ABSTRACT
Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 3 (APOBEC3) proteins are critical for the control of infection by retroviruses. These proteins deaminate cytidines in negative-strand DNA during reverse transcription, leading to G-to-A changes in coding strands. Uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) is a host enzyme that excises uracils in genomic DNA, which the base excision repair machinery then repairs. Whether UNG removes uracils found in retroviral DNA after APOBEC3-mediated mutation is not clear, and whether this occurs in vivo has not been demonstrated. To determine if UNG plays a role in the repair of retroviral DNA, we used APOBEC3G (A3G) transgenic mice which we showed previously had extensive deamination of murine leukemia virus (MLV) proviruses. The A3G transgene was crossed onto an Ung and mouse Apobec3 knockout background (UNG−/−APO−/−), and the mice were infected with MLV. We found that virus infection levels were decreased in A3G UNG−/−APO−/− compared with A3G APO−/− mice. Deep sequencing of the proviruses showed that there were significantly higher levels of G-to-A mutations in proviral DNA from A3G transgenic UNG−/−APO−/− than A3G transgenic APO−/− mice, suggesting that UNG plays a role in the repair of uracil-containing proviruses. In in vitro studies, we found that cytoplasmic viral DNA deaminated by APOBEC3G was uracilated. In the absence of UNG, the uracil-containing proviruses integrated at higher levels into the genome than those made in the presence of UNG. Thus, UNG also functions in the nucleus prior to integration by nicking uracil-containing viral DNA, thereby blocking integration. These data show that UNG plays a critical role in the repair of the damage inflicted by APOBEC3 deamination of reverse-transcribed DNA.
IMPORTANCE While APOBEC3-mediated mutation of retroviruses is well-established, what role the host base excision repair enzymes play in correcting these mutations is not clear. This question is especially difficult to address in vivo. Here, we use a transgenic mouse developed by our lab that expresses human APOBEC3G and also lacks the endogenous uracil DNA glycosylase (Ung) gene and show that UNG removes uracils introduced by this cytidine deaminase in MLV reverse transcripts, thereby reducing G-to-A mutations in proviruses. Furthermore, our data suggest that UNG removes uracils at two stages in infection—first, in unintegrated nuclear viral reverse-transcribed DNA, resulting in its degradation; and second, in integrated proviruses, resulting in their repair. These data suggest that retroviruses damaged by host cytidine deaminases take advantage of the host DNA repair system to overcome this damage.
KEYWORDS: APOBEC3, base-excision repair, uracil DNA glycosylase, murine retrovirus
INTRODUCTION
Organisms adapt to infectious agents by developing protective responses, and conversely, these agents develop adaptive countermeasures to these responses. Host defenses against infectious agents include various mechanisms of innate and adaptive immunity. One such family of host factors, apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 3 (APOBEC3) proteins, belongs to a larger gene family encoding DNA and RNA editing enzymes characterized by the presence of at least one cytidine deaminase (CDA) domain (1). This family includes the activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) protein which is responsible for class-switch recombination and somatic hypermutation of the B cell receptor locus during germinal center development in lymph nodes, thereby contributing to antibody diversity (2). Cytidine deaminases, as well as other mutagens, such as UV light, cause C-to-U changes in genomic DNA, which are then read as thymidines by the DNA polymerase. (3). As such, the base excision repair (BER) machinery, including the nuclear form of uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG), removes uracils from DNA and in conjunction with other BER proteins restores the original sequence. Since this latter process is error prone, it also causes mutations (4). There are two UNG splice variants; the mitochondrial form UNG1 performs a similar role in this compartment (5). If UNG2, here referred to as UNG, is not present, the uracils are read as thymidines by DNA polymerase II, and G-to-A transitions in the opposite strand occur (6). While UNG works on both double-strand DNA (dsDNA) with mismatches, its preferred template is single-strand DNA (7).
When packaged into retroviral virions, APOBEC3 proteins inhibit infection in target cells by deaminating deoxycytidine residues on minus-strand DNA, causing G-to-A mutations in newly synthesized retrovirus-coding strand DNA (8, 9). Deamination leads to degradation of reverse transcribed DNA prior to integration and to G-to-A coding strand mutations of viral genes in the integrated provirus. APOBEC3 genes are highly evolving and show strong signs of positive selection; the number of APOBEC3 genes varies from species to species, from 1 gene in mice to 7 genes in primates (1, 10). Human APOBEC3G and 3F were first shown to inhibit HIV-1 lacking the vif gene, which encodes a protein expressed at high levels late in infection (11–15). In Vif-deficient-HIV producer cells, APOBEC3 proteins are packaged into progeny virions via interaction with the nucleocapsid protein and viral RNA (16–20).
APOBEC3 proteins also inhibit replication by a number of CDA-independent mechanisms (21). In vitro studies have suggested that APOBEC3 proteins inhibit elongation and accumulation of HIV-1 reverse transcription products, and we and others have shown that mouse APOBEC3 restricts MLV and mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) mostly by inhibiting reverse transcription both in vivo and in vitro (22–27). Mouse retroviruses are not refractory to APOBEC3-mediated deamination; however, both in vitro and in vivo studies using cells and mice transgenic for human APOBEC3G have demonstrated extensive deamination of MLV and MMTV sequences (28–30).
The role of UNG in uracil removal from APOBEC3G-deaminated DNA has been studied in tissue culture cells, with conflicting conclusions (31–34). Here, we tested whether UNG contributed to the repair of APOBEC3G-mediated deamination of replicating MLV in vivo, by generating human APOBEC3G (A3G) transgenic mice that lacked the Ung as well as the mouse Apobec3 genes. We found that A3G+, Ung-containing mice were more highly infected with MLV than A3G+ Ung knockout (KO) mice and that proviral DNA from the latter strain had substantially more G-to-A mutations. In vitro studies showed that more APOBEC3G-deaminated proviral DNA was integrated into chromosomes in the absence of UNG, suggesting that UNG removal of uracils from unintegrated viral nuclear DNA prevents its integration. These data demonstrate that UNG can counteract the DNA damage inflicted by APOBEC3 deamination.
RESULTS
We reported previously that transgenic mice expressing human APOBEC3G and deficient in mouse APOBEC3 (APO−/−) were less infected by MLV and that the proviruses found in these mice showed high levels of G-to-A mutations (29). To determine if UNG played a role in the repair of these mutations, we generated UNG−/−APO−/− and A3GhighUNG−/−APO−/− mice (heterozygous for the A3Ghigh allele) (29). UNG knockout mice are viable and do not display a phenotype other than altered class-switch recombination but accumulate uracil in their genome (35). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from A3Ghigh mice express APOBEC3G at levels similar to those in humans (29). The UNG−/−APO−/−and A3GhighUNG−/−APO−/−mice were crossed and newborn pups from this cross were infected with Moloney MLV (MMLV). Newborn APO−/− and A3GhighAPO−/− mice from similar heterozygote crosses were also infected for comparison. At 16 days postinfection (dpi) and 1 month postinfection, MLV titers in the spleens or blood of these mice, respectively, were determined, followed by genotyping for the A3G transgene. Integrated DNA at both time points and viral RNA levels at 16 days postinfection were also determined. At 16 days and 1 month postinfection, expression of APOBEC3G reduced in vivo infection by ∼2 logs in the spleen and peripheral blood, both in the presence and absence of UNG, compared with that of the nontransgenic APO−/− and UNG−/−APO−/−mice (Fig. 1A, B, and D) (28, 29). Infection levels were lower in the A3GhighUNG−/−APO−/−mice than that in the A3GhighAPO−/− mice (∼3-fold lower titers at both time points). Splenic viral RNA and DNA levels were also reduced by 1 log at 16 dpi in the A3GhighUNG−/−APO−/− compared with those in the A3GhighAPO−/− mice (Fig. 1B and C). APO−/− and UNG−/−APO−/− mice showed no significant difference in infection.
FIG 1.
APOBEC3G restricts murine retrovirus infection in vivo, in both the presence and absence of UNG. (A) Newborn mice of the indicated genotypes were infected with 2 × 103 infectious centers (ICs) of MLV and sacrificed at 16 days dpi, and virus titers in spleens were measured. n = 11 APO−/−, 19 UNG−/−APO−/−, 10 A3GhighAPO−/−, and 23 A3GhighUNG−/− APO−/− mice. (B) DNA was isolated from spleens at 16 dpi and subjected to qPCR with primers specific to MMLV Env (SuMLV). n = 13 APO−/−, 9 UNG−/−APO−/−, 8 A3GhighAPO−/−, and 13 A3GhighUNG−/− APO−/− mice. (C) Viral RNA levels were analyzed by RT-qPCR from spleens at 16 dpi. n = 5 APO−/−, 5 UNG−/−APO−/−, 5 A3GhighAPO−/−, and 6 A3GhighUNG−/− APO−/− mice. (D) Mice infected with MMLV were bled at 1 month postinfection, and virus titers in plasma were measured. n = 14 APO−/−, 18 UNG−/−APO−/−, 23 A3GhighAPO−/−, and 22 A3GhighUNG−/− APO−/− mice. (E) DNA was isolated from PBMCs at 1 month postinfection and subject to qPCR with SuMLV primers. For A to E, each point represents the data obtained from an individual mouse; the average for each group is shown by a horizontal bar (limit of detection, 200 copies/ml; dashed line). (F) Fraction of proviral DNA from spleen at 16 dpi that contains uracil (Frac U), as determined by the Ex-qPCR method, using SuMLV primers specific to the env gene. (G) Fraction of proviruses from PMBCs at 1 month postinfection that contain uracil as determined by Ex-qPCR. Values represent the mean ± SD from at least 7 different mice. Unpaired two-tailed t tests were used to determine significance. ****, P ≤ 0.0001; **, P ≤ 0.006; *, P ≤ 0.05; ns, not significant. (H) DNA isolated from the spleens of MLV-infected mice of the indicated genotypes at 16 dpi was amplified with Taq or Pfu polymerase. Each lane is DNA from an individual mouse.
We also examined uracil incorporation in MLV DNA, using 2 different techniques. First, a PCR-based technique, Excision qPCR (Ex-qPCR), developed by the Stivers lab, was used to determine the fraction of uracil in integrated DNA (34). At 16 dpi, there was more uracil incorporated in the MLV sequences found in the spleens both UNG+ and UNG- A3GhighAPO−/− mice than that in the nontransgenic strains (Fig. 1F). Moreover, the highest levels of uracil were detected in the A3GhighUNG−/−APO−/−DNA samples. Similar results were seen at 1 month postinfection (Fig. 1G), although the integrated DNA levels were not significantly different (Fig. 1E). We also used a second technique to examine uracil incorporation, which relies on the inability of Pfu polymerase to elongate in the presence of uracil compared with Taq polymerase (36). DNA from the infected spleens of UNG+ and UNG− A3GhighAPO−/− mice (16 dpi) amplified more poorly with Pfu polymerase than those from APO−/− and UNG−/−APO−/− mice (Fig. 1H). Moreover, DNA from the A3GhighUNG−/−APO−/− mice hardly amplified with the Pfu polymerase. These data suggest that C-to-U mutations introduced by APOBEC3G into proviruses are not repaired efficiently in the absence of UNG.
Proviruses in the DNA of A3GhighUNG KO mice have more G-to-A coding strand mutations.
We next subjected DNA isolated from the spleens of individual mice to NextGen sequencing, using primers that spanned the viral genome and that did not amplify endogenous MLV sequences (Fig. 2A). The proviral DNA isolated from the infected spleens of A3GhighUNG−/−APO−/−mice had almost 2 times more G-to-A mutations than the A3GhighAPO−/− mice and both had mutations at >10-fold higher levels than their nontransgenic counterparts (Fig. 2B). No other types of mutations, including C-to-T mutations indicative of noncoding strand deamination or errors introduced by BER, varied between the different mouse strains (Fig. 2B). The G-to-A mutations were high in the UNG− A3Ghighmice in all regions of the genome compared with those in the UNG+ A3Ghigh mice (Fig. 2C). Interestingly, in addition to there being a hot spot for APOBEC3G mutations in the 3′ end of the provirus, as has been seen for other retroviruses, there was a second hot spot in the gag gene (red arrows in Fig. 2C). The G-to-A mutations were found predominantly in the APOBEC3G motif GG in the coding strand of both the UNG+ and UNG− A3Ghigh transgenic mice (Fig. 2B and D).
FIG 2.
Deamination in the proviral DNA of infected transgenic mice. (A) The MLV provirus is shown with the locations of six primers that cover the viral genome. (B) DNA was isolated from spleens at 16 dpi and subjected to NextGen sequencing to determine G-to-A mutations, all other mutations, and C-to-T mutations in the proviral DNA. (C) G-to-A mutations present across the proviral genome. Red arrows show two hot spots for APOBEC3G mutations in the gag (1000 to 3000) and env (6000 to 8000) genes. The percentage of GG context in each region of the provirus is showed below the x axis. Each point represents the G-to-A, C-to-T, or all other mutations per kb obtained from an individual mouse. n = 11 APO−/−, 5 UNG−/−APO−/−, 4 A3GhighAPO−/−, and 13 A3GhighUNG−/− APO−/− mice. (D) Bar chart showing the percentage of G-to-A mutations in the GG context in proviral DNA. (E) G-to-A mutations in the U3/R and U5 regions. Numbering refers to position in viral RNA. Red arrows indicate GREs, and blue arrows indicate NFAT1 consensus sequences. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test was used to determine significance. **, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001; ns, not significant.
We also examined G-to-A mutations in the long terminal repeats (LTRs). We found several hot spots in both the U3 and U5 regions (Fig. 2E). Interestingly, the hot spots in U3 occurred in glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) and binding sites for NFAT1, which are known to be important for MLV transcription (37). There were two additional hot spots of unknown significance in U5.
These data confirm our previous findings that APOBEC3G mutates MLV and show that the absence of UNG leads to even higher G-to-A changes. The mutations found in the MLV-infected A3GhighUNG−/−APO−/−mice could have a greater effect on both coding regions and virus transcription, thereby decreasing in vivo infectivity.
G-to-A mutations in UNG−/− and UNG+/+ mice are lower in viral RNA than those in than DNA.
The proviral DNA isolated from UNG− A3Ghighmice showed substantially more mutations than that from UNG-containing A3Ghigh transgenic mice, and both virus titers and splenic viral RNA levels were reduced. We next examined whether there was a difference in the mutation level in viral RNA isolated from the spleens of mice 16 dpi. As was seen with the viral DNA, RNA from both strains of A3Ghigh transgenic mice had significantly more G-to-A mutations than the nontransgenic strains (Fig. 3A). However, while the G-to-A mutation level was 3-fold higher in DNA than that in RNA for both strains, the level of G-to-A mutations was similar in the viral RNA of the UNG+ and UNG− A3Ghigh transgenic mice; although, as was seen for the mutation level in DNA (Fig. 2), there was more variability in the UNG− A3Ghigh strain (Fig. 3B). The levels of both the nonsynonymous mutations and stop codons were higher in the proviral DNA of the A3GhighUNG−/−APO−/−mice than those of the A3Ghigh APO−/− mice (Fig. 3C). This finding suggests that only the less heavily mutated proviruses are able to replicate.
FIG 3.
G-to-A mutations in the viral RNA of infected transgenic mice. (A) RNA was isolated from spleens at 16 dpi and subjected to NextGen sequencing to determine G-to-A mutations and all other mutations in the viral RNA. (B) Comparisons of G-to-A mutations between DNA and RNA in A3GhighUNG−/− APO−/− mice and A3GhighAPO−/− mice are shown. (C) G-to-A mutations that cause nonsynonymous mutations and stop codons were analyzed in DNA and RNA. Comparisons of the level of nonsynonymous mutations and stop codons between DNA and RNA in A3GhighUNG−/− APO−/− mice and A3Ghigh APO−/− mice are shown. Each point represents the G-to-A or all other mutations per kb obtained from an individual mouse. n = 5 APO−/−, 4 UNG−/−APO−/−, 3 A3GhighAPO−/− and 9 A3GhighUNG−/− APO−/− mice. ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test was used to determine significance. ****, P ≤ 0.0001; ***, P ≤ 0.001**, P ≤ 0.01; *, P < 0.05; ns, not significant.
Integration levels are higher in UNG-depleted cells.
UNG is the major mammalian uracil deglycosylase that removes uracil from genomic DNA (35). The increased mutational burden in the proviral DNA found in A3Ghigh mice that lacked UNG could be due the lack of removal of uracil from unintegrated viral DNA or from integrated proviruses. To test at which step uracils are removed, we performed in vitro time course assays. First, we generated 293T-MCAT cells, which stably express the MLV receptor mCAT-1, that also expressed APOBEC3G. These cells, as well as 293T-MCAT cells not expressing APOBEC3G, were infected with MLV, and APOBEC3G-containing virus as well virus lacking APOBEC3G was isolated from the supernatants (Fig. 4A). Because APOBEC3G blocks replication, virus stocks were normalized by measurement of virion RNA and by Western blotting (Fig. 4A) (Materials and Methods). Equal amounts (virus RNA equivalents) of APOBEC3G-containing and -lacking viruses were used to infect 293-MCAT cells which were treated with UNG or control siRNAs; and at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postinfection (hpi), the cell extracts were fractionated into cytoplasmic, nuclear soluble, and insoluble fractions (Fig. 4B). UNG knockdown was confirmed by reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) (Fig. 4A). DNA was isolated from each of the fractions and subjected to qPCR to measure viral DNA levels, as well as to analyze uracil content.
FIG 4.
UNG removes uracils from unintegrated nuclear DNA and avoids integration. (A) Left: Western blots showing MLV viruses from the different cell lines used, and APOBEC3G expression in MLV virus from A3G MCAT cells. Right: shows the UNG knockdown. (B) Fractionation and Western blots of the cells used in C. Laminin B1 and α-tubulin were used as markers for the nucleus and cytoplasm, respectively. (C) Equal amounts of MLV were used to infect 293-MCAT cells which were transfected with UNG or control siRNAs at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postinfection (hpi); the cell extracts were fractionated into total, cytoplasmic, unintegrated nuclear, and integrated fractions. DNA was isolated from each of the fractions and subjected to qPCR to measure viral DNA levels using SuMLV primers for total, cytoplasmic, and unintegrated nuclear fractions. Integrated MLV DNA quantification was performed by real-time Alu-gag qPCR. Values were normalized to GAPDH for total and nuclear fractions, to mCytb for cytoplasmic fraction, and to total DNA for the unintegrated nuclear fraction. Each point shows the averages ± SD of 3 different experiments. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s or Šídák’s multiple-comparison test was used to determine significance. ****, P < 0.0001; ***, P < 0.001; *, P < 0.05. (D) Ex-qPCR method with SuMLV primers was used to determine the fraction of viruses containing uracils in the cytoplasmic, unintegrated, and high-molecular-weight nuclear fractions at 6 hpi. Bars show the average ± SD of 4 different experiments. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test was used to determine significance. **, P ≤ 0.01; ns, not significant.
Virus reverse transcription was diminished in cells infected with APOBEC3G-containing virus, irrespective of the expression of UNG. This finding was true for all unintegrated forms (nuclear and cytoplasmic) of viral reverse transcripts (Fig. 4C). However, while proviral integration levels remained low in cells infected with the APOBEC3G-containing virus and expressing UNG, in the UNG knockdown cells, levels of integrated viral DNA were almost at the same level as that in cells infected with virus lacking APOBEC3G (Fig. 4C, integrated). When uracil incorporation into the viral DNA from different fractions was determined, we found that uracil levels were higher in DNA isolated from all fractions of cells infected with APOBEC3G-containing virions (Fig. 4D). Moreover, while uracil levels in cytoplasmic viral DNA in the UNG-expressing and -depleted cells infected with APOBEC3G-containing virus were similar, the levels in unintegrated nuclear and integrated proviral DNA from the UNG-depleted cells were higher than those from UNG-expressing cells (Fig. 4D). Taken together, these data suggest that (i) UNG removes uracils from unintegrated viral DNA in the nucleus, and this nicked DNA integrates less efficiently than uracil-containing, intact viral DNA; and (ii) the uracil found in proviruses made in the absence of UNG causes increased G-to-A mutations.
DISCUSSION
Previous studies have disagreed as to whether UNG is involved in the repair of APOBEC3-mediated cytidine deamination of retroviral DNA (reviewed in reference 38). However, many of these studies were done with overexpressed APOBEC3 or UNG proteins and used short-term replication assays to assess the effects of UNG. Here, we show by using an in vivo system, in which virus undergoes multiple rounds of replication, that UNG plays a role in removing the uracils introduced by APOBEC3G-mediated cytidine deamination into MLV proviruses. As we showed previously, an APOBEC3G transgene expressed at levels similar to those seen in humans introduces “catastrophic” G-to-A mutations into the coding strand of MLV-infected mice, reducing in vivo infection by several logs. In A3G transgenic mice that also lack Ung, the G-to-A mutation rate was increased to even higher levels, which resulted in lower levels of infection. Thus, UNG could be characterized as a proviral factor that aids in the repair of mutations introduced into the viral genome by the APOBEC3 cytidine deaminases. The fact that a lack of UNG did not cause even higher rates of mutation and greater effects on infection is likely due to the other BER enzymes that repair uracil in DNA, such as selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase (SMUG1), thymidine DNA glycosylase (TDG), and methyl CpG binding domain 4 (MBD4) (35).
In in vitro studies, incorporation of APOBEC3G into MLV particles reduced cytoplasmic and unintegrated reverse transcripts, as well as integrated DNA, independent of UNG expression compared with virions lacking APOBEC3G. This result is likely because APOBEC3G, in addition to deaminating newly synthesized viral DNA, can block reverse transcription (9). When APOBEC3G-containing MLV was used to infect tissue culture cells in which UNG levels were reduced by small interfering RNA (siRNA), the level of unintegrated nuclear DNA was similar in the UNG-expressing and -negative cells infected with APOBEC3G-containing MLV. In contrast, we found that integration of proviral DNA was increased in UNG-depleted cells relative to cells expressing UNG. Additionally, the level of uracil incorporated in nuclear unintegrated viral and proviral DNA was higher in the UNG-deficient cells than that in the UNG-expressing cells. This finding suggests that when UNG acts on unintegrated viral DNA, the cleavage sites are not repaired by the BER machinery, likely leading to nicked DNA that does not efficiently integrate. In contrast, proviruses containing uracil would be cleaved by UNG after integration and repaired using the cellular BER machinery; this process would not occur in UNG-deficient cells and could explain the higher G-to-A mutation rate in the A3Ghigh UNG−/− mice than in the A3Ghigh mice. The repair of uracil in integrated proviruses by UNG also explains why virus replication levels were higher in A3Ghigh APO−/− than A3Ghigh UNG−/−APO− mice. Although BER is known to be error prone, we did not see evidence of increased mutations other than G to A, suggesting that instead DNA polymerase recognized uracils as thymidines in the integrated proviruses during DNA replication.
The replication complexes of HIV, consisting of a viral capsid, reverse transcriptase, integrase, and nucleic acid, can enter the nucleus through an interaction with the nuclear pore, and as a result, HIV can infect quiescent cells (39). MLV, in contrast, requires cell division and nuclear membrane breakdown for complex entry because it lacks viral proteins that interact with the nuclear pore complex; it thus can only efficiently infect cycling cells (39). Recent studies have suggested that HIV reverse transcription occurs largely in the nucleus (40–43). Whether this is also the case for gammaretroviruses is not known. However, cytoplasmic viral DNA isolated from cells infected with APOBEC3G-containing virus had significant levels of uracil, suggesting that at least some reverse transcription occurs prior to the association of the reverse transcription complex (RTC) with the nucleus (Fig. 4D). However, the level of uracil in cytoplasmic DNA did not differ in UNG-containing and -depleted cells but did differ in the nuclear fractions. Thus, UNG, which is a nuclear enzyme, is likely removing uracils in the nucleus. Although UNG can remove uracils from double-stranded DNA, its activity is higher on single-stranded DNA, such as that that occurs at replication foci or during reverse transcription (35). If some reverse transcription and APOBEC3G-mediated deamination occurs in the nucleus or during cell division, then nuclear UNG could cause nicks in unintegrated viral DNA through base excision. Further studies are required to elucidate how and where MLV reverse transcription, APOBEC3G deamination, and UNG excision occur.
MATERIALS and METHODS
Ethics statement.
All mice were housed according to the policy of the Animal Care Committee of the University of Illinois at Chicago, and all studies were performed in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The experiments performed with mice in this study were approved by the committee (UIC ACC protocol no. 18-168).
Mice.
A3GhighAPO −/− mice and APO−/− mice were described previously (23, 29). UNG−/− mice were a generous gift from Amy Kenter (6). Conditions for genotyping the A3G transgene, as well as the mouse Apobec3 gene, were reported previously (23, 29). Knockout of the Ung gene was verified using the following primers: UNGKO F primer, 5′-GCCGGTCTTGTCGATCAGGATGATC-3′; and UNGKO R primer, 5′-CAGTGCCTATAACTTCAGCTCC-3′.
Cell culture.
NIH 3T3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), l-glutamine, and penicillin-streptomycin. 293T/mCAT-1 cells were a gift from Lorraine Albritton (44). 293T/A3G/mCAT-1 cells expressing human APOBEC3G were generated by cotransfecting A3G expression and puromycin-resistance plasmids. The 293T/mCAT-1 and 293T/A3G/mCAT-1 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 8% donor bovine serum (DBS), l-glutamine, and penicillin-streptomycin containing G418 (Goldbio) or G418 plus puromycin (Gibco), respectively.
Virus isolation.
MMLV was isolated from the supernatants of stably infected NIH 3T3 cells (cells in which infection is allowed to spread to 100% of the culture and maintained in this state thereafter), as described previously (25, 45). Virus was also isolated from MMLV-infected 293T/mCAT-1 and 293T/A3G/mCAT-1 cells. Supernatants were passed through a 0.45-μm filter, treated with 20 U/ml DNase I (Sigma) at 37°C for 30 min, and centrifuged through a 30% sucrose cushion, as described previously. After resuspension, titers of MMLV were determined on NIH 3T3 cells (see “Virus titers” below).
Viruses were subjected to reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), and the number of viruses was estimated by standard curve analysis from the amount of virus-specific RNA, using primers located in the env gene (SU F primer, 5′-CCTACTACGAAGGGGTTG-3′; SU R primer, 5′-CACATGGTACCTGTAGGGGC-3′). Equal amounts of virus, normalized by RNA levels, were also analyzed by Western blots (Fig. 4A).
In vivo infections.
One-to-2-day-old mice were infected by intraperitoneal injection of 2 × 103 infectious centers (ICs) of MMLV, and spleens were harvested at 16 days dpi, as described previously (17). Mice were anesthetized and blood was obtained via retro-orbital bleed. Plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected with heparinized Natelson tubes (Fisher Scientific) into 8 mM EDTA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Plasma samples were diluted serially to determine the virus titer. For cellular DNA isolation, red blood cells were lysed with ACK (Ammonium, Chloride, Potassium) lysis buffer (150 mM NH4Cl, 1 M KHCO3, and 0.1 mM EDTA [pH 7.4]), and cells were washed twice with PBS and finally diluted in 200 μl of PBS. Samples were stored at –20°C prior to DNA isolation.
Virus titers.
MMLV infection levels in the spleens and peripheral blood of the infected mice or the supernatants of infected NIH3T3, 293T/mCAT-1, and 293T/A3G/mCAT-1 cells were determined by infectious center (IC) assays using a focal immunofluorescence assay, as described previously (37). Briefly, NIH 3T3 cells were infected with 10-fold serial dilutions of splenocytes or virus. At 4 dpi, the plates were stained with a monoclonal antibody (538) that recognizes the Env protein. After plates were stained with fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody, the colonies of green cells were quantified by automated counting using a Keyence fluorescence microscope. Viral titers (ICs) were determined from the numbers of fluorescent colonies corrected for the dilution factors of the viral stocks in each plate.
Deep sequencing of nearly full-length MMLV genomic DNA and RNA.
DNA from the spleens of MLV-infected A3Ghigh APO−/− mice, A3Ghigh UNG−/−APO−/− mice, and APO−/−, UNG−/−APO−/−control mice was isolated using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen). RNA was also isolated from MMLV-infected splenocytes of the mice using TRIzol reagent (Ambion), and cDNA was reverse transcribed using the AccuScript high-fidelity first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Agilent Technologies). Three MMLV fragments that covered most of the proviral genome were amplified from DNA and RNA using the primers described in Table 1 (Fig. 2A; Table 1). Briefly, the three amplicons were purified (Agencourt AMPure XP) and quantified (Nanodrop) prior to using the Celero DNA-Seq library preparation kit (NuGEN) to construct libraries. These libraries were analyzed using a Tapestation 4200 system to determine size and concentration (Agilent Technologies). Libraries were then pooled based on nM concentration, and the resulting pool was prepared for sequencing by measuring concentration by using a Qubit 4 instrument (Life Technologies). The pooled libraries were run on an Illumina MiniSeq instrument at 2 × 150 bp using the MiniSeq reagent MO kit, (300 cycles) (no. FC-420-1004; Illumina Inc.).
TABLE 1.
Primers used to amplify MMLV proviral DNA and viral RNA genome
| Coverage (nt position) | Nucleic acid | Primer sequence (5′–3′) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward | Reverse | ||
| 1–2884 | DNA | GCCCTCAGCAGTTTCTAGAGAAC | CGTGTTCCAGGGGACTGGCA |
| 72–2884 | RNA | ACTTGTGGTCTCGCTGTTC | CGTGTTCCAGGGGACTGGCA |
| 2864–5944 | DNA/RNA | TGCCAGTCCCCCTGGAACAC | CGTCTCCCGATCTCCATTGG |
| 5925–8120 | DNA/RNA | CCAATGGAGATCGGGAGACG | GTTCTCTAGAAACTGCTGAGGGC |
Sequence analysis.
Raw reads were mapped to the Moloney murine leukemia virus (GenBank accession no. J02255) using BWA-MEM (46) (total mapped read average, 1.3 × 105). PCR duplicates were removed using Picard MarkDuplicates (47), and indel realignment was performed using IndelRealigner from GATK (48). Nucleotide counts per position were generated at each position in the reference using bam-readcount (Bam-Readcount: Generate Metrics at Single Nucleotide Positions). The effects of substitutions on the translated protein sequence were assessed for the open read frames in the virus at positions 621 to 2237 (Gag polyprotein pr65), positions 2238 to 5834 (Pol polyprotein), and 5777 to 7774 (Env polyprotein). Distributions of both single-nucleotide conversions and dinucleotide conversions were compiled over all positions in the genome, in particular G to A and C to T conversions for single nucleotides, and GG to AG, GC to AC, GA to AA, and GT to AT conversions for dinucleotides. These conversion frequencies were also averaged over 1-kb bins across the reference sequence. Differential statistics of conversion frequencies between sample groups were tested using the Wilcoxon test in R. G to A/kb, C to T/kb, and all mutations/kb calculations were made by counting the total number of G to A, C to T, or the rest of mutations and dividing these numbers between kb reads.
RNAi.
For the depletion of UNG in human cells, siRNA from Ambion (catalog no. 4390824) was used. Briefly, 293T/mCAT-1 and 293T/A3G/mCAT-1 were transfected using the reverse-transfection method of the Lipofectamine RNAi MAX reagent (Invitrogen). siRNA depletion was carried out for 48 h. RNA was isolated using the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen). RT-qPCR was performed using the GoTaq 1-step RT-qPCR system (Promega). Knockdowns were verified using the primers 5′-CTCATAAGGAGCGAGGCTGG-3′ and 5′-GTACATGGTGCCGCTTCCTA-3′.
In vitro infections to determine reverse transcription early events.
293T/mCAT-1 and 293T/A3G/mCAT-1 cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells per 0.5 ml of medium in a 24-well format. Virus (genome equivalent of a multiplicity of infection [MOI] of 1) was added in the presence of 8 μg/ml Polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich), and the cells were incubated on ice for 1 h to allow virus binding. Cells were washed in cold phosphate-buffered saline, 0.5 ml of DMEM was added, and cells were incubated at 37°C for 0 to 24 h, as indicated in the figures. At each harvest time point, the cells were fractionated by the modify rapid, efficient, and practical (REAP) method as described previously (49). Total, integrated, and cytoplasmic DNA was purified from the REAP fractions using DNeasy kits (Qiagen). The purity of the fractions was determined by Western blotting with antibodies to β-tubulin (cytoplasmic fraction) (GeneTex) and laminin B1 (nuclear fraction) (Cell Signaling Technology). Unintegrated nuclear DNA was isolated using the Hirt DNA isolation method, which is appropriate for extraction of low-molecular-weight DNA (50). Briefly, Hirt buffer (0.09 M Tris [pH 7.6], 0.01 M EDTA, and 0.6% SDS) was added to the REAP nuclear fraction and incubated for 10 minutes. Afterward, a 1/4 volume of 5.0 M NaCl was added and mixed gently. The lysis mixture was incubated at 4°C overnight. The mixture was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C, and then supernatant was carefully removed, mixed with proteinase K (0.1 mg/ml), and incubated at 56°C for 2 hours, followed by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The pellet was diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to isolate the integrated DNA. The DNA from the different fractions was subjected to real-time qPCR.
Real-time qPCR.
qPCRs were performed with MLV SuMLV primers using a Power SYBR green PCR kit (Promega) and the QuantStudio 5 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). DNA quantifications were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) or to the mitochondrial gene for cytochrome b (mtCytb) in the cytoplasmic fraction. The amplification conditions were 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 1 min. The efficiency of amplification was determined for each primer pair by generating a standard curve with 10-fold serial dilutions of a known concentration of DNA. For each primer pair, a no-template control was included, and each sample was run in triplicate. Levels of integrated MLV were determined by Alu-gag nested PCR (45). Briefly, 50 ng of total DNA was used to perform a PCR using a forward primer that targeted genomic alu sequences located randomly near integrated proviruses and an MLV-specific gag reverse primer (Alu-F: 5′-GCCTCCCAAAGTGCTGGGATTACAG-3′; Gag-R: 5′-TTCCGGGGTTTCTCGTTTAT-3′). The PCR product was diluted 10-fold, and 2.4 μl was used as input for the second qPCR, which was performed using MLV long terminal repeat (LTR) primers (LTR-F: 5′-CCTCCGATTGACTGAGTCGCCCC-3′; LTR-R: 5′-ATGAAAGACCCCCGCTGACGG-3′). The qPCR was normalized to GAPDH using the same amount of input total DNA sample to measure integrated MLV. Copies of unintegrated DNA were determined by qPCR with SuMLV primers and normalized to ng of total DNA in the sample.
Uracil content of viral DNA.
Excision qPCR was used to determine the uracil-containing fraction of viral DNA as described (51) with some modifications. The sample was split into two equal portions, and one portion was treated with UDG. Briefly, 0.125 units of LTR Escherichia coli uracil-DNA glycosylase (New England BioLabs [NEB]) was added into the Promega qPCR master mix to excise uracils from viral DNA. The qPCR thermocycler reaction was modified to include the UDG reaction time and heat cleavage of the resulting abasic sites. The thermocycler program we used for this reaction was 37°C for 30 min (UDG reaction), 95°C for 5 min (abasic site cleavage), 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 sec, and annealing and extension at 60°C for 30 sec. SuMLV primers were used in cytoplasmic, nuclear unintegrated, and integrated fraction to amplify viral DNA. Primers targeting GAPDH or mCytb were used to calculate the fraction of uracil-containing DNA (Frac U) using the threshold cycle (ΔΔCT) method in the nuclear or cytoplasmic fractions, respectively.
The Taq/Pfu PCR method was also used to examine DNA uracil content, as described (36). DNA from spleen at 16 dpi was used as the template for Taq and Pfu amplification with SuMLV primers.
Statistical analysis and data deposition.
Data shown are the averages of at least 3 independent experiments or as otherwise indicated in the figure legends. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0.2 software. Tests used to determine significance are indicated in the figure legends. Raw data for all figures are deposited as a Mendeley dataset at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/jmpdfkvd2j/2#:~:text=doi%3A%2010.17632/jmpdfkvd2j.2.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank David Ryan for assistance with mouse breeding, Alexya Aguilera for providing virus and helpful suggestions, and Amy Kenter for providing the UNG KO mice. Sequencing was performed at the DNA Services (DNAS) facility within the Research Resources Center (RRC) at UIC. Bioinformatics analysis described in the project was performed by the UIC Research Informatics Core, supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through grant UL1TR002003.
This study was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI 085015 to S.R.R.).
Contributor Information
Susan R. Ross, Email: srross@uic.edu.
Viviana Simon, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
REFERENCES
- 1.LaRue RS, Andresdottir V, Blanchard Y, Conticello SG, Derse D, Emerman M, Greene WC, Jonsson SR, Landau NR, Lochelt M, Malik HS, Malim MH, Munk C, O'Brien SJ, Pathak VK, Strebel K, Wain-Hobson S, Yu XF, Yuhki N, Harris RS. 2009. Guidelines for naming nonprimate APOBEC3 genes and proteins. J Virol 83:494–497. 10.1128/JVI.01976-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Peled JU, Kuang FL, Iglesias-Ussel MD, Roa S, Kalis SL, Goodman MF, Scharff MD. 2008. The biochemistry of somatic hypermutation. Annu Rev Immunol 26:481–511. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Iyama T, Wilson DM, III.. 2013. DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 12:620–636. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yonekura S, Nakamura N, Yonei S, Zhang-Akiyama QM. 2009. Generation, biological consequences and repair mechanisms of cytosine deamination in DNA. J Radiat Res 50:19–26. 10.1269/jrr.08080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Akbari M, Visnes T, Krokan HE, Otterlei M. 2008. Mitochondrial base excision repair of uracil and AP sites takes place by single-nucleotide insertion and long-patch DNA synthesis. DNA Repair (Amst) 7:605–616. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nilsen H, Stamp G, Andersen S, Hrivnak G, Krokan HE, Lindahl T, Barnes DE. 2003. Gene-targeted mice lacking the Ung uracil-DNA glycosylase develop B-cell lymphomas. Oncogene 22:5381–5386. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Slupphaug G, Eftedal I, Kavli B, Bharati S, Helle NM, Haug T, Levine DW, Krokan HE. 1995. Properties of a recombinant human uracil-DNA glycosylase from the UNG gene and evidence that UNG encodes the major uracil-DNA glycosylase. Biochemistry 34:128–138. 10.1021/bi00001a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cullen BR. 2006. Role and mechanism of action of the APOBEC3 family of antiretroviral resistance factors. J Virol 80:1067–1076. 10.1128/JVI.80.3.1067-1076.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stavrou S, Ross SR. 2015. APOBEC3 proteins in viral immunity. J Immunol 195:4565–4570. 10.4049/jimmunol.1501504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Daugherty MD, Malik HS. 2012. Rules of engagement: molecular insights from host-virus arms races. Annu Rev Genet 46:677–700. 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sheehy AM, Gaddis NC, Choi JD, Malim MH. 2002. Isolation of a human gene that inhibits HIV-1 infection and is suppressed by the viral Vif protein. Nature 418:646–650. 10.1038/nature00939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bishop KN, Holmes RK, Sheehy AM, Davidson NO, Cho SJ, Malim MH. 2004. Cytidine deamination of retroviral DNA by diverse APOBEC proteins. Curr Biol 14:1392–1396. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wiegand HL, Doehle BP, Bogerd HP, Cullen BR. 2004. A second human antiretroviral factor, APOBEC3F, is suppressed by the HIV-1 and HIV-2 Vif proteins. EMBO J 23:2451–2458. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liddament MT, Brown WL, Schumacher AJ, Harris RS. 2004. APOBEC3F properties and hypermutation preferences indicate activity against HIV-1 in vivo. Curr Biol 14:1385–1391. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zheng YH, Irwin D, Kurosu T, Tokunaga K, Sata T, Peterlin BM. 2004. Human APOBEC3F is another host factor that blocks human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication. J Virol 78:6073–6076. 10.1128/JVI.78.11.6073-6076.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cen S, Guo F, Niu M, Saadatmand J, Deflassieux J, Kleiman L. 2004. The interaction between HIV-1 Gag and APOBEC3G. J Biol Chem 279:33177–33184. 10.1074/jbc.M402062200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huthoff H, Autore F, Gallois-Montbrun S, Fraternali F, Malim MH. 2009. RNA-dependent oligomerization of APOBEC3G is required for restriction of HIV-1. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000330. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Apolonia L, Schulz R, Curk T, Rocha P, Swanson CM, Schaller T, Ule J, Malim MH. 2015. Promiscuous RNA binding ensures effective encapsidation of APOBEC3 proteins by HIV-1. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004609. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Burnett A, Spearman P. 2007. APOBEC3G multimers are recruited to the plasma membrane for packaging into human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virus-like particles in an RNA-dependent process requiring the NC basic linker. J Virol 81:5000–5013. 10.1128/JVI.02237-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Svarovskaia ES, Xu H, Mbisa JL, Barr R, Gorelick RJ, Ono A, Freed EO, Hu WS, Pathak VK. 2004. Human apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme-catalytic polypeptide-like 3G (APOBEC3G) is incorporated into HIV-1 virions through interactions with viral and nonviral RNAs. J Biol Chem 279:35822–35828. 10.1074/jbc.M405761200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Holmes RK, Koning FA, Bishop KN, Malim MH. 2007. APOBEC3F can inhibit the accumulation of HIV-1 reverse transcription products in the absence of hypermutation: comparisons with APOBEC3G. J Biol Chem 282:2587–2595. 10.1074/jbc.M607298200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sanchez-Martinez S, Aloia AL, Harvin D, Mirro J, Gorelick RJ, Jern P, Coffin JM, Rein A. 2012. Studies on the restriction of murine leukemia viruses by mouse APOBEC3. PLoS One 7:e38190. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Okeoma CM, Lovsin N, Peterlin BM, Ross SR. 2007. APOBEC3 inhibits mouse mammary tumour virus replication in vivo. Nature 445:927–930. 10.1038/nature05540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.MacMillan AL, Kohli RM, Ross SR. 2013. APOBEC3 inhibition of mouse mammary tumor virus infection: the role of cytidine deamination versus inhibition of reverse transcription. J Virol 87:4808–4817. 10.1128/JVI.00112-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stavrou S, Nitta T, Kotla S, Ha D, Nagashima K, Rein AR, Fan H, Ross SR. 2013. Murine leukemia virus glycosylated Gag blocks apolipoprotein B editing complex 3 and cytosolic sensor access to the reverse transcription complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:9078–9083. 10.1073/pnas.1217399110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stavrou S, Zhao W, Blouch K, Ross SR. 2018. Deaminase-dead mouse APOBEC3 is an in vivo retroviral restriction factor. J Virol 92:00168-18. [PMC] 10.1128/JVI.00168-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nair S, Sanchez-Martinez S, Ji X, Rein A. 2014. Biochemical and biological studies of mouse APOBEC3. J Virol 88:3850–3860. 10.1128/JVI.03456-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cadena C, Stavrou S, Manzoni T, Iyer SS, Bibollet-Ruche F, Zhang W, Hahn BH, Browne EP, Ross SR. 2016. The effect of HIV-1 Vif polymorphisms on A3G anti-viral activity in an in vivo mouse model. Retrovirology 13:45. 10.1186/s12977-016-0280-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stavrou S, Crawford D, Blouch K, Browne EP, Kohli RM, Ross SR. 2014. Different modes of retrovirus restriction by human APOBEC3A and APOBEC3G in vivo. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004145. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rulli SJ, Jr., Mirro J, Hill SA, Lloyd P, Gorelick RJ, Coffin JM, Derse D, Rein A. 2008. Interactions of murine APOBEC3 and human APOBEC3G with murine leukemia viruses. J Virol 82:6566–6575. 10.1128/JVI.01357-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kaiser SM, Emerman M. 2006. Uracil DNA glycosylase is dispensable for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication and does not contribute to the antiviral effects of the cytidine deaminase Apobec3G. J Virol 80:875–882. 10.1128/JVI.80.2.875-882.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yang B, Chen K, Zhang C, Huang S, Zhang H. 2007. Virion-associated uracil DNA glycosylase-2 and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease are involved in the degradation of APOBEC3G-edited nascent HIV-1 DNA. J Biol Chem 282:11667–11675. 10.1074/jbc.M606864200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Langlois MA, Neuberger MS. 2008. Human APOBEC3G can restrict retroviral infection in avian cells and acts independently of both UNG and SMUG1. J Virol 82:4660–4664. 10.1128/JVI.02469-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Weil AF, Ghosh D, Zhou Y, Seiple L, McMahon MA, Spivak AM, Siliciano RF, Stivers JT. 2013. Uracil DNA glycosylase initiates degradation of HIV-1 cDNA containing misincorporated dUTP and prevents viral integration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:E448–457. 10.1073/pnas.1219702110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sousa MM, Krokan HE, Slupphaug G. 2007. DNA-uracil and human pathology. Mol Aspects Med 28:276–306. 10.1016/j.mam.2007.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yan N, O'Day E, Wheeler LA, Engelman A, Lieberman J. 2011. HIV DNA is heavily uracilated, which protects it from autointegration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:9244–9249. 10.1073/pnas.1102943108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bruce JW, Hierl M, Young JA, Ahlquist P. 2010. Cellular transcription factor ZASC1 regulates murine leukemia virus transcription. J Virol 84:7473–7483. 10.1128/JVI.00299-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Goila-Gaur R, Strebel K. 2008. HIV-1, APOBEC, and intrinsic immunity. Retrovirol 5:51. 10.1186/1742-4690-5-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Matreyek KA, Engelman A. 2013. Viral and cellular requirements for the nuclear entry of retroviral preintegration nucleoprotein complexes. Viruses 5:2483–2511. 10.3390/v5102483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dharan A, Bachmann N, Talley S, Zwikelmaier V, Campbell EM. 2020. Nuclear pore blockade reveals that HIV-1 completes reverse transcription and uncoating in the nucleus. Nat Microbiol 5:1088–1095. 10.1038/s41564-020-0735-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Selyutina A, Persaud M, Lee K, KewalRamani V, Diaz-Griffero F. 2020. Nuclear import of the HIV-1 core precedes reverse transcription and uncoating. Cell Rep 32:108201. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li C, Burdick RC, Nagashima K, Hu WS, Pathak VK. 2021. HIV-1 cores retain their integrity until minutes before uncoating in the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2019467118. 10.1073/pnas.2019467118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Francis AC, Marin M, Singh PK, Achuthan V, Prellberg MJ, Palermino-Rowland K, Lan S, Tedbury PR, Sarafianos SG, Engelman AN, Melikyan GB. 2020. HIV-1 replication complexes accumulate in nuclear speckles and integrate into speckle-associated genomic domains. Nat Commun 11:3505. 10.1038/s41467-020-17256-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zavorotinskaya T, Qian Z, Franks J, Albritton LM. 2004. A point mutation in the binding subunit of a retroviral envelope protein arrests virus entry at hemifusion. J Virol 78:473–481. 10.1128/jvi.78.1.473-481.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fan H, Chute H, Chao E, Feuerman M. 1983. Construction and characterization of Moloney murine leukemia virus mutants unable to synthesize glycosylated gag polyprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:5965–5969. 10.1073/pnas.80.19.5965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv 1303.3997v1 [q-bio.GN]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997.
- 47.Levy S, Hannenhalli S. 2002. Identification of transcription factor binding sites in the human genome sequence. Mamm Genome 13:510–514. 10.1007/s00335-002-2175-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA. 2010. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20:1297–1303. 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Suzuki K, Bose P, Leong-Quong RY, Fujita DJ, Riabowol K. 2010. REAP: a two minute cell fractionation method. BMC Res Notes 3:294. 10.1186/1756-0500-3-294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hirt B. 1967. Selective extraction of polyoma DNA from infected mouse cell cultures. J Mol Biol 26:365–369. 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90307-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Meshesha M, Esadze A, Cui J, Churgulia N, Sahu SK, Stivers JT. 2020. Deficient uracil base excision repair leads to persistent dUMP in HIV proviruses during infection of monocytes and macrophages. PLoS One 15:e0235012. 10.1371/journal.pone.0235012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




