Skip to main content
Journal of Neuroinflammation logoLink to Journal of Neuroinflammation
. 2021 Oct 30;18:250. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02296-8

T-cell dysregulation is associated with disease severity in Parkinson’s Disease

Divisha Bhatia 1,#, Veselin Grozdanov 1,#, Wolfgang P Ruf 1, Jan Kassubek 1, Albert C Ludolph 1,2, Jochen H Weishaupt 1,3, Karin M Danzer 1,2,
PMCID: PMC8556877  PMID: 34717679

Abstract

The dysregulation of peripheral immunity in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) includes changes in both the relative numbers and gene expression of T cells. The presence of peripheral T-cell abnormalities in PD is well-documented, but less is known about their association to clinical parameters, such as age, age of onset, progression rate or severity of the disease. We took a detailed look at T-cell numbers, gene expression and activation in cross-sectional cohorts of PD patients and age-matched healthy controls by means of flow cytometry and NanoString gene expression assay. We show that the well-pronounced decrease in relative T-cell numbers in PD blood is mostly driven by a decrease of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and is primarily associated with the severity of the disease. In addition, we demonstrate that the expression of inflammatory genes in T cells from PD patients is also associated with disease severity. PD T cells presented with increased activation upon stimulation with phytohemagglutinin that also correlated with disease severity. In summary, our data suggest that the consequences of disease severity account for the changes in PD T cells, rather than age, age of onset, duration or the disease progression rate.

Keywords: Parkinson’s Disease, T cells, Disease severity, PHA, Gene expression

Introduction

Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) includes the infiltration of T cells into the diseased CNS, with reactive T cells surrounding neurons and likely contributing to their demise [1]. Neuroinflammation in the CNS is complemented by well-described immune changes in the periphery, including changes in the absolute and relative numbers of monocytes and lymphocytes and their subsets [25], increased activation by inflammatory stimuli [2, 6] and the presence of auto-immune components, such as T cells and antibodies reactive to alpha-synuclein [7, 8]. Recently, T cells have received special attention due to the discovery that the genetic association of HLA-DR haplotypes with PD [9, 10] underlies an increase of T cells reactive to a-synuclein [8, 11]. Other phenotypic changes of T cells in PD are also known: reduced absolute lymphocyte counts, decreased absolute and relative counts of total T cells, decreased absolute and relative counts of CD4 + , and sometimes also CD8 + lymphocytes, increased Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg ratios and increased expression of inflammatory cytokines [5, 1227]. However, most of these changes are also found during healthy aging, making it difficult to discern the impact of a disease, such as PD, which presents with a very broad range of onset (~ 30–90 years) and variable progression rate. Most studies so far concentrated on disease severity, or disease duration as a proxy of it, without considering the influence of sex and aging. As T-cell characteristics are an easily accessible parameter which can be tracked during the course of disease-modifying therapies, it is important to better understand which features correlate with disease severity and how they are biased by other clinical parameters, such as sex, age, age at onset and progression rate of the disease. Therefore, we investigated several T-cell features in cross-sectional cohorts of PD patients and healthy controls (HC): T-cell numbers as a robust and universal, well-described alteration in PD, T-cells activation and expression of inflammatory genes.

Methods

Study participants

All experimental work with human samples was carried out in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki and under the approval of the Ethics Committee of the University of Ulm, Germany (“Antrag Nr. 20/10”). All study participants provided informed written consent to participate in the study. PD patients and healthy controls were recruited through the Universitäts- und Rehabilitationskliniken Ulm (RKU). Age-matched healthy controls were recruited based on negative history of neurological disease. PD patients and healthy controls with a history of acute or chronic inflammatory or autoimmune disease or medication were excluded from the study. Disease severity was assessed by an experienced neurologist according to the Hoehn & Yahr (HY) PD staging criteria [28]. Demographic and clinical characteristics including medication and selected comorbidities are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical, demographic and T-cell characteristics of the experimental cohorts

