Skip to main content
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences logoLink to Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences
. 2021 Jul 6;12:e33. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2021.33

Low Level Laser Therapy With an 810-nm Diode Laser Affects the Proliferation and Differentiation of Premature Osteoblasts and Human Gingival Fibroblasts In Vitro

Ioanna Bourouni 1, Kyriaki Kyriakidou 1, Ioannis Fourmousis 1, Ioannis A Vrotsos 1, Ioannis K Karoussis 1,*
PMCID: PMC8558723  PMID: 34733756

Abstract

Introduction: Photomodulation is a promising strategy for optimizing tissue healing, but its photomodulatory effects on the synergistic cellular metabolism of gingival and bony tissues remain largely unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the photomodulatory effects of a diode laser (810 nm) on osteoblasts, HGFs and their co-cultures in vitro.

Methods: Primary cultures of HGFs, cultures of immature osteoblastic cells (MG63) and their co-cultures were irradiated with a diode laser (810 nm), 15 J/cm2. Cell cultures were examined for cellular proliferation (MTT assay), viability (FDA/PI staining) after 24, 48 and 72 hours and cell differentiation (qPCR of collagen type 1a – COL1a and alkaline phosphatase expressions - ALP) after 7 days.

Results: Photomodulation with an 810-nm diode laser increased cell proliferation at all time points. COL1a gene expression increased both in HGF and co-cultures. ALP expression was up-regulated in osteoblastic cultures, but co-cultures with fibroblasts negated this response.

Conclusion: The 810-nm diode laser positively affected cell proliferation and viability in all experimental groups. The statistically significant increased COL1a gene expression at 7 days after irradiation both in the irradiated HGF and co-cultures suggests that low-level laser therapy (LLLT) stimulated extracellular matrix (ECM) formation signaling in both cell types.

Keywords: Co-culture, Diode laser, Human gingival fibroblasts, Osteoblasts, Photomodulation, 810 nm

Introduction

An 810-nm diode laser is surgically used for the safe elimination of soft oral tissue lesions, and is generally employed at the clinical practice facilitating the treatment of extended areas in a single application, and allowing precise control of laser fluence application within the oral cavity.1 There are two types of effects that a low-level laser produces; primary and secondary. Primary effects regard vasodilation, lymphatic drainage, cellular activity and metabolism, enhancement of the blood flow, activation of fibroblasts and neutrophils, and increase of the pain threshold. Overall, the secondary effects are the aggregation of prostaglandin, immunoglobulin and lymphocytes and beta-endorphin, in the nervous tissue, infection and inflammation, and therefore, pain, soreness, and the immune response are reduced.2

At low output power, applied in a non-contact mode, low-level laser therapy (LLLT, 100-500 mW) offers several advantageous results on the target tissue.3 It has been theorized that the radiation of a red or near-infrared spectrum (600-1000 nm) causes stimulation of mitochondria. The keystone for LLLT outcomes is the ability of light to function as a photo-stimulant in living cells by exerting its effects through photoelectric, photo-physical and photochemical phenomena. In this manner, lasers present healing properties such as anti-inflammatory action, analgesia and tissue healing promotion (photobiomodulation).4,5

Despite significant research efforts around the effects of LLLT on various cells or tissues, the appropriate doses of radiation, energy densities, time, and irradiation conditions as well as the appropriate individual settings in the various laser devices, which predictably lead to optimal therapeutic effects, have not been clarified yet. LLLT leads to just a small temperature increase in the treated area, thus avoiding sublimation or thermal lesions.6

It has been supported that the proper time to apply LLLT with a diode laser (600-1000 mm) is in the early stages of healing where the potential of cell proliferation increases. Several in vitro and in vivo studies report the effect of LLLT on various cells, but most of them focus primarily on fibroblasts or osteoblasts alone. Specifically, in gingival fibroblasts, several data report increased cell proliferation, increased mRNA production of the growth factors VEGF and TGF-β and increased mRNA production of COL1a. In osteoblasts, increased cell proliferation, increased expression of growth factors BMP-2 and TGF-β1, increased alkaline phosphate activity and increased mRNA expression of osteocalcin, bone sialoprotein and osteoprotegerin have been reported.7-10

Alkaline phosphatases (ALPs) are expressed by premature osteoblasts and one of their main functions is the promotion of metal deposition by bone marrow cells.11 Increased expression of ALP is applied as a reliable index of osteoblast differentiation.12

Collagen is the most abundant extracellular matrix (ECM) protein in osseous tissues and represents about 90% of the organic phase of the ECM. It is characterized by high elasticity and durability, which provides framing at hard tissues. The COL1a1 gene is expressed primarily by fibroblasts and produces the precursor to the α1 chain of collagen type I, called pre-α1. This chain is combined with not only another pre-α1 chain, but also with a pre-α2 chain (produced by the COL1a2 gene), forming a molecule of pro-collagen type I. This triple helix, processed and cut from enzymes outside the cell, is converted to the mature form of collagen. These mature molecules are then organized into long, thin fibrils that cross-link with another molecule in the space around the cells, resulting in the formation of very strong mature collagen type 1.12

Collectively, published data support that LLLT affects tissues, especially when they are in the healing phase. However, whether LLLT is an effective treatment approach has been challenged to date and has led to controversial conclusions. The reason is that the exact mechanism by which this photochemical phenomenon acts has not been fully understood. The great heterogeneity of the studies in terms of wavelengths, output power, time of application, and technical parameters such as the type and diameter of the optical fiber and the distance between the optical fiber and the target cells, as well as the inability to transfer the in vivo conditions to the laboratory, has led to the diversity of the results of the various studies. Moreover, no study up to now has focused on the outcome of LLLT on conditions resembling the interface between bone and soft tissue like in cases of surgical procedures when a mucoperiosteal flap is elevated.

Therefore, the aim of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of LLLT with a diode laser (810 nm) on the viability, proliferation and differentiation of human premature osteoblasts, human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) and their co-culture.

Materials and Methods

Cell Cultures

MG63 human osteoblast-like cells (LGC standards, Germany) were grown and maintained in a controlled atmosphere (5% CO2, 37°C) in growth medium represented by Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM Gibco Grand Island, NY) low glucose, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) supplemented with 1% antibiotics (penicillin-streptomycin, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) solution. MG63 cells were used between the 3rd and 4th passages seeded at the density of 1 × 104 cells/cm2in 12 multiwell plates.

Cell cultures of primary human gingival fibroblasts, HGFs (LGC standards, Germany), were cultured in the DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 5% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution in standard conditions, 37°C, 5% CO2. HGFs were seeded at the density of 1 × 104 cells/cm2in 12 multiwell plates.

Co-cultures

For the co-cultures of premature osteoblasts and HGFs, in order to provide the necessary nutrients for both cells cultures a mixture of DMEM 10% FBS, low glucose and DMEM/F12 5% FBS supplemented with antibiotics streptomycin/penicillin1% was used in a ratio of 1:1 v/v. The seeding cell density of both cell lines was halved in order to maintain the ratio of 1 × 104 cells/cm2. The cells were seeded in 12-well plates for 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days. All the experiments were performed in triplicate in 3 independent runs.

Laser Irradiation

Twenty-four hours after seeding MG63 cells, HGF and their co-cultures were irradiated by an 810 nm diode laser (FOX, ARC) via a 300 μm optical fiber. The LLLT was applied in concentric circular movements of the optical fiber at a distance of 10 mm from the surface of the culture in order to irradiate the entire well containing the cells. The irradiation settings selected based on prior experiments of our group (data not shown) were as follows: the power output of 500 mW and irradiation duration of 120 seconds (Table 1). As control groups were not irradiated, MG63, HGF and their co-cultures, seeded on tissue culture plastic were used.

Table 1. Specific Diode Laser Settings Applied in the Study.
Parameter Value
Type of laser Diode
Emission mode Continuous wave
Wavelength 810 nm
Delivery system Optical fiber 300 μm
Power 500 mW
Distance from the surface 10 mm
Spot diameter at the well 4.6 mm
Spot area at the well 0.16 cm2
Energy density at the spot area 300 J/cm
Energy density at the well 15 J/cm

MTT Assay

MTT assay (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was used to assess the cell proliferation rate. At each time point, the medium from the experimental groups and controls was removed. 200 μL of MTT (SIGMA M56655) solution and 1.8 mL of DMEM without phenol red were added to each well incubated at 37°C for 4 hours. After discarding the supernatants, the dark blue formazan crystals were dissolved by adding 2 mL of solvent (0.1N HCl in absolute isopropanol) and quantified spectrophotometrically (VersaMax ELISA Microplate Reader, Biocompare, USA) at 570 nm.

Cell Viability

Cell viability was detected applying the double staining FDA/PI (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) method. Briefly, 5 μL of dysoxic fluorescein solution and 2 μL of iodine propidium were added in 10 ml PBS. One milliliter of the solution was added to each well incubated for 3 minutes at room temperature in a dark and humid place. In the fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX60), the living cells appeared green (FDA stain), while the dead cells were observed as red in color (PI stain).

RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

RNA extraction from MG63 cells, HGF and their co-cultures was performed using NucleoZOL (Macherey-Nagel) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Following extraction, the RNA was quantified by using a nanodrop photometer (Shimatzu, Japan). Reverse transcription was performed with 1μg of total RNA and ProtoScript II First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (NEB, US) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was stored at -20°C until further analysis.

qPCR Analysis

In order to quantify gene expression, qPCR was performed using SYBR green chemistry and specific primers for the genes COL1a and ALP (Table 2). The analysis was performed in a Bio-Rad iQ5 real-time PCR cycler (Bio-Rad, USA). The expression was normalized to GAPDH (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) and analysis was performed using the delta-delta Ct (DDCt) method for relative quantification. Amplification curves and melt curves were obtained from each sample in order to calculate the cycle threshold (Ct) and verify specific product formation respectively.

Table 2. Primers Sequences Used in the Experiment.

GAPDH F:CCTGCACCACCAACTGCTTA
R:GGCCATCCACAGTCTTCTGAG
COL1a1 F:TGCTCGTGGAAATGATGGTG
R:CCTCGCTTTCCTTCCTCTCC
VEGF F:CTCCTGTCTTGGGTGCATTG
R:AGCTGCGCTGATAGACAATCC

Statistical Analysis

Following the normality test, a t test was performed for the analysis of differences in the cell number between the experimental groups at each time point. Statistically significant differences were set at P value <0.05.

Results

MTT Assay

The proliferation rate of all the experimental groups statistically significantly increased (P < 0.001). A proliferative peak was observed in the irradiated co-culture experimental group (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparison of Cell Proliferation 24 Hours After Irradiation.

As shown in Figure 2, 48 hours after irradiation, the proliferation of the control groups was in accordance with the characteristics of each cell line. Irradiated HGF showed a higher increase of their population compared to irradiated MG63 and the irradiated co-cultures.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of Cell Proliferation of Irradiated and Non-irradiated Cells at 48 h.

72 hours after irradiation, a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in cell proliferation for all groups was observed. A pronounced increase of cell population in the co-culture experimental groups was noticed (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of Cell Proliferation of Irradiated and Non-irradiated Cultures at 72 h.

Cell Viability

IMO confirmed the results obtained by the MTT test at all the time points (data for 24 hours and 48 hours not shown). However, in addition to the optimal cell viability, a remarkable distribution of the cells in the co-culture wells, where the niches of the small cells were surrounded by elongated cells (arrows), was revealed (Figure 4f).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of Cell Viability of Non-irradiated (a) MG63, (b) HGF, (c) Co-cultures and 810 nm Irradiated, (d) MG63, (e) HGF, and (f) Co-cultures at 72 h.

Gene Expression

The ALP gene expression showed a statistically significant increase, P < 0.005, only in the irradiated MG63 cells (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

ALP Gene Expression of All Irradiated Experimental Groups in 7 Days.

The COL1a gene was overexpressed (P < 0.001) both in the irradiated HGF and irradiated co-cultures (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

COL1a Gene Expression for All Irradiated Experimental Groups in 7 Days.

Discussion

LLLT applications to promote the acceleration of wound healing and reduction of inflammation and pain are well documented.6 At a subcellular level, LLLT increases cellular metabolism, the rate of proliferation, and protein expression of biomarkers and growth factors, thus enhancing the healing process.

In the international literature, there are numerous studies that examine the use of diode lasers for LLLT. However, it is a fact that great heterogeneity exists in relation to methodology, wavelengths, frequency and duration of irradiation among published data, which is a matter of concern for the determination of the optimal parameters that should be applied to improve healing processes.

Our group has examined various wavelengths and energy densities for the optimal settings to be used in cell cultures in order to evaluate their outcome in terms of cell proliferation, differentiation and growth factor expression (Data not presented here). The parameters used in the present study have been verified as offering optimal results of LLLT. To our knowledge, this is the first study that investigated the role of LLLT with a wavelength of 810 nm in the proliferation and differentiation of two different cell populations (HGF, MG63), co-existing in vitro. The selection of this specific co-culture was based on the necessity to resemble a clinical condition arising during flap elevation, where it would be desirable to increase collagen production by gingival fibroblasts, thus promoting the healing of the soft tissue while concomitantly assess the effects of LLLT on a cellular level, as far as the osseous tissue is concerned and at the same time evaluate the effect of LLLT on the concomitantly irradiated bony tissue.

The increased proliferation rate of HGF at 24, 48 and 72 hours found in our study is in accordance with previous research data that concluded on a statistically significant proliferation increase of the same cells at 24 and 48 hours after laser irradiation with similar wavelengths.13,14

Moreover, our results are supported by a systematic review15 based on 13 experimental studies, where it was underlined that further research is anticipated to provide sound evidence on the best settings and application protocols.

In the present study, the proliferation rate of osteoblasts at 24, 48 and 72 hours was found statistically significantly increased in the irradiated groups. The amplification of the proliferation rate of osteoblastic cells after LLLT has been documented by our group in a previous publication.16 The increased proliferation rate of irradiated osteoblasts, found in our study, is in accordance with previous research data on the outcome of LLLT using 810 nm by Soleimani et al who concluded on a statistically significant increase of proliferation.17 Furthermore, our results verify the results of the later study in terms of ALP expression, 7 days after irradiation. Both results of the studies are in accordance with those of an experimental model applying LLLT with an 810-nm diode in murine osteoblasts.18 It should be mentioned that Chang et al18 found 810nm to be superior to other wavelengths evaluated.

However, the lack of ALP expression in the co-cultures in our study is explored for the first time in the literature. A possible explanation is that ALP gene down-regulation in the co-cultures indicates a laser-induced proliferative boost of osteoblastic cells under the interaction with HGF. This speculation is justified by the fact that our mixed population presented a substantial proliferative activity up to 3 days after irradiation (Figure 3). However, there is a chance that a ceiling effect occurred at the 72-hour time point in terms of proliferation; thus, ALP expression may have diminished. This could be due to cytokine signalling of fibroblasts that may have altered the differentiation capacity of osteoblastic cells in the co-culture. Further investigation into the proliferation rates and immunohistochemical characterization of the proportion of the cells in this co-culture for up to 7 days would be interesting.

The most important finding of this study was revealed by the gene expression of the experimental groups in relation to the COL1a gene. This is the first study to evaluate the influence of LLLT with an 810-nm diode on the expression of COL1a by HGFs. Interestingly, a statistically significant increase of this gene expression was revealed in both irradiated HGF and co-cultures, leading to a logical conclusion of the utilization of the examined wavelength with the applied parameters in clinical conditions in a further scientific project. Perhaps the utilization of a single LLLT after the elevation of a mucoperiosteal flap with the suggested parameters would promote post-surgical healing of the operated area.

Conclusion

Photomodulation accelerated the cell proliferation of both cell types examined as well as their co-culture. Gene COL1a overexpression was induced by LLLT with an 810-nm diode.

It could be speculated that during flap surgery, single low-level laser irradiation using 810 nm would promote healing of the soft tissues since collagen production is significantly increased by HGF.

Further studies should be performed to clarify the cellular interactions between HGFs and osteoblasts in order to improve the clinical outcome of LLLT.

Conflict of Interests

The authors certify that they have no commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest or funding in connection with the manuscript.

Please cite this article as follows: Bourouni I, Kyriakidou K, Fourmousis I, Vrotsos IA, Karoussis IK. Low level laser therapy with an 810-nm diode laser affects the proliferation and differentiation of premature osteoblasts and human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. J Lasers Med Sci. 2021;12:e33. doi:10.34172/jlms.2021.33

References

  • 1.Akbulut N, Kursun ES, Tumer MK, Kamburoglu K, Gulsen U. Is the 810-nm diode laser the best choice in oral soft tissue therapy? Eur J Dent. 2013;7(2):207–11. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.110174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Luke AM, Mathew S, Altawash MM, Madan BM. Lasers: A Review with Their Applications in Oral Medicine. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019;10(4):324–9. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ishikawa T, Hagiwara K, Ochiya T. Generation and hepatic differentiation of human iPS cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;826:103–14. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-468-1_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carroll L, Humphreys TR. LASER-tissue interactions. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24(1):2–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2005.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gkogkos AS, Karoussis IK, Prevezanos ID, Marcopoulou KE, Kyriakidou K, Vrotsos IA. Effect of Nd:YAG Low Level Laser Therapy on Human Gingival Fibroblasts. Int J Dent. 2015;2015:25894. doi: 10.1155/2015/258941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huang YY, Chen AC, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy. Dose Response. 2009;7(4):358–83. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.09-027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brignardello-Petersen R, Carrasco-Labra A, Yanine N, Ulloa C, Araya I, Pintor F. et al. Positive association between conflicts of interest and reporting of positive results in randomized clinical trials in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc (1939) 2013;144(10):1165–70. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Almeida-Lopes L, Rigau J, Zângaro RA, Guidugli-Neto J, Jaeger MM. Comparison of the low level laser therapy effects on cultured human gingival fibroblasts proliferation using different irradiance and same fluence. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(2):179–84. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Poon VK, Huang L, Burd A. Biostimulation of dermal fibroblast by sublethal Q-switched Nd:YAG 532 nm laser: collagen remodeling and pigmentation. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2005;81(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2005.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Millán JL. Alkaline Phosphatases: Structure, substrate specificity and functional relatedness to other members of a large superfamily of enzymes. Purinergic Signal. 2006;2(2):335–41. doi: 10.1007/s11302-005-5435-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang L, Buchet R, Azzar G. Distinct structure and activity recoveries reveal differences in metal binding between mammalian and Escherichia coli alkaline phosphatases. Biochem J. 2005;392(Pt 2):407–15. doi: 10.1042/bj20050509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Heinemann DE, Siggelkow H, Ponce LM, Viereck V, Wiese KG, Peters JH. Alkaline phosphatase expression during monocyte differentiation Overlapping markers as a link between monocytic cells, dendritic cells, osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Immunobiology. 2000;202(1):68–81. doi: 10.1016/s0171-2985(00)80054-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kreisler M, Meyer C, Stender E, Daubländer M, Willershausen-Zönnchen B, d’Hoedt B. Effect of diode laser irradiation on the attachment rate of periodontal ligament cells: an in vitro study. J Periodontol. 2001;72(10):1312–7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Azaripour A, Azaripour M, Willershausen I, Noorden C, Willershausen B. Photodynamic Therapy has no Adverse Effects in Vitro on Human Gingival Fibroblasts and Osteoblasts. Clin Lab. 2018;64(7):1225–31. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ren C, McGrath C, Jin L, Zhang C, Yang Y. Effect of diode low-level lasers on fibroblasts derived from human periodontal tissue: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(7):1493–510. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2026-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Karoussis IK, Kyriakidou K, Psarros C, Lang NP, Vrotsos IA. Nd:YAG laser radiation (1064 nm) accelerates differentiation of osteoblasts to osteocytes on smooth and rough titanium surfaces in vitro. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(7):785–90. doi: 10.1111/clr.12882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Soleimani M, Abbasnia E, Fathi M, Sahraei H, Fathi Y, Kaka G. The effects of low-level laser irradiation on differentiation and proliferation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into neurons and osteoblasts--an in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(2):423–30. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0930-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chang B, Qiu H, Zhao H, Yang X, Wang Y, Ji T. et al. The Effects of Photobiomodulation on MC3T3-E1 Cells via 630 nm and 810 nm Light-Emitting Diode. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:8744–52. doi: 10.12659/msm.920396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES