Abstract
The iron oxo unit, [Fe=O]n+ is a critical intermediate in biological oxidation reactions. While its higher oxidation states are well studied, relatively little is known about the least-oxidized form [FeIII=O]+. Here, the thermally stable complex PhB(AdIm)3Fe=O has been structurally, spectroscopically, and computationally characterized as a bona fide iron(III) oxo. An unusually short Fe–O bond length is consistent with iron–oxygen multiple bond character and is supported by electronic structure calculations. The complex is thermally stable yet is able to perform hydrocarbon oxidations, facilitating both C–O bond formation and dehydrogenation reactions.
Short abstract
The thermally stable complex PhB(AdIm)3Fe=O has been structurally, spectroscopically, and computationally characterized as a bona fide iron(III) oxo.
Iron(IV) oxo species, [FeIV=O]2+, are key intermediates in biological C–H oxidation reactions catalyzed by nonheme iron-containing oxygenases.1,2 Studies of model compounds reveal that hydrocarbon oxidation is initiated by hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) to the oxo ligand, generating the corresponding iron(III) hydroxide, [FeIII–OH]2+.3−7 While hydrogen atom transfer in these reactions usually occurs by a concerted mechanism, for certain substrates a stepwise pathway has also been proposed.8,9 Specifically, initial electron transfer provides an [FeIII=O]+ intermediate, followed by proton transfer to yield the hydroxide.
Little is known about the [FeIII=O]+ unit, although iron(III) oxo species have been characterized in the gas phase10 and implicated as reaction intermediates in solution.11 A handful of iron(III) oxo complexes have been structurally characterized, but it is notable that these all feature second-coordination sphere hydrogen-bond donors that stabilize and shield the oxo ligand,12−14 thereby masking its reactivity.
Here, we report the synthesis and characterization of an iron(III) oxo complex that is devoid of second-coordination sphere hydrogen-bond donors. Structural characterization by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, combined with the electronic structure calculations, confirms iron–oxygen multiple bond character, while multiple spectroscopic methods establish a low-spin (S = 1/2) iron(III) formulation. This exposed [FeIII=O]+ is reactive in oxo transfer and hydrocarbon oxidation reactions, including toluene hydroxylation and ethylbenzene dehydrogenation. Similar transformations are catalyzed by certain nonheme iron(II) and 2-oxogluterate-dependent oxygenases, including in DNA alkylation repair and antibiotic biosynthesis, albeit with the more highly oxidized [FeIV=O]2+ intermediate.15,16
Reaction of the previously reported high-spin (S = 3/2) iron(I) dinitrogen complex PhB(AdIm)3Fe-N2 (1)17 with equimolar N-methylmorpholine N-oxide (or pyridine-N-oxide) provides the purple iron(III) oxo complex PhB(AdIm)3Fe=O (2) in moderate isolated yield (Scheme 1). The molecular structure of 2 has been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, revealing a trigonally symmetric (C3v symmetry) complex in which the iron oxo linkage lies on the molecular 3-fold axis (B–Fe–O angle = 178.15(9)°) (Figure 1a). The complex is notable for an Fe–O distance (1.633(2) Å) that is shorter than all other iron oxo complexes characterized by XRD, regardless of oxidation state.18 The coordination sphere of iron is completed by three short Fe–C distances (1.933(2)–1.952(3) Å), with the iron atom roughly 1.1 Å out of the plane defined by the three carbon donor atoms. A space-filling diagram reveals that the oxo ligand is accessible to substrates, lying within a pocket created by the three adamantyl groups of the tris(carbene)borate ligand (Figure 1b).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Iron(III) Oxo Complex 2.
Figure 1.
(a) X-ray structure of 2; thermal ellipsoids at 50% probability, hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity; (b) space-filling representations; boron, carbon, hydrogen, iron, nitrogen, and oxygen atoms shown with pink, black, white, orange, blue, and red, respectively.
Significantly, there is no hydrogen bond to the oxo ligand in 2 (all O···H distances > 2.5 Å). This is in contrast to other structurally characterized Fe(III) oxo complexes, wherein second-coordination sphere hydrogen-bonding interactions (e.g., O···H distances = 1.7–1.8 Å)13 are critical to stabilizing this unit. As a result, the structural metrics of 2 differ from those for previously reported Fe(III) oxo complexes, with an Fe–O bond distance that is more than 0.2 Å shorter than in [(H3buea)FeO]2– (1.813(3) Å),12 [N(afaCy)3FeO]+ (1.806(1) Å),13 and [LFe3O(PzNHtBu)3FeO]+ (1.817(2) Å).14
In combination with the results of electronic structure calculations (see below), a strong band at 858 cm–1 in the IR spectrum has been assigned to the Fe–O stretching frequency (Figure S10). This frequency is greater than that of the hydrogen-bond stabilized iron(III) oxo [(H3buea)FeO]2– (671 cm–1)10,12 but is in line with the data for other iron oxo complexes (Figure S11). The structural metrics and vibrational data jointly indicate significantly greater iron oxygen multiple bond character in 2 than in hydrogen-bond stabilized iron(III) oxo complexes. As shown below, this difference correlates with both a distinctive electronic structure and chemical reactivity.
The low-temperature EPR spectra of 2 recorded at both X-band (Figure 3a) and Q-band microwave frequencies (Figures S17 and S18) indicate that 2 exhibits a doublet (S = 1/2) ground spin state, and this is true at room temperature as well, as shown by EPR (Figure S16) and magnetic susceptibility measurements.19 The simulations of the X- and Q-band EPR spectra give a roughly axial g = [2.062, 2.045, 2.012] with g⊥ > g|| ≈ 2.0, characteristic of an unpaired electron in an orbital of dz2 parentage. This low-spin state is in contrast with other mononuclear iron(III) oxo complexes, which are high spin (sextet ground state, S = 5/2).12,13
Figure 3.
Results of electronic structure calculations for 2, as determined by DFT (B3LYP/def2-TZVP/def2-TZVPP). Hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity. (a) Natural orbital representation for the SOMO, isodensity shown at 0.07; (b) spin density, isodensity shown at 0.01.
The solid-state 57Fe Mössbauer spectrum of 2 reveals an asymmetric doublet at 80 K (Figure 2b; additional Mössbauer spectra are presented in Figures S12–S15) that can be fit by quadrupole lines having different line widths, isomer shift, δ = −0.15 mm s–1 and quadrupole splitting, |ΔEQ| = 1.94 mm s–1. The asymmetry and broadness of the spectrum likely originate from slow relaxation at low temperature, which is often observed in half-integer spin (Kramers) complexes. The 57Fe Mössbauer spectral parameters of 2 are distinct from those of mononuclear high-spin Fe(III) oxo complexes, namely, [(H3buea)FeO]2– (δ = 0.30 mm s–1; |ΔEQ| = 0.71 mm s–1 at 77 K12) and [N(afaCy)3FeO]+ (two species observed in the solid state, δ = 0.31 mm s–1; ΔEQ = −1.1 mm s–1 and δ = 0.31 mm s–1; ΔEQ = −2.1 mm s–1 at 6 K20). The spectral parameters for 2 are also different from the iron(III) oxo site in the tetranuclear complex [LFe3O(PzNHtBu)3FeO]+ (δ = 0.43 mm s–1; |ΔEQ| = 3.04 mm s–1 at 80 K14). However, the Mössbauer parameters of 2 are similar to those reported for the structurally related low-spin (S = 1/2) tris(carbene)borate Fe(III) imido complex PhB(MesIm)3Fe≡NAd (δ = −0.11 mm s–1; ΔEQ = 1.65 mm s–1 at 78 K),21 suggesting a similar electronic structure.
Figure 2.
(a) X-band EPR spectrum (toluene, 12 K). Conditions: microwave frequency, 9.375 GHz; field modulation amplitude 10 G. Fit (red) employs S = 1/2, g = [g1, g2, g3] = [2.062, 2.045, 2.012], line widths (hwhm/Gaussian) 100, 40, 20 MHz; (b) solid-state zero-field 57Fe Mössbauer spectrum at 80 K. Black circles, experiment; red line with δ, −0.149 mm s–1; ΔEQ, 1.94 mm s–1; blue line PhB(AdIm)3FeOH (3) impurity; (c) Q-band pulsed ENDOR (black traces) at g = 2.011 of (top) 11B resonances, centered at the Larmor frequency (∼17 MHz); (bottom) 14N resonances with simulations (blue trace: A3(N1,3,5) = 7.7 MHz, 3P3 = 2.4 MHz; red trace: A3(N2,4,6) = 7.0 MHz, 3P3= 1.5 MHz). Conditions: Frequency, 34.849 GHz; Davies pulse sequence: tπ = 100 ns, τ = 600 ns, tRF = 15 μs, repetition time, 50 ms.
ENDOR spectra22 of 2 show signals from 1H, 11B, and 14N magnetically coupled to the paramagnetic [FeIII=O]+ center (Figures 2c and S19). The pulsed 35 GHz 11B ENDOR23 spectrum at g3 (g||) shows well-resolved hyperfine and quadrupole splitting (Figure 2C, top), and simulation of the field-dependent 11B ENDOR pattern (Figure S20) yields hyperfine and quadrupole tensors: A(11B) = [1.0, 1.6, 3.1] MHz, P(11B) = [−0.11, −0.07, +0.18] MHz. The quadrupole tensor frame is coaxial with the g-tensor frame, with the maximum component directed along g|| = g3. As this component must lie closely along the C3 axis of the trigonally symmetric boron atom, this indicates that g3 also lies along the C3 axis of 2, as is the case for the S = 1/2 iron(V) nitride complex, [PhB(tBuIm)3Fe≡N]+.24 The 35 GHz pulsed ENDOR spectrum collected at g3 further shows 14N hyperfine coupling from two sets of nitrogen atoms, Figure 2c, bottom. Simulation of the field-dependent 14N ENDOR pattern is shown in Figure S21. As supported by DFT computations, the larger coupling is assigned to the three symmetry-equivalent Na and the smaller to the three Nb (Figure S25, Table S4).
DFT calculations reproduce the observed doublet (S = 1/2) ground spin state. Geometry optimization of this state (B3LYP/def2-svp) gives structural parameters in good agreement with those observed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, whereas the optimized structures for the quartet (S = 3/2) and sextet (S = 5/2) states provide significantly longer iron–oxygen and iron–carbon bond distances (Table S1). The electronic structure of the doublet state was determined from a single-point calculation at a higher level of theory (B3LYP/def2-TZVP/def2-TZVPP), revealing significant Fe–O multiple bond character, as inferred from the structural and vibrational data (see above). The singly occupied molecular orbital (SOMO) is the σ* antibonding combination of an iron-based orbital of 3dz2/4pz parentage (z along the 3-fold symmetry axis) and the oxygen 2pz orbital (Figure 3a), which partially offsets bonding by the filled Fe–O σ orbital (SOMO-2, Figure S23). Strong π bonding is provided by two doubly-occupied orbitals that are largely the perpendicular π-bonding combinations of Fe 3dxz/3dyz and O 2px/2py (SOMO-2 and SOMO-3), whereas the antibonding combinations are unoccupied (SOMO+1 and SOMO+2). This iron–oxygen multiple bond character is supported by the results of a natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis, which provides an Fe–O bond order of 2.5, decreased from a triple-bond value of 3 by the odd electron in the antibonding SOMO (Wiberg bond index 1.50). The computations further indicate that the bond is polarized toward the oxygen atom and show that the majority of the spin density is located on iron (Löwdin spin density 0.813) but with a non-negligible amount on the oxo ligand (Löwdin spin density 0.151), as shown in Figure 3b. The computations give hyperfine couplings/spin densities of the carbene ligand atoms consistent with experiment (Table S4). A similar spin delocalization is observed for S = 1/2 Fe(V) oxo complexes, but with the unpaired electron housed in an Fe–O π* orbital.25
Although the oxo ligand 2 is buried in the pocket created by the admantyl groups, it is nonetheless accessible along the trigonal axis (Figure 1c). Notably, 2 extracts an H atom from toluene, in so doing forming both the high-spin (S = 2) iron(II) hydroxide complex PhB(AdIm)3FeOH (3), and the high-spin Fe(II) benzoxy complex PhB(AdIm)3Fe-OCH2Ph (4), with the two complexes formed in the ratio 3:4 (1:0.65) (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Reaction of 2 with Toluene to Give 3 and 4.
The structure of 3 contains the same iron coordination environment as in 2 (Figure 4a). The Fe(II)–O (1.876(6) Å) and Fe–C bonds (2.09(1)–2.112(9) Å) of 3 are longer than the respective distances in 2 but are similar to those observed in other high-spin Fe(II) tris(carbene)borate complexes.17,26 The hydroxide ligand proton was located in the Fourier difference map and confirmed by a sharp infrared band at 3669 cm–1 that is assigned to the O–H stretch. The complex has been characterized by other spectroscopic methods, all of which are compatible with the structural formulation (see Supporting Information).
Figure 4.
X-ray crystal structures of (a) 3; and (b) 4. Thermal ellipsoids shown at 50% probability; hydrogen atoms are omitted, tris(carbene)borate ligands are shown as lines, carbon, iron, nitrogen, and oxygen atoms are shown as black, orange, blue, and red ellipsoids, respectively.
Complex 4 has also been characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 4b). It is likely formed by a “non-rebound” mechanism in which the benzyl radical product from the reaction of 2 with toluene is trapped by an additional equivalent of 2.27 No kinetic isotope effect is observed for the rate of reactions of 2 with toluene and toluene-d8.
The reactivity of 2 toward toluene is consistent with the computed O–H BDFE for hydroxide complex 3. Specifically, the gas phase BDFEOH = 82 kcal/mol, suggesting thermoneutral hydrogen atom transfer from toluene (gas phase BDFECH = 81.6 kcal/mol) to 2.28,29 The iron oxo complex 2 has a significantly greater driving force for HAT than does [(H3buea)FeO]2– (BDFEOH = 64 kcal/mol for [(H3buea)FeOH]2–),29,30 consistent with the hypothesis that the reactivity of the oxo ligand is attenuated by second-coordination sphere hydrogen-bond donors.
Uniquely for a molecular iron complex in any oxidation state, 2 also facilitates hydrocarbon dehydrogenation, a reaction carried out by an [FeIV=O]2+ intermediate in some iron(II) and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases.16 Specifically, 2 reacts with equimolar ethylbenzene to provide the hydroxide complex 3 along with 0.5 equiv of styrene (Scheme 3), which was characterized by 1H NMR spectroscopy and GC/MS. Complex 2 can also carry out two-electron oxygen atom transfer chemistry, as evidenced by its ability to catalytically oxidize PPh2Me to the phosphine oxide, O=PPh2Me; however, oxygen atom transfer from 2 to styrene to form styrene oxide is not observed.
Scheme 3. Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene by 2.
In conclusion, the extremely bulky tris(carbene)borate ligand supports an isolable [FeIII=O]+ fragment without the presence of stabilizing, but deactivating, hydrogen-bond donors, in contrast to previously characterized complexes. This unmasks the inherent reactivity of this fragment, which is demonstrated by its distinctive ability to oxidize hydrocarbons.
Acknowledgments
We thank Prof. Liang Deng and Yiming Fan (SIOC) for an initial sample of iron starting material. Funding from the NSF is gratefully acknowledged by J.A.V.-M. and J.M.S. (CHE-1900020) and by B.M.H. (MCB-1908587). This material is also based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award Number DE-SC0019342 (to B.M.H.). Support for the acquisition of the Bruker Venture D8 diffractometer through the Major Scientific Research Equipment Fund from the President of Indiana University and the Office of the Vice President for Research is gratefully acknowledged. NSF’s ChemMatCARS Sector 15 is supported by the NSF Divisions of Chemistry (CHE) and Materials Research (DMR), under Grant Number CHE-1834750. Use of the Advanced Photon Source, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory, was supported by DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00890.
Accession Codes
CCDC 2094972–2094974 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Notes
Computationally optimized structures as well as raw Mössbauer and EPR data have been deposited at IU Data CORE and are freely available (DOI: 10.5967/66dp-0171).
Published ASAP on September 23, 2021; Figure 1 revised September 24, 2021 to correct production error.
Supplementary Material
References
- Costas M.; Mehn M. P.; Jensen M. P.; Que L. Dioxygen Activation at Mononuclear Nonheme Iron Active Sites: Enzymes, Models, and Intermediates. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 939–986. 10.1021/cr020628n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bollinger J. M. Jr.; Krebs C. Stalking intermediates in oxygen activation by iron enzymes: motivation and method. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 100, 586–605. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2006.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang X.; Groves J. T. Beyond Ferryl-Mediated Hydroxylation: 40 Years of the Rebound Mechanism and C-H Activation. JBIC, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 22, 185–207. 10.1007/s00775-016-1414-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Engelmann X.; Monte-Perez I.; Ray K. Oxidation Reactions with Bioinspired Mononuclear Non-Heme Metal-Oxo Complexes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7632–49. 10.1002/anie.201600507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abu-Omar M. M.; Loaiza A.; Hontzeas N. Reaction Mechanisms of Mononuclear Non-Heme Iron Oxygenases. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2227–2252. 10.1021/cr040653o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Company A.; Lloret-Fillol J.; Costas M.. Small Molecule Models for Nonporphyrinic Iron and Manganese Oxygenases. In Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II; Elsevier, 2013; pp 487–564. [Google Scholar]
- Klein J. E. M. N.; Que L.. Biomimetic High-Valent Mononuclear Nonheme Iron-Oxo Chemistry. In Encyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry; Wiley, 2016; pp 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Fukuzumi S.; Kotani H.; Lee Y.-M.; Nam W. Sequential Electron-Transfer and Proton-Transfer Pathways in Hydride-Transfer Reactions from Dihydronicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Analogues to Non-heme Oxoiron(IV) Complexes and p-Chloranil. Detection of Radical Cations of NADH Analogues in Acid-Promoted Hydride-Transfer Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15134–15142. 10.1021/ja804969k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nehru K.; Seo M. S.; Kim J.; Nam W. Oxidative N-Dealkylation Reactions by Oxoiron(IV) Complexes of Nonheme and Heme Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 293–298. 10.1021/ic0614014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andris E.; Navratil R.; Jasik J.; Puri M.; Costas M.; Que L. Jr.; Roithova J. Trapping Iron(III)-Oxo Species at the Boundary of the ″Oxo Wall″: Insights into the Nature of the Fe(III)-O Bond. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 14391–14400. 10.1021/jacs.8b08950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith J. M.; Mayberry D. E.; Margarit C. G.; Sutter J.; Wang H.; Meyer K.; Bontchev R. P. N-O Bond Homolysis of an Iron(II) TEMPO Complex Yields an Iron(III) Oxo Intermediate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6516–9. 10.1021/ja211882e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacBeth C. E.; Golombek A. P.; Jr V. G. Y.; Yang C.; Kuczera K.; Hendrich M. P.; Borovik A. S. O2 Activation by Nonheme Iron Complexes: A Monomeric Fe(III)–Oxo Complex Derived From O2. Science 2000, 289, 938–941. 10.1126/science.289.5481.938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matson E. M.; Park Y. J.; Fout A. R. Facile Nitrite Reduction in a Non-Heme Iron System: Formation of an Iron(III)-Oxo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 17398–401. 10.1021/ja510615p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reed C. J.; Agapie T. A Terminal Fe(III)-Oxo in a Tetranuclear Cluster: Effects of Distal Metal Centers on Structure and Reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 9479–9484. 10.1021/jacs.9b03157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang W.-c.; Liu P.; Guo Y. Mechanistic Elucidation of Two Catalytically Versatile Iron(II)- and α-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Enzymes: Cases Beyond Hydroxylation. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2018, 38, 127–165. 10.1080/02603594.2018.1509856. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez S.; Hausinger R. P. Catalytic Mechanisms of Fe(II)- and 2-Oxoglutarate-dependent Oxygenases. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 20702–20711. 10.1074/jbc.R115.648691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan Y.; Cheng J.; Gao Y.; Shi M.; Deng L. Iron Dinitrogen Complexes Supported by Tris(NHC)borate Ligand: Synthesis, Characterization, and Reactivity Study. Huaxue Xuebao 2018, 76, 445–452. 10.6023/A18030095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Larson V. A.; Battistella B.; Ray K.; Lehnert N.; Nam W. Iron and Manganese Oxo Complexes, Oxo Wall and Beyond. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020, 4, 404–419. 10.1038/s41570-020-0197-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGarvey B. E. Survey of Ligand Field Parameters of Strong Field d5 Complexes Obtained from the g Matrix. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 170, 75–92. 10.1016/S0010-8545(97)00073-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gordon Z.; Miller T. J.; Leahy C. A.; Matson E. M.; Burgess M.; Drummond M. J.; Popescu C. V.; Smith C. M.; Lord R. L.; Rodriguez-Lopez J.; Fout A. R. Characterization of Terminal Iron(III)-Oxo and Iron(III)-Hydroxo Complexes Derived from O2 Activation. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 15801–15811. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scepaniak J. J.; Harris T. D.; Vogel C. S.; Sutter J.; Meyer K.; Smith J. M. Spin Crossover in a Four-coordinate Iron(II) Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3824–7. 10.1021/ja2003473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Telser J.Electron-Nuclear Double Resonance (ENDOR) Spectroscopy. In Applications of Physical Methods to Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry; Scott R. A., Lukehart C. M., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Schweiger A.; Jeschke G.. Principles of Pulse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Cutsail G. E. III; Stein B. W.; Subedi D.; Smith J. M.; Kirk M. L.; Hoffman B. M. EPR, ENDOR, and Electronic Structure Studies of the Jahn–Teller Distortion in an FeV Nitride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 12323–12336. 10.1021/ja505403j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim Y.; Kim J.; Nguyen L. K.; Lee Y.-M.; Nam W.; Kim S. H. EPR Spectroscopy Elucidates the Electronic Structure of [FeV(O)(TAML)] Complexes. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 3775–3783. 10.1039/D1QI00522G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lin H.-J.; Siretanu D.; Dickie D. A.; Subedi D.; Scepaniak J. J.; Mitcov D.; Clérac R.; Smith J. M. Steric and Electronic Control of the Spin State in Three-Fold Symmetric, Four-Coordinate Iron(II) Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 13326–13332. 10.1021/ja506425a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cho K. B.; Wu X.; Lee Y. M.; Kwon Y. H.; Shaik S.; Nam W. Evidence for an Alternative to the Oxygen Rebound Mechanism in C-H Bond Activation by Non-Heme Fe(IV)O Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 20222–5. 10.1021/ja308290r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellison G. B.; Davico G. E.; Bierbaum V. M.; DePuy C. H. Thermochemistry of the Benzyl and Allyl Radicals and Ions. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1996, 156, 109–131. 10.1016/S0168-1176(96)04383-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Warren J. J.; Tronic T. A.; Mayer J. M. Thermochemistry of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reagents and its Implications. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6961–7001. 10.1021/cr100085k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calculated according to the procedure in ref (29) using data from; Gupta R.; Borovik A. S. Monomeric MnIII/II and FeIII/II Complexes with Terminal Hydroxo and Oxo Ligands: Probing Reactivity via O–H Bond Dissociation Energies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13234–13242. 10.1021/ja030149l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.