Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
editorial
. 1999 Oct;37(10):3430–3431. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.10.3430-3431.1999

Detection of Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Plasma from Patients with Lymphoproliferative Disease after Allogeneic Bone Marrow or Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

R Beck 1,2, I Westdörp 1,2, G Jahn 1,2, H Schäfer 1,2, L Kanz 1,2, H Einsele 1,2
PMCID: PMC85598  PMID: 10515738

In the April issue, Limaye and colleagues report on detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in sera from solid-organ transplant recipients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) (4). Detection of cell-free EBV DNA appeared to be a sensitive and specific marker for the early detection of PTLD following solid-organ transplantation in this study as well as in another (2). Five of six transplant recipients were shown to have EBV DNA in serum at the time of diagnosis, and in two of three patients for whom stored sera were analyzed EBV DNA was detected 8 and 52 months, respectively, prior to the diagnosis of PTLD.

We analyzed the detection of cell-free EBV DNA in plasma from six patients with histopathologically proven PTLD after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). All patients presented with fever and lymphadenopathy on a median of day 84 (range, day 44 to day 160) after transplantation. Plasma samples obtained during the clinical course of PTLD were available from five patients. Only plasma specimens obtained before the development of PTLD could be analyzed for the sixth patient. By nested PCR with primers derived from the EBNA-1 gene of the virus (1), cell-free EBV DNA was detected in all five patients for whom plasma samples were available during PTLD (Table 1). Furthermore, for four patients detection of cell-free EBV DNA preceded the onset of PTLD by a median of 25 days (range, 7 to 50 days). Thus, detection of EBV DNA in plasma seemed to be predictive of the development of PTLD in these patients (Table 2). This observation might be important as administration of virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes has been described to be effective for treatment of patients with PTLD (3).

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of six patients who developed EBV-associated PTLD after allogeneic BMT or PBSCT

Patient Age (yr) Sex Onset of PTLDa PCR detection of EBV DNA from plasma
During PTLD Before PTLD
1 26 M 66 NDb +
2 40 M 44 + +
3 47 F 62 +
4 34 M 160 + +
5 48 M 55 + +
6 30 M 117 +
a

Number of days after BMT or PBSCT. 

b

ND, not determined (no plasma sample was available from patient 1 during PTLD). 

TABLE 2.

Results of EBV DNA PCR using plasma of patients with PTLD after allogeneic BMT or PBSCT

Patient Onset of clinical PTLD (mo/day/yr) Plasma sample collection date (mo/day/yr) Presence of EBV DNA in plasma
1 4/19/98 3/3/98
3/24/98 +
4/14/98 +
2 6/26/98 6/2/98
6/9/98 +
6/15/98 +
6/22/98 +
6/29/98 +
7/2/98 +
3 5/18/98 5/18/98
5/20/98 +
6/1/98 +
6/2/98 +
6/8/98 +
4 7/7/98 5/6/98
5/19/98 +
5/22/98 +
5/28/98 +
6/2/98 +
6/9/98 +
6/26/98 +
7/1/98
7/6/98 +
7/13/98 +
8/5/98 +
5 6/28/98 5/19/98
6/19/98
6/21/98 +
6/24/98
6/29/98 +
7/6/98 +
6 8/10/98 6/16/98
7/22/98
8/13/98 +

To further analyze the specificity of our assay, we investigated 96 plasma samples from 41 BMT or PBSCT patients with detectable EBV DNA in peripheral blood leukocytes and without clinical signs of PTLD. Eight plasma samples from six patients tested positive for EBV DNA in our assay. Thus, specificity of the plasma PCR with randomly collected plasma samples from BMT or PBSCT patients in this analysis was 91.7% and did not reach the 100% reported by Limaye et al. for 16 control-matched patients after solid-organ transplantation.

Despite the relatively small number of patients with PTLD in our analysis, we suggest that detection of cell-free EBV DNA in patients after BMT or PBSCT is a sensitive and specific marker for ongoing PTLD in the presence of fever and lymphadenopathy. As EBV PCR with cell-free specimens is easy to perform, it might be useful for monitoring of patients at risk of developing PTLD after solid-organ transplantation or BMT or PBSCT. In the absence of clinical symptoms suggestive of PTLD, detection of EBV DNA in plasma may be predictive of later development of lymphoma in some if not all patients after BMT or PBSCT. In summary, we were able to confirm the high sensitivity of detection of EBV DNA in plasma from patients with PTLD after allogeneic BMT or PBSCT as described by Limaye and colleagues for patients after solid-organ transplantation.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cinque P, Brytting M, Vago L, Castagna A, Parravicini C, Zanchetta N, D’Arminio-Monforte A, Wahren B, Lazzarin A, Linde A. Epstein-Barr virus DNA in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with AIDS-related primary lymphoma of the central nervous system. Lancet. 1993;342:398–401. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92814-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fontan J, Bassignot A, Mougin C, Cahn J Y, Lab M. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in serum of transplanted patients: a new diagnostic guide for lymphoproliferative diseases. Leukemia. 1998;12:772. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2400996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Heslop H E, Rooney C M. Adoptive cellular immunotherapy for EBV lymphoproliferative diseases. Immunol Rev. 1997;157:217–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1997.tb00984.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Limaye A P, Huang M-L, Atienza E E, Ferrenberg J M, Corey L. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in sera from transplant recipients with lymphoproliferative disorders. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:1113–1116. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.4.1113-1116.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Oct;37(10):3430–3431.

AUTHOR’S REPLY

Ajit P Limaye 1

My colleagues and I are gratified by the findings reported by Beck et al. Their data extend our observations about the value of detecting free circulating EBV DNA in serum for the early detection of PTLD. Extension of our findings to the marrow or stem cell transplant population is important both clinically and mechanistically, illustrating a possible common pathogenic relationship among different populations.

Overall, the results of the two studies are remarkably similar. EBV DNA was detected in the sera of the majority of patients at the time of diagnosis of PTLD (sensitivity, 83% versus 100%) and was not commonly detected in patients without PTLD (specificity, 100% versus 86%). In addition, EBV DNA was detected prior to the development of PTLD in the majority of patients. The relatively minor differences in sensitivity and specificity between the two studies are likely related to differences in the assays that were used (the more sensitive and slightly less specific nested PCR used by Beck et al. versus the slightly less sensitive but more specific nonnested PCR method used by us).

The combined findings of these two studies confirm the clinical utility of detecting EBV DNA in plasma or serum for the early diagnosis of PTLD and support a potential role for monitoring of patients at risk of developing PTLD. With the advent of newer strategies for the treatment of PTLD, routine monitoring for EBV DNA in serum or plasma may provide a useful marker by which preemptive strategies are implemented. Randomized prospective trials using such an approach are warranted.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES