Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR logoLink to Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR
letter
. 2021 Oct 29;57:147. doi: 10.29390/cjrt-2021-069

Noninvasive ventilation duration as an outcome predictor in acute exacerbation of COPD and respiratory failure: The saga continues

Habib Md Reazaul Karim 1, Maria João Araújo 2, Antonio M Esquinas 3
PMCID: PMC8555524  PMID: 34761102

Dear Editor,

We applaud the study by Ghazala et al. [1], where the authors analyzed predictors of clinical outcomes in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Although the study is retrospective in nature, the use of multivariate regression analysis is pragmatic. Understanding predictive models is a hot topic; the study finding was thought provoking and, and we consider some key aspects for discussion.

The APACHE-III (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) is an acceptable and predictable factor; however, body mass index (BMI) as an independent predictor needs more study [2]. NIV settings and titration of positive airway pressures used in an obese patient are crucial, as these patients often require higher pressures to overcome the obstruction [3]. The data on sleep-disordered breathing; worsening clinical condition; reasons for delaying or prolong NIV, PaO2 (partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood), and/or SpO2 (peripheral oxygen saturation); and pH levels would be informative [4].

Furthermore, adherence to predefined NIV failure criteria or criteria to start invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) following NIV failure is crucial as it can deter possible practice variations, impacting the decision of IMV and thereby the outcome. Accordingly, the authors’ finding that NIV duration did not predict the clinical outcome, even in failed patients, might be erroneous. Additionally, a dedicated team caring for NIV patients impacts the clinical outcomes [5].

Therefore, in our assessment, discarding the impact of NIV duration and accepting the BMI as a predictor of worse clinical outcomes appears premature on the background of current evidence. We would welcome the authors’ opinions on these points.

Habib Md Reazaul Karim
Maria João Araújo
Antonio M Esquinas

References

  • 1.Ghazala L, Hatipoğlu U, Devnani T, et al. duration of noninvasive ventilation is not a predictor of clinical outcomes in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD and respiratory failure. Can J Respir Ther 2021;57:113–18. doi: 10.29390/cjrt-2021-021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Steriade AT, Johari S, Sargarovschi N, et al. Predictors of outcome of noninvasive ventilation in severe COPD exacerbation. BMC Pulm Med 2019;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0892-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kushida CA, Chediak A, Berry RB, et al. Positive Airway Pressure Titration Task Force; American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Clinical guidelines for the manual titration of positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med 2008;4(2):157–71. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.27133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Osadnik CR, Tee VS, Carson-Chahhoud KV, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for the management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7(7):CD004104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004104.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vaudan S, Ratano D, Beuret P, et al. Impact of a dedicated noninvasive ventilation team on intubation and mortality rates in severe COPD exacerbations. Respir Care 2015;60(10):1404–8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR are provided here courtesy of Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapy

RESOURCES