Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2021 Oct 1;15(10):16819–16827. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c07192

Role of Two-Dimensional Ising Superconductivity in the Nonequilibrium Quasiparticle Spin-to-Charge Conversion Efficiency

Kun-Rok Jeon 1,*, Kyungjune Cho 1, Anirban Chakraborty 1, Jae-Chun Jeon 1, Jiho Yoon 1, Hyeon Han 1, Jae-Keun Kim 1, Stuart S P Parkin 1,*
PMCID: PMC8552497  PMID: 34597020

Abstract

graphic file with name nn1c07192_0005.jpg

Nonequilibrium studies of two-dimensional (2D) superconductors (SCs) with Ising spin–orbit coupling are prerequisite for their successful application to equilibrium spin-triplet Cooper pairs and, potentially, Majorana Fermions. By taking advantage of the recent discoveries of 2D SCs and their compatibility with any other materials, we fabricate here nonlocal magnon devices to examine how such 2D Ising superconductivity affects the conversion efficiency of magnon spin to quasiparticle charge in superconducting flakes of 2H-NbSe2 transferred onto ferrimagnetic insulating Y3Fe5O12. Comparison with a reference device based on a conventionally paired superconductor shows that the Y3Fe5O12-induced in-plane (IP) exchange spin-splitting in the NbSe2 flake is hindered by its inherent out-of-plane (OOP) spin–orbit field, which, in turn, limits the transition-state enhancement of the spin-to-charge conversion efficiency. Our out-of-equilibrium study highlights the significance of symmetry matching between underlying Cooper pairs and exchange-induced spin-splitting for the giant transition-state spin-to-charge conversion and may have implications toward proximity-engineered spin-polarized triplet pairing via tuning the relative strength of IP exchange and OOP spin–orbit fields in ferromagnetic insulator/2D Ising SC bilayers.

Keywords: 2D superconductor, Ising Cooper pairing, nonequilibrium quasiparticle spin-to-charge conversion, magnon spin transport, IP exchange spin-splitting versus OOP spin−orbit fields


Injection and excitation of electrons, typically called Bogoliubov quasiparticles (QPs), in a superconductor (SC) with either an external (Zeeman) or internal (exchange) spin-splitting field13 under nonequilibrium conditions (i.e., voltage bias or temperature gradient) have been one of the central research topics in superconducting spintronics.17 This is because their exotic transport properties, derived from the superconductivity-facilitated coupling between different nonequilibrium imbalances (e.g., spin, charge, heat, and spin-heat), can considerably improve the functionality and performance of spintronic devices. Various nonequilibrium phenomena mediated by QPs have been observed in SC-based devices with either Zeeman or exchange spin-splitting: long-range spin signals,810 pure thermal spin currents,11 large (spin-dependent) thermoelectric currents,12 and spectroscopic evidence of spin-heat transport.13

Recently, a magnon spin-transport experiment14 has reported that the conversion efficiency of thermal-magnon spin to QP charge via an inverse spin-Hall effect (iSHE)15 in an exchange-spin-split Nb layer can be significantly enhanced by up to 3 orders of magnitude in the normal-to-superconducting transition regime. This giant transition-state QP iSHE has been semi-quantitatively explained in terms of two competing mechanisms of the superconducting coherence versus the exchange-field-frozen QP relaxation. A very recent theory16 has pointed out that the electron–hole symmetry breaking present in SC/FMI (FMI = ferromagnetic insulator) bilayers mixes the spin and heat imbalances and can cause the enhancement of QP spin accumulation by several orders of magnitude relative to the normal state. Both these studies14,15 emphasize the crucial role of the spin-splitting of QP density-of-states (DOS) and the resulting electron–hole asymmetry in enhancing the spin sensitivity of the SC detector.5,15

The advent of two-dimensional (2D) SCs1721 and their compatibility with any other materials via circumventing the need for lattice matching between adjacent material systems provide platforms to explore intriguing physical phenomena in various geometries,22 including van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures with a twist, and in proximity combination with magnetic vdW flakes and/or thin films.23,24 Because excited QPs and Cooper pairs in the superconducting condensate state are intimately correlated,16 studies of nonequilibrium QP spin properties in such 2D SCs are of fundamental importance for understanding equilibrium spin-polarized triplet Cooper pairing16 and the possible stabilization of Majorana Fermions.2527

2D superconductivity has been recently discovered in monolayer transition metal dicalcogenides (TMDs)17 such as gated 2H-MoS218,19 and 2H-NbSe2.20 Interestingly, the in-plane (IP) upper critical field Inline graphic is found to far exceed the Pauli paramagnetic limit of isotropic Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) SCs Inline graphic ≈ 1.84Tc,28 where Zeeman spin-splitting fields are the predominant mechanism for Cooper pair breaking in the 2D limit and Tc is the superconducting transition temperature. Such an enhancement of Inline graphic is explained by Ising spin–orbit coupling (SOC),1721 rooted in the broken IP crystal inversion symmetry plus the large SOC due to heavy transition metal atoms in TMDs. The Ising SO field μ0HSO (as large as several hundred Tesla in the monolayer limit)1721 strongly pins Cooper pair spins at K and K’ points of the hexagonal Brillouin zone to opposite out-of-plane (OOP) directions over IP applied magnetic fields. This stabilizes OOP Cooper pairing and forms so-called Ising superconductivity.1721

We here investigate how the 2D Ising superconductivity influences the transition-state enhancement of magnon spin to QP charge conversion in a superconducting flake of 2H-NbSe220,2931 (Figure 1a) and compare its efficiency with a conventional superconducting thin film of Nb14 (BCS SC). We first demonstrate that the normal-state spin-to-charge conversion functionality of the 2H-NbSe2 flake can be 4 times more efficient than that of the Nb film. We then find distinctively different transition-state conversion behaviors (e.g., modest transition-state enhancement, rather weak thickness dependence) in the 2H-NbSe2 and attribute these to OOP Cooper pairing that hampers proximity penetration of IP exchange spin-splitting from the adjacent ferrimagnetic insulating Y3Fe5O12. Notably, the maximum enhancement of spin-to-charge conversion appears at a critical thickness over which the IP crystal symmetry is recovered (equivalently, OOP Ising pairing is no longer protected), allowing the IP exchange field to penetrate. This provides a guideline as to how to tune the relative strength of these two phenomena for a desired proximity effect.32,33 We believe that, along with recent advances in 2D SCs of various intriguing properties (e.g., type-I/-II Ising, Rashba, topological SCs),22,34 our approach helps find right material combinations for developing superconducting spintronic devices over conventional BCS SCs.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Nonlocal magnon spin-transport device with Ising superconductor. (a) Device layout and measurement scheme. When a dc charge current Idc is applied to the right Pt injector, either electrically or thermally driven magnons accumulate in the ferrimagnetic insulator Y3Fe5O12 (YIG) underneath and diffuse toward the left Pt detector. These magnon (s = +1) currents are then absorbed by the left Pt detector, resulting in the electron spin accumulation that is, in turn, converted to a nonlocal charge voltage Inline graphic via the inverse spin-Hall effect (iSHE). Such a conversion process also occurs for the central 2H-NbSe2 flake and thereby Inline graphic. Note that, unlike spin-singlet (S = 0) Cooper pairs in a coherent ground state, the excited quasiparticles (QPs) can carry spin angular momentum in the superconducting state. How out-of-plane (OOP) Cooper pairing of the 2H-NbSe2 affects the transition-state enhancement of QP iSHE will be discussed in this study. (b) Crystal structure of the 2H-NbSe2, where in-plane inversion symmetry breaking by Se plus spin–orbit coupling of Nb lead to OOP spin-singlet (S = 0) Cooper pairs, constituting Ising superconductivity. (c,e,g,i) Optical micrographs of the fabricated devices. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) scans of the transferred 2H-NbSe2 flakes (d,f,h) and the deposited Nb thin film (j).

Results and Discussion

Our nonlocal magnon spin-transport devices (Figure 1a) are composed of two identical Pt electrodes and a central 2-H NbSe2 flake transferred onto 200 nm thick single-crystalline Y3Fe5O12 (YIG) films (see Methods and Supplementary section 1 for details), which are grown by liquid phase epitaxy on a (111)-oriented single-crystalline Gd3Ga5O12, (GGG) wafer. Bulk 2H-NbSe2 is a layered type-II SC, having anisotropy29 in both the IP (OOP) coherence length Inline graphic(Inline graphic) ≈ 10 (3) nm and the IP (OOP) London penetration depth Inline graphic (Inline graphic) ≈ 70 (230) nm at zero temperature T = 0. As shown in Figure 1b, it has a hexagonal crystal structure with lattice constants, a = b ≈ 0.3 nm and c ≈ 1.3 nm and each unit cell consists of two AB stacked NbSe2 layers.30,31 On a single-piece YIG film, we prepared several independent devices with different 2H-NbSe2 flake thicknesses Inline graphic (Figure 1c–h) as well as reference devices in which Nb thin film is directly deposited14 (Figure 1i,j). The Nb thickness tNb is fixed at 15 nm, which is comparable to its dirty-limit coherence length ξNb, so that the YIG-induced exchange spin-splitting-field can penetrate the Nb layer while retaining the superconducting coherence, thereby maximizing the transition-state QP iSHE.14

In this device structure (Figure 1c,e,g,i), we pass a dc current Idc through one Pt electrode (using leads 1 and 2) while measuring the IP magnetic-field-angle α dependence of the nonlocal open-circuit voltages [Inline graphic, Inline graphic] using the other Pt electrode (leads 7 and 8) and the central NbSe2 (or Nb) (leads 3 and 4). Since we apply an external IP magnetic field μ0Hext = 5 mT that is larger than the coercive field Inline graphic of YIG, α is simply defined as the relative angle of μ0Hext (//MYIG) to the long axis of the two Pt electrodes which are collinear.14 The total voltage measured across the detector is then given by Inline graphic. Here, Inline graphic and Inline graphic developed via iSHE (spin-to-charge conversion)15 in the detector are proportional to the magnon spin current and accumulation created electrically [SHE (charge-to-spin conversion)15Idc] and thermally [spin-Seebeck effect (SSE, heat-to-spin conversion)35 ∝(Idc)2], respectively.14,35 By inverting the polarity of Idc, one can determine the magnitude of each component based on their characteristic angular dependences:14,36

graphic file with name nn1c07192_m015.jpg

and

graphic file with name nn1c07192_m016.jpg

where V0 is a spin-independent offset voltage. Below, our discussion will focus on Inline graphic, since it remains detectably large at low T for reasonable |Idc| such that Joule heating does not destroy the superconducting phase of the 2H-NbSe flake (or Nb thin film).

Let us first discuss the electrical transport properties of the transferred 2H-NbSe2 flake. In the plot of its resistance Inline graphic versus temperature T (Figure 2a) for Inline graphic = 9 nm, a resistance anomaly appears around 26 K, which is indicative of its phase transition from a normal metal to an incommensurate charge density wave (CDW) phase.37 Note that the strongly suppressed CDW phase transition temperature, TCDW = 26 K for our Inline graphic = 9 nm flake, is presumably due to the proximity coupling of the CDW with the magnetic order of YIG. In analogy with the Pauli effect28 in conventional SCs, the Zeeman (or exchange) energy competes with the CDW condensation energy and hence TCDW is predicted to decrease in the presence of external (and/or internal) spin-splitting fields.38 As T is reduced further, 2H-NbSe2 becomes superconducting below ∼6.75 K. From the T-dependent upper critical field (Figure 2d), that is obtained by applying an external magnetic field either parallel μ0H (Figure 2b) or perpendicular μ0H (Figure 2c) to the interface plane, we find Inline graphic≈ 8 nm and Inline graphic ≈ 3 nm using Ginzburg–Landau (GL) theory39 (see Methods for a detailed discussion), so confirming the anisotropic superconducting state of 2H-NbSe2.29 The extrapolated value of Inline graphic at lower T goes beyond Inline graphic = 12.4 T. Because the Inline graphic = 9 nm flake corresponds to 7× the unit cell and is much smaller than Inline graphic ≈ 230 nm, neither the IP crystal inversion symmetry nor orbital effect (i.e., interlayer Meissner screening current) is fully recovered.17 So Ising Cooper pairing1721 would account for the increase of Inline graphic over Inline graphic. Note that a rather linear Inline graphic behavior for the intermediate Inline graphic = 9 nm suggests that not only Ising SOC20 but also Abrikosov vortex occupation39 causes Cooper pair breaking (see Methods for details). These multiple characteristics are a measure of the high quality of our transferred 2H-NbSe2 flake. In contrast, the deposited Nb thin film of tNb = 15 nm has isotropic coherence lengths Inline graphicInline graphic ≈ 12–13 nm (Figure 2h) and its low-TInline graphic value is below Inline graphic= 8.3 T (Figure 2f–h), as would be expected from an isotropic BCS SC.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Electrical characterization of the transferred 2H-NbSe2 flake. (a) 2H-NbSe2 resistance Inline graphic as a function of temperature, T, for the transferred 2H-NbSe2 flake (Inline graphic 9 nm) measured using a 4-terminal current–voltage method (using leads 3–6 in Figure 1e). Typical Inline graphicT curves measured by applying an external magnetic field either parallel μ0H (b) or perpendicular μ0H (c) to the interface plane. The T-dependent IP (OOP) upper critical field Inline graphic (Inline graphic) is determined from the point where R = 0.5RT=8K. (d) Summary of the Inline graphic and Inline graphic data. The blue dashed line represents the Pauli paramagnetic limit Inline graphic ≈ 1.84Tc.28 The red and violet solid lines in (b) are theoretical fits using Ginzburg–Landau (GL)39 and pair breaking (PB)20 theories, respectively. (e–h) Data equivalent to (a)–(d) but for the tNb = 15 nm reference device (Figure 1j).

We now focus on how the conversion efficiency of magnon-carried spin to QP charge varies when the 2H-NbSe2 becomes superconducting. Figure 3a,d,g shows the thermally driven nonlocal signal Inline graphic for the Inline graphic = 4, 9, and 46 nm devices at various base temperatures Tbase around the superconducting transition Tc. In the normal state (Tbase/Tc > 1), a negative Inline graphic (<0) of a few tens of nanovolts is observed for Idc = |0.5| mA (Jdc = |3.0| MA/cm2). Given Inline graphic > 0 (Supplementary section 2) and Inline graphic < 0 (Figure 3j), this indicates that the 4d heavy element Nb, having a negative spin-Hall angle θSH (<0), governs spin-to-charge conversion characteristics in the normal-state 2H-NbSe2. Upon entering the superconducting state (Tbase/Tc < 1), a clear enhancement of Inline graphic up to around 100 nV appears immediately below Tc (Tbase/Tc ≈ 0.99) and then it decays toward zero, deep into the superconducting state. It is noteworthy that, for the normal state (Tbase > Tc), Inline graphic of the transferred 2H-NbSe2 flakes go beyond Inline graphic of the deposited Nb film, in particular, the Inline graphic = 2.5 nm device reveals 4 times greater signals (Supplementary section 3), indicating high spin mixing conductance and spin transparency at the interface between our transferred 2H-NbSe2 flakes and YIG film.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Enhancement of nonlocal signals in the transition state of the 2H-NbSe2 detector. (a,d,g) Thermally driven nonlocal voltages Inline graphic as a function of IP field angle α for the Inline graphic 4, 9, and 46 nm devices, taken at Idc = |0.5| mA around the superconducting transition, Tc, of the 2H-NbSe2. The black solid lines are sin(α) fits. Note that dips in Inline graphic at α ≈ 90° and 270° near Tc which are pronounced for a thicker flake arise from Abrikosov-vortex-flow-driven spin-independent Hall effect14 under a transverse magnetic field that is close to the upper critical field μ0Hc2 of type-II SC (i.e., vortex melting field). (b,e,h) Normalized 2H-NbSe2 resistance Inline graphicversus Tbase plots for the Inline graphic 4, 9, and 46 nm devices, measured using a four-terminal current–voltage method (using leads 3–6 in Figure 1c,e,g) with varying Idc in the Pt injector. The critical temperature Tc is defined as the point where Inline graphic. The inset summarizes the measured Tc as a function of Idc (or Jdc). (c,f,i) Estimated magnitude of Inline graphic as a function of Tbase for the Inline graphic4, 9, and 46 nm devices. (j–l) Data equivalent to (a)–(c) but for the tNb = 15 nm reference device.

We systematically measure the Tbase dependence of the normalized Inline graphic (Figure 3b,e,h) and Inline graphic(Figure 3c,f,i) with varying Idc in the Pt injector. The results are qualitatively similar to the magnon devices with Nb detectors14 and also to the tNb = 15 nm reference device studied here (Figure 3j–l). As Idc increases, Tc of the 2H-NbSe2 detector is progressively reduced (inset of Figure 3c,f,i) and the transition width broadens. As a result of this depressed superconductivity, caused by the combined effect of more populated spin-polarized QPs5 and increased heat dissipation in the 2H-NbSe2 at a high Idc, a peak of the Inline graphic enhancement occurring in the vicinity of Tc (Figure 3c,f,i) shifts to a low Tbase and the enhancement regime widens. These demonstrate that the spin-to-charge conversion efficiency indeed rises when mediated by QPs in the transition state of 2H-NbSe2/YIG bilayer, that is the enhanced spin-detection functionality of a 2D Ising SC in the normal-to-superconducting transition regime.

We next plot the normalized voltages Inline graphic (Figure 4a–c) and Inline graphic (Figure 4d) as a function of the normalized temperature Tbase/Tc for a quantitative analysis. With increasing Idc, the peak amplitude strongly diminishes, the full-width-at-half-maximum (fwhm) broadens, and the peak position is away from Tc (inset of Figure 4a–d). In addition to these generic features, one can find important quantitative differences between the 2H-NbSe2 and Nb detectors14 from the thickness dependence of the amplitude, fwhm and position (Figure 4f).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

2H-NbSe2 thickness dependence of the transition-state enhancement and comparison with the Nb detector. (a–c) Inline graphicversus Tbase/Tc plot for the Inline graphic4, 9, and 46 nm devices. Each inset displays the |Idc| (or |Jdc|) dependence of the peak amplitude, width, and position. (d) Data equivalent to (a) but for the tNb = 15 nm device. Note that unlike the amplitude, the width and position can be approximately estimated based on data below Tc (Figure 3c,f,i,l) where the transition-state enhancement of QP iSHE provides a detectable amplitude of Inline graphic. (e) Inline graphic-dependent Tc. (f) Inline graphic-dependent peak amplitude, width, and position. Abrupt changes of Tc, peak width and position below Inline graphic= 3 nm, coinciding with the OOP coherence length Inline graphic (black vertical line in e and f), are likely due to thermal-fluctuation-enhanced Tc suppression at the 2D limit.20,39 Detailed results of the Inline graphic nm device can be found in Supplementary section 3. In (e) and (f), data from the tNb = 15 nm reference device are also included for quantitative comparison.

First, the enhancement amplitude attained in the 2H-NbSe2 detectors is relatively small Inline graphic compared with the tNb = 15 nm reference device with a similar lateral dimension, even though the 2H-NbSe2 flakes (e.g., Inline graphic = 4, 9 nm) possess a higher Tc in thinner layers (Figure 4e). Second, the peak width and position abruptly change across 3 nm, coinciding with Inline graphic (black vertical line in Figure 4e,f) below which thermal-fluctuation-enhanced Tc suppression at the 2D limit is expected,20,39 and they become almost Inline graphic-independent for thicker flakes. Note that the Nb dectectors14 reveal a monotonic narrowing of fwhm and a peak shift closer to Tc with increasing tNb. Third, unlike the Nb detectors,14 the maximum enhancement in the spin-to-charge conversion does not appear at Inline graphicInline graphic and the Inline graphic-dependent enhancement is rather weak.

To account for these distinctively different conversion phenomena, we consider the layer thickness-dependent Ising superconductivity.20,40 For a few monolayer 2H-NbSe2, the IP crystal inversion symmetry is strongly broken by Se atoms (Figure 1b) and thus OOP Cooper pairing is protected and stabilized by the resulting Ising SO-field (76 meV in the monolayer limit).20,41 In this regime, the YIG-induced IP exchange field (<1 meV)14,41 hardly spin-splits the QP DOS of the 2H-NbSe2 and the transition-state enhancement of QP iSHE thus relies mostly on the superconducting-coherence-relevant resonant absorption,14,16,42 leading to a modest enhancement. As the flake becomes thicker, the IP bulk crystal inversion symmetry is restored, which weakens the OOP Ising pairing and, in turn, enables the YIG-induced IP exchange field to propagate through. This explains why we obtain the maximum enhancement of the transition-state QP iSHE at Inline graphic = 9 nm Inline graphic. Note that, as a critical thickness value that is necessary to fully restore the IP bulk inversion symmetry (equivalently, to diminish Ising pairing) is larger than the coherence length, beyond this critical value, proximity extension of the YIG-induced IP exchange spin-splitting over the entire 2H-NbSe2 layers is not very effective, limiting the enhancement amplitude. Furthermore, a Γ-centered Se-electron Fermi pocket, constituting a second band with a smaller superconducting gap, emerges in the 2H-NbSe2 thicker than a few monolayers.43 This second band whose gap energy seems weakly dependent on Inline graphic(43) can provide another path for spin-polarized QPs to enter the 2H-NbSe detector, effectively weakening the Inline graphic-dependent transition-state enhancement.

Our out-of-equilibrium study highlights the importance of symmetry matching between underlying Cooper pairs and exchange-induced spin-splitting for the giant transition-state enhancement of QP iSHE.14,16 Based on this, we would predict a greater transition-state QP iSHE, for instance, in MnPS3/NbSe2 bilayers, where exchange spin-splitting44 and SO fields are both OOP and thus match in the symmetry each other. Similarly, Rashba SC/YIG bilayers, where the Rashba SC has IP SO-fields,34 would be another symmetry-matching combination. Our results may also provide a guideline for the proximity engineering of hybrid quantum materials that allow for exotic quantum phases (e.g., topological superconductivity with spin-polarized triplet pairs and/or Majorana zero modes)2527 at zero field in equilibrium.

Conclusions

Our magnon spin-transport experiments with 2H-NbSe2 detectors have shown that OOP Cooper pairing of Ising SC, derived by IP inversion symmetry breaking and strong SOC, hinders the proximity propagation of IP exchange spin-splitting, in turn limiting the transition-state enhancement of QP iSHE. Contrary to the magnon devices with Nb (BCS SC) detectors,14 the maximum enhancement does not appear at Inline graphicInline graphic but at a different critical thickness over which the IP crystal symmetry is recovered and so the OOP Ising pairing is no longer protected, allowing the IP exchange field to penetrate. This result should be taken into account for better proximity engineering of Ising SC triplet Josephson junctions with IP ferromagnets.45 We believe that, with the layer thickness-tunable OOP Cooper pairing20,40 and IP exchange spin-splitting, 2D Ising SC/FMI bilayers have desirable material properties for the topological protection of spin-polarized triplet Cooper pairs25 and Majorana Fermions.26,27 Our findings, together with recent progress in 2D SCs and magnetic vdW crystals,22,24 also raise the possibility of developing highly efficient atomically thin spin-to-charge converters via symmetry engineering.

Methods

Device Fabrication

We fabricated the magnon spin-transport devices (Figure 1c,e,g,i) based on 200 nm thick single-crystalline YIG films (from Matesy GmbH, https://www.matesy.de/en/products/materials/yig-single-crystal) as follows. We first defined a pair of Pt electrodes with an area of 1.5 × 50 μm2, which were deposited by dc magnetron plasma sputtering at an Ar pressure of 4 × 10–3 mbar. These Pt electrodes are separated by a center-to-center distance dPt–Pt of 15 μm, which is comparable to the magnon spin-diffusion length Inline graphic estimated from our previous study.14 For the reference device (Figure 1i), we defined the central 15 nm thick Nb detector with a lateral dimension of 9 × 12 μm2, which was grown by Ar-ion beam sputtering at a working pressure of 1.5 × 10–4 mbar. Subsequently, we defined the outer Au(80 nm)/Ru(2 nm) leads and bonding pads, which were deposited by Ar-ion beam sputtering.

We next selected NbSe2 flakes of suitable geometry and thickness, which were mechanically exfoliated from a high-quality single crystal (from HQ Graphene, http://www.hqgraphene.com/NbSe2.php) and first transferred onto SiO2(300 nm)/Si substrates, via optical microscopy inspection. We then picked up the selected NbSe2 flake and transferred it onto the central region of each magnon device (Figure 1c,e,g) using a polydimethylsiloxane-based dry transfer method (see Supplementary section 1 for full details). All these processes have been conducted in an inert atmosphere glovebox to prevent oxidation and degradation of the 2H-NbSe2. Note that the 2H-NbSe2 flakes and Nb thin film were prepared on the same-piece YIG film, confirming almost identical SHE/iSHE properties of the Pt injectors/detectors.

To prevent the unintentional contribution of iSHE from inner Au/Ru leads themselves to total voltage signals, we electrically isolate them from the active regime of magnon spin-transport by depositing a 10 nm thick Al2O3 oxide layer in-between apart from the electrical contact parts on top of the central 2H-NbSe2 (or Nb). Finally, we defined the inner Au(10 nm)/Ru(2 nm) leads, which were deposited by Ar-ion beam sputtering. Before depositing the inner Au/Ru leads, the NbSe2 (or Nb) and Pt surface were gently Ar-ion beam etched for transparent electrical contacts between them.

Superconducting Transition Measurement

To characterize superconducting properties, dc electrical transport measurements were conducted on either transferred NbSe2 flakes or deposited Nb thin films of the fabricated magnon devices attached on either IP (Figure 2b) or OOP (Figure 2c) rotatable holder in a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS). Using electrical leads 3–6 (Figure 1c,e,g,i) with a four-probe configuration, we measured the resistance Rversus temperature T curves at the applied current I ≤ 10 μA while decreasing T. The T-dependent IP (OOP) upper critical field Inline graphic (Inline graphic) of Figure 2d (Figure 2g) was obtained by applying an external magnetic field μ0H0H) parallel (perpendicular) to the interface plan. The Inline graphic and Inline graphic values are determined from the point where R = 0.5RT=8K.

We estimated the Inline graphicand Inline graphic values of the transferred 2H-NbSe2 flake (Inline graphic = 9 nm) from the Inline graphic and Inline graphic data (Figure 2d), respectively, using an anisotropic GL theory39 for Inline graphic:

graphic file with name nn1c07192_m073.jpg 1a
graphic file with name nn1c07192_m074.jpg 1b

where Inline graphic is the magnetic flux quantum. It is noteworthy that as Inline graphic is reduced and reaches the atomically thin limit (Inline graphic), the dominant Cooper-pair breaking mechanism under application of μ0H changes from Abrikosov vortex occupation to Ising SOC as recently discussed.1721 For Inline graphic, eq 1a can thus be rewritten as

graphic file with name nn1c07192_m079.jpg 1c

where Inline graphic is the strength of Ising SO field. For completeness, we also fitted the Inline graphic data (violet solid line, Figure 2d) with this formula.

On the other hand, for the deposited Nb thin film of tNb = 15 nm ≤ Inline graphic, the T-dependent upper critical fields (Figure 2h) were fitted with39

graphic file with name nn1c07192_m083.jpg 2a
graphic file with name nn1c07192_m084.jpg 2b

Note that, unlike bulk Nb, the occupation energy of Abrikosov vortices in a superconducting Nb thin film (tNbInline graphic) under μ0H is higher than that under μ0H, differentiating formulas (eq 2a and 2b) for the T-dependent IP/OOP upper critical fields.39 This is because the density of Cooper pairs cannot change much on a length scale shorter than the coherence length and hence IP Abrikosov vortices cannot efficiently accommodate magnetic flux.39 When the Nb (BCS SC) film becomes sufficiently thin (tNbInline graphic), Abrikosov vortex occupation under μ0H is strongly suppressed and a μ0H-driven dominant Cooper-pair breaker is now the Pauli paramagnetic effect (i.e., Zeeman spin-splitting).28 Accordingly, eq 2a can be rewritten by

graphic file with name nn1c07192_m087.jpg 2c

Nonlocal Measurements

We measured the nonlocal magnon spin-transport (Figure 1a) on the magnon devices attached on an IP rotatable sample holder in the Quantum Design PPMS at various T between 2 and 300 K. A dc current Idc in the range of 0.1–1 mA was applied to the first Pt using a Keithley 6221 current source, and the nonlocal voltages [Inline graphic, Inline graphic] across the second Pt and the central 2H-NbSe2 (or Nb) are simultaneously recorded as a function of IP magnetic-field-angle α with rotating the IP sample holder by a Keithley 2182A nanovoltmeter. Note that α is defined as the relative angle of μ0Hext (//MYIG) to the long axis of two Pt electrodes which are collinear.

The Oersted field μ0HOe induced from Idc applied to the Pt electrode is estimated using Ampere’s law

graphic file with name nn1c07192_m090.jpg

Here μ0 = 4π × 10–7 Tm/A is the permeability of free space, wPt is the width (1.5 μm) of the Pt electrode, and d is the distance from the Pt/YIG interface. For the maximum Idc = 1.0 mA used, we get μ0HOe = 0.3–0.4 mT at d = 100 nm and it decreases to 0.02–0.03 mT at d = 7.5 μm. These estimated values are too weak to perturb the magnetization direction of ferrimagnetic insulating YIG14 under application of μ0H = 5 mT (Figure 1c,e,g,i) and to suppress the superconducting properties of 2H-NbSe2 flakes and a Nb thin film whose upper critical fields in the transition state are larger than 0.5 T (Figure 2b,c,f,g).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.1c07192.

  • Dry transfer of 2H-NbSe2 flakes onto magnon spin-transport devices, Nonlocal spin signals detected by the Pt detector across Tc of the 2H-NbSe2 flake, Transition-state enhancement of QP iSHE for the tNbSe2 = 2.5 nm device (PDF)

Author Contributions

K.-R.J. and K.C. contributed equally to this work. K.-R.J. and S.P.P.P. conceived and designed the experiments. The magnon spin-transport devices were fabricated by K.-R.J. with help from J.Y., J.-C.J., A.C., H.H., J.-K.K., and K.C. K.-R.J. performed exfoliation/pick-up/transfer of 2H-NbSe2 under the guidance of K.C. The nonlocal transport measurements were carried out by K.-R.J. with the help of J.Y. and J.-C.J. K.-R.J. performed the data analysis. S.P.P.P. supervised the project. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript, which was written by K.-R.J., K.C., and S.S.P.P.

Open access funded by Max Planck Society.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

nn1c07192_si_001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

References

  1. Beckmann D. Spin Manipulation in Nanoscale S uperconductors. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2016, 28, 163001. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/16/163001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergeret F. S.; Silaev M.; Virtanen P.; Heikkilä T. T. Colloquium: Nonequilibrium Effects in Superconductors with a Spin-Splitting Field. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018, 90, 041001. 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.041001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Quay C. H. L.; Aprili M. Out-of-Equilibrium Spin Transport in Mesoscopic Superconductors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 2018, 376, 20150342. 10.1098/rsta.2015.0342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Linder J.; Robinson J. W. A. Superconducting Spintronics. Nat. Phys. 2015, 11, 307. 10.1038/nphys3242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang H.; Yang S.-H.; Takahashi S.; Maekawa S.; Parkin S. S. P. Extremely Long Quasiparticle Spin Lifetimes in Superconducting Aluminium Using MgO Tunnel Spin Injectors. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 586. 10.1038/nmat2781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wakamura T.; Akaike H.; Omori Y.; Niimi Y.; Takahashi S.; Fujimaki A.; Maekawa A.; Otani Y. Quasiparticle-Mediated Spin Hall Effect in a Superconductor. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14 (2015), 675. 10.1038/nmat4276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hubler F.; Lemyre J. C.; Beckmann D.; v. Löhneysen H. Charge Imbalance in Superconductors in the Low-Temperature Limit. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 81, 184524. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.184524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hübler F.; Wolf M. J.; Beckmann D.; v. Löhneysen H. Long-Range Spin-Polarized Quasiparticle Transport in Mesoscopic Al Superconductors with a Zeeman Splitting. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 207001. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.207001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Quay C. H. L.; Chevallier D.; Bena C.; Aprili M. Spin Imbalance and Spin-Charge Separation in a Mesoscopic Superconductor. Nat. Phys. 2013, 9, 84. 10.1038/nphys2518. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Silaev M.; Virtanen P.; Bergeret F. S.; Heikkilä T. T. Long-Range Spin Accumulation from Heat Injection in Mesoscopic Superconductors with Zeeman Splitting. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 167002. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.167002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Machon P.; Eschrig M.; Belzig W. Nonlocal Thermoelectric Effects and Nonlocal Onsager Relations in a Three-Terminal Proximity-Coupled Superconductor-Ferromagnet Device. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 047002. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.047002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kolenda S.; Wolf M. J.; Beckmann D. Observation of Thermoelectric Currents in High-Field Superconductor-Ferromagnet Tunnel Junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 097001. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.097001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuzmanović M.; Wu B. Y.; Weideneder M.; Quay C. H. L.; Aprili M. Evidence for Spin-Dependent Energy Transport in a Superconductor. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4336. 10.1038/s41467-020-18161-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jeon K.-R.; Jeon J.-C.; Zhou X.; Migliorini A.; Yoon J.; Parkin S. S. P. Giant Transition-State Quasiparticle Spin-Hall Effect in an Exchange-Spin-Split Superconductor Detected by Nonlocal Magnon Spin Transport. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 15874. 10.1021/acsnano.0c07187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sinova J.; Valenzuela S. O.; Wunderlich J.; Back C. H.; Jungwirth T. Spin Hall Effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015, 87, 1213. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ojajärvi R.; Heikkilä T. T.; Virtanen P.; Silaev M. A. Giant Enhancement to Spin Battery Effect in Superconductor/Ferromagnetic Insulator Systems. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2021, 103, 224524. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.224524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Xu X.; Yao W.; Xiao D.; Heinz T. F. Spin and Pseudospins in Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 2014, 10, 343. 10.1038/nphys2942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu J. M.; Zheliuk O.; Leermakers I.; Yuan N. F. Q.; Zeitler U.; Law K. T.; Ye J. T. Evidence for Two-Dimensional Ising Superconductivity in Gated MoS2. Science 2015, 350, 1353. 10.1126/science.aab2277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Saito Y.; Nakamura Y.; Bahramy M. S.; Kohama Y.; Ye J.; Kasahara Y.; Nakagawa Y.; Onga M.; Tokunaga M.; Nojima T.; Yanase Y.; Iwasa Y. Superconductivity Protected by Spin–Valley Locking in Ion-Gated MoS2. Nat. Phys. 2016, 12, 144. 10.1038/nphys3580. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Xi X.; Wang Z.; Zhao W.; Park J.-H.; Law K. T.; Berger H.; Forró L.; Shan J.; Mak K. F. Ising Pairing in Superconducting NbSe2 Atomic Layers. Nat. Phys. 2016, 12, 139. 10.1038/nphys3538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Smidman M.; Salamon M. B.; Yuan H. Q.; Agterberg D. F. Superconductivity and Spin-Orbit Coupling in Non-Centrosymmetric Materials: A Review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2017, 80, 036501. 10.1088/1361-6633/80/3/036501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Novoselov K. S.; Mishchenko A.; Carvalho A.; Castro Neto A. H. 2D Materials and van der Waals Heterostructures. Science 2016, 353, aac9439. 10.1126/science.aac9439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin X.; Yang W.; Wang K. L.; Zhao W. Two-Dimensional Spintronics for Low-Power Electronics. Nat. Electron. 2019, 2, 274. 10.1038/s41928-019-0273-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ghiasi T. S.; Kaverzin A. A.; Dismukes A. H.; de Wal D. K.; Roy X.; van Wees B. J. Electrical and Thermal Generation of Spin Currents by Magnetic Bilayer Graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16, 788. 10.1038/s41565-021-00887-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wickramaratne D.; Khmelevskyi S.; Agterberg D. F.; Mazin I. I. Ising Superconductivity and Magnetism in NbSe2. Phys. Rev. X 2020, 10, 041003. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hsu Y.-T.; Vaezi A.; Fischer M. H.; Kim E.-A. Topological Superconductivity in Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14985. 10.1038/ncomms14985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vaitiekėnas S.; Liu Y.; Krogstrup P.; Marcus C. M. Zero-Field Topological Superconductivity in Ferromagnetic Hybrid Nanowires. Nat. Phys. 2021, 17, 43. 10.1038/s41567-020-1017-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Clogston A. M. Upper Limit for the Critical Field in Hard Superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1962, 9, 266. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.9.266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. de Trey P.; Gygax S.; Jan J. P. Anisotropy of Ginzburg–Landau Parameter κ in NbSe2. J. Low Temp. Phys. 1973, 11, 421. 10.1007/BF00656561. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Marezio M.; Dernier P. D.; Menth A.; Hull G. W. Jr. The Crystal Structure of NbSe2 at 15 K. J. Solid State Chem. 1972, 4, 425. 10.1016/0022-4596(72)90158-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mattheiss L. F. Band Structures of Transition-Metal-Dichalcogenide Layer Compounds. Phys. Rev. B 1973, 8, 3719. 10.1103/PhysRevB.8.3719. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Buzdin A. I. Proximity Effects in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Heterostructures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2005, 77, 935. 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.935. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Žutić I.; Matos-Abiague A.; Scharf B.; Dery H.; Belashchenko K. Proximitized Materials. Mater. Today 2019, 22, 85. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Qiu D.; Gong C.; Wang S.; Zhang M.; Yang C.; Wang X.; Xiong J. Recent Advances in 2D Superconductors. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2006124. 10.1002/adma.202006124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ganzhorn K.; Wimmer T.; Cramer J.; Schlitz R.; Geprägs S.; Jakob G.; Gross R.; Huebl H.; Kläui M.; Goennenwein S. T. B. Temperature Dependence of the Non-Local Spin Seebeck Effect in YIG/Pt Nanostructures. AIP Adv. 2017, 7, 085102. 10.1063/1.4986848. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Cornelissen L. J.; Liu J.; Duine R. A.; Ben Youssef J.; van Wees B. J. Long-Distance Transport of Magnon Spin Information in a Magnetic Insulator at Room Temperature. Nat. Phys. 2015, 11, 1022. 10.1038/nphys3465. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Xi X.; Zhao L.; Wang Z.; Berger H.; Forró L.; Shan J.; Mak K. F. Strongly Enhanced Charge-Density-Wave Order in Monolayer NbSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 765. 10.1038/nnano.2015.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McKenzie R. H.Is the Ground State of Alpha-(BEDT-TTF)2MHg(SCN)4[M = K,Rb,Tl] a Charge-Density Wave or a Spin-Density Wave? arXiv (Strongly Correlated Electrons), March 5, 1998, ver. 2. https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9706235v2. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tinkham M.Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  40. de la Barrera S. C.; Sinko M. R.; Gopalan D. P.; Sivadas N.; Seyler K. L.; Watanabe K.; Taniguchi T.; Tsen A. W.; Xu X.; Xiao D.; Hunt B. M. Tuning Ising Superconductivity with Layer and Spin–Orbit Coupling in Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1427. 10.1038/s41467-018-03888-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wei P.; Lee S.; Lemaitre F.; Pinel L.; Cutaia D.; Cha W.; Katmis F.; Zhu Y.; Heiman D.; Hone J.; Moodera J. S.; Chen C.-T. Strong Interfacial Exchange Field in the Graphene/EuS Heterostructure. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 711. 10.1038/nmat4603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kato T.; Ohnuma Y.; Matsuo M.; Rech J.; Jonckheere T.; Martin T. Microscopic Theory of Spin Transport at the Interface between a Superconductor and a Ferromagnetic Insulator. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2019, 99, 144411. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.144411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Dvir T.; Massee F.; Attias L.; Khodas M.; Aprili M.; Quay C. H. L.; Steinberg H. Spectroscopy of Bulk and Few-Layer Superconducting NbSe2 with van der Waals Tunnel Junctions. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 598. 10.1038/s41467-018-03000-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Xing W.; Qiu L.; Wang X.; Yao Y.; Ma Y.; Cai R.; Jia S.; Xie X. C.; Han W. Magnon Transport in Quasi-Two-Dimensional van der Waals Antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. X 2019, 9, 011026. 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.011026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tang G.; Klees R. L.; Bruder C.; Belzig W.. Controlling Charge and Spin Transport in an Ising-Superconductor Josephson Junction. arXiv (Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics), July 29, 2021, ver. 1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.14259. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nn1c07192_si_001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Nano are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES