Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2021 Sep 27;13(9):e18310. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18310

Aggressive Perioperative Management for Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura in a Patient Undergoing Open Heart Surgery: A Correct Strategy in an Emergent Patient?

Hamdan Mallick 1,, Sobia T Siddiqui 1, Yasir Khan 2, Ismael Ahmad 3, Syed Shahabuddin 2
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC8553294  PMID: 34725582

Abstract

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune pathology that causes thrombocytopenia. This can become extremely troublesome when dealing with the rare clinical scenario of having to operate a highly invasive procedure on patients with thrombocytopenia. We report a case of a 66-year-old male with multiple comorbidities, including ITP, who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with an aortic valve replacement (AVR). He deteriorated rapidly, prompting urgent procedures. Little to no literature exists on the treatment plan for a critical patient with ITP who is about to undergo an open heart surgery. Our goal was to aggressively treat the patient with prednisolone, azathioprine, and platelets in the short preoperative time in order to maximize the prognosis. Our patient remained stable postoperatively, developed no complications, and was discharged successfully.

Keywords: itp, cabg, cardiac surgery, itp managment, perioperative outcomes, combination therapy in itp

Introduction

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is a condition that causes autoimmune destruction of platelets, increasing the predilection for bleeding and post-cardiac surgical complications [1,2]. We report a case of a 66-year-old male with multiple comorbidities, including ITP, who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with an aortic valve replacement (AVR) and was treated aggressively perioperatively for the emergent procedure. The recommended treatment for this rare clinical scenario includes packed platelets, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), prednisolone, and splenectomy [1-5]. Perioperative management is key when facing an uncommon clinical scenario such as this. There is scarce literature on the relevant treatment regimens for the perioperative management of patients with ITP undergoing CABG. These regimens include aggressive perioperative strategies, such as multiple platelet infusions, steroids, and pharmacological therapy, in order to stabilize the patient and reduce the probability for peri- and postoperative complications.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old male with a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hepatitis B (carrier) was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Immediate echocardiography revealed severe aortic valve stenosis, including a valve area of 1.2 cm2, moderate aortic and mitral regurgitation, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45%. Following this, a left heart cardiac catheterization was done, displaying a triple-vessel coronary artery disease with 80% occlusion of the mid-right coronary artery, 99% occlusion of the obtuse marginal artery, and diffuse disease of the left anterior descending artery (Figure 1) that warranted four coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with a single implanted aortic valve replacement (AVR). Laboratory investigations were standard, except for the severe thrombocytopenia with a 24 × 109/L platelet count (normal count: 150-400 × 109/L). Peripheral blood film displayed normocytic and normochromic red blood cells with low platelet levels. The finding of this severely low platelet count prompted a trephine biopsy, which showed a cellular marrow with trilineage hematopoiesis and normoblastic erythropoiesis. A presumptive diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) was made on the basis of these findings. The patient's condition deteriorated quickly, and the procedure was scheduled with little time to significantly stabilize the platelet count. Preoperative patient optimization was done in collaboration with a multidisciplinary team, which included a hematologist. The goal remained to aggressively try and raise the platelet count while simultaneously treating the underlying ITP to minimize the risk of morbidity and intraoperative complications (Table 1). On this basis, the patient was given 1000 mg methylprednisolone daily for two days, including the surgery day, along with 50 mg oral azathioprine twice a day (BID). On the day of the surgery, blood sugar level was controlled with an insulin sliding scale, and the reported platelet count was 29 × 109/L on complete blood count (CBC). The patient was then transfused with 10 units of platelets, four units of packed red blood cells, and four units of fresh frozen plasma two hours prior to the surgery. Then, 1000 mg each of methylprednisolone, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin was administered prior to skin incision, followed by intraoperative infusion of one unit of whole blood and six units of platelets. Postoperatively, 1000 mg of tranexamic acid was administered. Chest tube drainage was done, followed by timely extubation in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). The postoperative findings on the first day were unremarkable on clinical examination, but peripheral blood examination showed persistent thrombocytopenia with a platelet count of 32 × 109/L, a white blood cell count of 9.5 × 109/L (normal count: 4-10 × 109/L), and hemoglobin of 14.2 g/dL (normal range: 13.7-16.3 g/dL). A consultation with the hematologist resulted in a decision to continue low-dose corticosteroids and a follow-up in two weeks. The total chest drain output was 350 mL in the CICU, and chest tubes were removed on the third postoperative day (POD). The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the eighth POD. Peripheral blood examination on discharge still showed thrombocytopenia with a platelet count of 44 × 109/L, a white blood cell count of 8.3 × 109/L, and hemoglobin of 15.1 g/dL.

Table 1. Aggressive management at each operative stage.

Operative Stage Management and Intervention Platelet Count
Preoperative (Day 1 & 2) 1000 mg methylprednisolone and 50 mg oral azathioprine BID   24 x 10⁹/L
Intraoperative (Day 2) 2 hours prior to incision 10 units of platelets, 4 units of packed red blood cells, 4 units of fresh frozen plasma, and 1000 mg of methylprednisolone     29 x 10⁹/L
During operation 1 unit of whole blood transfusion and 6 units of platelets
Postoperative (Day 2 & 3) 1000 mg tranexamic acid   32 x 10⁹/L

Figure 1. Coronary angiogram: triple-vessel occlusion.

Figure 1

Red arrow: 100% proximal obtuse marginal artery occlusion

Yellow arrow: 80%–90% proximal left anterior descending artery occlusion

Blue arrow: 80% right coronary artery occlusion

Discussion

ITP is an autoimmune pathology resulting from the destruction of platelets by autoantibodies [1-4,6-9]. Thus far, however, complex mechanisms involving impaired platelet production, T-cell-mediated effects, and relative marrow failure have also been proposed [2,3]. Thrombocytopenia resulting from ITP is not protective against acute coronary syndrome, as reported by previous cases [2,6]. This may be due to the coronary thrombosis resulting from abnormal platelet size and increased adhesiveness to the vascular surface or the activation of inflammation and coagulation cascade [2]. A separate theory hypothesized that damage to the endothelial cells caused by autoantibodies that are directed at antigens present on both coronary endothelial cells and platelets may result in myocardial infarction in patients with thrombocytopenia with ITP [7]. In a rare case where a patient with ITP does develop an acute coronary syndrome, prior risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension, and a hypercoagulable state, should be looked at [7]. Our patient had preexisting hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hepatitis B. These comorbidities may have added and contributed to the development of acute coronary syndrome. In the largest sample from a report in literature by Jubelirer et al., mild or moderate cases of thrombocytopenia were significantly supported by intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and platelet transfusions. The role of preoperative short-term prednisone therapy was not helpful in this sample [4]. The role of preoperative prednisone is less conflicted in other studies where its use as a treatment option was reported to be successful as initial treatment [1,3,4]. However, it is important to note that the role of prednisone is most advantageous when it is given over a period of days to weeks in order to allow the platelet count to stabilize [3,4]. In our case, the patient required emergent CABG due to triple-vessel disease. This made the preoperative management quite difficult as a multiple drug regime was needed to prepare the patient for an emergent operation that would not allow enough time for stabilizing the preoperative platelet count. Platelet infusions can be preferred here when a rapid increase in the platelet count is desired [3]. More studies, however, are needed to determine the real effectiveness of prophylactic platelet transfusions [6]. IVIG has also been a viable option in patients refractory to steroid treatment and is even suggested as a possible preoperative treatment of choice [2,9]. The real usefulness of IVIG is in its rapid action [2,3,8]. However, in a lower-middle-income setting such as ours, the availability and cost play against the use of this specific therapy [1]. Splenectomy has been suggested as a second-line treatment option in patients resistant to IVIG therapy. However, this is a high risk procedure and requires several days for an appropriate response [1,9]. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induced platelet dysfunction and the use of anticoagulants postoperatively may put the patient at a higher risk of cardiac tamponade during the immediate and late phase of recovery [8]. This is made worse by the thrombocytopenia as a result of ITP. Hence, the management options of such a patient become extremely subjective and difficult. Excellent response was seen in our patient with preoperative treatment of methylprednisolone, azathioprine, and aggressive transfusion of platelets for raising the platelet count. As recommended by the American Society of Hematology, careful monitoring of the patient's hemodynamic condition was conducted as he was treated with prednisolone while predisposed to hypertension [5]. In patients such as this, life changes may be beneficial. Extra precaution will now need to be taken, given the age of the patient and the probable further treatment with corticosteroids. Importantly, even with platelet counts of up to 50 × 109/L, the American Society of Hematology reports benefit in corticosteroid therapy as compared to routine patient observation [5]. Hypertension, hepatitis, and a history of acute coronary syndrome make monitoring of ITP and geriatric care very imperative, especially given the patient's age and history of extensive comorbidities. An established relationship and consults with a primary care physician, following a complete breakdown of the patient's condition, may allow for motivation for increased routine checkups, labs, and overall patient satisfaction.

Conclusions

Tranexamic acid, azathioprine, steroids, and platelet transfusions can be used for perioperative management of patients with thrombocytopenia caused by ITP. This aggressive management protocol may reduce the need for transfusion and reexploration requirements without burdening the risk for serious adverse reactions postoperatively. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy may be restricted in resource- and time-limited cases. Focusing on an aggressive preoperative treatment regimen will decrease the risk associated with a low and unstable platelet count in an emergent open heart surgery and may also lower postoperative morbidity and complications. In geriatric patients such as our case, extra precautions will have to be taken in order to decrease the risk for future adverse patient outcomes.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.On pump coronary surgical revascularization in a patient with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Fatimi S, Kella DK, Muzaffar M, Hanif HM. https://jpma.org.pk/article-details/1966?article_id=1966. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60:239–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and coronary artery disease: comparison between coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention. Russo A, Cannizzo M, Ghetti G, Barbaresi E, Filippini E, Specchia S, Branzi A. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13:153–157. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2011.271296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coronary artery bypass grafting in immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Mathew TC, Vasudevan R, Leb L, Pezzella SM, Pezzella AT. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:1059–1062. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00763-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): a community hospital experience and review of the literature. Jubelirer SJ, Mousa L, Reddy U, Mir M, Welch CA. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22235705/ W V Med J. 2011;107:10–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia. Neunert C, Terrell DR, Arnold DM, et al. Blood Adv. 2019;3:3829–3866. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coronary artery bypass grafting in idiopathic thrombocytopenia: use of thromboelastometry without platelet transfusion. Rossi M, Lewis M, Hutchinson N. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879213/ Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;37:361–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in a young female with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a case report and review. Yildiz A, Coskun U, Batukan OE, Keskin K. Case Rep Med. 2010;2010:854682. doi: 10.1155/2010/854682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cardiac surgery in a patient with immunological thrombocytopenic purpura: complications and precautions. Chowdhry V, Mohanty BB, Probodh D. Ann Card Anaesth. 2013;16:147–150. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.109774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coronary artery bypass grafting in an immune thrombocytopenic purpura patient using off-pump techniques. Inoue Y, Lim RCH, Nand P. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1819–1821. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01247-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES