Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1999 Oct;37(10):3380–3383. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.10.3380-3383.1999

Antibiotic Susceptibilities of Group C and Group G Streptococci Isolated from Patients with Invasive Infections: Evidence of Vancomycin Tolerance among Group G Serotypes

Theoklis Zaoutis 1,2, Barbara Schneider 3, Lynn Steele Moore 3, Joel D Klein 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC85574  PMID: 10488212

Abstract

A retrospective review of medical records for 32 patients with invasive group C streptococcus (GCS) or group G streptococcus (GGS) infections was performed. MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of penicillin, erythromycin, and vancomycin for all isolates were obtained. Tolerance of vancomycin, defined as an MBC 32 or more times higher than the MIC, was exhibited by 18 GGS isolates (54%). The identification of tolerance in clinical isolates of GGS and GCS may have clinical implications in treating these seriously ill patients.


There is increasing interest in the role of Lancefield group C streptococci (GCS) and group G streptococci (GGS) as emerging nosocomial and opportunistic pathogens (31, 35). The spectrum of human infection caused by these organisms includes primary and secondary bacteremia in normal and immunocompromised hosts, as well as cellulitis, endocarditis, skin and wound infections, meningitis, arthritis, osteomyelitis, pneumonia, abscesses, puerperal infections, and pharyngitis (2, 411, 1316, 19, 20, 26, 31, 35).

Besides being classified by the Lancefield group carbohydrate, the β-hemolytic streptococci are subdivided on the basis of whether they form large colonies or small colonies on sheep blood agar plates (BAP) (6, 7, 10, 13, 15). The large-colony phenotypes of group A and group B are associated with the pathogenic species Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae. Similarly, GCS and GGS large-colony phenotypes are those usually associated with human infection. GCS and GGS are classified in the same subspecies, Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis subsp. nov. (34), and are termed S. pyogenes-like because these species share a number of virulence factors with group A streptococci (S. pyogenes). Small- colony-forming species are placed in the Streptococcus anginosus group (formerly known as Streptococcus milleri) and are less common causes of abscess formation and bacteremia (12, 15, 32).

The majority of GCS and GGS strains demonstrate in vitro susceptibility to penicillins, vancomycin, erythromycin, and cephalosporins (3, 30). Antimicrobial tolerance, defined as a minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) 32 or more times higher than the MIC, among GCS and GGS has been reported for penicillin and other agents (24, 27, 29). Only a few clinical isolates have been reported to exhibit tolerance of vancomycin (24, 29). We previously reported tolerance of vancomycin among pharyngeal isolates of non-group A β-hemolytic streptococci (mostly GCS and GGS) from children (36). We chose to investigate further these antibiotic susceptibility patterns among GCS and GGS isolated from patients with invasive infections (bacteremia and meningitis, etc.), for whom similar findings of tolerance may have clinical implications.

(The study was performed at the Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Del. This work was presented in part at the 97th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology held in May 1997 in Miami Beach, Fla. [37].)

At Christiana Care Health Systems a retrospective chart review was performed with 32 patients from whom GCS and GGS were isolated from sterile sites between December 1991 and March 1996. Clinical data were collected on all patients. Bacterial isolates were recovered from frozen storage (−70°C) for further evaluation. Isolate identification was performed with the API 20S Strep Strip (bioMerieux Vitek, Hazelwood, Mo.). Serotyping for GCS and GGS was performed with the PathoDx agglutination kit (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.).

MICs of penicillin, erythromycin, and vancomycin were performed by using National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) broth microdilution methods (22). Tests were performed in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with lysed horse blood (Remel; lot 5517). Dilutions tested ranged from 16 to 0.016 μg/ml for all drugs. Plates were prepared on-site (100 μl per well), and antibiotic powders were supplied by the respective manufacturers. Microtiter plates were prepared to include a positive growth control well and a medium sterility well. Plates were stored at −70°C until use and thawed completely at room temperature before inoculation. Organisms were grown in Trypticase soy broth (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.; lot 100K7DEJS) for 2 h and then maintained at a 0.5 McFarland standard. Microtiter plates were inoculated with 0.01 ml of the standardized, diluted organism suspension and then incubated at 35°C in 6% carbon dioxide for 20 h. The MIC was interpreted as the lowest concentration of drug at which no growth was visible in the microtiter well. The NCCLS breakpoints for streptococci were used to interpret MIC results (23).

Wells with no visible growth were subcultured on BAP to determine the MBC (50 μl from each well). The BAP were incubated for 24 h at 35°C in carbon dioxide. The MBC was interpreted as the lowest concentration of drug at which fewer than five colonies were observed on the BAP.

All MIC and MBC assays were performed in duplicate for reliability. Broth macrodilution methods according to NCCLS standard procedures were used to confirm MIC and MBC broth microdilution results (21, 22).

Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was used for quality control for all antimicrobials and was tested with each batch of microtiter plates. The results obtained were consistently within acceptable ranges for all drugs.

Between December 1991 and March 1996, 32 sterile-site isolates, 27 GGS and five GCS, were identified and retrieved for study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the 27 patients for whom data were available are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Clinical data for patients from whom GCS and GGS streptococci were isolateda

Patient Age (yr) Sex Underlying disease(s) and/or condition Diagnosis Isolation site(s) Outcome
1 NA NA NA NA NA NA
2 65 F Cirrhosis, leg ulcers Cellulitis/sepsis Blood Died
3 88 F CAD, CVA, HTN Pneumonia Blood Survived
4 NA NA NA NA NA NA
5 NA NA NA NA NA NA
6 82 M CAD, NIDDM Cellulitis Blood Survived
7 67 M IDDM, COPD Foot ulcer Blood Died
8 40 M HIV, IVDA Endocarditis Blood Survived
9 81 M CAD, CVA, CHF Sepsis Blood Survived
10 82 M CA, IDDM Cellulitis Blood, wound Died
11 71 M Knee replacement Arthritis Synovial fluid, blood Survived
12 34 F None Meningitis Cerebrospinal fluid Survived
13 34 M IVDA Upper extremity, abscess Abscess Survived
14 84 F CLL, CVA Cellulitis Blood Died
15 88 M IDDM, HTN Sepsis Blood Survived
16 37 M EtOH Sepsis Blood Survived
17 59 M CLL, TB, HIV Sepsis Blood Died
18 69 M NIDDM, CAD Cellulitis Blood Survived
19 50 M None Patellar bursitis Bursal fluid Survived
20 58 F SLE, NIDDM, HTN Cellulitis Blood Survived
21 55 M EtOH, seizures Cellulitis Blood Survived
22 76 F IDDM, HTN, dialysis Sepsis Blood, urine, peritoneal fluid Died
23 55 M NIDDM Cellulitis, osteomyelitis Blood, bone, skin wound Survived
24 NA NA NA NA NA NA
25 NA NA NA NA NA NA
26 67 M COPD, HTN, NIDDM Lower extremity, ulcers Blood Survived
27 71 M HTN, NIDDM Cellulitis Blood Survived
28 38 M HTN, obesity Cellulitis Blood Survived
29 85 F Breast CA, Crohn’s Cellulitis Blood Survived
30 32 M Appendicitis Abscess Blood Survived
31 70 F Diverticulitis Abscess Abscess fluid Survived
32 69 M Prostate CA, DVT Sepsis, polyarthritis Blood Survived
a

Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; HTN, hypertension; NIDDM, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; IDDM, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus infection; CHF, congestive heart failure; IVDA, intravenous drug abuse; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; CA, cancer; TB, tuberculosis; EtOH, alcohol abuse; DVT, deep-vein thrombosis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; NA, not available; M, male; F, female. 

The microbiological and antibiotic susceptibility data, including MIC and MBC broth microdilution results, are summarized in Table 2. Of the 27 GGS isolates, 23 were identified to species level as S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (large-colony phenotype), three were S. anginosus, and one isolate became nonviable prior to completion of species identification. Among the five GCG isolates, one was S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (large-colony phenotype) and four were S. anginosus. All MIC and MBC results obtained by broth macrodilution methods were nearly identical to the broth microdilution results presented in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

MICs and MBCs of penicillin, erythromycin, and vancomycin for sterile-site isolates

Isolate Serotype/species Penicillin
Erythromycin
Vancomycin
MIC (μg/ml) MBC (μg/ml) MIC (μg/ml) MBC (μg/ml) MIC (μg/ml) MBC (μg/ml)
1 G/group Ga ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 0.16 0.25 0.25
2 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 8 0.25 8b
3 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 0.25 0.25 8b
4 C/S. anginosus 0.06 0.06 ≤0.016 2 0.5 0.5
5 C/S. anginosus 0.03 0.03 ≤0.016 0.12 0.5 0.5
6 G/NAc ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 0.5 0.12 0.25
7 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 0.5 0.12 8b
8 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 >16 >16 0.25 8b
9 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 0.5 0.25 8b
10 G/NA ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 0.25 0.25 0.25
11 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 16 0.5 8
12 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 0.5 0.25 8b
13 C/S. anginosus ≤0.016 0.03 ≤0.016 4 0.5 0.5
14 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 1 0.25 8b
15 C/S. anginosus 0.06 0.06 ≤0.016 0.12 0.5 1
16 G/group G ≤0.016 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.25 16b
17 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 16 0.25 4
18 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 0.25 0.25 8b
19 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 0.5 0.12 8b
20 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 1 0.25 4
21 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 1 0.12 8b
22 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 8 0.25 8b
23 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 4 0.12 16b
24 G/S. anginosus 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.25 0.5 16b
25 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 4 0.25 2
26 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 8 0.25 8b
27 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 0.5 0.25 8b
28 C/group Ca ≤0.016 ≤0.016 4 >16 0.25 4
29 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 8 >16 0.25 4
30 G/S. anginosus 0.06 0.5 ≤0.016 2 0.5 16b
31 G/S. anginosus 0.03 0.06 ≤0.016 0.25 0.5 2
32 G/group G ≤0.016 ≤0.016 0.12 4 0.12 8b
a

Unless otherwise specified, species listed as group G or group C belong to S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis or large-colony phenotype. 

b

Vancomycin-tolerant strains. 

c

NA, not available. 

All isolates were susceptible to penicillin, and their MICs ranged from ≤0.016 to 0.06 μg/ml. The MBCs ranged between ≤0.016 and 0.5 μg/ml, with no evidence of tolerance. Three isolates, two GGS (large-colony phenotype) and one GCS (large-colony phenotype), were resistant to erythromycin (MICs > 16 μg/ml). The range of erythromycin MICs was ≤0.016 to >16 μg/ml. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (MICs between 0.12 and 0.5 μg/ml). Eighteen isolates of GGS exhibited tolerance of vancomycin (MBCs 32 or more times higher than the MICs [Table 2]).

The purpose of this study was to characterize the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of GCS and GGS isolated from sterile clinical sites. The characteristics of patients with GCS and GGS infections (predominantly bacteremia) in our study are consistent with previous reports linking these infections with underlying malignancy or immune system compromise (2, 4, 5, 9, 19, 31, 35). Given the retrospective nature of this study, no conclusions on the relationship between patient outcome and the presence of a tolerant organism can be made, because the majority of patients were at high risk and were not uniformly treated with vancomycin alone.

Our in vitro findings support the use of penicillin G as the antimicrobial agent of choice for GCS and GGS infections. All MICs were less than 0.03 μg/ml, and tolerance was not identified. All isolates in our study were susceptible to vancomycin (MICs ranging between 0.12 and 0.5 μg/ml), but 18 of 32 (54%) GGS demonstrated tolerance. No GCS isolates exhibited tolerance. Since there are few reports in the literature of GCS isolates examined for vancomycin tolerance, the significance of this difference between GCS and GGS is unclear.

Noble et al., in one of the most widely cited reports of vancomycin tolerance among GGS, reported eight of nine clinical isolates that were tolerant of vancomycin (24). Rolston et al. examined the in vitro activity of nine antimicrobial agents against 35 GGS and 26 GCS isolates from various clinical sites (29). One GGS isolate exhibited tolerance of vancomycin. The two reports in the literature of tolerance to vancomycin have shown significant variability in the percentage of tolerant GGS (eight of nine in Noble’s study and one of 35 in Rolston’s study). The causes of variability are hypothetical, given the small amount of previous data available, but may include the year of collection, geography, source of the isolate, and previous antibiotic use.

The significance of in vitro vancomycin tolerance is uncertain, and our findings do not necessarily reflect clinical efficacy. Recent evidence presented by Novak et al. demonstrates a molecular mechanism for vancomycin tolerance in S. pneumoniae. A rabbit meningitis model utilized in their studies indicated the failure of vancomycin therapy to eradicate tolerant organisms from the cerebrospinal fluid (25). Concerns about potential antibiotic tolerance in GCS and GGS and reports of clinical failures in patients with severe infections have led many authors to recommend combination therapy for synergy (aminoglycoside plus a cell wall-active agent) in the initial treatment of these patients (1, 17, 18, 27, 28, 31, 33, 35).

Our in vitro findings suggest that among high-risk patients with invasive GCS and GGS infections who cannot be treated with penicillin, tolerance of other antimicrobial agents, including vancomycin, should be closely monitored.

REFERENCES

  • 1.American Academy of Pediatrics. Non-group A or B streptococcal and enterococcal infections. In: Peter G, editor. Red book: report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 24th ed. Elk Grove Village, Ill: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1997. pp. 501–502. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Auckenthaler R, Hermans P E, Washington J A., II Group G streptococcal bacteremia: clinical study and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5:196–204. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.2.196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bayer A S, Lam K. In vitro susceptibility of group G streptococci to ten antimicrobial agents with broad Gram-positive spectra. Clin Ther. 1983;5:391–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Berenguer J, Sampedro I, Cercenado E, Baraia J, Rodriguez-Creixems M, Bouza E. Group C β-hemolytic streptococcal bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992;15:151–155. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90040-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bradley S F, Gordon J J, Baumgartner D D, Marasco W A, Kauffman C A. Group C streptococcal bacteremia: analysis of 88 cases. Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13:270–280. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.2.270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carmeli Y, Ruoff K L. Report of cases of and taxonomic considerations for large-colony-forming Lancefield group C streptococcal bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2114–2117. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.8.2114-2117.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cimolai N, Elford R W, Bryan L, Annad C, Berger P. Do the β-hemolytic non-group A streptococci cause pharyngitis? Rev Infect Dis. 1988;10:587–601. doi: 10.1093/clinids/10.3.587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Douglass E T, Septimus E J, Vartian C V. Late prosthetic joint infections due to group B and group G streptococcus: case report and review of the literature. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 1997;6:489–494. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Finch R G, Aveline A. Group G streptococcal septicaemia: clinical observations and laboratory studies. J Infect. 1984;9:126–133. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(84)90922-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Haslam D B, St. Geme J W., III . Groups C and G streptococci. In: Long S S, Pickering L K, Prober C G, editors. Principles and practice of pediatric infectious diseases. 1st ed. New York, N.Y: Churchill Livingstone; 1997. pp. 826–828. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hill H R, Wilson E, Caldwell G G, Hager D, Zimmerman R A. Epidemic of pharyngitis due to streptococci of Lancefield group G. Lancet. 1969;i:371–374. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)92713-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jacobs J A, Pietersen H G, Stobbeöingh E E, Soeterö P B. Bacteremia involving the “Streptococcus milleri” group: analysis of 19 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;19:704–713. doi: 10.1093/clinids/19.4.704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Johnson C C, Tunkel A R. β-Hemolytic (groups C and G) streptococci. In: Mandell G L, Bennett J E, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s principles and practices of infectious disease. 4th ed. New York, N.Y: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. pp. 1852–1860. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jones P D, See J. Streptococcus zooepidemicus septic arthritis: case report and review of group C streptococcal arthritis. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15:744–746. doi: 10.1093/clind/15.4.744-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kaplan E L, Gerber M A. Group A, group C, and group G beta-hemolytic streptococcal infections. In: Felgin R D, Cherry T D, editors. Textbook of pediatric infectious diseases. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: W. B. Saunders Company; 1997. pp. 1084–1088. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kuskie M R. Group C streptococcal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987;6:856–859. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198709000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lam K, Bayer A S. In vitro bactericidal synergy of gentamicin combined with penicillin G, vancomycin, or cefotaxime against group G streptococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984;26:260–262. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.2.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lam K, Bayer A S. Serious infections due to group G streptococci. Report of 15 cases with in vitro-in vivo correlations. Am J Med. 1983;75:561–570. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90434-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu C E, Jang T N, Wang F D, Wang L S, Liu C Y. Invasive group G streptococcal infections: a review of 37 cases. Chung-Hua I Hsueh Tsa Chih. 1995;56:173–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Meier F A, Centor R M, Graham L, Jr, Dalton H. Clinical and microbiologic evidence for endemic pharyngitis among adults due to group C streptococci. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:825–829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for detecting bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents. 12, no. 19. Villanova, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility test for bacteria that grow aerobically. M7A4. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) interpretive standards (μg/ml) for Streptococcus subsp. 17, no. 2. M100S7. Villanova, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Noble J T, Tyburski M B, Berman M, Greenspan J, Tennebaum M J. Antimicrobial tolerance in group G streptococcus. Lancet. 1980;ii:982. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)92143-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Novak R, Henriques B, Charpentier E, Normark S, Tuomanen E. Emergence of vancomycin tolerance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Nature. 1999;399:590–593. doi: 10.1038/21202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Obando I, Garcia-Navarrete A, Moreno M J, Chileme A. Catheter-related Streptococcus equisimilis bacteremia in a four-month-old infant with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16:910–911. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199709000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Portnoy D, Prentis J, Richards G K. Penicillin tolerance of human isolates of group C streptococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981;29:235–238. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.2.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Portnoy D, Wink I, Richards G K, Blanc M Z. Bacterial endocarditis due to a penicillin-tolerant group C streptococcus. Can Med Assoc J. 1980;122:69–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rolston K V, Chandrasekar P H, LeFrock J L. Antimicrobial tolerance in group C and G streptococci. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984;13:389–392. doi: 10.1093/jac/13.4.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rolston K V, LeFrock J L, Schell R F. Activity of nine antimicrobial agents against Lancefield group C and G streptococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982;22:930–932. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.5.930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Salata R A, Lerner P I, Shlaes D M, Gopalakrishna K V, Wolinsky E. Infections due to Lancefield group C streptococci. Medicine. 1989;68:225–239. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198907000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shlaes D M, Lerner P I, Wolinsky E, Gopalakrishna K V. Infections due to Lancefield group F and related streptococci (S. milleri, S. anginosus) Medicine. 1981;60:197–207. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198105000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stein D S, Panwalker A P. Group C streptococcal endocarditis: case report and review of the literature. Infection. 1985;6:282–285. doi: 10.1007/BF01645440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.VanDamme P, Pot B, Falsen E, Kersters K, Devriese L A. Taxonomic study of Lancefield streptococcal groups C, G, and L (Streptococcus dysgalactiae) and proposal of S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis subsp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996;46:774–781. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-3-774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vartian C, Lerner P I, Shlaes D M, Gopalakrishna K V. Infections due to Lancefield group G streptococci. Medicine. 1985;64:75–88. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198503000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zaoutis T, Klein J, Eppes S, Steele-Moore L, Schneider B, Meier F. Abstracts of the 1st World Congress of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. Acapulco, Mexico: World Society of Pediatric Infectious Disease; 1996. Resistance and tolerance in isolates of non-A β-hemolytic streptococci, abstr. E171; p. 94. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zaoutis T E, Klein J D, Eppes S C, Steele-Moore L, Schneider B. Abstracts of the 97th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1997. Antibiotic resistance and tolerance among non-group A β-hemolytic streptococci isolated from sterile clinical sites, abstr. A-86; p. 15. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES