Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2021 Oct 28;87(22):e01562-21. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01562-21

A Synergistic Consortium Involved in rac-Dichlorprop Degradation as Revealed by DNA Stable Isotope Probing and Metagenomic Analysis

Shunli Hu a, Guiping Liu a, Long Zhang a, Yufeng Gan a, Baozhan Wang a, Shiri Freilich b, Jiandong Jiang a,
Editor: Ning-Yi Zhouc
PMCID: PMC8552887  PMID: 34524896

ABSTRACT

rac-Dichlorprop, a commonly used phenoxyalkanoic acid herbicide, is frequently detected in environments and poses threats to environmental safety and human health. Microbial consortia are thought to play key roles in rac-dichlorprop degradation. However, the compositions of the microbial consortia involved in rac-dichlorprop degradation remain largely unknown. In this study, DNA stable isotope probing (SIP) and metagenomic analysis were integrated to reveal the key microbial consortium responsible for rac-dichlorprop degradation in a rac-dichlorprop-degrading enrichment. OTU340 (Sphingobium sp.) and OTU348 (Sphingopyxis sp.) were significantly enriched in the rac-[13C]dichlorprop-labeled heavy DNA fractions. A rac-dichlorprop degrader, Sphingobium sp. strain L3, was isolated from the enrichment by a traditional enrichment method but with additional supplementation of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin, which was instructed by metagenomic analysis of the associations between rac-dichlorprop degraders and antibiotic resistance genes. As revealed by functional profiling of the metagenomes of the heavy DNA, the genes rdpA and sdpA, involved in the initial degradation of the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of dichlorprop, respectively, were mostly taxonomically assigned to Sphingobium species, indicating that Sphingopyxis species might harbor novel dichlorprop-degrading genes. In addition, taxonomically diverse bacterial genera such as Dyella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Achromobacter were presumed to synergistically cooperate with the key degraders Sphingobium/Sphingopyxis for enhanced degradation of rac-dichlorprop.

IMPORTANCE Understanding of the key microbial consortium involved in the degradation of the phenoxyalkanoic acid herbicide rac-dichlorprop is pivotal for design of synergistic consortia used for enhanced bioremediation of herbicide-contaminated sites. However, the composition of the microbial consortium and the interactions between community members during the biodegradation of rac-dichlorprop are unclear. In this study, DNA-SIP and metagenomic analysis were integrated to reveal that the metabolite 2,4-dichlorophenol degraders Dyella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Achromobacter synergistically cooperated with the key degraders Sphingobium/Sphingopyxis for enhanced degradation of rac-dichlorprop. Our study provides new insights into the synergistic degradation of rac-dichlorprop at the community level and implies the existence of novel degrading genes for rac-dichlorprop in nature.

KEYWORDS: DNA stable isotope probing, metagenomics, rac-dichlorprop, bacterial consortium, rdpA, sdpA

INTRODUCTION

The raceme of the dichlorprop, rac-dichlorprop [(R,S)-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)propanoic acid], a phenoxyalkanoic acid herbicide, is widely used worldwide to control broad-leaf weeds in crop farms and nonagricultural fields (1, 2). Due to its extensive use and high solubility in water, rac-dichlorprop was persistently residual in diverse environments, including groundwater and soil (3, 4). rac-Dichlorprop has moderate to low toxicity for most aquatic organisms (48-h 50% effective concentration [EC50] of >100 mg liter−1) and is a potential risk to human health (5, 6).

The microorganism-mediated environmental fate of rac-dichlorprop is of interest. rac-Dichlorprop degraders, including Sphingobium herbicidovorans MH, Delftia acidovorans MC1, Alcaligenes sp. strain CS1, Ralstonia sp. strain CS2, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia PM, Rhodoferax sp. strain P230, and Sphingopyxis sp. strain DBS4, have been isolated by traditional cultivation-dependent approaches in recent decades (713). Microbial degradation of phenoxyalkanoic acid herbicides usually initiates with the cleavage of the side chain to produce corresponding phenols, which is catalyzed by Fe(II)/α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. For nonchiral herbicides such as 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate (2,4-D) and 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetate (MCPA), the dioxygenase involved is typically TfdA, which is encoded by the tfdA gene (14). Regarding the chiral herbicide rac-dichlorprop, the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of dichlorprop are initially transformed to 2,4-dichlorophenol and pyruvate by RdpA and SdpA, respectively. The corresponding genes rdpA and sdpA encoding these two enantiospecific dioxygenases were characterized in Sphingobium herbicidovorans MH and Delftia acidovorans MC1, respectively (15, 16). 2,4-Dichlorophenol was further catabolized via a classic pathway (15, 16). A microbial consortium rather than a single species is well recognized to play more important roles in the enhanced degradation of organic pollutants (17). However, the key microbial consortium and the interactions between community members during the synergistic degradation of rac-dichlorprop remain largely unclear (18).

Stable isotope probing (SIP) is a cultivation-independent technique that can be used to effectively investigate the functional microorganisms involved in biogeochemical processes (1925). In addition, metagenomics is the study of the entire genomes of all microbes from an environmental sample and provides useful taxonomic, functional, and evolutionary information (26). In our previous study, an enrichment culture capable of degrading rac-dichlorprop was obtained from a rac-dichlorprop-contaminated soil in an abandoned pesticide factory in Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (31°57′9.58″N, 118°50′24.07″E), and a bacterial strain, Sphingopyxis sp. DBS4, capable of utilizing rac-dichlorprop as sole carbon source for growth was isolated from the enrichment (13). Knowing the importance of the microbial consortium in rac-dichlorprop degradation, DNA-SIP and metagenomic analysis were integrated to reveal the key microbial consortium involved in rac-dichlorprop degradation in the enrichment in this study. The interactions between the key degraders and the metabolite degraders were also investigated, and a new rac-dichlorprop degrader was isolated with additional supplementation of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin, which was instructed by the metagenomic analysis of the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) of 13C-labeled DNA. In addition, novel genes involved in rac-dichlorprop degradation were indicated to exist in nature.

RESULTS

Key bacteria involved in rac-dichlorprop degradation as revealed by DNA-SIP.

Biodegradation of rac-[12C]dichlorprop ([12C]dichlorprop) and rac-[13C]dichlorprop ([13C]dichlorprop) by the enrichment was carried out in microcosms. No significant differences between the degradation of [12C]dichlorprop and [13C]dichlorprop were found (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). rac-Dichlorprop (30 mg liter−1) was completely degraded within 6 days by the enrichment, while nearly no degradation of rac-dichlorprop was found in the control.

Genomic DNA of the [12C]dichlorprop- and [13C]dichlorprop-labeled samples was extracted at 4 days (approximately 75% of rac-dichlorprop was degraded) and then separated by isopycnic centrifugation. The relationships between buoyant density and the fraction number are listed in Fig. S2. Quantification of functional degrading genes in each fraction by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) showed that the abundances of rdpA and sdpA genes were higher in fractions 5 to 7 (buoyant density, 1.734 to 1.725 g ml−1) of the [13C]dichlorprop-labeled samples (highest in fraction 6) than in fractions 8 to 9 (buoyant density, 1.720 to 1.716 g ml−1) of the [12C]dichlorprop-labeled samples (Fig. S3). The DNA in fractions 5 to 7 of the [13C]dichlorprop-labeled samples was referred to as the “heavy DNA.”

The 16S rRNA genes of each fraction (from 5 to 9) of [12C]dichlorprop- and [13C]dichlorprop-labeled samples were analyzed by high-throughput sequencing. In total, 1,773,096 sequences were obtained from the 30 fractions (five fractions of two samples in triplicate), and 474 different operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (at 97% identity) were detected in all samples. Different abundances of taxonomically affiliated OTUs in equivalent fractions (fractions 5 to 9) between [13C]dichlorprop- and [12C]dichlorprop-labeled samples were found (Fig. S4). The genomic DNA of those microorganisms that have assimilated [13C]dichlorprop will shift from fractions 8 to 9 (with normal buoyant density of 1.720 to 1.716 g ml−1) to fractions 5 to 7 (with higher buoyant density of 1.734 to 1.725 g ml−1). So, bacteria (represented by OTUs) showing relatively higher abundances in fractions 5 to 7 of the [13C]dichlorprop-labeled samples compared to those in [12C]dichlorprop-labeled samples were defined as key species involved in rac-dichlorprop degradation. The relative abundances of OTU340 and OTU348 in fractions 5 to 9 of [12C]dichlorprop-labeled samples were 0.30%, 0.24%, 0.42%, 0.31% and 0.10% and 0.30%, 0.07%, 0.32%, 0.11%, and 0.01%, respectively. However, in equivalent fractions 5 to 9 of [13C]dichlorprop-labeled samples, the relative abundances of OTU340 and OTU348 were 2.18%, 12.63%, 4.11%, 0.50%, and 0.01% and 29.34%, 45.20%, 2.94%, 0.11%, and 0.02%, respectively. The results showed that OTU340 and OTU348 were enriched at fractions 5 to 7 (with a higher buoyant density of >1.725 g ml−1) in [13C]dichlorprop-labeled samples (Fig. 1). By phylogenetic analysis, OTU340 and OTU348 were assigned to the genera Sphingobium and Sphingopyxis, respectively (Fig. S5). The results indicated that Sphingobium and Sphingopyxis species have assimilated [13C]carbon from rac-dichlorprop and are the key species involved in rac-dichlorprop degradation.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Relative abundances of OTU340 (Sphingobium) and OTU348 (Sphingopyxis) at different buoyant densities of [13C]- and [12C]dichlorprop-labeled samples.

Functional profiling of metagenomes.

Metagenome sequencing was employed to reveal the potential metabolic pathways of rac-dichlorprop degraders and the associations between rac-dichlorprop degraders and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). The metagenomes of fraction 6 of [13C]- and [12C]dichlorprop-labeled samples were sequenced. As a result, a total of 213,576,692 and 214,582,596 clean reads were generated, and 57,683 and 36,285 contigs were obtained, respectively. In the metagenome of the [12C]dichlorprop-labeled fraction 6, Dyella (26.8%), Dokdonella (15.5%), and Methylobacillus (10.4%) were the three most dominant genera, followed by Pseudomonas (7.2%), Achromobacter (4.9%), Rhodanobacter (4.4%), Rudaea (4.3%), and Mizugakiibacter (3.0%). In contrast, in the metagenome of the [13C]dichlorprop-labeled fraction 6, Sphingopyxis (23.4%), Dyella (16.0%), and Sphingobium (12.1%) were the three most dominant genera, followed by Dokdonella (9.8%), Pseudomonas (4.1%), Sphingomonas (3.4%), Rudaea (2.7%), Achromobacter (2.7%), Rhodanobacter (2.6%), and Methylobacillus (2.3%) (Fig. S6).

The potential metabolic pathways of the metagenomes were predicted by KEGG database (Fig. 2a and b). At KEGG pathway level 1, “metabolism” was the most abundant functional category in both metagenomes (Fig. 2a). Interestingly, the relative abundance of “xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism” of the [13C]dichlorprop-labeled metagenome (4.7%) was higher than that of the [12C]dichlorprop-labeled metagenome (3.3%) at KEGG pathway level 2 (Fig. 2b). These results indicated that genomic DNA of functional microorganisms capable of degradation of xenobiotics (including rac-dichlorprop) was enriched in fraction 6 of the heavy DNA sample.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

KEGG functional abundance analysis. (a) Relative abundances of [12C]- and [13C]dichlorprop-labeled samples at KEGG pathway level 1; (b) relative abundances of [12C]- and [13C]dichlorprop-labeled samples at KEGG pathway level 2.

To explore the associations between rac-dichlorprop-degrading bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), the [13C]dichlorprop-labeled metagenome was subjected to a BLAST search against the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD). At the class level, Dyella, Sphingopyxis, and Sphingobium contributed 21.5%, 16.4%, and 10% of the antibiotic resistance (AR), respectively (Fig. S7a). Because Sphingobium and Sphingopyxis were involved in rac-dichlorprop degradation as revealed by DNA-SIP, the CARD was further applied to analyze the relationships between ARGs and the genera Sphingobium and Sphingopyxis. As shown in Fig. S7b, Sphingobium and Sphingopyxis harbored most ARGs jointly at the antibiotic resistance ontology (ARO) level. Sphingobium contributed 22.9% and 9.6% and Sphingopyxis contributed 15.8% and 24.5% of the fluoroquinolone ARGs mfd and patA, respectively. These results suggested that fluoroquinolone antibiotics could be used to enrich and isolate rac-dichlorprop-degrading strains (potentially belonging to the genus Sphingobium or Sphingopyxis) from enrichment.

The contributions of active taxa (genus level) for rac-dichlorprop degradation in the [13C]dichlorprop-labeled metagenome were further analyzed. Subsequently, a stacked chart was generated by calculating the relative abundances of microbial taxa in the metabolic pathways in the [13C]dichlorprop-labeled metagenome (Fig. S8a). The contributions of active taxa (genus level) for metabolic pathways were calculated. The abundances of six genera (Sphingobium, Sphingopyxis, Dyella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Achromobacter) were all associated with the “chlorocyclohexane and chlorobenzene degradation pathways” (KEGG pathway level 3, ko00361) and contributed 46.1%, 16.3%, 12.4%, 9.4%, 3.0%, and 1.63% to the ko00361 pathway, respectively. Notably, Sphingobium and Sphingopyxis appeared to associate directly with metabolic activities, and their contributions to degradation seemed to be better defined. The taxonomic affiliations of enzymes responsible for 2,4-dichlorophenol degradation were mostly assigned to the four genera Dyella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Achromobacter based on the analysis of the [13C]dichlorprop-labeled metagenome (Fig. S8b). These findings indicated that Dyella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Achromobacter species (most likely to be involved in the degradation of the metabolite 2,4-dichlorophenol) might interact with the key degraders Sphingobium/Sphingopyxis for the synergistic degradation of rac-dichlorprop.

Isolation of new degraders for rac-dichlorprop and its metabolite from the enrichment.

Due to the close associations between rac-dichlorprop degraders and fluoroquinolone antibiotic resistance genes, a traditional continuous enrichment method with additional supplementation of 5 mg liter−1 ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic, was used to isolate rac-dichlorprop degraders from the enrichment. A bacterial strain of Sphingobium, L3, capable of degrading rac-dichlorprop, was successfully isolated from the enrichment. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of Sphingobium sp. strain L3 shared 99.7% similarity with that of the DNA-SIP-identified OTU340 (Fig. S5), further confirming that OTU340 (Sphingobium) was truly involved in rac-dichlorprop degradation. rac-Dichlorprop, (R)-dichlorprop, or (S)-dichlorprop (30 mg liter−1) was completely degraded by strain L3 (inoculated at an initial optical density at 600 nm [OD600] of 0.05) within 12 h in mineral salt medium (MSM) (Fig. S9) and the OD600 of strain L3 cells increased to the final value of 0.09, indicating that rac-dichlorprop could be utilized by strain L3 as the sole carbon and energy source for growth. Strain L3 preferred to degrade (R)-dichlorprop over (S)-dichlorprop (Fig. S9). Strain L3 harbored both rdpA and sdpA genes, which showed 100% similarities to rdpA (AF516752) and sdpA (AJ628860) genes from Sphingobium herbicidovorans MH, respectively (data not shown).

In addition, a bacterial strain of Achromobacter sp., D1, was isolated from the enrichment using 2,4-dichlorophenol as the enriching substrate, and the 16S rRNA gene sequence of Achromobacter sp. D1 shared 100% similarity with OTU265 (Fig. S10a). It was found that 30 mg liter−1 2,4-dichlorophenol was completely degraded by strain D1 within 12 h in MSM (Fig. S10b). The OD600 of strain D1 cells increased from the initial 0.05 to a final 0.08 (Fig. S10b), indicating that 2,4-dichlorophenol could be utilized by strain D1 as the sole carbon and energy source for growth. However, strain D1 did not degrade rac-dichlorprop.

Enhanced degradation of rac-dichlorprop by a synergistic consortium.

The degradation efficiencies for rac-dichlorprop and cell growths of different artificial consortia were compared. The 2,4-dichlorophenol degrader Achromobacter sp. D1 instead of the nondegrader Escherichia coli significantly promoted the degradation efficiencies of both Sphingobium sp. L3 (the rac-dichlorprop degrader isolated from the enrichment in this study) and Sphingopyxis sp. DBS4 (the rac-dichlorprop degrader isolated from the enrichment previously in our lab [13]) (Fig. 3, left). In addition, the biomass of the consortia strain L3 plus strain D1 and strain DBS4 plus strain D1 increased more than that of consortia strain L3 plus E. coli and strain DBS4 plus E. coli (Fig. 3, right). All these data showed that Achromobacter sp. D1 can synergistically cooperate with Sphingobium sp. L3/Sphingopyxis sp. DBS4 in the enrichment to promote rac-dichlorprop degradation and cell growth.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Degradation of rac-dichlorprop by and cell growth of different artificial consortia. Strains used in the artificial consortia were strain DBS4 (rac-dichlorprop degrader isolated previously in our lab), strain L3 (rac-dichlorprop degrader isolated in this study), strain D1 (2,4-dichlorophenol degrader isolated in this study), and E. coli (the nondegrader). Each strain was inoculated at an initial OD600 of 0.02, so the consortia containing two strains were inoculated at an initial OD600 of 0.04.

Taxonomical assignment of known rac-dichlorprop-degrading genes to bacterial genera.

To explore the associations between rac-dichlorprop degraders and known degrading genes, the assigning between rac-dichlorprop-degrading bacteria (Sphingobium and Sphingopyxis) and functional genes (rdpA and sdpA) was further analyzed. A total of 1,348 and 65,908 reads matching rdpA and 1,320 and 68,896 reads matching sdpA were found in the metagenomes of [12C]dichlorprop- and [13C]dichlorprop-labeled fraction 6, respectively (Fig. 4a), showing that rdpA and sdpA genes were enriched in the [13C]dichlorprop-labeled metagenome.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Taxonomical assignment of rdpA and sdpA genes to bacterial genera. (a) rdpA and sdpA gene read numbers in [12C]- and [13C]dichlorprop-labeled metagenomes. (b) rdpA and sdpA genes taxonomically assigned to bacterial genera based on metagenomic analysis of the [12C]- and [13C]dichlorprop-labeled metagenomes.

Phylogenetic analysis of rdpA and sdpA genes found in the metagenomes showed that these initial degrading genes were closely related to the rdpA and sdpA genes reported in Sphingobium herbicidovorans MH (Fig. S11). As shown in Fig. 4b, both rdpA and sdpA genes were taxonomically assigned to the genus Sphingobium, while neither rdpA nor sdpA was assigned to the genus Sphingopyxis. This result indicated that Sphingopyxis species in our enrichment might harbor novel genes for rac-dichlorprop degradation, which is consistent with our previous finding that neither the rdpA nor the sdpA gene was found in our isolated strain Sphingopyxis sp. DBS4 (13).

DISCUSSION

Microorganisms usually live in complex communities. Community members interact with each other, shaping the structure and function of the community. rac-Dichlorprop degradation in environments is commonly carried out by a microbial consortium rather than a single species. In this study, DNA-SIP and metagenomic analysis were integrated to investigate the key microbial consortium involved in the degradation of rac-dichlorprop. Microorganisms represented by OTU340 and OTU348 were shown to play key roles in rac-dichlorprop degradation by the culture-independent method DNA-SIP. Phylogenetic analysis of OTU340 showed its close relationship to Sphingobium species, a Sphingomonadaceae member, which has been extensively confirmed for its versatile capacities to degrade various organic pollutants (2730). Interestingly, a bacterial strain of Sphingobium sp. L3, capable of utilizing rac-dichlorprop as the sole carbon and energy source for growth, was also isolated from the enrichment, further confirming the role of Sphingobium species. In addition, the SIP-identified OTU348 shared 100% similarity to the 16S rRNA gene sequence of Sphingopyxis sp. DBS4 (MH553106) (see Fig. S5 in the supplemental material), a rac-dichlorprop-utilizing strain previously isolated from the same enrichment in our laboratory (13). Our results confirmed that Sphingobium and Sphingopyxis species were directly responsible for rac-dichlorprop degradation in the enrichment.

Analysis of the initial degrading genes for (R)- and (S)-dichlorprop in the [12C]- and [13C]dichlorprop-labeled metagenomes revealed a higher abundance of rdpA and sdpA genes in the [13C]dichlorprop-labeled metagenome, showing that these functional genes were enriched in the heavy DNA fraction. Both rdpA and sdpA genes were taxonomically assigned to the genus Sphingobium, while neither the rdpA nor the sdpA gene was assigned to the genus Sphingopyxis. Interestingly, nearly identical rdpA (AF516752) and sdpA (AJ628860) genes were found in the genome of Sphingobium sp. strain L3 (data not shown), while neither the rdpA nor the sdpA gene was detected in Sphingopyxis sp. DBS4 (13). These findings indicated that a potential novel dioxygenase gene involved in the initial degradation of rac-dichlorprop exists in the enrichment, especially in Sphingopyxis species.

At the genus level, Sphingobium, Sphingopyxis, Dyella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Achromobacter showed 46.1%, 16.3%, 12.4%, 9.4%, 3.0%, and 1.63% relative contributions to the “chlorocyclohexane and chlorobenzene degradation pathways” (KEGG pathway level 3, ko00361), respectively. Sphingobium and Sphingopyxis species, as confirmed by DNA-SIP and degrading-strain isolation experiments, utilized rdpA, sdpA, and even novel genes to enantioselectively transform (R)-dichlorprop and (S)-dichlorprop to pyruvate and the nonchiral metabolite 2,4-dichlorophenol. Then, rac-dichlorprop-degrading strains have assimilated [13C]carbon from 2,4-dichlorophenol. A part of 2,4-dichlorophenol was assimilated by 2,4-dichlorophenol-degrading strains. Based on metagenomic analysis, taxonomically diverse bacterial species of genera such as Dyella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Achromobacter were presumed to synergistically cooperate with Sphingobium/Sphingopyxis species for enhanced degradation of rac-dichlorprop (Fig. 5).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

A synergistic consortium involved in rac-dichlorprop degradation. Specific strains including Sphingobium, Sphingopyxis, Dyella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Achromobacter species and the initial dioxygenases involved in the degradation of (R)- and (S)-dichlorprop are shown. TCA cycle, tricarboxylic acid cycle.

The metabolite 2,4-dichlorophenol was reported to be hydroxylated to 3,5-dichlorocatechol by a phenol hydroxylase, and 3,5-dichlorocatechol was finally mineralized via 2,4-dichloro-cis,cis-muconate, trans-2-chlorodienelactone, cis-2-chlorodienelactone, 2-chloromaleylacetate, and maleylacetate (15). Sphingomonas agrestis 58-1, Pseudomonas sp. strain GT241-1, and Achromobacter sp. strain LZ35 were reported to use 2,4-dichlorophenol as the sole carbon source for growth (3136). More interestingly, the Achromobacter sp. D1, capable of utilizing 2,4-dichlorophenol as its sole carbon source for growth, was also isolated from the enrichment. In natural environments, degradation of organic compounds is often carried out by a microbial consortium rather than a single species. Many experiments have shown that cell growth and substrate utilization are frequently higher in a mixed culture (consortium) than in a single species (17, 37, 38). The enhanced degradation of pollutants by a consortium compared to a pure culture is potentially due to the complementarity of degradation pathways of individual members in the consortium (39, 40). On the other hand, cross-feeding (metabolites produced by one strain being utilized by others) between the community members also plays important roles in the better performance of the consortium (41). In our study, Dyella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Achromobacter species (e.g., Achromobacter sp. D1) in the enrichment are most likely involved in the degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol or its metabolites, which reduces the inhibition effect of 2,4-dichlorophenol on the key degraders such as Sphingobium sp. L3 and Sphingopyxis sp. DBS4 (see Fig. S12 in the supplemental material). In addition, the cross-feeding between Sphingobium/Sphingopyxis and Dyella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Achromobacter members also promotes the cell growth of functional microorganisms and increases the stability of the community, thereby enhancing the degradation of rac-dichlorprop.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals and medium.

rac-Dichlorprop (CAS RN 120-36-5) and (R)-dichlorprop (CAS RN 15165-67-0) were obtained from Aladdin Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). (S)-Dichlorprop was obtained by separation of the rac-dichlorprop at Chiralway Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). 13C-labeled rac-dichlorprop ([13C6]dichlorprop, racemic form [see Fig. S13 in the supplemental material]) was obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. (Tewksbury, MA). Except where otherwise stated, rac-dichlorprop was used in this study. All other chemicals and solvents were of highest analytical reagent grade and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany). Mineral salt medium [MSM; 1.0 g NaCl, 1.0 g (NH4)2SO4, 1.5 g K2HPO4, 0.5 g KH2PO4, and 0.2 g MgSO4·7H2O per liter of water, pH 7.0] was used in this study.

Enrichment culture capable of degrading rac-dichlorprop.

An enrichment culture capable of degrading rac-dichlorprop that was derived from a rac-dichlorprop-contaminated soil in an abandoned pesticide factory in Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (31°57′9.58″N, 118°50′24.07″E), was obtained previously (13). The culture was incubated on a rotary shaker at 30°C and 180 rpm, and then 5 ml of subculture was inoculated into 100 ml of fresh MSM containing 30 mg liter−1 of rac-dichlorprop and transferred every 7 days. The rac-dichlorprop-degrading capacity of the enrichment was detected via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described below.

SIP experiment.

Two milliliters of the enrichment cultures was added to 18 ml of MSM supplemented with 30 mg liter−1 of unlabeled rac-dichlorprop ([12C]dichlorprop) or 13C-labeled rac-dichlorprop ([13C]dichlorprop) and then incubated at 30°C. MSM (20 ml) supplemented with 30 mg liter−1 of [12C]dichlorprop or [13C]dichlorprop was used as the control. At 4 days, approximately 75% of rac-dichlorprop (30 mg liter−1) was degraded in both samples (Fig. S1), and then the DNA was extracted, respectively, using a FastDNA Spin kit (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA content was determined using an ND-2000 UV-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). The experiments were carried out in triplicate.

Approximately 5 μg DNA of each sample was dissolved in Tris-EDTA (pH 8.0)–CsCl solution at a final buoyant density of ∼1.72 g ml−1 and then poured into a Quick-Seal centrifuge tube (13 by 51 mm, 5.1 ml; Beckman Coulter, Pasadena, CA). Buoyant density was obtained by a digital refractometer (model AR200; Leica Microsystems Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL). The centrifuge tube was ultracentrifuged (Optima L-100XP; Beckman Coulter) at 45,000 rpm (20°C) for 44 h after heat sealing. Subsequently, DNA was fractionated in the tube, and then targeted fractions were collected by a fraction recovery system (Beckman Coulter). Finally, 14 fractions (400 μl each) were collected and the DNA in each fraction was purified using the method described by Thomas et al. (20).

The primers 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) (42, 43) were used to amplify the V3-V4 variable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene derived from fractions 5 to 9, and then the amplification products were sequenced at Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Raw Fastq files were demultiplexed and quality filtered by Trimmomatic and merged using FLASH. Trimmed sequences were clustered to operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with a 97% similarity cutoff using UPARSE, and chimeric sequences were removed using UCHIME. The taxonomical assignment of OTUs was performed by the RDP Classifier algorithm against the Silva database using a confidence threshold of 70%.

Quantification of the rdpA and sdpA genes by qPCR.

The rdpA [the initial gene for (R)-dichlorprop degradation] or sdpA [the initial gene for (S)-dichlorprop degradation] gene copy numbers in each collected fraction of [12C]dichlorprop and [13C]dichlorprop samples were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR in an Applied Biosystems 7300 real-time PCR system using a SYBR Premix Ex Taq RT-PCR kit (TaKaRa). The rdpA and sdpA genes were amplified using the primer pairs rdpA-f/rdpA-r and sdpA-f/sdpA-r1/sdpA-r2, respectively (44). Calibration curves of qPCR were obtained using serial dilutions of the plasmid pCETA/Blunt-Zero/rdpA carrying the rdpA gene or the plasmid pCETA/Blunt-Zero/sdpA carrying the sdpA gene. An equation was used to calculate the number of gene copies as previously described (45).

Metagenome sequencing.

As revealed by qPCR, the abundances of the functional genes rdpA and sdpA were highest in fraction 6 (buoyant density, 1.729 g ml−1) of the [13C]dichlorprop sample. The triplicate metagenomes of fraction 6 from [13C]dichlorprop samples were combined as a metagenome and then randomly fragmented into ∼400-bp fragments using a Covaris M220 focused ultrasonicator (Covaris, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA). Then, a library was prepared using the NEXTflex rapid DNA-Seq kit (Bioo Scientific Corp., Austin, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The metagenome of fraction 6 of the [12C]dichlorprop sample was also sequenced and used as the control. The two metagenomes were sequenced by Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Adaptor removal and quality filtering were performed on raw reads using FASTP (https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp), and quality-trimmed reads that contained N (ambiguous bases) or were shorter than 50 bp were discarded by FASTP. To acquire contigs, MEGAHIT was used to assemble high-quality reads (46). The open reading frames (ORFs) of the assembled contigs were predicted by MetaGene (47). ORFs (length of >100 bp) were selected to establish the Non-Redundant (NR) gene catalog. Representative sequences of the NR gene catalog were annotated based on the NCBI NR database using blastp with an E value cutoff of 1e−5 using Diamond (48). The KEGG annotation was conducted using Diamond against the KEGG database (version 94.2) with an E value cutoff of 1e−5. To explore the distribution patterns between rac-dichlorprop degraders and ARGs, annotation of ARGs was conducted using Diamond against the CARD (https://card.mcmaster.ca/home, version 3.0.9) (E value of ≤10−5). Prediction of genes (ARGs, rdpA, sdpA, and 2,4-dichlorophenol catabolic genes) was carried out using blastp against the NCBI NR database with an E value of ≤10−5. The blastp results were annotated using MEGAN for assignment of taxonomic genus (49). The relative function/gene contribution of a taxon was represented by the abundance of the taxon relative to the total abundance of all taxa involved in the function/gene, which was calculated by summing the abundance of the taxon participating in the functions/genes assigned to that total abundance of all taxa involved in the functions/genes (50). The sum of abundances of all taxa/functions/genes detected in each subject was 1. Top 10 relative function/gene contribution of a taxon was selected for analysis, while other taxa were merged into others.

Isolation of degrading strains from the enrichment culture.

To isolate rac-dichlorprop-degrading strains from the enrichment culture, 5 mg liter−1 ciprofloxacin was added because strains involved in rac-dichlorprop degradation might be resistant to fluoroquinolone antibiotics (indicated by metagenomic analysis). After continuative enrichment with ciprofloxacin for three rounds, the enrichment culture was diluted and plated onto LB agar plates containing 5 mg liter−1 ciprofloxacin. Individual colonies grown on the plates were checked for their capabilities to degrade rac-dichlorprop. Finally, a rac-dichlorprop-degrading strain, designated L3, was isolated.

To isolate 2,4-dichlorophenol-degrading strains from the enrichment culture, the enrichment culture was diluted with sterile water, diluted on LB agar plates containing 30 mg liter−1 2,4-dichlorophenol, and then incubated at 30°C for 1 week. Individual colonies on the plates were further tested for their 2,4-dichlorophenol-degrading capability. Finally, a 2,4-dichlorophenol-degrading strain, designated D1, was isolated. A taxonomy analysis of the isolated strains was carried out as described previously (51), and strains L3 and D1 were identified as Sphingobium and Achromobacter species, respectively.

Degradation of rac-dichlorprop by artificial consortia.

Degradations of rac-dichlorprop by different artificial consortia with or without the 2,4-dichlorophenol degrader were compared. Strains used in the artificial consortia were Sphingopyxis sp. strain DBS4 (rac-dichlorprop degrader isolated previously in our lab [13]), Sphingobium sp. strain L3 (rac-dichlorprop degrader isolated in this study), Achromobacter sp. strain D1 (2,4-dichlorophenol degrader isolated in this study), and E. coli (the nondegrader). Artificial consortia were set as follows: (i) strain DBS4 and strain D1 (OD600, 0.02:0.02), (ii) strain L3 and strain D1 (OD600, 0.02:0.02), (iii) strain DBS4 and E. coli (OD600, 0.02:0.02), and (iv) strain L3 and E. coli (OD600, 0.02:0.02). Strain DBS4 alone (OD600, 0.02) and strain L3 alone (OD600, 0.02) were set for comparison. The concentration of rac-dichlorprop and the cell density of each consortium were measured every 4 h by HPLC and UV spectrophotometry, respectively. All treatments were carried out in triplicate.

HPLC analysis of rac-dichlorprop.

rac-Dichlorprop in liquid medium was extracted with an equal volume of dichloromethane-acetic acid (99:1, vol/vol), and the extract was evaporated and redissolved in methanol. The resulting solution was filtered through a 0.22-mm-pore Millipore membrane. rac-Dichlorprop was determined by an HPLC system (UltiMate 3000 Titanium) coupled with a C18 reversed-phase column (5 μm, 250 mm by 4.6 mm). The mobile phase, consisting of 80% methanol (methanol-water, vol/vol) and 1.0% glacial acetic acid, was delivered at a flow rate of 1.0 ml min−1 at 30°C. The injection volume was 20 μl, and the detection wavelength of rac-dichlorprop was 230 nm.

Data availability.

Sequences of 16S rRNA gene amplicons and metagenomics are available at NCBI under BioProject ID PRJNA730391.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the grants from the NSFC-ISF joint program (41961144024), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31870087 and 31900077), and the Israel Science Foundation (grant no. 3164/19).

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
Fig. S1 to S13. Download AEM.01562-21-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 1.3 MB (1.3MB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Jiandong Jiang, Email: jiang_jjd@njau.edu.cn.

Ning-Yi Zhou, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Tomlin C (ed). 1994. The pesticide manual, 10th ed. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, Surrey, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ma Y, Jiang J, Xu C, Lu X. 2012. Enantioselective inhibition of dichlorprop on catalase. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89:945–949. 10.1007/s00128-012-0815-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gintautas PA, Daniel SR, Macalady DL. 1992. Phenoxyalkanoic acid herbicides in municipal landfill leachates. Environ Sci Technol 26:517–521. 10.1021/es00027a011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Malaguerra F, Albrechtsen HJ, Thorling L, Binning PJ. 2012. Pesticides in water supply wells in Zealand, Denmark: a statistical analysis. Sci Total Environ 414:433–444. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhu Y, Zhang D, He L. 2020. Enantioselective biodegradation and enantiomerization of dichlorprop in soils. Chemosphere 258:127322. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pesticide Properties DataBase. 2018. Dichlorprop_P. University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom. http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/Reports/219.htm.
  • 7.Horvath M, Ditzelmüller G, Loidl M, Streichsbier F. 1990. Isolation and characterization of a 2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) propionic acid-degrading soil bacterium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33:213–216. 10.1007/BF00176527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Müller RH, Jorks S, Kleinsteuber S, Babel W. 1999. Comamonas acidovorans strain MC1: a new isolate capable of degrading the chiral herbicides dichlorprop and mecoprop and the herbicides 2,4-D and MCPA. Microbiol Res 154:241–246. 10.1016/S0944-5013(99)80021-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mai P, Jacobsen OS, Aamand J. 2001. Mineralization and cometabolic degradation of phenoxyalkanoic acid herbicides by a pure bacterial culture isolated from an aquifer. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:486–490. 10.1007/s002530000589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ehrig A, Müller RH, Babel W. 1997. Isolation of phenoxy herbicide-degrading Rhodoferax species from contaminated building material. Acta Biotechnol 17:351–356. 10.1002/abio.370170411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Smejkal CW, Vallaeys T, Seymour FA, Burton SK, Lappin-Scott HM. 2001. Characterization of (R/S)-mecoprop [2-(2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxy) propionic acid]-degrading Alcaligenes sp. CS1 and Ralstonia sp. CS2 isolated from agricultural soils. Environ Microbiol 3:288–293. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tett VA, Willetts AJ, Lappin-Scott HM. 1997. Biodegradation of the chlorophenoxy herbicide (R)-(+)-mecoprop by Alcaligenes denitrificans. Biodegradation 8:43–52. 10.1023/A:1008262901202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang L, Hang P, Zhou X, Qiao W, Jiang J. 2020. Enantioselective catabolism of the two enantiomers of the phenoxyalkanoic acid herbicide dichlorprop by Sphingopyxis sp. DBS4. J Agric Food Chem 68:6967–6976. 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c01066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fukumori F, Hausinger RP. 1993. Purification and characterization of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate/alpha-ketoglutarate dioxygenase. J Biol Chem 268:24311–24317. 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)80527-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Müller TA, Byrde SM, Werlen C, van der Meer JR, Kohler H-PE. 2004. Genetic analysis of phenoxyalkanoic acid degradation in Sphingomonas herbicidovorans MH. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6066–6075. 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6066-6075.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schleinitz KM, Kleinsteuber S, Vallaeys T, Babel W. 2004. Localization and characterization of two novel genes encoding stereospecific dioxygenases catalyzing 2(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)propionate cleavage in Delftia acidovorans MC1. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5357–5365. 10.1128/AEM.70.9.5357-5365.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xu X, Zarecki R, Medina S, Ofaim S, Liu X, Chen C, Hu S, Brom D, Gat D, Porob S, Eizenberg H, Ronen Z, Jiang J, Freilich S. 2019. Modeling microbial communities from atrazine contaminated soils promotes the development of biostimulation solutions. ISME J 13:494–508. 10.1038/s41396-018-0288-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tett VA, Willetts AJ, Lappin-Scott HM. 1994. Enantioselective degradation of the herbicide mecoprop [2-(2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxy) propionic acid] by mixed and pure bacterial cultures. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 14:191–200. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1994.tb00105.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gutierrez T, Singleton DR, Berry D, Yang T, Aitken MD, Teske A. 2013. Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria enriched by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill identified by cultivation and DNA-SIP. ISME J 7:2091–2104. 10.1038/ismej.2013.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Thomas F, Corre E, Cébron A. 2019. Stable isotope probing and metagenomics highlight the effect of plants on uncultured phenanthrene-degrading bacterial consortium in polluted soil. ISME J 13:1814–1830. 10.1038/s41396-019-0394-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Song M, Luo C, Jiang L, Peng K, Zhang D, Zhang R, Li Y, Zhang G. 2019. The presence of in situ sulphamethoxazole degraders and their interactions with other microbes in activated sludge as revealed by DNA stable isotope probing and molecular ecological network analysis. Environ Int 124:121–129. 10.1016/j.envint.2018.12.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lerner H, Ztürk B, Dohrmann AB, Thomas J, Marchal K, Mot RD, Dehaen W, Tebbe CC, Springael D. 2020. Culture-independent analysis of linuron-mineralizing microbiota and functions in on-farm biopurification systems via DNA-stable isotope probing: comparison with enrichment culture. Environ Sci Technol 54:9387–9397. 10.1021/acs.est.0c02124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tao X, Feng J, Yang Y, Wang G, Tian R, Fan F, Ning D, Bates CT, Hale L, Yuan M, Wu W, Gao Q, Lei J, Schuur EAG, Yu J, Bracho R, Luo Y, Konstantinidis KT, Johnston ER, Cole JR, Penton CR, Tiedje JM, Zhou J. 2020. Winter warming in Alaska accelerates lignin decomposition contributed by Proteobacteria. Microbiome 8:84. 10.1186/s40168-020-00838-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Carrión O, Gibson L, Elias DMO, McNamara NP, van Alen TA, den Camp HJMO, Supramaniam CV, McGenity TJ, Murrell JC. 2020. Diversity of isoprene-degrading bacteria in phyllosphere and soil communities from a high isoprene-emitting environment: a Malaysian oil palm plantation. Microbiome 8:81. 10.1186/s40168-020-00860-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liang J, Gao S, Wu Z, Rijnaarts HHM, Grotenhuis T. 2021. DNA-SIP identification of phenanthrene-degrading bacteria undergoing bioaugmentation and natural attenuation in petroleum-contaminated soil. Chemosphere 266:128984. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.New FN, Brito IL. 2020. What is metagenomics teaching us, and what is missed? Annu Rev Microbiol 74:117–135. 10.1146/annurev-micro-012520-072314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cai S, Chen L, Ai Y, Qiu J, Wang C, Shi C, He J, Cai T. 2017. Degradation of diphenyl ether in Sphingobium phenoxybenzoativorans SC-3 is initiated by a novel ring cleavage dioxygenase. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e00104-17. 10.1128/AEM.00104-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhao Q, Yue S, Bilal M, Hu H, Wang W, Zhang X. 2017. Comparative genomic analysis of 26 Sphingomonas and Sphingobium strains: dissemination of bioremediation capabilities, biodegradation potential and horizontal gene transfer. Sci Total Environ 609:1238–1247. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hu S, Cheng X, Liu G, Lu Y, Qiao W, Chen K, Jiang J. 2020. Degradation of chlorothalonil via thiolation and nitrile hydration by marine strains isolated from the surface seawater of the Northwestern Pacific. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 154:105049. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2020.105049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang J, Chen D, Jiang J. 2020. Preferential catabolism of the (S)‐enantiomer of the herbicide napropamide mediated by the enantioselective amidohydrolase SnaH and the dioxygenase Snpd in Sphingobium sp. strain B2. Environ Microbiol 22:286–296. 10.1111/1462-2920.14847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ka JO, Holben WE, Tiedje JM. 1994. Genetic and phenotypic diversity of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)-degrading bacteria isolated from 2,4-D-treated field soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1106–1115. 10.1128/aem.60.4.1106-1115.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tomasi I, Artaud I, Bertheau Y, Mansuy D. 1995. Metabolism of polychlorinated phenols by Pseudomonas cepacia AC1100: determination of the first two steps and specific inhibitory effect of methimazole. J Bacteriol 177:307–311. 10.1128/jb.177.2.307-311.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Quan X, Shi H, Zhang Y, Wang H, Qian Y. 2004. Biodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol and phenol in an airlift inner-loop bioreactor immobilized with Achromobacter sp. Sep Purif Technol 34:97–103. 10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00181-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhong W, Sun M, He G, Feng X, Yu Z. 2004. Isolation of 2,4-dichlorophenol degrading bacterium strain and cloning and expression of its 2,4-dichlorophenol hydroxylase gene. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 20:209–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shimojo M, Kawakami M, Amada K. 2009. Analysis of genes encoding the 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid-degrading enzyme from Sphingomonas agrestis 58-1. J Biosci Bioeng 108:56–59. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xia Z, Zhang L, Zhao Y, Yan X, Li S, Gu T, Jiang J. 2017. Biodegradation of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by a new isolated strain of Achromobacter sp. LZ35. Curr Microbiol 74:193–202. 10.1007/s00284-016-1173-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Weightman A, Slater J. 1988. The problem of xenobiotics and recalcitrance, p 322–347. In Lynch J, Hobbie J (ed), Microorganisms in action: concepts and applications in microbial ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu X, Chen K, Chuang S, Xu X, Jiang J. 2019. Shift in bacterial community structure drives different atrazine-degrading efficiencies. Front Microbiol 10:88. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.de Souza ML, Newcombe D, Alvey S, Crowley DE, Hay A, Sadowsky MJ, Wackett LP. 1998. Molecular basis of a bacterial consortium: interspecies catabolism of atrazine. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:178–184. 10.1128/AEM.64.1.178-184.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang Z, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Hesham AL, Yang M. 2006. Molecular characterization of a bacterial consortium enriched from an oilfield that degrades phenanthrene. Biotechnol Lett 28:617–621. 10.1007/s10529-006-0023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yang C, Yang L, Zhang K, Wang X, Ma C, Tang H, Xu P. 2010. Atrazine degradation by a simple consortium of Klebsiella sp. A1 and Comamonas sp. A2 in nitrogen enriched medium. Biodegradation 21:97–105. 10.1007/s10532-009-9284-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner FO. 2013. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e1. 10.1093/nar/gks808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zakrzewski M, Goesmann A, Jaenicke S, Jünemann S, Eikmeyer F, Szczepanowski R, Al-Soud WA, Sørensen S, Pühler A, Schlüter A. 2012. Profiling of the metabolically active community from a production-scale biogas plant by means of high-throughput metatranscriptome sequencing. J Biotechnol 158:248–258. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Paulin MM, Nicolaisen MH, Sorensen J. 2010. Abundance and expression of enantioselective rdpA and sdpA dioxygenase genes during degradation of the racemic herbicide (R,S)-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)propionate in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:2873–2883. 10.1128/AEM.02270-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ritalahti KM, Amos BK, Sung Y, Wu Q, Koenigsberg SS, Löffler FE. 2006. Quantitative PCR targeting 16S rRNA and reductive dehalogenase genes simultaneously monitors multiple Dehalococcoides strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2765–2774. 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2765-2774.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Noguchi H, Park J, Takagi T. 2006. MetaGene: prokaryotic gene finding from environmental genome shotgun sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 34:5623–5630. 10.1093/nar/gkl723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. 2015. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 12:59–60. 10.1038/nmeth.3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Huson DH, Mitra S, Ruscheweyh HJ, Weber N, Schuster SC. 2011. Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. Genome Res 21:1552–1560. 10.1101/gr.120618.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhu L, Liao R, Wu N, Zhu J, Yang C. 2019. Heat stress mediates changes in fecal microbiome and functional pathways of laying hens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:461–472. 10.1007/s00253-018-9465-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hu S, Huang J, Yang M, Jia W, Ke Z, Hu B, Jiang J. 2019. Pedobacter helvus sp. nov. isolated from farmland soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:3806–3811. 10.1099/ijsem.0.003684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

Fig. S1 to S13. Download AEM.01562-21-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 1.3 MB (1.3MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Sequences of 16S rRNA gene amplicons and metagenomics are available at NCBI under BioProject ID PRJNA730391.


Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES