Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2021 Aug 25;9(1):10.1128/spectrum.00161-21. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00161-21

A Single Bacterium Capable of Oxidation and Reduction of Iron at Circumneutral pH

Shingo Kato a,, Moriya Ohkuma a
Editor: Jeffrey A Gralnickb
PMCID: PMC8552755  PMID: 34431720

ABSTRACT

Fe(II)-oxidizing microorganisms and Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms, which drive the biogeochemical Fe cycle on the Earth’s surface, are phylogenetically and ecologically diverse. However, no single organism capable of aerobic Fe(II) oxidation and anaerobic Fe(III) reduction at circumneutral pH have been reported so far. Here, we report a novel neutrophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing Rhodoferax bacterium, strain MIZ03, isolated from an iron-rich wetland in Japan. Our cultivation experiments demonstrate that MIZ03 represents a much more versatile metabolism for energy acquisition than previously recognized in the genus Rhodoferax. MIZ03 can grow chemolithoautotrophically at circumneutral pH by oxidation of Fe(II), H2, or thiosulfate as the sole electron donor under (micro)aerobic conditions (i.e., using O2 as the sole electron acceptor). In addition, it can reduce Fe(III) or nitrate under anaerobic conditions. Thus, this is the first report demonstrating the presence of a single bacterium capable of both Fe(II) oxidation and Fe(III) reduction at circumneutral pH. The observed physiology was consistent with its 4.9-Mbp complete genome encoding key genes for iron oxidation/reduction (foxEY and mtrABC), for nitrate reduction (narGHI), for thiosulfate oxidation (soxABCDXYZ), and for carbon fixation via the Calvin cycle. Our metagenomic survey suggests that there are more Rhodoferax members capable of Fe(II) oxidation and Fe(III) reduction. Such bifunctional Rhodoferax may have an ecological advantage in suboxic/anoxic environments at circumneutral pH by recycling of Fe as the electron donor and acceptor.

IMPORTANCE The biogeochemical cycle of iron (Fe) via reactions of oxidation, reduction, precipitation, and dissolution is involved in the cycle of other ecologically relevant elements, such as C, N, P, S, As, Co, Ni, and Pb. The Fe cycle on the Earth’s surface is driven by a variety of Fe(II)-oxidizing microorganisms and Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms. Here, we discovered a novel bacterium, Rhodoferax sp. strain MIZ03, capable of both Fe(II) oxidation and Fe(III) reduction at circumneutral pH, and we report its physiological characteristics and complete genome sequence. The unexpected capability of this bacterium provides novel insights into the Fe cycle in the environment. Moreover, this bacterium will help to better understand the molecular mechanisms of microbial Fe redox cycling as a model organism.

KEYWORDS: Rhodoferax, chemolithotrophy, iron cycling, iron oxidizers, iron reduction


The biogeochemical Fe cycle on the Earth’s surface is driven by phylogenetically and ecologically diverse Fe(II)-oxidizing microorganisms (FeOM) and Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms (FeRM) (14). Ferrous ion (Fe2+) is rapidly and abiotically oxidized and precipitated as Fe(III) oxide minerals at circumneutral pH under atmospheric conditions. However, the abiotic Fe(II) oxidation rate becomes slower under microaerobic conditions, and thus more Fe2+ is available for FeOM as the electron donor (3). Indeed, all of the known neutrophilic, O2-respirating FeOM, such as Gallionella spp., Sideroxydans spp., and Mariprofundus spp., are microaerophilic (3). The by-products from FeOM are solid Fe(III) minerals that can be reduced and redissolved to Fe2+ by FeRM, such as Geobacter spp. and Shewanella spp., as the electron acceptor under anaerobic conditions (4). The phylogenetic diversity of neutrophilic, microaerophilic FeOM is limitedly unveiled probably due to the technical difficulty of their cultivation. Accordingly, the molecular mechanisms of Fe(II) oxidation by neutrophilic FeOM are largely unclear (57). Nevertheless, a few candidate genes (e.g., cyc2 and mtoA) involved in Fe(II) oxidation have been proposed (8, 9) and found in diverse microbial genomes/metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) (7), implying that neutrophilic FeOM are more phylogenetically diverse.

The genus Rhodoferax contains metabolically versatile species capable of photosynthesis, fermentation, and aerobic and/or anaerobic respiration. So far, Rhodoferax ferrireducens has been reported as the sole Rhodoferax species that can anaerobically grow by reduction of Fe(III) as the electron acceptor coupled with oxidation of organic acids and sugars as the electron donors (10, 11). A recent report of enrichment cultivation and metagenomics suggested the presence of H2-oxidizing and Fe(III)-reducing chemolithoautotrophic Rhodoferax spp. in a subglacial environment (12). The capability of Fe(II) oxidation by Rhodoferax spp. in iron mats has been proposed by environmental analyses of geochemistry and microbial communities (13). However, no pure culture of chemolithoautotrophic Rhodoferax spp. has been reported. Such chemolithoautotrophic Rhodoferax spp. potentially play a significant role in biogeochemical cycling of carbon and iron in the dark, organic-poor, subsurface environments where the inorganic energy sources are available. Here, we report a novel Rhodoferax isolate, designated strain MIZ03 (deposited in the Japan Collection of Microorganisms under the number JCM 34246), which grows chemolithoautotrophically at circumneutral pH using Fe(II), H2, or thiosulfate as the sole electron donor under (micro)aerobic conditions.

We collected an iron-rich floc sample in a freshwater wetland (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material; 36°04′41″N, 140°05′24″E; 18°C, pH 6.5, <0.01% salinity) next Mizube Park, Tsukuba, Japan, in November 2018. Using the collected sample as the inoculum, we performed isolation of microaerophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria (FeOB) with a 96-well-plate gradient cultivation method as described previously (14). Details of experimental procedures are described in the supplemental material. We were successful in subcultivation of six positive cultures representing a typical iron-oxide band for microaerophilic FeOB cultures (15, 16). 16S rRNA gene clone analysis indicated the presence of known FeOB relatives (such as Sideroxydans and Thiomonas spp.) and a Rhodoferax relative in these cultures (Table S1). In this study, we focused on the Rhodoferax-containing culture. We subcultivated the Rhodoferax-containing culture on R2A plates and performed single-colony isolation repeatedly. Eventually, the Rhodoferax isolate, strain MIZ03, was obtained. The purity was checked using light microscopy, 16S rRNA gene analysis, and shotgun genome analysis. We confirmed that MIZ03, as well as the other FeOB strains obtained in this study, produced the iron-oxide band in the gradient culture tubes with an FeCO3 plug (Fig. S2), which resembles known microaerophilic freshwater FeOB (15, 16).

We determined the physiology and complete genome sequence of MIZ03 (Table S2). The phylogenomic tree (Fig. 1A) and the 16S rRNA gene similarity and average nucleotide identity values compared to the close relatives (Table S2) suggest that MIZ03 represents a novel species in the genus Rhodoferax. We tentatively propose the name Rhodoferax lithotrophicus for this strain. In the phylogenomic tree, MIZ03 was clustered with metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) recovered from deep subsurface groundwater environments (17, 18) but was distantly related to the two MAGs (KJH.1 and KJN.1) of the chemolithoautotrophic enrichment cultures from a subglacial environment (12) and to the genomes of any cultivates including R. ferrireducens.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Genomics and chemolithoautotrophic growth of Rhodoferax lithotrophicus MIZ03. (A) Phylogenomic tree and gene content for microaerobic chemolithoautotrophy. A maximum-likelihood tree based on the alignment of 120 bacterial marker proteins is shown. Bootstrap values (only >50%) are indicated at the nodes. Curvibacter delicatus (GenBank accession no. GCF_001592265) was used as the outgroup (not shown). On the right side of panel A, the presence or absence (filled/opened squares) of genes for FoxEY, Cyc2, and MtrABC (Fe oxidation/reduction), large and small subunits of group I hydrogenase (H2 oxidation), SoxABCDXYZ (thiosulfate oxidation), CbbM (carbon fixation), NarGHI (nitrate reduction), CooNOPQ, and CydABX (aerobic respiration under low O2 concentration) is indicated for each genome/MAG. (B) Growth curves of MIZ03 growing under the 1% O2 and air conditions. Cell densities in the cultures with H2 and air (green-filled circles) or 1% O2 (blue-filled circles), with thiosulfate and air (orange-filled diamonds) or 1% O2 (purple-filled diamonds), with Fe(II) and 1% O2 (red-filled squares), and without any electron donors with air/1% O2 (yellow-opened diamonds), are shown. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of the mean of biological triplicates. For the thiosulfate-oxidizing cultures, an increase of sulfate concentration (from an initial concentration of 0.7 mM to 9.2 ± 0.3 mM at 21 days after inoculation) by thiosulfate oxidation was confirmed. For the H2-oxidizing cultures, consumption of H2 was observed (Fig. S3). For the experiments with cells, the initial cell densities were approximately 1 × 104 cells/ml, as calculated from the cell numbers in the inoculum. All the data points under the detection limit (d.l.; 2 × 105 cells/ml) are shown on the detection limit line. (C) Metabolic pathway of MIZ03 deduced from the annotated genome. A list of CDSs is shown in Table S4.

The optimum and range of growth temperature, pH, and salinity and the energy metabolism of MIZ03 and close relatives are summarized in Table S2 (more details for MIZ03 metabolism are shown in Table S3). For all the growth experiments for substrate utilization, the strain was transferred at least three times using the specific growth mode tested. MIZ03 grew chemoorganotrophically in R2A medium (containing various organic substances such as yeast extract, peptone, and glucose) under dark and (micro)aerobic conditions (1% O2 or air in the headspace). It also grew anaerobically by fermentation in R2A medium, as reported for R. fermentans (19).

Our cultivation experiments demonstrated that MIZ03 grew chemolithoautotrophically at circumneutral pH by oxidation of Fe(II), H2, or thiosulfate as the sole electron donor under (micro)aerobic conditions (Fig. 1B; Fig. S3 and S4). In addition, MIZ03 reduced nitrate and dissolved Fe(III) [i.e., Fe(III)-NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid) and Fe(III)-citrate] or a solid Fe(III) mineral (ferrihydrite), coupled with oxidation of organic substances in R2A medium as the electron donor under anaerobic conditions but did not reduce the other solid Fe(III) minerals tested (i.e., goethite, magnetite, and hematite) (Fig. S5; Tables S2 and S3). The previous studies reported that R. ferrireducens can reduce dissolved Fe(III) but not any solid Fe(III) minerals (10, 11). Although the reduction of ferrihydrite by MIZ03 enhanced its growth rate and yield (Fig. S5), it is unclear whether the growth enhancement is caused by an energetic or nutritional effects (i.e., increase of iron availability).

The genome content was consistent with the observed metabolism (Fig. 1C; Table S4). The MIZ03 genome encoded 87 protein-coding regions (CDSs) for c-type cytochrome with one or more heme-binding motifs (Table S5), including homologs of MtrA/MtoA, MtrC/MtoC, and FoxE, which have been reported as functional proteins for Fe redox reaction in known Fe(II) oxidizers (e.g., Rhodobacter and Sideroxydans spp.) and Fe(III) reducers (e.g., Geobacter and Shewanella spp.) as reviewed in reference 7. At present, it is unclear which (or even whether) homologs are involved in iron oxidation/reduction by MIZ03. No CDSs for Cyc2, which is thought to be involved in iron oxidation by microaerophilic FeOB (6, 9), were found. For H2 and thiosulfate oxidation and nitrate reduction, the MIZ03 genome encoded CDSs for respiratory H2-uptake [NiFe] hydrogenase (group 1d), SOX system, and nitrate reductase (NarGHI), respectively. In addition, it encoded a complete set of CDSs for the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle, including ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) form II (CbbM) for autotrophy, and CDSs for aa3-, cbb3-, and bd-type terminal oxidases for (micro)aerobic respiration. No CDSs for photosynthesis were found.

Aerobic Fe(II) oxidation and anaerobic Fe(III) reduction by a single microorganism had been reported only in acidophiles (20). Some Fe(III) reducers can grow by anaerobic Fe(II) oxidation coupled with nitrate reduction (2), but not with aerobic respiration. For the first time, we demonstrate that, among all three domains of life, there is a single microorganism capable of microaerobic Fe(II) oxidation and anaerobic Fe(III) reduction at circumneutral pH. Such bifunctional microorganisms may have an ecological advantage in suboxic/anoxic environments by recycling of iron as the electron donor and acceptor. In addition to Fe(II), MIZ03 can grow chemolithoautotrophically using H2 or thiosulfate as the sole electron donor, which is consistent with its genome content. Notably, other Rhodoferax genomes/MAGs also encode the genes likely involved in the Fe(II)-, H2-, and thiosulfate-oxidizing chemolithoautotrophic growth under (micro)aerobic conditions (Fig. 1A). Indeed, the presence of such chemolithoautotrophic Rhodoferax spp. has been suggested in several environments (12, 13). Further cultivation and physiological tests may lead to discovering more diverse chemolithoautotrophic Rhodoferax spp. and to emphasizing their ecological significance. Finally, the unique Rhodoferax bacterium MIZ03 with the unexpected versatile metabolism, including Fe(II) oxidation and Fe(III) reduction, will open a new window on the ecophysiology and molecular mechanism of the Fe cycle as a model organism.

Data availability.

The raw sequence data and the complete genome sequence of MIZ03 have been deposited in the DDBJ under the accession numbers DRA011244 and AP024238, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Nahomi Noda for her technical assistance. We also thank Takao Iino and Takashi Itoh for their helpful discussion and technical support.

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers 19H05679 (Post-Koch Ecology), 19H05689, and 19H03310.

We declare no conflict of interest and no competing financial interests.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

SUPPLEMENTAL FILE 1
Supplemental material. Download SPECTRUM00161-21_Supp_1_seq4.pdf, PDF file, 2.5 MB (2.6MB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Shingo Kato, Email: skato@riken.jp.

Jeffrey A. Gralnick, University of Minnesota

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kappler A, Bryce C, Mansor M, Lueder U, Byrne JM, Swanner ED. 2021. An evolving view on biogeochemical cycling of iron. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:360–374. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00502-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Weber KA, Achenbach LA, Coates JD. 2006. Microorganisms pumping iron: anaerobic microbial iron oxidation and reduction. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:752–764. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Emerson D, Fleming EJ, McBeth JM. 2010. Iron-oxidizing bacteria: an environmental and genomic perspective. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:561–583. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lovley D. 2013. Dissimilatory Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-reducing prokaryotes, p 287–308. In Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F (ed), The prokaryotes. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Emerson D, Field EK, Chertkov O, Davenport KW, Goodwin L, Munk C, Nolan M, Woyke T. 2013. Comparative genomics of freshwater Fe-oxidizing bacteria: implications for physiology, ecology, and systematics. Front Microbiol 4:254. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kato S, Ohkuma M, Powell DH, Krepski ST, Oshima K, Hattori M, Shapiro N, Woyke T, Chan CS. 2015. Comparative genomic insights into ecophysiology of neutrophilic, microaerophilic iron oxidizing bacteria. Front Microbiol 6:1265. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garber AI, Nealson KH, Okamoto A, McAllister SM, Chan CS, Barco RA, Merino N. 2020. FeGenie: a comprehensive tool for the identification of iron genes and iron gene neighborhoods in genome and metagenome assemblies. Front Microbiol 11:37. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu J, Wang Z, Belchik SM, Edwards MJ, Liu C, Kennedy DW, Merkley ED, Lipton MS, Butt JN, Richardson DJ, Zachara JM, Fredrickson JK, Rosso KM, Shi L. 2012. Identification and characterization of MtoA: a decaheme c-type cytochrome of the neutrophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacterium Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1. Front Microbiol 3:37. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barco RA, Emerson D, Sylvan JB, Orcutt BN, Jacobson Meyers ME, Ramirez GA, Zhong JD, Edwards KJ. 2015. New insight into microbial iron oxidation as revealed by the proteomic profile of an obligate iron-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:5927–5937. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01374-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chaudhuri SK, Lovley DR. 2003. Electricity generation by direct oxidation of glucose in mediatorless microbial fuel cells. Nat Biotechnol 21:1229–1232. doi: 10.1038/nbt867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Finneran KT, Johnsen CV, Lovley DR. 2003. Rhodoferax ferrireducens sp. nov., a psychrotolerant, facultatively anaerobic bacterium that oxidizes acetate with the reduction of Fe(III). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:669–673. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02298-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dunham EC, Dore JE, Skidmore ML, Roden EE, Boyd ES. 2021. Lithogenic hydrogen supports microbial primary production in subglacial and proglacial environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2007051117. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007051117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Emerson D, Scott JJ, Benes J, Bowden WB. 2015. Microbial iron oxidation in the Arctic tundra and its implications for biogeochemical cycling. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:8066–8075. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02832-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kato S, Chan C, Itoh T, Ohkuma M. 2013. Functional gene analysis of freshwater iron-rich flocs at circumneutral pH and isolation of a stalk-forming microaerophilic iron-oxidizing bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5283–5290. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03840-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Emerson D, Moyer C. 1997. Isolation and characterization of novel iron-oxidizing bacteria that grow at circumneutral pH. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4784–4792. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.12.4784-4792.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kato S, Krepski S, Chan C, Itoh T, Ohkuma M. 2014. Ferriphaselus amnicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a neutrophilic, stalk-forming, iron-oxidizing bacterium isolated from an iron-rich groundwater seep. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:921–925. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.058487-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Probst AJ, Castelle CJ, Singh A, Brown CT, Anantharaman K, Sharon I, Hug LA, Burstein D, Emerson JB, Thomas BC, Banfield JF. 2017. Genomic resolution of a cold subsurface aquifer community provides metabolic insights for novel microbes adapted to high CO2 concentrations. Environ Microbiol 19:459–474. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hernsdorf AW, Amano Y, Miyakawa K, Ise K, Suzuki Y, Anantharaman K, Probst A, Burstein D, Thomas BC, Banfield JF. 2017. Potential for microbial H2 and metal transformations associated with novel bacteria and archaea in deep terrestrial subsurface sediments. ISME J 11:1915–1929. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hiraishi A, Hoshino Y, Satoh T. 1991. Rhodoferax fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., a phototrophic purple nonsulfur bacterium previously referred to as the “Rhodocyclus gelatinosus-like” group. Arch Microbiol 155:330–336. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Johnson BD, Hallberg KB. 2008. Carbon, Iron and Sulfur Metabolism in Acidophilic Micro-organisms, p 201–255. In Poole RK (ed), Advances in microbial physiology, vol 54. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SUPPLEMENTAL FILE 1

Supplemental material. Download SPECTRUM00161-21_Supp_1_seq4.pdf, PDF file, 2.5 MB (2.6MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequence data and the complete genome sequence of MIZ03 have been deposited in the DDBJ under the accession numbers DRA011244 and AP024238, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES