Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Cardiology and Therapy logoLink to Cardiology and Therapy
. 2021 Jul 2;10(2):501–514. doi: 10.1007/s40119-021-00230-w

Cardiac Complications in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of BNP and N-Terminal Pro-BNP

Mahboobeh Sheikh 1, Pouya Ostadrahimi 2,✉, Morteza Salarzaei 2, Fateme Parooie 2
PMCID: PMC8555044  PMID: 34213737

Abstract

Introduction

Serum brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels may be involved in detecting the breakdown of defense mechanisms in pregnant women. BNP and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) levels can be used in emergency settings as a biomarker to rule out or confirm cardiac complications. The present study was conducted as an attempt to evaluate the performance of BNP and NT-proBNP as diagnostic tools for cardiac complications, including heart failure and pre-eclampsia, in pregnant and recently-delivered women.

Methods

This meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. To extract the data, articles meeting the inclusion criteria were directly reviewed by two of the authors. Disputes were resolved through discussion with all authors before data mining. In cases of unresolved disagreement, a third reviewer was consulted to achieve consensus. A quantitative analysis of the total bias of publications was performed using Stata software version 14.0, using funnel plots and Deek’s test.

Results

Overall, 13 unique studies were included in this review. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for diagnosing cardiac complications in pregnant women when BNP level was ≤ 100 ng/L, were determined to be 95, 62, 71 and 91%, respectively. The corresponding measures when the BNP levels were 100–500 ng/L were calculated to be 98, 92, 97 and 92%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for diagnosing cardiac complications in pregnant women using NT-proBNP were 78, 74, 20.5 and 97%, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that both BNP and NT-proBNP levels can be used as diagnostic tools among pregnant and newly-delivered women to diagnose cardiac complications, including heart failure and pre-eclampsia. While BNP showed a relatively better diagnostic accuracy compared to NT-proBNP, it must be noted that the number of studies evaluating NT-proBNP included in this meta-analysis was low and the studies were inconsistent in terms of cutoff value. Further studies are required to confirm the prospective use of BNP and NT-pro BNP in assessing common symptoms that indicate cardiac complications during labor. Moreover, the clinical use of the NT-proBNP test in this field requires further study.

Keywords: Brain-type natriuretic peptide, N-terminal pro-BNP, Pregnancy, Cardiac complications

Key Summary Points

Serum brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) levels can be used as diagnostic tools to diagnose cardiac complications in pregnant and newly-delivered women.
There is a significant correlation between high levels of NT-proBNP and the devlopment of pre-eclampsia.
BNP levels of 100–500 ng/L, showed a positive and negative predictive value of 92 and 97% for diagnosing cardiac complications in pregnancy.
The high sensitivity of BNP (98%) makes it a good diagnostic method for screening purposes.
Open in a new tab

Digital Features

This article is published with digital features, including a summary slide, to facilitate understanding of the article. To view digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14769672

Introduction

A number of hemodynamic alterations are associated with pregnancy, including increases in cardiac output, plasma volume and heart rate. Excessive volume loading is often regarded as a major pathogenic mechanism predisposing harmful maternal events during pregnancy. In response to volume overload, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) levels increase in non-pregnant women; consequently, increased BNP and NT-proBNP levels can be used as biomarkers to predict the risk of cardiovascular complications [1–6]. However, despite the identification of clinical predictors of cardiac complications during pregnancy and the use of diagnostic tools such as echocardiography [7, 8], current risk stratification is insufficient as it does not include evaluation of maternal heart adequacy and its adaptation during pregnancy. Moreover, as the signs and symptoms of pregnancy can highly mimic the signs of cardiac decompensation, the clinical diagnosis of cardiac disease is complicated still further in pregnant patients; as such, additional tools, such as serum BNP levels, may be useful diagnostic markers to detect the breakdown of defense mechanisms. BNP is a neurohormone that is secreted when ventricular volume and pressure increase [9]. It has a very high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cardiac disease that are not influenced by subjective factors. In recent years, studies on the manifestation and role of BNP in heart disease have consistently indicated that it is heavily featured in the appraisals of heart failure [10]. It has been reported that BNP and NT-proBNP levels can be used in emergency settings as a biomarker to rule out or confirm heart failure [12, 13]. However, due to the large number of cardiovascular changes in pregnancy that can affect BNP levels, the use of BNP as a diagnostic marker of heart failure is currently almost entirely limited to the non-pregnant population despite that fact that the level of BNP tends to remain stable throughout all pregnancy trimesters and the postpartum period (4–6 weeks), with the levels of BNP slightly higher in pregnant women and women who have recently delivered (median values ranging from 15.5 to 19 pg/mL have been reported) [14, 15] compared to non-pregnant women (median values of 10 pg/mL reported) [16, 17]. Increases in BNP and NT-proBNP levels during pregnancy are epecially evident in the setting of pre-eclampsia, with median BNP levels in the range of 21.1–101 pg/mL [11, 15], with a more recent report of 37.1 pg/mL [17]. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to assess the performance of BNP and NT-proBNP as diagnostic tools for cardiac complications, including heart failure and pre-eclampsia, in pregnant and recently-delivered women.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [18, 19]. This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Search Strategy

Different databases, including the Web of Science, PubMed, Medline and ProQuest databases, were searched for relevant articles using the following keywords: “pregnancy,” “pre-eclampsia,” “heart failure,” “heart disease” or “congenital heart disease,” “cardiac complications,” “BNP” or “B-type natriuretic peptide” or “NT-proBNP”. Reference lists of the articles identified to be of interest were also manually searched.

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Women who were managed by a team of obstetricians and cardiologists and who had valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, left ventricular systolic disorder (LVSD) or pulmonary hypertension were eligible for inclusion in this study. Only full-text articles written in English were included. The following studies/articles were excluded: review articles, letters, case studies, expert opinions and conference papers. Also excluded were articles reporting research on animals other than humans and studies including patients with kidney disease, serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL, underlying lung disease, twin pregnancies and severe anemia.

Extraction of Data

To avoid the inclusion of duplicate data, i.e. studies on the same research population in the same research center, only the largest of the duplicate studies with the longest follow-up time was considered. Also, for studies on different patients at the same research center, only one study was considered. To extract the data, articles meeting the aforementioned criteria were directly reviewed by two of the authors, with disagreement resolved by discussion. If the diagreement remained unresolved, consensus was achieved by consultation with a third author. Minimum, maximum and median measures were applied and the mean and standard deviations (SD) were obtained. Additional data was carefully extracted using a standardized data collection form.

Publication Bias

A quantitative analysis on total bias was performed using Stata version 14.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) to draw funnel plots and perform Deek’s test. An asymmetric distribution of data points in the funnel diagram, together with a significance value of p < 0.05, indicated the existence of a potential publication bias [20].

Heterogeneity

The Chi-square (χ2) test was used to evaluate the heterogeneity in calculating the overall specificity and sensitivity. In addition, Cochran's Q test was used to investigate heterogeneity in diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) pooling. When the results of these qualitative tests revealed a p value < 0.05, we realized that there was a statistically significant heterogeneity. The I2 test was also performed in each pooled analysis to quantitatively estimate the ratio of total changes throughout the study that could be attributed to heterogeneity versus chance. The value of I2, expressed as a value in the range between 0 and 100%, was > 50%, indicating significant heterogeneity. The presence of a threshold effect is exhibited in the form of a curvilinear shape in summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves.

Results

Our search process identified 529 articles, of which 460 were excluded after review of the unrelated abstract and title. The full text of 69 articles was assessed, resulting in the exclusion of another 50 articles for the following reasons: studies with no full text available (n = 19); studies evaluating other populations (n = 8); reviews (n = 12); cross-review for included references; letter to editors (n = 3); and studies with no reported quality estimate [8] (Fig. 1). Ultimately, 13 unique studies were included in this review. In two of the included studies, data (111 participants) were reported at the threshold of ≤ 100 ng/L, in two other studies (128 participants), the threshold was determined to be 100–500 ng/L and in one study (60 participants) data were reported at the threshold of ≥ 500 ng/L (Table 1). Three studies evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of NT-proBNP in diagnosing cardiac complications in pregnancy and six studies evaluated the association between NT-proBNP levels and development of pre-eclampsia. One study evaluated both cardiac complications and pre-eclampsia.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

PRISMA flow diagram

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies

First author Publication year Study period No. of patients Age (in years) of patients (± SD) Design Prevalence Reference standard Country
Malhame [37] 2019 2007–2018 60 32 ± 6.8 Retrospective 39 (65%) Elevated BNP level (< 100 pg/mL) USA
Tanous [48] 2010 2006–2018 78 31 ± 5 Prospective 66 (84%) Elevated BNP level (> 100 pg/mL) Canada
KAN [51] 2019 2016–2017 60 27.15 ± 2.2 Prospective –  ≥ 500 ng/L China
Singh [52] 2018 – 50 26.3 ± 3.1 Prospective 38( 76%) 100–500 ng/L India
Umazume [53] 2018 2014–2017 51 34.4 ± 5.1 Prospective – Elevated BNP level (< 100 pg/mL) Japan
Open in a new tab

SD Standard deviation

Diagnostic Accuracy of BNP and NT-proBNP

The overall sensitivity and specificity for BNP and NT-proBNP were 94 versus 78% and 75 versus 74%, respectively. The corresponding rates for positive and negative predictive values were 80 versus 20.5% and 93 versus 97%, respectively. In addition, the area under the curve for BNP and NT-proBNP was 0.96 and 83.5, respectively (Figs. 2, 3, 4) (Table 2). The high positive likelihood ratio (LR+; 3.95) and low rate of the negative LR (LR−; 0.091) of BNP was found to be associated with a lower the rate of misdiagnosis and a lower rate of missed diagnosis in the diagnostic test (Fig. 5). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of BNP within the level of  ≤ 100 ng/L were calculated to be 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86–0.99), 0.62 (95% CI 0.48–0.74), 71% and 91%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values of BNP within the threshold of 100–500 ng/L were calculated to be 0.98 (95% CI 0.90–0.99), 0.92 (95% CI 0.83–0.95), 97% and 92%, respectively. Since only one study reported data for BNP at a threshold of ≥ 500 ng/L, this interval could not be analyzed in our meta-analysis; however, the sensitivity was more likely to decrease as the threshold increased (Table 3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Sensitivity (a) and specificity (b) of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in diagnosing cardiac complications in pregnancy

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Sensitivity (a) and specificity (b) of NT-proBNP in diagnosing cardiac complications in pregnancy

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Summary receiver (SROC) curve for B-Type natriuretic peptide in diagnosing Cardiac Complications in pregnancy (a). Fagan’s nomogram for the calculation of post-test probabilities. A pre-test probability of 50% for diagnostic tool was fixed, which was estimated by the number of symptomatic cases in selected studies. BNP had a post-test probability of 69.4% (b). Diagnostic odds ratio for B- natriuretic peptide in diagnosing Cardiac Complications in pregnancy (C)

Table 2.

Meta-analysis of accuracy of N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide for diagnosing cardiac complications in pregnancy

Author/year Positive predictive value (%) Negative predictive value (%) Specificity (%) Sensitivity (%) Mean—control (pg/mL) Mean NT level—case (pg/mL) Time of evaluation Cutoff point (pg/mL) Sample size (n) Prevalence of complication (%)
Kampman/2014 [49] 18.3 96.9 61.8 81.3 100 173 20 weeks 128 169 10.3
Álvarez-Fernández/2016 [44] N/A N/A 76 84 N/A N/A N/A 219 340 N/A
Siegmund/2021 [50] 23.5 97.2 89.1 57.1 95 301 12 week 235 ng/mL 126 5.6
0verall 20.5 97 74 78 97.5 237 – – – 7.8
Open in a new tab

N/A Not available

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Negative LR (a) and positive LR (b) of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in diagnosing cardiac complications in pregnancy

Table 3.

Meta-analysis of accuracy of brain-type natriuretic peptide in diagnosing cardiac complications in pregnancy

Parameter All (95% CI)  cutoff ≤ 100 ng/L (95% CI) cutoff 100–500 ng/L (95% CI)  ≥ 500 ng/L (95% CI) Prospective (95% CI)
Sensitivity (95% CI) 94% (0.91–0.97) 95% (0.86–0.99) 92% (0.83–0.95) 88% (0.77–0.95) 94% (0.89–0.96)
Specificity (95% CI) 75% (0.69–0.80) 62% (0.48–0.74) 98% (0.90–0.99) 63% (0.50–0.76) 80% (0.74–0.850
PLR (95% CI) 3.95 (1.94–8.06) 2.47 (1.78–3.43) 34.0 (8.65–133.63) 2.40 (1.70–3.40) 5.63 (1.96–16.17)
NLR (95% CI) 0.09 1(0.036–0.23) 0.081 (0.026–0.249) 0.08 (0.03–133.63) 0.18 (0.08–0.37) 8% (0.02–0.28)
DOR (95% CI) 71.44 (10.46–487.5) 30.56 (8.56–109.09) 408.00 (79.59–2091.3) 13.07 (5.07–33.71) 120.21 (7.26–1990)
PPV 80% 71% 97% 71% 83%
NPV 93% 92% 92% 84% 93%
Accuracy 85% 78.3% 94% 76% 87%
AUC-SROC 0.9842 0.9845 0.9867 0.9819 0.9854
I2 76.9% 84.1% 85.6% 94% 81%
Open in a new tab

AUC-SROC Area under the curve-summary receiver operating characteristic curve, CI confidence interval, DOR diagnostic odds ratio, NLR negative likelihood ratio, NPV negative predictive value, PLR positivie likelihood ratio, PPV positive predictive value

The Overall Mean NT-proBNP Levels

The overall mean NT-proBNP value was calculated to be 272.6 among women who developed pre-eclamsia compared to 72.3 among healthy pregnant women (Table 4). All included studies reported a significant correlation between high levels of NT-proBNP and the development of pre-eclampsia.

Table 4.

Meta-analysis of mean levels of N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide in association with pre-eclampsia

First author/year of publication Sample size (n) Mean—case (pg/mL) Mean—control (pg/mL)
Hafiz/2021 [42] 60 673.50 ± 486.86 262.75 ± 457.04
Moghbeli/2010 [43] 63 197 58
Fernández/2016 [44] 340 169 34
Junus/2014 [45] 74 365 48
Giannubilo/2017 [46] 98 121.2 ± 26.3 42.5 ± 11.4
Bakacak/2015 [34] 76 110 37
Overal meanl – 272.6 80.3
Open in a new tab

Values are presented as the mean (± SD where available)

Diagnostic Accuracy of BNP According to Country

The best overall sensitivity of BNP for diagnosing cardiac complications during pregnancy was reported by Canadian authors (100%), while the least sensitivity was reported in a study from China (88%). Specificity was the best in an Indian study (92%). However, an American study reported a specificity of 62% (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

Pooled sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in diagnosing cardiac complications in pregnancy

Discussion

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of different BNP levels in the evaluation of pregnant and recently-delivered women with suspected cardiac failure. Women with cardiac disorders have higher BNP levels during their pregnancy compared to their non-pregnant counterparts, which may indicate an incomplete adaptation to the hemodynamic load of pregnancy. Pregnancy and physical exercise have a number of common characteristics in terms of hemodynamic alterations. Higher levels of BNP in non-pregnant women with underlying cardiac disease can be associated with some forms of latent ventricular dysfunction. However, this increase might only occur during physical exercise [21, 22], with the higher levels of BNP possibly indicative of subclinical disorders that present only with physical stress [23, 24]. This increase is paralleled by the increase in the mass of the left ventricular (LV) wall and the dimensions of the LV chamber [25, 26]. However, healthy women can generally compensate for the increased volume that occurs during pregnancy and have stable levels of BNP during their pregnancy [27, 28]. Increased levels of BNP during pregnancy, a physiological state that is associated with volume overload and subsequent ventricular dilatation, can to some extent explain the mechanism which causes clinical deterioration. There is some evidence suggesting that pregnancy has a detrimental effect on the normal course of the cardiac disorder in women with LV systolic function [29] and may subsequently affect the performance of ventricles [30, 31]. Five related studies were included in this meta-analysis. Although these results were not consistent across all of the pooled results, the diagnostic performance of BNP in diagnosing cardiac complications showed a pooled sensitivity of 94% (95% CI of 0.91–0.97) and a pooled specificity of 75% (95% CI 0.69–0.80), as well as an AUC (± SD) value of 0.7991 ± 0.0164. The sensitivity of BNP in detecting heart failure in the general population has been reported to be about 0.70, indicating the potential capacity of BNP to be used to diagnose heart failure [32].

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis are comparable to those of other studies on non-pregnant populations [33, 34]. In the landmark study “Breathing Not Properly”, which evaluated BNP in patients presenting with acute dyspnea, the authors stated that BNP levels at a cutoff value of 100 pg/mL had a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI of 88–92) and an accuracy of 83% [33]. Therefore, when BNP was employed in the obstetric population, it was at least at the same levels of sensitivity and accuracy as in the non-pregnant population. Although the baseline levels of BNP were higher among pregnant and newly-delivered women [23, 35, 36], the cutoff values of BNP appeared to be relatively similar to those used in the non-pregnant population [33]. Thus, measuring the level of BNP might improve decision-making in terms of best management of the patient. Clinicians can test the level of BNP to detect the physiological signs of pregnancy along with early signs of cardiac failure. Assuming a 94% sensitivity and a 0.091 negative LR, a negative BNP test can be used to help prevent heart failure. Malhamé et al. argued that, assuming a positive LR of > 2 for BNP, a positive test may indicate the need for additional cardiac imaging [37]. The positive LR in this meta-analysis was calculated to be 3.95. The safest cutoff value used, in light of the findings of Malhamé et al., was 78 pg/mL, which can maximize sensitivity at the cost of lowering specificity.

Our results indicate a partially better sensitivity and specificity for BNP in comparison with NT-proBNP, which is consistent with the results reported by Hill et al. who compared the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers for the diagnosis of heart failure in the emergency department [37]. Some of the included studies indicated that when interpreting BNP levels in patients with pre-eclampsia, it is important to consider that BNP levels can be increased by hypertension, even if there are no signs of cardiac failure [23, 34, 39, 40]. However, it has been suggested that the increase in BNP level is clinically dependent on the degree of clinical and non-clinically detectable ventricular abnormalities and the inherited state of pre-eclampsia [34, 38]. All of our included studies which evaluated NT-proBNP levels reported a significant correlation between the levels of this biomarker and the development of pre-eclampsia [42–47].

Tanous et al. found levels of BNP indicative of cardiac failure in 38% of pregnant women with underlying cardiac conditions [48]. These authors also reported that many of these women presented no signs of cardiac decompensation. Despite being inconclusive, this reaction might be a sign of limited cardiac reserve. In addition, the levels of BNP were higher in pregnant patients with underlying cardiac disease than the healthy women. However, there was no significant difference between these levels in patients with and without clinical events [48]. These results indicate that these women, especially those who have elevated levels of BNP during their pregnancy, should maintain post-pregnancy care. Early detection of deterioration in such conditions, before any acute events occur, is of great importance in patients with underlying cardiac conditions, since both the mother and fetus will be endangered by acute conditions and the options for treating the patient can be limited due to pregnancy status. As early diagnosis is highly critical in such cases, studies have focused on risk stratification through prenatal and clinical echocardiographic variables [41, 42]. However, few studies have evaluated the application of biomarkers or other measurements capable of determining the adaptability of the heart with the hemodynamic load of pregnancy.

There are several limitations to our study which need to be addressed. First, as there were an insufficient number of studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of both BNP and NT-pro BNP in the same population, we had to include different studies with different samples, which could cause heterogenicity. Secondly, only three studies evaluated NT-proBNP, and each of these considered a different cutoff value which affected the accuracy of our pooled measurements. Thirdly, the studies investigating pre-eclampsia did not provide any data on the diagnostic accuracy of NT-proBNP and only reported the mean values.

Conclusion

In summary, the results of our study suggest that BNP as well as NT-proBNP levels can be used as a diagnostic tool among pregnant and newly-delivered women to diagnose cardiac complications, including heart failure and pre-eclampsia. BNP showed a relatively better diagnostc accuracy than NT-proBNP, but it should be considered that the number of included studies evaluating NT-pro-BNP was low and the studies were inconsistent in terms of cutoff value. Further studies are required to confirm the prospective use of BNP and NT-proBNP for assessing common symptoms that indicate cardiac complications during labor. Moreover, the clinical use of the NT-proBNP test in this field requires further study.

Acknowledgements

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Disclosures

Mahboobeh Sheikh, Pouya Ostadrahimi, Morteza Salarzaei and Fateme Parooie have nothing to disclose.

Funding

No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Author Contributions

MSH and POR participated in the conception and design of the study, library searches and assembling relevant literature, critical review of the paper, supervising writing of the paper and database management. MS and FP participated in data collection, library searches and assembling relevant literature, writing the paper and critical review of the paper.

References

  • 1.Berger R, Huelsman M, Strecker K, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide predicts sudden death in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2002;105:2392–2397. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000016642.15031.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.de Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Bentley JH, et al. The prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1014–1021. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wazni OM, Martin DO, Marrouche NF, et al. Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels predict postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2004;110:124–127. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134481.24511.BC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Leuchte HH, Holzapfel M, Baumgartner RA, Neurohr C, Vogeser M, Behr J. Characterization of brain natriuretic peptide in long-term follow-up of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 2005;128:2368–2374. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sacher F, Corcuff J-B, Schraub P, et al. Chronic atrial fibrillation ablation impact on endocrine and mechanical cardiac functions. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1290–1295. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bernus A, Wagner BD, Accurso F, Doran A, Kaess H, Ivy DD. Brain natriuretic peptide levels in managing pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 2009;135:745–751. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Siu SC, Sermer M, Colman JM, et al. Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation. 2001;104:515–521. doi: 10.1161/hc3001.093437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khairy P, Ouyang DW, Fernandes SM, Lee-Parritz A, Economy KE, Landzberg MJ. Pregnancy outcomes in women with congenital heart disease. Circulation. 2006;113:517–524. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.589655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Adams KF, Jr, Giblin EM, Pearce N, Patterson JH. Integrating new pharmacologic agents into heart failure care: Role of heart failure practice guidelines in meeting this challenge. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37:645–656. doi: 10.1002/phar.1934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14: 803–69 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Vaught AJ, Kovell LC, Szymanski LM, et al. Acute cardiac effects of severe pre-eclampsia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chow SL, Maisel AS, Anand I, et al. Role of biomarkers for the prevention, assessment, and management of heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e1054–e1091. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Maisel AS, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM, et al. Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:161–167. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hameed AB, Chan K, Ghamsary M, Elkayam U. Longitudinal changes in the B-type natriuretic peptide levels in normal pregnancy and postpartum. Clin Cardiol. 2009;32:E60–E62. doi: 10.1002/clc.20391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Resnik JL, Hong C, Resnik R, et al. Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in normal and preeclamptic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:450–454. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mayama M, Yoshihara M, Uno K, et al. Factors influencing brain natriuretic peptide levels in healthy pregnant women. Int J Cardiol. 2017;228:749–753. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Borghi C, Esposti DD, Immordino V, et al. Relationship of systemic hemodynamics, left ventricular structure and function, and plasma natriuretic pep- tide concentrations during pregnancy complicated by pre eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:140–147. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(00)24854-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8:336–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:882–893. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Borghi C, Esposti DD, Immordino V, et al. Relationship of systemic hemodynamics, left ventricular structure and function, and plasma natriuretic peptide concentrations during pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:140–147. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(00)24854-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Itoh H, Sagawa N, Mori T, Mukoyama M, Nakao K, Imura H. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide level in pregnant women with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:71–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Resnik JL, Hong C, Resnik R, et al. Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in normal and preeclamptic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:450–454. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Grunewald C, Nisell H, Carlstrom K, Kublickas M, Randmaa I, Nylund L. Acute volume expansion in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Effects on plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) concentrations and feto- maternal circulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994;73:294–9. doi: 10.3109/00016349409015766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ozcan T, Senoz S, Sahin N, Direm B, Gokmen O. Change in atrial natriuretic peptide concentration after acute plasma volume expansion in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995;39:229–233. doi: 10.1159/000292416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grewal J, Siu SC, Ross H, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Maisel AS, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM, et al. Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic pep- tide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:161–167. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Itoh H, Sagawa N, Mori T, Mukoyama M, Nakao K, Imura H. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide level in pregnant women with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:71–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Uebing A, Arvanitis P, Li W, et al. Effect of pregnancy on clinical status and ventricular function in women with heart disease. Int J Cardiol. 2010;139:50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guedes A, Mercier LA, Leduc L, Berube L, Marcotte F, Dore A. Impact of pregnancy on the systemic right ventricle after aMustard operation for transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:433–437. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Siu SC, Sermer M, Colman JM, et al. Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation. 2001;104:515–521. doi: 10.1161/hc3001.093437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ishii H, Harada K, Toyono M, Tamura M, Takada G. Usefulness of exercise-induced changes in plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide in predicting right ventricular contractile reserve after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:1338–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.01.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maisel AS, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM, et al. Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic pep- tide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:161–167. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bakacak M, Serin S, Ercan O, Kostu B, Bakacak Z, Kiran H. Association of serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels with the severity of preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2016;29:2802–2806. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1104663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hameed AB, Chan K, Ghamsary M, Elkayam U. Longitudinal changes in the B-type natriuretic peptide levels in normal pregnancy and postpartum. Clin Cardiol. 2009;32:E60–E62. doi: 10.1002/clc.20391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mayama M, Yoshihara M, Uno K, et al. Factors influencing brain natriuretic peptide levels in healthy pregnant women. Int J Cardiol. 2017;228:749–753. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Malhamé I, Hurlburt H, Larson L, Poppas A, Nau C, Bourjeily G, Mehta N. Sensitivity and specificity of B-type natriuretic peptide in diagnosing heart failure in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(3):440–449. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hill SA, Booth RA, Santaguida PL, Don-Wauchope A, Brown JA, Oremus M, Ali U, Bustamam A, Sohel N, McKelvie R, Balion C. Use of BNP and NT-proBNP for the diagnosis of heart failure in the emergency department: a systematic review of the evidence. Heart Failure Rev. 2014;19(4):421–438. doi: 10.1007/s10741-014-9447-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Prasad CS, Kumar S, Sumathy S, Kunjukutty R, Puthenveettil N, Sen AC, Sivabalakrishnan JB, Kumar RK. Pregnancy and pulmonary arterial hypertension—improving surveillance and outcomes with multidisciplinary care and N terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide trends. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;16:1–7. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1828333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Siu SC, Sermer M, Colman JM, et al. Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation. 2001;104:515–21. doi: 10.1161/hc3001.093437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ishii H, Harada K, Toyono M, Tamura M, Takada G. Usefulness of exercise-induced changes in plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide in predicting right ventricular contractile reserve after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:1338–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.01.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Khairy P, Ouyang DW, Fernandes SM, Lee-Parritz A, Economy KE, Landzberg MJ. Pregnancy outcomes in women with congenital heart disease. Circulation. 2006;113:517–524. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.589655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hafiz A, Dewantiningrum J, Kristanto H, Pramono MB. Serum N-Terminal Pro B-Type Natriuretic Peptide is associated with maternal complication in pregnancy with severe preeclampsia.
  • 44.Moghbeli N, Srinivas SK, Bastek J, Lu Y, Putt ME, Cappola TP, Elovitz MA. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide as a biomarker for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 2010;27(04):313–319. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1241735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Álvarez-Fernández I, Prieto B, Rodríguez V, Ruano Y, Escudero AI, Álvarez FV. N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide and angiogenic biomarkers in the prognosis of adverse outcomes in women with suspected preeclampsia. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;463:150–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Junus K, Wikström AK, Larsson A, Olovsson M. Placental expression of proBNP/NT-proBNP and plasma levels of NT-proBNP in early-and late-onset preeclampsia. Am Jo Hypertens. 2014;27(9):1225–1230. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Giannubilo SR, Pasculli A, Tidu E, Biagini A, Boscarato V, Ciavattini A. Relationship between maternal hemodynamics and plasma natriuretic peptide concentrations during pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. J Perinatol. 2017;37(5):484–487. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tanous D, Siu SC, Mason J, Greutmann M, Wald RM, Parker JD, Sermer M, Colman JM, Silversides CK. B-type natriuretic peptide in pregnant women with heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(15):1247–1253. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kampman MA, Balci A, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide predicts cardiovascular complications in pregnant women with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(11):708–715. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Siegmund AS, Pieper PG, Bouma BJ, Rosenberg FM, Groen H, Bilardo CM, van Veldhuisen DJ, Dickinson MG. Early N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide is associated with cardiac complications and function during pregnancy in congenital heart disease. Netherlands Heart J. 2021;29(5):262–272. doi: 10.1007/s12471-021-01540-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kan C, Cao J, Hou J, Jing X, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Guo Y, Chen X. Correlation of miR-21 and BNP with pregnancy-induced hypertension complicated with heart failure and the diagnostic value. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17(4):3129–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 52.Singh K, Sikka P, Suri V, Prasad R, Khullar M, Vijayvergiya R. Brain natriuretic peptide in pregnant women with heart disease. Obstet Med. 2020;13(1):25–29. doi: 10.1177/1753495X18819351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Umazume T, Yamada T, Yamada S, Ishikawa S, Furuta I, Iwano H, Murai D, Hayashi T, Okada K, Morikawa M, Yamada T. Morphofunctional cardiac changes in pregnant women: associations with biomarkers. Open Heart. 2018;5(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Cardiology and Therapy are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES