Skip to main content
Photoacoustics logoLink to Photoacoustics
. 2021 May 26;23:100273. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100273

The feasibility study of the transmission mode photoacoustic measurement of human calcaneus bone in vivo

Ting Feng a,1, Yunhao Zhu a,1, Richard Morris b, Kenneth M kozloff a,c,*, Xueding Wang a,d,*
PMCID: PMC8552339  PMID: 34745881

Abstract

The photoacoustic (PA) technique is uniquely positioned for biomedical applications primarily due to its ability to visualize optical absorption contrast in deep tissue at ultrasound resolution. In this work, via both three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulations and in vivo experiments on human subjects, we investigated the possibility of PA measurement of human calcaneus bones in vivo in a non-invasive manner, as well as its feasibility to differentiate osteoporosis patients from normal subjects. The results from the simulations and the experiments both demonstrated that, when one side of the heel is illuminated by laser with light fluence under the ANSI safety limit, the PA signal generated in the human calcaneus bone can be detected by an ultrasonic transducer at the other side of the heel (i.e. transmission mode). Quantitative power spectral analyses of the calcaneus bone PA signals were also conducted, demonstrating that the microarchitectural changes in calcaneus bone due to osteoporosis can be detected, as reflected by enhanced high frequency components in detected PA bone signal. Further statistical analysis of the experimental results from 10 osteoporosis patients and 10 healthy volunteers showed that the weighted frequency as a quantified PA spectral parameter can differentiate the two subject groups with statistical significance.

Keywords: Photoacoustic measurement, Tissue characterization, Bone microarchitecture, Osteoporosis, Three-dimensional simulation

1. Introduction

Osteoporosis has been defined as a systemic skeletal disease that is characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD) and bone microarchitectural (BMA) deterioration, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture [1]. Clinically available diagnostic technologies for osteoporosis rely on either X-rays or ultrasound (US) [[2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), commonly considered as the gold standard diagnostic technology for osteoporosis, incompletely describes the fracture risk with limited accuracy. This is because DEXA, as an areal-based measurement of bone mineral, provides only a measure of BMD; while other essential parameters, such as BMA and material properties, are not assessed [1]. In addition, X-ray based techniques involve ionizing radiation which is a concern especially for repeated use in long-term longitudinal monitoring. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques provide a practical and low-cost substitute for DEXA, and have already led to clinical instruments [14,15]. QUS assessment of bone structure and strength is mainly based on the measurement of speed of sound (SOS) and broadband ultrasonic attenuation (BUA), both strongly correlated with BMD but less reflective of BMA and bone chemical properties [[16], [17], [18]].

Recent developments in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have demonstrated the feasibility and diagnostic relevance of characterizing not only BMA but also bone metabolic processes at the molecular level [19]. MRI has the potential to investigate several aspects of bone physiology that are not captured by DEXA, including marrow fat content, perfusion, and molecular diffusion [[20], [21], [22]]. Bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) has been proposed as a biomarker predictive of osteoporosis-associated bone loss and even skeletal fragility [23]. Besides BMAT, bone perfusion is another physiological biomarker reflecting bone health. Several studies have demonstrated that the perfusion indices from MRI are significantly decreased in osteoporotic subjects compared with osteopenic subjects or those with normal bone density [20,21]. While metabolic processes in bone can be measured using MRI, the high cost, limited availability and accessibility of MRI preclude this technique from point-of-care implementation.

Biomedical photoacoustic (PA) technologies have drawn considerable attention in the last decades, and have been explored extensively for many preclinical and clinical applications [[24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]]. In prior studies, the method of detecting backscattered PA signals has been explored for assessing ex vivo bone structure and density [32,33]. Researchers characterized the PA waves in the frequency domain with multiple optical wavelengths, which allowed assessment of the gross biochemical composition in the cortical bone, the SOS dispersion, and the BUA [34,35]. In a study based on leukemic mouse models, it was confirmed that the PA imaging could reliably assess the changes in bone marrow oxygenation which is an emerging imaging biomarker for understanding many hematological diseases manifested as bone marrow failure [36]. Through a study on a rat model of estrogen-deficient bone loss and drug-induced preservation, our group investigated the feasibility of evaluating bone chemical properties using thermal photoacoustic measurement [37]. In another study on the same animal model, we found that, by performing photoacoustic spectrum analysis (PASA), the dynamic changes of BMA can be evaluated [38]. Recently, in a study in human subjects by using a dual-modality multispectral PA system, in vivo measurement of the blood/fat ratio in the marrow of the long bone was demonstrated [39]. As suggested by all these prior studies, PA techniques can measure not only the parameters associated with non-organic minerals, such as BMD and BMA, but also the contents and distributions of organic components such as collagen, hemoglobin, and lipid in bone. Based on the highly sensitive optical absorption contrast, PA techniques, with costs much lower than MRI, hold great potential to assess the metabolic processes in bone at the molecular level.

In this study, to pave the road toward clinical applications, we investigated the feasibility of transmission mode PA measurement of human calcaneus bone in vivo in a non-invasive manner. Understanding of the PA signal from the calcaneus bone was investigated via three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulations which considered light distribution, PA signal generation, and PA signal propagation in both soft tissue and bone. In parallel, we also conducted experiments on human calcaneus bone in vivo, and measured two groups of subjects including 10 osteoporosis patients and 10 healthy volunteers as the control.

2. Theory

2.1. Light fluence in bone

Light diffusion in an optically scattering medium such as bone can be simply calculated using the diffusion approximation [40],

Qr=μarΦr-DrΦr (1)

where Q denotes the source, μa denotes the absorption coefficient, and Φr denotes the fluence. When μsμa and in a nearly isotropic medium [40], the diffusion coefficient D is given by

D=13μs',μs'=μs(1-g) (2)

where μs is the scattering coefficient, μs' is the reduced scattering coefficient, and g is the anisotropy factor. If the scale of the optical micro-heterogeneities is smaller than a few photon transport mean free paths, light fluence is smooth and can be characterized by a macro-homogeneous medium model. For a homogeneous medium [i.e. D(r)=D,μar=μa,μs'(r)=μs'] and a point source [i.e. Qr=δ(r-r')], the solution of the diffusion equation using Green’s function is given as

Φr=14πD|r-r'|exp(-μeff|r-r'|) (3)

where μeff=3μaμs' is the effective attenuation coefficient, and r' is the spatial position of the source.

When the boundary between medium I and II is refractive index matched and the source to medium I is located at the interface, the boundary condition is expressed as

Φr-2DΦrz=0 (4)

When the boundary between medium I and II is refractive index mismatched, the boundary condition is expressed as

Φr-2D1+RJ1-RΦΦrz=0 (5)

where RΦ = 0π2sinθcosθR(cosθ)dθ, and RJ = 0π23sinθ(cosθ)2R(cosθ)dθ [40].

2.2. Photoacoustic signal generation in bone

The initial pressure P0 generated in the soft tissue/bone matrix induced by the absorption of optical radiation under the conditions of both thermal confinement and stress confinement can be written as Eqs. (6) and (7) [37]:

P0(r)≈Γ∙μa∙Φ (r), for soft tissue, (6)
P0r≈Γ1+ρa∙caρs∙cs∙μa∙Φ (r), for bone matrix. (7)

Eq. (7) considers the difference in acoustic impedance between the hard tissue and the coupling medium. In Eqs. (6) and (7), Γ is the Grüneisen parameter and can be written as Γ=βc2Cp, where β is the isobaric volume expansion coefficient in  K−1, Cp is the heat capacity per unit mass in J K−1 kg−1, c is the SOS of the material in m/s; μa is the absorption coefficient in  cm−1; Φ(r) is the local light fluence in J/cm2; ca and cs are the SOS of the bone matrix and the coupling medium, respectively; ρa and ρs are the density of the bone matrix and the coupling medium, respectively.

2.3. Photoacoustic signal propagation in bone

The calcaneus bone is a complex elastic medium that combines both soft tissue and hard tissue. A cortical shell surrounds trabecular bone which is an anisotropic, heterogeneous and two-phase medium made of a complex network of interconnected solid plates or trabeculae saturated by marrow. In biological tissue, the laser induced PA pressure acts as an acoustic source and initiates further acoustic waves combining both compressional and shear waves propagation in a 3D space. In soft tissue, such as skin and marrow, ultrasound shear waves are usually neglected because shear waves are highly attenuated at ultrasonic frequencies. However, in hard tissue, such as cortical bone and trabeculae, both the compressional and shear waves must be considered. Therefore, in our simulation of PA signal propagation in human calcaneus bone, both the compressional and the shear waves were taken into consideration.

2.4. Photoacoustic spectral analysis (PASA)

The PASA method [41,42] used in this study is similar to our previous work based on a small-animal rat model [38], both studying the power spectra density PSDf of the PA signal pt acquired from bone tissue as shown in Eq. (8):

PSDf=(FFTpt)2 (8)

In our previous work, after getting the power spectra density of the PA signal, a linear fit was performed which led to a quantified spectral parameter slope. In this study in human subject, a different spectral parameter, weighted frequency, is generated for the PA signal from each calcaneus bone by using the following equation:

W=f1f2PSDffdf (9)

where f1 and f2 give the frequency range for integration.

3. 3D numerical simulations and experiments

3.1. Digital samples of human calcaneus bone

A calcaneus bone specimen from a cadaver donor with unknown age and gender was used in this study. The bone specimen was degassed and immerged in distilled water, and scanned by a micro-CT (Skyscan 1076, Skyscan, Antwerp, Belgium) for imaging the microstructures. The bone specimen was scanned using a 1-mm aluminum filter with the following settings: voxel size 18 μm, voltage 75 kV, and current 130 μA. Data were recorded every 0.8° of rotation up to 180°. Reconstruction was done using NRecon software (version1.6.9.8, Skyscan, Antwerp, Belgium) with attenuation data translated into 8-bit grayscale. A cuboid volume of interest (approximately 50 mm in each dimension) within the center of the bone specimen was delineated for data analysis. Fig. 1(a) shows the 3D microarchitecture of the calcaneus bone specimen reconstructed by the ImageJ software, and Fig. 1(b) shows the superior region [43] used for analyzing the parameter of bone volume/total volume (BV/TV). To generate digital bone samples with different levels of BV/TV, the 3D micro-CT image of the calcaneus bone was binarized with the threshold of 55 by using Matlab software as shown in Fig. 1(d), and then processed by image dilation which can increase the trabecular thickness and generate a stronger bone model as shown in Fig. 1(c). Fig. 1(c) shows the cross-sections of the binarized 3D image with the white area showing the trabeculae and the dark area showing the pores. The quantified parameter BV/TV at the superior region is 36.81 % which is consistent with the previously obtain BV/TV of human calcaneus bones at ages within the range of 20–30 years [43]]. Fig. 1(d) shows the cross-sections of another binarized 3D image using a threshold of 55 which leads to a BV/TV at the superior region of 18.76 %, consistent with the previously obtained BV/TV of human calcaneus bones at ages of >50 years [43]].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Digital samples of human calcaneus bone generated from 3D micro-CT results. (a) 3D microarchitecture of a human calcaneus bone reconstructed by a micro-CT. (b) The superior region used for analyzing the parameter of bone volume/total volume (BV/TV). (c) and (d) The cross-sections of the binarized 3D micro-CT images of the human calcaneus bone using different thresholds in binarizing process. BV/TV is 34.28 % for (c), representing the healthy condition; BV/TV is 18.76 % for (d), representing the osteoporosis condition.

The digital bone specimens in Fig. 1 were used in numerical simulations. The whole bone thickness along the Z direction shown in Fig. 1 was approximately 30 mm. In simulations, we also added 7-mm thick soft tissue at each side to cover the bone entirely, as shown in Fig. 2(a). In addition, we added bone marrow component to fill the pores in the trabecular bone in simulations.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(a) 3D numerical simulation modeling. PML represents the perfectly matched layer. (b) The section view of the modeling geometry. (c) The process of the 3D numerical simulation.

3.2. 3D modeling

In this study, PA signal measurement was in the transmission mode. The light source and transducer were at opposite sides of the bone, as shown in Fig. 2(a). PML represents the perfectly matched layer. The process of the 3D numerical simulation is shown in Fig. 2(c).

3.3. 3D simulation of light distribution in bone

To simulate the light distribution in the digital bone specimen and the soft tissue, we used the NIRFAST-MATLAB 9.1 toolbox (Dartmouth College, Univ. of Birmingham and Kitware Inc.) [44], [45]. The digital samples of human calcaneus bone were imported into the MATLAB workplace, and then the images were downsampled to decrease the digital size (or numbers of pixels) for each image without changing their physical sizes. The digital 3D model for ultrasound simulation had a grid size of 50 × 50 × 50 mm3, where each grid cube represents 0.016 mm3. The model contained three components which were water, soft tissue, and bone (combining both bone matrix and bone marrow). At 690-nm laser wavelength, μa and μs' were set as 10 cm−1 and 0.001 cm−1 for PML, 0.06 cm−1 and 15.0 cm−1 for the 20–30 years old bone [46], 0.09 cm−1 and 13.00 cm−1 for >50 years old bone [46], and 0.12 cm−1 and 14.8 cm−1 for soft tissue [47], as shown in Table 1. The optical source was set as a disk field source with a diameter of 15 mm at the center of the x–y plane.

Table 1.

Material parameters used in simulations of light distribution.

20∼30 years old
(#1 bone)
> 50 years old
(#2 bone)
Soft tissue Perfectly matched layer (PML)
μa (cm−1) 0.06 0.09 0.12 10
μs' (cm−1) 15.00 13.00 14.80 0
Cuboid size
(x mm, y mm, z mm)
50 × 50 × 50 50 × 50 × 50 50 × 50 × 50 50 × 50 × 50

The 3D numerical simulation of the light distribution in bone is shown in Fig. 3. Fig. 3(a) shows the 3D light distribution in a projection view. Fig. 3(b) shows the 2D cross-sectional view of the light distribution. Fig. 3(c) shows 1D light distribution as a function of depth in the bone. The light fluence has -8.5 dB attenuation through the 7-mm thick soft tissue, and then has -28.7 dB to -31.6 dB attenuation when passing through the 30-mm thick bone.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

3D simulation of the light distribution in the bone and the covering soft tissue. (a) Projection view of the light distribution. (b) The light distribution along the center cross section. (c) Optical attenuation in the bone and the covering soft tissue as a function of depth. The results from the 20-30 years old bone and the >50 years old bone are compared.

3.4. 3D simulations of PA signal generation and propagation

In 3D simulations of PA signal generation and propagation, we used the elastic wave model provided by the open-source k-Wave MATLAB toolbox [48]. The propagation medium was isotropic and homogeneous with different propagation speeds, densities, and coefficients of ultrasound attenuation for water, soft tissue, and bone, respectively, as shown in Table 2 [[49], [50], [51]]. The three-dimensional grid was made of 200, 200, and 400 points along the x (elevation), y (azimuth), and z (depth) directions, respectively. The spatial step size was 0.25 mm in all three directions. Hence, the grid had a dimension of 50 mm along x-axis, 50 mm along y-axis, and 100 mm along z-axis. The transducer was set as 24.5 mm in diameter, placed at z = 68.3 mm and centered in the corresponding x–y plane. In addition, a PML was set around the computational domain, with 20 points thick (5 mm) along each of the x, y, and z directions. This PML ensured that no signal was reflected from the domain boundaries. The simulated PA signal was a 1-cycle sine wave of frequency 3 MHz, weighted by a Gaussian window. The signal propagation lasted for 60 μs in simulation, which allowed the signal to travel through and beyond the specified domain.

Table 2.

Material parameters using in simulations of PA signal generation and propagation.

Cortical bone Trabeculae Bone marrow Soft tissue Water
Density (g/cm3) 1900 1800 900 900 1000
SOS of compression
wave (m/s)
4000 2000 1540 1540 1500
SOS of shear
wave (m/s)
2000 1500 0 0 0
α coefficient of
compression wave
10 10 0.02 0.02 0.02
α coefficient of
shear wave
12 17 0 0 0
Cuboid size
(x mm, y mm, z mm)
50 × 50 × 100 50 × 50 × 100 50 × 50 × 100 50 × 50 × 100 50 × 50 × 100

The results of the laser-induced compressional wave and shear wave propagation maps along different views are shown in Fig. 4(a)–(c) and (e)–(g), respectively. This result is a snapshot of the compressional wave and the shear wave at the time of 35 μs after laser illumination. The whole PA signal profile combining both the compressional wave and the shear wave received by the transducer is shown in the Fig. 4(d). The signal from the bone, marked as region of interest (ROI), is enlarged and shown in Fig. 4(h).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

3D simulation of the PA signal propagation in a human calcaneus bone. (a-c) The compressional wave in the x-y plane, x-z plane, and y-z plane, respectively, at 35 μs after laser illumination. (e-g) The shear wave in the x-y plane, x-z plane, and y-z plane, respectively, at 35 μs after laser illumination. (d) 3D simulation result of the PA signal, including both compressional and shear wave, generated in the bone and received by the ultrasound transducer. (h) Enlarged PA signal amplitude to better show the profile of the signal generated in the bone as marked by ROI.

