Skip to main content
PMC home page
Cell Death Discovery logoLink to Cell Death Discovery
. 2021 Oct 30;7:328. doi: 10.1038/s41420-021-00722-7

FBXL10 promotes EMT and metastasis of breast cancer cells via regulating the acetylation and transcriptional activity of SNAI1

Yangyang Yang 1, Binggong Zhao 1, Linlin Lv 1, Yuxi Yang 1, Shujing Li 1,✉, Huijian Wu 1,✉
PMCID: PMC8557203  PMID: 34718323

Abstract

F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 10 (FBXL10) has been reported to play a regulatory role in the initiation and development of breast cancer. Bioinformatics analyses revealed that FBXL10 may involve in the process of cytoskeleton organization. This research aimed to investigate the function of FBXL10 in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis of breast cancer, and tried to reveal the molecular mechanism involved in this issue. Functional experiments in vitro revealed that FBXL10 promoted the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells through inhibiting E-cadherin expression and inducing EMT. Mechanical studies revealed that FBXL10 could specifically interact with SNAI1, but not Slug or ZEB1. And it promoted the transcriptional repression activity of SNAI1 on CDH1 in breast cancer cells. Furthermore, FBXL10 had a positive role for the deacetylation of SNAI1 by facilitating the interaction between SNAI1 and HDAC1, a dominating deacetylase of SNAI1. And the deacetylated SNAI1 showed a more suppressive ability to inhibit the transcription of E-cadherin. Moreover, mouse models were also conducted to confirm the effect of FBXL10 on the lung metastasis of breast cancer in vivo. Totally, our data revealed that FBXL10 served as a pro-metastatic factor in breast cancer via repressing the expression of E-cadherin and inducing EMT. It may provide a novel regulatory axis in the EMT of breast cancer.

Subject terms: Breast cancer, Epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Introduction

Breast cancer cells exhibit high heterogeneity and diverse differentiation levels, key gene mutations and aberrant activation of signaling pathways endow the cells with high motivation and aggression, which is the main cause for the lethality of carcinoma patients [1, 2]. High-grade breast cancer cells with embryonic stem-like phenotype show lower differentiation status and more flexible plasticity [1, 3], these characteristics are also required in transition states in tumor initiation and progression [4]. EMT, which was originally found in embryonic development and tissue remodeling, has been demonstrated to play a role in the invasion and metastasis of breast cancer [5, 6]. The process of EMT involves the induction of mesenchymal markers (N-cadherin and vimentin) and reduction of epithelial markers (E-cadherin and cytokeratin 18). And this process was also manufactured by the dynamic regulatory network of transcriptional factors (e.g., SNAI1 [7, 8], SLUG [9], ZEB1/2 [10], and Twist [11]) and hyperactivation of extracellular signaling pathways including transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) [12], Wnt/β-catenin [7, 13, 14], and Notch [15–17]. The application of spontaneous metastatic mouse models with fluorescent lineage labeling in vivo showed that the breast cancer cells with metastatic ability were usually undergoing EMT and simultaneously coupled with E-cadherin loss or downregulation [18–20]. In addition, subpopulation of metastatic tumor cells also displayed up-regulation or hyperactivation of EMT-related transcriptional factors [18, 21]. SNAI1, known as a canonical transcription suppressor, activates the EMT program and plays a vital role in fibrosis, embryogenesis and cancer progression [7, 8, 22]. It can directly bind to E-box motif of epithelial genes promoters (e.g., E-cadherin) through its C‑terminal zinc‑finger domains, and then the transcription initiates through recruiting the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) which is coordinated with histone modifications (e.g., methylation and acetylation at H3K4 [23], H3K9 [24, 25], and H3K27 [26, 27]). Therefore, SNAI1 is usually regarded as one of the master transcription factors of EMT and a metastatic marker in cancer progression. Furthermore, the cellular location and transcription activity of SNAI1 are largely associated with its post-translational modifications (PTMs) [11]. For example, phosphorylation of SNAI1 at two Ser-rich motifs mediated by glycogen synthase kinase‑3β (GSK3β) inactivated its transcriptional function via inducing its nuclear export and facilitated the subsequent ubiquitin-mediated degradation [28, 29]. Acetylation of SNAI1 at K146 and K187 catalyzed by CREB-binding protein (CBP) prevented the association of SNAI1 with repressor complex [30]. And in gastric cancer, bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) recognized acetylated SNAI1 and prevented its interaction with E3 ligase FBXL14 and β-Trcp1, further decreased its polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation [31]. However, the dynamic regulatory network of SNAI1 PTMs during EMT in breast cancer has not been fully illustrated, so more factors associated with modifications of SNAI1 should be identified in cancer progress.

FBXL10 (also named KDM2B), belongs to the F-box protein family, is a multiple functional protein which was reported to play a vital role in multiple physiological processes, such as senescence, cell proliferation, apoptosis, metabolism regulation and stem-phenotype maintaining [32–35]. FBXL10 cooperates with S-phase kinase-associated protein 1 (SKP1) and Cullins to form the SCF ubiquitin E3 ligase for specific recognition of proteins targeted for ubiquitination and degradation [36]. Furthermore, the JmjC and PHD domains of FBXL10 endow its demethylase activity to remove the H3K4me3 [37], H3K36me2 [38], and H3K79me2/3 [39, 40]. Studies demonstrated that high expression of FBXL10 was detected in many types of tumors, and its oncogenic function was closely associated with high aggression of cancers and poor prognosis of patients [41–43]. It has been reported that FBXL10 was overexpressed in breast cancer, knockdown of FBXL10 induced cell cycle arrest, decreased cell proliferation and tumorigenesis [43, 44]. In contrast, another research found that FBXL10 served as a tumor suppressor via regulating the ribosome biogenesis [45]. These results indicated that FBXL10 may play a diverse role in the development of breast cancer. Therefore, the defined role and regulatory mechanism of FBXL10 in the initiation and development of breast cancer still remains to be explored.

Herein, we explored the potential role and molecular mechanism of FBXL10 in the invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells, and evaluated the oncogenic function of FBXL10 and its synergistic effect on SNAI1 in EMT and breast cancer progression.

Results

FBXL10 induced EMT and invasion of breast cancer cells

Considering that FBXL10 was dysregulated in some types of solid tumors, bioinformatics analysis using UALCAN dataset (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/) was conducted based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to determine the expression of FBXL10 in breast cancer [46]. It showed higher expression of FBXL10 in breast carcinomatous tissues compared with normal tissues (Fig. 1A), and analysis based on major subtypes of breast cancer indicated that FBXL10 exhibited the highest expression levels in triple-negative breast cancer tissues compared with other less malignant subclasses (Fig. 1B). What’s more, the functional genes positively correlated with FBXL10 (Pearson Correlation Coefficient ≥ 0.5) in breast cancer (Table S1) were analyzed in Metascape (http://metascape.org/) [47]. GO enrichment and cluster analysis of biological processes showed that the associated genes of FBXL10 not only participated in cell proliferation and cell cycle, but played a vital role in regulating cytoskeleton organization (Fig. 1C, D). The emerging literature evidence demonstrated that invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells were coupled with cytoskeletal reconstruction, which process was referred to EMT [2]. Therefore, these results indicated FBXL10 may serve as an oncogenic factor in EMT and metastasis of breast cancer cells. We first detected the expression of FBXL10 in several breast cancer cell lines and normal breast epithelial cell. It showed that FBXL10 exhibited relative higher expression in the breast cancer cells with mesenchymal-like morphology and aggressive character (BT474, MDA-MB-231, and BT549) (Fig. 2A), this result was consistent with our bioinformatics analysis and Kottakis’s research reported previously [44]. They indicated that FBXL10 served as a poor prognostic factor in breast cancer and its expression may be associated with the aggressive potential of breast cancer cells [44]. To investigate the biological function of FBXL10 in the metastasis of breast cancer, cell scratch wound-healing and transwell assays were conducted in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. The results showed that overexpression of FBXL10 in MCF7 exhibited significantly enhanced migration and invasion ability (Fig. 2B, D). In contrast, knockdown of FBXL10 could markedly inhibit cell metastatic potential of MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 2C, E and Fig. S1A). These results indicated that FBXL10 could promote cell mobility and invasion of breast cancer cells. Previous studies demonstrated that the aggressive breast cancer cells had a stem-like phenotype and underwent EMT when metastasis occurred, and FBXL10 played a vital role in maintaining self-renewal of stem cell [44, 48]. Therefore, we hypothesized that FBXL10 may participate in EMT and further regulate metastasis of breast cancer. To verify our assumption, the epithelial and mesenchymal markers were examined by Western blot. As shown, significantly reduced expression of epithelial markers (E-cadherin and Cytokeratin 18), and increased mesenchymal markers (N-cadherin and Vimentin) were observed in MCF7 cells with FBXL10 overexpression (Fig. 2F). Knockdown of FBXL10 increased the expression of E-cadherin and Cytokeratin 18, while N-cadherin and Vimentin expression had decreasing trends (Fig. 2G). Totally, these data indicated that FBXL10 induced migration and invasion of breast cancer cells through modulating EMT.

Fig. 1. Bioinformatics analysis of FBXL10 and its associated genes in breast cancer.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

A, B The expression of FBXL10 in breast cancer based on sample types (A) and major subtype (B), these data were analyzed and downloaded from UALCAN database (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/). C, D. GO enrichment analysis (C) and cluster analysis (D) of biological processes of FBXL10 positively associated genes in breast cancer. The genes cluster was downloaded from UALCAN database and GO analysis was conducted with Metascape (http://metascape.org/).

Fig. 2. FBXL10 modulates breast cancer cells motility, invasion via regulating EMT.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

A Western blot detected the expression of FBXL10 in normal breast epithelial cell and different types of breast cancer cells. The relative expression of FBXL10 was normalized by GAPDH with gray level ratio analysis. B, C Scratch wound-healing assay evaluated the effect of FBXL10 overexpression or knockdown on the migration of MCF7 (B) and MDA-MB-231 (C) cells respectively. D, E Transwell assay assessed the effect of FBXL10 overexpression or knockdown on the migration and invasion of MCF7 (D) and MDA-MB-231 (E) cells respectively. The bar graph showed the number of migrating and invading cells for each category of cells with three independent replications. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. F Western blot assay tested the EMT markers (E-cadherin, Cytokeratin 18, N-cadherin and Vimentin) in MCF7 cells with FBXL10 overexpression. G Western blot tested the effect of FBXL10 knockdown with siRNAs on the expression of EMT markers in BT474 cells.

FBXL10 inhibited the expression of E-cadherin

E-cadherin not only served as a cell adhesion structure molecular, but was a vital factor in maintaining the epithelial characteristic of cells. We observed that overexpression of FBXL10 could reduce the expression of E-cadherin (Fig. 2F), and bioinformatics analysis from TCGA datasets showed that the expression of FBXL10 was negatively associated with CDH1 in breast cancer (Fig. S1B), so it provoked our thinking that whether FBXL10 could repress the expression of E-cadherin and further modulate EMT process. Initially, the reporter gene assay revealed that FBXL10 could inhibit the transcriptional activity of E-cadherin-Luc in a dose-dependent way (Fig. 3A), which indicated that FBXL10 may directly modulate the transcription of CDH1. Next, the mRNA levels of CDH1 were measured by RT-PCR in MCF7, T47D and BT474. Significantly reduced mRNA levels of CDH1 were observed when FBXL10 was overexpressed (Fig. 3B), and the repressive effect of FBXL10 on CDH1 transcription was also dose-dependent (Fig. 3C). In contrast, deletion of FBXL10 in BT474 enhanced the CDH1 mRNA levels (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, the protein levels of E-cadherin were also examined in breast cancer cells, the regulatory effect of FBXL10 on E-cadherin protein levels was consistent with its mRNA (Fig. 3E–G). These results indicated that FBXL10 could repress the transcription of CDH1.

Fig. 3. FBXL10 inhibits the expression of E-cadherin in breast cancer cells.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

A Reporter gene assay showed the effect of FBXL10 overexpression on E-cadherin luciferase activity. B, C RT-PCR assay assessed the CDH1 mRNA levels with overexpression of FBXL10 in MCF7 (B) and T47D (C) cells. The bar graph below showed the relative intensity of CDH1 mRNA normalized by GAPDH. Data are means ± SD (n = 3). **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. D RT-PCR assay tested the effect of FBXL10 knockdown with siRNA on CDH1 mRNA levels in BT474 cells. The bar graph below showed the relative intensity of CDH1 mRNA normalized by GAPDH. Data are means ± SD (n = 3). ***P < 0.001. E, F Western blot assay was performed to evaluate the E-cadherin protein levels in MCF7 (E) and T47D (F) cells with FBXL10 overexpression. The bar graph showed the relative intensity of E-cadherin protein normalized by GAPDH. Data are means ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. G Western blot assay evaluated the effect of siFBXL10 on E-cadherin protein levels in BT474 cells. The bar graph showed the relative protein density of E-cadherin protein normalized by GAPDH. Data are means ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; NS means no significant difference.

FBXL10 interacted with SNAI1

To further investigate the underlying mechanism of FBXL10 in modulating the expression of E-cadherin, the well-known transcriptional repressors of CDH1 were introduced together with FBXL10 in the reporter gene assay, it revealed that FBXL10 could enhance the repression role of the three transcriptional repressors (SNAI1, SLUG, and ZEB1) on E-cadherin-Luc activity (Fig. S1C). It suggested that FBXL10 may inhibit the transcription of CDH1 via certain classical transcriptional repressors. To verify this possibility, CoIP assays were performed to determine the interaction between them. The results showed that the exogenous protein interaction could be detected between FBXL10 with SNAI1 (Fig. 4A, B), but not with SLUG (Fig. 4C) and ZEB1 (Fig. 4D). Moreover, the association between endogenous FBXL10 and SNAI1 was also confirmed in the breast cancer cells (Fig. 4E, F). And GST-pulldown assay also revealed that the purified SNAI1 could physically interact with endogenous FBXL10 from MCF7 cells (Fig. 4G), and the immunofluorescence assay revealed that FBXL10 and SNAI1 were colocalized in the nucleus in MCF7 cells (Fig. 4H). Taken together, these results revealed that FBXL10 physically interacted with SNAI1 in breast cancer cells, but not SLUG or ZEB1.

Fig. 4. The interaction between FBXL10 and SNAI1.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

A, B CoIP assay showed the interaction between exogenous FBXL10 and SNAI1 in HEK293T cells. C, D CoIP assay was conducted to explore the interaction between FBXL10 with SLUG (C) and ZEB1 (D) in HEK293T cells. E, F. CoIP assay tested the endogenous interaction between FBXL10 and SNAI1 in ZR-75–30 cells. G GST-pulldown assay showed the purified SNAI1 had physical interaction with endogenous FBXL10 from MCF7 cells. H Immunofluorescence assay showed the colocalization of FBXL10 (red) and SNAI1 (green) in MCF7 cells.

FBXL10 enhanced the repressive effect of SNAI1 on CDH1 transcription

To further confirm whether FBXL10 could modulate CDH1 expression via SNAI1, the reporter gene assay showed that the overexpression of SNAI1 or FBXL10 alone could both significantly inhibit the E-cadherin-Luc activity, and the addition of SNAI1 and FBXL10 together showed more obviously repressive effect (Fig. 5A). And it also showed that the repressive effect of SNAI1 on E-cadherin-Luc activity was dose-dependent with the addition of FBXL10 (Fig. 5B). Moreover, the regulation of FBXL10 on E-cadherin-Luc activity was partially dependent on SNAI1, as the repressive role of FBXL10 on the E-cadherin-Luc was rescued with SNAI1 knockdown (Fig. 5C, S1D). Additionally, qPCR assays revealed that the regulatory effect of FBXL10 and SNAI1 on the CDH1 mRNA levels was consistent with the results of reporter gene assays (Fig. 5D, E). In conclusion, these results indicated that FBXL10 enhanced the transcriptional repression of SNAI1 on E-cadherin expression.

Fig. 5. FBXL10 enhanced the trans-repression of SNAI1 on CDH1.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

A, B. Reporter gene assay showed the regulation of E-cadherin luciferase activity by FBXL10 and SNAI1 overexpression. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. C Reporter gene assay showed the effect of FBXL10 cooperated with or without siSNAI1 on the E-cadherin luciferase activity. D, E. qPCR assays assessed the effect of FBXL10 and SNAI1 on CDH1 mRNA levels in MCF7 cells.

FBXL10 enhanced the interaction between SNAI1 with HDAC1 and facilitated HDAC1-mediated deacetylation of SNAI1

To explore the defined mechanism of FBXL10 and SNAI1 on the regulation of CDH1, the effect of FBXL10 on SNAI1 expression was determined by qPCR and Western blot assays. The results showed that the mRNA and protein levels of SNAI1 were not significantly affected by FBXL10 overexpression (Fig. S1E, F). As we know, the repression of SNAI1 on CDH1 transcription was largely dependent on its co-repressor HDAC1. And recent study demonstrated that SNAI1 could be acetylated by p300/CBP and deacetylated by HDAC1/2 [30]. The acetylation of SNAI1 could inhibit the formation of its repressor complex, HDAC1/2 acted as the deacetylase of SNAI1 to decrease its acetylation and further accelerate its transcriptional repressive role [30]. As FBXL10 could enhance the repression of SNAI1 on E-cadherin expression, we sought to determine whether FBXL10 could affect the interaction between SNAI1 and HDAC1 or HDAC2. To confirm this possibility, the interaction between FBXL10 and HDAC1/2 was determined by CoIP (Fig. 6A–D), and the results revealed that FBXL10 could interact with HDAC1, but not HDAC2. And the immunofluorescence assays also confirmed their co-location in nucleus (Fig. 6E). Moreover, the CoIP assay revealed that overexpressed FBXL10 could markedly promote the interaction between HDAC1 and SNAI1 (Fig. 6F). This reminded us that whether FBXL10 could modulate the acetylation of SNAI1 via HDAC1. To investigate this notion, the acetylation of SNAI1 was detected with the treatment of acetyltransferase p300. As shown, HDAC1 could significantly reduce the acetylation of SNAI1, and the addition of FBXL10 enhanced the HDAC1-mediated deacetylation of SNAI1 (Fig. 6G). Moreover, the endogenous SNAI1 acetylation levels were also decreased under overexpression of FBXL10 (Fig. 6H). The reporter gene assay also demonstrated that HDAC1 and SNAI1 showed more inhibitory effect on the activity of E-cadherin-Luc, and FBXL10 could enhance this effect (Fig. 6I). The specific HDAC1 inhibitor MS-275 was introduced to further evaluate whether the function of FBXL10 was dependent on HDAC1. The results showed that inhibition of HDAC1 could partially impair the effect of FBXL10 on the metastatic ability of MCF7 cells (Fig. 6J). Totally, these results revealed that FBXL10 could accelerate the recruitment of HDAC1 to SNAI1 and facilitate HDAC1-mediated deacetylation of SNAI1, accompanied with increased SNAI1 transcriptional repressive role on CDH1.

Fig. 6. FBXL10 enhanced the interaction between SNAI1 with HDAC1 and facilitated HDAC1-mediated deacetylation of SNAI1.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

A–C CoIP assay showed the association between exogenous FBXL10 with HDAC1 and HDAC2. D CoIP assay showed the endogenous protein interaction between FBXL10 and HDAC1. E. Immunofluorescence assay showed the colocalization of FBXL10 (red) and HDAC1 (green) in MCF7 cells. F CoIP assay showed the effect of FBXL10 overexpression on the interaction between SNAI1 and HDAC1. G CoIP assay showed the effect of FBXL10 on HDAC1-mediated deacetylation of exogenous SNAI1. H CoIP assay showed the effect of overexpression FBXL10 on endogenous SNAI1 acetylation. I Reporter gene assay assessed the effect of FBXL10/SNAI1/HDAC1 on the E-cadherin luciferase activity. J Transwell assay was performed to evaluate the effect of FBXL10 and HDAC1 inhibitor MS-275(1 μM for 12 h) on the migration and invasion of MCF7 cells.

FBXL10 enhanced the metastasis of breast cancer cells in vivo

As E-cadherin is necessary for lung metastasis in breast cancer cells [20], and FBXL10 significantly repressed the E-cadherin transcription, the role of FBXL10 on metastasis of breast cancer was evaluated in vivo by using the mouse model. Murine basal-like breast cancer cells 4T1 with stable Luciferase expression were intravenously injected into BALB/C mice to simulate the metastasis of breast cancer cells in circulation. As expected, quantitative bioluminescence imaging showed that the mice injected with 4T1-Luc cells transfected with shFXBL10 showed less metastatic event in lung compared with the control group (Fig. 7A). The images of lungs that were obtained after the mouse was sacrificed also showed lower bioluminescence and metastases (Fig. 7B). And the group treated with shFBXL10 exhibited less body loss (Fig. 7C). In addition, the Western blot assay verified the effective knockdown of FBXL10 with shFBXL10 in 4T1-luc cells (Fig. 7D). In conclusion, these results demonstrated that FBXL10 served as a pro-metastatic factor of breast cancer cells in vivo.

Fig. 7. FBXL10 enhanced the metastasis of breast cancer cells in mouse model.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

A Quantitative bioluminescence imaging showed the effect of shFBXL10 on the metastasis potential of 4T1-luc cells in BALB/C mice. B Bioluminescence imaging showed the relative metastasis potential of 4T1-luc cells in lung of BALB/C mice. C Line bar image showed the body weight of BALB/C mice injected with 4T1-luc cells stably transfected with shCtrl or shFBXL10. D Western blot showed the expression levels of FBXL10 in the 4T1-luc transfected with shCtrl or shFBXL10.

Discussion

FBXL10 has been reported to be overexpressed in gynecological tumors, but its role in tumorigenesis and progression was still controversial [41, 43, 44]. Kottakis et al. and our previous research demonstrated that FBXL10 served as an oncogene to promote the self-renewal and proliferation of breast cancer cells via regulating multiple factors including miRNAs/PRC1/PRC2 axis and estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα)/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-beta (PGC1-β) signaling [43, 44]. Additional, genomics functional screening found that FBXL10 was also associated with anti-estrogen resistance in breast cancer [49]. Nevertheless, another study revealed that FBXL10 knockdown triggered a more aggressive phenotype in breast cancer, and mechanism investigation demonstrated that FBXL10 acted as a tumor suppressor through regulating ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis [45]. Therefore, the definite function of FBXL10 in the initiation and development of breast cancer needs more research to be fully illustrated. In this study, we explored a novel mechanism of FBXL10 involved in the invasion and metastasis of breast cancer. Firstly, we revealed that FBXL10 enhanced the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells via regulating EMT, which plays vital role in the metastasis of breast cancer. Secondly, we found that FBXL10 decreased the E-cadherin transcription expression by enhancing the repressive function of SNAI1. Thirdly, molecular mechanism investigation revealed that FBXL10 physically interacted with SNAI1 and decreased its acetylation via promoting the interaction between SNAI1 and HDAC1. Finally, mice model was used to evaluate the role of FBXL10 on metastasis of breast cancer cells in vivo, knockdown of FBXL10 significantly suppressed the lung metastasis of breast cancer. Totally, this study highlighted the function of FBXL10 in EMT and the metastasis of breast cancer, which may contribute novel insight of FBXL10 in the development of breast cancer.

EMT is a dynamic cellular process with a change of cell morphology and function [5, 50]. During EMT, cell conjunction and cell-extracellular matrix interactions of epithelial-like cells are reprogrammed, which induces the loss of cell-cell adhesion and detachment of cellular basal membrane, and accompanied with novel transcription regulation activation to drive the mesenchymal phenotype [23]. Through the research of EMT in many types of tumors, the conversion from epithelial-like to mesenchymal-like was always not complete and continued [4]. The incomplete transition was referred to partial EMT, subpopulation of mammary tumor cells displaying different degree of epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes, which was termed as mixed or hybrid EMT [4]. And the mix or hybrid EMT was essential for tumorigenesis of basal-like breast cancer [51]. Although our study revealed a positive role of FBXL10 in EMT, whether this progress was intended to complete EMT or hybrid EMT was still unclear. Therefore, the single-cell technology or fluorescence-labeled cells with real-time detection system were required to answer this question in the future.

FBXL10 could also function as a histone demethylase, and remove the H3K4me3, H3K36me2 and H3K79me2/3 of CpG island to regulate the chromatin conformation [37–40]. The regulation of E-cadherin transcription was largely affected by promoter methylation, heterogeneous E-cadherin promoter methylation was found in the early and invasive stage of breast cancer [52]. Whether FBXL10 could bind to CpG island of E-cadherin promoter and affect its gene expression through methylation regulation, this issue also needs to be explored in follow-up research. In addition, the initiation and development of EMT are mediated by complex signaling crosstalks, whether FBXL10 could play a role in canonical signaling pathways involved in EMT such as TGF-β [12] and Wnt/β-catenin [13], this question is also deserved investigation. Our study and other study showed that FBXL10 was overexpressed in breast cancer, the upstream factors or signals that triggered the higher expression of FBXL10 in mammary tumors still need to be addressed. E-cadherin served as a cell adhesion structure molecular and a mediator of cellular signaling transduction, the expression of E-cadherin was not only dependent on the transcriptional regulation, but also its post-translational modifications, including glycosylation [53], phosphorylation [54] and ubiquitination [55]. Zhou et al. showed that N-glycosylation of E-cadherin at Asn-637 was essential for its expression, folding and trafficking [53, 55]. Ubiquitination of E-cadherin mediated by SCF complex containing SKP2 or CBLL1/HAKAI directly triggered its proteasome degradation, which process required prior phosphorylation of E-cadherin by CK1/CSNK1A1 [54]. FBXL10 cooperates with SKP1 and forms the SCF ubiquitin E3 ligase to mediate protein degradation [36], whether FBXL10 could collaborate with SKP1 or SKP2 to regulate the ubiquitination of E-cadherin remains to be explored.

Totally, we explored a potential mechanism that FBXL10/SNAI1/HDAC1 axis promoted EMT and metastasis of breast cancer cells. The specific interaction between FBXL10 and SNAI1 enhanced the repressive role of SNAI1 on CDH1 by facilitating HDAC1-mediated deacetylation of SNAI1. This present evidence may contribute a better understanding of FBXL10 and SNAI1 in metastasis of breast cancer, it may provide a novel therapeutic approach to develop the targeted drugs or inhibitors for the treatment of breast cancer.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Human embryonic kidney HEK293T, and breast cancer cell lines MCF7, T47D, ZR-75-1, ZR-75-30 and MDA-MB-231 were previously described in our published studies [43, 56]. MCF7 were cultured in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin-streptomycin and 0.01 mg/ml human recombinant insulin. T47D were cultured in complete RPMI-1640 medium in addition to 2 Units/mL bovine insulin. ZR-75-1 and ZR-75-30 were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. BT474 and BT549 were kindly provided by Dr. Zhaowei Xu of Binzhou Medical University and cultured in RPMI-1640 completed culture. Murine basal-like breast cancer cell 4T1 stably expressed Luciferase was cultured in RPMI-1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum [57]. Breast normal epithelial cell MCF10A was cultured in DMEM/F12 medium containing 5% horse serum, 20 ng/ml EGF, 0.5 μg/ml hydrocortisone, 100 ng/ml cholera toxin, 10 μg/ml insulin and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. All of the cell lines were maintained at 37 °C in humid incubator with 5% CO2.

Antibodies and reagents

FBXL10 rabbit polyclonal antibody (09–864) was purchased from Merck Millipore. Rabbit monoclonal antibodies against SNAI1 (3879), E-cadherin (3195), N-cadherin (13116), Vimentin (5741) and acetylated-lysine (9441) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology. Rabbit monoclonal antibody against Cytokeratin 18 (ab133272) was obtained from Abcam. GAPDH (sc-47724) and rabbit polyclonal p300 (sc-585) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Flag (F7425) and MYC (SAB5700727) antibodies were purchased from Sigma. GFP (GTX113617) and HA (GTX115044) were obtained from GeneTex. Protein A/G and Flag-affinity magnetic beads were purchased from Biomake. GFP-selector (2-9131-020) beads were obtained from IBA Life Sciences. MS-275 (S1503) was purchased from Selleck.

Plasmids and transfection

The human FBXL10 expression plasmid was used as previously described [43]. The GFP-SNAI1, HA-SLUG, Flag-ZEB1, Myc-HDAC1 and Myc-HDAC2 were constructed from our lab [58]. p300 plasmid was mentioned in our previous study [56]. For HEK293T, polyetherimide was used for transfection reagent. Breast cancer cells were transfected with jetPRIME transfection reagent (Polyplus, 114-15) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The siRNAs for human FBXL10 were obtained from Hippobiotec, the sequences were listed: 5′-GCAAACAGAGUGACAUCUUTT-3′ (#1 sense), 5′-AAGAUGUCACUCUGUUUGCCT-3′ (#1 antisense); 5′-GGACCCAUCUCACUGAGUUTT-3′ (#2 sense), 5′-AACUCAGUGAGAUGGGUCCAT-3′ (#2 antisense); 5′-CCAUCUGCAAUGAAAUCAUTT-3′ (#3 sense), 5′-AUGAUUUCAUUGCAGAUGGAG-3′ (#3 antisense). The sequences of siRNAs targeted for SNAI1 were listed: 5′-CCACUCAGAUGUCAAGAAGUA-3′ (#1 sense), 5′- UACUUCUUGACAUCUGAGUGG-3′ (#1 antisense); 5′-CCAAUCGGAAGCCUAACUACA-3′ (#2 sense), 5′-UGUAGUUAGGCUUCCGAUUGG-3′ (#2 antisense). The targeted sequence of shRNA for mouse FBXL10 was 5′-GCTGTGGAAATATCTGTCATA-3′, shRNAs were constructed using pRNAT-U6.1/Hygro.

CoIP, GST-pulldown, and Western blot

CoIP and Western blot were performed as described in the previous study [43]. GST-SNAI1 plasmid was constructed with pGEX-4T-2, the GST-SNAI1 purification was carried out as described previously [58]. The GST-pulldown was performed using Pierce® GST Spin Purification Kit (ThermoFisher, 16106) according to the manufacture instruction. Cells were lysed with the RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and protease inhibitor cocktail (Biomake)). After centrifugation at 12, 000 g for 15 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was incubated with the indicated antibody or with control IgG and Protein A/G at 4 °C for 4 h. After centrifugation at 3,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was abandoned and the precipitate was subjected to wash three times with washing buffer. Then the pellets were suspended with protein 2 × loading buffer, boiling at 100 °C for 5 min and subjected to SDS-PAGE. After electrophoresis, proteins were separated and blotted onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore). Membranes were probed with the specific primary antibody and then peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. The bands were visualized by chemiluminescence.

Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence assay was performed as described previously [43, 57, 58]. The cells transfected with GFP-SNAI1, Flag-FBXL10 and Myc-HDAC1 were seeded into 35 mm dishes with glass-bottom. After being fixed with 4% formaldehyde, Flag-tagged (1:200) and Myc-tagged (1:200) antibodies were incubated against the Flag-FBXL10 and Myc-HDAC1 respectively. The nucleus was stained with DAPI. The images shown were all captured with 40 × magnification.

Transwell and scratch wound-healing assays

Transwell and scratch wound-healing assays were carried out as our previous study reported [57]. In order to eliminate the effect of FBXL10 on the proliferation of breast cancer, the cells were subjected to starvation for 24 h with a culture medium containing 2% FBS, and then harvested to evaluate the metastatic potential. 1 × 105 cells were seeded into 6-well plate to perform the scratch wounding-healing assays with 2% FBS supplemented culture medium. The apical chambers for invasion evaluation of transwell were pre-packaged with Matrigel (Corning BioInc, USA), 4 × 104 and 8 × 104 cells/100 μl were seeded in transwell apical chamber with minimum medium for migration and invasion assays respectively, and basolateral chambers were incubated with complete culture medium. The images were captured at indicated times after crystal violet staining.

Luciferase reporter gene assay

The luciferase reporter gene assay was performed as previously described [43]. Cells transfected with the appropriate plasmids were harvested with lysis buffer and the relative luciferase activity was measured by the Centro LB 960. β-galactosidase was used to normalize the relative activity.

RNA isolation and real-time PCR

RNAios Plus (Takara, 9109) was used for RNA isolation, the procedure was performed as described previously [43]. The PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (Takara, RR036A) and TB Green® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Takara, RR820A) were used for reverse transcription and qPCR reaction respectively. The specific primers for real-time PCR were listed: GAPDH, 5′-GGGTTGAACCATGAGAAGT-3′ (Forward), 5′-GACTGTGGTCATGAGTCCT-3′(reverse); CDH1, 5′-GGGTGTCGAGGGAAAAATAGG-3′ (Forward), 5′-CGAGAGCTACACGTTCACGG-3′(reverse); FBXL10, 5′- AGCCGGTCACCCATCTATGAA-3′ (Forward), 5′- CTTCTGTGTTCTCTCGAATGGTC-3′(reverse); SNAI1, 5′-GGGTTGAACCATGAGAAGT-3′ (Forward), 5′-GCACTGGTACTTCTTGACATCTG-3′(reverse). GAPDH was set as a reference gene for the normalization of targeted genes.

Mice metastasis model and quantitative bioluminescence imaging

In vivo mice metastasis model was constructed as previously described [58–60]. Briefly, mice were randomly allocated to two groups according to body weight, each group had 5 units. 1 × 106 4T1-Luc murine breast cancer cells in 100 μl PBS buffer were injected into the tail vein of the 5–6 weeks female BALB/c mice. The body weights of each group were monitored every day after injection. On the 9th day, firefly luciferase bioluminescence signals of the 4T1/Luc cells were analyzed. Intraperitoneal injection of D-luciferin (BD Pharmingen, 556888) solution in D-PBS (Solarbio, D1040) buffer at 150 mg Luciferin/kg body weight for bioluminescence imaging using IVIS®Spectrum CT imaging system (PerkinElmer). Then, the mice were sacrificed under anesthesia and the lungs were removed surgically for bioluminescence imaging. All the animal experiments were performed according to the regulation set by the Ethics Committee for Biology and Medical Science of Dalian University of Technology.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 8 software was used for data analyse and data were presented as the mean ± standard error bar of mean (SEM) or the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Each experiment was independently conducted at least three times. Two-tailed t-test to evaluate the statistical significance. Significance was expressed as a P-value, differences were considered significant when p < 0.05. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; and non-significant differences were presented as NS.

Supplementary information

Figure S1 (2.1MB, tif)
Supplementary table 1 (49.7KB, xlsx)
Supplementary materials (13.8KB, docx)
Related Manuscript File (13.2KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We expressed our gratitude to Dr. Xudong Wu (Tianjin Medical University, China) for the generous gift of FBXL10 plasmid. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872263, 81672792 to HW) and the Department of Science & Technology of Liaoning Province (Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program to HW).

Author contributions

Yangyang Yang and H.W. conceived and designed the study. Y.Y. performed the experiments and completed the original draft. B.Z., L.L., Y.L., Yuxi Yang and S.L. made formal analysis, data collection, and revised the manuscript. Yangyang Yang, S.L. and H.W. reviewed and revised the paper. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

12/5/2022

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41420-022-01265-1

Contributor Information

Shujing Li, Email: lsj@dlut.edu.cn.

Huijian Wu, Email: wuhj@dlut.edu.cn.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41420-021-00722-7.

References

  • 1.Morel AP, Lièvre M, Thomas C, Hinkal G, Ansieau S, Puisieux A. Generation of breast cancer stem cells through epithelial-mesenchymal transition. PloS ONE. 2008;3:e2888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lambert AW, Pattabiraman DR, Weinberg RA. Emerging biological principles of metastasis. Cell. 2017;168:670–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shibue T, Weinberg RA. EMT, CSCs, and drug resistance: the mechanistic link and clinical implications. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:611–29. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bakir B, Chiarella AM, Pitarresi JR, Rustgi AK. EMT, MET, plasticity, and tumor metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30:764–76. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:178–96. doi: 10.1038/nrm3758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Investig. 2009;119:1420–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI39104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stemmer V, de Craene B, Berx G, Behrens J. Snail promotes Wnt target gene expression and interacts with beta-catenin. Oncogene. 2008;27:5075–80. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grande MT, Sánchez-Laorden B, López-Blau C, De Frutos CA, Boutet A, Arévalo M, et al. Snail1-induced partial epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition drives renal fibrosis in mice and can be targeted to reverse established disease. Nat Med. 2015;21:989–97. doi: 10.1038/nm.3901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barrallo-Gimeno A, Nieto MA. The Snail genes as inducers of cell movement and survival: implications in development and cancer. Development. 2005;132:3151–61. doi: 10.1242/dev.01907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sánchez-Tilló E, Lázaro A, Torrent R, Cuatrecasas M, Vaquero EC, Castells A, et al. ZEB1 represses E-cadherin and induces an EMT by recruiting the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling protein BRG1. Oncogene. 2010;29:3490–3500. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Peinado H, Olmeda D, Cano A. Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: an alliance against the epithelial phenotype? Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:415–28. doi: 10.1038/nrc2131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hao Y, Baker D, Ten Dijke P. TGF-β-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:2767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Klaus A, Birchmeier W. Wnt signalling and its impact on development and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:387–98. doi: 10.1038/nrc2389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhan T, Rindtorff N, Boutros M. Wnt signaling in cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36:1461–73. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bray SJ. Notch signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17:722–35. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Natsuizaka M, Whelan KA, Kagawa S, Tanaka K, Giroux V, Chandramouleeswaran PM, et al. Interplay between Notch1 and Notch3 promotes EMT and tumor initiation in squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1758. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01500-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Blokzijl A, Dahlqvist C, Reissmann E, Falk A, Moliner A, Lendahl U, et al. Cross-talk between the Notch and TGF-beta signaling pathways mediated by interaction of the Notch intracellular domain with Smad3. J Cell Biol. 2003;163:723–8. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200305112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beerling E, Seinstra D, de Wit E, Kester L, van der Velden D, Maynard C, et al. Plasticity between epithelial and mesenchymal states unlinks EMT from metastasis-enhancing stem cell capacity. Cell Rep. 2016;14:2281–8. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Harper KL, Sosa MS, Entenberg D, Hosseini H, Cheung JF, Nobre R, et al. Mechanism of early dissemination and metastasis in Her2(+) mammary cancer. Nature. 2016;540:588–92. doi: 10.1038/nature20609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Padmanaban V, Krol I, Suhail Y, Szczerba BM, Aceto N, Bader JS, et al. E-cadherin is required for metastasis in multiple models of breast cancer. Nature. 2019;573:439–44. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1526-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bornes L, van Scheppingen RH, Beerling E, Schelfhorst T, Ellenbroek SIJ, Seinstra D, et al. Fsp1-mediated lineage tracing fails to detect the majority of disseminating cells undergoing EMT. Cell Rep. 2019;29:2565–2569. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Batlle E, Sancho E, Francí C, Domínguez D, Monfar M, Baulida J, et al. The transcription factor snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2:84–89. doi: 10.1038/35000034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lin T, Ponn A, Hu X, Law BK, Lu J. Requirement of the histone demethylase LSD1 in Snai1-mediated transcriptional repression during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Oncogene. 2010;29:4896–904. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dong C, Wu Y, Wang Y, Wang C, Kang T, Rychahou PG, et al. Interaction with Suv39H1 is critical for Snail-mediated E-cadherin repression in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2013;32:1351–62. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dong C, Wu Y, Yao J, Wang Y, Yu Y, Rychahou PG, et al. G9a interacts with Snail and is critical for Snail-mediated E-cadherin repression in human breast cancer. J Clin Investig. 2012;122:1469–86. doi: 10.1172/JCI57349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Herranz N, Pasini D, Díaz VM, Francí C, Gutierrez A, Dave N, et al. Polycomb complex 2 is required for E-cadherin repression by the Snail1 transcription factor. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:4772–81. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00323-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Peinado H, Ballestar E, Esteller M, Cano A. Snail mediates E-cadherin repression by the recruitment of the Sin3A/histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1)/HDAC2 complex. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:306–19. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.1.306-319.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhou BP, Deng J, Xia W, Xu J, Li YM, Gunduz M, et al. Dual regulation of Snail by GSK-3beta-mediated phosphorylation in control of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:931–40. doi: 10.1038/ncb1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yook JI, Li XY, Ota I, Hu C, Kim HS, Kim NH, et al. A Wnt-Axin2-GSK3beta cascade regulates Snail1 activity in breast cancer cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:1398–406. doi: 10.1038/ncb1508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hsu DS, Wang HJ, Tai SK, Chou CH, Hsieh CH, Chiu PH, et al. Acetylation of snail modulates the cytokinome of cancer cells to enhance the recruitment of macrophages. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:534–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Qin ZY, Wang T, Su S, Shen LT, Zhu GX, Liu Q, et al. BRD4 promotes gastric cancer progression and metastasis through acetylation-dependent stabilization of snail. Cancer Res. 2019;79:4869–81. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Koyama-Nasu R, David G, Tanese N. The F-box protein Fbl10 is a novel transcriptional repressor of c-Jun. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:1074–80. doi: 10.1038/ncb1628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tsukada Y, Fang J, Erdjument-Bromage H, Warren ME, Borchers CH, Tempst P, et al. Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain-containing proteins. Nature. 2006;439:811–6. doi: 10.1038/nature04433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Frescas D, Guardavaccaro D, Bassermann F, Koyama-Nasu R, Pagano M. JHDM1B/FBXL10 is a nucleolar protein that represses transcription of ribosomal RNA genes. Nature. 2007;450:309–13. doi: 10.1038/nature06255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ge R, Wang Z, Zeng Q, Xu X, Olumi AF. F-box protein 10, an NF-κB-dependent anti-apoptotic protein, regulates TRAIL-induced apoptosis through modulating c-Fos/c-FLIP pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:1184–95. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Han XR, Zha Z, Yuan HX, Feng X, Xia YK, Lei QY, et al. KDM2B/FBXL10 targets c-Fos for ubiquitylation and degradation in response to mitogenic stimulation. Oncogene. 2016;35:4179–90. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Janzer A, Stamm K, Becker A, Zimmer A, Buettner R, Kirfel J. The H3K4me3 histone demethylase Fbxl10 is a regulator of chemokine expression, cellular morphology, and the metabolome of fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:30984–92. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.341040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tzatsos A, Paskaleva P, Lymperi S, Contino G, Stoykova S, Chen Z, et al. Lysine-specific demethylase 2B (KDM2B)-let-7-enhancer of zester homolog 2 (EZH2) pathway regulates cell cycle progression and senescence in primary cells. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:33061–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.257667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.He J, Kallin EM, Tsukada Y, Zhang Y. The H3K36 demethylase Jhdm1b/Kdm2b regulates cell proliferation and senescence through p15(Ink4b) Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:1169–75. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kang JY, Kim JY, Kim KB, Park JW, Cho H, Hahm JY, et al. KDM2B is a histone H3K79 demethylase and induces transcriptional repression via sirtuin-1-mediated chromatin silencing. FASEB J. 2018;32:5737–50. doi: 10.1096/fj.201800242R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kuang Y, Lu F, Guo J, Xu H, Wang Q, Xu C, et al. Histone demethylase KDM2B upregulates histone methyltransferase EZH2 expression and contributes to the progression of ovarian cancer in vitro and in vivo. OncoTargets Ther. 2017;10:3131–44. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S134784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tzatsos A, Paskaleva P, Ferrari F, Deshpande V, Stoykova S, Contino G, et al. KDM2B promotes pancreatic cancer via Polycomb-dependent and -independent transcriptional programs. J Clin Investig. 2013;123:727–39. doi: 10.1172/JCI64535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yang Y, Li S, Li B, Li Y, Xia K, Aman S, et al. FBXL10 promotes ERRα protein stability and proliferation of breast cancer cells by enhancing the mono-ubiquitylation of ERRα. Cancer Lett. 2021;502:108–19. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kottakis F, Foltopoulou P, Sanidas I, Keller P, Wronski A, Dake BT, et al. NDY1/KDM2B functions as a master regulator of polycomb complexes and controls self-renewal of breast cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3935–46. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Galbiati A, Penzo M, Bacalini MG, Onofrillo C, Guerrieri AN, Garagnani P, et al. Epigenetic up-regulation of ribosome biogenesis and more aggressive phenotype triggered by the lack of the histone demethylase JHDM1B in mammary epithelial cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:37091–103. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chandrashekar DS, Bashel B, Balasubramanya SAH, Creighton CJ, Ponce-Rodriguez I, Chakravarthi B, et al. UALCAN: a portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses. Neoplasia. 2017;19:649–58. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhou Y, Zhou B, Pache L, Chang M, Khodabakhshi AH, Tanaseichuk O, et al. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1523. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.He J, Shen L, Wan M, Taranova O, Wu H, Zhang Y. Kdm2b maintains murine embryonic stem cell status by recruiting PRC1 complex to CpG islands of developmental genes. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15:373–84. doi: 10.1038/ncb2702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.van Agthoven T, Sieuwerts AM, Meijer D, Meijer-van Gelder ME, van Agthoven TL, Sarwari R, et al. Selective recruitment of breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance genes and relevance for breast cancer progression and tamoxifen therapy response. Endocr-Relat Cancer. 2010;17:215–30. doi: 10.1677/ERC-09-0062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dongre A, Weinberg RA. New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:69–84. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0080-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kröger C, Afeyan A, Mraz J, Eaton EN, Reinhardt F, Khodor YL, et al. Acquisition of a hybrid E/M state is essential for tumorigenicity of basal breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116:7353–62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812876116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Graff JR, Gabrielson E, Fujii H, Baylin SB, Herman JG. Methylation patterns of the E-cadherin 5’ CpG island are unstable and reflect the dynamic, heterogeneous loss of E-cadherin expression during metastatic progression. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:2727–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.4.2727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhou F, Su J, Fu L, Yang Y, Zhang L, Wang L, et al. Unglycosylation at Asn-633 made extracellular domain of E-cadherin folded incorrectly and arrested in endoplasmic reticulum, then sequentially degraded by ERAD. Glycoconj J. 2008;25:727–40. doi: 10.1007/s10719-008-9133-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mukherjee M, Chow SY, Yusoff P, Seetharaman J, Ng C, Sinniah S, et al. Structure of a novel phosphotyrosine-binding domain in Hakai that targets E-cadherin. EMBO J. 2012;31:1308–19. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Inuzuka H, Gao D, Finley LW, Yang W, Wan L, Fukushima H, et al. Acetylation-dependent regulation of Skp2 function. Cell. 2012;150:179–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Xu Z, Yang Y, Li B, Li Y, Xia K, Yang Y, et al. Checkpoint suppressor 1 suppresses transcriptional activity of ERα and breast cancer cell proliferation via deacetylase SIRT1. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:559. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0629-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bai XY, Li S, Wang M, Li X, Yang Y, Xu Z, et al. Krüppel-like factor 9 down-regulates matrix metalloproteinase 9 transcription and suppresses human breast cancer invasion. Cancer Lett. 2018;412:224–35. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhao F, Wang M, Li S, Bai X, Bi H, Liu Y, et al. DACH1 inhibits SNAI1-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition and represses breast carcinoma metastasis. Oncogenesis. 2015;4:e143. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2015.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Elkin M, Vlodavsky I. Tail vein assay of cancer metastasis. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2001;Chapter 19:19 12 11–19 12 17. doi: 10.1002/0471143030.cb1902s12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rashid OM, Nagahashi M, Ramachandran S, Dumur CI, Schaum JC, Yamada A, et al. Is tail vein injection a relevant breast cancer lung metastasis model? J Thorac Dis. 2013;5:385–92. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.06.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1 (2.1MB, tif)
Supplementary table 1 (49.7KB, xlsx)
Supplementary materials (13.8KB, docx)
Related Manuscript File (13.2KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Cell Death Discovery are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES