ABSTRACT
Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most common cause of community-acquired pneumonia, causes severe invasive infections, including meningitis and bacteremia. The widespread use of macrolides has been reported to increase the prevalence of macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae (MRSP), thereby leading to treatment failure in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. However, previous studies have demonstrated that several macrolides and lincosamides have beneficial effects on MRSP infection since they inhibit the production and release of pneumolysin, a pneumococcal pore-forming toxin released during autolysis. In this regard, we previously demonstrated that the mechanisms underlying the inhibition of pneumolysin release by erythromycin involved both the transcriptional downregulation of the gene encoding pneumolysin and the impairment of autolysis in MRSP. Here, using a cell supernatant of the culture, we have shown that clarithromycin inhibits pneumolysin release in MRSP. However, contrary to previous observations in erythromycin-treated MRSP, clarithromycin upregulated the transcription of the pneumococcal autolysis-related lytA gene and enhanced autolysis, leading to the leakage of pneumococcal DNA. On the other hand, compared to erythromycin, clarithromycin significantly downregulated the gene encoding pneumolysin. In a mouse model of MRSP pneumonia, the administration of both clarithromycin and erythromycin significantly decreased the pneumolysin protein level in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and improved lung injury and arterial oxygen saturation without affecting bacterial load. Collectively, these in vitro and in vivo data reinforce the benefits of macrolides on the clinical outcomes of patients with pneumococcal pneumonia.
IMPORTANCE Pneumolysin is a potent intracellular toxin possessing multiple functions that augment pneumococcal virulence. For over 10 years, sub-MICs of macrolides, including clarithromycin, have been recognized to decrease pneumolysin production and release from pneumococcal cells. However, this study indicates that macrolides significantly slowed pneumococcal growth, which may be related to decreased pneumolysin release recorded by previous studies. In this study, we demonstrated that clarithromycin decreases pneumolysin production through downregulation of ply gene transcription, regardless of its inhibitory activity against bacterial growth. Additionally, administration of clarithromycin resulted in the amelioration of lung injury in a mouse model of pneumonia induced by macrolide-resistant pneumococci. Therefore, therapeutic targeting of pneumolysin offers a good strategy to treat pneumococcal pneumonia.
KEYWORDS: Streptococcus pneumoniae, autolysis, clarithromycin, erythromycin, lung injury, macrolides, neutrophil elastase, pneumolysin, pneumonia
INTRODUCTION
Streptococcus pneumoniae, a pneumococcus, is a Gram-positive Diplococcus and a commensal of the human nasopharynx. This bacterium commonly causes community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and otitis media. In addition to these localized infections, pneumococcus also causes severe invasive infections, including meningitis and bacteremia, which continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in children under 5 years of age (1). A major concern for the treatment of these pneumococcal diseases is the increasing resistance of S. pneumoniae to most of the commonly prescribed antibiotics, including penicillin, macrolides, and to a lesser extent, fluoroquinolones (2). Our previous study showed that among the 2,415 pneumococcal clinical isolates in Japan between 2014 and 2017, 38, 82, and 0.1% of the isolates were nonsusceptible to benzylpenicillin, azithromycin, and levofloxacin, respectively (3).
The high prevalence of macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae (MRSP) has led to the general consideration that organisms presenting with a high degree of macrolide resistance cannot be effectively treated with macrolide monotherapy (4). Although the 2007 clinical guideline of the American Thoracic Society strongly recommends macrolide monotherapy for outpatients with CAP, the 2019 guideline recommends the use of amoxicillin or doxycycline for empirical treatment and macrolides for conditional therapy only in areas where the pneumococcal resistance to macrolides is less than 25% (5). Additionally, several studies have suggested that in vitro macrolide resistance is associated with clinical treatment failure during severe pneumococcal infections (6, 7). In contrast, macrolide monotherapy has been reported to be an effective treatment option for adults with MRSP-induced CAP (8, 9). Cilloniz et al. reported that infection by MRSP did not worsen the clinical outcomes in CAP patients compared to infection by macrolide-sensitive strains (10). Additionally, treatment with macrolides has been associated with decreased mortality in patients with severe sepsis caused by MRSP (11). Therefore, although there is a contradiction between in vitro macrolide resistance and clinical outcomes, macrolides may have some beneficial effects on MRSP infection (4).
Several molecular mechanisms have been proposed to account for treatment success using macrolides. Reportedly, macrolides have immunomodulatory effects, that is, they decrease the concentration of proinflammatory cytokines and inhibit the release of superoxide anions by neutrophils (12). These effects are thought to ameliorate pulmonary function and airway infections. Furthermore, macrolides reduce pneumococcal pathogenicity by inhibiting the production and release of the pneumococcal cytotoxin, pneumolysin (PLY) (13, 14).
PLY is a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin that forms ring-like pores in host cell membranes and induces cell death, thereby augmenting pneumococcal virulence (15). A previous study reported that the PLY-negative mutants of S. pneumoniae show a significant reduction in virulence in mouse models of both pneumonia and intraperitoneal infections (16). Additionally, PLY can trigger proinflammatory responses through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR 4) (17). However, S. pneumoniae does not actively secrete PLY because it lacks the signal sequences associated with the N terminus of the protein (18). One of the mechanisms underlying PLY release involves cellular autolysis, facilitated principally by the major autolysin, LytA. In this regard, we previously demonstrated that, compared to the sub-MICs of azithromycin (15-membered macrolide), those of erythromycin (ERY; 14-membered macrolide) tend to decrease the leakage of PLY via the impairment of LytA release and downregulation of ply gene transcription (19).
Therapeutic targeting of PLY is an attractive strategy for the treatment of pneumococcal diseases (20). In addition to ERY, several antibiotics, including clarithromycin (CLR; 14-membered macrolide) and clindamycin (CLI; lincosamide), may also decrease the production of PLY in S. pneumoniae (14, 21). However, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. In this study, we first compared the in vitro efficacy of these antibiotics and roxithromycin (ROX; 14-membered macrolide) on the release of PLY by MRSP. We also analyzed the mechanisms underlying the inhibition of PLY. Furthermore, the in vivo efficacy of the antibiotics was analyzed using a mouse model of intratracheal MRSP infection.
RESULTS
Treatment with CLR markedly decreases hemolytic activity via inhibition of PLY release in the supernatant of MRSP cell culture.
Macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae strain NU4471 is highly resistant to ERY (MIC, >1,000 μg/ml) (13). Figure 1A shows that the MICs of CLI, CLR, and ROX against this MRSP strain were >100 μg/ml, indicating the high resistance of this strain to these antibiotics. However, our previous study demonstrated that even sub-MICs of ERY retarded the growth of MRSP. Therefore, we investigated the effect of macrolides and CLI on MRSP bacterial growth. Figure 1B shows that all antibiotics used in this study significantly extended the lag phase of MRSP compared to that of the untreated control.
To investigate the inhibitory effect of these antibiotics on the release of PLY after the exclusion of their inhibitory effect on bacterial growth, MRSP were incubated in the presence or absence of antibiotics until they reached the stationary phase of growth (optical density at 600 nm [OD600], 0.55; the incubation periods of the untreated control, ROX, ERY, CLI, and CLR groups were 11, 12, 14, 17, and 17 h, respectively). Subsequently, the supernatants of the cultures were collected. Fig. S1 in the supplemental material shows that neither CLR nor ERY decreased pneumococcal CFU at the stationary growth phase. It has been reported that PLY is responsible for the hemolytic activity of pneumococci (22). Likewise, supernatant of S. pneumoniae wild-type strain D39 induced hemolysis, whereas hemolytic activity was completely abrogated in supernatant of ply isogenic mutant (Δply) (Fig. 1C). Therefore, we screened for antibiotics that inhibit the release of PLY using the hemolytic activity assay. All antibiotics significantly decreased the hemolytic activity of the MRSP supernatants (Fig. 1C). Among these, ERY markedly decreased its hemolytic activity, which is consistent with previous studies (19, 21). Additionally, CLR significantly decreased the hemolytic activity of the MRSP supernatant compared to both CLI and ROX and showed a similar or better inhibitory effect on the activity compared to ERY. CLR is a derivative of ERY and differs structurally from ERY in the substitution of an O-methyl group for the hydroxy group at position 6 of the lactone ring (23). In this study, we focused on the inhibitory effects of CLR on PLY production and its mechanisms in comparison to those of a control, ERY. Consistent with the findings in the hemolytic activity assay, Western blot analysis revealed that less PLY was detected in supernatants of cultures treated with CLR and ERY than in the untreated control (Fig. 2A and B). Figure S2A shows that the antibody was specific for PLY.
CLR upregulates lytA gene transcription and increases pneumococcal autolysis.
It has been reported that pneumococcal autolysin, LytA, contributes to pathogenesis by mediating autolysis and the release of intracellular toxins, such as PLY (24, 25). Our previous study demonstrated that ERY decreases PLY leakage by inhibiting LytA release (19). Therefore, we further examined whether CLR decreased the leakage of PLY via a similar mechanism. However, contrary to our expectation, LytA protein levels were significantly increased in the supernatant of CLR-treated MRSP culture compared to that of the untreated control (Fig. 3A and B). Figure S2B shows that the antibody was specific for LytA. Reportedly, pneumococcal autolysis causes DNA leakage into the bacterial supernatant (26, 27); thus, quantification of extracellular DNA (eDNA) using real-time PCR enabled the estimation of the autolytic activity of S. pneumoniae. Indeed, the concentration of eDNA in the supernatant of the lytA mutant (ΔlytA) was markedly decreased compared to that of wild-type strain D39 (Fig. 3C). Figure 3C also shows that the CLR treatment significantly increased the concentration of eDNA compared to that of the untreated control in the supernatant of MRSP strain NU4471. Furthermore, we found that CLR treatment upregulated lytA gene transcription (Fig. 3D). Collectively, the sub-MIC (5 μg/ml) of CLR inhibits PLY release despite the activation of pneumococcal autolysis.
Compared to ERY, CLR significantly downregulates ply gene transcription and decreases hemolytic activity of pneumococcal cell lysate.
We hypothesized that the discrepancy between the activities of ERY and CLR might be due to the downregulation of ply gene transcription by CLR. Figure 4A shows that CLR significantly decreased the transcription of the gene compared to ERY. Next, we attempted to determine the PLY protein level in pneumococcal cells by Western blotting with anti-GAPDH antibody as the internal control; however, neither of the macrolides decreased the PLY protein level in the cells (data not shown), which was due to the significant downregulation of gapdh gene transcription by both CLR and ERY treatments (Fig. 4B). Additionally, macrolides significantly altered transcription of internal control gene candidates, dnaK and tuf (Fig. 4C and D). These results highlight the difficulty in identifying suitable internal control proteins in macrolide-treated pneumococci. Instead, we performed a hemolytic activity assay using bacterial cell lysates. Figure 4E shows that the hemolytic activity of CLR-treated pneumococcal lysates was significantly decreased compared to that of ERY-treated cell lysates. These findings indicate that the marked reduction in ply gene transcription results in the reduction of PLY release into the culture supernatant of CLR-treated MRSP.
Exposure of other clinical MRSP isolates to CLR results in decreased hemolytic activity in the culture supernatant despite upregulation of eDNA leakage.
Next, we investigated the effect of macrolides on clinical MRSP isolates KM2412 and KM275, which were collected from the nasopharynx of patients with acute otitis media (3). MRSP strain KM2412 showed higher MIC values to macrolides (CLR and ERY MICs of 8 and 12 μg/ml, respectively) and harbored macrolide-resistant ermB and mefA genes, and strain KM275 (CLR and ERY MICs of 4 and 8 μg/ml, respectively) harbored the ermB gene only (Fig. S3A and B). Consistent with Fig. 1B, the sub-MIC (1 μg/ml) of CLR and ERY extended the lag phase of both MRSP isolates compared to those of the untreated control (Fig. S3C). However, this concentration of macrolides did not decrease the hemolytic activity of MRSP strain KM2412 or KM275 (Fig. S4A). Therefore, we next investigated the effect of higher concentrations (2 and 4 μg/ml) of macrolides on the hemolytic activity of KM2412. Figure S4B demonstrates that both 2 and 4 μg/ml of macrolides significantly decreased the hemolytic activity of the MRSP strain KM2412 supernatants. Additionally, 4 μg/ml CLR significantly decreased the hemolytic activity compared to 2 μg/ml CLR, indicating that a higher concentration of CLR is required to suppress the hemolytic activity of MRSP. Additionally, consistent with Fig. 3C, 4 μg/ml CLR significantly increased the concentration of eDNA compared to that in the untreated control in the supernatant of MRSP strain KM2412 (Fig. S4C). Taken together, these data show that the inhibitory effect of CLR on hemolytic activity is not limited to MRSP strain NU4471.
Administration of CLR and ERY decrease PLY level in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and ameliorate lung injury in an MRSP-infected mouse model.
To compare the efficacy of CLR and ERY on MRSP-induced pneumonia in vivo, we orally administered either CLR or ERY (150 mg/kg every 12 h) to a mouse model of intratracheal MRSP infection. Figure 5A and B show that the administration of these macrolides did not directly result in a significant reduction in either viable MRSP counts or Ly-6G+ neutrophil numbers in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). However, PLY protein levels were significantly decreased in the BALF of both CLR- and ERY-treated mice compared to that of the untreated control mice (Fig. 5C to E), which is consistent with the in vitro data. PLY is recognized by Toll-like receptor 4 and induces proinflammatory cytokine production in macrophages (17). Consistent with this finding, we found that the reduction in PLY levels in CLR- and ERY-treated mice resulted in decreased interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in the BALF of these mice compared to that of the untreated control group (Fig. 5F).
We evaluated lung tissue injury by performing a histological study. We found that the lungs of MRSP-infected mice exhibited enlarged air spaces with increased infiltration of inflammatory cells at 24 h postinfection (Fig. 6A). Additional morphometric analysis revealed that the intratracheal infection caused an 80% increase (approximately) in the mean linear intercept (Lm; airspace size) of the infected mice compared to that of the uninfected group (Fig. 6B). In contrast, Lm was significantly decreased in CLR- and ERY-treated mice compared to that of the untreated control (Fig. 7A and B), indicating that both macrolides ameliorate lung injury in pneumococcal pneumonia. Reportedly, the destruction of lung parenchyma is due to the release of host proteolytic enzymes, such as neutrophil elastase (NE), from the neutrophils (28, 29). In this regard, we and other researchers have demonstrated that PLY induces neutrophil death and neutrophil extracellular trap formation, both of which lead to NE release (25, 30). Therefore, we measured NE activity in BALF using a specific substrate. Figure 6C shows that both CLR and ERY treatments decreased NE activity in BALF compared to that in the untreated control. Consistent with these findings, arterial oxygen saturation was significantly higher in both the CLR- and ERY-treated groups compared to that of the untreated control (Fig. 6D). There were no statistical differences in all parameters between the CLR- and ERY-treated groups in vivo.
Macrolides do not decrease recombinant PLY-induced NE leakage from neutrophils in vitro.
We next investigated whether CLR and ERY directly inhibit the hemolytic activity of recombinant PLY. Figure 7A shows that neither CLR nor ERY altered the hemolytic activity. Since both CLR and ERY treatments decreased NE activity in BALF (Fig. 6C), we hypothesized that these macrolides may decrease NE activity in neutrophils. Human neutrophils were exposed to 10 μg/ml PLY in the presence or absence of CLR or ERY. However, treatment of these macrolides did not alter NE activity in the supernatant from PLY-treated neutrophils (Fig. 7B). These findings suggest that these macrolides do not inhibit pore-forming activity of PLY or NE activity in neutrophils.
DISCUSSION
Previous studies have consistently indicated that several macrolides and lincosamides decrease PLY production or release by MRSP (13, 14, 21, 31). However, the current study indicates that macrolides significantly retarded pneumococcal growth, which was almost certainly related to decreased pneumolysin release within a certain time in the previous studies. We demonstrated that all macrolides used in this study and CLI were found to decrease the hemolytic activity of MRSP, regardless of its inhibitory activity against bacterial growth. Among these, CLR and ERY showed higher inhibitory effects on the hemolytic activity of MRSP, via the transcriptional downregulation of the ply gene. However, the effects of CLR on pneumococcal autolysin were different from those of ERY. ERY treatment impaired LytA release in MRSP and subsequently inhibited autolysis, which is consistent with our previous results (19), whereas CLR upregulated the transcription of the lytA gene and enhanced autolysis. We confirmed these findings in additional independent experiments (data not shown). Although less PLY is produced intracellularly due to reduced transcription of the ply gene with CLR treatment compared to ERY treatment, the increase in lytA gene transcription leading to enhanced autolysis with CLR treatment compared to ERY treatment results in the overall similar supernatant hemolytic activity and PLY concentrations. Overall similarity in vitro was consistent with no difference in effect observed between the macrolides demonstrated in the murine model of MRSP pneumonia. Specifically, the administration of both CLR and ERY significantly decreased the Lm, and the PLY protein level and NE activity in BALF, and improved arterial oxygen saturation, without affecting the bacterial load in the murine model of MRSP pneumonia. These findings suggest that the macrolide-dependent inhibition of PLY reduces pneumococcal virulence.
PLY, a multifunctional pneumococcal virulence factor produced by all clinically relevant pneumococcal isolates (32), shows relatively limited variation between strains (33). PLY plays a role in the initial step of pneumococcal nasal colonization, which may be due to the PLY-induced disruption of the epithelial barrier (34). In vitro studies have demonstrated that PLY exhibits cytotoxicity against various cell types, including nasal and alveolar epithelial cells (15), and neutrophils are highly sensitive to PLY-induced cell lysis (25). Additionally, PLY induces NETosis and activates neutrophil extracellular trap formation (30). Following cell lysis or NETosis, neutrophils release NE, which subsequently induces the disruption of the alveolar epithelial barrier (29). Therefore, in addition to PLY, NE is considered a potential therapeutic target for various respiratory diseases, including pneumococcal pneumonia (35).
The serine protease, NE, plays a crucial role in the host defense against bacterial infections. As for S. pneumoniae, aminopeptidase N, which localizes in the pneumococcal cell wall, serves as a substrate for NE and contributes to the intracellular death of the organism in the neutrophils (36). However, the localized increase in NE activity in the lung has been correlated with acute lung injury via the degradation of cell-cell adhesion molecules (37, 38) and various extracellular matrix proteins (39). A previous study reported that the intratracheal administration of NE induced breakdown of alveoli followed by the elevation of Lm in a rat model (40). The results of this and previous studies indicate that intratracheal pneumococcal infection results in lung injury characterized by an increase in NE activity in BALF (41, 42). Although few studies have assessed the direct effects of PLY on lung injury, García-Suárez et al. reported that the ability of PLY to trigger inflammatory cell activity could play a major role in inducing in vivo lung injury, rather than inducing cytotoxic activity against lung tissue (43). These findings suggest that the PLY-induced leakage of NE from neutrophils is a major etiological factor in lung injury during pneumococcal pneumonia. In our study, since the macrolides did not directly decrease either neutrophil infiltration in vivo or recombinant PLY-induced NE leakage from neutrophils in vitro, we anticipate that the inhibitory effect of macrolides on PLY production mainly contributes to the reduction in the NE activity of BALF and subsequent amelioration of lung injury and arterial oxygen saturation in the murine model of intratracheal MRSP infection.
Macrolides inhibit bacterial growth by impeding the passage of newly synthesized polypeptides through the nascent peptide exit tunnel of the bacterial ribosome. Previously, macrolides were considered to indiscriminately block the elongation of every protein during the early stages of translation. In contrast, a recent study has shown that macrolides differentially inhibit the synthesis of individual proteins. Kannan et al. reported that the most prevalent motif at the ERY-induced translation arrest sites conformed to the consensus [R/K]X[R/K] (44). Therefore, it is possible that, in addition to the downregulation of ply gene transcription, macrolides may also inhibit PLY protein synthesis at an intermediate stage at the KD187K motif. In contrast, in our study, we found that the effects of CLR and ERY on the transcription of the lytA gene were different; CLR upregulated lytA gene transcription in MRSP, whereas ERY showed no effect. The precise regulation of bacterial gene transcription remains poorly understood. Further in vitro studies are needed to evaluate the transcriptional regulation of virulent bacterial genes by macrolides.
Although the main goal of treatment for CAP patients is the elimination of the causative organism, our findings indicate that macrolide monotherapy does not significantly decrease the CFU of MRSP in BALF. To cover a wider spectrum and elicit a synergistic effect, combination antibiotic therapy with different mechanisms of action have sometimes been used for the treatment of pneumonia. In this regard, several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of macrolide and β-lactam combination therapy in mouse models of severe pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae, irrespective of their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns (45, 46). Clinical studies have also indicated that combination therapy leads to considerably reduced mortality among CAP patients (47). Although exposure to β-lactams can cause the lysis of S. pneumoniae cells with increased release of PLY (48), macrolides are considered to compensate for the shortcomings of β-lactams. Additionally, the immunomodulatory effects induced by macrolides may contribute to their clinical efficacy in the treatment of MRSP pneumonia, because macrolides are also effective against noninfectious lung inflammation (49). Therefore, it is difficult to clearly separate the effects of macrolides on host immunity and pneumococcal virulence factors. These findings represent a limitation in the use of animal infection models for evaluating the efficacy of macrolides. Further studies are required to clarify the mechanisms of macrolide action in pneumococcal diseases.
In conclusion, through this study, we have demonstrated that both CLR and ERY reduce the production of PLY in MRSP in vitro. Although the effects of these macrolides on pneumococcal autolysis are different, both macrolides decrease the PLY protein level in the BALF of a mouse model with MRSP pneumonia and ameliorate lung injury. These data reinforce the benefits of macrolides on the clinical outcomes of pneumococcal pneumonia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacteria, mice, and reagents.
A clinical isolate of macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae NU4471 (serotype 19; MIC of penicillin G and ERY were 2 and >1,000 μg/ml, respectively), which harbors macrolide-resistant ermB and mefA genes, was mainly used in this study (13). Additionally, clinical MRSP isolates KM2412 and KM275, which were collected from the nasopharynx of patients with acute otitis media, were used (refer to supplemental material). All pneumococcal strains were grown in tryptic soy (TS) broth (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) under aerobic conditions at 37°C. Male BALB/c mice (10- to 12-week-old mice) were obtained from Nihon CLEA (Tokyo, Japan). The mice were maintained under standard conditions in accordance with the institutional guidelines. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Niigata University (SA00451). CLI, CLR, ERY, and ROX were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan). All antibiotics were dissolved in ethanol and diluted with sterile water for subsequent in vitro experiments. Rabbit anti-pneumococcal LytA antibody was produced by Eurofins Genomics K.K. (Tokyo, Japan), as described previously (19). The expression and purification of His-tagged recombinant PLY was performed as described previously (25).
Effect of macrolides on the growth of MRSP.
First, 100-μl aliquots of S. pneumoniae NU4471, grown until the exponential phase, were inoculated in 10 ml of TS broth. To determine the sensitivity of MRSP to macrolides and lincosamide, various concentrations (10 to 500 μg/ml) of CLI, CLR, and ROX were added to the bacterial cultures and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. Bacterial growth was determined by measuring the optical density (OD) of the cultures at a wavelength of 600 nm using a miniphoto 518R (Taitec, Tokyo, Japan). To determine the inhibitory effect of sub-MICs of macrolides and lincosamide on the growth of MRSP, 0.05% ethanol (control) or 5 μg/ml of ROX, ERY, CLI, and CLR were separately added to the bacterial cultures, and the cultures were incubated at 37°C. Bacterial growth was monitored by continuously measuring the OD of the bacterial culture at a wavelength of 600 nm.
Hemolytic assay.
S. pneumoniae NU4471 cultures were grown in TS broth in the presence of 0.05% ethanol or 5 μg/ml of ROX, ERY, CLI, and CLR until they reached the early stationary phase (OD600, 0.55). Subsequently, the bacterial culture supernatants were collected by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 10 min and filtration using a 0.22-μm pore size syringe filter (GVS Filter Technology, Indianapolis, IN, USA). These bacterial supernatants were used for Western blot and real-time PCR analyses, as described below. Bacterial cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and homogenized with a MagNA Lyser instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) using 0.1-mm silica beads (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA). Subsequently, they were centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 10 min, and the resulting supernatant was used as the pneumococcal cell lysate. The culture supernatant and cell lysates were mixed with a 1% suspension of sheep erythrocytes (Nippon Bio-Test Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan) in PBS and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Subsequently, they were centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 10 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 571 nm using a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A hemolytic unit is defined as the dilution that results in 50% lysis of the erythrocyte suspension (50).
Western blot analysis.
Pneumococcal culture supernatants were collected as described above, mixed with SDS sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE using 12% polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membranes were probed with anti-PLY antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or anti-LytA antibody and incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with ECL Select reagent (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) and analyzed using a chemiluminescence detector (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). The intensity of the signal was quantified using Image Studio software version 5.2 (LI-COR Bioscience, Lincoln, NE, USA).
Quantification of pneumococcal gene transcription and eDNA by real-time PCR.
MRSP strain NU4471 was cultured in TS broth until it reached the exponential growth phase (OD600, 0.2). Subsequently, the culture was incubated in the presence of 0.05% ethanol or 5 μg/ml CLR or ERY for 2 h at 37°C. Bacterial pellets were resuspended in TRI reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA) and homogenized with a MagNA Lyser instrument (Roche Diagnostics) using 0.1-mm silica beads. Bacterial RNA was then isolated using a Direct-zol RNA kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). RNA was reverse transcribed using SuperScript IV VILO master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, quantitative real-time PCR was performed on a StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the cDNA as the template and the Fast SYBR green master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primer sequences for lytA, ply, gapdh, and 16S rRNA (control) were obtained from previous studies (19, 51). The primer sequences for dnaK and tuf are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Target | Sequence (5′–3′) | |
---|---|---|
dnaK | Forward | TGGTGGTGACGACTTTGACC |
dnaK | Reverse | CGCTTTTTCAGCCGCATCTT |
tuf | Forward | CCCAGAACCAGAACGTGACA |
tuf | Reverse | TACCACGGTCGATACGTCCT |
To determine the concentration of eDNA in the collected pneumococcal culture supernatants, we performed absolute quantification using real-time PCR. To prepare a standard curve, pneumococcal DNA was extracted and purified using the GenElute bacterial genomic DNA kit (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA concentration was determined using a NanoDrop Lite spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Subsequently, quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the Fast SYBR green master mix. The primers used in the PCR were designed to target a fragment of the PLY-encoding gene, as described previously (26).
Human NE activity assay.
Heparinized blood was obtained from three healthy donors, and human neutrophils were isolated as previously described (52). Briefly, whole blood was layered onto Polymorphprep (Axis Shield, Dundee, UK) in a 1:1 ratio and centrifuged at 500 × g for 30 min. The layers containing neutrophils were collected, and residual red blood cells were lysed using ACK lysing buffer (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). Subsequently, human neutrophils (2 × 105 cells in 200 μl) were exposed to recombinant PLY (10 μg/ml) in the presence or absence of 5 μg/ml CLR or ERY for 2 h. The culture supernatant was evaluated for NE activity using a human NE activity assay kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The experimental protocol adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Niigata University. Experiments were carried out in accordance with approved guidelines. Informed consent was obtained from all donors prior to their inclusion in the study (permit no. 2018-0075).
Intratracheal infection of MRSP in vivo.
Following the administration of anesthesia (a mixture of medetomidine hydrochloride [Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland], midazolam [Sandoz, Tokyo, Japan], and butorphanol [Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.]), BALB/c mice were intratracheally infected with S. pneumoniae strain NU4471 (5.0 × 108 CFU in 50 μl PBS) using a MicroSprayer aerosolizer (Penn-Century, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA) as described previously (53). CLR or ERY powder was dissolved in 5% gum arabic solution. Pharmacokinetic analysis of CLR in mice has demonstrated that the regimen of 150 mg/kg twice a day is representative of human pharmacokinetics (54). Therefore, CLR (150 mg/kg), ERY (150 mg/kg), or 5% gum arabic solution (control) was administered via oral gavage to the infected mice at 0 and 12 h postinfection. At 24 h postinfection, each mouse was briefly anesthetized with isoflurane using an inhalational anesthetizer system (Natsume Seisakusho, Tokyo, Japan) (55). Subsequently, the arterial oxygen saturation was measured using MouseOx Plus (STARR Life Sciences Corp., Oakmont, PA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions, and the mice were sacrificed immediately. To obtain BALF, 1 ml PBS was introduced into mouse lungs and slowly aspirated (56). BALF samples were plated onto 5% sheep blood agar plates and cultured aerobically to enumerate the recovered CFU. Subsequently, BALF samples were centrifuged at 500 × g, and the cell-free supernatant was used for subsequent NE activity assay, cytokine analysis, and Western blot analysis.
Mouse NE activity in BALF was determined by a method using the NE-specific substrate, N-methoxysuccinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val p-nitroanilide (Merck Millipore), as described previously (53). IL-6 levels in BALF were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Additionally, PLY protein levels in BALF samples were determined by Western blot analysis using anti-PLY antibody (Abcam).
The cell pellet of BALF was analyzed for neutrophil count. Briefly, cells were treated with anti-CD16/32 antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to block nonspecific binding of immunoglobulins to Fc receptors, stained with anti-CD11b-allophycocyanin and Ly-6G-phycoerythrin antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan). Neutrophils were identified by the expression of both Ly-6G and CD11b on a NovoCyte flow cytometer using the NovoExpress software (ACEA Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA).
For histological examination, the lung tissue samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Paraffin-embedded sections were prepared by Biopathology Institute Co., Ltd. (Oita, Japan). These sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Sakura Finetek Japan Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and observed under a BioRevo BZ-9000 microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan).
Calculation of Lm.
To calculate Lm, 5 nonoverlapping regions/mouse were systematically acquired from each section. Briefly, six equally distributed horizontal and six vertical lines (lattice square grid) were laid over the digitized image of a hematoxylin and eosin-stained section. For each line, the intercepts with the tissue structures were counted. Lm is calculated as the ratio between the product of the number of times the traverses are placed on the lung and the length of the traverses, and the sum of all the intercepts (57). Only regions without bronchioles, large blood vessels (>50 μm), and other nonairway sections were selected.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis of the data was performed using one- or two-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test, using Prism Software version 7.05 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (grants JP20K21671, JP19H03828, JP19K22706, JP20K09903, and JP20H03858) and the Takeda Science Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
We have no competing financial interests to declare.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Yutaka Terao, Email: terao@dent.niigata-u.ac.jp.
Joanna B. Goldberg, Emory University School of Medicine
REFERENCES
- 1.Tan TQ. 2012. Pediatric invasive pneumococcal disease in the United States in the era of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:409–419. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00018-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Reynolds CA, Finkelstein JA, Ray GT, Moore MR, Huang SS. 2014. Attributable healthcare utilization and cost of pneumonia due to drug-resistant streptococcus pneumonia: a cost analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 3:16. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-3-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nagai K, Kimura O, Domon H, Maekawa T, Yonezawa D, Terao Y. 2019. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis clinical isolates from children with acute otitis media in Japan from 2014 to 2017. J Infect Chemother 25:229–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Niederman MS. 2015. Macrolide-resistant pneumococcus in community-acquired pneumonia. Is there still a role for macrolide therapy? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 191:1216–1217. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0701ED. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, Anzueto A, Brozek J, Crothers K, Cooley LA, Dean NC, Fine MJ, Flanders SA, Griffin MR, Metersky ML, Musher DM, Restrepo MI, Whitney CG. 2019. Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. An official clinical practice guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 200:e45–e67. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lonks JR, Garau J, Gomez L, Xercavins M, Ochoa de Echagüen A, Gareen IF, Reiss PT, Medeiros AA. 2002. Failure of macrolide antibiotic treatment in patients with bacteremia due to erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin Infect Dis 35:556–564. doi: 10.1086/341978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fogarty C, Goldschmidt R, Bush K. 2000. Bacteremic pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant pneumococci in 3 patients treated unsuccessfully with azithromycin and successfully with levofloxacin. Clin Infect Dis 31:613–615. doi: 10.1086/313976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yanagihara K, Izumikawa K, Higa F, Tateyama M, Tokimatsu I, Hiramatsu K, Fujita J, Kadota J, Kohno S. 2009. Efficacy of azithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, including patients with macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. Intern Med 48:527–535. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kohno S, Tateda K, Kadota J, Fujita J, Niki Y, Watanabe A, Nagashima M. 2014. Contradiction between in vitro and clinical outcome: intravenous followed by oral azithromycin therapy demonstrated clinical efficacy in macrolide-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia. J Infect Chemother 20:199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2013.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cilloniz C, Albert RK, Liapikou A, Gabarrus A, Rangel E, Bello S, Marco F, Mensa J, Torres A. 2015. The effect of macrolide resistance on the presentation and outcome of patients hospitalized for Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 191:1265–1272. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201502-0212OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Restrepo MI, Mortensen EM, Waterer GW, Wunderink RG, Coalson JJ, Anzueto A. 2009. Impact of macrolide therapy on mortality for patients with severe sepsis due to pneumonia. Eur Respir J 33:153–159. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00054108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tamaoki J, Kadota J, Takizawa H. 2004. Clinical implications of the immunomodulatory effects of macrolides. Am J Med 117(Suppl 9A):5S–11S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fukuda Y, Yanagihara K, Higashiyama Y, Miyazaki Y, Hirakata Y, Mukae H, Tomono K, Mizuta Y, Tsukamoto K, Kohno S. 2006. Effects of macrolides on pneumolysin of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Eur Respir J 27:1020–1025. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00116805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Anderson R, Steel HC, Cockeran R, Smith AM, von Gottberg A, de Gouveia L, Brink A, Klugman KP, Mitchell TJ, Feldman C. 2007. Clarithromycin alone and in combination with ceftriaxone inhibits the production of pneumolysin by both macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 59:224–229. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nishimoto AT, Rosch JW, Tuomanen EI. 2020. Pneumolysin: pathogenesis and therapeutic target. Front Microbiol 11:1543. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Berry AM, Yother J, Briles DE, Hansman D, Paton JC. 1989. Reduced virulence of a defined pneumolysin-negative mutant of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun 57:2037–2042. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.7.2037-2042.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Malley R, Henneke P, Morse SC, Cieslewicz MJ, Lipsitch M, Thompson CM, Kurt-Jones E, Paton JC, Wessels MR, Golenbock DT. 2003. Recognition of pneumolysin by Toll-like receptor 4 confers resistance to pneumococcal infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1966–1971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0435928100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Walker JA, Allen RL, Falmagne P, Johnson MK, Boulnois GJ. 1987. Molecular cloning, characterization, and complete nucleotide sequence of the gene for pneumolysin, the sulfhydryl-activated toxin of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun 55:1184–1189. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.5.1184-1189.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Domon H, Maekawa T, Yonezawa D, Nagai K, Oda M, Yanagihara K, Terao Y. 2018. Mechanism of macrolide-induced inhibition of pneumolysin release involves impairment of autolysin release in macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00161-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00161-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Anderson R, Feldman C. 2017. Pneumolysin as a potential therapeutic target in severe pneumococcal disease. J Infect 74:527–544. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Anderson R, Steel HC, Cockeran R, von Gottberg A, de Gouveia L, Klugman KP, Mitchell TJ, Feldman C. 2007. Comparison of the effects of macrolides, amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, doxycycline, tobramycin and fluoroquinolones, on the production of pneumolysin by Streptococcus pneumoniae in vitro. J Antimicrob Chemother 60:1155–1158. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Berry AM, Alexander JE, Mitchell TJ, Andrew PW, Hansman D, Paton JC. 1995. Effect of defined point mutations in the pneumolysin gene on the virulence of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun 63:1969–1974. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.5.1969-1974.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sturgill MG, Rapp RP. 1992. Clarithromycin: review of a new macrolide antibiotic with improved microbiologic spectrum and favorable pharmacokinetic and adverse effect profiles. Ann Pharmacother 26:1099–1108. doi: 10.1177/106002809202600912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Martner A, Skovbjerg S, Paton JC, Wold AE. 2009. Streptococcus pneumoniae autolysis prevents phagocytosis and production of phagocyte-activating cytokines. Infect Immun 77:3826–3837. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00290-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Domon H, Oda M, Maekawa T, Nagai K, Takeda W, Terao Y. 2016. Streptococcus pneumoniae disrupts pulmonary immune defence via elastase release following pneumolysin-dependent neutrophil lysis. Sci Rep 6:38013. doi: 10.1038/srep38013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nagai K, Domon H, Maekawa T, Oda M, Hiyoshi T, Tamura H, Yonezawa D, Arai Y, Yokoji M, Tabeta K, Habuka R, Saitoh A, Yamaguchi M, Kawabata S, Terao Y. 2018. Pneumococcal DNA-binding proteins released through autolysis induce the production of proinflammatory cytokines via toll-like receptor 4. Cell Immunol 325:14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Herta T, Bhattacharyya A, Bollensdorf C, Kabus C, García P, Suttorp N, Hippenstiel S, Zahlten J. 2018. DNA-release by Streptococcus pneumoniae autolysin LytA induced Krueppel-like factor 4 expression in macrophages. Sci Rep 8:5723. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24152-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kovtun A, Messerer DAC, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Huber-Lang M, Ignatius A. 2018. Neutrophils in tissue trauma of the skin, bone, and lung: two sides of the same coin. J Immunol Res 2018:8173983. doi: 10.1155/2018/8173983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Domon H, Terao Y. 2021. The role of neutrophils and neutrophil elastase in pneumococcal pneumonia. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:615959. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.615959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nel JG, Theron AJ, Durandt C, Tintinger GR, Pool R, Mitchell TJ, Feldman C, Anderson R. 2016. Pneumolysin activates neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Clin Exp Immunol 184:358–367. doi: 10.1111/cei.12766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lagrou K, Peetermans WE, Jorissen M, Verhaegen J, Van Damme J, Van Eldere J. 2000. Subinhibitory concentrations of erythromycin reduce pneumococcal adherence to respiratory epithelial cells in vitro. J Antimicrob Chemother 46:717–723. doi: 10.1093/jac/46.5.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cockeran R, Anderson R, Feldman C. 2003. Pneumolysin in the immunopathogenesis and treatment of pneumococcal disease. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 1:231–239. doi: 10.1586/14787210.1.2.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Han C, Zhang M. 2019. Genetic diversity and antigenicity analysis of Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumolysin isolated from children with pneumococcal infection. Int J Infect Dis 86:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hotomi M, Yuasa J, Briles DE, Yamanaka N. 2016. Pneumolysin plays a key role at the initial step of establishing pneumococcal nasal colonization. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 61:375–383. doi: 10.1007/s12223-016-0445-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Polverino E, Rosales-Mayor E, Dale GE, Dembowsky K, Torres A. 2017. The role of neutrophil elastase inhibitors in lung diseases. Chest 152:249–262. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.03.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nganje CN, Haynes SA, Qabar CM, Lent RC, Bou Ghanem EN, Shainheit MG. 2019. PepN is a non-essential, cell wall-localized protein that contributes to neutrophil elastase-mediated killing of Streptococcus pneumoniae. PLoS One 14:e0211632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Boxio R, Wartelle J, Nawrocki-Raby B, Lagrange B, Malleret L, Hirche T, Taggart C, Pacheco Y, Devouassoux G, Bentaher A. 2016. Neutrophil elastase cleaves epithelial cadherin in acutely injured lung epithelium. Respir Res 17:129. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0449-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Carden D, Xiao F, Moak C, Willis BH, Robinson-Jackson S, Alexander S. 1998. Neutrophil elastase promotes lung microvascular injury and proteolysis of endothelial cadherins. Am J Physiol 275:H385–H392. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1998.275.2.H385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Taylor S, Dirir O, Zamanian RT, Rabinovitch M, Thompson AAR. 2018. The role of neutrophils and neutrophil elastase in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Front Med (Lausanne) 5:217. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kuraki T, Ishibashi M, Takayama M, Shiraishi M, Yoshida M. 2002. A novel oral neutrophil elastase inhibitor (ONO-6818) inhibits human neutrophil elastase-induced emphysema in rats. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:496–500. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2103118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Domon H, Nagai K, Maekawa T, Oda M, Yonezawa D, Takeda W, Hiyoshi T, Tamura H, Yamaguchi M, Kawabata S, Terao Y. 2018. Neutrophil elastase subverts the immune response by cleaving toll-like receptors and cytokines in pneumococcal pneumonia. Front Immunol 9:732. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hagio T, Kishikawa K, Kawabata K, Tasaka S, Hashimoto S, Hasegawa N, Ishizaka A. 2008. Inhibition of neutrophil elastase reduces lung injury and bacterial count in hamsters. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 21:884–891. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2008.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.García-Suárez MDM, Flórez N, Astudillo A, Vázquez F, Villaverde R, Fabrizio K, Pirofski L-A, Méndez FJ. 2007. The role of pneumolysin in mediating lung damage in a lethal pneumococcal pneumonia murine model. Respir Res 8:3. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-8-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kannan K, Kanabar P, Schryer D, Florin T, Oh E, Bahroos N, Tenson T, Weissman JS, Mankin AS. 2014. The general mode of translation inhibition by macrolide antibiotics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:15958–15963. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417334111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yoshioka D, Kajiwara C, Ishii Y, Umeki K, Hiramatsu K, Kadota J, Tateda K. 2016. Efficacy of β-lactam-plus-macrolide combination therapy in a mouse model of lethal pneumococcal pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:6146–6154. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01024-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Majhi A, Kundu K, Adhikary R, Banerjee M, Mahanti S, Basu A, Bishayi B. 2014. Combination therapy with ampicillin and azithromycin in an experimental pneumococcal pneumonia is bactericidal and effective in down regulating inflammation in mice. J Inflamm (Lond) 11:5. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-11-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.König R, Cao X, Oswald M, Forstner C, Rohde G, Rupp J, Witzenrath M, Welte T, Kolditz M, Pletz M, CAPNETZ Study Group. 2019. Macrolide combination therapy for patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia? An individualised approach supported by machine learning. Eur Respir J 54:1900824. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00824-2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Brown LA, Mitchell AM, Mitchell TJ. 2017. Streptococcus pneumoniae and lytic antibiotic therapy: are we adding insult to injury during invasive pneumococcal disease and sepsis? J Med Microbiol 66:1253–1256. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Maekawa T, Tamura H, Domon H, Hiyoshi T, Isono T, Yonezawa D, Hayashi N, Takahashi N, Tabeta K, Maeda T, Oda M, Ziogas A, Alexaki VI, Chavakis T, Terao Y, Hajishengallis G. 2020. Erythromycin inhibits neutrophilic inflammation and mucosal disease by upregulating DEL-1. JCI Insight 5:e136706. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.136706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Paton JC, Lock RA, Hansman DJ. 1983. Effect of immunization with pneumolysin on survival time of mice challenged with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun 40:548–552. doi: 10.1128/iai.40.2.548-552.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lo Sapio M, Hilleringmann M, Barocchi MA, Moschioni M. 2012. A novel strategy to over-express and purify homologous proteins from Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Biotechnol 157:279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hiyoshi T, Domon H, Maekawa T, Nagai K, Tamura H, Takahashi N, Yonezawa D, Miyoshi T, Yoshida A, Tabeta K, Terao Y. 2019. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans induces detachment and death of human gingival epithelial cells and fibroblasts via elastase release following leukotoxin-dependent neutrophil lysis. Microbiol Immunol 63:100–110. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Isono T, Domon H, Nagai K, Maekawa T, Tamura H, Hiyoshi T, Yanagihara K, Kunitomo E, Takenaka S, Noiri Y, Terao Y. 2020. Treatment of severe pneumonia by hinokitiol in a murine antimicrobial-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia model. PLoS One 15:e0240329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tessier PR, Kim MK, Zhou W, Xuan D, Li C, Ye M, Nightingale CH, Nicolau DP. 2002. Pharmacodynamic assessment of clarithromycin in a murine model of pneumococcal pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:1425–1434. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.5.1425-1434.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lax S, Wilson MR, Takata M, Thickett DR. 2014. Using a non-invasive assessment of lung injury in a murine model of acute lung injury. BMJ Open Respir Res 1:e000014. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2013-000014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Domon H, Maekawa T, Isono T, Furuta K, Kaito C, Terao Y. 2021. Proteolytic cleavage of HLA class II by human neutrophil elastase in pneumococcal pneumonia. Sci Rep 11:2432. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82212-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Muñoz-Barrutia A, Ceresa M, Artaechevarria X, Montuenga LM, Ortiz-de-Solorzano C. 2012. Quantification of lung damage in an elastase-induced mouse model of emphysema. Int J Biomed Imaging 2012:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2012/734734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.