n Age Sex (f/m) Age at diagnosis Disease duration Progression rate Disease severity T-cells
% CD3 +  % CD4 +  % CD8 + 
Immunophenotyping (Figs. 1, 2) 36 Information available: n = 36/36 Information available: n = 36/36
Mean ± stdev 70.3 ± 9.5 12/24 60.0 ± 9.8 10.3 ± 6.0 0.33 ± 0.32 2.4 ± 0.94 11.5 ± 5.4 7.8 ± 3.4 2.4 ± 2.5
Median (interq. range) 72.1 (63.8–78.1) 62.5 (52.8–66.0) 8.7 (7.0–14.8) 0.25 (0.20–0.40) 2.0 (1.0–3.0) 9.8 (8.6–13.2) 6.7 (6.0–8.4) 1.8 (1.1–2.9)
Gene expession (Fig. 3) 16 Information available: n = 16/16 Information available: n = 10/16
Mean ± stdev 68.1 ± 9.6 4/12 58.7 ± 11.2 9.4 ± 7.5 0.44 ± 0.58 2.3 ± 0.99 14.7 ± 7.6 9.4 ± 4.5 3.9 ± 4.1
Median (interq. range) 70.5 (64.0–74.0) 59.0 (47.8–67.8) 7.0 (5.0–11.0) 0.22 (0.19–0.50) 2.0 (1.5–2.6) 10.9 (9.3–19.5) 6.7 (6.4–12.1) 2.8 (1.7–4.1)
T-cell function (Fig. 4) 23 Information available: n = 23/23 Information available: n = 0/23
Mean ± stdev 68.9 ± 10.5 6/17 60.2 ± 9.2 8.7 ± 6.2 0.51 ± 0.46 2.4 ± 1.0
Median (interq. range) 67.0 (63.5–78.5) 60.0 (51.5–69.0) 8.0 (3.0–13.5) 0.31 (0.24–0.83) 2.0 (2.0–3.0)
n Medication Comorbidities
No medication Levodopa Dopamine Agonists COMT Inhibitors MAO-B Inhibitors DOPA-decarboxylase Inhibitors No comorbidities Dementia Hallucinations Other comorbidities
Immunophenotyping (Figs. 1, 2) 36 Information available: n = 32/36 Information available: n = 33/36
n 0/32 28/32 22/32 18/32 14/32 28/32 3/33 1/33 5/33 30/33
Gene expression (Fig. 3) 16 Information available: n = 13/16 Information available: n = 13/16
n 0/13 12/13 9/13 6/13 4/13 12/13 2/13 1/13 3/13 11/13
T-cell function (Fig. 4) 23 Information available: n = 23/23 Information available: n = 0/23
n 0/23 14/23 12/23 8/23 13/23 14/23

Continuous variables presented as mean ± standard deviation (“stdev”) and median with interquartile range (“interq. range”, 1. and 3. quartile). Side effects from medication are not included in comorbidities. Comorbidities listed under “Others”: Anxiety disorder, atherosclerosis, bursitis, Carpal tunnel syndrome, cholelithiasis, chronic kidney failure, chronic venous insufficiency, reactive collagenosis, convex scoliosis, COPD, coronary bypass, coronary heart disease, Crohn’s disease, degenerative joint disease, degenerative spine disease, depression, diplopia, dorsal funiculus symptoms, heart arrythmia with atrial fibrillation, heart valve fibrosis, heart valve sclerosis, hemodynamic orthostatic vertigo, hypercholesterolemia, hyperlipoproteinemia, hyperopia, hyperparathyroidism, hypertension, hyperuricemia, hypothyroidism, inclusion body myositis, lactose intolerance, lentigo maligna, lumbago, mitral insufficiency, myalgia, myopathy, nephrolithiasis, osteochondrosis, osteoporosis, chronic pain syndrome, polyarthritis, prostatic adenoma, sensorymotor polyneuropathy, sleep apnea, spinal disc herniation, supraventricular extrasystole, tachycardia, thrombophlebitis, tinnitus, type 2 diabetes, vitamin B12 deficiency

COMT catechol-O-methyltransferase, MAO-B Monoamine oxidase B, DOPA 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine

Flow cytometry

Peripheral blood samples were collected with Li-Heparin Monovettes (Sarstedt) and processed within 3 h. Red blood cells were eliminated by osmotic lysis with RBC lysis buffer as described before [2]. Leucocytes were then washed, re-suspended in FACS buffer (DPBS + 10% FCS). Unspecific binding of antibodies to cell surface receptors was blocked with Fc Block (1:20, BioLegend) or human TruStain Fc Block (BioLegend) for 20 min at 4 °C. Leucocytes were stained with antibodies specific for CD3 (1:50, BioLegend; UCHT1-PB), CD4 (1:100, BioLegend RPA-T4-PE), CD8 (1:100, BioLegend, SK1-APC), and CD69 (1:50, BioLegend; FN50-FITC) for 25 min at 4 °C in the dark. After washing, the stained cells were fixed for 20 min in 2% PFA, filtered through a 70 µM cell-strainer and characterized by flow cytometry on a LSRII flow cytometer (BD) using a combination of unstained cells, internal negative population controls and single-color staining for color compensation. Therefore, isotype-matched, host-matched monoclonal antibodies were used as negative control: mouse IgG2a, κ (BioLegend; MOPC-173-PE-Cy7), mouse IgG1, κ (BioLegend; MPOK-21-PB), mouse IgG1, κ (BioLegend; MOPC-21-PE), mouse IgG2a, κ (eBioscience; P3.6.2.81-APC). Flow cytometry data was processed with FACS Diva™ software (BD).

T-cell culture

Blood samples were obtained by venipuncture and collected with K3-EDTA Monovettes (Sarstedt). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were enriched by density gradient centrifugation over Histopaque®-1077 (Sigma-Aldrich) as previously described [29]. CD3+ T cells were enriched by magnetic-activated cell selection with magnetic-beads-coupled monoclonal antibodies to CD3 (Miltenyi Biotec). Purified CD3+ T cells were cultured in RPMI1640 cell culture medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FCS (PAA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (PAA) at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The purity of the isolated T cells was controlled by flow cytometry. For stimulation of T cells, cells were pelleted at 500 g for 5 min and re-suspended in T-cell activation media (Gibco; PB-MAX™ Karyotyping Medium) at a total density of 4 × 105 cells/mL. After 72 h of stimulation, the activation of the T cells was assayed by flow cytometry for CD69 expression.

Inflammatory gene expression

Expression of inflammatory genes was quantified on with the NanoString Inflammation Panel on an nCounter® analyzer with standard parameters according to the supplier’s instructions. Total RNA was isolated from T cells purified by CD3 + magnetic selection as described above. Gene expression data was normalized to the geomean expression of six house-keeping genes and differential expression analyzed with DESeq2 [30].

RT-qPCR was performed as described before [2] with total mRNA isolated from purified CD3+ T cells. Gene expression of CXCL3 (5′-CCT GCC CTT ACC AGA GCT GAA A-3′ and 5′-ATT AAG TCC TTT CCA GCT GTC CC-3′), CCR1 (5’-ATG CAA CTC CGT GCC AGA AGG-3′ and 5′-AGG TCA GAA ATG GCC AGG TTC A-3′) and CXCL2 (5′-CCA CTG TGA TAG AGG CTG AGG AA-3′ and 5′-ATA CAT TTC CCT GCC GTC ACA TT-3′) was quantified with the 2−ΔΔCt method [31] relative to the expression of B2M (5′-AGA TGA GTA TGC CTG CCG TG-3′ and 5′-GCG GCA TCT TCA AAC CTC CA-3′), TBP (5′-CCC ATG ACT CCC ATG ACC-3′ and 5′-TTT ACA ACC AAG ATT CAC TGT GG-3′) and RNU6 (5′-CTC GCT TCG GCA GCA CAT-3′ and 5’-AAC GCT TCA CGA ATT TGC GT-3′). The expression of each reference gene was controlled against the expression of the other two reference genes to exclude co-regulation of the reference and inflammatory genes. Genomic DNA and PCR artifacts were excluded with NTC and NRT controls and by optimization of primer design.

Data analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out with R 4.0.3 (R Core Team). Gaussian distribution was tested with D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test, Shapiro–Wilk normality test and Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test. Statistical significance between distributions of two groups was tested with Mann–Whitney U test; correlation with Spearman’s correlation and odd ratios with Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Multiple testing was controlled with Bonferroni. Interaction of covariates on dependable variables was tested with two-way ANOVA. Density bandwidth estimation for the stratification of PD patients according to clinical parameters was performed with the Sheather and Jones method to avoid under- and oversmoothing [32]. Hierarchical clustering of gene expression data was performed with average linkage and Euclidean distance. Differential gene expression was analyzed with DESeq2 with standard parameters [30]. Statistical significance of differential expression data was corrected for multiple testing with FDR [33]. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis was performed with the WGCNA R package [34, 35]. Flow cytometry data were analyzed with FACS Diva 8.0.1 software (BD).

Results

Decrease of total CD3+ T cells in PD is associated with disease severity

To investigate how clinical parameters of PD relate to the changes observed in the numbers of T cells in PD, we investigated the relative abundance of total CD3+ T cells, as well as the subpopulations of CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells in a cross-sectional cohort of 36 PD patients (mean age 70.3 ± 9.5; f/m = 12/24; mean H&Y 2.4 ± 0.94) and 20 age-matched (p > 0.32) healthy controls (mean age 67.8 ± 8.0; f/m = 13/7) (Fig. 1A). We observed a statistically significant decrease of CD3+ T cells (as % of all leucocytes) in PD patients (Fig. 1B), which was independent of differences in the age (Fig. 1C, two-way ANOVA **p < 0.01 for HC vs. PD, p > 0.35 for ≤ 64 years vs. > 64 years, p > 0.86 for interaction) or sex of PD patients and healthy controls (Fig. 1D, two-way ANOVA **p < 0.01 for HC vs. PD, p > 0.36 for f vs. m, p > 0.78 for interaction). We then investigated the association of CD3+ cell decrease with age at initial diagnosis, disease duration, disease progression rate and disease severity assessed by H&Y score. Notably, only disease severity correlated with the observed decrease of CD3+ T cells (Fig. 1E, *p < 0.05, q < 0.16, Spearman’s ρ = − 0.36). Stratification by clinical parameters revealed a statistically significant difference in CD3+ T cells numbers between patients with relatively earlier disease (H&Y < 3) and relatively advanced disease (H&Y ≥ 3) (Fig. 1I, *p < 0.05), but not between PD patients stratified by age at diagnosis (< 60 years vs. ≥ 60 years, Fig. 1F), disease duration since initial diagnosis (< 8 years vs. ≥ 8 years) and disease progression rate (assessed by H&Y stage increase per year since initial diagnosis, < 0.25 vs. ≥ 0.25, Fig. 1G). Furthermore, a multivariate analysis of variation with the discretely stratified clinical traits confirmed that only disease severity has a significant effect on the number of CD3+ T cells, with no detectable interaction between any combination of the clinical traits.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Decrease of total CD3+ T cells in PD is associated with disease progression. A, B Flow-cytometric analysis of peripheral blood leucocytes from HC (n = 20, f/m = 13/7) and PD patients (n = 36, 12/24 f/m) reveals a significant decrease of total CD3+ T cells (as % of all leucocytes) in PD. C, D T cells are decreased in PD in both age groups (≤ 64 years and > 64 years) and in both sexes (two-way ANOVA: case **p < 0.01, sex p > 0.36, age p > 0.35, no statistically significant interactions). E T-cell decrease correlates significantly with disease progression (Spearman’s ρ). F–I CD3+ T cells are significantly decreased in PD patients with advanced disease progression (H&Y ≥ 3) (I), but not earlier age at onset (F), longer disease duration (G), or higher progression rate (H, H&Y/year). Boxplots: median ± interquartile range; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U test, two-way ANOVA

Next, we investigated whether the decrease of CD3+ T cells in PD patients results from changes in the abundance of the T-cell subpopulations CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, and whether the abundance of these cell types also associates with clinical parameters of the disease. We found that both CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells were significantly decreased in PD patients (Fig. 2A, E). However, CD3+CD8+ T cells showed a stronger decrease than CD3+CD4+ T cells (fold change of medians CD4+: 0.68, CD8+: 0.40), resulting in an increase of the relative percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells and the CD4+:CD8+ cell ratio in PD patients. The decrease of each cell type alone was not significantly associated with any clinical trait, but showed a trend for association with disease severity (Fig. 2B–D, F–H; p < 0.13 (CD3+CD4+), p < 0.09 (CD3+CD8+)). We found no significant correlation of the absolute or relative numbers of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells with any clinical parameter of PD.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are decreased in PD. A CD3+CD4+ T cells are significantly decreased in PD patients (as % of all leucocytes, two-way ANOVA: case *p < 0.05, sex p > 0.36, age p > 0.41, no statistically significant interactions). B Correlation of CD3+CD4+ cell numbers with PD clinical traits (Spearman’s ρ). C, D CD3+CD4+ cell numbers in PD patients stratified by disease duration (C) and disease progression (D). E CD3+CD8+ T cells are significantly decreased in PD patients (as % of all leucocytes, two-way ANOVA: case **p < 0.01, sex p > 0.41 age p > 0.62, no statistically significant interactions). F Correlation of CD3+CD8+ cell numbers with PD clinical traits (Spearman’s ρ). G, H CD3+CD8+ cell numbers in PD patients stratified by disease duration (G) and disease progression (H). Boxplots: median ± interquartile range; *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney U test, two-way ANOVA

Expression of inflammatory genes and activation by PHA in T cells from PD patients are associated with disease severity

The association of inflammation with PD progression is well-documented. Therefore, to further characterize the dysregulation of T cells in PD patients and its association to clinical parameters of the disease, we purified CD3+ T cells by magnetic-activated cell sorting in a cross-sectional cohort of PD patients (n = 16, mean age 68.1 ± 9.6; f/m = 4/12) and healthy controls (n = 14, mean age 64.1 ± 14.5; f/m = 10/4) and quantified the expression of 249 inflammatory genes with the NanoString Inflammation panel expression assay (Fig. 3A). We observed that the total expression of all 249 inflammatory genes was slightly, but not statistically significantly increased in PD patients (Fig. 3A, p < 0.25). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering demonstrated that the expression levels of all 249 quantified inflammatory genes did not robustly differentiate between PD patients and healthy controls, although some sub-clusters were visible (Fig. 3B). Differential expression analysis identified one gene which was significantly down-regulated and eight genes which were significantly up-regulated in PD T cells (Fig. 3C; fc < / > 0.5, q < 0.05), with an enrichment of cytokines and chemokines (IL6, IL8, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5). Due to the uneven distribution of male and female volunteers between the PD patients and healthy controls groups, we controlled the expression of all nine differentially expressed genes for an effect of sex or age of the volunteers with multivariate two-way ANOVA. None of the nine differential genes’ expression was affected by sex or age of the study participants and no interaction between case and age/sex was observed at p < 0.05. The expression of these genes was highly variable in the PD patients group (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, we could validate the differential expression of two of the three top differentially expressed genes in an independent validation cohort by RT-qPCR (Fig. 3E, HC/PD n = 12/12; HC: mean age 64.7 ± 7.9, f/m = 5/7; PD: mean age 69.1 ± 5.8, f/m = 5/7, mean disease severity: 2.2 ± 0.9 HY, mean disease duration: 7.5 ± 5.4 years). Next, to investigate whether PD clinical traits are associated with the expression of inflammatory genes in T cells, we performed a weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), clustering the 249 inflammatory genes into six modules of similar expression pattern across all PD patients and healthy controls (“Modules A–F”). Correlation of the module expression scores with clinical parameters revealed that the expression of two modules (“E” and “F”) was associated with disease duration, while the expression of one module (“B”) was significantly, positively correlated to disease severity and progression rate (Fig. 3F). To gain further mechanistic insight, we analyzed the functional enrichment of Gene Ontology (GO) terms of the genes in modules “B”, “E” and “F” against the full list of 249 quantified inflammatory genes (Fig. 3G). We found that genes involved in the regulation of gliogenesis and acute inflammatory response were significantly enriched (**p < 0.01, q > 0.05) in module “B”, which was associated with disease severity.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Expression of inflammatory genes in T cells from PD patients is associated with disease progression and disease duration. A Expression of 249 inflammatory genes was quantified with a NanoString expression assay in isolated CD3+ T cells from HC (n = 14, f/m = 10/4) and PD patients (n = 16, f/m = 4/12). Mean expression of all 249 quantified transcripts was slightly increased in PD patients (p = 0.24). B PD patients could not be identified based on the expression signature of all 249 transcripts (complete linkage with Euclidean distance). C Volcano plot and heatmap (D) of the differential expression analysis between HC and PD T cells. Nine genes were significantly differentially expressed in PD T cells (fdr q < 0.05, fold change < − 1.4/> 1.4). None of the nine genes’ expression was significantly affected by the age or sex of participants (two-way ANOVA). E Significant up-regulation of selected transcripts could be verified in an independent validation cohort by RT-qPCR (HC/PD n = 12/12). F WGCNA analysis reveals six blocks (modules “A”–“F”) of genes, which are co-expressed in a similar fashion amongst all samples. The weighted co-expression scores of these modules do not correlate significantly with case (HC or PD), sex, age or age at disease onset. Three gene modules (“B”, “E” and “F”) significantly correlated with disease duration and disease progression in PD patients. G GO enrichment analyses of modules “B”, “E” and “F” against the full list of all 249 quantified inflammatory genes reveals association of disease progression with genes important in acute inflammatory response and gliogenesis, and of disease duration with I-κB/NF-κB signaling. Boxplot: median ± interquartile range; lines (E): median; heatmap rows (genes) scaled to z-scores; *p < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test; WGCNA correlation assessed with Pearson’s correlation coefficient; GO fdr q < 0.05

To investigate the functional relevance of this finding, we next mimicked acute inflammatory response by stimulating T cells with PHA and measured T-cell activation with flow cytometry using CD69 staining in an independent cohort of 23 PD (mean age 68.9 ± 10.5; f/m = 6/17) patients and 14 healthy controls (mean age 67.3 ± 12.2; f/m = 6/8) (Fig. 4A). As with gene expression, we found only a slight, statistically non-significant increase of T-cell activation by PHA in PD patients’ T cells (Fig. 4B, p > 0.32). Activation of T cells was not significantly correlated to any clinical trait; however, stratification into discrete clinical traits revealed a significantly increased activation of T cells in PD patients with more advanced disease (Fig. 4D, p < 0.05, no statistically significant bias by age or sex). T-cell activation did not significantly differ in all other discretely stratified clinical traits.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Increased activation of PD T cells by PHA is associated with disease progression. A, B CD3+ T cells were enriched from peripheral blood, stimulated with PHA and T-cell activation assayed by quantitation of CD69 expression on the cell surface. Activation was slightly increased in PD patients’ T cells [HC (n = 14, f/m = 6/8) and PD patients (n = 23, 6/17 f/m), p < 0.09, two-way ANOVA: case p < 0.10, sex p > 0.99, age p < 0.16]. C Correlation of T-cell activation with PD clinical traits (Spearman’s ρ). D T-cell activation is significantly increased in PD patients with advanced disease progression (H&Y ≥ 3. two-way ANOVA: H&Y *p < 0.05, sex p > 0.25, age p > 0.51). Boxplots: median ± interquartile range; *p < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test, two-way ANOVA

Discussion

In the present work, we investigated the association of the clinical parameters of PD age at diagnosis, disease duration, disease progression rate and disease severity as well as age and sex of the probands with changes of T-cell numbers, expression of inflammatory genes in T cells, and activation of T cells by PHA. Through thorough statistical analysis, we demonstrate that disease severity is the only clinical trait correlating with T-cell pathology independently from age, sex and other clinical traits of PD. Our data suggests that total CD3+ numbers and expression of inflammatory markers are robust markers of PD severity and warrants further validation with standardized procedures in large, multi-center approaches.

Standardized T-cell counts and phenotyping are an easily accessible, automatable readout which can be routinely utilized at relative low costs to longitudinally track disease progression in controlled settings, such as clinical trials for disease-modifying therapies. However, determining T-cell features suffers from lack of specificity; thus, it is necessary to fully understand common confounding factors and ideally to complement it by an additional readout that increases specificity. We address this paradigm by demonstrating that both CD3+ cell numbers and inflammatory gene expression in T cells correlate mainly with disease severity. The main limitation of our study is the relatively low cohort number, limiting the statistical power and thus the certainty with which correlation with other clinical parameters can be ruled out. However, the cohort size in this study is sufficient to demonstrate that disease severity is the main clinical trait that defines the measured T-cell features. Indeed, several other studies have found that the relative abundance of subsets of T cells correlates with disease severity: CD4 + T cells [15, 18], Th1/Th2 T cells [21], Th17/Treg cells [21, 26]. The relative reduction of a leucocyte subset can result from its own decrease or from an increase of the other subsets in the superset. Therefore, it is important to base all analyses on an absolute leucocyte or lymphocyte count. In our study, we chose the total number of CD3+ T cells as a readout, which has been verified numerous times previously by absolute counts [1416, 18]. Further factors that could not be taken in consideration in this study, but should be included in future large-scale analyses, concern diurnal variation in leucocyte subsets, bias by comorbidities, CMV serology and effect of medication. The latter two have been partially addressed in previous studies, which found no significant bias by these factors [5, 14]. One further study demonstrated a clear effect specifically of levodopa on T-cell numbers [27], and it is also known that dopamine has a strong effect on T cells. Thus, levodopa medication may induce or enhance the T-cell decrease in PD patients. However, it is unlikely that levodopa medication confounds the association of T-cell decrease with disease severity, since the majority (88%) of the PD patients in our immunophenotyping study were treated with levodopa.

Interestingly, recent breakthrough studies have demonstrated that alpha-synuclein-specific T cells are increased in PD patients, probably in association with risk haplotypes of HLA, and suggest an autoimmune involvement of T cells in PD [8, 11]. A causal role of alpha-synuclein reactive T cells was recently reinforced also by an animal model study [36]. The occurrence of alpha-synuclein-reactive T cells was increased years before motor onset in a case study and their frequency was highest around and shortly after motor onset in a larger cross-sectional cohort of PD patients [11]. After motor onset, the T-cell response to alpha-synuclein declined with increasing disease duration. By contrast, our data suggests a progressing generalized T-cell dysfunction with ongoing disease, probably reflecting the combined effect of ongoing inflammation, medication and lifestyle change. Thus, specific T-cell reactivity to alpha-synuclein will be more informative before and around disease onset, e.g., in prospective clinical studies, while generalized T-cell dysfunction will be more appropriate for tracking disease progress in disease-modifying trials.

To our knowledge, our study is the first to address the association of T-cell gene expression and clinical parameters of PD. While the sample size of the PD group was too small for reliable correlation of single genes with disease parameters, statistical power was sufficient for the blockwise correlation of gene expression with disease parameters. Indeed, we found a correlation of disease severity with modules of inflammatory gene expression, which could be validated also on a functional level. Further studies with larger numbers of PD patients are warranted to select optimal gene targets for expression analysis to complement T-cell counts for increased specificity of disease severity tracking.

Acknowledgements

We thank all volunteers who participated in the study. We thank R. Bück for the excellent technical assistance and S. Milde, L. Bayer and M. Pflüger for collecting blood samples.

Abbreviations

PD

Parkinson’s Disease

CNS

Central nervous system

HC

Healthy control

HY

Hoehn & Yahr stage

PBMC

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell

GO

Gene Ontology

RT-qPCR

Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

FDR

False discovery rate

PHA

Phytohemagglutinin

Author’s contributions

DB performed the experiments, DB, VG and WPR analyzed the data, ACL, JK, JHW and KMD provided intellectual input. VG and KMD wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Emmy Noether Research Group DA 1657/2-1 (KMD, VG) and GRK 1789 (CEMMA, DB).

Availability of data and materials

The data sets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental work with human samples was carried out in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki and under the approval of the Ethics Committee of the University of Ulm, Germany. All study participants provided informed written consent to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Divisha Bhatia and Veselin Grozdanov have contributed equally to this work

References

  • 1.Brochard V, Combadiere B, Prigent A, Laouar Y, Perrin A, Beray-Berthat V, Bonduelle O, Alvarez-Fischer D, Callebert J, Launay JM, et al. Infiltration of CD4+ lymphocytes into the brain contributes to neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Parkinson disease. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:182–192. doi: 10.1172/JCI36470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Grozdanov V, Bliederhaeuser C, Ruf WP, Roth V, Fundel-Clemens K, Zondler L, Brenner D, Martin-Villalba A, Hengerer B, Kassubek J, et al. Inflammatory dysregulation of blood monocytes in Parkinson’s disease patients. Acta Neuropathol 2014; 128:651–663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Harms AS, Ferreira SA, Romero-Ramos M. Periphery and brain, innate and adaptive immunity in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2021;141:527–545. doi: 10.1007/s00401-021-02268-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schonhoff AM, Williams GP, Wallen ZD, Standaert DG, Harms AS. Innate and adaptive immune responses in Parkinson’s disease. Prog Brain Res. 2020;252:169–216. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Williams-Gray CH, Wijeyekoon RS, Scott KM, Hayat S, Barker RA, Jones JL. Abnormalities of age-related T cell senescence in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:166. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1206-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Calopa M, Bas J, Callen A, Mestre M. Apoptosis of peripheral blood lymphocytes in Parkinson patients. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;38:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Scott KM, Kouli A, Yeoh SL, Clatworthy MR, Williams-Gray CH. A systematic review and meta-analysis of alpha synuclein auto-antibodies in Parkinson’s Disease. Front Neurol. 2018;9:815. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sulzer D, Alcalay RN, Garretti F, Cote L, Kanter E, Agin-Liebes J, Liong C, McMurtrey C, Hildebrand WH, Mao X, et al. T cells from patients with Parkinson’s disease recognize alpha-synuclein peptides. Nature. 2017;546:656–661. doi: 10.1038/nature22815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saiki M, Baker A, Williams-Gray CH, Foltynie T, Goodman RS, Taylor CJ, Compston DA, Barker RA, Sawcer SJ, Goris A. Association of the human leucocyte antigen region with susceptibility to Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:890–891. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.162883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nalls MA, Pankratz N, Lill CM, Do CB, Hernandez DG, Saad M, DeStefano AL, Kara E, Bras J, Sharma M, et al. Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson's disease. Nat Genet. 2014;46:989–993. doi: 10.1038/ng.3043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lindestam Arlehamn CS, Dhanwani R, Pham J, Kuan R, Frazier A, Rezende Dutra J, Phillips E, Mallal S, Roederer M, Marder KS, et al. alpha-Synuclein-specific T cell reactivity is associated with preclinical and early Parkinson's disease. Nat Commun. 1875;2020:11. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15626-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fiszer U, Mix E, Fredrikson S, Kostulas V, Link H. Parkinson's disease and immunological abnormalities: increase of HLA-DR expression on monocytes in cerebrospinal fluid and of CD45RO+ T cells in peripheral blood. Acta Neurol Scand. 1994;90:160–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb02699.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fiszer U, Mix E, Fredrikson S, Kostulas V, Olsson T, Link H. gamma delta+ T cells are increased in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 1994;121:39–45. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(94)90154-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bas J, Calopa M, Mestre M, Mollevi DG, Cutillas B, Ambrosio S, Buendia E. Lymphocyte populations in Parkinson’s disease and in rat models of parkinsonism. J Neuroimmunol. 2001;113:146–152. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(00)00422-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hisanaga K, Asagi M, Itoyama Y, Iwasaki Y. Increase in peripheral CD4 bright+ CD8 dull+ T cells in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1580–1583. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.10.1580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baba Y, Kuroiwa A, Uitti RJ, Wszolek ZK, Yamada T. Alterations of T-lymphocyte populations in Parkinson disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005;11:493–498. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2005.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gruden MA, Sewell RD, Yanamandra K, Davidova TV, Kucheryanu VG, Bocharov EV, Bocharova OA, Polyschuk VV, Sherstnev VV, Morozova-Roche LA. Immunoprotection against toxic biomarkers is retained during Parkinson’s disease progression. J Neuroimmunol. 2011;233:221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saunders JA, Estes KA, Kosloski LM, Allen HE, Dempsey KM, Torres-Russotto DR, Meza JL, Santamaria PM, Bertoni JM, Murman DL, et al. CD4+ regulatory and effector/memory T cell subsets profile motor dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2012;7:927–938. doi: 10.1007/s11481-012-9402-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stevens CH, Rowe D, Morel-Kopp MC, Orr C, Russell T, Ranola M, Ward C, Halliday GM. Reduced T helper and B lymphocytes in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroimmunol. 2012;252:95–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2012.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen S, Liu Y, Niu Y, Xu Y, Zhou Q, Xu X, Wang J, Yu M. Increased abundance of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and Th17 cells in peripheral blood of newly-diagnosed Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurosci Lett. 2017;648:21–25. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.03.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen Y, Qi B, Xu W, Ma B, Li L, Chen Q, Qian W, Liu X, Qu H. Clinical correlation of peripheral CD4+cell subsets, their imbalance and Parkinson’s disease. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12:6105–6111. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen Y, Yu M, Liu X, Qu H, Chen Q, Qian W, Wei D, Xu W, Ma B, Wu W. Clinical characteristics and peripheral T cell subsets in Parkinson’s disease patients with constipation. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:2495–2504. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sommer A, Marxreiter F, Krach F, Fadler T, Grosch J, Maroni M, Graef D, Eberhardt E, Riemenschneider MJ, Yeo GW, et al. Th17 lymphocytes induce neuronal cell death in a human iPSC-based model of Parkinson’s Disease. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23:123–131. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kustrimovic N, Comi C, Magistrelli L, Rasini E, Legnaro M, Bombelli R, Aleksic I, Blandini F, Minafra B, Riboldazzi G, et al. Parkinson’s disease patients have a complex phenotypic and functional Th1 bias: cross-sectional studies of CD4+ Th1/Th2/T17 and Treg in drug-naive and drug-treated patients. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:205. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1248-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alvarez-Luquin DD, Arce-Sillas A, Leyva-Hernandez J, Sevilla-Reyes E, Boll MC, Montes-Moratilla E, Vivas-Almazan V, Perez-Correa C, Rodriguez-Ortiz U, Espinoza-Cardenas R, et al. Regulatory impairment in untreated Parkinson’s disease is not restricted to Tregs: other regulatory populations are also involved. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16:212. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1606-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thome AD, Atassi F, Wang J, Faridar A, Zhao W, Thonhoff JR, Beers DR, Lai EC, Appel SH. Ex vivo expansion of dysfunctional regulatory T lymphocytes restores suppressive function in Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2021;7:41. doi: 10.1038/s41531-021-00188-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hu ZX, Song WN, Lu XD, Zhou ML, Shao JH. Peripheral T lymphocyte immunity and l-dopamine in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018;32:687–691. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology. 1967;17:427–442. doi: 10.1212/WNL.17.5.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Grozdanov V, Bousset L, Hoffmeister M, Bliederhaeuser C, Meier C, Madiona K, Pieri L, Kiechle M, McLean PJ, Kassubek J, et al. Increased immune activation by pathologic alpha-synuclein in Parkinson’s Disease. Ann Neurol. 2019;86:593–606. doi: 10.1002/ana.25557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sheather SJ, Jones MC. A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol) 1991;53:683–690. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B-Methodol. 1995;57:289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Langfelder P, Horvath S. Fast R functions for robust correlations and hierarchical clustering. J Stat Softw 2012; 46. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Williams GP, Schonhoff AM, Jurkuvenaite A, Gallups NJ, Standaert DG, Harms AS. CD4 T cells mediate brain inflammation and neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2021;144:2047–2059. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of Neuroinflammation are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES