ABSTRACT
The study investigated how sprouted-papaya seed meal (SPSM) a total of affected the growth and carcase traits of broilers. Based on a completely randomized design, 390 day-old Lohmann broiler chicks were allotted to CONT (chicks provided with control diet), SEED25 (diet containing 2.5% papaya seed meal), GERM1 (diet containing 1% SPSM), GERM25 (diet containing 2.5% SPSM) and GERM5 (diet containing 5% SPSM). Body weight and feed intake of chickens were weekly recorded from 14 to 36 days of age, while birds (six birds per treatment group; 30 birds in total) were slaughtered at day 36. Feeding SPSM up to 5% did not impair (p > 0.05) broilers’ growth or feed intake. At 5%, SPSM compromised (p < 0.05) feed conversion ratio (FCR) and reduced breast meat proportion. SPSM at 2.5% in diets had no (p > 0.05) detrimental effects, while papaya seed meal at the same proportion lowered (p < 0.05) final body weight, weight gain, and cumulative feed intake. Overall, SPSM may be incorporated in broiler rations up to 2.5% with no harmful effects on growth, feed intake, FCR and carcase traits of broiler chickens.
KEYWORDS: Broiler chickens, growth, carcase, sprouted-papaya seed
1. Introduction
Yellow maize and soybean meal (SBM) are the primary components of broiler rations, serving respectively as energy and protein sources. During the COVID-19 pandemic, broiler breeders are extremely concerned about the dearth of yellow maize and SBM and their expensive price. Due to lock-down in some regions, the supply chain for yellow maize is interrupted, while the importation of SBM is disrupted during the pandemic. This circumstance forces farmers to seek for alternate energy and protein sources in order to ensure the broiler production sustainability. Papaya (Carica papaya L.) seeds represent a waste that is no longer usable. Papaya is one of the most grown tropical crops in the world, with Brazil, India, and Mexico producing the most. On 2016, the global production of papaya fruit was 13.2 metric tons [1]. Given that the seed from ripe papaya accounts for around 16% of the fresh fruit weight [2], papaya seed was produced in 2016 for approximately 2.11 metric tons (in fresh/wet condition). Papaya seed contains a metabolizable energy of 3570 kcal/kg [3] and a protein content of 24–30% [2], making it an excellent alternative broiler feedstuff. Papaya seed has previously been used in broiler diets to decrease the usage of maize and SBM. Due to its high fibre (26.2–45.6%, depending on the papaya varieties) and anti-nutritional compounds (oxalate, tannins, and phytate), papaya seed should however only be included at a maximum of 5%, since greater inclusion levels impaired growth [2,4].
Study documented that germination (sprouting) improved the nutritious content of grains/seeds [5]. Germination enhanced crude protein and crude ash content while decreasing crude fibre in Moringa seeds [6]. Moreover, germination modified fibrous fractions in grains, making them easier to digest [7]. Sprouting also decreased anti-nutritional compounds like tannins and phytic acid, allowing the legume seeds to be digested and utilized more thoroughly by animals [8]. So far, there has never been a research on the use of sprouted-papaya seed in broiler diets. The aim of this study was to evaluate how sprouted-papaya seed meal (SPSM) affected the growth and carcase traits of broilers.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Production of sprouted-papaya seed meal
The production of SPSM was initiated by collecting the papaya seed (ca 50 kg, in fresh/wet condition) from street vendors around the campus. The papaya seed was washed and spread on tray at room temperature for 24 hours. The seeds were soaked for 24 hours, and then placed in perforated bucket. To keep the seed wet during germination, the bucket was sprinkled with water on a daily basis. Papaya seeds were let to germinate for two weeks and then the seeds were collected, sun-dried, and ground (finely ground using a 3 mm screen). Samples of papaya seed and SPSM were obtained for proximate analysis [9]. The results of analysis showed that papaya seed meal had 7.19% moisture, 21.7% crude protein, 22.9% crude fat, 38.7% crude fibre and 10.8% ash on a dry matter basis, whereas SPSM contained 10.3% moisture, 24.7% crude protein, 21.2% crude fat, 36.9% crude fibre and 6.67% ash.
2.2. Ethical approval
The Animal Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro agreed to the in vivo trial (No. 57–06/A3/KEP/FPP).
2.3. In vivo trial
A total of 390 day-old Lohmann unsexed broiler chicks were raised with commercial starter feed containing 23% crude protein, 5% crude fibre, 5% crude fat, and 7% ash (according to feed label) from arrival to day 14. From days 14 until 36, the chicks were randomly allotted to CONT (chicks provided with control diet), SEED25 (diet containing 2.5% papaya seed meal), GERM1 (diet containing 1% SPSM), GERM25 (diet containing 2.5% SPSM) and GERM5 (diet containing 5% SPSM). The experiment was arranged according to a completely randomized design (CRD), with five treatment groups and six replicates/pens (13 chicks in each pen; each treatment group consisted of 78 chicks). The chicks were reared in an open-sided broiler house with rice husk bedding. A constant lighting schedule was employed throughout the study. The feeds (in mash form) were formulated to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous and met the Indonesian National Standard for broiler finisher feed [10] (Table 1). On days 4 and 18, the chicks were administered Newcastle disease vaccination by eye drops and drinking water, respectively. On day 12, Gumboro vaccine was also administered by drinking water. Chicks’ body weight (individually weighed), feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were recorded weekly. Feed intake was measured as the difference between the amount of feed offered and what was left over, while FCR was computed by dividing of feed intake by the weight gain of broilers. Feed cost per kg live body weight gain and income over feed cost were also determined. At day 36 (after 22 days feeding trial), one male chick per pen (six chicks per treatment group) was slaughtered, defeathered and eviscerated for the assessment of carcase traits of broilers.
Table 1.
Ingredients and nutritional components of treatment diets (days 14–36)
| Items (%, unless otherwise noted) | CONT | SEED25 | GERM1 | GERM25 | GERM5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yellow corn | 58.5 | 57.0 | 58.1 | 57.3 | 56.1 |
| Palm oil | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.90 | 2.90 | 2.80 |
| Soybean meal | 34.7 | 33.7 | 34.2 | 33.5 | 32.3 |
| Papaya seed meal | - | 2.50 | - | - | - |
| SPSM | - | - | 1.00 | 2.50 | 5.00 |
| DL-methionine, 990 g | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
| Bentonite | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Limestone | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 1.30 | 1.30 | 1.30 | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Premix | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| Chlorine chloride | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Salt | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Calculated chemical components: | |||||
| ME, (kcal/kg)1 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 |
| Crude protein | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Crude fibre | 5.51 | 6.33 | 5.83 | 6.30 | 7.08 |
| Feed price (IDR/kg) | 7,921 | 7,741 | 7,836 | 7,720 | 7,520 |
Key:1ME (metabolizable energy) was calculated based on formula [11]: 40.81 {0.87 [crude protein + 2.25 crude fat + nitrogen‐free extract] + 2.5}
CONT: chicks received control diet, SEED25: diet containing 2.5% papaya seed meal, GERM1: diet containing 1% SPSM, GERM25: diet containing 2.5% SPSM, GERM5: diet containing 5% SPSM
The data were statistically treated according to CRD using analysis of variance (ANOVA, SPSS 16.0 version). The Duncan multi-range test was employed when dietary treatments showed a significant effect (p < 0.05).
3. Results and discussion
Data in the current study showed that dietary incorporation of SPSM up to 5% did not impair (p > 0.05) final body weight, weight gain or cumulative feed intake of broilers (Table 2). From an economical point of view, feeding SPSM up to 5% in the diet, however, exhibited no (p > 0.05) economic implications as measured by feed cost per kg live body weight gain and income over feed cost. Different from SPSM, feeding 2.5% of papaya seed meal compromised (p < 0.05) body weight (9.15%), weight gain (11.6%) and feed intake (7.69%) when compared to control. This may suggest that sprouting could improve the digestibility and, hence, nutrient utilization of seeds [7,8]. However, this inference should be regarded carefully as feeding SPSM at 5% compromised FCR of broilers. Also, at 5%, SPSM reduced the proportion of broiler breast meat as compared with SPSM fed at 1 or 2.5% (Table 3). Higher fibre content as well as anti-nutritional factors in 5% SPSM-based diet could have reduced feed digestibility resulting in less conversion of feed into body mass. When compared with papaya seed meal, sprouted-papaya seed did not compromise (p < 0.05) feed consumption of birds in this study. The improved nutritional qualities (i.e. the increase in crude protein and decrease crude fibre, as mentioned above) and less anti-nutritional factors due to germination [5] seemed to not limit feed consumption of broilers. Yet, we could not provide the actual data on the reduced anti-nutritional compounds due to germination in the current investigation.
Table 2.
Growth performance of broilers (days 14–36)
| Items | CONT | SEED25 | GERM1 | GERM25 | GERM5 | SEM | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial BW, g | 354 | 354 | 353 | 352 | 353 | 3.23 | 1.00 |
| Final BW, g | 1704a | 1548b | 1692a | 1625ab | 1632ab | 18.5 | 0.04 |
| Weight gain, g | 1351a | 1194b | 1339a | 1273ab | 1279ab | 17.1 | 0.02 |
| Cumulative FI, g | 2249a | 2076b | 2311a | 2241a | 2406a | 29.9 | <0.01 |
| FCR | 1.67b | 1.74b | 1.73b | 1.76b | 1.88a | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Feed cost per kg live BWG (IDR)a | 13,203 | 13,470 | 13,539 | 13,602 | 14,191 | 143 | 0.28 |
| Income over feed cost (IDR)b | 11,157 | 10,243 | 10,652 | 10,334 | 9,643 | 225 | 0.31 |
Key:a,bMeans with various superscript letters within the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05)
aValues were taken into account at the time of study as the cost of feed consumed to produce a kg live weight gain
bTotal revenue minus total feed cost were used to calculate values at the time of the study
CONT: chicks received control diet, SEED25: diet containing 2.5% papaya seed meal, GERM1: diet containing 1% SPSM, GERM25: diet containing 2.5% SPSM, GERM5: diet containing 5% SPSM, BW: body weight, FI: feed intake, FCR: feed conversion ratio, BWG: body weight gain, IDR: Indonesian Rupiah (currency)
Table 3.
Carcase traits of broilers
| Items | CONT | SEED25 | GERM1 | GERM25 | GERM5 | SEM | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eviscerated carcase (% live BW) | 65.5 | 66.1 | 68.2 | 67.8 | 69.7 | 0.76 | 0.44 |
| % eviscerated carcase | |||||||
| Breast | 36.9ab | 36.6ab | 38.9a | 38.8a | 33.9b | 0.56 | 0.04 |
| Wings | 11.9 | 12.1 | 10.2 | 10.9 | 11.7 | 0.26 | 0.12 |
| Thigh | 17.7 | 16.4 | 15.2 | 16.3 | 16.7 | 0.33 | 0.18 |
| Drumstick | 15.9 | 16.2 | 14.6 | 15.3 | 14.3 | 0.25 | 0.06 |
| Back | 17.6 | 18.7 | 21.1 | 18.9 | 23.4 | 0.73 | 0.08 |
| Abdominal fat | 1.31 | 1.33 | 1.08 | 1.31 | 1.30 | 0.09 | 0.91 |
| Edible gibletsa | 6.92 | 6.85 | 6.34 | 6.24 | 6.68 | 0.19 | 0.74 |
Key:a,bMeans with various superscript letters within the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05)
aGiblets: heart, liver and gizzard
CONT: chicks received control diet, SEED25: diet containing 2.5% papaya seed meal, GERM1: diet containing 1% SPSM, GERM25: diet containing 2.5% SPSM, GERM5: diet containing 5% SPSM, BW: body weight
4. Conclusions
Giving SPSM in diets up to a proportion of 2.5% exhibited no negative consequences, but feeding papaya seed meal at the same proportion reduced final body weight, weight gain, and cumulative feed consumption. Feeding SPSM to broiler chickens at 5% of their diet impaired their FCR and breast percentage.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi [187-17/UN7.6.1/PP/2021].
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
References
- [1].Oliveira ALB. Market analysis for papaya (production and trade). Conference: 77th Plenary Meeting of the OECD Fruit and Vegetables Scheme At, Paris, France, December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Sugiharto S. Papaya (Carica papaya L.) seed as a potent functional feedstuff for poultry-A review. Vet World. 2020;13:1613–1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Rahmasari R, Hertamawati RT, Rafli AK, et al. Addition of papaya (Carica papaya L.) seed meal on quail production performance. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;672:012040. [Google Scholar]
- [4].Bolu SAO, Sola-Ojo FE, Olorunsanya OA, et al. Effect of graded levels of dried pawpaw (Carica papaya) seed on the performance, haematology, serum biochemistry and carcass evaluation of chicken broilers. Int J Poult Sci. 2009;8:905–909. [Google Scholar]
- [5].Sugiharto S. The use of sprouted grains as dietary feed ingredients for broilers-a brief overview. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2021;33:3. [Google Scholar]
- [6].Chinma CE, Lata LJ, Chukwu TM, et al. Effect of germination time on the proximate composition and functional properties of Moringa seed flour. Afr J Agric Technol Environ. 2017;6:117–133. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Malama F, Nyau V, Marinda P, et al. Effect of sprouting on selected macronutrients and physical properties of four Zambian common bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris) varieties. J Food Nutr Res. 2020;8:238–243. [Google Scholar]
- [8].Fouad AA, Rehab FMA. Effect of germination time on proximate analysis,bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) sprouts. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2015;14:233–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].AOAC . Official methods of analysis. 16 th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- [10].Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI 8173.3:2015) . Pakan Ayam Ras Pedaging (Broiler) - Bagian 3: Masa Akhir (Finisher). Badan Standardisasi Nasional, Jakarta. 2015;3:1-5. . (article in Indonesian language). [Google Scholar]
- [11].Bolton W. Poultry Nutrition. MAFF Bulletin No.174. London:HMSO;1967. [Google Scholar]
