further suggests synchronicity in the bond making/breaking events of the [π2s + π2s + σ2s + σ2s] process (Figure 5). In accord with the initial reports of Knizia and co-workers, we also find the localized IBOs obtained from the ground-state densities closely resemble valence orbitals as portrayed in simple Lewis structures. Thus, tracking the net flow of electron density is carried out in the same valence bonding framework. The result is a mechanism described by the synchronous movement of valence bonding electron pairs, or more precisely, a first-principles-derived “arrow-pushing” mechanism that accounts for the net change in bonding along the reaction coordinate in a chemically intuitive orbital basis (Figure 5).24b,c
In conclusion, we find the Pd-catalyzed [π2s + π2s + σ2s + σ2s] reaction to be symmetry-allowed in the ground state owing to the phase-inverting role of the Pd orbital in the σ bonding framework of the transition state. Insights from this investigation are contextualized within the frameworks of the Woodward–Hoffmann rules, orbital correlation diagrams, and FMO theory. As with prototypical thermally-allowed pericyclic reactions, we find the Pd-catalyzed [π2s + π2s + σ2s + σ2s] reaction proceeds through an aromatic transition state. Finally, we describe a first-principles-derived “arrow-pushing” mechanism from analysis of the flow of electron density through the transformation by means of IBOs. These efforts highlight the connection between ab initio electronic structure calculations and empirical bonding concepts, thus facilitating a natural conceptualization of chemical bonding in these unique systems.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Professor Kendall Houk (UCLA) for insightful discussion. The Caltech High Performance Computing (HPC) center is acknowledged for support of computational resources. We thank the NIH (R01 GM080269), NSF (CBET-1805022), NSF (CBET-2005250), and Caltech for financial support.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.0c09575.
Supporting Information, computational details, and Cartesian coordinates (PDF)
Quantum mechanical energies (XLSX)
Animation of IBO transformation (MP4)
Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/jacs.0c09575
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Contributor Information
Alexander Q. Cusumano, The Warren and Katharine Schlinger Laboratory for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
William A. Goddard, III, Materials and Process Simulation Center, Beckman Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
Brian M. Stoltz, The Warren and Katharine Schlinger Laboratory for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
REFERENCES
- (1).(a) Cusumano AQ; Stoltz BM; Goddard WA III Reaction Mechanism, Origins of Enantioselectivity, and Reactivity Trends in Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation: A Comprehensive Quantum Mechanics Investigation of a C(sp3)–C(sp3) Cross-Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142 (32), 13917–13933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) McPherson KE; Croatt MP; Morehead AT; Sargent AL DFT Mechanistic Investigation of an Enantioselective Tsuji–Trost Allylation Reaction. Organometallics 2018, 37 (21), 3791–3802. [Google Scholar]
- (2).(a) Keith JA; Behenna DC; Mohr JT; Ma S; Marinescu SC; Oxgaard J; Stoltz BM; Goddard WA III The Inner-Sphere Process in the Enantioselective Tsuji Allylation Reaction with (S)-t-Bu-Phosphinooxazoline Ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129 (39), 11876–11877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Keith JA; Behenna DC; Sherden N; Mohr JT; Ma S; Marinescu SC; Nielsen RJ; Oxgaard J; Stoltz BM; Goddard WA III The Reaction Mechanism of the Enantioselective Tsuji Allylation: Inner-Sphere and Outer-Sphere Pathways, Internal Rearrangements, and Asymmetric C–C Bond Formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134 (46), 19050–19060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).(a) Pérez-Rodríguez M; Braga AAC; de Lera AR; Maseras F;Álvarez R; Espinet P A DFT Study of the Effect of the Ligands in the Reductive Elimination from Palladium Bis(Allyl) Complexes. Organometallics 2010, 29 (21), 4983–4991. [Google Scholar]; (b) Méndez M; Cuerva JM; Gómez-Bengoa E; Cárdenas DJ; Echavarren AM Intra-molecular Coupling of Allyl Carboxylates with Allyl Stannanes and Allyl Silanes: A New Type of Reductive Elimination Reaction? Chem. - Eur. J 2002, 8 (16), 3620–3628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang P; Brozek LA; Morken JP Pd-Catalyzed Enantioselective Allyl–Allyl Cross-Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132 (31), 10686–10688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Woodward RB; Hoffmann R The Conservation of Orbital Symmetry; Verlag Chemie GmbH (BRD) and Academic Press Inc., 1971. [Google Scholar]
- (5).Despite our best efforts, we are unable to find literature examples of an identical main group analog fitting Δπ = 0 and Δσ = 1 in this 7-membered geometry.
