Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Oct 29;16(10):e0259124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259124

Bioindicator snake shows genomic signatures of natural and anthropogenic barriers to gene flow

Damian C Lettoof 1,*,#, Vicki A Thomson 2, Jari Cornelis 1, Philip W Bateman 1, Fabien Aubret 3,4, Marthe M Gagnon 4, Brenton von Takach 4,5,#
Editor: Randeep Singh6
PMCID: PMC8555784  PMID: 34714831

Abstract

Urbanisation alters landscapes, introduces wildlife to novel stressors, and fragments habitats into remnant ‘islands’. Within these islands, isolated wildlife populations can experience genetic drift and subsequently suffer from inbreeding depression and reduced adaptive potential. The Western tiger snake (Notechis scutatus occidentalis) is a predator of wetlands in the Swan Coastal Plain, a unique bioregion that has suffered substantial degradation through the development of the city of Perth, Western Australia. Within the urban matrix, tiger snakes now only persist in a handful of wetlands where they are known to bioaccumulate a suite of contaminants, and have recently been suggested as a relevant bioindicator of ecosystem health. Here, we used genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data to explore the contemporary population genomics of seven tiger snake populations across the urban matrix. Specifically, we used population genomic structure and diversity, effective population sizes (Ne), and heterozygosity-fitness correlations to assess fitness of each population with respect to urbanisation. We found that population genomic structure was strongest across the northern and southern sides of a major river system, with the northern cluster of populations exhibiting lower heterozygosities than the southern cluster, likely due to a lack of historical gene flow. We also observed an increasing signal of inbreeding and genetic drift with increasing geographic isolation due to urbanisation. Effective population sizes (Ne) at most sites were small (< 100), with Ne appearing to reflect the area of available habitat rather than the degree of adjacent urbanisation. This suggests that ecosystem management and restoration may be the best method to buffer the further loss of genetic diversity in urban wetlands. If tiger snake populations continue to decline in urban areas, our results provide a baseline measure of genomic diversity, as well as highlighting which ‘islands’ of habitat are most in need of management and protection.

Introduction

Urbanisation, the anthropogenic transformation of natural ecosystems via the growth of cities [1], introduces wildlife to a myriad of stressors such as dynamic availability of resources [2], pollution [3, 4], novel environments [5, 6] and human disturbance [7]. These novel stressors affect the behaviour, physiology and health of wildlife [8], and consequently create strong selection pressures driving evolution [911]. Additionally, urban development fragments habitats resulting in remnant patches becoming isolated islands in a matrix of urbanisation [1214]. The less-mobile, philopatric or more habitat-specialist species may persist only in these islands and not the surrounding matrix, and thus face the random genetic pressures inherent to isolated populations of such species with reduced or non-existent gene flow between sub-populations [15, 16].

Isolated populations are expected to experience increased levels of genetic drift–stochastic loss of alleles through time–and differentiation, in conjunction with reduced genetic diversity within populations [16]. In instances where the remnant population is small, a reduction in genetic diversity can potentially lead to signs of inbreeding depression [17, 18]. This inbreeding depression, the overexpression of deleterious recessive alleles in homozygotes, can also lead to a reduction in individual fitness [19, 20], while genetic drift can lead to reduced adaptive potential [16, 21]. Consequently, urban ‘island’ populations are in a fitness and adaptation arms race against the constant stressors of urbanisation.

The Australian city of Perth is built on the Swan Coastal Plain (SCP); a bioregion characterised by banksia woodland on sand dunes, intersected by north-south connected chains of ephemeral wetlands. Since 1850, urban development and agriculture in the SCP led to the loss 70% of the original wetland area [22], with most of the remaining wetlands suffering from severe degradation. Tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus) are a ~ 1 m elapid snake restricted to the cooler, wetter climates of Australia [23]; they prefer wetland habitats on the mainland, yet numerous populations exist on very dry off-shore islands [24]. Tiger snakes were once considered under threat of extinction for a number of reasons, but primarily the destruction and degradation of wetland habitats due to urbanisation [25]. Although tiger snakes are still regionally common, there is anecdotal evidence of their decline in some cities and on some islands. For example, Eastern tiger snakes (N. scutatus scutatus) were once locally abundant in greater Sydney but now only persist on the outskirts of the city [26].

The loss of tiger snakes across some of their distribution is not enough to label the species with conservation concern; however, snakes can be useful indicators of ecosystem health [2729]. Perturbation of their populations can thus inform land managers of the integrity of the environment. Prior to urbanisation, Western tiger snakes (N. scutatus occidentalis) in the SCP likely moved among ephemeral wetlands as these environments dried throughout the warmer months, but now populations only persist around, and appear restricted to, several large lakes and river edges with sufficient fringing vegetation (DL pers. obs.). Despite persisting in these fragmented wetland habitats thus far, they are exposed to and bioaccumulate a suite of contaminants that likely contribute to poorer health and decreased survival of individuals [3032]. However, the degree to which small population sizes, geographic isolation and inbreeding effects contribute to population health in these urban and peri-urban populations has not yet been investigated.

To address these knowledge gaps, we assessed the population structure and patterns of genomic diversity in tiger snake populations persisting in and around the city of Perth in Western Australia. We included a ‘recently-introduced’ off-shore island population to allow for a comparison with the genomic structure of a true island population. Analyses included calculating and comparing the effective population sizes across populations to explore the impacts of genetic drift and isolation, and compare individual heterozygosity to a body condition index [33, 34] to investigate the potential relationship between fitness and heterozygosity. We predicted that the major river systems that divide Perth (Fig 1) would be barriers to gene flow between the northern and southern localities, as observed in other species [35], and that those populations more isolated by urbanisation would show lower levels of genomic diversity, higher pairwise genomic differentiation and stronger signals of inbreeding, which would correlate with lower fitness. This study explores the contemporary population genomics of a large elapid persisting in wetlands threatened by ever-increasing urbanisation, and highlights which populations are at risk of extirpation in the future.

Fig 1. Map the studied populations of Notechis scutatus occidentalis and land-use of Perth, Western Australia.

Fig 1

Red points represent individual Western tiger snakes, and yellow points represent Eastern tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus scutatus). Grey shading represents the current distribution extent of the species (light = Western, dark = Eastern; modified from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species [37]). Land-use was classified by the 2016 Australian Land Use and Management Classification (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra. CC BY 3.0.).

Materials and methods

Study sites and sample collection

We sampled 150 tiger snakes from six wetlands around Perth: Loch McNess (n = 22; within Yanchep National Park, 31°32’45" S, 115°40’50" E), Lake Joondalup (n = 23; 31°45’37" S, 115°47’36" E) and Herdsman Lake (n = 57; 31°55’14", S 115°48’18" E), located north of the Swan/Canning River system, and Bibra Lake (n = 29; 32°05’33", S 115°49’31" E), Kogolup Lake (n = 10; 32°07’40", S 115°50’05" E) and Black Swan Lake (n = 9; 32°28’32", S 115°46’22" E) located south of the Swan/Canning River system. These study sites represent the northern extremity of the Western tiger snake distribution (Fig 1). We also collected nine samples from Carnac Island, approximately 7 km off-shore (Fig 1). Carnac Island is a small freshwater-devoid island (19 ha) with the tiger snake population thought to originate from human introduction approximately 90 years ago, with the suspected source population coming from the nearby mainland [24, 36]. Kogolup Lake, Black Swan Lake and Carnac Island were surveyed less than the other sites (a few days compared with several weeks), which resulted in lower sample sizes for these sites.

We took ventral scale clips from each snake collected from the six mainland sites during September–October 2020. We stored individual scales in 95% ethanol at -20°C until extraction. The Carnac Island tiger snakes also had scale clips collected from April 2018–January 2020 that were stored in 95% ethanol at 4°C until extraction. We also included two additional snakes from eastern Australia, > 2000 km from the Perth populations, as outgroup samples. Tiger snakes from the mainland sites were sampled under Curtin University’s Animal Research Ethics approval: ARE2018-23 and ARE2020-6; and Western Australia’s Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions permits: FO25000149 and FO25000294-2. The nine tiger snakes from Carnac Island were sampled under the University of Adelaide’s Animal Research Ethics permits: S-2016-111; and Western Australia’s Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions permits: 01-000069-3, FO25000008, and FO25000008-2.

DNA extraction, sequencing and bioinformatics pipeline

Tissue samples were sent to the DArTseq laboratory in Canberra, ACT for DNA extraction, library preparation and double-digest restriction-site associated DNA next-generation sequencing. Briefly, the library preparation consisted of DNA digestion using the restriction enzymes PtsI and HpaII, as these enzymes had previously been used for tiger snake RAD-seq library preparation. Following digestion, adapter ligation and PCR amplification, DNA libraries were sequenced on a single lane of an Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform. The DArTseq proprietary bioinformatic pipeline [38] was used to demultiplex, clean, and filter reads, then map reads to the Notechis scutatus reference genome (NCBI PRJ: PRJEB27871) and call single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Detailed methods covering DArTseq library preparation, sequencing, read filtering and SNP calling have been provided in previous publications [39, 40]. We received a SNP-by-sample matrix consisting of 161 samples and 22542 SNPs, which was read into R v4.0.3 for subsequent SNP filtering and analysis.

SNP filtering

We used a custom R script to prune unwanted SNPS and retain SNPs of interest. To remove potential bias due to sequencing or genotyping errors, we retained SNPs with total read depth > 10 and < 100, as well as those with high DArTseq reproducibility scores (no SNP < 100% reproducible in technical replicates). Reads that did not map to the reference genome in the DArTseq pipeline were also discarded. To account for bias due to linkage disequilibrium [41], we filtered out SNPs in close proximity to one another, by retaining just one SNP from each RAD locus. We also retained only SNPs that were genotyped in a high proportion of samples (callrate > 0.95), had a minor allele count ≥ 3, and observed heterozygosity < 0.6. Finally, we removed any sample that had > 20% missing data. This produced a large, high-quality SNP-by-sample matrix, with a low overall level of missing data (1%). Once filters had been applied we retained 4688 SNPs from 159 Western and two Eastern tiger snake individuals.

As a preliminary measure to investigate whether our filtered dataset was appropriate for inferring relationships between individuals and populations, we created and visually inspected a hierarchical clustering dendrogram based on Nei’ genetic distance (S1 Fig). All individuals fell within their sampled localities, and populations clustered in line with expected geographic distances and landscape barriers, including the two individuals from eastern Australia, suggesting that the retained SNP dataset was adequate for further analysis. The eastern individuals were then removed from subsequent analyses. As further confirmation of data integrity, we investigated pairwise kinship coefficients within each population. To ensure relatedness between individuals was not high enough to impact our data analysis or interpretation, we calculated pairwise kinships via the ‘beta.dosage’ function of the hierfstat package (version 0.7) [42, 43]. Four pairwise values from a total of 2604 comparisons had kinships > 0.25 but < 0.3 (commonly values of 0.25 indicate full siblings), therefore no individuals were removed.

Regional population structure

To investigate genomic distance between individuals we calculated the individual pairwise genetic distances using the ‘prevosti.dist’ function in the poppr package (version 2.9.1) [44]. We visualised these distances via the ‘cmdscale’ function, plotting the first two dimensions of the genetic distance matrix in a multidimensional scaling plot–where the distances between points are approximately equal to the dissimilarities. We then calculated pairwise population genomic differentiation values (GST) among all sampling localities using the ‘pairwise_Gst_Hedrick’ function of the mmod package (version 1.3.3) [45], and obtained p values for all population pairs using the StAMPP package (version 1.6.2) [46]. The GST metric is an FST analogue representing a standardised measure of allelic isolation that corrects for the number of subpopulations being considered.

To explore genomic structure and assess potential gene flow among populations, we searched for genomic groups using the TESS3 algorithm–a spatially explicit ancestry estimation model from the tess3r package (version 1.1) [47, 48]. The ‘tess3’ function incorporates the latitudes and longitudes of each sampled individual to account for the influence of isolation-by-distance on ancestry coefficients, with large drops or plateaus in the scree plot identifying useful values of K for inference of population genetic structure (S2 Fig). We considered K values of 2, 3 and 4 most useful for describing the high-level genetic structure across the region, as these values showed the largest reductions in cross-entropy, with a plateau starting to form at K > 4. For finer-scale investigation of population structuring we also plotted ancestry coefficients of K = 5, 6 and 7 (S3 Fig). To confirm whether there SNPs under putative selection were driving patterns of population structure, we conducted a genome scan for outlier loci using the ‘pvalue’ function. This outlier test uses overall differentiation to discern if a portion of SNPs have greater allele frequency differences than expect from a neutral distribution [49]. We used K = 4 as we considered this the most useful for inference, and a Benjamini-Hochberg correction to achieve a false discovery rate of one in 10 000.

To investigate isolation-by-distance, we calculated the multilocus spatial autocorrelation for the mainland, and subset of northern and southern populations of snakes, respectively. The spatial autocorrelation analysis was conducted in Genalex (version 6.5) add-on in Excel [50, 51].

Population genomic diversity

To investigate patterns of within population genomic diversity, we calculated standard genetic diversity metrics for all a-priori populations using the Genalex in Excel. The diversity metrics included mean values for the number of alleles (NA), effective number of alleles (AE), information index (I), observed heterozygosity (HO), expected heterozygosity (HE), and the fixation index (Wright’s inbreeding coefficient, FIS). We also calculated the number of private alleles in each population as an additional measure of genetic distinctiveness. To standardise the number of private alleles for different sample sizes among populations we bootstrapped private allele calculations by resampling nine individuals per population 100 times, and taking the mean and SE of all bootstraps.

Heterozygosity-fitness correlations

As individual heterozygosity is often related to individual fitness [21, 52, 53], we modelled the relationship between individual heterozygosity and body condition of all genotyped individuals. Previous work has shown that approximately 50% of the variation in snake body condition estimates results from stored body fat, while organ mass such as muscle and liver account for the remainder [54, 55]. To determine body condition we calculated a scaled mass index (SMI) for each snake using the formula: SMI=WiL0LibSMA where Wi and Li are the weight and snout-vent length (SVL) of individuals, L0 is the arithmetic mean length of all sampled individuals, and bSMA is the scaling exponent estimated by the standardised major axis regression of mass on length of all sampled individuals [56, 57]. We consider the SMI to be an estimate of fitness with higher values corresponding to fitter individuals [33]. To increase accuracy of body condition calculations, we excluded snakes with obvious gastric food items or pregnancy. We also excluded Carnac Island snakes as this population was sampled in summer, a time when these individuals potentially have low body condition (from low prey and water availability). Based on 91 snakes, L0 used in the equation was 757.1 mm, and the bSMA was 2.98. To explore evidence of heterozygosity-fitness correlations we ran a general linear mixed model (GLMM) using the ‘glmer’ function of the lme4 package (version 1.25) [58]; with SMI as the response variable, individual heterozygosity and site as fixed predictor variables and to account for sex-biased differences, sex as a random factor. We used a histogram of the model residuals to confirm the assumptions of linearity.

In addition, we compared body condition with g2 –a proxy for identity disequilibrium (inbreeding) [53, 59]. A g2 = 0 means no variance of inbreeding in the sample. With the inbreedR package (version 0.3.2) [60], we used the ‘r2_wf’ function to calculate the expected correlation between inbreeding level (f) and body condition, and the ‘r2_hf’ to calculate the correlation between inbreeding level (f) and individual heterozygosity.

Effective population size

The effective population size (Ne) of a site represents the estimated number of breeding adults in a single generation of an ideal population that shows the same degree of genetic diversity as the measured population [61, 62]. Theoretically, small estimates of Ne reflect small, isolated populations suffering increased drift and lower fitness (e.g. through inbreeding), whereas large values of Ne reflect large and genetically diverse populations [63, 64]. An effective population size can also be used to estimate adult census size [65]. To estimate Ne of each population we used the widely-used linkage disequilibrium method, as it is considered one of the most suitable for single-sample datasets [62]. Ne estimates were calculated using the NeEstimator v2.1 [66].

Results

Regional population structure

We found expected levels of genomic differentiation between populations, based on geographic distance and landscape barriers between sites (Table 1). Carnac Island was the most differentiated from other populations (pairwise GST = 0.29–0.40). The most geographically distant pair of sites, Yanchep and Black Swan, exhibited a moderate level of differentiation (GST = 0.26). Black Swan Lake was less differentiated from Kogolup and Bibra Lakes (GST = 0.13–14) than Yanchep was to Herdsman Lake (GST = 0.23), despite these pairs of locations being a similar geographic distance from one another (~45 km). Analysis of spatial autocorrelation identified significant values of the autocorrelation coefficient r persisting for distances up to 38 km (S4 Fig). We found a difference in the decay of spatial autocorrelation between the northern and southern clusters, with the northern cluster intercepting r = 0 at about 30 km and the southern cluster intercepting r = 0 at about 12 km.

Table 1. Pairwise values of population genomic differentiation (GST) of Notechis scutatus occidentalis around Perth, Western Australia.

Site Yanchep Lake Joondalup Herdsman Lake Bibra Lake Kogolup Lake Black Swan Lake Carnac Island
Yanchep (n = 22) 0
Lake Joondalup (n = 23) 0.14 0
Herdsman Lake (n = 57) 0.24 0.18 0
Bibra Lake (n = 29) 0.24 0.20 0.21 0
Kogolup Lake (n = 10) 0.22 0.19 0.20 0.07 0
Black Swan Lake (n = 9) 0.26 0.22 0.23 0.14 0.13 0
Carnac Island (n = 9) 0.40 0.38 0.38 0.31 0.29 0.29 0

All non-zero values are highly significant (p < 0.001).

The outlier test identified 131 (2.8% of 4688) SNPs as being under putative selection. These loci demonstrate significantly higher or lower among-population genetic differentiation than expected under neutrality, many of which are possibly driven by the differentiation between Carnac Island and the mainland populations. While this small number of SNPs is unlikely to have substantially influenced our observed population structure, these loci could be responsible for influencing fitness under differing environmental conditions, and thus provide a basis for further study.

The multidimensional scaling plot (Fig 2) showed four main population clusters of tiger snakes in the Perth region, representing (1) Carnac Island, (2) Herdsman Lake, (3) Yanchep and Joondalup lakes, and (4) all three lakes (Bibra, Kogolup and Black Swan Lakes) on the southern side of the Swan River. 24.5% of the total variation was explained by the first two axis. The Carnac Island cluster separated strongly from the other three clusters on both the first and second coordinate.

Fig 2. Multidimensional scaling plot of genetic distance between Notechis scutatus occidentalis individuals from Perth, Western Australia.

Fig 2

Each population has been given a unique icon. Axis one explained 15.1% and axis one explained 9.4% of the total variance.

Investigation of the cross-entropy scree plot produced using the tess3r package indicated a likely number of ancestral linages at 2 ≤ K ≤ 4 (S2 Fig). Plotting ancestry coefficients for all individuals at each of these K values highlights the genomic separation of the northern lakes from the southern lakes (K = 2), with Herdsman Lake separating from the two other northern lakes at K = 3, and Carnac Island separating from the southern lakes at K = 4 (Fig 3). With finer-scale population splitting, Lake Joondalup separates from the northern lakes (K = 5) while Kogolup Lake and Black Swan Lake share ancestry with Carnac Island (S4 Fig). At K = 6, Black Swan Lake separates from the southern lakes, and Kogolup Lake is only recognised as a unique different population at K = 7 (at which point all a-priori populations cluster separately). S5 Fig visualises the hierarchical population genomic structure for K values between 2 and 6.

Fig 3. Admixture bar plot comparing population structure in Notechis scutatus occidentalis from Perth, Western Australia.

Fig 3

Each tick mark on the x-axis represents an individual snake, which are grouped by sampling locations. The dashed line represents the biogeographic barrier of the Swan/Canning rivers separating the northern and southern sampling localities. The y-axis represents the fraction of individuals’ genome that originates from a particular ancestral population, each of which has been given a unique colour.

Genomic diversity and health

Genomic diversity was generally lower in populations north of the river than in populations south of the river, with the Carnac Island population having the highest heterozygosity of all studied populations (Table 2). Observed heterozygosity, specifically, was 25–33% lower in the northern populations. Observed heterozygosity did not differ from expected heterozygosity in most populations, although Carnac Island showed a slightly lower Ho (0.13) than He (0.14). Carnac Island had the highest relative number of private alleles (328). The signal of inbreeding (i.e. FIS values) increased with the level of geographic isolation in a-priori populations; the true island population (Carnac Island) had the highest FIS value (0.05), with the mainland populations most impacted by urbanisation having higher FIS values (0.04–0.02) than less disturbed populations (≤ 0). While these values are close to zero, they likely reflect genome-wide patterns and differences between populations, with low values not unexpected when using a low minor allele frequency threshold.

Table 2. Genetic diversity estimates of seven populations of Notechis scutatus occidentalis around Perth, Western Australia.

Site N A A E I Ho He F IS Private alleles
Yanchep (n = 22) 1.32 (0.01) 1.14 (<) 0.13 (<) 0.08 (<) 0.08 (<) 0.00 (<) 55.79 (0.89)
Lake Joondalup (n = 23) 1.33 (0.01) 1.15 (<) 0.14 (<) 0.09 (<) 0.09 (<) 0.02 (<) 56.27 (0.53)
Herdsman Lake (n = 57) 1.39 (0.01) 1.15 (<) 0.14 (<) 0.09 (<) 0.09 (<) 0.04 (<) 69.49 (0.73)
Bibra Lake (n = 29) 1.45 (0.01) 1.20 (<) 0.19 (<) 0.12 (<) 0.12 (<) 0.03 (<) 81.73 (0.86)
Kogolup Lake (n = 10) 1.39 (0.01) 1.19 (<) 0.18 (<) 0.12 (<) 0.12 (<) -0.02 (<) 68.17 (0.59)
Black Swan Lake (n = 9) 1.38 (0.01) 1.19 (<) 0.18 (<) 0.12 (<) 0.12 (<) -0.02 (<) 111.30 (0.46)
Carnac Island (n = 9) 1.41 (0.01) 1.25 (0.01) 0.21 (<) 0.13 (<) 0.14 (<) 0.05 (0.01) 328.03 (0.97)

Presented as mean values across all SNPs; (<), standard error < 0.01; Na, no. of alleles; AE, effective number of alleles; I, information index; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; FIS, fixation index (Wright’s inbreeding coefficient).

The three northern populations, Yanchep, Lake Joondalup and Herdsman Lake, had lower mean body conditions compared to the southern populations (Fig 4). The GLMM (r2 = 0.43) showed no evidence for a significant relationship between individual heterozygosity and body condition (F: 0.51, df; 1, p = 0.48); however, there was a strong effect of site (F: 3.22, df: 5, p = 0.01). A Tukey HSD test found the greatest, and only significant, difference in body condition was between Herdsman Lake and Black Swan Lake snakes (p = 0.03; S1 Table). Of the snakes with body condition data, the inbreeding among loci was significantly different from zero (g2 = 0.025 ± 0.003 S. E., p = 0.01). We found a high correlation between inbreeding level (f) and heterozygosity (r2 = 0.94), strongly suggesting that heterozygosity is a good proxy for inbreeding. Furthermore, we found no correlation between inbreeding level (f) and body condition (r2 = 0.07).

Fig 4. Mean body condition of mainland Notechis scutatus occidentalis populations around Perth, Western Australia.

Fig 4

Body condition is presented as scaled mass index (SMI). gpc, grams per cm; filled diamonds are the population mean; error bars represent 95% confidence intervals; dashed line is mean SMI of 215.7 gpc at the mean population SVL of 757.1 mm; Ho is the mean observed heterozygosity for each population.

Effective population size

We found the largest Ne at Herdsman Lake (95% CI Ne = 152–162), with the smallest effective population size at Black Swan Lake (95% CI Ne = 24–26; Table 3). The effective population size at Kogolup Lake was ‘infinite’, likely due to small sample size preventing calculation of Ne. The r2 –a sample-size bias corrected value of linkage-disequilibrium across all loci pairs–was lower in the northern populations than in the southern populations.

Table 3. Effective population size (Ne) of seven populations of Notechis scutatus occidentalis around Perth, Western Australia.

Site N e Overall r2 Parametric 95% CI
Yanchep 92 0.056 86–99
Lake Joondalup 110 0.053 104–118
Herdsman Lake 156 0.021 152–162
Bibra Lake 84 0.042 82–87
Kogolup Lake INF 0.138 3581–INF
Black Swan Lake 25 0.170 24–26
Carnac Island 90 0.168 82–101

95% CI represent both upper and lower confidence intervals; INF, ‘infinite’, usually a result of not enough information to obtain a reliable estimate. Overall r2 represents a composite measure of average linkage-disequilibrium across all pairs of loci.

Discussion

Regional population structure

Population genomic analysis generally supported our a-priori predictions. At the highest hierarchical level, we identified population clusters that aligned with geographic regions north and south of the Swan/Canning River systems (hereafter the northern and southern cluster). Broadly, our findings reflect the results of Ottewell, Pitt [35], who found that the quenda (Isoodon fusciventer), a small marsupial persisting in Perth bushland patches, showed a similar pattern of genomic differentiation on either side of the major rivers. Although tiger snakes are capable swimmers [67, 68] they are unlikely to swim across the width of the Swan/Canning rivers, and these rivers have likely been historic natural landscape barriers reducing gene flow among tiger snake populations in this region.

Finer-scale patterns identified populations at Herdsman Lake and Carnac Island as being more genetically distinct within these broader clusters, likely due to a combination of genetic drift and isolation. At K = 3, Herdsman Lake is recovered as a distinct cluster, potentially due to isolation from a sea of urban infrastructure; at K = 4, Carnac Island is distinct, likely due to its isolation by 7 km of ocean. We also observed increased genomic distinction in populations reflecting the history and level of surrounding urbanisation. Remnant patches of habitat provide connectivity and allow for persistence of wildlife in urban areas [35, 69]; however, as Western tiger snakes prefer wetland habitats, they are unlikely to disperse through the urban matrix or use remnant vegetation patches without waterways. Consequently, populations persisting in wetland habitats now surrounded by urban infrastructure are essentially fragmented islands.

Within the northern cluster, Joondalup and Yanchep populations were less differentiated than were Joondalup and Herdsman. The Herdsman Lake population is closest to the city centre and has been within the urban footprint for the longest of all our study sites [70], suggesting that urban development has led to reduced gene flow between this population and the remaining northern populations, with resultant isolation and/or genetic drift. Herdsman Lake was naturally an ephemeral swamp, but since the 1850s, it has been subjected to stock grazing, market cropping, and attempted draining for land reclamation until it was finally dredged and modified to be a compensation basin for urban drainage [71, 72]. As Perth’s urban footprint has grown over the last two centuries, tiger snakes may have contracted from the surrounding inter-linking wetlands into the Herdsman Lake reserve. Yanchep and Joondalup wetlands are the northern and southern extremities of the Spearwood Dune System chain of lakes [73], and tiger snakes would have had historic population connectivity along this dune system. Urban development began around Joondalup Lake in the 1970s [70], and based on the current land-use (Fig 1) and our results, the Yanchep and Joondalup wetland populations may still be connected. However, continuing urban development around Joondalup Lake may result in this population developing similar genomic characteristics to the Herdsman Lake population in the near future.

As expected, Bibra and Kogolup lake populations were very closely related. These lakes are part of the Beeliar Regional Park, a chain of wetlands and woodlands currently managed as conservation land [74]. The Beeliar Regional Park is the only remaining connected wetland and woodland ecosystem in the Perth metropolitan area and should provide population connectivity for tiger snakes as long as it remains undeveloped. While there is likely to be some level of mortality due to the presence of arterial roads through the region, it appears there may still be some connectivity between these populations based on the close relationship shared by the Beeliar wetland populations and the Black Swan population.

Interestingly, the southern cluster exhibited a lack of spatial autocorrelation at 12 km, compared to 30 km in the northern cluster. While there appears to be a clear difference in the patterns between subregions, interpreting these differences is difficult without more detailed sampling at intervals of equal distance between populations. This is potentially very difficult to achieve as tiger snakes may not be present at many locations other than those already sampled in this study. The differences may also be partly the result of lower levels of genomic variation present in the northern cluster, with less variation leading to increased spatial autocorrelation of genotypes.

Genomic diversity and health

As predicted, the northern cluster of tiger snakes had lower genomic diversity than the southern cluster, reflecting a similar pattern seen in quenda [35]. Yanchep is near the northern extent of the Western tiger snakes species range (Fig 1). As edge populations often harbour lower diversity than core populations [75], we suspect the relatively low diversity in the northern cluster is probably caused by the Swan/Canning river system isolating populations at the northern edge of the species range from gene flow and increasing genetic drift. Interestingly, genomic diversity was not lowest in the two sites with the highest genomic differentiation and geographic isolation, Herdsman Lake and Carnac Island, suggesting that isolation of ~90–150 years has not increased genetic drift in these populations.

Although none of the studied populations appeared to be strongly inbred, we found that FIS values closely reflected contemporary isolation of populations. For example, Carnac Island is insular and Herdsman Lake is isolated due to urbanisation and showed the highest signal of inbreeding, whereas the study sites with the most habitat connectivity (Yanchep, Kogolup and Black Swan) showed no signal of inbreeding. Inbreeding depression reduces individual fitness, survival and reproduction and can lead to rapid decline and extirpation of populations [17, 20, 76]. Despite small FIS values, population-level changes may not be seen for many generations in longer-lived vertebrates [18, 77]–such as tiger snakes, estimated at 10 years [78]. Thus, we expect to see inbreeding increase through time, especially in sites that become completely isolated from urbanisation.

Phenotypic signatures of inbreeding depression can be measured in wild populations using heterozygosity-fitness correlations. We found a strong correlation between inbreeding (f) and heterozygosity, justifying our use of heterozygosity as a proxy for inbreeding. Our model found no effect of individual genomic heterozygosity on snake body condition, despite the broad pattern of the northern cluster sharing both lower heterozygosity and lower body condition (Fig 4). Body condition is a single measurement of fitness and low heterozygosity can translate to many other measures of fitness such as reduced body size in neonates [34], higher parasitism [79] and reduced survival probability [19]. Populations with low heterozygosity may be experiencing changes in other life history traits that could directly or indirectly affect fitness. Similar to Sovic et al. [52], our results show that body condition was strongly influenced by site. This suggests site-specific environmental stressors such as differences in prey availability [80], anthropogenic disturbance [81] or physiological changes from bioaccumulation of contaminants [32, 82, 83] are probably more important factors than heterozygosity for reducing body condition in tiger snakes from our study sites.

In addition, our use of genome-wide loci, possibly includes many loci in non-coding regions of the genome [84], which would possibly conceal the signal from SNPs under selection. The outlier test identified 131 loci that are potentially influencing fitness in different environments in the Perth region, and these candidate loci can be investigated in future analyses. However, as many traits that contribute to local adaptation are polygenic and may not exhibit high FST values, we suggest that a genotype-environment association analysis would be a better method for investigating adaptive genomic architecture [85, 86]. Further investigation sampling tiger snake populations across their entire distribution–covering a range of native and urban wetland areas–would help identify SNPs that play a role in urban adaptation.

The above results demonstrate that contemporary genomic diversity in Western tiger snakes is more affected by population edge effects in conjunction with historical landscape isolation (Swan/Canning river playing the major role in population isolation and Yanchep at the northern edge experiencing lowered diversity) as opposed to fragmentation and isolation from urbanisation. The health of the northern SCP wetlands are continuously being threatened by anthropogenic water abstraction and climate change [87] in conjunction with ever-encroaching urbanisation [88]. Eventually, the larger urban wetlands (such as Herdsman Lake) will be the only islands of refuge for the northern cluster of tiger snakes. The northern SCP population already shows the lowest genomic diversity–hence adaptive potential–and poorest body condition, and thus is most likely at risk of future extirpation as urbanisation amplifies isolation as well as introducing novel environmental stressors.

Effective population sizes

The largest estimates of Ne came from the largest wetlands: Herdsman and Joondalup Lakes, despite these populations having relatively lower heterozygosity values and positive inbreeding coefficients. In contrast, the Black Swan population (the smallest lake) showed the lowest Ne value despite high genomic diversity and no evidence of inbreeding. Rather than indicating isolation and genetic drift, our Ne estimates appear to reflect the area and quality of available habitat at each locality. Similarly, Wood, Rose [65] found that despite high levels of isolation due to urbanisation, a population of the wetland snake Thamnophis sirtalis tetrataenia had the largest Ne compared to other studied populations, suggesting that habitat restoration and enhancements may have facilitated high adult abundance at this locality. While Fraser, Ironside [89] suspect that large available habitat is responsible for maintaining large population sizes in deer populations isolated by urbanisation. Together, these results suggest that the quality and area of suitable habitat at our sampling sites is driving the effective population sizes of tiger snakes.

The Ne estimate for Kogolup Lake population was infinite, and the lower parametric confidence interval was 3581 (Table 3). As our sample size for that population was n = 10, the infinite estimate is likely due to a small sample size; however, an infinite estimate can also mean there is no evidence for drift in that population, or the Ne is actually large (>1000). Consequently, our dataset is unable to distinguish whether or not the population is ‘very large’. The regional population structure, negative inbreeding coefficients, and current landscape connectivity between Black Swan, Bibra and Kogolup Lakes suggest that together these populations actually represents a broader Beeliar Regional Park meta-population, and we speculate that the infinite Ne estimates could be a result of a large population and therefore not likely to suffer from genetic drift in the near future. Without increasing the sample size and recalculating the effective population size, we cannot confirm this population size. However, if the Kogolup Lake Ne is actually large then the lower bound may provide useful information about plausible Ne estimates [66, 90].

In conservation genetics, small population sizes limit adaptive potential [91]. Specifically, Ne ≥ 100 is recommended to avoid inbreeding depression over the next five generations, while Ne ≥ 1000 is recommended to maintain evolutionary potential; populations below this Ne will suffer a reduced ability to evolve to cope with environmental change over time [63]. Four of our seven study populations are at an Ne <100 (Table 3), and Joondalup and Herdsman lakes were not substantially higher than Ne = 100. Since most of our study populations are already showing signals of inbreeding, are completely isolated, or are in the process of becoming isolated due to urbanisation, ultimately all these populations are at risk of genetic degradation. If Ne is strongly influenced by area and quality of available habitat, then habitat conservation, management and restoration may be the best method to buffer the further loss of genetic diversity in urban island tiger snake populations.

On the origin of Carnac Island snakes

The Carnac Island tiger snakes showed a high level of genetic distinctiveness; this is not surprising given this population lives on an off-shore island. The Carnac Island population, unexpectedly also had the highest level of genomic diversity, and the highest frequency of private alleles (328 compared to 56–111 in mainland populations). For a population that was suspected to be introduced ~ 90 year ago, and shares ancestry with the geographically-closest populations of the southern cluster (Black Swan Lake), this is surprising. Considering the small size of Carnac Island (19 ha), we expected the tiger snake population to show low genomic diversity as island populations are renowned for having lower genetic diversity compared to adjacent mainland populations [9294], even when the island introduction is less than 100 years [76]. A large founding population could have resulted in high heterozygosity [92, 95], however just ~ 40 adult snakes [36] were speculated to have been released on Carnac Island. Maintaining a large population size over time would also be necessary, as extended bottlenecks in the population size would have led to reductions in genetic diversity [95, 96]. It is possible that the founding population was sourced from many genetically diverse populations (e.g. including the east coast subspecies), if that was the case however, we would expect the Carnac Island snakes to separate from our sampled populations at lower K values, and the geographically closest sampled populations to show little-to-no shared ancestry with Carnac Island in our admixture plots.

Surprisingly, we found the Carnac Island population had more than three to five times the private alleles compared to the mainland populations, much more than we would expect from de novo mutations over 90 years of isolation. We propose three hypotheses: (1) the snakes originated from other unsampled populations and the mutations are ancestral; (2) the mutation rates have increased as a response to novel selection pressures [97], since the ecosystem on Carnac Island is very different to the habitat tiger snakes usually prefer on the mainland. This hypothesis could be supported by the phenotypic plasticity shown in the population [24], if epigenetically-driven plasticity has increased genome evolution [98]; or (3) the snakes are a naturally-occurring remnant population that is much older than 90 years, and the mutations are de novo. This hypothesis could be supported by Black Swan Lake’s–the geographically-closest sampled population–shared ancestry, and tiger snakes naturally occurring on the nearby Garden Island [99], historically part of the land-bridge that connected these islands to the mainland roughly 6000 years ago [100].

Conclusions

Urbanisation modifies ecosystems around the world, creating a range of stressors for wildlife living in cities. By investigating population genomic structure of species persisting in urban environments, we can gain useful information for conservation management of urban wildlife. Here, we genotyped urban and peri-urban populations of tiger snakes with the aim of understanding natural and anthropogenic influences on genomic diversity and population connectivity. We found that the major river system that runs through our urban study area has been a strong historical barrier to gene flow, resulting in the partial isolation of populations to the north of the river from the remainder of the species distribution. These northern populations also exhibited lower genomic diversity and lower body condition than southern populations, suggesting that they are most at risk of extirpation as urbanisation further encroaches upon their sensitive wetland habitats. As we expected, the populations most exposed to isolation–both geographic and urban–showed the strongest signal of inbreeding, although the maintenance of large effective population sizes appears to be driven primarily by the amount of available habitat. Together, these findings suggest that that increasing population connectivity and maximising the area of habitat in urban areas will help improve the adaptive capacity of urban wildlife. We also recommend further investigation into the genomic architecture of adaptation to urbanisation in this species, which will improve our understanding of the genetic and physiological pathways by which species adapt to urban environments.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Hierarchical clustering dendrogram representing genetic distance relationships between Notechis scutatus occidentalis populations around Perth, Western Australia.

Calculated using 4688 single-nucleotide polymorphisms from across the genome. Note that these relationships do not necessarily reflect a true phylogeny.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Cross-entropy scree plot used to identify hierarchical population structuring in the genomic dataset for Notechis scutatus occidentalis.

Lower values of the cross-entropy criterion indicate a better fit to the data.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Admixture bar plot comparing population structure in Notechis scutatus occidentalis from Perth, Western Australia.

Each tick mark on the x-axis represents an individual snake, which are grouped by sampling locations. The dashed line represents the biogeographic barrier of the Swan/Canning Rivers separating the northern and southern sampling localities. The y-axis represents the fraction of individuals’ genome that originates from a particular ancestral population, each of which has been given a unique colour.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Spatial autocorrelation of multilocus genotypes for Notechis scutatus occidentalis from Perth, Western Australia at five distance classes.

Cluster indicates the population used for analysis. Global is all mainland snakes, Northern and Southern are the populations either side of the Swan/Canning River system. The probability value at each distance class shows the proportion of permuted r values greater than the observed value in that distance class, based on 999 permutations of the SNP by sample matrix.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Hierarchical population genomic structure of Notechis scutatus occidentalis around Perth, Western Australia.

Unique colours in each panel represent an ancestral cluster. Black points indicate sampling sites. The dashed line represents the Swan/Canning River systems, while the dashed ring outlines Carnac and Garden Islands.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Tukey HSD pairwise post-hoc test comparing body condition among six populations of Notechis scutatus occidentalis around Perth, Western Australia.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Jordan Vos, Kady Grosser, Serin Subaraj, Olimpia Cercora and Aleesha Turner for volunteering their time to help collect tissues for this project. We also pay respects to the traditional owners of the land, the Whadjuk-Noongar people, where this research was conducted.

Data Availability

The data is stored in the public database BioStudies, reference:S-BSST646. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-BSST646. Data includes:Morphological data and individual heterozygosities for all snakes without food, Raw SNP data for all snakes used in analysis, as provided by DARTseq, and site and coordinates of each snake used in analysis. Data will be available upon publication.

Funding Statement

DCL received funding for this research from the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment, https://www.ecolsoc.org.au/awards/holsworth/. VAT received funding for this research from the Australian Research Council, LP160100189 and DE180100624, https://www.arc.gov.au/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Vlahov D, Galea S. Urbanization, urbanicity, and health. J Urban Health. 2002;79(4 Suppl 1):S1–S12. Epub 2002/12/11. doi: 10.1093/jurban/79.suppl_1.s1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kristan WB, Boarman WI, Crayon JJ. Diet composition of common ravens across the urban-wildland interface of the West Mojave Desert. Wildl Soc Bull. 2004;32(1):244–53. doi: 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[244:Dcocra]2.0.Co;2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rodriguez Martin JA, De Arana C, Ramos-Miras JJ, Gil C, Boluda R. Impact of 70 years urban growth associated with heavy metal pollution. Environ Pollut. 2015;196:156–63. Epub 2014/12/03. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.10.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Luo W, Su L, Craig NJ, Du F, Wu C, Shi H. Comparison of microplastic pollution in different water bodies from urban creeks to coastal waters. Environ Pollut. 2019;246:174–82. Epub 2018/12/14. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.081 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bower DS, Valentine LE, Grice AC, Hodgson L, Schwarzkopf L. A trade-off in conservation: Weed management decreases the abundance of common reptile and frog species while restoring an invaded floodplain. Biol Conserv. 2014;179:123–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Newbery B, Jones DN. Presence of Asian house gecko Hemidactylus frenatus across an urban gradient in Brisbane: influence of habitat and potential for impact on native gecko species. Pest or guest: the zoology of overabundance. 2007:59–65. doi: 10.1094/PD-91-0059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Doherty TS, Hays GC, Driscoll DA. Human disturbance causes widespread disruption of animal movement. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021;5(4):513–9. Epub 2021/02/03. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-01380-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murray MH, Sánchez CA, Becker DJ, Byers KA, Worsley‐Tonks KEL, Craft ME. City sicker? A meta‐analysis of wildlife health and urbanization. Front Ecol Environ. 2019;17(10):575–83. doi: 10.1002/fee.2126 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rivkin LR, Santangelo JS, Alberti M, Aronson MFJ, de Keyzer CW, Diamond SE, et al. A roadmap for urban evolutionary ecology. Evol Appl. 2019;12(3):384–98. Epub 2019/03/05. doi: 10.1111/eva.12734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Miranda AC. Mechanisms of behavioural change in urban animals: the role of microevolution and phenotypic plasticity. Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments: Springer; 2017. p. 113–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK. Adaptation and Adaptedness of Organisms to Urban Environments. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S. 2015;46:261–80. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054258 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bryant GL, Kobryn HT, Hardy GES, Fleming PA. Habitat islands in a sea of urbanisation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2017;28:131–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wodkiewicz M, Gruszczynska B. Genetic Diversity and Spatial Genetic Structure of Stellaria Holostea Populations from Urban Forest Islands. Acta Biol Cracov Bot. 2014;56(1):42–53. doi: 10.2478/abcsb-2014-0004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fusco NA, Carlen EJ, Munshi-South J. Urban Landscape Genetics: Are Biologists Keeping Up with the Pace of Urbanization? Current Landscape Ecology Reports. 2021;6:35–45. doi: 10.1007/s40823-021-00062-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Macdonald DW, Salazar RD, Eynard SE, Rogers A, Coles RS, Montgomery RA. The Genetic Differentiation of Common Toads on UK Farmland: The Effect of Straight-Line (Euclidean) Distance and Isolation by Barriers in a Heterogeneous Environment. J Herpetol. 2020;54(1):118–24. doi: 10.1670/19-039 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miles LS, Rivkin LR, Johnson MTJ, Munshi-South J, Verrelli BC. Gene flow and genetic drift in urban environments. Mol Ecol. 2019;28(18):4138–51. Epub 2019/09/05. doi: 10.1111/mec.15221 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Madsen T, Stille B, Shine R. Inbreeding depression in an isolated population of adders Vipera berus. Biol Conserv. 1996;75(2):113–8. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00067-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Keyghobadi N. The genetic implications of habitat fragmentation for animals. Can J Zool. 2007;85(10):1049–64. doi: 10.1139/Z07-095 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Johansson M, Primmer CR, Merilä J. Does habitat fragmentation reduce fitness and adaptability? A case study of the common frog (Rana temporaria). Mol Ecol. 2007;16(13):2693–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03357.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hedrick PW, Garcia-Dorado A. Understanding Inbreeding Depression, Purging, and Genetic Rescue. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016;31(12):940–52. Epub 2016/10/17. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reed DH, Frankham R. Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol. 2003;17(1):230–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01236.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Davis JA, Froend R. Loss and degradation of wetlands in southwestern Australia: underlying causes, consequences and solutions. Wetlands Ecol Manage. 1999;7(1–2):13–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wilson SK, Swan G. A complete guide to reptiles of Australia. 5 ed: New Holland Publishers; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aubret F. Island colonisation and the evolutionary rates of body size in insular neonate snakes. Heredity. 2015;115(4):349–56. Epub 2014/07/31. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Softly A. Necessity for perpetuation of a venomous snake. Biol Conserv. 1971;4(1):40–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shea GM. The suburban terrestrial reptile fauna of Sydney-winners and losers. The natural history of Sydney. 2010:154–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bauerle B, Spencer DL, Wheeler W. The Use of Snakes as a Pollution Indicator Species. Copeia. 1975;1975(2):366–8. doi: 10.2307/1442893 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Beaupre SJ, Douglas LE. Snakes as indicators and monitors of ecosystem properties. Snakes: ecology and conservation: Cornell University Press; 2009. p. 244–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Haskins DL, Brown MK, Bringolf RB, Tuberville TD. Brown watersnakes (Nerodia taxispilota) as bioindicators of mercury contamination in a riverine system. Sci Total Environ. 2021;755(Pt 2):142545. Epub 2020/10/11. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142545 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lettoof DC, Bateman PW, Aubret F, Gagnon MM. The Broad-Scale Analysis of Metals, Trace Elements, Organochlorine Pesticides and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Wetlands Along an Urban Gradient, and the Use of a High Trophic Snake as a Bioindicator. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2020;78(4):631–45. Epub 2020/03/04. doi: 10.1007/s00244-020-00724-z . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lettoof DC, Lohr MT, Busetti F, Bateman PW, Davis RA. Toxic time bombs: Frequent detection of anticoagulant rodenticides in urban reptiles at multiple trophic levels. Sci Total Environ. 2020;724:138218. Epub 2020/04/05. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138218 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lettoof DC, Rankenburg K, McDonald BJ, Evans NJ, Bateman PW, Aubret F, et al. Snake scales record environmental metal(loid) contamination. Environ Pollut. 2021;274:116547. Epub 2021/02/07. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116547 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gibbs HL, Chiucchi JE. Inbreeding, body condition, and heterozygosity-fitness correlations in isolated populations of the endangered eastern massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus c. catenatus). Conserv Genet. 2012;13(4):1133–43. doi: 10.1007/s10592-012-0360-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Moss JB, Gerber GP, Welch ME. Heterozygosity-Fitness Correlations Reveal Inbreeding Depression in Neonatal Body Size in a Critically Endangered Rock Iguana. J Hered. 2019;110(7):818–29. Epub 2019/10/17. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esz060 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ottewell K, Pitt G, Pellegrino B, Van Dongen R, Kinloch J, Willers N, et al. Remnant vegetation provides genetic connectivity for a critical weight range mammal in a rapidly urbanising landscape. Landsc Urban Plan. 2019;190:103587. ARTN 103587 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103587 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ladyman M, Seubert E, Bradshaw D. The origin of tiger snakes on Carnac Island. J R Soc West Aust. 2020;103:39–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Michael D, Clemann N, Robertson P. Notechis scutatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018: e.T169687A83767147 2018 [Downloaded on 13 September 2021].
  • 38.Kilian A, Wenzl P, Huttner E, Carling J, Xia L, Blois H, et al. Diversity arrays technology: a generic genome profiling technology on open platforms. Data production and analysis in population genomics: Springer; 2012. p. 67–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Melville J, Haines ML, Boysen K, Hodkinson L, Kilian A, Smith Date KL, et al. Identifying hybridization and admixture using SNPs: application of the DArTseq platform in phylogeographic research on vertebrates. R Soc Open Sci. 2017;4(7):161061. Epub 2017/08/10. doi: 10.1098/rsos.161061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sansaloni C, Petroli C, Jaccoud D, Carling J, Detering F, Grattapaglia D, et al., editors. Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) and next-generation sequencing combined: genome-wide, high throughput, highly informative genotyping for molecular breeding of Eucalyptus. BMC proceedings; 2011: BioMed Central. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Price AL, Weale ME, Patterson N, Myers SR, Need AC, Shianna KV, et al. Long-range LD can confound genome scans in admixed populations. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2008;83(1):132–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.06.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Goudet J, Kay T, Weir BS. How to estimate kinship. Mol Ecol. 2018;27(20):4121–35. Epub 2018/08/15. doi: 10.1111/mec.14833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Goudet J. HIERFSTAT, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol Ecol Notes. 2005;5(1):184–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00828.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kamvar ZN, Tabima JF, Grünwald NJ. Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ. 2014;2:e281. doi: 10.7717/peerj.281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Winter DJ. MMOD: an R library for the calculation of population differentiation statistics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2012;12(6):1158–60. Epub 2012/08/14. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03174.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pembleton LW, Cogan NO, Forster JW. StAMPP: an R package for calculation of genetic differentiation and structure of mixed-ploidy level populations. Mol Ecol Resour. 2013;13(5):946–52. Epub 2013/06/07. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12129 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Caye K, Deist TM, Martins H, Michel O, Francois O. TESS3: fast inference of spatial population structure and genome scans for selection. Mol Ecol Resour. 2016;16(2):540–8. Epub 2015/09/30. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12471 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Caye K, Jay F, Michel O, Francois O. Fast Inference of Individual Admixture Coefficients Using Geographic Data. Annals of Applied Statistics. 2018;12(1):586–608. doi: 10.1214/17-Aoas1106 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Narum SR, Hess JE. Comparison of F(ST) outlier tests for SNP loci under selection. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11 Suppl 1(s1):184–94. Epub 2011/04/01. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.02987.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6(1):288–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(19):2537–9. Epub 2012/07/24. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sovic M, Fries A, Martin SA, Lisle Gibbs H. Genetic signatures of small effective population sizes and demographic declines in an endangered rattlesnake, Sistrurus catenatus. Evol Appl. 2019;12(4):664–78. Epub 2019/04/13. doi: 10.1111/eva.12731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gkafas GA, de Jong M, Exadactylos A, Raga JA, Aznar FJ, Hoelzel AR. Sex-specific impact of inbreeding on pathogen load in the striped dolphin. Proc Biol Sci. 2020;287(1922):20200195. Epub 2020/03/12. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Madsen T, Shine R. Short and chubby or long and slim? Food intake, growth and body condition in free-ranging pythons. Austral Ecol. 2002;27(6):672–80. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2002.01228.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Weatherhead PJ, Brown PJ. Measurement versus estimation of condition in snakes. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie. 1996;74(9):1617–21. doi: 10.1139/z96-179 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Peig J, Green AJ. New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos. 2009;118(12):1883–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17643.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Peig J, Green AJ. The paradigm of body condition: a critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length. Funct Ecol. 2010;24(6):1323–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01751.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Doran H, Bliese P, Bates D, Dowling M. Estimating the multilevel Rasch model: with the lme4 package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2007;20(2):74.: 000247010700001. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.David P, Pujol B, Viard F, Castella V, Goudet J. Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data. Mol Ecol. 2007;16(12):2474–87. Epub 2007/06/15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03330.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Stoffel MA, Esser M, Kardos M, Humble E, Nichols H, David P, et al. inbreedR: an R package for the analysis of inbreeding based on genetic markers. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2016;7(11):1331–9. doi: 10.1111/2041-210x.12588 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931;16(2):97–159. Epub 1931/03/01. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Luikart G, Ryman N, Tallmon DA, Schwartz MK, Allendorf FW. Estimation of census and effective population sizes: the increasing usefulness of DNA-based approaches. Conserv Genet. 2010;11(2):355–73. doi: 10.1007/s10592-010-0050-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Frankham R, Bradshaw CJA, Brook BW. Genetics in conservation management: Revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses. Biol Conserv. 2014;170:56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Frankham R. How closely does genetic diversity in finite populations conform to predictions of neutral theory? Large deficits in regions of low recombination. Heredity (Edinb). 2012;108(3):167–78. Epub 2011/09/01. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2011.66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wood DA, Rose JP, Halstead BJ, Stoelting RE, Swaim KE, Vandergast AG. Combining genetic and demographic monitoring better informs conservation of an endangered urban snake. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(5):e0231744. Epub 2020/05/06. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231744 the years 2005–2015 that were provided as an in-kind service and these tissues were utilized in this study. Site data from a previously published study [35], which was partially funded by Swaim Biological, Inc, were also used in the present study. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Do C, Waples RS, Peel D, Macbeth GM, Tillett BJ, Ovenden JR. NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014;14(1):209–14. Epub 2013/09/03. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12157 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cornelis J, Lettoof DC. Notechis scutatus occidentalis (Western tiger snake) defensive behavior. Herpetol Rev. 2020;51(3):623–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Aubret F, Bonnet X, Maumelat S. Tail loss, body condition and swimming performances in tiger snakes, Notechis ater occidentalis. J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol. 2005;303(10):894–903. Epub 2005/09/15. doi: 10.1002/jez.a.218 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Angold PG, Sadler JP, Hill MO, Pullin A, Rushton S, Austin K, et al. Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Sci Total Environ. 2006;360(1–3):196–204. Epub 2005/11/22. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.035 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kelobonye K, Xia JC, Swapan MSH, McCarney G, Zhou H. Drivers of Change in Urban Growth Patterns: A Transport Perspective from Perth, Western Australia. Urban Science. 2019;3(2):40. ARTN 40 doi: 10.3390/urbansci3020040 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Clarke K, Davis J, Murray F. Herdsman Lake water quality study. Perth, Australia: Murdoch University, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gentilli J, Bekle H. History of the Perth lakes. Early Days: Journal of the Royal Western Australian Historical Society. 1993;10(5):442. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.CALM, Dooley B. Yellagonga Regional Park: management plan, 2003–2013: Department of Conservation and Land Management; 2003.
  • 74.Dooley B, Bowra T, Strano P, Davis I, Murray R, McGowan J. Beeliar Regional Park-Final Management Plan. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Perth, Western Australia. 2006.
  • 75.De Kort H, Prunier JG, Ducatez S, Honnay O, Baguette M, Stevens VM, et al. Life history, climate and biogeography interactively affect worldwide genetic diversity of plant and animal populations. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):516. Epub 2021/01/24. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20958-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hedrick PW, Peterson RO, Vucetich LM, Adams JR, Vucetich JA. Genetic rescue in Isle Royale wolves: genetic analysis and the collapse of the population. Conserv Genet. 2014;15(5):1111–21. doi: 10.1007/s10592-014-0604-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kuussaari M, Bommarco R, Heikkinen RK, Helm A, Krauss J, Lindborg R, et al. Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24(10):564–71. Epub 2009/08/12. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.04.011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ludington AJ, Sanders KL. Demographic analyses of marine and terrestrial snakes (Elapidae) using whole genome sequences. Mol Ecol. 2021;30(2):545–54. 10.1111/mec.15726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Shaner PJ, Chen YR, Lin JW, Kolbe JJ, Lin SM. Sex-specific correlations of individual heterozygosity, parasite load, and scalation asymmetry in a sexually dichromatic lizard. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e56720. Epub 2013/03/02. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zipkin EF, DiRenzo GV, Ray JM, Rossman S, Lips KR. Tropical snake diversity collapses after widespread amphibian loss. Science. 2020;367(6479):814–6. Epub 2020/02/15. doi: 10.1126/science.aay5733 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lomas E, Larsen KW, Bishop CA. Persistence of Northern Pacific Rattlesnakes masks the impact of human disturbance on weight and body condition. Anim Conserv. 2015;18(6):548–56. doi: 10.1111/acv.12208 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Takekawa JY, Wainwright-De La Cruz SE, Hothem RL, Yee J. Relating body condition to inorganic contaminant concentrations of diving ducks wintering in coastal California. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2002;42(1):60–70. Epub 2001/11/14. doi: 10.1007/s002440010292 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Lettoof DC, Aubret F, Spilsbury F, Bateman PW, Haberfield J, Vos J, et al. Plasma Biochemistry Profiles of Wild Western Tiger Snakes (Notechis Scutatus Occidentalis) before and after Six Months of Captivity. J Wildl Dis. 2021;57(2):253–63. Epub 2021/04/07. doi: 10.7589/JWD-D-20-00115 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.von Takach B, Ahrens CW, Lindenmayer DB, Banks SC. Scale-dependent signatures of local adaptation in a foundation tree species. Mol Ecol. 2021;30(10):2248–61. Epub 2021/03/20. doi: 10.1111/mec.15894 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kemper KE, Saxton SJ, Bolormaa S, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Selection for complex traits leaves little or no classic signatures of selection. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):1–14. Artn 246 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Berg JJ, Coop G. A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(8):e1004412. Epub 2014/08/08. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Semeniuk CA, Semeniuk V. The response of basin wetlands to climate changes: a review of case studies from the Swan Coastal Plain, south-western Australia. Hydrobiologia. 2013;708(1):45–67. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1161-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.MacLachlan A, Biggs E, Roberts G, Boruff B. Urban Growth Dynamics in Perth, Western Australia: Using Applied Remote Sensing for Sustainable Future Planning. Land. 2017;6(1):9. ARTN 9 doi: 10.3390/land6010009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Fraser DL, Ironside K, Wayne RK, Boydston EE. Connectivity of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) populations in a highly fragmented urban landscape. Landsc Ecol. 2019;34(5):1097–115. doi: 10.1007/s10980-019-00824-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Waples RS, Do C. Linkage disequilibrium estimates of contemporary N e using highly variable genetic markers: a largely untapped resource for applied conservation and evolution. Evol Appl. 2010;3(3):244–62. Epub 2010/05/01. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00104.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hoffmann AA, Sgro CM, Kristensen TN. Revisiting Adaptive Potential, Population Size, and Conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2017;32(7):506–17. Epub 2017/05/10. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Clegg SM, Degnan SM, Kikkawa J, Moritz C, Estoup A, Owens IP. Genetic consequences of sequential founder events by an island-colonizing bird. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(12):8127–32. Epub 2002/05/30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.102583399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Frankham R. Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity. 1997;78(3):311–27. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1997.46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Suezawa R, Nikadori H, Sasaki S. Genetic diversity and genomic inbreeding in Japanese Black cows in the islands of Okinawa Prefecture evaluated using single‐nucleotide polymorphism array. Anim Sci J. 2021;92(1):e13525. doi: 10.1111/asj.13525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Kaňuch P, Berggren Å, Cassel-Lundhagen A. A clue to invasion success: genetic diversity quickly rebounds after introduction bottlenecks. Biol Invasions. 2020;23(4):1141–56. doi: 10.1007/s10530-020-02426-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Nelson SL, Taylor SA, Reuter JD. An isolated white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) population on St. John, US Virgin Islands shows low inbreeding and comparable heterozygosity to other larger populations. Ecol Evol. 2021;11(6):2775–81. Epub 2021/03/27. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ, Johnson T, Shaver A. The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences. Bioessays. 2000;22(12):1057–66. Epub 2000/11/21. doi: 10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12&lt;1057::AID-BIES3&gt;3.0.CO;2-W . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Ashe A, Colot V, Oldroyd BP. How does epigenetics influence the course of evolution? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021;376(1826):20200111. Epub 2021/04/20. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Pearson D, Shine R, Williams A. Geographic variation in sexual size dimorphism within a single snake species (Morelia spilota, Pythonidae). Oecologia. 2002;131(3):418–26. Epub 2002/05/01. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0917-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Playford P. Geological research on Rottnest Island. J R Soc West Aust. 1983;66(1–2):10–5. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Randeep Singh

10 Sep 2021

PONE-D-21-24399Top predator snake shows genomic signatures of natural and anthropogenic barriers to gene flowPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Lettoof,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 25 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Randeep Singh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional location information about your sampling sites, including geographic coordinates for the data set if available.

3. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

4. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

 a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

 b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. ORIGINAL SUBMISSION

1.1. Recommendation Accepted with minor revision

2. COMMENTS TO AUTHOR

Authors: Damian C. Lettoof, Vicki A. Thomson, Jari Cornelis, Philip W. Bateman, Fabien Aubret, Marthe M. Gagnon, Brenton von Takach

Title: Top predator snake shows genomic signatures of natural and anthropogenic barriers to gene flow

2.1. Overview and general recommendation:

This study describes the effects of urbanization on tiger snakes using population genomics around the Perth region in Australia to access and inform conservation strategies. For this study, the authors used RAD-associated SNPs to evaluate the genetic structure among populations of Notechis scutatus occidentalis of different localities along with its distribution. This article is well-written, with a few issues related to interpretation that need to be considered. Therefore, I accepted this manuscript for publication, but with minor revision. Please, find below my comments and consideration of this manuscript.

I think that the results about the genetic distance among populations are over-interpreted. Although Carnac has the greatest genetic distance among other populations (0.40-0.29), the genetic distance between Carnac and Black Swan/Kogolup is moderate (0.29). Also, it is moderate when the genetic distance is compared among distant populations, for example, Yanchep and Black Swan (0.26). So, I conclude that the genetic distance among populations is not high but moderate to low, and they are not entirely isolated.

About the investigation of the cross-entropy scree plot produced using the tess3r package, in Figure 3, I do not see the plot of K=4 in the figure. I just saw the plot of K=2 to K=3. Where is this plot (K=4)? In Figure S3, I just saw the plot of K=5 to K=7. Also, in Figure 3 and Figure S3, I suggest that the south and north lakes should be indicated in these figures because it is tough to understand what the authors present in results and what they have shown in these figures.

Also, following the cross-validation interpretation, to choose the best K, in Figure S2, the author said in Materials and Methods: “We considered ancestry coefficients for K values of 2, 3 and 4 as these values showed the largest improvements in cross-entropy, with K = 4 showing a substantial change in slope, and plotted these for each individual”.

In the manual of tess3r they mentioned: “The best choice for the K value is when the cross-validation curve exhibits a plateau or starts increasing… Be cautious about over-interpreting the value of K and the folkore around the choice of this value. Population structure is often hierarchical, and the estimation of K strongly depends on sampling and genotyping efforts. The number of genetic groups detected by ancestry estimation programs does not necessarily correspond to the number of biologically meaningful populations in the sample (Francois and Durand 2010). If I am correct, following the Figure S2 the best K in your analysis is K=4 to K=6, so why you choose K=2 to K=4?

Also, the author mentioned, “At K=3, Herdsman Lake is recovered as a distinct cluster, potentially due to isolation from a sea of urban infrastructure”. I do not see this in figure 3, I see a strong differentiation, but I see that there is gene flow with other populations. I suggest that the authors use additional analysis to see gene flow, as Ima2 and FastSimCoal. Also, the author can use Estimated Effective Migration Surface analysis (EEMS); in this analysis, you can see the landscape and the genetic structure among populations. Also, you can evaluate some geographic barriers that can explain the population structure.

Reviewer #2: A comprehensive study that makes important theoretical contributions as well as using its data to guide management action for conservation.

I have only minor comments to make.

Line 2: "Top predator" probably not justifiable, nor necessary in title, or elsewhere in the MS. No evidence that tiger snakes are top or apex predators is presented in the MS or cited references. Seems to just be words added to colour the MS.

Line 19: Abstract. Discovery of the much greater than predicted heterozygosity on Carnac was not an aim of the study but becomes a significant finding. It should be mentioned in the Abstract.

Line 30: why the quotes around ‘fitness’?

Line 95: Study Sites and Sample Collection. In this section could the authors comment on the unevenness of the sampling at the different sites? Low samples at some sites could reflect low population numbers, but other factors such as snake detectability, habitat complexity or access could also influence sampling. This unevenness, leading to potential population underestimates, could then be part of the potential set of explanations for differences between sites.

This topic could be part of the Discussion around population size estimates in lines 429-450

Line 202: again, why the quotes?

Line 383: isolated due to urbanisation

Line 390: and reduced survival probability

Line 425-26: incomplete sentence: While Fraser, Ironside….habitat.

Line 439: typo: Kogolup

Lines 466-67: Awkward sentence structure – needs rewrite.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 29;16(10):e0259124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259124.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 0


22 Sep 2021

Reviewer 1

I think that the results about the genetic distance among populations are over-interpreted. Although Carnac has the greatest genetic distance among other populations (0.40-0.29), the genetic distance between Carnac and Black Swan/Kogolup is moderate (0.29). Also, it is moderate when the genetic distance is compared among distant populations, for example, Yanchep and Black Swan (0.26). So, I conclude that the genetic distance among populations is not high but moderate to low, and they are not entirely isolated.

These values are not genetic distance, they are genetic differentiation (based on G″ST, an FST analogue). As the number of migrants strongly influences the level of differentiation, we can conclude that the population with the highest level of differentiation from other populations is likely to be the most isolated. We suggest that a differentiation value of 0.4 indicates quite strong isolation from other populations. However, we agree that we can express the results in a more communicable fashion, and have now revised the relevant paragraph in the Results section to state:

“Carnac Island was the most differentiated from other populations (pairwise G″ST = 0.29–0.40). The most geographically distant pair of sites, Yanchep and Black Swan, exhibited a moderate level of differentiation (G″ST = 0.26).”

About the investigation of the cross-entropy scree plot produced using the tess3r package, in Figure 3, I do not see the plot of K=4 in the figure. I just saw the plot of K=2 to K=3. Where is this plot (K=4)? In Figure S3, I just saw the plot of K=5 to K=7. Also, in Figure 3 and Figure S3, I suggest that the south and north lakes should be indicated in these figures because it is tough to understand what the authors present in results and what they have shown in these figures.

We accidently submitted the old figure with incorrect labelling. Fig 3 shows K2, 3 & 4. We have attached the correct version, and added additional labels clarifying the populations north/south of the rivers. We also state in the figure caption that the dashed line is the divide between north/south populations.

Also, following the cross-validation interpretation, to choose the best K, in Figure S2, the author said in Materials and Methods: “We considered ancestry coefficients for K values of 2, 3 and 4 as these values showed the largest improvements in cross-entropy, with K = 4 showing a substantial change in slope, and plotted these for each individual”.

In the manual of tess3r they mentioned: “The best choice for the K value is when the cross-validation curve exhibits a plateau or starts increasing… Be cautious about over-interpreting the value of K and the folkore around the choice of this value. Population structure is often hierarchical, and the estimation of K strongly depends on sampling and genotyping efforts. The number of genetic groups detected by ancestry estimation programs does not necessarily correspond to the number of biologically meaningful populations in the sample (Francois and Durand 2010). If I am correct, following the Figure S2 the best K in your analysis is K=4 to K=6, so why you choose K=2 to K=4?

With large genomic datasets utilising thousands of SNPs, the K value with the lowest cross-entropy is typically the same value as the overall number of sampling localities, as we have the power to identify even fine-scale differentiation among geographically close sites. This is not very informative because it doesn’t group populations into ancestral clusters or allow for inference of meaningful population structure across the landscape. A large drop in cross-entropy implies a big improvement in the explanation of genetic structure and so is useful for inference about higher levels of the hierarchy. We have now reworded the relevant paragraph of the Materials and Methods section to improve our explanation of the method, which now reads:

“The ‘tess3’ function incorporates the latitudes and longitudes of each sampled individual to account for the influence of isolation-by-distance on ancestry coefficients, with large drops or plateaus in the scree plot identifying useful values of K for inference of population genetic structure (Fig S2). We considered K values of 2, 3 and 4 most useful for describing the high-level genetic structure across the region, as these values showed the largest reductions in cross-entropy, with a plateau starting to form at K > 4. For finer-scale investigation of population structuring we also plotted ancestry coefficients of K = 5, 6 and 7 (Fig S3).”

Also, the author mentioned, “At K=3, Herdsman Lake is recovered as a distinct cluster, potentially due to isolation from a sea of urban infrastructure”. I do not see this in figure 3, I see a strong differentiation, but I see that there is gene flow with other populations. I suggest that the authors use additional analysis to see gene flow, as Ima2 and FastSimCoal. Also, the author can use Estimated Effective Migration Surface analysis (EEMS); in this analysis, you can see the landscape and the genetic structure among populations. Also, you can evaluate some geographic barriers that can explain the population structure.

Our apologies for inserting an old figure. The reviewer was thus interpreting these findings on K=2, not K=3. The new figure should improve understanding in this regard. To address the issue of visualising the pattern of population structure across the landscape, we have now included maps of the ancestry coefficients output from tess3r, for K values of 2 to 6, in the Supplementary Material. We believe this adequately allows readers to visually identify barriers to gene flow.

Reviewer 2

Line 2: "Top predator" probably not justifiable, nor necessary in title, or elsewhere in the MS. No evidence that tiger snakes are top or apex predators is presented in the MS or cited references. Seems to just be words added to colour the MS.

Although there is no formal study quantifying the trophic tier for tiger snakes in Australia, they are well recognised by herpetolologists - including very experienced authors of this MS – as not, or rarely, suffering predation once they attain adult size. This is supported by the lack of adult predation records in the literature. As an alternative, we propose changing the phrase in the title to “Bioindicator snake” – as there are currently six publications justifying the use of tiger snakes as bioindicators (see Lettoof, D. C. et al.).

Line 19: Abstract. Discovery of the much greater than predicted heterozygosity on Carnac was not an aim of the study but becomes a significant finding. It should be mentioned in the Abstract.

Our abstract is currently at the word limit and we believe it adequately summarises the key findings. Although the Carnac discovery was interesting, it was not a primary focus of the MS and we cannot describe the findings – with appropriate context – in an already filled abstract.

Line 30: why the quotes around ‘fitness’?

We have removed these quotes.

Line 95: Study Sites and Sample Collection. In this section could the authors comment on the unevenness of the sampling at the different sites? Low samples at some sites could reflect low population numbers, but other factors such as snake detectability, habitat complexity or access could also influence sampling. This unevenness, leading to potential population underestimates, could then be part of the potential set of explanations for differences between sites.

This topic could be part of the Discussion around population size estimates in lines 429-450

Kogolup, Black Swan and Carnac Island were opportunistically sampled to add sites to this study, and received less survey effort than Herdsman, Joondalup, Bibra and Yanchep. We are confident that our detection ability in catchers was the same at every site, but the lower sample size was related to survey effort. We have added a sentence in the method to clarify “Kogolup Lake, Black Swan Lake and Carnac Island were surveyed less than the other sites (a few days compared with several weeks), which resulted in lower sample sizes for these sites.”

Line 202: again, why the quotes?

We have removed these quotes.

Line 383: isolated due to urbanisation

We have amended this sentence.

Line 390: and reduced survival probability

We have added ‘reduced’.

Line 425-26: incomplete sentence: While Fraser, Ironside….habitat.

We have restructured the sentence to “While Fraser, Ironside (88) suspect that large available habitat is responsible for maintaining large population sizes in deer populations isolated by urbanisation.”

Line 439: typo: Kogolup

Amended.

Lines 466-67: Awkward sentence structure – needs rewrite.

We have rewritten to “It is possible that the founding population was sourced from many genetically diverse populations (e.g. including the east coast subspecies), if that was the case however, we would expect the Carnac Island snakes to separate from our sampled populations at lower K values, and the geographically closest sampled populations to show little-to-no shared ancestry with Carnac Island in our admixture plots.”

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Randeep Singh

13 Oct 2021

Bioindicator snake shows genomic signatures of natural and anthropogenic barriers to gene flow

PONE-D-21-24399R1

Dear Damian ,,

In the manuscript authors have fairly done the good work and have scientific merit. My suggestions is to accept the manuscript after incorporating the suggestions.

Kind regards,

Randeep Singh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

In the manuscript authors have fairly done the good work and have merit. My suggestions is to accept the manuscript after incorporating the suggestions.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Randeep Singh

21 Oct 2021

PONE-D-21-24399R1

Bioindicator snake shows genomic signatures of natural and anthropogenic barriers to gene flow

Dear Dr. Lettoof:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Randeep Singh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Hierarchical clustering dendrogram representing genetic distance relationships between Notechis scutatus occidentalis populations around Perth, Western Australia.

    Calculated using 4688 single-nucleotide polymorphisms from across the genome. Note that these relationships do not necessarily reflect a true phylogeny.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Cross-entropy scree plot used to identify hierarchical population structuring in the genomic dataset for Notechis scutatus occidentalis.

    Lower values of the cross-entropy criterion indicate a better fit to the data.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Admixture bar plot comparing population structure in Notechis scutatus occidentalis from Perth, Western Australia.

    Each tick mark on the x-axis represents an individual snake, which are grouped by sampling locations. The dashed line represents the biogeographic barrier of the Swan/Canning Rivers separating the northern and southern sampling localities. The y-axis represents the fraction of individuals’ genome that originates from a particular ancestral population, each of which has been given a unique colour.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Spatial autocorrelation of multilocus genotypes for Notechis scutatus occidentalis from Perth, Western Australia at five distance classes.

    Cluster indicates the population used for analysis. Global is all mainland snakes, Northern and Southern are the populations either side of the Swan/Canning River system. The probability value at each distance class shows the proportion of permuted r values greater than the observed value in that distance class, based on 999 permutations of the SNP by sample matrix.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Hierarchical population genomic structure of Notechis scutatus occidentalis around Perth, Western Australia.

    Unique colours in each panel represent an ancestral cluster. Black points indicate sampling sites. The dashed line represents the Swan/Canning River systems, while the dashed ring outlines Carnac and Garden Islands.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Tukey HSD pairwise post-hoc test comparing body condition among six populations of Notechis scutatus occidentalis around Perth, Western Australia.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLOS One reviewer responses.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The data is stored in the public database BioStudies, reference:S-BSST646. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-BSST646. Data includes:Morphological data and individual heterozygosities for all snakes without food, Raw SNP data for all snakes used in analysis, as provided by DARTseq, and site and coordinates of each snake used in analysis. Data will be available upon publication.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES