Skip to main content
The Indian Journal of Medical Research logoLink to The Indian Journal of Medical Research
. 2021 May-Jun;153(5-6):563. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.318161

Authors’ response

Ira Praharaj 1, Amita Jain 3, Mini Singh 4, Anukumar Balakrishnan 5, Rahul Dhodapkar 6, Biswajyoti Borkakoty 7, Munivenkatappa Ashok 8, Pradeep Das 9, Debasis Biswas 10, Usha Kalawat 11, Jyotirmayee Turuk 12, AP Sugunan 5, Shantanu Prakash 3, Anirudh K Singh 10, Rajamani Barathidasan 6, Subhra Subhadra 12, Jyotsnamayee Sabat 12, MJ Manjunath 8, Poonam Kanta 4, Nagaraja Mudhigeti 11, Rahul Hazarika 7, Hricha Mishra 3, Kumar Abhishek 9, C Santhalembi 5, Manas Ranjan Dikhit 9, Neetu Vijay 2, Jitendra Narayan 2, Harmanmeet Kaur 2, Sidhartha Giri 1, Nivedita Gupta 1,*
PMCID: PMC8555583  PMID: 34643564

While agreeing with our findings, the researchers have suggested that the RT-PCR kit cut-offs should be adjusted by adding four cycles to the CT cut-off recommended by the manufacturer wherever pooled sample testing is being undertaken. This suggestion is based on the experiments conducted by the researchers in their laboratory. We have not conducted any such experiments and therefore, we are not in a position to comment on this suggestion.


Articles from The Indian Journal of Medical Research are provided here courtesy of Scientific Scholar

RESOURCES