- (6).See the Supporting Information for a discussion on CO/N2 as a chelefuge. For examples of reactivity of (iso)diazenes in cheletropic reactions, see; Lemal DM; McGregor SD Dienes from 3-Pyrrolines. A Stereospecific Deamination. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1966, 88 (6), 1335–1336. [Google Scholar]
- (7).(a) Neese F Software Update: The ORCA Program System, Version 4.0. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci 2018, 8, No. e1327. [Google Scholar]; (b) Neese F The ORCA Program System. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci 2012, 2, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
- (8).(a) Angeli C; Cimiraglia R; Malrieu J-P N-Electron Valence State Perturbation Theory: A Fast Implementation of the Strongly Contracted Variant. Chem. Phys. Lett 2001, 350 (3), 297–305. [Google Scholar]; (b) Angeli C; Cimiraglia R; Malrieu J-P N-Electron Valence State Perturbation Theory: A Spinless Formulation and an Efficient Implementation of the Strongly Contracted and of the Partially Contracted Variants. J. Chem. Phys 2002, 117 (20), 9138–9153. [Google Scholar]
- (9).Weigend F; Ahlrichs R Balanced Basis Sets of Split Valence, Triple Zeta Valence and Quadruple Zeta Valence Quality for H to Rn: Design and Assessment of Accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2005, 7 (18), 3297–3305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Andrae D; Häußermann U; Dolg M; Stoll H; Preuß H Energy-Adjusted ab Initio Pseudopotentials for the Second and Third Row Transition Elements. Theoret. Chim. Acta 1990, 77 (2), 123–141. [Google Scholar]
- (11).PBE0-D3(BJ): PBE0 hybrid density functional coupled with Becke–Johnson damped D3 dispersion correction. PBE0:; (a) Adamo C; Barone V Toward Reliable Density Functional Methods without Adjustable Parameters: The PBE0Model. J. Chem. Phys 1999, 110, 6158–6170. D3(BJ): [Google Scholar]; (b) Grimme S; Antony J; Ehrlich S; Krieg H A A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys 2010, 132 (15), 154104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Grimme S; Ehrlich S; Goerigk L Effect of the Damping Function in Dispersion Corrected Density Functional Theory. J. Comput. Chem 2011, 32, 1456–1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Marenich AV; Cramer CJ; Truhlar DG Universal Solvation Model Based on Solute Electron Density and on a Continuum Model of the Solvent Defined by the Bulk Dielectric Constant and Atomic Surface Tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113 (18), 6378–6396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Similar results were obtained with broken-symmetry DFT (see the Supporting Information for details). We are unable to find a concerted closed-shell singlet [π2a + π2s + σ2s + σ2s] transition state. Additionally, singlet diradical 10 in the boat conformation collapses to the corresponding cyclobutene.
- (14).Diradical index defined as described by Neese and co-workers, with d = 98.0% indicating of 98% diradical character. Here, c0 and cd are the factional contributions of the relevant bonding and antibonding configurations to the ground-state CI wave function.; (a) Herebian D; Wieghardt KE; Neese F Analysis and Interpretation of Metal-Radical Coupling in a Series of Square Planar Nickel Complexes: Correlated Ab Initio and Density Functional Investigation of [Ni(LISQ)2] (LISQ = 3,5-Di-Tert-Butyl-o-Diiminobenzosemiquinonate(1-)). J. Am. Chem. Soc 2003, 125 (36), 10997–11005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Note that through-bond coupling of 2b with σ*(C–C) and 3a with σ(C–C) gives rise to 2b being lower in energy than the symmetric 3a. For further discussion, see; (b) Stuyver T; Chen B; Zeng T; Geerlings P; De Proft F; Hoffmann R Do Diradicals Behave Like Radicals? Chem. Rev 2019, 119 (21), 11291–11351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Calculated from singlet and triplet diradical references starting from state-averaged CASSCF orbitals. At the CASSCF/def2-TZVP geometry, IDDCI predicts the spin centers at complex 10 are ferromagnetically coupled (J = 82.9 cm−1). The state-averaged CASSCF and NEVPT2 wave functions afford J of −12.1 and 3.2 cm−1, respectively (see the Supporting Information for further details). BS-DFT (PBE0-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP) calculations afford J = −38.9 cm−1 at the CASSCF/def2-TZVP geometry; however, at the broken-symmetry MS = 0 and high-spin (S = 1) DFT-optimized geometries, the spin centers are found to be ferromagnetically coupled, with J = 30.0 and 37.0 cm−1, respectively. For the DDCI method, see; (a) Miralles J; Daudey J-P; Caballol R Variational Calculation of Small Energy Differences. The Singlet-Triplet Gap in [Cu2Cl6]2−. Chem. Phys. Lett 1992, 198 (6), 555–562. [Google Scholar]; (b) García VM; Castell O; Caballol R; Malrieu JP An Iterative Difference-Dedicated Configuration Interaction. Proposal and Test Studies. Chem. Phys. Lett 1995, 238 (4), 222–229. [Google Scholar]; (c) García VM; Reguero M; Caballol R Application of the Iterative Difference-Dedicated Configuration Interaction Method to the Determination of Excitation Energies in Some Benchmark Systems: Be, CH+, BH and CH2. Theor. Chem. Acc 1997, 98 (1), 50–56. [Google Scholar]; As implemented in ORCA, we employ the uncontracted (iterative) DDCI3 variant (see the Supporting Information for details).
- (16).A similar effect was observed by Steigerwald and Goddard in studying the thermally-allowed [2s + 2s] σ bond metathesis of D2 by transition metal hydrides.; (a) Steigerwald ML; Goddard WA III The 2s + 2s Reactions at Transition Metals. 1. The Reactions of Deuterium with Dichlorohydrotitanium(1+) Ion (Cl2TiH+), Titanium Hydrogen Dichloride (Cl2TiH), and Scandium Hydrogen Dichloride (Cl2ScH). J. Am. Chem. Soc 1984, 106 (2), 308–311. [Google Scholar]; (b) Steigerwald ML; Goddard WA III 2s + 2s Reactions at Transition Metals. Part 3. Dichlorotitanacyclopropane. The Structure and Reactivity of a Metallacyclopropane. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1985, 107 (18), 5027–5035. [Google Scholar]; For further discussion on transition-metal enabled [2s+2s], see; (c) Mango FD; Schachtschneider JH Orbital Symmetry Restraints to Transition Metal Catalyzed [2 + 2] Cycloaddition Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1971, 93 (5), 1123–1130. [Google Scholar]; For additional representative examples of transition-metal intervention in pericyclic reactions, see; (d) Tantillo DJ; Hoffmann R Demoniac Intervention in the Thermal Electrocyclic Ring Opening of Cyclobutenes: Fe(CO)3 Complexation of Pericyclic Transition Structures. Helv. Chim. Acta 2001, 84 (6), 1396–1404. [Google Scholar]; (e) Siebert MR; Tantillo DJ Transition-State Complexation in Palladium-Promoted [3,3] Sigmatropic Shifts. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129 (28), 8686–8687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Tantillo DJ; Hoffmann R Complicated Goings-On in the Metal-Manipulated Ring-Opening of Cyclobutene. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2001, 123 (40), 9855–9859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Tantillo DJ; Carpenter BK; Hoffmann R Disrotatory and Conrotatory Transition Structures for the Fe(CO)3-Templated Rearrangement of Methylenecyclopropane to Trimethylenemethane. Organometallics 2001, 20 (22), 4562–4564. [Google Scholar]
- (17).LUMO as derived qualitatively for FMO analysis from two interacting three electron allyl fragments.
- (18).For further discussion of aromaticity in pericyclic transition states, see; (a) Schleyer P. v. R.; Wu JI; Cossío FP; Fernández I Aromaticity in Transition Structures. Chem. Soc. Rev 2014, 43 (14), 4909–4921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Dewar MJS Aromaticity and Pericyclic Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl 1971, 10 (11), 761–776. and references therein. [Google Scholar]
- (19).(a) Craig DP; Paddock NL A novel type of aromaticity. Nature 1958, 181, 1052–1053. [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhu C; Luo M; Zhu Q; Zhu J; Schleyer P. v R.; Wu JI-C; Lu X; Xia H. Planar Möbius Aromatic Pentalenes Incorporating 16 and 18 Valence Electron Osmiums. Nat. Commun 2014, 5 (1), 3265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) An K; Shen T; Zhu J Craig-Type Möbius Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity in Dimetalla[10]Annulenes: A Metal-Induced Yin-and-Yang Pair. Organometallics 2017, 36 (17), 3199–3204. For a review on Möbius topologies, see [Google Scholar]; (d) Rzepa HS Möbius Aromaticity and Delocalization. Chem. Rev 2005, 105 (10), 3697–3715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Hua Y; Zhang H; Xia H; Houk KN Three Classes of π-Aromaticity. 2020, unpublished. [Google Scholar]
- (21).(a) Schleyer P. v. R.; Maerker C; Dransfeld A; Jiao H; van Eikema Hommes NJR Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts: A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1996, 118 (26), 6317–6318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chen Z; Wannere CS; Corminboeuf C; Puchta R; Schleyer P. v. R. Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts (NICS) as an Aromaticity Criterion. Chem. Rev 2005, 105 (10), 3842–3888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).For use of NICS for determination of transition state aromaticity, see Jiao, H.; Schleyer, P. v. R. Aromaticity of Pericyclic Reaction Transition Structures: Magnetic Evidence. J. Phys. Org. Chem 1998, 11 (8–9), 655–662. [Google Scholar]
- (23).(a) Ingold CK Principles of an Electronic Theory of Organic Reactions. Chem. Rev 1934, 15 (2), 225–274. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kermack WO; Robinson R LI.—An Explanation of the Property of Induced Polarity of Atoms and an Interpretation of the Theory of Partial Valencies on an Electronic Basis. J. Chem. Soc., Trans 1922, 121 (0), 427–440. [Google Scholar]
- (24).(a) Knizia G Intrinsic Atomic Orbitals: An Unbiased Bridge between Quantum Theory and Chemical Concepts. J. Chem. Theory Comput 2013, 9 (11), 4834–4843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Knizia G; Klein JEMN Electron Flow in Reaction Mechanisms—Revealed from First Principles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2015, 54 (18), 5518–5522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Klein JEMN; Knizia G CPCET versus HAT: A Direct Theoretical Method for Distinguishing X–H Bond-Activation Mechanisms. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2018, 57 (37), 11913–11917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Ishida K; Morokuma K; Komornicki A The Intrinsic Reaction Coordinate. An Ab Initio Calculation for HNC→HCN and H−+CH4→CH4+H−. J. Chem. Phys 1977, 66 (5), 2153–2156. [Google Scholar]
- (26).Final IBO at 2 is of parentage with π-back-bonding to the olefin observed.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.