Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2021 Jul 7;48:128252. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.128252

A microtubule-localizing activity-based sensing fluorescent probe for imaging hydrogen peroxide in living cells

Shang Jia a, Christopher J Chang a,b,*
PMCID: PMC8556696  NIHMSID: NIHMS1748836  PMID: 34245851

Abstract

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a major reactive oxygen species (ROS) in living systems with broad roles spanning both oxidative stress and redox signaling. Indeed, owing to its potent redox activity, regulating local sites of H2O2 generation and trafficking is critical to determining downstream physiological and/or pathological consequences. We now report the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of Microtubule Peroxy Yellow 1 (MT-PY1), an activity-based sensing fluorescent probe bearing a microtubule-targeting moiety for detection of H2O2 in living cells. MT-PY1 utilizes a boronate trigger to show a selective and robust turn-on response to H2O2 in aqueous solution and in living cells. Live-cell microscopy experiments establish that the probe co-localizes with microtubules and retains its localization after responding to changes in levels of H2O2, including detection of endogenous H2O2 fluxes produced upon growth factor stimulation. This work adds to the arsenal of activity-based sensing probes for biological analytes that enable selective molecular imaging with subcellular resolution.

Keywords: Activity-based sensing, Fluorescent probe, Molecular imaging, Reactive oxygen species, Hydrogen peroxide


Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a central member of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) family and is continually produced by foundational cellular processes that span respiration, oxidase catalysis, protein folding, and peroxisome activity1,2. On the other hand, dysregulation of H2O2 triggers oxidative stress and damage cascades that are implicated in aging3 and disease states, including cancer4,5, inflammation6,7, diabetes8, and neurodegeneration9. In the context of H2O2 as a physiological signal10,11, controlled and localized generation of this ROS occurs in response to various stimuli such as growth factors, cytokines, and neurotransmitters1215, where membrane-bound NADPH oxidases play a pivotal role in generating H2O2 fluxes in confined cellular spaces to react with downstream targets1618.

To meet the need for identifying and characterizing the diverse sources and functions of H2O2 as a transient redox messenger, we1921 and others2227 have developed molecular probes for selective monitoring of H2O2 to selectively disentangle its contributions from other ROS. In particular, our laboratory has advanced the use of H2O2-mediated boronate oxidation for H2O2 detection19,21 as part of a larger program in activity-based sensing for selective monitoring of biological analytes28,29. Since our initial report of Peroxyfluor-1 (PF1) that established selectivity for H2O2 detection over competing ROS and use in living cells30, we have designed activity-based boronate fluorescent probes for monitoring H2O2 with varying excitation/emission colors31, reagents with increased sensitivity for visualizing endogenous H2O2 at signaling levels32,33, two-color dyes for ratiometric H2O2 detection34,35, bifunctional probes for organelle-specific H2O2 detection36,37, cell-trappable sensors for intracellular H2O2 signaling and identification of peroxide channels and peroxide-dependent neurogenesis38,39, and more recently tandem activity-based sensing/labeling for identifying transcellular H2O2 signaling in microglia-neuron co-cultures40. Beyond acting as a general H2O2 caging group for fluorophores, the versatility of boronate triggers for H2O2 detection also enables development of the Peroxy Caged Luciferin family of bioluminescent H2O2 reporters based on caged luciferins41,42, histochemical analysis with Peroxymycin-1, a puromycin-based H2O2 detection reagent43, and a caged radiotracer for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of H2O244.

Against this backdrop, a key challenge to studying H2O2 signaling is the transient and localized nature of H2O2 fluxes. Indeed, traditional boronate fluorescent probes are diffusible before and after analyte detection, which can limit spatial resolution in monitoring localized H2O2 fluxes. To address this issue, we have reported SNAP Peroxy Green 1 (SNAP-PG1) and Peroxy Green 1 Fluoromethyl (PG1-FM) reagents that covalently label H2O2-responsive dyes onto intracellular proteins to limit probe diffusion37,40. Along these lines, we now report the design, synthesis, and evaluation of Microtubule Peroxy Yellow 1 (MT-PY1), a unique H2O2-responsive probe that localizes to microtubules that form part of the cytoskeleton and can retain its spatial localization before and after reporting on changes in H2O2 levels.

Inspired by reports that conjugate fluorophores to taxoids as a microtubule-targeting group for conventional45,46 and super-resolution4749 imaging of the cytoskeleton in living cells, along with leveraging our laboratory’s previous work on a modular rhodol scaffold in the development of a mitochondrial-targeted H2O2 probe, Mito-PY136, we designed and synthesized MT-PY1 by linking a boronate rhodol to the primary amine of a Boc-deprotected docetaxel via a suberic acid linker (Figure 1a). The analogous H2O2 probe without a targeting moiety, Peroxy Yellow 1 (PY1), has already been reported in a previous paper from our laboratory (Supplementary Figure S1)33. The synthesis of MT-PY1 is depicted in Scheme 1. The Boc-group on docetaxel was removed by treatment with formic acid, and the dicarboxylic linker was introduced with TSTU coupling to afford 2. The Fmoc-protected H2O2 sensing motif 3 shared the same initial steps with Mito-PY1. However, the amide formation step with TSTU was incompatible in the presence of dibenzofulvene as a byproduct of Fmoc-deprotection. This byproduct was removed by using tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (TAEA) as both deprotection reagent and dibenzofulvene scavenger50, which enables facile purification of the deprotected secondary amine for coupling with 3 to afford MT-PY1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Structures of (a) microtubule-targeting molecule docetaxel; (b) mitochondria-localizing H2O2 probe Mito-PY1, and (c) microtubule-localizing H2O2 probe MT-PY1.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Synthesis of MT-PY1 and its fluorescence turn-on reaction upon activity-based sensing of H2O2.

With the MT-PY1 probe in hand, we first evaluated its fluorescence turn-on behavior for activity-based sensing of H2O2 in in vitro experiments. We incubated the probe at 37 °C in aqueous media buffered to neutral pH for 1 h and observed a negligible measurable fluorescence response. In contrast, after incubation with 100 μM H2O2, we observed a 12-fold turn-on response within 1 h (Figure 2a), which is comparable with previously published boronate probes for activity-based sensing of H2O2. This result suggests that the introduction of docetaxel as the localizing moiety does not interfere with the activity-based sensing reaction between H2O2 and boronic ester. We further tested the response of MT-PY1 to other biologically relevant reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitrogen species (RNS) (Figure 2b). The results show that MT-PY1 reacts primarily with H2O2, which is in agreement with its non-targeted analog PY1 and other previously reported boronate-based H2O2 probes. The only exception is peroxynitrite (ONOO), which is not surprising given that some boronic esters also react with this RNS51,52. Indeed, we note that despite the fact that the relative in vitro reactivity of boronates with peroxynitrite can be comparable or faster than with hydrogen peroxide in aqueous buffer, in biological contexts one must consider that ONOO is a highly reactive species that exists in cells with exceedingly short lifetimes of 10–20 ms and estimated concentrations in the sub-nanomolar range53, whereas local H2O2 concentrations can approach micromolar levels54. As such, we advocate for the use of a straightforward control experiment in cells and other biological models with a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor. This type of experiment can distinguish between peroxide-dependent and peroxynitrite-dependent signals using boronate reagents, as the former will be insensitive to NOS inhibition whereas the latter will be sensitive to blocking of an NO source.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

In vitro characterization of MT-PY1. (a) Fluorescence emission spectrum of 5 μM MT-PY1 in 25 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.4 (bottom), and its turn-on response after treatment with 100 μM H2O2 at 37 °C for 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. (b) Fluorescence responses of 5 μM MT-PY1 to 100 μM of various reactive oxygen and nitrogen species at 37 °C after 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min of incubation.

We next evaluated the MT-PY1 reagent in cell imaging experiments by first testing whether the probe is able to localize onto microtubule structures. As expected, MT-PY1 showed an even distribution in the cytosol, visualizing a network of filaments that resembles the cytoskeleton outside the nucleus (Figure 3a). Moreover, images of a dividing cell also displayed a structure with the shape of a spindle apparatus with chromosomes in the center (Figure 3b). To confirm the subcellular localization of the MT-PY1 probe, we performed dual-color imaging experiments with cells that were transfected with mCherry-tubulin that assemble to form mCherry-decorated microtubules. Images of these cells after staining with MT-PY1 are shown in Figure 3c. Since taxoids show limited binding to free tubulin and only associate with assembled microtubules, cells in the MT-PY1 channel show a well-defined filament structure. In contrast, due to the different expression levels of mCherry-tubulin, some cells showed free, unassembled tubulin which light up the entire cytoplasm with less pronounced filament features. For cells that show primarily microtubule mCherry signal (outlined by dotted lines in Figure 3c), we observed strong colocalization between MT-PY1 in the green channel and mCherry-labeled microtubule in the red channel with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.92. Moreover, the probe is not cytotoxic at the low doses needed for imaging, with no observable inhibition effect even at 4 μM over 24 h incubation, which is well above the typical dose/time for an imaging experiment (Supplementary Figure S3). This result is in agreement with observations of reduced cytotoxicity in previously reported docetaxel-fluorophore conjugates compared to free docetaxel55 and is likely due to the increase of probe hydro-phobicity that can alter cell permeability and microtubule affinity49. Taken together, the imaging results establish that the taxoid moiety behaves as expected to assemble itself onto microtubule structures in living cells with negligible toxicity, which endows the MT-PY1 H2O2 probe with the ability to localize to microtubules.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Confocal microscopy images of MT-PY1 localization in HeLa cells. Cells were incubated with 1 μM MT-PY1 for 15 min at 37 °C prior to imaging. (a) A HeLa cell in metaphase. (b) A HeLa cell in interphase. Cell nucleus is stained by Hoechst 33342 in (a) and (b). (c) HeLa cells expressing mCherry-tubulin stained with MT-PY1. Enlarged image is shown in Supplementary Figure S2. Scale-bar: 10 μm.

We then evaluated the ability of MT-PY1 to respond to changes in H2O2 levels in living cells with exogenous incubation of ROS. Indeed, after loading live HeLa cells with MT-PY1, treatment with 100 μM H2O2 resulted in a significant fluorescence enhancement (Figure 4). More importantly, the probe retained its microtubule-localizing pattern after its turn-on response to H2O2, which establishes that the MT-PY1 reagent can sense changes in H2O2 localized to microtubules.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Fluorescence responses of MT-PY1 to exogenous addition of H2O2 in living cells. HeLa cells were incubated with 1 μM MT-PY1 for 0.5 h at 37 °C, followed by treatment with (a) vehicle control or (b) 100 μM H2O2 at 37 °C for 0.5 h; quantification is shown in (c). Scale-bar: 20 μm.

After establishing that MT-PY1 is suitable for monitoring changes in levels of H2O2 in cells with spatial resolution proximal to microtubules, we moved forward to testing the response of this activity-based sensing reagent to endogenous H2O2 produced by growth factor stimulation. We used A431 cells, a cancer cell line with high expression of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor, as a biological model for endogenous peroxide production generated by EGF treatment. Upon treatment of MT-PY1-loaded A431 cells with EGF (100 ng/mL), we observed a significant fluorescence turn-on response (Figure 5a,b), which is in the same range with PY1 under similar conditions with higher amounts of EGF added (500 ng/mL). Moreover, when we treated the cells with both EGF and L-NAME, a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor that can reduce generation of peroxynitrite and other RNS in cells, we observed a comparable fluorescence intensity signal compared to cells treated with EGF only (Figure 5c). This result indicates that peroxynitrite, which showed reactivity with MT-PY1 in in vitro assays, does not contribute to the observed turn-on response of the H2O2 probe in this biological context. In contrast, when we treated cells with EGF and PD15305, an EGF receptor inhibitor, we observed similar fluorescence to the un-treated cells (Figure 5d), further confirming that the turn-on effect was indeed resulted from endogenous H2O2 generated in the EGF signaling pathway. In contrast to the punctate staining of PY1 in A431 cells, a higher-magnification image showed filament-localization pattern of the MT-PY1 probe, correlating with the microtubule-localizing property of this dye that give rise to even and spatially-resolved distribution in cytoplasm (Figure 5e).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Fluorescence imaging of endogenous H2O2 generated by the EGF signaling pathway in live A431 cells. A431 cells incubated with 1 μM MT-PY1 for 0.5 h at 37 °C were treated with (a) vehicle control, (b) 100 ng/mL EGF, (c) 100 ng/mL EGF and 500 μM L-NAME or (d) 100 ng/mL EGF and 50 μM PD15305 for 30 min at 37 °C and imaged. (e) Zoomed-in images of A431 stained with MT-PY1 showing the high spatial resolution of this fluorescence probe. (f) Quantification of fluorescence intensity of a-d shown as mean ± s.d. Scale-bar: 50 μm.

To close, we have presented the design, synthesis, and properties of MT-PY1, a microtubule-targeting fluorescent probe for activity-based sensing of H2O2 in living cells. This reagent enables selective detection of changes in local H2O2 levels, including endogenous H2O2 produced by growth factor stimulation, with retention of microtubule targeting before and after ROS detection to preserve spatial information on redox signaling events. In addition to further applications of MT-PY1 and related reagents in deciphering the contributions of H2O2 to redox biology, this work provides a starting point for the design of a broader palette of activity-based sensing probes that utilize taxoid-targeting moieties to minimize probe diffusion before and after analyte detection.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

We thank the NIH (GM139465, GM79465, and ES28096) and Agilent for supporting this work. C.J.C. is a CIFAR Fellow. We thank Prof. Shixian Lin for help with mentoring and technical support in the early stages of this project.

Footnotes

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.128252.

References

  • 1.Snezhkina AV, Kudryavtseva AV, Kardymon OL, et al. ROS generation and antioxidant defense systems in normal and malignant cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:1–17. 10.1155/2019/6175804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schieber M, Chandel NS. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr Biol. 2014;24(10):R453–R462. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lisanti MP, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Lin Z, et al. Hydrogen peroxide fuels aging, inflammation, cancer metabolism and metastasis. Cell Cycle. 2011;10(15): 2440–2449. 10.4161/cc.10.15.16870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ishikawa K, Takenaga K, Akimoto M, et al. ROS-generating mitochondrial DNA mutations can regulate tumor cell metastasis. Science. 2008;320(5876):661–664. 10.1126/science:1156906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chandel NS, Vander Heiden MG, Thompson CB, Schumacker PT. Redox regulation of P53 during hypoxia. Oncogene. 2000;19(34):3840–3848. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rubartelli A, Lotze MT. Inside, outside, upside down: damage-associated molecular-pattern molecules (DAMPs) and redox. Trends Immunol. 2007;28(10):429–436. 10.1016/j.it.2007.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wittmann C, Chockley P, Singh SK, Pase L, Lieschke GJ, Grabher C. Hydrogen peroxide in inflammation: messenger, guide, and assassin. Advances in Hematology. 2012;2012:1–6. 10.1155/2012/541471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Houstis N, Rosen ED, Lander ES. Reactive oxygen species have a causal role in multiple forms of insulin resistance. Nature. 2006;440(7086):944–948. 10.1038/nature04634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin MT, Beal MF. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature. 2006;443(7113):787–795. 10.1038/nature05292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Finkel T Signal transduction by reactive oxygen species. J Cell Biol. 2011;194(1): 7–15. 10.1083/jcb.201102095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dickinson BC, Chang CJ. Chemistry and biology of reactive oxygen species in signaling or stress responses. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(8):504–511. 10.1038/nchembio.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sundaresan M, Yu Z-X, Ferrans VJ, Irani K, Finkel T. Requirement for generation of H2O2 for platelet-derived growth factor signal transduction. Science. 1995;270 (5234):296–299. 10.1126/science.270.5234.296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Avshalumov MV, Chen BT, Marshall SP, Peña DM, Rice ME. Glutamate-dependent inhibition of dopamine release in striatum is mediated by a new diffusible messenger, H2O2. J Neurosci. 2003;23(7):2744–2750. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02744.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.D’Autréaux B, Toledano MB. ROS as signalling molecules: mechanisms that generate specificity in ROS homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(10):813–824. 10.1038/nrm2256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Niethammer P, Grabher C, Look AT, Mitchison TJ. A tissue-scale gradient of hydrogen peroxide mediates rapid wound detection in Zebrafish. Nature. 2009;459 (7249):996–999. 10.1038/nature08119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lambeth JD. NOX enzymes and the biology of reactive oxygen. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(3):181–189. 10.1038/nri1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gough DR, Cotter TG. Hydrogen peroxide: a Jekyll and Hyde signalling molecule. Cell Death Dis. 2011;2(10):e213. 10.1038/cddis.2011.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Holmström KM, Finkel T. Cellular mechanisms and physiological consequences of redox-dependent signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(6):411–421. 10.1038/nrm3801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lippert AR, Van de Bittner GC, Chang CJ. Boronate oxidation as a bioorthogonal reaction approach for studying the chemistry of hydrogen peroxide in living systems. Acc. Chem. Res 2011;44(9):793–804. 10.1021/ar200126t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lin VS, Dickinson BC, Chang CJ. Chapter Two - Boronate-Based Fluorescent Probes: Imaging Hydrogen Peroxide in Living Systems. In Methods in Enzymology; Cadenas E, Packer L, Eds.; Hydrogen Peroxide and Cell Signaling, Part A; Academic Press, 2013; Vol. 526, pp 19–43. 10.1016/B978-0-12-405883-5.00002-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brewer TF, Garcia FJ, Onak CS, Carroll KS, Chang CJ. Chemical approaches to discovery and study of sources and targets of hydrogen peroxide redox signaling through NADPH oxidase proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84(1):765–790. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Maeda H, Fukuyasu Y, Yoshida S, et al. Fluorescent probes for hydrogen peroxide based on a non-oxidative mechanism. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43(18):2389–2391. 10.1002/anie.200452381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abo M, Urano Y, Hanaoka K, Terai T, Komatsu T, Nagano T. Development of a highly sensitive fluorescence probe for hydrogen peroxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011;133(27): 10629–10637. 10.1021/ja203521e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hitomi Y, Takeyasu T, Funabiki T, Kodera M. Detection of enzymatically generated hydrogen peroxide by metal-based fluorescent probe. Anal. Chem 2011;83(24): 9213–9216. 10.1021/ac202534g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ye S, Hu JJ, Yang D. Tandem Payne/Dakin reaction: a new strategy for hydrogen peroxide detection and molecular imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2018;57(32): 10173–10177. 10.1002/anie.201805162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ye S, Hananya N, Green O, et al. A highly selective and sensitive chemiluminescent probe for real-time monitoring of hydrogen peroxide in cells and animals. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(34):14326–14330. 10.1002/anie.202005429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pham D, Basu U, Pohorilets I, St Croix CM, Watkins SC, Koide K. Fluorogenic probe using a mislow-evans rearrangement for real-time imaging of hydrogen peroxide. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(40):17435–17441. 10.1002/anie.202007104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chan J, Dodani SC, Chang CJ. Reaction-based small-molecule fluorescent probes for chemoselective bioimaging. Nat Chem. 2012;4(12):973–984. 10.1038/nchem.1500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bruemmer KJ, Crossley SWM, Chang CJ. Activity-based sensing: a synthetic methods approach for selective molecular imaging and beyond. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59 (33):13734–13762. 10.1002/anie.201909690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chang MCY, Pralle A, Isacoff EY, Chang CJ. A selective, cell-permeable optical probe for hydrogen peroxide in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004;126(47):15392–15393. 10.1021/ja0441716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Miller EW, Albers AE, Pralle A, Isacoff EY, Chang CJ. Boronate-based fluorescent probes for imaging cellular hydrogen peroxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2005;127(47): 16652–16659. 10.1021/ja054474f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Miller EW, Tulyathan O, Isacoff EY, Chang CJ. Molecular imaging of hydrogen peroxide produced for cell signaling. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3(5):263–267. 10.1038/nchembio871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dickinson BC, Huynh C, Chang CJ. A palette of fluorescent probes with varying emission colors for imaging hydrogen peroxide signaling in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010;132(16):5906–5915. 10.1021/ja1014103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Albers AE, Okreglak VS, Chang CJ. A FRET-based approach to ratiometric fluorescence detection of hydrogen peroxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006;128(30): 9640–9641. 10.1021/ja063308k10.1021/ja063308k.s001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Srikun D, Miller EW, Domaille DW, Chang CJ. An ICT-based approach to ratiometric fluorescence imaging of hydrogen peroxide produced in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008;130(14):4596–4597. 10.1021/ja711480f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dickinson BC, Chang CJ. A targetable fluorescent probe for imaging hydrogen peroxide in the mitochondria of living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008;130(30): 9638–9639. 10.1021/ja802355u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Srikun D, Albers AE, Nam CI, Iavarone AT, Chang CJ. Organelle-targetable fluorescent probes for imaging hydrogen peroxide in living cells via SNAP-tag protein labeling. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010;132(12):4455–4465. 10.1021/ja100117u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miller EW, Dickinson BC, Chang CJ. Aquaporin-3 mediates hydrogen peroxide uptake to regulate downstream intracellular signaling. PNAS. 2010;107(36): 15681–15686. 10.1073/pnas.1005776107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dickinson BC, Peltier J, Stone D, Schaffer DV, Chang CJ. Nox2 redox signaling maintains essential cell populations in the brain. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(2):106–112. 10.1038/nchembio.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Iwashita H, Castillo E, Messina MS, Swanson RA, Chang CJ. A tandem activity-based sensing and labeling strategy enables imaging of transcellular hydrogen peroxide signaling. PNAS. 2021;118(9). 10.1073/pnas.2018513118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Van de Bittner GC, Dubikovskaya EA, Bertozzi CR, Chang CJ. In vivo imaging of hydrogen peroxide production in a murine tumor model with a chemoselective bioluminescent reporter. PNAS. 2010;107(50):21316–21321. 10.1073/pnas.1012864107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Van de Bittner GC, Bertozzi CR, Chang CJ. Strategy for Dual-Analyte LUCIFERIN imaging. In vivo bioluminescence detection of hydrogen peroxide and caspase activity in a murine model of acute inflammation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013;135(5): 1783–1795. 10.1021/ja309078t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yik-Sham Chung C, Timblin GA, Saijo K, Chang CJ. Versatile histochemical approach to detection of hydrogen peroxide in cells and tissues based on puromycin staining. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018;140(19):6109–6121. 10.1021/jacs.8b02279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Carroll V, Michel BW, Blecha J, et al. A Boronate-Caged [18F]FLT probe for hydrogen peroxide detection using positron emission tomography. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014;136(42):14742–14745. 10.1021/ja509198w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Evangelio JA, Abal M, Barasoain I, et al. Fluorescent taxoids as probes of the microtubule cytoskeleton. Cell Motility. 1998;39(1):73–90. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lee MM, Gao Z, Peterson BR. Synthesis of a fluorescent analogue of paclitaxel that selectively binds microtubules and sensitively detects efflux by P-glycoprotein. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56(24):6927–6931. 10.1002/anie.201703298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lukinavičius G, Reymond L, D’Este E, et al. Fluorogenic probes for live-cell imaging of the cytoskeleton. Nat Methods. 2014;11(7):731–733. 10.1038/nmeth.2972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Butkevich AN, Belov VN, Kolmakov K, et al. Hydroxylated fluorescent dyes for live-cell labeling: synthesis, spectra and super-resolution STED. Chem – A Eur J. 2017;23 (50):12114–12119. 10.1002/chem.201701216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lukinavičius G, Mitronova GY, Schnorrenberg S, et al. Fluorescent dyes and probes for super-resolution microscopy of microtubules and tracheoles in living cells and tissues. Chem. Sci 2018;9(13):3324–3334. 10.1039/C7SC05334G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Carpino LA, Sadat-Aalaee D, Beyermann M. Tris(2-Aminoethyl)Amine as Substitute for 4-(Aminomethyl)Piperidine in the FMOC/polyamine approach to rapid peptide synthesis. J. Org. Chem 1990;55(5):1673–1675. 10.1021/jo00292a050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sikora A, Zielonka J, Lopez M, Joseph J, Kalyanaraman B. Direct oxidation of boronates by peroxynitrite: mechanism and implications in fluorescence imaging of peroxynitrite. Free Radical Biol Med. 2009;47(10):1401–1407. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wu L, Sedgwick AC, Sun X, Bull SD, He X-P, James TD. Reaction-based fluorescent probes for the detection and imaging of reactive oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur species. Acc. Chem. Res 2019;52(9):2582–2597. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Carballal S, Bartesaghi S, Radi R. Kinetic and mechanistic considerations to assess the biological fate of peroxynitrite. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840(2):768–780. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stone JR, Yang S. Hydrogen peroxide: a signaling messenger. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8(3–4):243–270. 10.1089/ars.2006.8.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dubois J, Le Goff M-T, Guéritte-Voegelein F, Guénard D, Tollon Y, Wright M. Fluorescent and biotinylated analogues of docetaxel: synthesis and biological evaluation. Bioorg Med Chem. 1995;3(10):1357–1368. 10.1016/0968-0896(95)00115-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

RESOURCES