Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Genom Precis Med. 2021 Oct 1;14(5):e003399. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003399

Rare, Damaging DNA Variants in CORIN and Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from Functional Genomics and Large-scale Sequencing Analyses

Minxian Wang 1,2,3, Vivian S Lee-Kim 2,4, Deepak S Atri 2,4, Nadine H Elowe 2, John Yu 2, Colin W Garvie 2, Hong-Hee Won 5, Joseph E Hadaya 1, Bryan T MacDonald 2, Kevin Trindade 6, Olle Melander 7,8, Daniel J Rader 6, Pradeep Natarajan 1,2,3,9, Sekar Kathiresan 3,9,10, Virendar K Kaushik 2, Amit V Khera 1,2,3,9, Rajat M Gupta 1,2,4
PMCID: PMC8555653  NIHMSID: NIHMS1742037  PMID: 34592835

Abstract

Background:

Corin is a protease expressed in cardiomyocytes that plays a key role in salt handling and intravascular volume homeostasis via activation of natriuretic peptides. It is unknown if Corin loss-of-function is causally associated with risk of coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods:

We analyzed all coding CORIN variants in an Italian case-control study of CAD. We functionally tested all 64 rare missense mutations in Western Blot and Mass Spectroscopy assays for pro-atrial natriuretic peptide cleavage. An expanded rare variant association analysis for Corin loss-of-function mutations was conducted in whole exome sequencing data from 37,799 CAD cases and 212,184 controls.

Results:

We observed loss-of-function variants in CORIN in 8 of 1,803 (0.4%) CAD cases versus 0 of 1,725 controls (p-value 0.007). Of 64 rare missense variants profiled, 21 (33%) demonstrated <30% of wild-type activity and were deemed damaging in the two functional assays for Corin activity. In a rare variant association study that aggregated rare loss-of-function and functionally validated damaging missense variants from the Italian study, we observed no association with CAD – 21 of 1,803 CAD cases versus 12 of 1,725 controls with adjusted odds ratio of 1.61 (95%CI 0.79 to 3.29; p = 0.17). In the expanded sequencing dataset, there was no relationship between rare loss-of-function variants with CAD was also observed (OR:1.15; 95%CI 0.89 to 1.49; p = 0.30). Consistent with the genetic analysis, we observed no relationship between circulating Corin concentrations with incident CAD events among 4,744 participants of a prospective cohort study – sex-stratified hazard ratio per standard deviation increment of 0.96 (95%CI 0.87–1.07, p = 0.48).

Conclusions:

Functional testing of missense mutations improved the accuracy of rare variant association analysis. Despite compelling pathophysiology and a preliminary observation suggesting association, we observe no relationship between rare damaging variants in CORIN or circulating Corin concentrations with risk of CAD.

Keywords: genetic association, functional genomics, natriuretic peptides, coronary artery disease

Subject terms: Functional Genomics, Genetic Association Studies

Introduction:

Genetic association studies have identified multiple genetic variants associated with the risk of coronary artery disease. The majority of these associations are for common variants, but rare variant association studies (RVAS) are increasing with the reduced cost of exome sequencing. Rare variants identified in sequencing studies are defined as single nucleotide variants (SNVs) or short insertion/deletions (indels) with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of less than 5%. Many recent exome sequencing studies have sought to link genes with a burden of rare mutations to risk of coronary artery disease, congenital heart disease, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.15 As the sample size of RVASs increase, there are more genes with multiple damaging rare variants to interpret for an association with common cardiovascular diseases.

One major challenge that limits the power of RVAS is knowing which rare variants can be aggregated in the association analysis. Ideally, only loss of function alleles that disrupt gene function or gain of function alleles that confers new or enhanced activity would be considered in a testing group, and benign alleles would be ignored. For example, to enrich harmful alleles, many groups only consider null mutations (nonsense, indel frameshift, or splice-site mutations), computationally predicted deleterious missense mutations or even all non-synonymous mutations.1 Considering only null mutations limits the power to associate genes with disease; however, the more permissive inclusion of all non-synonymous mutations is equally inaccurate since the vast majority are benign. For this reason, in silico algorithms exist to predict which amino acid substitutions result in disease using criteria such as evolutionary conservation, protein structure, and sequence homology.69 Studies that compare the accuracy of these many predictors against a gold-standard dataset of known pathogenic variants have found weak concordance and a high rate of false positivity.10,11 This has implications for RVAS findings, where functional missense mutations are collected using concordant scores among multiple in silico predictors to increase the confidence of identifying true loss of function missense mutations in a gene and then test the association of them with the risk of disease. Despite the known limitations of these computational predictions, it is not current practice to validate all predicted pathogenic variants with a biological assay.

Here we present an RVAS analysis of 1,803 cases and 1,725 controls from an early-onset coronary artery disease (CAD) cohort. Preliminary analysis identified an association between loss of function mutations in the CORIN gene and risk of CAD, and we set out to confirm this finding with functional analysis of all the missense mutations identified from exome sequencing. Corin is a type II transmembrane serine protease expressed in cardiomyocytes which converts pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (proANP) to biologically active ANP.12,13 Biochemical studies have established the role of missense mutations in several CORIN domain structures as essential for its proteolytic function.14,15 Mice lacking corin display salt-sensitive hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy.16 Individual Corin variants have been linked to risk of hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and heart failure.17,18 In larger RVAS for hypertension, however, there has been no association between Corin variants and risk of hypertension.4 This suggests that loss-of-function (LOF) Corin variants may not be sufficient to cause cardiovascular disease. More studies that combine rare variant association analysis with functional validation are necessary to determine if Corin loss of function has a causal effect on cardiovascular disease.

To determine the accuracy of the initial association between LOF Corin variants and CAD, we identified functionally disruptive missense mutations using five computational prediction algorithms and two biochemical assays for Corin proteolytic activity. We tested the activity of wild-type Corin and 64 missense mutations in the enzyme on proANP cleavage. Our results show a high false-positive rate for in silico prediction algorithms compared with the functional assay. After analysis of all functional missense mutations in our study, and expanded analysis of larger rare variant sequencing studies, we do not find an association between Corin loss of function and risk of CAD/MI. Our findings demonstrate the importance of functional validation of rare variant association results and highlight the challenges of identifying the set of functionally relevant mutations within a gene using computational methods alone.

Methods:

This research was approved by the Mass General Brigham institutional review board (protocol 2013P001840). Full description of methods is provided in Supplemental Material. In order to minimize the possibility of unintentionally sharing information that can be used to re-identify private information, the human genetic data used in this study are available at the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP) and can be accessed through the accession number listed for each study in the Supplemental Materials.

Results

Exome sequencing of an early MI cohort identifies loss of function mutations associated with disease.

To discover new genes associated with the risk of CAD, we studied 1,803 patients who presented with first myocardial infarction(MI) at age <45 years and 1,725 controls derived from the previously described Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB) Italian Study Group.19,20 The baseline characteristics of the cohort show that age and sex are matched between the cases and controls, and as expected, the prevalence of diabetes, smoking, and dyslipidemia are higher in the cases (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics for the ATVB coronary artery disease case-control study

CASE CONTROL P-Value
N 1803 1725
Baseline Age, median [Q1,Q3] 41.0 [37.0,43.0] 41.0 [37.0,43.0] 0.894
Sex (Male), n (%) 1605 (89.0) 1522 (88.5) 0.657
Type 2 diabetes, n (%) 105 (6.0) 9 (0.5) <0.001
Current smoking, n (%) 778 (44.4) 514 (30.8) <0.001
Total Cholesterol*, mg/dl, median [Q1,Q3] 216.0 [185.0,250.8] 197.0 [176.0,221.0] <0.001
HDL-Cholesterol*, mg/dl, median [Q1,Q3] 40.0 [34.0,47.0] 47.0 [40.0,55.0] <0.001
LDL-Cholesterol*, mg/dl, median [Q1,Q3] 142.0 [114.0,174.0] 120.2 [101.8,146.0] <0.001
Triglycerides*, mg/dl, median [Q1,Q3] 152.0 [106.0,208.0] 105.0 [76.0,150.0] <0.001

The Q1 and Q3 are the first and third quartiles of the distribution. For continuous variables, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test the difference. For the dichotomy variable, the Chi-squared test was used to test the difference. LDL, low-density lipoprotein. HDL, High-density lipoprotein.

*

Lipid levels were measured at baseline.

Exome sequencing and burden testing identified a statistically significant association between early-onset MI and rare LDLR loss of function mutations (p=2.31 × 10−7, Table 2). Loss of function mutations for this analysis included nonsense, frameshift, and splice-site mutations with allele frequency less than 0.001. Below the threshold of significance were several genes that have not been previously associated with CAD or MI. The CORIN gene had 8 loss of function mutations in cases and 0 in controls (p=0.0065). The majority of the genes with sub-significant associations either had no known cellular function or their function could not be tested with in vitro methods. We prioritized the Corin association for functional testing given its possible association with CAD/MI by burden testing and known role in regulating blood pressure through cleavage of pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (proANP).

Table 2:

Top 10 Genes with loss of function mutations association with CAD/MI

Gene Chromosome N cases N controls Beta* SE (Beta) P-value
LDLR 19 20 0 3.77 1.47 2.31 × 10−7
PHKB 16 9 0 2.95 1.53 0.0015
PFKP 10 9 0 2.92 1.53 0.0018
ZNF510 9 0 7 −2.81 1.57 0.0023
ZNF333 19 0 6 −2.79 1.59 0.0032
SLC12A8 3 9 0 2.76 1.52 0.0040
CNGB1 16 1 9 −1.95 0.92 0.0052
LRRC36 16 0 6 −2.64 1.59 0.0057
COL18A1 21 7 0 2.75 1.57 0.0060
CORIN 4 8 0 2.70 1.55 0.0065
*

The effect size Beta was estimated from the firth logistic regression model.

The P value was estimated from the SPA test, no multiple test correction shown in the table.

SE: standard error.

In silico identification of loss-of-function missense mutations does not demonstrate a significant association between CORIN and CAD.

We analyzed multiple sets of missense mutations to improve the genetic association between Corin loss-of-function and CAD. There is no significant association between the full list of rare missense mutations in the ATVB cohort and CAD (p=0.70, Table 3). However, it is unknown which of these non-synonymous mutations are benign, and therefore it reduces the power of this analysis to include the full set of missense mutations. To identify the pathogenic missense mutations that have a true effect on the enzymatic function of Corin, we used five in silico prediction algorithms (see Methods section) that prior studies have used in RVAS analysis.1 These prediction tools (LRT, MutationTaster, Polyphen2-HDIV, Polyphen2-HDAR, SIFT) leverage conservation between protein families and between sequence homologies, protein structures, and pathogenic mutations recorded in the ClinVar and HGMD databases, to predict whether each amino acid substitution has the potential to affect protein function.21,22 We identified 21 missense variants that are predicted as protein damaging variants in all 5 algorithms (Table SI). When including these 5 out of 5 predicted damaging mutations there is an improvement in the association with CAD (p=0.15, Table 3) compared with using the 38 variants predicted as damaging in 4 out of 5 (p=0.61) or 3 out of 5 algorithms (p=0.63). To improve the functional assessment of CORIN mutations we designed a proANP proteolytic cleavage assay.

Table 3:

Corin rare variant association with coronary artery disease in ATVB cohort with different computational predictions

VARIANTS N Case Carriers N Control Carriers Odds Ratio Odds Ratio 95% CI P Value
LOF 8 0 14.84 0.71–307.88 0.0065
LOF+3OF5 35 29 1.13 0.68–1.86 0.629
LOF+4OF5 34 28 1.14 0.69–1.90 0.605
LOF+5OF5 24 13 1.61 0.81–3.18 0.155
All Missense 47 47 0.92 0.61–1.39 0.698

LOF: LOFTEE algorithm predicted high confidence loss-of-function variants (stop gained, frameshift, and splice variants). For the missense variants, nOF5 represents n algorithms out of 5 algorithms predicated as damaging. The 5 algorithms are SIFT, PolyPhen2-HDIV, PolyPhen2-HVAR, LRT, and MutationTaster. “All Missense” represents all the missense variants of the CORIN gene. The effect size odds ratio was estimated from the firth logistic regression model. The P value was estimated from the SPA test, no multiple test correction shown in the table.

CI: confidence interval.

Design of in vitro functional assays of Corin proteolytic function.

The role of Corin in the cleavage of proANP to active ANP is well established. This suggests a connection to CAD through the regulation of blood pressure and vascular function. It also provides a target substrate in which to test the in vitro proteolysis of the missense Corin mutations we identified in the ATVB cohort (Table SI). We designed two complementary assays to quantify the cleavage of the 17kDa proANP protein to the biologically active ANP peptide (Figure 1). For both assays, 293T cells were transfected with either wild-type or mutant Corin. Purified proANP substrate was added to the media, and the specific activity of Corin was quantified by measuring proANP and ANP peptides by liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS, Figure 1B). These results were confirmed with a second functional assay which also quantified Corin activity in 293T cells co-transfected with Corin and proANP. The ratio of proANP and ANP bands on a Western blot correlated with Corin proteolytic activity (Figure 1C and SI). There was a high correlation between the two functional assays (r2=0.89, Figure 2B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Design of a functional assays to identify loss of function missense mutations in Corin. A) Functional assays to quantify Corin proteolysis of proANP to ANP. B) Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS) assay to quantify specific activity of Corin cleavage. C) Western blot assay to detect proANP/ANP ratio in cell supernatant.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A) Standardized wild-type Corin activity with liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy measurement of N-terminal proANP product. Wild-type Corin activity measured over 2 hours and normalized to 15N-labeled product. Data is average of 3 technical replicates. B) Correlation between Western Blot and LCMS Assays for Corin specific activity. The two independent assays used to test all Corin missense variants for cleavage of proANP substrate show high correlation (r2=0.89). Data is average of 3 biologic replicates.

Functional testing of specific activity of Corin missense mutations

The specific activity of 64 corin missense mutations identified in the ATVB discovery cohort (Table SI) was quantified in triplicate by LCMS. Two missense mutations, S985A (in the protease domain) and D336Y (in an LDLR domain necessary for substrate identification) were included as positive controls for the assay based on published reports that they affect the enzymatic function of Corin.15 We defined loss-of-function as specific activity of <30% normalized to wild-type Corin function.

The LCMS assay for Corin proteolytic activity identified 21 loss-of-function missense mutations (Figure 3A) with <30% normalized Corin function. As predicted, the positive control missense mutations S985A and D336Y had complete loss of Corin specific activity (Figure 3B). Other mutations with <5% specific activity were D373N, E374K, C599Y, C599R, E649K, C790Y, R801A, R809C, C970R, and G986S. These mutations are in multiple functional domains in the Corin protein, including the C-terminus active protease domain (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

A) Liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LCMS) specific activity for each of the 64 Corin missense mutations identified in the ATVB Discovery Cohort. All variants under the dotted blue line have < 30% Specific Activity (the mass of proANP substrate cleaved per minute, normalized to wild-type Corin activity), and are considered loss-of-function mutations. B) Known loss-of-function mutations S985A and D336Y show no Corin proteolytic activity on proANP substrate in the LCMS assay. All data is the average of 3 biological replicates*.

*The error bar in the figure represents standard error.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Diagram of loss-of-function Corin mutations, defined by <30% normalized wild-type Corin function in the liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy functional assay. While multiple domains contain damaging mutations, the majority are in the protease domain.

Correlation between computational predictions and functional testing of Corin

We directly compared the validity of the results from in silico predictions with our functional assay data. The algorithms each independently predict between 37 and 51 missense mutations out of the 64 functional tested missenses as damaging. However, among the damaging variants of each prediction tool, only 37 – 44% had less than 30% specific activity in the LCMS functional assay (Figure 5A). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of the individual computational predictors relative to the gold-standard assay (functional validation). The accuracy of the predictive algorithms improves when they are aggregated to identify the set of missense mutations predicted as pathogenic with multiple computational tools (Figure 5B, 5C). The variants predicted as pathogenic in 4/5 or all 5 algorithms account for all the variants with a specific activity of < 30% compared with wild-type Corin in the LCMS assay (Figure 5C). However, these 4/5 and 5/5 variants also include a large number of false positives that do not show evidence that they are loss of function in the enzymatic assay (Figure 5C).

Figure 5. Correlation of functional assay with computational prediction tools.

Figure 5.

A) The proportion of variants with < 30% normalized wild-type activity out of all the damaging variants predicted by each tool, lower percentage value in each bar. The upper values in each bar represent the number of missense variants predicted as damaging by each in silico prediction tools out of the 64 missense variants found in the ATVB cohort. B) The proportion of variants with < 30% normalized wild-type activity as a function of the number of algorithms that predict as damaging for each missense. C) The percentage of wild-type activity of each missense as a function of the number of algorithms that predict as damaging.

No evidence of rare variant association for Corin when including validated loss-of-function missense mutations.

We further grouped the functional validated loss-of-function missense mutations (< 30% normalized to wild-type Corin function) into the LOFTEE predicted null variants (stop gained, frameshift, and splice variants). The re-analysis was conducted in the original ATVB cohort as well as further included samples from additional three large cohorts, which then in total have 37,799 CAD/MI cases and 212,184 controls (Figure 6 and Methods section for cohort details). In this setting, we didn’t observe significant association between the rare loss-of-function variants with CAD, the fixed effect meta-analysis has P value of 0.30, with OR 1.15 (95 CI 0.89 – 1.49), Figure 6. A sensitivity analysis using LOFTEE predicted null variants across all four cohorts has the same null association, meta-analysis P value of 0.12 with OR 1.35 (95 CI 0.92 – 1.98), Figure SII. Another sensitivity analysis using <5% wild-type Corin activity to select loss-of-function missense mutations together with LOFTEE null variants has null association also, meta-analysis P value of 0.24 with OR 1.19 (95 CI 0.89 – 1.58), Figure SIII. Taken together, no evidence of rare loss-of-function variant association for Corin with CAD/MI disease risk.

Figure 6. Forest plot for the association of the rare loss-of-function variants with coronary artery disease with functional validated data.

Figure 6.

For each testing data set, the variant testing group includes LOFTEE predicated high confidence loss-of-functions plus missense variants with functionally validated < 30% normalized wild-type activity. The effect size odds ratio and P value was estimated from the firth logistic regression model. The META row is the result of the fixed effects meta-analysis of the four testing data sets.

No association between plasma soluble Corin and first major adverse cardiovascular event.

To determine whether low plasma Corin is associated with incident risk of cardiovascular disease, we measured Corin in samples from the Malmo Diet and Cancer (MDC) study, a prospective observational study of ~30,000 residents of Malmö, Sweden enrolled between 1991 and 1996.23 This cohort includes subjects with early onset and later onset CAD. After quality control and excluding samples with prevalent cardiovascular disease, 4,744 participants were used in the final analysis, see Methods section. The mean (SD) age at baseline was 57.4(5.9) years and 61.0% were female. The median [IQR] of Corin was 686.7 [491.7–945.3] pg/mL. Females had approximately one standard deviation lower Corin concentrations compared to males (−0.94 SD, p < 0.001) and 31.3% of the variance of log Corin is explained by sex. Current smoking status was also strongly associated with lower Corin concentrations (−0.43 SD, p < 0.001).

These participants were followed for mean (SD) 18.6 (4.8) years (total 88,250 patient follow-up years) and 543 (11.4%) sustained the primary outcome - major adverse cardiac events (MACE), see Methods. After adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, there was no association between Corin and MACE (HR 0.96 per Corin SD, 95% CI 0.87–1.07, p = 0.48). Only adjusting for sex also showed no association for Corin with MACE (HR 0.99 per Corin SD, 95% CI 0.90–1.09, p = 0.78). There was no difference in Corin levels between incident MACE cases and controls among males (p = 0.87) and females (p = 0.29) (p interaction = 0.63, Figure SIV). Sensitivity analyses restricting follow-up period also demonstrated no association between Corin and MACE in multivariable models: 5 years (67 events, p = 0.90), 10 years (178 events, p = 0.62), and 15 years (329 events, p = 0.54).

Analysis of secondary outcomes included congestive heart failure (CHF) and all-cause mortality in MACE. There were 416 (8.8%) coronary events, 209 (4.4%) CHF events, and 1,124 (23.7%) all-cause deaths. There was no evidence of association for incident coronary events (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82–1.05, p = 0.23), incident CHF (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83–1.18, p = 0.89), or all-cause mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87–1.00, p = 0.06).

Discussion:

Rare variant association studies present an opportunity to identify new genes and novel mechanisms of cardiovascular disease. Since these studies are not powered to identify individual pathogenic variants, current methods look for the combined effect of all loss of function variants within a gene. Burden testing in rare variant association studies has validated previously known causal genes associated with CAD/MI, aortic dissection, and congenital heart disease.1,2,24 To expand the power of RVAS identifying the correct loss of function mutations to include in the burden analysis remains a challenge. There are dozens of computational algorithms that seek to allow the inclusion of loss of function missense mutations, but their accuracy has not been systematically tested with functional assays.

Here we test all the missense mutations identified in a RVAS gene for early-onset CAD/MI. We initially identify null mutations in the CORIN gene, and found its association with early-onset MI in the ATVB cohort. Given the role of Corin in cleaving proANP to active ANP, this was a biologically plausible genetic association that warranted validation. When we expanded the analysis to include all missense mutations the association between Corin and CAD/MI weakened. This is expected since most missense mutations have no effect on Corin function. To provide a gold standard for inclusion of loss of function missense mutations in the genetic association analysis, we designed two functional assays for Corin missense mutations. The RVAS findings were then re-analyzed with quantitative knowledge of Corin enzymatic activity, and there was ultimately no significant association between Corin loss of function and CAD/MI risk. This finding was confirmed by including 246,455 more subjects from another three big sequencing cohort for CAD/MI in the RVAS analysis. Each of the five computational prediction algorithms showed a high false positive rate, and even when limited to the subset of predicted pathogenic mutations in all five algorithms, the inaccuracy of these in silico methods over-estimated produced a spurious association that was disapproved with our in vitro functional assay.

Our exhaustive analysis of an early positive signal in a RVAS serves as a cautionary tale for the interpretation of these studies. The early finding of an association between rare, damaging mutations in Corin and CAD/MI risk was invalidated by including loss-of-function missense variants tested in our functional proANP processing assays. The spurious association for Corin was also invalidated by including more sequenced subjects in the RVAS. Taken together, this suggests that small association studies that link individual Corin variants with cardiovascular disease may be specific to certain populations. For example, the previously reported Corin variant associations such as the T555I/Q568P haplotype and the R530S missense mutation may have large effects exclusively in the African-American25 and Han Chinese18 populations in which they were first identified. Whether this is because of polygenic risk from other mutations in these populations is an open question that requires further study.

Functional testing of all missense mutations in a protein also provides important insight on the limited accuracy of the widely used computational prediction algorithms for variant interpretation. Each algorithm only showed less than 50% positive prediction with the gold-standard functional assay, and though aggregating all five algorithms improved the positive predictive value, there were many false positives that did not affect Corin function in vitro. This suggests that current in silico methods to include functional missense mutations in RVAS need improvement and studies should separately report true null mutations (i.e. stop gained, frameshift, and splice variants) and missense mutations associated with disease. Functional assays like the ones in this paper present one avenue for improving in silico prediction. Our data show that certain protein domains in Corin contain the majority of functional missense mutations (Figure 4). Many algorithms incorporate protein structure in their predictions, but functional assays provide a more concrete set of data on which to train these algorithms.

It remains a challenge to expand these variant testing methods to all genes. In this case, Corin function as a proANP convertase is well characterized, and its enzymatic function could be easily tested in vitro. Other genes may have complex functions that require in vivo testing, and therefore cannot be scaled to include more than a small fraction of missense mutations. In fact, one limitation of our study may be that Corin has other functions or even other substrates that are not captured in our assay. We expect that the mutations that reduce Corin proteolytic cleavage of proANP would similarly affect enzymatic function of other substrates, but have not tested other substrates or possible non-enzymatic functions.

Functional testing in a different cell type may also identify novel Corin substrates or biological functions relevant to CAD risk. Single cell RNA-sequencing analysis or the mouse aorta and human heart show that Corin is exclusively expressed in a subtype of ventricular cardiomyocytes.26,27 Primary human ventricular cardiomyocytes are not amenable to high-throughput functional analysis given the technical limitations of culturing and transfecting these cells. The ideal study would test Corin function with in-situ genome editing of all missense mutations in ventricular cardiomyocytes, as has been done for BRCA1 in an immortalized cancer cell line.28 These technologies have not yet available for primary human cells, but when editing efficiency in non-immortalized cells improves this will be an exciting new tool for functional genomic analysis.

It is important to note that this study does not rule out a role for Corin in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases. Though we find no association between genetic loss of function and risk of disease, there are several studies that link serum Corin levels to adverse outcomes. Soluble Corin levels portend poor outcomes for patients after myocardial infarction and with congestive heart failure.2931 These studies do not show a relationship between Corin levels and incident risk of either disease, however there may be a larger effect in younger cohorts. Therefore, the causal role of Corin remains unclear, while there is a pathophysiologic connection between Corin and poor clinical outcomes.

Though this study did not find a significant association for an initially promising RVAS signal in the Corin gene, the implications of this null hypothesis validation are important for future genetic association studies. We establish that functional testing of missense variants is necessary to determine pathogenicity. Aggregating predicted loss of function missense variants from in silico algorithms remains problematic, and will likely only improve with better gold-standard examples from systematic functional analysis. Genes with enzymatic functions, like Corin, are more easily tested with biochemical assays for the effect of a mutation on substrate cleavage. In this case the functional analysis identified an accurate set of missense mutations for association testing, and invalidated the hypothesis that Corin is causally linked to risk of CAD/MI. Many promising genetic associations will soon emerge with the expansion of RVAS to cardiovascular disease cohorts. The validation of these association findings will require some understanding of the biologic function of the gene, and variant testing in conjunction with computational analysis.

Supplementary Material

003399 - Supplemental Material

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by funding from Bayer Pharmaceuticals (to S.K. and V.K.), NIH K08HL128810, NIH R03HL148483, and NIH DP2HL152423 (to R.MG.), NIH 1K08HG010155 (to A.V.K.), a Hassenfeld Scholar Award from Massachusetts General Hospital (to A.V.K.), and a Merkin Institute Fellowship from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (to A.V.K.)

Disclosures

Dr. Khera has served as a scientific advisor to Sanofi, Medicines Company, Maze Therapeutics, Navitor Pharmaceuticals, Verve Therapeutics, Amgen, Color, and Columbia University (NIH); received speaking fees from Illumina, MedGenome, Amgen, and the Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research; received sponsored research agreements from the Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research and IBM Research.

Dr. Kathiresan is an employee of Verve Therapeutics and has received a research grant from Bayer Healthcare; and consulting fees from Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Leerink Partners, Noble Insights, MedGenome, Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Quest Diagnostics, Color Genomics, Genomics PLC, and Eli Lilly and Company; and holds equity in San Therapeutics, Catabasis Pharmaceuticals, Verve Therapeutics and Maze Therapeutics.

Non-standard Abbreviations and Acronyms

ATVB

Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

CAD

coronary artery disease

CHF

congestive heart failure

CI

confidence interval

HR

hazard ratio

LCMS

liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy

LOF

loss-of-function

MACE

major adverse cardiac events

MI

myocardial infarction

OR

odds ratio

RVAS

rare variant association study

SD

standard deviation

proANP

pro-atrial natriuretic peptide

Footnotes

Supplemental Materials:

Supplemental Methods

Supplemental Tables IIII

Supplemental Figures IIV

References 3265

References

  • 1.NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, Do R, Stitziel NO, Won H-H, Jørgensen AB, Duga S, Angelica Merlini P, Kiezun A, Farrall M, Goel A, et al. Exome sequencing identifies rare LDLR and APOA5 alleles conferring risk for myocardial infarction. Nature 2015;518:102–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Homsy J, Zaidi S, Shen Y, Ware JS, Samocha KE, Karczewski KJ, DePalma SR, McKean D, Wakimoto H, Gorham J, et al. De novo mutations in congenital heart disease with neurodevelopmental and other congenital anomalies. Science 2015;350:1262–1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jin SC, Homsy J, Zaidi S, Lu Q, Morton S, DePalma SR, Zeng X, Qi H, Chang W, Sierant MC, et al. Contribution of rare inherited and de novo variants in 2,871 congenital heart disease probands. Nat Genet 2017;49:1593–1601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Surendran P, Feofanova EV, Lahrouchi N, Ntalla I, Karthikeyan S, Cook J, Chen L, Mifsud B, Yao C, Kraja AT, et al. Discovery of rare variants associated with blood pressure regulation through meta-analysis of 1.3 million individuals. Nat Genet 2020;52:1314–1332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.The TG and HDL Working Group of the Exome Sequencing Project, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Loss-of-Function Mutations in APOC3, Triglycerides, and Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med 2014;371:22–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods 2014;11:361–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function n.d.:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu X, Li C, Mou C, Dong Y, Tu Y. dbNSFP v4: a comprehensive database of transcript-specific functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and splice-site SNVs. Genome Med 2020;12:103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting Functional Effect of Human Missense Mutations Using PolyPhen‐2. Current Protocols in Human Genetics 2013;76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ghosh R, Oak N, Plon SE. Evaluation of in silico algorithms for use with ACMG/AMP clinical variant interpretation guidelines. Genome Biol 2017;18:225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dong C, Wei P, Jian X, Gibbs R, Boerwinkle E, Wang K, Liu X. Comparison and integration of deleteriousness prediction methods for nonsynonymous SNVs in whole exome sequencing studies. Human Molecular Genetics 2015;24:2125–2137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yan W, Wu F, Morser J, Wu Q. Corin, a transmembrane cardiac serine protease, acts as a pro-atrial natriuretic peptide-converting enzyme. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2000;97:8525–8529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yan W, Sheng N, Seto M, Morser J, Wu Q. Corin, a Mosaic Transmembrane Serine Protease Encoded by a Novel cDNA from Human Heart. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1999;274:14926–14935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Knappe S, Wu F, Masikat MR, Morser J, Wu Q. Functional Analysis of the Transmembrane Domain and Activation Cleavage of Human Corin. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003;278:52363–52370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Knappe S, Wu F, Madlansacay MR, Wu Q. Identification of Domain Structures in the Propeptide of Corin Essential for the Processing of Proatrial Natriuretic Peptide. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2004;279:34464–34471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huang PL, Huang Z, Mashimo H, Bloch KD, Moskowitz MA, Bevan JA, Fishman MC. Hypertension in mice lacking the gene for endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Nature 1995;377:239–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang W, Liao X, Fukuda K, Knappe S, Wu F, Dries DL, Qin J, Wu Q. Corin Variant Associated With Hypertension and Cardiac Hypertrophy Exhibits Impaired Zymogen Activation and Natriuretic Peptide Processing Activity. Circulation Research 2008;103:502–508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang Y, Li H, Zhou J, Wang A, Yang J, Wang C, Liu M, Zhou T, Zhu L, Zhang Y, et al. A Corin Variant Identified in Hypertensive Patients That Alters Cytoplasmic Tail and Reduces Cell Surface Expression and Activity. Sci Rep 2015;4:7378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology Italian Study Group. No Evidence of Association Between Prothrombotic Gene Polymorphisms and the Development of Acute Myocardial Infarction at a Young Age. Circulation 2003;107:1117–1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Paraboschi EM, Khera AV, Merlini PA, Gigante L, Peyvandi F, Chaffin M, Menegatti M, Busti F, Girelli D, Martinelli N, et al. Rare variants lowering the levels of coagulation factor X are protective against ischemic heart disease. Haematologica 2020;105:e365–e369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, Brown GR, Chao C, Chitipiralla S, Gu B, Hart J, Hoffman D, Jang W, et al. ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Research 2018;46:D1062–D1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Shaw K, Phillips AD, Cooper DN. The Human Gene Mutation Database: building a comprehensive mutation repository for clinical and molecular genetics, diagnostic testing and personalized genomic medicine. Hum Genet 2014;133:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Berglund PG. The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study Design, biological bank and biomarker programme. Journal of Internal Medicine 1993;233:39–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wolford BN, Hornsby WE, Guo D, Zhou W, Lin M, Farhat L, McNamara J, Driscoll A, Wu X, Schmidt EM, et al. Clinical Implications of Identifying Pathogenic Variants in Individuals With Thoracic Aortic Dissection. Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine 2019;12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rame JE, Tam SW, McNamara D, Worcel M, Sabolinski ML, Wu AH, Dries DL. Dysfunctional Corin I555(P568) Allele Is Associated With Impaired Brain Natriuretic Peptide Processing and Adverse Outcomes in Blacks With Systolic Heart Failure: Results From the Genetic Risk Assessment in Heart Failure Substudy. Circ: Heart Failure 2009;2:541–548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kalluri AS, Vellarikkal SK, Edelman ER, Nguyen L, Subramanian A, Ellinor PT, Regev A, Kathiresan S, Gupta RM. Single-Cell Analysis of the Normal Mouse Aorta Reveals Functionally Distinct Endothelial Cell Populations. Circulation 2019;140:147–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tucker NR, Chaffin M, Fleming SJ, Hall AW, Parsons VA, Bedi KC, Akkad A-D, Herndon CN, Arduini A, Papangeli I, et al. Transcriptional and Cellular Diversity of the Human Heart. Circulation 2020;142:466–482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Findlay GM, Daza RM, Martin B, Zhang MD, Leith AP, Gasperini M, Janizek JD, Huang X, Starita LM, Shendure J. Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing. Nature 2018;562:217–222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gommans DHF, Revuelta-Lopez E, Lupon J, Cserkóová A, Domingo M, Vart P, van Royen N, Bayés-Genis A, van Kimmenade RRJ. Soluble Neprilysin and Corin Concentrations in Relation to Clinical Outcome in Chronic Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail 2021;9:85–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tripathi R, Wang D, Sullivan R, Fan T-HM, Gladysheva IP, Reed GL. Depressed Corin Levels Indicate Early Systolic Dysfunction Before Increases of Atrial Natriuretic Peptide/B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Heart Failure Development. Hypertension 2016;67:362–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ibebuogu UN, Gladysheva IP, Houng AK, Reed GL. Decompensated Heart Failure Is Associated With Reduced Corin Levels and Decreased Cleavage of Pro–Atrial Natriuretic Peptide. Circ: Heart Failure 2011;4:114–120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology Italian Study Group. No Evidence of Association Between Prothrombotic Gene Polymorphisms and the Development of Acute Myocardial Infarction at a Young Age. Circulation 2003;107:1117–1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:687–702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, Do R, Stitziel NO, Won H-H, Jørgensen AB, Duga S, Angelica Merlini P, Kiezun A, Farrall M, Goel A, et al. Exome sequencing identifies rare LDLR and APOA5 alleles conferring risk for myocardial infarction. Nature 2015;518:102–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Samani NJ, Erdmann J, Hall AS, Hengstenberg C, Mangino M, Mayer B, Dixon RJ, Meitinger T, Braund P, Wichmann H-E, et al. Genomewide Association Analysis of Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med 2007;357:443–453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Myocardial Infarction Genetics and CARDIoGRAM Exome Consortia Investigators. Coding Variation in ANGPTL4, LPL, and SVEP1 and the Risk of Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1134–1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McPherson R, Pertsemlidis A, Kavaslar N, Stewart A, Roberts R, Cox DR, Hinds DA, Pennacchio LA, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Folsom AR, et al. A Common Allele on Chromosome 9 Associated with Coronary Heart Disease 2007;316:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Clarke R, Peden JF, Hopewell JC, Kyriakou T, Goel A, Heath SC, Parish S, Barlera S, Franzosi MG, Rust S, et al. Genetic Variants Associated with Lp(a) Lipoprotein Level and Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2518–2528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Saleheen D, Zaidi M, Rasheed A, Ahmad U, Hakeem A, Murtaza M, Kayani W, Faruqui A, Kundi A, Zaman KS, et al. The Pakistan Risk of Myocardial Infarction Study: a resource for the study of genetic, lifestyle and other determinants of myocardial infarction in South Asia. Eur J Epidemiol 2009;24:329–338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sentí M, Tomás M, Marrugat J, Elosua R. Paraoxonase1–192 Polymorphism Modulates the Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction Risk Associated With Decreased HDLs. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001;21:415–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.The TG and HDL Working Group of the Exome Sequencing Project, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Loss-of-Function Mutations in APOC3, Triglycerides, and Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med 2014;371:22–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Seidelmann SB, Feofanova E, Yu B, Franceschini N, Claggett B, Kuokkanen M, Puolijoki H, Ebeling T, Perola M, Salomaa V, et al. Genetic Variants in SGLT1, Glucose Tolerance, and Cardiometabolic Risk. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2018;72:1763–1773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nature Genetics 2011;43:491–498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. GigaSci 2015;4:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Manichaikul A, Mychaleckyj JC, Rich SS, Daly K, Sale M, Chen W-M. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2010;26:2867–2873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li H Toward better understanding of artifacts in variant calling from high-coverage samples. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2843–2851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bailey JA. Segmental Duplications: Organization and Impact Within the Current Human Genome Project Assembly. Genome Research 2001;11:1005–1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fahed AC, Wang M, Homburger JR, Patel AP, Bick AG, Neben CL, Lai C, Brockman D, Philippakis A, Ellinor PT, et al. Polygenic background modifies penetrance of monogenic variants for tier 1 genomic conditions. Nat Commun 2020;11:3635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Khera AV, Chaffin M, Aragam KG, Haas ME, Roselli C, Choi SH, Natarajan P, Lander ES, Lubitz SA, Ellinor PT, et al. Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations. Nature Genetics 2018;50:1219–1224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Szustakowski JD, Balasubramanian S, Sasson A, Khalid S, Bronson PG, Kvikstad E, Wong E, Liu D, Davis JW, Haefliger C, et al. Advancing Human Genetics Research and Drug Discovery through Exome Sequencing of the UK Biobank. Genetic and Genomic Medicine; 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhao H, Sun Z, Wang J, Huang H, Kocher J-P, Wang L. CrossMap: a versatile tool for coordinate conversion between genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2014;30:1006–1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, Band G, Elliott LT, Sharp K, Motyer A, Vukcevic D, Delaneau O, O’Connell J, et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 2018;562:203–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, Riat HS, Ritchie GRS, Thormann A, Flicek P, Cunningham F. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol 2016;17:122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Genome Aggregation Database Consortium, Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, Collins RL, Laricchia KM, Ganna A, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 2020;581:434–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Liu X, Jian X, Boerwinkle E. dbNSFP v2.0: A Database of Human Non-synonymous SNVs and Their Functional Predictions and Annotations. Human Mutation 2013;34:E2393–E2402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function n.d.:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting Functional Effect of Human Missense Mutations Using PolyPhen-2. Current Protocols in Human Genetics 2013;76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chun S, Fay JC. Identification of deleterious mutations within three human genomes. Genome Research 2009;19:1553–1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods 2014;11:361–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Knappe S, Wu F, Madlansacay MR, Wu Q. Identification of Domain Structures in the Propeptide of Corin Essential for the Processing of Proatrial Natriuretic Peptide. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2004;279:34464–34471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lambertz P, Theisen L, Längst N, Garvie CW, MacDonald BT, Yu J, Elowe NH, Zubov D, Kaushik VK, Wunder F. Development of a novel, sensitive cell-based corin assay. Biochem Pharmacol 2019;160:62–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dey R, Schmidt EM, Abecasis GR, Lee S. A Fast and Accurate Algorithm to Test for Binary Phenotypes and Its Application to PheWAS. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2017;101:37–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang X Firth logistic regression for rare variant association tests. Front Genet 2014;5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Berglund G, Elmstähl S, Janzon L, Larsson SA. The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Design and feasibility. J Intern Med 1993;233:45–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Peleg A, Jaffe AS, Hasin Y. Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay for detection of human serine protease corin in blood. Clin Chim Acta 2009;409:85–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

003399 - Supplemental Material

RESOURCES