Although the PA signal from a human calcaneus bone received by the transducer in the transmission mode can contain both compressional wave and shear wave, the contribution from the shear wave is minimal. This is mainly due to the fact that the shear wave attenuation in trabecular bone is very high, at approximately 17 dB/mm at 1 MHz according to a previous study [49]. Hence, the shear wave propagation in human calcaneus, as shown in Fig. 4(e)–(g), is mostly along the cortical layer. Human calcaneus bone has a thin cortical layer about 1 mm [52,53]. As a result, the shear wave propagation along the cortical layer not only is inefficient but also leads to a delay in arrival time when compared to the compressional wave.

3.5. In-vivo experiments on human subjects

The experimental data analyzed in this work were from our clinical study on 20 human subjects that has been previously reported [54]. The objective of our previous paper was to demonstrate the feasibility of PA measurement, when aided by QUS, for assessment of human bone healthy. With a focus on characterizing lipid and marrow clusters in bone, PASA were performed at 930-nm and 800-nm wavelengths, respectively. In this work, the main purpose of analyzing the experimental data is to confirm the findings from the 3D modeling and validate that non-invasive PA measurement of human calcaneus bone in the transmission mode is feasible. The PASA in this work was conducted at 690-nm wavelength. According to our previous studies [37,55], both hydroxyapatite and hemoglobin contribute to the optical absorption of trabecular bone at this wavelength. Hence, PASA at 690 nm reflects the bone microarchitecture formed by both trabeculae and bone marrow. To differentiate their contributions, multi-wavelength PA measurement powered by spectral unmixing methods may be utilized in the future.

In the control group, 10 young, healthy female volunteers aged 20–30 years old were enrolled. The osteoporosis group including 10 female subjects aged 50 years or older were recruited through the University of Michigan Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Fragility Fracture Clinic. All subjects in the osteoporosis group were diagnosed with osteopenia or osteoporosis, as confirmed by DEXA [54]. Subjects in the control group also received DEXA. In our simulation study, the micro-CT images served as the ground truth for bone microstructures. Micro-CT, however, is not a clinically available tool for osteoporotic patients. Therefore, DEXA was involved in our experimental study as the clinical standard to validate the pathologic conditions of the osteoporosis patients, and to confirm the difference between the two subject groups involved. All procedures in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan School of Medicine (IRB: HUM00105987, Assessment of bone health with light and sound. PI: Kozloff). The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 5(a)–(c). Using the transmission mode, the light illumination was from the lateral side of the heel, and the ultrasound transducer received the PA signal from the medial side.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The experimental setup and the system calibration for the in vivo study on human subjects. (a)-(c) The experimental setup for PA measurement of a human calcaneus bone. By measuring the laser-induced PA signal from a 200-μm microbead, as shown in (d), the frequency response of the PA detection system was calibrated, as shown in (e).

In the PA measurement, an Nd:YAG laser pumped OPO (Phocus MOBILE, OPOTEK Inc.) was used to provide laser pulses with a repetition rate of 10 Hz and a pulse width of 5 ns. The laser beam was approximately 1.5 cm in diameter, with the pulse energy less than 45 mJ, which led to a laser light fluence of about 19 mJ/cm2 on the skin surface, well below the ANSI safety limit of 20 mJ/cm2 at 690 nm. The ultrasound transducer (Olympus, V301-SU) used for PA signal detection was unfocused, with 0.5-MHz central frequency, 1-inch diameter. Despite the fact that the initial pressure generated by the light absorption in bone tissue is broadband, due to the strong acoustic attenuation in the bone especially in the high frequency range, most of the PA signals received by the transducer are lower than 1 MHz. Hence, using a low frequency transducer for signal detection, as the one used in this study, can enhance the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). After the PA signal was received by the transducer, it was amplified first with a 46-dB low-noise signal preamplifier (NF, SA-220F5) and then with another 40-dB amplifier (Pulse/receiver 5072PR) before being digitized and saved by an oscilloscope (Tektronix MSO54). A signal averaging over 300 laser pulses was conducted to further improve the SNR.

3.6. Calibration of the PA bone measurement system

We calibrated the piezoelectric conversion coefficient of the transducer used in our PA system by using a calibrated broadband Onda hydrophone (Onda Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The piezoelectric conversion coefficient of the transducer was measured and calculated to be 2.2 × 10−3 V/Pa at central frequency of 0.5 MHz. In addition, we calibrated the frequency response of the transducer by measuring the PA signal generated from a microbead with a diameter of 200 μm, as shown in Fig. 5(d). The diameter of microbead was much smaller than the resolution of the utilized transducer working at a central frequency of 0.5 MHz. In this case, the microbead can be considered as a point object, and the frequency spectrum of the PA signal generated by the microbead and detected by the transducer was mainly determined by the frequency response of the transducer. The calibrated frequency response of the transducer is shown in Fig. 5(e).

4. Results and discussions

Based on the 3D modeling of light distribution and PA signal propagation, we simulated the PA signal reaching to the position of the transducer. Then, we applied the transducer response to the PA signal obtained in 3D modeling to simulate the PA signal detected by the transducer, as the results shown in Fig. 6(a). The lateral soft tissue near the light source has a very large signal amplitude, while the medial bone and the soft tissue near the ultrasound transducer have a much lower signal amplitude. Working in the transmission mode, the peak-to-peak value (PPV) of PA signal from the calcaneus bone was in the range of 0.11−0.15 Pa when reaching at the transducer surface. Hence, as demonstrated by the simulation results, even penetrating through the soft tissue and the whole calcaneus bone, the light is still strong enough to generate detectable PA signal in a human calcaneus bone. We also calculated the power spectrum density (PSD) of the PA signal marked as ROI (400 time points which is about 8 cycles) in Fig. 6(a), as well as the calibrated PSD after removing the frequency response of the transducer. The PSD curves before and after calibration from the two different digital bone samples (i.e. simulated 20–30 years old and simulated >50 years old) are shown in Fig. 6(b) and (c), respectively, both normalized at 0.1 MHz.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Comparison between the 3D simulation results (upper panel) and the in vivo experimental results (lower panel). (a) 3D numerical simulation results of the PA signals from the two digital bone samples with different levels of bone volume/total volume (BV/TV), one representing the condition of healthy bone (i.e. 20-30 years old) and the other representing the condition of osteoporosis bone (i.e. > 50 years old). The signals from the calcaneus bone are marked by ROI. (b) The corresponding power spectrum density (PSD) curves of the PA signals from the two digital bone samples. (c) The calibrated PSD curves of the two digital bone samples. (d) The PA signals acquired from the heels of a healthy volunteer and an osteoporosis patient, respectively. The signals from the calcaneus bone are marked by ROI. (e) The corresponding power spectrum density (PSD) curves of the PA signals from the calcaneus bones of the two subjects. (f) The calibrated PSD curves of the PA signals from the calcaneus bones of the two subjects.

The PA signals acquired in vivo from the heels of a randomly selected healthy volunteer and an osteoporosis patient are shown in Fig. 6(d). The PA signal profiles observed in the experiments are similar to that from the simulations. Due to the strong light attenuation, the PA signal generated by the soft tissue at the light illumination side was very strong, while the PA signal generated in the bone, as marked in the grey box, and the PA signal generated in the soft tissue at the transducer detection side were much lower. The PPV of the PA signals from the human calcaneus bones measured in vivo were in the range of 0.01−0.25 Pa, which has the same order of magnitude as the simulation results. Furthermore, we calculated the PSD and calibrated PSD of the acquired PA signals marked as ROI in Fig. 6(d) (400 time points which is about 8 cycles) for the healthy control and the osteoporosis patient, as shown in Fig. 6(e) and (f), respectively. In these experimental results, the center frequencies of the PSD and calibrated PSD from the calcaneus bones were 0.2−0.5 MHz which is also consistent with the simulation results. In addition, both the simulation and the experimental results demonstrated that the PSD, both before and after calibration, of the PA signals from the osteoporosis calcaneus bones with lower BV/TV had stronger high frequency components when compared to the results from the healthy bones with higher BV/TV.

To understand whether this observed difference in PSD can differentiate the two subject groups, we further quantitatively analyzed the PSD curves. For each normalized PSD curve, either before or after calibration, a quantified spectral parameter namely weighted frequency was acquired via an integration of the spectral power over the range of 0.1−0.74 MHz, as marked in Fig. 6(e)(f). Setting the cut-off frequency at 0.1 MHz avoided the strong low frequency noise, while the upper limit of 0.74 MHz was the -20 dB cut-off frequency of the transducer used in the experiments. For each subject, the weighted frequencies quantified from the PA measurements of the two feet were averaged first, leading to a single data point for each patient. Then with the weighted frequencies measured from all the involved subjects, the mean and the standard deviation for the healthy control group are compared to those for the osteoporosis group, as shown in Fig. 7(a) and (b). An unpaired two-tailed independent samples t-test (with Welch’s correction in cases of unequal variances) was conducted by using the GraphPad Prism 7.0 software to analyze the results in Fig. 7(a) (from non-calibrated PSD curves) and Fig. 7(b) (from calibrated PSD curves) individually. Both t-tests led to p < 0.01, indicating that the weighted frequencies as a quantified spectral parameter can differentiate the two groups with statistical significant difference. In addition, we also examined if there is any difference in PA signal pressure as quantified by the PPV between the two subject groups, as shown in Fig. 7(c). Although the PA signal pressure from the calcaneus bone in the osteoporosis group seems higher than that in the healthy control group, the unpaired two-tailed independent samples t-test did not lead to statistically significant difference.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

(a) and (b) The weighted frequencies quantified from PA measurements of the calcaneus bones from the control group vs. the osteoporosis group. (a) shows the results quantified from the non-calibrated PSD curves, while (b) shows the results from the calibrated PSD curves. (c) The quantified signal amplitudes (PPV) of PA measurements of the calcaneus bones from the control group vs. the osteoporosis group. p value was calculated for each unpaired two-tailed independent samples t-test.

To further confirm the pathological conditions of the osteoporosis group and its difference in bone quality compared to the healthy control group, a T-score value was derived from the DEXA femur images of each subject. Fig. 8 shows the ages and T-score values for all the involved human subjects, including the control data marked in blue and the osteoporosis data marked in red. An unpaired two-tailed independent samples t-test comparing the T-scores from the two subject groups was conducted, as shown in Fig. 8(b), leading to p < 0.001. In addition, we also studied the correlation between the weighted frequency and the T-score results, as shown in Fig. 8(c). The quantified Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient Rs =-0.57 suggests a moderate correlation between the weighted frequencies from the PA measurements and the T-score results from the DEXA of the femur bones involved in this study.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

(a) The ages and the T-scores of all involved human subjects, including healthy volunteers (blue circles) and osteoporosis patients (red triangles). (b) The statistical analysis results of the T-scores from femur for the control group and the osteoporosis group. p < 0.001 was achieved for unpaired two-tailed independent samples t-test. (c) Studying the correlation between weighted frequencies from PA measurements of calcaneus bones and the T-scores from the DEXA of femur bones. Rs=-0.57 suggests a moderate correlation.

5. Conclusions and discussions

In this study, the feasibility of non-invasive PA measurement of human calcaneus bone in vivo in the transmission mode was investigated through both 3D numerical simulations and the experiments on human subjects. In simulations, the light distribution in the heel, the PA signal generation and propagation, and the transducer’s response were considered. In experiments, PA measurements were conducted on total of 20 human subjects, including 10 healthy volunteers with ages in 20–30 years old and 10 osteoporosis patients with ages >50 years old. The results from the simulations and the experiments have a good match, as reflected by the similarities in PA signal profiles in both time and frequency domains. Both results suggest that, when working in the transmission mode using light fluence within the ANSI safety limit, the light can penetrate through the covering soft tissue and generate detectable PA signal in a human calcaneus bone.

In addition, the results from both simulations and experiments suggest that the PA signals from the calcaneus bones in the osteoporosis group contain stronger high frequency components. To examine whether this difference noticed in PA power spectrum can be used as a new parameter to assess the change in BMA resulting from osteoporosis, quantitative analyses of the PSD of the PA signals from the two subject groups were later conducted. The results from the 20 subjects demonstrated that the quantified PA spectral parameter weighted frequency can differentiate the control group and the osteoporosis group with statistical significant difference.

The concept used in this study on human subjects is similar to that in our previous work in small-animal rat model [38]. Both of these two studies aim at evaluating osteoporosis related changes in bone microarchitecture by performing spectral analysis of photoacoustic signals from bone. The detailed methods to achieve PASA of human calcaneus bones and PASA of rat femur bones, however, are different. This is mainly because that both the micro-size and the macro-size of human calcaneus bone are different from those of rat femur bone. First, human bones have relatively larger trabeculae and pores than rat bones. These optically absorbing structures with larger micro-sizes, under the illumination of laser pulses, generate lower frequency PA signals. To match the power spectrum of the generated PA signals from bone, the PASA in this study of human subjects was performed over a low frequency range (i.e. 0−1 MHz) instead of the high frequency range (i.e. 0−20 MHz) utilized for our previous study in rat model. Second, human calcaneus bones as well as the covering soft tissues also have much larger macro-sizes compared to those of the rats. The larger tissue sizes especially the bone size lead to stronger ultrasound attenuation. Because the ultrasound attenuation in bone is highly dependent on the ultrasound frequency, after propagating through the human calcaneus bone, the PA signals detected in the transmission mode are mostly low frequency and narrow in bandwidth. Hence, a low frequency transducer, such as the one used in this study, can provide optimal sensitivity for PA signal detection.

Besides the difference in detecting transducers, the methods for PASA were also different. In our previous study in the rat model, the PASA was conducted by performing a linear fit of the PA signal power spectrum, which then led a quantified spectral parameter slope. This slope reflects the ratio between the high frequency and the low frequency components in the PA signal. Hence, its accuracy is relevant to the frequency range of the detected PA signal. This is not a problem for our previous study in the rat mode where a large detection frequency range of 0−20 MHz was realized, but could be concern for this study in human subjects where the detection frequency was 0−1 MHz. Therefore, in this study, a different PA spectral parameter, weighted frequency, was quantified from the PA measurement of each human calcaneus bone. Compared with the spectral parameter slope, weighted frequency is more suitable for analyzing PA power spectrum with a narrow frequency range.

As shown in Figs. 7 and 8, the p value achieved by PASA in differentiating the two subject groups is not as good as that achieved by the T-score from DEXA (p = 0.0086 vs. p < 0.001). DEXA, however, is solely based on the measurement of BMD; while BMA, as another important parameter reflecting bone strength, is not assessed. PASA, as demonstrated in this study, offers a new method to characterize BMA. Working in the same transmission mode, PA measurement can be easily combined with the existing QUS to assess multiple physical properties of human calcaneus bone simultaneously. Besides bone physical properties, PA measurement of bone can also be performed at multiple laser wavelengths to characterize additional chemical and molecular properties. All these diagnostic information are highly valuable for understanding bone healthy and underlying physiological conditions.

With the capability to assess human bone health at a low cost, in a non-invasive and non-ionizing manner, PA technique can be developed into a point-of-care tool for clinical diagnosis and treatment assessment of osteoporosis and other bone conditions. Before clinical applications can be possible, however, some further developments are necessary. First, the sensitivity of the PA bone measurement system should be further improved to enhance the SNR, especially at the high frequency range. This can be realized by optimizing the laser illumination pattern and light fluence on the skin surface, utilizing a custom-designed transducer with further improve receiving sensitivity and frequency range, and designing dedicated signal amplification and digitization circuit. With the SNR and the frequency range of the PA signal from human calcaneus bone improved, the sensitivity and specificity of PA technique in characterizing bone microarchitecture and possible chemical and molecular properties can be further elevated. Second, the impact of the difference in the overlying soft tissue thickness on PASA of bone microarchitecture was ignored in 3D numerical simulations. Considering that the ultrasound attenuation in soft tissue is low at the frequency range of 0−1 MHz, this impact caused by the overlying soft tissue should not be high. In the future, further studies will be conducted through both numerical simulations and experiments to investigate the impact from the overlying soft tissue such as thickness and skin color. Third, the performance and limitations of the PA technique should be further evaluated via clinical studies on larger numbers of populations. In this initial study, a limited number of subjects with two extreme conditions (osteoporosis vs. healthy) were involved. In the future, additional clinical data should be collected and analyzed on a larger cohort of subjects with a broad age range so that population-based differences in PA parameters across a wide range of ages can be assessed.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This research is supported in part by NIAMS of NIH under the grant number of R43AR070071. We appreciate Professor Chengcheng Liu and Professor Dean Ta for providing the micro-CT images.

Biographies

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Ting Feng is a lecturer at the School of Electronic and Optical Engineering in Nanjing University of Science and Technology. She was the visiting scholar at the University of Michigan in 2018 and 2019. Before working as an independent investigator, Ting Feng received her Graduate degree, Master's degree and Ph. D. degree from Nanjing University in 2010, 2012 and 2016, respectively. She was the joint-PhD student at the University of Michigan in 2013–2015. Her current research interest includes photoacoustic imaging and its clinical application. A major part of her research is focused on unmixing of multi-wavelength photoacoustic measurements in scattering tissue and clinical application of photoacoustic techniques for bone assessment. Her research has led to over 20+ peer-reviewed publications.

graphic file with name fx2.jpg

Yunhao Zhu received the B.S. degree in electronic science and engineering from Nanjing University, China in 2015 and became a Ph.D. candidate at Nanjing University, China, till now. From 2016–2020, he was a visiting scholar at Optical Imaging Lab, University of Michigan—Ann Arbor, USA. His research included the studies of Crohn’s disease detection with photoacoustic imaging, LED-based photoacoustic imaging and potential clinical applications, full-wave inversion 3D speed of sound image reconstruction, and brain imaging using photoacoustic computed tomography, bone assessment through photoacoustic and ultrasound techniques. During his Ph.D. period, he has published several papers on peer-review journals as the first author, including Gastroenterology, Scientific Reports, Biomedical optics express, Sensors, etc. and a book chapter.

graphic file with name fx3.jpg

Richard Morris received his B.S.E.E. degree from Rose Hulman Institute of Technology in 1980. Recent work has been with GE Medical Systems as lead scientist for Quantitative Ultrasound and president of bb7, a product development firm in Madison Wisconsin. Currently he leads IF, LLC which is performing ultrasound research related to bone density measurements.

graphic file with name fx4.jpg

Kenneth M. Kozloff received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Michigan. He completed post-doctoral training at the Center for Molecular Imaging Research at Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, and within the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Boston Children's Hospital. He is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Michigan, which he joined in 2007. His research interests include bone fragility, metabolism, fracture and repair, and his laboratory uses pre-clinical and translational molecular imaging tools to monitor bone turnover, drug delivery, and fragility indices in the skeleton.

graphic file with name fx5.jpg

Xueding Wang is a Professor at the Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, holding an adjunct Professor position at the Department of Radiology. Before working as an independent principle investigator, Dr. Wang received his Ph.D. from the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University, and then finished postdoctoral training at the University of Michigan School of Medicine. Dr. Wang has extensive experience in imaging system development and adaptation of novel diagnostic technology to laboratory research and clinical managements, especially those involving light and ultrasound. Sponsored by NIH, NSF, DoD and other funding agencies, his research has led to over 120+ peer-reviewed publications. At the University of Michigan Medical School, a major part of his research is focused on clinical applications of photoacoustic imaging, including those involving arthritis, prostate cancer, liver conditions, breast cancer, Crohn’s disease, and eye diseases. Dr. Wang is the recipient of the Sontag Foundation Fellow of the Arthritis National Research Foundation in 2005, and the Distinguished Investigator Award of the Academy of Radiology Research in 2013. He is also sitting on the editorial boards of scientific journals including Photoacoustics, Journal of Biomedical Optics, Medical Physics, and Ultrasonic Imaging, and being the steering committee member of the Journal of Lightwave Technology.

Contributor Information

Kenneth M. kozloff, Email: kenkoz@umich.edu.

Xueding Wang, Email: xdwang@umich.edu.

References

  • 1.Rachner T.D., Khosla S., Hofbauer L.C. Osteoporosis: now and the future. Lancet. 2011;377:1276–1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62349-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barkmann R. Femur ultrasound (FemUS)—first clinical results on hip fracture discrimination and estimation of femoral BMD. Osteoporos. Int. 2010;21:969–976. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1037-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chaffaı S. Ultrasonic characterization of human cancellous bone using transmission and backscatter measurements: relationships to density and microstructure. Bone. 2002;30:229–237. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00650-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hakulinen M.A., Day J.S., Töyräs J., Weinans H., Jurvelin J.S. Ultrasonic characterization of human trabecular bone microstructure. Phys. Med. Biol. 2006;51:1633. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/6/019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hoffmeister B.K., Wilson A.R., Gilbert M.J., Sellers M.E.A. Backscatter difference technique for ultrasonic bone assessment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012;132:4069–4076. doi: 10.1121/1.4763992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Karjalainen J. Multi-site bone ultrasound measurements in elderly women with and without previous hip fractures. Osteoporos. Int. 2012;23:1287–1295. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1682-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li Y. Ultrasonic backscatter measurements at the calcaneus: an in vivo study. Measurement. 2018;122:128–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu C. Signal of interest selection standard for ultrasonic backscatter in cancellous bone evaluation. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2015;41:2714–2721. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu C. Relationships of ultrasonic backscatter with bone densities and microstructure in bovine cancellous bone. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2018;65:2311–2321. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2872084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barou O. High-resolution three-dimensional micro-computed tomography detects bone loss and changes in trabecular architecture early: comparison with DEXA and bone histomorphometry in a rat model of disuse osteoporosis. Invest. Radiol. 2002;37:40–46. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200201000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pouilles J.M., Tremollieres F., Todorovsky N., Ribot C. Precision and sensitivity of dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1991;6:997–1002. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650060914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kanis J.A., Melton L.J., III, Christiansen C., Johnston C.C., Khaltaev N. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1994;9:1137–1141. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kanis J.A.D. Iagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet. 2002;359:1929–1936. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08761-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Raum K. Bone microstructure and elastic tissue properties are reflected in QUS axial transmission measurements. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2005;31:1225–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Laugier P. Springer; 2011. Bone Quantitative Ultrasound 47-71. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Töyräs J., Nieminen M., Kröger H., Jurvelin J. Bone mineral density, ultrasound velocity, and broadband attenuation predict mechanical properties of trabecular bone differently. Bone. 2002;31:503–507. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00843-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu C. The relationship between ultrasonic backscatter and trabecular anisotropic microstructure in cancellous bone. J. Appl. Phys. 2014;115 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Njeh C., Boivin C., Langton C. The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review. Osteoporos. Int. 1997;7:7–22. doi: 10.1007/BF01623454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oei L., Koromani F., Rivadeneira F., Zillikens M.C., Oei E.H.Q. Uantitative imaging methods in osteoporosis. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2016;6:680–698. doi: 10.21037/qims.2016.12.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Griffith J.F. Vertebral marrow fat content and diffusion and perfusion indexes in women with varying bone density: MR evaluation. Radiology. 2006;241:831–838. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2413051858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Griffith J.F. Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2005;236:945–951. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2363041425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Patsch J.M. Bone marrow fat composition as a novel imaging biomarker in postmenopausal women with prevalent fragility fractures. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013;28:1721–1728. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rharass T., Lucas S. Mechanisms in endocrinology: bone marrow adiposity and bone, a bad romance? Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2018;179:R165–R182. doi: 10.1530/EJE-18-0182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang X. Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional in vivo imaging of the brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003;21:803. doi: 10.1038/nbt839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xu M., Wang L.V. Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2006;77 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Upputuri P.K., Pramanik M. Recent advances toward preclinical and clinical translation of photoacoustic tomography: a review. J. Biomed. Opt. 2016;22 doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.4.041006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhu Y. Light emitting diodes based photoacoustic imaging and potential clinical applications. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:9885. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28131-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang W. Dual-modality X-ray-Induced radiation acoustic and ultrasound imaging for real-time monitoring of radiotherapy. BME Frontiers. 2020;2020 doi: 10.34133/2020/9853609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tian C. Impact of system factors on the performance of photoacoustic tomography scanners. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2020;13 [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Steinberg I., Huland D.M., Vermesh O., Frostig H.E., Gambhir S.S. Photoacoustic clinical imaging. Photoacoustics. 2019;14:77–98. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang L.V., Hu S. Photoacoustic Tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science. 2012;335:1458–1462. doi: 10.1126/science.1216210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lashkari B., Yang L., Mandelis A. The application of backscattered ultrasound and photoacoustic signals for assessment of bone collagen and mineral contents. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2015;5:46–56. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2014.11.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lashkari B., Mandelis A. Coregistered photoacoustic and ultrasonic signatures of early bone density variations. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19 doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.3.036015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Steinberg I., Eyal A., Gannot I. In: Kollias N., editor. Vol. 8565. 2013. (Photonic Therapeutics and Diagnostics Ix). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Steinberg I., Gannot I., Eyal A. In: Oraevsky A.A., Wang L.V., editors. Vol. 9323. 2015. (Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wood C., Harutyunyan K., Sampaio D.R., Konopleva M., Bouchard R. Photoacoustic-based oxygen saturation assessment of murine femoral bone marrow in a preclinical model of leukemia. Photoacoustics. 2019;14:31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Feng T. Bone assessment via thermal photo-acoustic measurements. Opt. Lett. 2015;40:1721–1724. doi: 10.1364/OL.40.001721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Feng T. Characterization of bone microstructure using photoacoustic spectrum analysis. Opt. Express. 2015;23:25217–25224. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.025217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Steinberg I., Shiloh L., Gannot I., Eyal A. First-in-human study of bone pathologies using low-cost and compact dual-wavelength photoacoustic system. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2018;25:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kim M.W., Jeng G.S., O’Donnell M., Pelivanov I. Correction of wavelength-dependent laser fluence in swept-beam spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging with a hand-held probe. Photoacoustics. 2020;19 doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xu G., Fowlkes J.B., Tao C., Liu X., Wang X. Photoacoustic spectrum analysis for microstructure characterization in biological tissue: analytical model. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2015;41:1473–1480. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xu G. The functional pitch of an organ: quantification of tissue texture with photoacoustic spectrum analysis. Radiology. 2014;271:248–254. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rupprecht M. Bone microarchitecture of the calcaneus and its changes in aging: a histomorphometric analysis of 60 human specimens. J. Orthop. Res. 2006;24:664–674. doi: 10.1002/jor.20099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jermyn M. Fast segmentation and high-quality three-dimensional volume mesh creation from medical images for diffuse optical tomography. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013;18 doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.8.086007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dehghani H. Near infrared optical tomography using NIRFAST: algorithm for numerical model and image reconstruction. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 2009;25:711–732. doi: 10.1002/cnm.1162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pifferi A. Optical biopsy of bone tissue: a step toward the diagnosis of bone pathologies. J. Biomed. Opt. 2004;9:474–481. doi: 10.1117/1.1691029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jacques S.L. Optical properties of biological tissues: a review. Phys. Med. Biol. 2013;58:R37. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/11/R37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Treeby B.E., Jaros J., Rohrbach D., Cox B. 2014. 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium; pp. 146–149. IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wear K.A. Mechanisms of interaction of ultrasound with cancellous bone: a review. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2020;67:454–482. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2947755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wu J., Cubberley F. Measurement of velocity and attenuation of shear waves in bovine compact bone using ultrasonic spectroscopy. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1997;23:129–134. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(96)00184-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bossy E., Talmant M., Laugier P. Three-dimensional simulations of ultrasonic axial transmission velocity measurement on cortical bone models. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004;115:2314–2324. doi: 10.1121/1.1689960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tasinkevych Y., Falinska K., Lewin P.A., Litniewski J. Improving broadband ultrasound attenuation assessment in cancellous bone by mitigating the influence of cortical bone: phantom and in-vitro study. Ultrasonics. 2019;94:382–390. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rupprecht M. Bone microarchitecture of the calcaneus and its changes in aging: a histomorphometric analysis of 60 human specimens. J. Orthop. Res. 2006;24:664–674. doi: 10.1002/jor.20099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Feng T., Zhu Y., Wang X. Functional photoacoustic and ultrasonic assessment of osteoporosis--a clinical feasibility study. BME Frontiers. 2020 doi: 10.34133/2020/1081540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Feng T. Bone chemical composition assessment with multi-wavelength photoacoustic analysis. Appl. Sci.-Basel. 2020;10 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Photoacoustics are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES