Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2021 Aug 13;23(11):2235–2236. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01281-z

Correction to: Cystic fibrosis–related diabetes onset can be predicted using biomarkers measured at birth

Yu-Chung Lin 1, Katherine Keenan 2, Jiafen Gong 2, Naim Panjwani 2, Julie Avolio 3, Fan Lin 2, Damien Adam 4,5, Paula Barrett 6, Stéphanie Bégin 5, Yves Berthiaume 4, Lara Bilodeau 7, Candice Bjornson 8, Janna Brusky 9, Caroline Burgess 10, Mark Chilvers 10, Raquel Consunji-Araneta 11, Guillaume Côté-Maurais 5, Andrea Dale 12, Christine Donnelly 6, Lori Fairservice 8, Katie Griffin 13, Natalie Henderson 14, Angela Hillaby 15, Daniel Hughes 6, Shaikh Iqbal 11, Jennifer Itterman 16, Mary Jackson 17, Emma Karlsen 18, Lorna Kosteniuk 17, Lynda Lazosky 18, Winnie Leung 15, Valerie Levesque 19, Émilie Maille 5, Dimas Mateos-Corral 6, Vanessa McMahon 10, Mays Merjaneh 5, Nancy Morrison 12, Michael Parkins 19, Jennifer Pike 13, April Price 16, Bradley S Quon 18, Joe Reisman 20, Clare Smith 19, Mary Jane Smith 21, Nathalie Vadeboncoeur 7, Danny Veniott 22, Terry Viczko 10, Pearce Wilcox 18, Richard van Wylick 14, Garry Cutting 23, Elizabeth Tullis 13, Felix Ratjen 3,24, Johanna M Rommens 25, Lei Sun 26, Melinda Solomon 24, Anne L Stephenson 13, Emmanuelle Brochiero 4,5, Scott Blackman 23, Harriet Corvol 27,28, Lisa J Strug 1,2,26,29,30,
PMCID: PMC8553623  PMID: 34389817

Correction to: Genetics in Medicine 23: 927–933; 10.1038/s41436-020-01073-x; Article published online 26 January 2021

The risk alleles of rs1964986 (PRSS1) and rs959173 (CAV1) should be the C allele for both variants instead of the A and T alleles listed in the paper. The changes have been reflected in both Figure 1 and Table 2 shown below.graphic file with name 41436_2021_1281_Fig1_HTML.jpg

The original article has been corrected.

Table 2.

Effect sizes (hazard ratios) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) fitted using a multivariate Cox PH model in the CGS. Risk allele/risk group noted in parentheses after the listed predictor.

Gene annotation Predictor Hazard ratio 95% CI
CFTR CFTR mutation score 3.02 (2.01, 4.54)
Sex (female) 1.48 (1.26, 1.74)
SLC5A8 rs12318809 (G) 1.35 (1.16, 1.57)
CAV1 rs959173 (C) 1.27 (1.10, 1.47)
PRSS1 rs1964986 (C) 1.23 (1.09, 1.38)
SLC26A9 rs4077468 (A) 1.20 (1.07, 1.34)
NRG1 rs7822917 (T) 1.31 (1.16, 1.48)
Meconium ileus (MI) 1.29 (1.05, 1.59)
TCF7L2 rs7903146 (T) 1.18 (1.05, 1.34)

Articles from Genetics in Medicine are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES