ABSTRACT
Results from previous investigations into spontaneous rifampin resistance (Rifr) mutations in the Bacillus subtilis rpoB gene suggested that the spectrum of mutations depends on the growth environment. However, these studies were limited by low sample numbers, allowing for the potential distortion of the data by the presence of “jackpot” mutations that may have arisen early in the growth of a population. Here, we addressed this issue by performing fluctuation analyses to assess both the rate and spectrum of Rifr mutations in two distinct media: LB, a complete laboratory medium, and SMMAsn, a minimal medium utilizing l-asparagine as the sole carbon source. We cultivated 60 separate populations under each growth condition and determined the mutation rate to Rifr to be slightly but significantly higher in LB cultures. We then sequenced the relevant regions of rpoB to map the spectrum of Rifr mutations under each growth condition. We found a distinct spectrum of mutations in each medium; LB cultures were dominated by the H482Y mutation (27/53 or 51%), whereas SMMAsn cultures were dominated by the S487L mutation (24/51 or 47%). Furthermore, we found through competition experiments that the relative fitness of the S487L mutant was significantly higher in SMMAsn than in LB medium. We therefore conclude that both the spectrum of Rifr mutations in the B. subtilis rpoB gene and the fitness of resulting mutants are influenced by the growth environment.
IMPORTANCE The rpoB gene encodes the beta subunit of RNA polymerase, and mutations in rpoB are key determinants of resistance to the clinically important antibiotic rifampin. We show here that the spectrum of mutations in Bacillus subtilis rpoB depends on the medium in which the cells are cultivated. The results show that the growth environment not only plays a role in natural selection and fitness but also influences the probability of mutation at particular bases within the target gene.
KEYWORDS: RNA polymerase, transcription, Bacillus subtilis, fitness, mutation, rifampin, rpoB
INTRODUCTION
Because genetic variation is the raw material of evolution, understanding how microbial genomes respond and adapt to changing environments is a fundamental issue in microbiology. In their natural habitats, microorganisms rarely, if ever, encounter optimal growth conditions due to nutrient limitations or the presence of environmental stressors; these environmental limitations comprise the selective pressures that drive evolution. In the classical view, random mutations generate the genetic variability upon which the environment selects. But do mutations occur randomly? Experiments dating back to Benzer's investigations of the phage T4 rII region in the 1950's indicate that the answer is no. Along the rII region, mutations were far from randomly distributed; certain “hot spots” accumulated mutations at a much higher frequency than others (1). While the exact reason for this is unknown, it is suspected that the sequence context, regional DNA conformation, or DNA supercoiling state influence the probability of a particular nucleotide sustaining a mutation (2, 3). Because DNA architecture changes in response to the external environment (4, 5), it stands to reason that the rate of mutation at a particular nucleotide may also respond to environmental changes.
A growing body of evidence indicates that the environment not only serves as the agent of selection but also plays a role in determining what range of mutations are possible within a gene, i.e., its mutational spectrum. This phenomenon has been eloquently demonstrated recently in a series of experiments using Escherichia coli grown under six different nutritional environments, either unlimited or limited for carbon, oxygen, phosphate, iron, or nitrogen (6). It was observed that the frequency of mutation only increased in two of the six nutritionally depleted stress regimes. However, growth in each medium produced a unique spectrum of mutations in the cycA gene encoding cycloserine resistance (6). In another recent study, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was cultivated in seven different environments that maintained both relatively high growth rates and minimal cell death, and the rates and spectra of mutation were measured using whole-genome sequencing (7). The authors found significant differences in the ratio of transitions to transversions and in the AT mutational bias (i.e., the extent to which GC-to-AT mutations were more frequent than AT-to-GC mutations) in different media (7). These studies lend credence to the notion that a spontaneous mutation is simply a mutation where the environmental influence is unknown (2).
Based on extensive experimental testing, it was concluded that the spectrum of mutations arising in the E. coli genome in response to environmental or genetic factors could be monitored accurately by analyzing mutations leading to resistance to the antibiotic rifampin (Rif) (8). Rif is a potent inhibitor of prokaryotic transcription initiation (9) and has a history of use both in bacterial transcription studies and in treatment of various bacterial infections, particularly the mycobacterial diseases tuberculosis and leprosy. Resistance to Rif (Rifr) arises from mutations in the rpoB gene encoding the β subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP) (10). Mutations conferring Rifr are generally localized to 4 regions within the rpoB gene, designated the N-cluster and clusters I, II, and III (11), with most mutations occurring within cluster I. From three-dimensional crystal structures of RNAP-Rif complexes, it is seen that most Rifr mutations occur at conserved residues within the Rif binding pocket, localized to the RNA exit channel, where binding of Rif physically blocks progression of the nascent transcript through the exit channel (12, 13).
We have been investigating how the external environment affects the spectrum of mutations leading to Rifr in the rpoB gene of Bacillus subtilis. To date, we have observed alterations in the mutational spectrum of rpoB after cultivation under environmental conditions, including vegetative growth versus sporulation (14) and aerobic versus anaerobic growth (15). Moreover, we recently observed an alteration in the spectrum of Rifr mutations in the rpoB gene of B. subtilis grown under microgravity conditions on the International Space Station compared to matched ground controls (16).
A potential drawback of our early studies measuring the spectrum of Rifr rpoB mutations in B. subtilis derived from the rather small numbers of mutants examined, which could have led to statistical artifacts. To remedy this situation, in the present study we have measured the frequency and spectrum of mutation to Rifr in the B. subtilis rpoB gene in 120 total populations cultivated under two different environmental conditions, a complex laboratory medium (LB) versus Spizizen minimal medium containing the amino acid l-asparagine (Asn) as the sole carbon source (SMMAsn). This minimal medium was chosen for two reasons. First, it was considered more representative of conditions that B. subtilis might encounter in its natural soil habitat, given the role of root exudate Asn in influencing the composition of the rhizosphere microbiome (17). Second, metabolic profiling of various Rifr B. subtilis rpoB mutants revealed that a particular rpoB mutant carrying the S487L substitution exhibited significantly increased utilization of Asn over the wild-type strain (18). To bring greater statistical power to the experiment, we examined using fluctuation analysis the occurrence of Rifr rpoB mutations in 60 independent cultures of B. subtilis cultivated in LB versus 60 independent cultures in SMMAsn. Sequencing of the resulting Rifr regions of rpoB from the Rifr mutant collections resulted in the finding that the spectrum of Rifr mutations indeed differed significantly between the two growth conditions. Finally, we tested the competitive fitness of the predominant rpoB mutations under each growth condition. With these experiments we were able to contrast the spectrum of mutations observed in a typical laboratory environment (LB) with one that more closely approximates the natural soil habitat of B. subtilis (SMMAsn).
RESULTS
Growth in LB and SMMAsn.
For fluctuation analysis, in each of three separate experiments we inoculated 20 individual 2-ml cultures in either LB or SMMAsn, incubated the cultures for 24 h, and determined final cell densities as described in Materials and Methods. Because it had previously been determined that the frequency of mutation to Rifr in B. subtilis was on the order of ∼10−8 to ∼10−9 (14), we chose the initial population to be ∼105 cells per culture to ensure that fewer than 1 out of 1,000 cultures would be predicted to carry a preexisting Rifr mutant. The final collection of data consisted of 6 data sets, n = 20 each, for a total of 120 separate cultures. We determined the final population sizes for each culture, performed a log10 transformation of the data, and then screened the data sets for outliers. The final cell density of only one culture (SMMAsn experiment 1, culture 16) was anomalously high and found to be a statistical outlier, which was discarded. All 6 screened data sets were next determined to be normally distributed and, thus, amenable to normal statistics. The average 24-h cell densities were calculated to be 1.10 × 109 ± 1.42 × 108 and 8.06 × 108 ± 2.68 × 108 CFU/ml for LB and SMMAsn cultures, respectively. Testing of the data sets by analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the difference in growth between LB and SMMAsn cultures was slight (1.36-fold) but highly statistically significant (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1).
FIG 1.
Twenty-four-hour cell densities of B. subtilis cells cultivated in LB and in SMMAsn. Data are averages ± standard deviations. Averages from each set of 3 replicate experiments (Rep), each consisting of n = 20, are indicated by dashed lines. No significant difference (ns) was observed between replicates in the same media (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test, P > 0.05). Comparison of all experiments in LB versus SMMAsn (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test, P < 0.0001) is denoted.
Mutation frequencies to Rifr.
Each culture was concentrated and plated on medium containing rifampin to determine mutation frequencies to Rifr. Screening of log10-transformed data sets revealed that cultures containing zero Rifr mutants were outliers and, thus, were removed. The screened data sets were found to be normally distributed. The average frequencies for mutation to Rifr were calculated to be 1.10 × 10−8 ± 6.25 × 10−10 for LB cultures and 4.22 × 10−9 ± 6.08 × 10−10 for SMMAsn cultures, respectively. The log10-transformed data sets were next tested for statistical differences by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test. Neither the three replicate cultures in LB nor the three replicate cultures in SMMAsn were significantly different among themselves (P > 0.803) (Fig. 2). However, all three LB data sets were significantly different from all three SMMAsn data sets (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2). By this analysis, it appeared that strain 168 mutated to Rifr at a slightly (∼2.6-fold) but significantly higher frequency in LB than in SMMAsn.
FIG 2.
Frequency mutation to Rifr in B. subtilis cultivated in LB versus SMMAsn. Data are averages ± standard deviations. Dashed lines indicate the averages from 3 separate replicates (Rep). No significant difference (ns) was observed between replicates in the same media (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test, P > 0.05). Mutation frequency was significantly higher in LB than in SMMAsn cultures (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test, P < 0.0001).
Mutation rates to Rifr.
Although the mutation frequency is a relatively simple parameter to calculate, it is inherently inaccurate because the number of mutants in any culture depends on when during the growth period the initial mutation occurred (19). We therefore took advantage of the large number of cultures (n = 60 from each growth condition) to perform fluctuation analysis and calculate the mutation rate, μ, the probability of Rifr mutation per generation, under each growth condition. In prior experiments we established that in B. subtilis, the MIC for Rif was <0.1 μg/ml (data not shown); thus, the selective concentration used in the experiment (5 μg/ml) was ∼50× the MIC. From the initial (N1; ∼105) and final (N2; ∼109) number of cells in each culture and the growth equation (logN2 − logN1)/0.313, it was estimated that each population had passed through ∼13 generations. The numbers of Rifr mutants and total cells were measured from each culture, and fluctuation analysis was performed using an online calculator, bz-rates (20). The data were observed to exhibit reasonable goodness of fit to the Luria-Delbrück distribution; the distributions and population statistics are shown in Fig. 3. The mutation rates (μ) were calculated to be 3.33 × 10−9 and 1.66 × 10−9 for cells cultivated in LB and SMMAsn, respectively, an approximately 2-fold difference between the two growth conditions.
FIG 3.
Mutation rate analysis. Fit of data (black dots) to the Luria-Delbrück distribution (LD model; dashed line) and statistics for 60 cultures grown in either LB (A) or SMMAsn (B). Note different scales on x axes.
Spectrum of Rifr rpoB mutations in LB and SMMAsn cultures.
To ensure that each Rifr mutation had arisen independently, a single Rifr mutant was selected from each culture for mutation spectrum analysis. The N-cluster and clusters I, II, and III of the rpoB gene were PCR amplified from Rifr mutants obtained from each LB and SMMAsn culture. Nucleotide sequences were determined from a total of 53 LB and 51 SMMAsn Rifr mutants (Table 1), and the data are summarized graphically in Fig. 4. All mutations were located in cluster I, which forms the Rif-binding pocket in Escherichia coli RpoB (12) and, by analogy, in B. subtilis RpoB (16). This observation is consistent with prior studies indicating that most mutations leading to Rifr occur in cluster I in E. coli (10, 11).
TABLE 1.
Summary of rpoB mutations leading to Rifr in B. subtilis LB and SMMAsn cultures
Mutation | No. of mutations per replicate(s) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
Total |
|||||
LB | SMMAsn | LB | SMMAsn | LB | SMMAsn | LB | SMMAsn | |
S465P | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Q469K | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Q469R | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Q469L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
D472N | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
D472V | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
A478D | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
A478V | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
H482D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
H482P | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
H482N | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
H482R | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
H482Y | 10 | 6 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 27 | 14 |
S487L | 2 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 24 |
No mutation found | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
Other | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Total | 19 | 19 | 20 | 19 | 20 | 14 | 59 | 52 |
FIG 4.
(Top) Schematic diagram of the B. subtilis RpoB protein sequence (red bar). Yellow boxes denote the positions of the N-cluster and clusters I, II, and III where Rifr mutations have been located (11). Gray bars denote the regions amplified by PCR and sequenced using the corresponding primers (black arrows). (Bottom) Expanded graphic summary of the distribution of Rifr mutations within cluster I of the B. subtilis rpoB gene. The center row depicts the RpoB amino acid sequence from amino acids 465 to 489, flanked above and below by the wild-type rpoB nucleotide sequence. Mutations identified in LB and SMMAsn cultures are denoted above and below the central line, respectively. Each small, colored box represents an independently sequenced mutation, and the corresponding amino acid alteration is indicated in a large white box above. Three shades of gray and blue are used to represent the three separate replicate cultures grown in LB and SMMAsn, respectively.
Prior studies of mutations in B. subtilis rpoB leading to Rifr have documented that the most common amino acid changes occur in cluster I at amino acids Q469, H482, and S487 (14–16, 18, 21, 22). The mutation spectrum data corresponding to these three positions (Table 1) were normalized as percentages of total point mutations that occurred within cluster N, I, II, or III of the rpoB gene, which were determined to be distributed normally and analyzed by ANOVA (Fig. 5). Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the percentage of mutations at Q469 in cells cultivated in LB versus SMMAsn (Fig. 5). However, a noteworthy shift was observed in the proportion of mutations occurring at H482 and S487, depending on the growth medium used (Fig. 5). In cells cultivated in LB, most Rifr mutations in rpoB occurred at residue H482 (68.5% ± 3.2% of total). In contrast, cells cultivated in SMMAsn accumulated mostly the S487L mutation (47.9% ± 8.1% of total) (Fig. 5). When mutations at H482 were examined more closely, it was seen that the H482Y allele predominated under both growth conditions (Table 1).
FIG 5.
Percentage of total Rifr mutations observed at Q469, H482, and S487 within RpoB in B. subtilis cells cultivated in LB (black bars) versus SMMAsn (blue bars). Data are averages ± standard deviations (n = 3) and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. ns, not significantly different.
In addition to mutations at Q469, H482, and S487, additional Rifr mutations were observed in minor proportions at S465, D472, and A478, as have been noted previously. Two new Rifr alleles were observed in this study, S465P and D472N. The discovery of these new alleles is likely due to the lower concentration of Rif (5 μg/ml) used to select for Rifr in this study than was used in most previous studies (50 μg/ml). In 6 of the 111 Rifr mutants sequenced, we did not find mutations in cluster N, I, II, or III. This phenomenon has been reported previously (16, 23) and is likely to have occurred for two potential reasons. First, the mutations may have occurred in rpoB but were outside the canonical Rifr clusters. Considering that the regions we sequenced in this study only cover ∼38% of the entire rpoB sequence, this is entirely possible. Second, the mutations may be located elsewhere in the genome outside the rpoB gene. For example, low-level Rifr has been previously reported in mutants with altered permeability or efflux (24).
Transitions and transversions in LB versus SMMAsn.
With the exception of one mutation, a +3-bp insertion (labeled as “Other” in Table 1), all mutations corresponding to rpoB cluster N, I, II, or III were found to be single-base changes leading to single-amino-acid substitutions. Given the different spectra of mutations seen in LB versus SMMAsn cultures (Table 1 and Fig. 5), we wondered if the types of mutations seen (transitions versus transversions) also differed in cells grown under the two conditions. The results of this analysis (Fig. 6) showed that cells suffered mostly (∼85%) transition mutations, with the vast majority being C-to-T transitions (Fig. 6). The data sets were found to be normally distributed and were analyzed using ANOVA; no significant differences in the frequency of transition or transversion mutations were measured under either growth condition (Fig. 6).
FIG 6.
Distribution of transition and transversion mutations in B. subtilis cells grown in either LB (black bars) or SMMAsn (blue bars). (x axis) The bottom letter represents the original wild-type nucleotide in rpoB; the top letter indicates the mutant nucleotide that replaced the wild-type nucleotide in rpoB. Data are averages ± standard deviations from n = 3 replicates. No significant differences in the percentage of a given type of transition or transversion mutation were observed in different growth environments (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test, P > 0.9999).
Relative fitness of predominant rpoB alleles.
As reported above, a dramatic difference in the frequency of Rifr mutations at H482 and S487 was observed in LB versus SMMAsn medium. Given that the methodology we used for determining the spectrum of mutation in the rpoB gene captured only one mutant per population, mutants that exhibit a less severe fitness deficit without selective pressure would be more likely to be detected. To test whether relative fitness contributes to the difference in the observed frequency of a given mutation, we devised a series of pairwise competition experiments. Strains harboring either the wild-type rpoB allele or the H482Y or S487L mutation were each competed against a congenic wild-type strain (strain WN1651) in either LB or SMMAsn medium for 21 generations in triplicate independent experiments (Fig. 7). The data were found to be normally distributed and, thus, amenable to analysis by normal statistics.
FIG 7.
Pairwise competition experiments. Wild-type (w.t.) strain WN1675 (black bars) and Rifr strains carrying the variant H482Y (strain WN760; blue bars) or S487L (strain WN761; yellow bars) were each competed against congenic wild-type strain WN1651 in LB or SMMAsn medium for 21 generations, and fitness coefficients (S) were calculated as described previously (39). Data are averages ± standard deviations (n = 3) and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. Degree of statistical significance is denoted with asterisks (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001). Nonstatistically significant differences are denoted by ns (P > 0.05).
In LB medium, strains carrying either the H482Y or S487L mutation were significantly less fit than the wild-type strain, and there was no significant difference in fitness between the two mutant strains (Fig. 7). In marked contrast, in SMMAsn medium we observed that the S487L mutant exhibited a significantly less severe fitness deficit than the H482Y mutant. Visual inspection of the data suggested that in SMMAsn medium the S487L mutant was less fit than the wild type, but the difference in their fitness was found not to be significant at the P < 0.05 level (Fig. 7). This increase in the fitness of the S487L mutant in SMMAsn medium may be related to its increased ability to metabolize Asn, as measured by OmniLog phenotype microarray analysis (18). However, further studies would be required to confirm the specific mechanism resulting in the increased fitness of S487L relative to H482Y in SMMAsn.
DISCUSSION
In this communication, we showed that the medium in which B. subtilis cells are cultivated exerts an effect on the resulting spectrum of mutations in the rpoB gene to Rifr. There may be several reasons underlying this observation. First, different external environments may impact the internal chemical environment within a B. subtilis cell in a distinct manner. For example, it has been shown that acid stress lowers the cytoplasmic pH (45); osmotic stress increases the internal concentrations of compatible solutes such as proline, glycine betaine, ectoine, potassium, etc. (25), and the core of dormant spores has a dramatically lower water content and contains a high concentration of calcium dipicolinic acid (26). One could argue that such differences in the internal chemical environment engendered by cultivation in complex LB versus minimal SMMAsn medium differentially affect the reactivity of individual bases in DNA, resulting in different spectra of mutations (14). Second, three-dimensional nucleoid architecture (5, 27) and DNA supercoiling (46) are essential components of genetic regulation in prokaryotes, and both are sensitive to growth rate and the external environment. Because the transcription of different sets of genes is required for optimal growth in LB versus SMMAsn, it follows that changes in chromosome architecture and supercoiling also alter the reactivity of particular DNA bases, altering the possible spectrum of mutations in these two environments, in agreement with previous experiments using the yeast S. cerevisiae (7). While the experiments described here clearly show that the mutational spectrum of rpoB responds to the growth environment, they do not directly address which possible mechanism(s) may be involved. This question could be addressed experimentally by measuring 3-dimensional genome-wide chromosome architecture via chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) experiments (5) or DNA supercoiling of proxy plasmid molecules by 2-dimensional electrophoresis (28).
Under either growth environment, we noted that the preponderance of mutations (70 to 80%) observed in rpoB consisted of C-to-T transitions (Fig. 6). In a classic study of mutational hot spots in the Escherichia coli lacI gene, it was shown that 5-methylcytosine (5mC) was a hot spot for C-to-T transitions (29). This observation prompted us to search for 5mC sites in the B. subtilis rpoB gene. In an unrelated project we had previously determined the B. subtilis methylome (data not shown). Searching this data set revealed 37 5mC sites in the rpoB sequence; however, none of them coincided with the location of the Rifr mutations reported here (Fig. 4).
In bacteria, RNAP is the central macromolecular machine responsible for contacting every promoter and transcribing every gene in the cell. A large body of evidence indicates that the identity and location of particular Rifr mutations in B. subtilis rpoB can exert a wide variety of pleiotropic effects, including alterations in exponential growth rate and developmental events, such as competence for DNA-mediated transformation, temperature-sensitive sporulation, temperature-sensitive germination (30), and catabolite repression-resistant sporulation and spore resistance properties (31); altering patterns of substrate metabolism and enhanced utilization of uncommon nutrient substrates (18); activation of a cryptic antibiotic biosynthetic operon (32); and altered transcription termination through enhancement of the action of Rho and sensitivity to the elongation factor NusG (33) (reviewed in reference 34). Thus, it is clear that single-amino-acid changes in RpoB can exert profound effects on the global transcriptome.
Under standard laboratory conditions, mutations in B. subtilis rpoB leading to a Rifr phenotype have been associated with a fitness burden (15, 30, 35); indeed, Rifr mutants carrying the predominant rpoB alleles isolated from LB and SMMAsn, H482Y and S487L, respectively, were both significantly less fit than the wild type when competed in LB medium (Fig. 7). However, when competed in SMMAsn minimal medium, fitness of the S487L mutant, but not the H482Y mutant, was statistically indistinguishable from that of the wild type (Fig. 7). Thus, cultivation of B. subtilis in SMMAsn medium favored production of the S487L mutation (Table 1, Fig. 4), and the S487L mutant exhibited increased fitness in SMMAsn medium (Fig. 7). This situation may have a clinically relevant analog in the evolution of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of the disease tuberculosis. Numerous studies have documented that, globally, 60% of all Rifr M. tuberculosis clinical isolates carry the RpoB mutation S531L, the equivalent of the B. subtilis S487L mutation (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). It is tempting to speculate that environmental factors within the host (e.g., anaerobiosis, nutritional status, and immune attack) alter the spectrum of spontaneous Rifr mutations in the M. tuberculosis rpoB gene to favor production of the S531L mutation over others, which in turn may confer a fitness advantage in the host. Elucidating the specific details underlying these phenomena will advance our understanding of how microbes evolve to optimally function within such diverse environments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains, media, and culture conditions.
A list of all bacterial strains used in this study is provided in Table 2. Media used were Miller LB medium (36) and Spizizen minimal medium (37) supplemented with 95 mM Asn in place of glucose (SMMAsn). Both media were prepared using ultrapurified (Nanopure) water and were supplemented with the following final concentration of trace minerals: 50 μM CaCl2·2H2O, 5 μM MnCl2·4H2O, 12.5 μM ZnSO4·7H2O, 2 μM CuSO4·5H2O, 2.5 μM CoCl2·6H2O, 2.5 μM Na2MoO4·2H2O, 0.5 μM FeCl3, and 3.5 μM sodium citrate dihydrate. For fluctuation tests, 20 separate cultures (2 ml each in 16-mm test tubes) in either LB or SMMAsn were each inoculated with ∼105 cells from an overnight LB culture. All tubes were incubated on a slant for 24 h in a rotary water bath set to 37°C and 200 rpm, and samples were processed as described below. Each experiment was repeated on three separate occasions, for a total of n = 60 individual cultures per growth condition.
TABLE 2.
Bacterial strains used in this study
Strain | Genotype; phenotype | Source or reference |
---|---|---|
B. subtilis subsp. subtilis strain 168 | trpC2 | 43 |
WN547 | trpC2 pheA1 cat 6His-rpoC; Cmr | 44 |
WN760 | trpC2 pheA1 rpoB-H482Y cat 6His-rpoC; Rifr Cmr | 30 |
WN761 | trpC2 pheA1 rpoB-S487L cat 6His-rpoC; Rifr Cmr | 30 |
WN1651 | trpC2 pheA1 amyE::spc cat 6His-rpoC; Cmr Spcr | This study |
WN1675 | trpC2 pheA1 amyE::erm cat 6His-rpoC; Cmr Ermr | This study |
Mutation frequency determinations.
Following 24 h of growth, from each 2-ml culture a 10-μl aliquot was removed and diluted serially 10-fold in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.5 (PBS), to determine total numbers of CFU/ml. A 1.5-ml aliquot from each remaining culture was pelleted via centrifugation, resuspended in a total volume of 0.15 ml, and plated on LB or SMMAsn agar plates supplemented with Rif (5 μg/ml final concentration) to select for Rifr mutants.
Mutation rate determinations.
For fluctuation analyses, data from sample sets from each growth condition were entered into the online mutation rate calculator bz-rates (http://www.lcqb.upmc.fr/bzrates) (20).
Mutation spectrum determinations.
One Rifr colony from each individual culture was picked, resuspended in 0.01 ml nuclease-free sterile water, and heat lysed for 5 min at 98°C. Cell debris was pelleted via centrifugation. The supernatant was used as the template for PCR amplification of two ∼700-bp amplicons within the rpoB gene spanning the N-cluster and clusters I, II, and III (Fig. 4) using the primer pairs and PCR conditions described in detail previously (16). An aliquot of each PCR product was assessed via 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis for appropriate amplification and length, and the rest of each sample was column purified using a Qiagen PCR purification kit and shipped to Genewiz LLC (South Plainfield, NJ) for Sanger sequencing using the same PCR primers.
Competition assays.
Strains to be competed in pairwise combinations each carried a distinct antibiotic resistance marker (Table 2). Individual overnight cultures of the wild-type strain and each congenic Rifr strain were grown in fresh 2-ml LB cultures under antibiotic selection. Upon entering stationary phase, the optical density at 600 nm of each seed culture was measured, and a volume corresponding to ∼108 cells of each strain was combined into a single mixed culture, which was then diluted 1:100 into 10 ml of either LB or SMMAsn medium lacking selective antibiotics in 125-ml Erlenmeyer flasks. Cultures were grown at 37°C in a temperature-controlled rotary shaking bath with 200-rpm shaking. Every 24 h cultures were diluted 1:100 into fresh nonselective media and cultivation continued. Under these conditions, cultures progress through ∼7 generations per day (38). At 24-h intervals, an aliquot from each culture was diluted serially 10-fold in PBS and plated on two different selective LB plates, each supplemented with the appropriate selective antibiotic. These LB plates were then incubated overnight at 37°C to determine the number of CFU/ml of each strain. Relative fitness was quantified using a previously described selection coefficient model (39).
Statistics.
Number of CFU/ml and mutation frequency data sets from each replicate experiment were log10 transformed and screened for outliers. Following removal of outliers from data, all data sets were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk method (40). Data sets passing the normality test were analyzed for differences by analysis of variance (ANOVA) (41) with Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test (42). All statistical analyses were performed with the statistical graphing software Prism (GraphPad Software). Differences with a P value of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Hatch grants FLA-MCS-005500 and FLA-MCS-006066 to W.L.N.) administered through the Florida Agriculture Experiment Station.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Wayne L. Nicholson, Email: WLN@ufl.edu.
Maia Kivisaar, University of Tartu.
REFERENCES
- 1.Benzer S. 1961. On the topography of the genetic fine structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 47:403–415. 10.1073/pnas.47.3.403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, Wood RD, Schultz RA, Ellenberger T. 2006. DNA repair and mutagenesis, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Massey RC, Rainey PB, Sheehan BJ, Keane OM, Dorman CJ. 1999. Environmentally constrained mutation and adaptive evolution in Salmonella. Curr Biol 9:1477–1480. 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)80117-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dorman CJ. 2019. DNA supercoiling and transcription in bacteria: a two-way street. BMC Mol Cell Biol 20:26. 10.1186/s12860-019-0211-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang XD, Rudner DZ. 2014. Spatial organization of bacterial chromosomes. Curr Opin Microbiol 22:66–72. 10.1016/j.mib.2014.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maharjan RP, Ferenci T. 2017. A shifting mutational landscape in 6 nutritional states: stress-induced mutagenesis as a series of distinct stress input-mutation output relationships. PLoS Biol 15:e2001477. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu HX, Zhang JZ. 2019. Yeast spontaneous mutation rate and spectrum vary with environment. Curr Biol 29:1584–1591. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Garibyan L, Huang T, Kim M, Wolff E, Nguyen A, Nguyen T, Diep A, Hu KB, Iverson A, Yang HJ, Miller JH. 2003. Use of the rpoB gene to determine the specificity of base substitution mutations on the Escherichia coli chromosome. DNA Repair (Amst) 2:593–608. 10.1016/S1568-7864(03)00024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wehrli W, Knüsel F, Schmid K, Staehelin M. 1968. Interaction of rifamycin with bacterial RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 61:667–673. 10.1073/pnas.61.2.667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jin DJ, Gross CA. 1988. Mapping and sequencing of mutations in the Escherichia coli rpoB gene that lead to rifampicin resistance. J Mol Biol 202:45–58. 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90517-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Severinov K, Soushko M, Goldfarb A, Nikiforov V. 1993. Rifampicin region revisited—new rifampicin-resistant and streptolidigin-resistant mutants in the beta-subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. J Biol Chem 268:14820–14825. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)82407-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Campbell EA, Korzheva N, Mustaev A, Murakami K, Nair S, Goldfarb A, Darst SA. 2001. Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell 104:901–912. 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00286-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Naryshkina T, Mustaev A, Darst SA, Severinov K. 2001. The beta subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is not required for interaction with initiating nucleotide but is necessary for interaction with rifampicin. J Biol Chem 276:13308–13313. 10.1074/jbc.M011041200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nicholson WL, Maughan H. 2002. The spectrum of spontaneous rifampin resistance mutations in the rpoB gene of Bacillus subtilis 168 spores differs from that of vegetative cells and resembles that of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 184:4936–4940. 10.1128/JB.184.17.4936-4940.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nicholson WL, Park R. 2015. Anaerobic growth of Bacillus subtilis alters the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in the rpoB gene leading to rifampicin resistance. FEMS Microbiol Lett 362:fnv213. 10.1093/femsle/fnv213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fajardo-Cavazos P, Leehan JD, Nicholson WL. 2018. Alterations in the spectrum of spontaneous rifampicin-resistance mutations in the Bacillus subtilis rpoB gene after cultivation in the human spaceflight environment. Front Microbiol 9:192. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Carvalhais LC, Dennis PG, Badri DV, Kidd BN, Vivanco JM, Schenk PM. 2015. Linking jasmonic acid signaling, root exudates, and rhizosphere microbiomes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 28:1049–1058. 10.1094/MPMI-01-15-0016-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Perkins AE, Nicholson WL. 2008. Uncovering new metabolic capabilities of Bacillus subtilis using phenotype profiling of rifampin-resistant rpoB mutants. J Bacteriol 190:807–814. 10.1128/JB.00901-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rosche W, Foster P. 2000. Determining mutation rates in bacterial populations. Methods 20:4–17. 10.1006/meth.1999.0901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hamon A, Ycart B. 2012. Statistics for the Luria-Delbrück distribution. Electron J Statist 6:1251–1272. 10.1214/12-EJS711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moeller R, Reitz G, Berger T, Okayasu R, Nicholson WL, Horneck G. 2010. Astrobiological aspects of the mutagenesis of cosmic radiation on bacterial spores. Astrobiology 10:509–521. 10.1089/ast.2009.0429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moeller R, Reitz G, Nicholson WL, Horneck G. 2012. Mutagenesis in bacterial spores exposed to space and simulated martian conditions: data from the EXPOSE-E spaceflight experiment PROTECT. Astrobiology 12:457–468. 10.1089/ast.2011.0739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ahmad S, Al-Mutairi NM, Mokaddas E. 2012. Variations in the occurrence of specific rpoB mutations in rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients of different ethnic groups in Kuwait. Indian J Med Res 135:756–762. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Goldstein BP. 2014. Resistance to rifampicin: a review. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 67:625–630. 10.1038/ja.2014.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bremer E, Kramer R. 2019. Responses of microorganisms to osmotic stress. Annu Rev Microbiol 73:313–334. 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Setlow P. 2016. Spore resistance properties, p 201–215. In Driks A, Eichenberger P (ed), The bacterial spore: from molecules to systems. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang XD, Brandao HB, Le TBK, Laub MT, Rudner DZ. 2017. Bacillus subtilis SMC complexes juxtapose chromosome arms as they travel from origin to terminus. Science 355:524–527. 10.1126/science.aai8982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Roca J. 2009. Two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA topoisomers, p 27–38. In Clarke DJ (ed), DNA topoisomerases: methods and protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Coulondre C, Miller JH, Farabaugh PJ, Gilbert W. 1978. Molecular basis of base substitution hotspots in Escherichia coli. Nature 274:775–780. 10.1038/274775a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Maughan H, Galeano B, Nicholson WL. 2004. Novel rpoB mutations conferring rifampin resistance on Bacillus subtilis: global effects on growth, competence, sporulation, and germination. J Bacteriol 186:2481–2486. 10.1128/JB.186.8.2481-2486.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moeller R, Vlašić I, Reitz G, Nicholson WL. 2012. Role of altered rpoB alleles in Bacillus subtilis sporulation and spore resistance to heat, hydrogen peroxide, formaldehyde, and glutaraldehyde. Arch Microbiol 194:759–767. 10.1007/s00203-012-0811-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Inaoka T, Takahashi K, Yada H, Yoshida M, Ochi K. 2004. RNA polymerase mutation activates the production of a dormant antibiotic 3,3′-neotrehalosadiamine via an autoinduction mechanism in Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem 279:3885–3892. 10.1074/jbc.M309925200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ingham CJ, Furneaux PA. 2000. Mutations in the beta subunit of the Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase that confer both rifampicin resistance and hypersensitivity to NusG. Microbiology (Reading) 146(Pt 12):3041–3049. 10.1099/00221287-146-12-3041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Alifano P, Palumbo C, Pasanisi D, Talà A. 2015. Rifampicin-resistance, rpoB polymorphism and RNA polymerase genetic engineering. J Biotechnol 202:60–77. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cohan FM, King EC, Zawadzki P. 1994. Amelioration of the deleterious pleiotropic effects of an adaptive mutation in Bacillus subtilis. Evolution 48:81–95. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01296.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Miller JH. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Spizizen J. 1958. Transformation of biochemically deficient strains of Bacillus subtilis by deoxyribonucleate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 44:1072–1078. 10.1073/pnas.44.10.1072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Maughan H, Callicotte V, Hancock A, Birky CW, Nicholson WL, Masel J. 2006. The population genetics of phenotypic deterioration in experimental populations of Bacillus subtilis. Evolution 60:686–695. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01148.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Woods RJ, Barrick JE, Cooper TF, Shrestha U, Kauth MR, Lenski RE. 2011. Second-order selection for evolvability in a large Escherichia coli population. Science 331:1433–1436. 10.1126/science.1198914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. 1965. Analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611. 10.2307/2333709. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fisher RA. 1954. The analysis of variance with various binomial transformations. Biometrics 10:130–139. 10.2307/3001667. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Haynes W. 2013. Tukey’s test, p 2303–2304. In Dubitzky W, Wolkenhauer O, Cho K-H, Yokota H (ed), Encyclopedia of systems biology. Springer New York, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Burkholder PR, Giles NH. 1947. Induced biochemical mutations in Bacillus subtilis. Am J Bot 34:345–348. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1947.tb12999.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Qi Y, Hulett FM. 1998. PhoP-P and RNA polymerase sigmaA holoenzyme are sufficient for transcription of Pho regulon promoters in Bacillus subtilis: PhoP-P activator sites within the coding region stimulate transcription in vitro. Mol Microbiol 28:1187–1197. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00882.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Martinez KA, II, Kitko RD, Mershon JP, Adcox HE, Malek KA, Berkman MB, Slonczewski JL. 2012. Cytoplasmic pH response to acid stress in individual cells of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis observed by fluorescence ratio imaging microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:3706–3714. 10.1128/AEM.00354-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dorman CJ, Dorman MJ. 2016. DNA supercoiling is a fundamental regulatory principle in the control of bacterial gene expression. Biophys Rev 8:89–100. 10.1007/s12551-016-0238-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1. Download AEM.01237-21-s0001.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.03 MB (27.5KB, xlsx)