Skip to main content
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy logoLink to Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
. 2021 Aug 26;76(11):2833–2838. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab279

Investigation of mechanisms responsible for decreased susceptibility of aztreonam/avibactam activity in clinical isolates of Enterobacterales collected in Europe, Asia and Latin America in 2019

Rodrigo E Mendes 1,, Timothy B Doyle 1, Jennifer M Streit 1, Francis F Arhin 2, Helio S Sader 1, Mariana Castanheira 1
PMCID: PMC8561256  PMID: 34436603

Abstract

Background

The combination aztreonam/avibactam is currently under Phase 3 trials for the treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria including those with MBLs.

Objectives

To investigate the resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales exhibiting aztreonam/avibactam MICs of ≥4 mg/L.

Methods

Among 8787 Enterobacterales, 17 (0.2%) isolates exhibited an aztreonam/avibactam MIC of ≥4 mg/L. Isolates were sequenced and screened for β-lactamases. Sequences of porins, penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) and expression levels of AmpC and AcrA were evaluated.

Results

Eleven (11/4154 isolates; 0.26%) Escherichia coli, three (3/1981; 0.15%) Klebsiella pneumoniae and three (3/628; 0.5%) Enterobacter cloacae were identified. All E. coli showed either an ‘YRIK’ or ‘YRIN’ insertion in PBP3. In general, these isolates carried blaCMY and/or blaCTX-M variants, except for one isolate from Korea that also produced NDM-5 and one isolate from Turkey that produced OXA-48. Two DHA-1-producing K. pneumoniae overexpressed acrA and had a premature stop codon in either OmpK35 or OmpK36, whereas a third K. pneumoniae carried blaPER-2 and had a premature stop codon in OmpK35. All three E. cloacae expressed AmpC at levels ≥570-fold, but sequence analysis did not reveal known amino acid alterations associated with decreased avibactam binding or increased hydrolysis of β-lactams. Minor amino acid polymorphisms within OmpC, OmpF and PBP3 were noted among the E. cloacae.

Conclusions

A small number of isolates (0.2%) met the inclusion criteria. E. coli showed altered PBP3 as the most relevant resistance mechanism, whereas K. pneumoniae had multiple resistance mechanisms. Further investigations are needed to clarify resistance in E. cloacae.

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance remains a great concern worldwide, especially among Gram-negative bacteria. The latest report from the US CDC estimated 197 400 cases and 9100 deaths caused by Enterobacterales resistant to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins (ESC), and 13 100 cases and 1100 deaths caused by Enterobacterales resistant to carbapenems (CRE).1 In Europe, 31.7% of Klebsiella pneumoniae were reported as resistant to ESC and 7.5% of K. pneumoniae were reported as resistant to carbapenems in 2018. Resistance rates varied greatly (0%–78%) among the 30 European countries, but most countries (18) reported resistance rates for ESC higher than 20%. Moreover, carbapenem resistance among K. pneumoniae remained below 4% in most countries, but occurrences between 8% and 30% were reported in seven countries, and a rate as high as 64% was reported in Greece.2

The occurrences of resistance phenotypes to ESC and carbapenems are considered serious and urgent threats, respectively.1 These threats prompted the development of new therapeutic options and/or strategies as part of a global action plan against antimicrobial resistance.3 Aztreonam/avibactam, a monobactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combination, is undergoing Phase 3 clinical trials for treating infections caused by Gram-negative organisms including those producing MBLs.4 In contrast to most β-lactams, monobactams are not substrates for MBLs, whereas avibactam reversely inactivates most Class A and C and some D β-lactamase enzymes.5 Thus, this combination mitigates resistance caused by most ESBL, including carbapenemases.6

The in vitro activity of aztreonam/avibactam was assessed against a large collection of contemporary (2019) clinical Enterobacterales recovered from patients hospitalized in medical centres located in Europe, Latin America and the Asia-Pacific region.7 In this previous study, a total of 18 Enterobacterales displayed an aztreonam/avibactam MIC of ≥4 mg/L. These isolates were selected for molecular characterization to investigate the resistance mechanisms associated with this phenotype. This study expands on the previous publication7 to report on the epidemiological typing and resistance mechanisms observed among these select pathogens.

Materials and methods

The original study included 8787 Enterobacterales collected consecutively in 2019 from 64 medical centres in Europe, Russia and Turkey (n =6170); the Asia-Pacific region (n =1456); and Latin America (n =1161). Information related to these organisms can be obtained in Sader et al. (2021).7 Within this collection, 18 (0.2%) isolates exhibited an aztreonam/avibactam MIC of ≥4 mg/L (Table 1): 11 Escherichia coli, 3 K. pneumoniae, 3 Enterobacter cloacae species complex, and 1 Proteus vulgaris. The P. vulgaris was later found to be non-viable and was therefore excluded from further characterization (Table 1). Susceptibility testing was performed by reference broth microdilution according to CLSI.8,9

Table 1.

Isolates exhibiting aztreonam/avibactam MIC results ≥4 mg/L selected for further characterization of resistance mechanisms

Collection number Site code Country City Organism MIC (mg/L)
ATM ATM/AVI ATM/CLA CAZ CAZ/AVI CAZ/CLA COZ/TZB CRO FEP SAM TZP MEM IPM ETP
1108470 68 Turkey Ankara E. coli >64 8 32 >128 2 >128 >16 >8 >256 >64 >128 0.03 0.25 0.12
1108523 68 Turkey Ankara E. coli 32 8 32 >128 2 >128 >16 >8 32 >64 >128 0.03 0.25 0.12
1108694 68 Turkey Ankara E. coli 64 8 64 >128 2 >128 >16 >8 8 64 128 0.06 0.5 0.12
1114251 69 Turkey Istanbul E. coli >64 16 32 >128 8 >128 >16 >8 >256 >64 >128 0.06 1 0.5
1114255 69 Turkey Istanbul E. coli 64 8 64 >128 8 >128 >16 >8 128 >64 >128 1 4 >2
1118669 606 Korea Kangwondo E. coli >64 4 32 >128 >32 >128 >16 >8 >256 >64 >128 32 >8 >2
1116284 603 Thailand Bangkok E. coli >64 8 16 >128 4 16 >16 >8 >32 64 >128 0.03 ≤0.12 0.5
1128667 380 France Rennes Cedex E. coli >64 4 8 >128 1 8 >16 >8 >256 64 64 0.03 ≤0.12 0.25
1130864 86 Italy Rome E. coli >64 8 16 >128 8 16 >16 >8 >256 >64 >128 0.12 0.25 2
1116957 263 Australia Sydney E. coli 16 8 32 >128 2 >128 >16 >8 64 >64 >128 0.03 0.25 0.25
1126350 283 Vietnam Hanoi E. coli >64 16 64 >128 4 >128 >16 >8 >256 >64 >128 0.12 0.25 >2
1122568 40 Argentina Buenos Aires K. pneumoniae >64 8 0.25 >128 16 1 >16 >8 32 >64 >128 1 0.5 >2
1125511 215 Taiwan Taipei K. pneumoniae >64 8 >64 >128 4 >128 >16 >8 8 >64 >128 0.5 1 >2
1116221 603 Thailand Bangkok K. pneumoniae >64 >16 >64 >128 16 >128 >16 >8 16 >64 >128 4 4 >2
1102685 614 Australia Melbourne E. cloacae 64 4 >64 >128 1 >128 >16 >8 32 16 128 0.03 ≤0.12 0.03
1108008 81 Poland Warsaw E. cloacae 64 4 64 >128 4 128 >16 >8 128 >64 >128 2 2 >2
1118254 81 Poland Warsaw E. cloacae >64 16 >64 >128 2 >128 >16 >8 32 >64 >128 0.12 0.5 2

ATM, aztreonam; ATM/AVI, aztreonam/avibactam (at fixed concentration of 4 mg/L); ATM/CLA, aztreonam/clavulanate (at fixed concentration of 4 mg/L); CAZ, ceftazidime; CAZ/AVI, ceftazidime/avibactam; CAZ/CLA, ceftazidime/clavulanate; COZ/TZB, ceftolozane/tazobactam (at fixed concentration of 4 mg/L); CRO, ceftriaxone; FEP, cefepime; SAM, ampicillin/sulbactam; TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam; MEM, meropenem; IMP, imipenem; ETP, ertapenem.

DNA extraction was performed with the ThermoScientific™ KingFisher™ Flex Magnetic Particle Processor (Cleveland, OH, USA) and used as input material for library construction. Libraries were normalized using the bead-based normalization procedure (Illumina) and then sequenced on MiSeq (Reagent Kit v2; 2 × 250 paired reads; 500 cycles). De novo assembled FASTQ files were screened for β-lactamases, as previously described.10 Gene sequences encoding for penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3), OmpC/OmpK36 and OmpF/Ompk35 were investigated. Sequence analysis comparison was performed using sequences from a control isolate belonging to the same MLST as the query sequence. Isolates were subjected to the quantification of AmpC (except for K. pneumoniae) and AcrA (AcrAB-TolC) expression.11

Results

Eleven (11/4154 surveillance isolates; 0.26%) E. coli had elevated aztreonam/avibactam MICs (4–16 mg/L). Ceftazidime/avibactam MICs of 1–8 mg/L were obtained against these isolates, except for one E. coli from Korea that carried blaNDM-5 and blaOXA-181 (MIC, >32 mg/L) (Tables 1 and 2). Elevated MIC results for aztreonam and ESC (≥8 mg/L) were obtained against E. coli, whereas low MIC values were noted for meropenem (0.03–0.12 mg/L) and imipenem (≤0.12–1 mg/L), except against the isolate from Korea that carried blaNDM-5 and blaOXA-181 (imipenem and meropenem MIC, >8 mg/L) and one isolate from Turkey with a blaOXA-48 (imipenem MIC, 4 mg/L) (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 2.

Isolates exhibiting ATM/AVI MIC results ≥4 mg/L selected for further characterization and main resistance mechanisms documented

Collection number Organism MIC (mg/L)
MLST β-lactamase genes mRNA expressiona
Amino acid alterations
ATM/AVI CAZ/AVI AcrA AmpC OmpF/OmpK35 OmpC/OmpK36 PBP3
1108470 E. coli 8 2 410 CMY-42, CTX-M-15, OXA-1 3.6 1.2 WT WT R333insYRIK
1108523 E. coli 8 2 410 CMY-42, OXA-1 3.8 <1 WT L14Q R333insYRIK
1108694 E. coli 8 2 410 CMY-141 2.7 <1 WT G137D R333insYRIK
1114251 E. coli 16 8 410 CMY-42, CTX-M-15, OXA-1, TEM-1 3.5 <1 WT WT R333insYRIK
1114255 E. coli 8 8 410 OXA-48, CMY-42, CTX-M-14, TEM-190 2.3 <1 WT WT R333insYRIK
1118669 E. coli 4 >32 410 NDM-5, OXA-181, CMY-2, CTX-M-15, OXA-1, TEM-1 2.4 <1 WT R199L R333insYRIN
1116284 E. coli 8 4 405 CTX-M-15, OXA-1 <1 <1 N258X WT R333insYRIK
1128667 E. coli 4 1 405 CTX-M-55, OXA-1 <1 <1 N258X WT R333insYRIK
1130864 E. coli 8 8 405 CTX-M-15, OXA-1 <1 <1 N258X WT R333insYRIK
1116957 E. coli 8 2 38 CMY-42, OXA-1 <1 <1 WT WT R333insYRIK
1126350 E. coli 16 4 617 CMY-42, CTX-M-27 4.5 <1 WT WT R333insYRIN
1122568 K. pneumoniae b 8 16 872 PER-2, SHV-11 1.1 NA Y286X WT M6T, A33V, V41I, L370I, Q374K, H396R, E434A, I447M, N455S, L577Q, A578G
1125511 K. pneumoniae b 8 4 15 DHA-1, SHV-28 5.5 NA A119X WT Y432C
1116221 K. pneumoniae b >16 16 273 DHA-1, LAP-2, SHV-11, TEM-1 6.2 NA WT Y43X WT
1102685 E. cloacae 4 1 350 ACT-27 <1 3667 A19S, S159L, Y199F, E200D, Y208L, E224K, G225A, G234E, L235M, Y236H, T243K, N276A, Q276A, F277H, D278_F279insENT P177A G306V
1108008 E. cloacae 4 4 121 ACT-25, CTX-M-15, OXA-1, TEM-1 <1 3060 WT WT WT
1118254 E. cloacae 16 2 78 ACT-24, SHV-12, TEM-1 <1 570 WT P177A, D188E E258_S259insE

ATM/AVI, aztreonam/avibactam; CAZ/AVI, ceftazidime/avibactam.

a

Reported expression results are relative to a control isolate.

b

K. pneumoniae isolates had WT sequences of OmpK37.

These 11 E. coli isolates carried multiple ESBL and plasmid AmpC-encoding genes, mostly consisting of CTX-M and CMY variants (Table 2). Four ST types were observed, with five isolates from two sites in Turkey belonging to ST410. Additionally, the NDM-5-producing E. coli strain from Korea belonged to ST410 (Table 2). All E. coli showed amino acid alterations in the PBP3 sequence either as an ‘YRIK’ or ‘YRIN’ insertion after amino acid 333. Overexpression of either the intrinsic ampC (≤1.2-fold) or acrA (≤4.5-fold) gene was not detected in any E. coli.

Aztreonam/avibactam MICs of 8 mg/L or >16 mg/L and ceftazidime/avibactam MICs of 4 mg/L or 16 mg/L were observed in three K. pneumoniae among a collection of 1981 (0.15%) isolates (Table 1). In general, these isolates had elevated MICs for β-lactams and β-lactam/BLI combinations; however, isolate 1122568 had a lower MIC for aztreonam/clavulanate (0.25 mg/L) and ceftazidime/clavulanate (1 mg/L). These K. pneumoniae remained susceptible to carbapenems (MIC, 0.5–1 mg/L), except for one strain from Bangkok, which displayed an imipenem and meropenem MIC of 4 mg/L (Table 1). All three isolates had elevated MICs for ertapenem.

The K. pneumoniae isolate 1116221 carried DHA-1 and had a premature stop codon at position 43 of OmpK36, whereas WT sequences were observed for OmpK35 and PBP3 (Table 2). This isolate showed expression of acrA 6.2-fold higher than the control strain (Table 2). blaPER-2 and blaDHA-1 were detected in isolates 1122568 and 1125511, respectively, and displayed premature stop codons in OmpK35 as well as amino acid alterations in PBP3 (Table 2). Expression of acrA in isolate 1125511 was 5.5-fold higher than the control strain.

Three (3/628; 0.5%) isolates identified as E. cloacae species complex displayed aztreonam/avibactam MICs of 4–16 mg/L and ceftazidime/avibactam MICs of 1–4 mg/L. These isolates exhibited elevated MICs to other β-lactams and β-lactam/BLI combinations, but remained susceptible to carbapenems, with the exception of isolate 1108008 (MIC, ≥2 mg/L) and isolate 1118254 (ertapenem MIC, 2 mg/L). All three isolates demonstrated a high-level expression of AmpC (≥570-fold). Additionally, isolates 1108008 and 1118254 carried blaCTX-M-15 and blaSHV-12, respectively (Table 2). In general, the E. cloacae complex isolates showed minor amino acid polymorphisms within OmpC and OmpF, except for isolate 1102685, which had multiple alterations within OmpF (Table 2). No amino acid alterations within the AmpC enzyme were noted (Figure S1, available as Supplementary data at JAC Online), but isolates 1102685 and 1118254 showed within PBP3, respectively, a G306V and a glutamic acid insertion at position 259 (Table 2).

Discussion

A total of 11 E. coli isolates were selected for this study; of these isolates, 9 isolates had the ‘YRIK’ insertion and 2 isolates had the ‘YRIN’ insertion after position 333 of PBP3. These insertions were previously described by Alm et al.12 to cause decreased aztreonam binding at the target site and were further evaluated by Sadek et al. (2020).13 Isolates possessing an altered PBP3 and blaNDM would be refractory to aztreonam/avibactam and any clinically available β-lactams and β-lactam/BLI combinations. Recent studies reported a high prevalence of NDM-producing E. coli with PBP3 insertions, which seem to be more prevalent in India.13,14 However, other surveillance studies reported a low proportion (≤0.3%) of Enterobacterales with aztreonam/avibactam MICs of ≥4 mg/L; these isolates tended to be carbapenem susceptible.15 A narrow aztreonam/avibactam MIC range (4–16 mg/L) was obtained against E. coli as well as for ceftazidime/avibactam (1–8 mg/L), except against the NDM-5-producing E. coli (>32 mg/L). These results indicate that the PBP3 mutations are essentially driving the higher aztreonam/avibactam MICs and the MIC variation (4–16 mg/L) may be caused by the β-lactamase background, as demonstrated previously.13

The three K. pneumoniae had aztreonam/avibactam MICs of ≥8 mg/L and ceftazidime/avibactam MICs of 4–16 mg/L. The aztreonam/ and ceftazidime/clavulanate MICs (0.25–1 mg/L) were 16- to 32-fold lower than when these drugs were combined with avibactam against a PER-2 producer (1122568). Avibactam seems to inhibit PER-2 to a lesser extent than other ESBLs, which can partially explain the elevated MICs.16 Notably, clavulanate did not bring the aztreonam (0.25 mg/L) and ceftazidime (1 mg/L) MICs down to WT levels (modal MIC, 0.03 mg/L and 0.12 mg/L, respectively; data not shown). The absence of OmpK35 or OmpK36 does not significantly affect susceptibility to ceftazidime.17 However, the absence of both porins or absence of any porin and the presence of an ESBL increases the ceftazidime MIC around 4-fold, which seems to fit the results observed for 1122568.17

The remaining K. pneumoniae isolates 1116221 and 1125511 produced DHA-1. The former isolate had a premature stop codon within OmpK36, whereas the latter isolate had a premature stop codon within OmpK35. Both isolates expressed moderate levels of AcrAB-TolC. Nicolas-Chanoine et al.18 demonstrated that a DHA-1-producing K. pneumoniae strain exhibited a ceftazidime/avibactam MIC of 2 mg/L, and isogenic strains expressing DHA-1 and additional resistance mechanisms associated with drug influx or efflux had MICs of 4–16 mg/L. These results are consistent with those obtained here (MIC, 4–16 mg/L) and suggest that the aztreonam/avibactam and ceftazidime/avibactam MICs obtained against isolates 1116221 and 1125511 were likely due to the production of DHA-1 in combination with drug efflux and porin deficiencies.5

One possible hypothesis for the elevated aztreonam/avibactam MICs in isolates 1102685 and 1108008 (MIC, 4 mg/L) would be the similar elevated expression of AmpC. It is tempting to speculate that the amount of enzyme produced could overcome the in vitro inhibitory capability of avibactam used at 4 mg/L. However, while isolate 1108008 had a WT PBP3 sequence, isolate 1102685 showed a G306V mutation. This glycine is located within the η3 loop region. Although it is considered a conserved amino acid, it is situated at the opposite side of the active β-lactam binding site and may not affect enzyme–substrate affinities, unless G306V causes conformational changes in the PBP3 structure that affect the active site. E. cloacae 1118254 had a higher aztreonam/avibactam MIC (16 mg/L), but a much lower expression of AmpC compared with isolates 1102685 and 1108008. However, isolate 1118254 had a glutamic acid insertion in the transpeptidase domain (amino acid 237–577) of PBP3. This insertion was previously reported in an E. cloacae that displayed an aztreonam/avibactam MIC of >8 mg/L, 19 and it is located adjacent to the conserved alanine at position 257 at the end of the α8 loop, which adjoins the active binding site.20

This study further analysed 17 (17/8787; 0.2%) Enterobacterales isolates that showed a decreased susceptibility to aztreonam/avibactam to discern their associated resistance mechanisms. In summary, E. coli tended to be carbapenem susceptible and produce an altered PBP3, likely as a relevant aztreonam/avibactam resistance mechanism acting in conjunction with the β-lactamase background.13 The K. pneumoniae showed multiple mechanisms, whereas the E. cloacae did not show clear evidence to explain their elevated MICs, other than an overexpression of AmpC.

Supplementary Material

dkab279_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all participants of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program for providing bacterial isolates. We would also like to thank Amy Chen, Judy Oberholser and Sean DeVries for editorial assistance.

Funding

This study at JMI Laboratories was supported by Pfizer Inc. (New York, NY, USA). Pfizer was involved in the decision to present these results.

Transparency declarations

M.C., T.B.D., J.M.S., H.S.S. and R.E.M. are employees of JMI Laboratories, which was a paid consultant to Pfizer in connection with the development of this study and manuscript. F.F.A. is an employee of Pfizer, Inc.

JMI Laboratories contracted to perform services in 2020 for Affinity Biosensors, Allergan, Amicrobe, Inc., Amplyx Pharma, Artugen Therapeutics USA, Inc., Astellas, Basilea, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, BIDMC, bioMerieux, Inc., BioVersys Ag, Bugworks, Cidara, Cipla, Contrafect, Cormedix, Crestone, Inc., Curza, CXC7, Entasis, Fedora Pharmaceutical, Fimbrion Therapeutics, Fox Chase, GlaxoSmithKline, Guardian Therapeutics, Hardy Diagnostics, IHMA, Janssen Research & Development, Johnson & Johnson, Kaleido Biosciences, KBP Biosciences, Luminex, Matrivax, Mayo Clinic, Medpace, Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd, Melinta, Menarini, Merck, Meridian Bioscience Inc., Micromyx, MicuRx, N8 Medical, Nabriva, National Institutes of Health, National University of Singapore, North Bristol NHS Trust, Novome Biotechnologies, Paratek, Pfizer, Prokaryotics Inc., QPEX Biopharma, Rhode Island Hospital, RIHML, Roche, Roivant, Salvat, Scynexis, SeLux Diagnostics, Shionogi, Specific Diagnostics, Spero, SuperTrans Medical LT, T2 Biosystems, The University of Queensland, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tufts Medical Center, Universite de Sherbrooke, University of Iowa, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Wisconsin, UNT System College of Pharmacy, URMC, UT Southwestern, VenatoRx, Viosera Therapeutics and Wayne State University. There are no speakers’ bureaus or stock options to declare.

Supplementary data

Figure S1 is available as Supplementary data at JAC Online.

References

  • 1.CDC. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf.
  • 2.ECDC. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe (EARS-Net) 2018. 2019. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/surveillance-antimicrobial-resistance-Europe-2018.pdf.
  • 3.WHO. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. http://www.wpro.who.int/entity/drug_resistance/resources/global_action_plan_eng.pdf.
  • 4.Cornely OA, Cisneros JM, Torre-Cisneros J. et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of aztreonam/avibactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: results from the REJUVENATE study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75: 618–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ehmann DE, Jahic H, Ross PL. et al. Kinetics of avibactam inhibition against Class A, C, and D β-lactamases. J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 27960–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marshall S, Hujer AM, Rojas LJ. et al. Can ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam overcome β-lactam resistance conferred by metallo-β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61: e02243-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sader HS, Carvalhaes CG, Arends SJR. et al. Aztreonam/avibactam activity against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales collected in Europe, Asia and Latin America in 2019. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76: 659–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.CLSI. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically—Eleventh Edition: M07. 2018.
  • 9.CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—Thirtieth Edition: M100. 2020.
  • 10.Mendes RE, Jones RN, Woosley LN. et al. Application of next-generation sequencing for characterization of surveillance and clinical trial isolates: analysis of the distribution of β-lactamase resistance genes and lineage background in the United States. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019; 6: S69–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Castanheira M, Costello SE, Woosley LN. et al. Evaluation of clonality and carbapenem resistance mechanisms among Acinetobacter baumannii-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus complex and Enterobacteriaceae isolates collected in European and Mediterranean countries and detection of two novel β-lactamases, GES-22 and VIM-35. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58: 7358–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alm RA, Johnstone MR, Lahiri SD.. Characterization of Escherichia coli NDM isolates with decreased susceptibility to aztreonam/avibactam: role of a novel insertion in PBP3. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015; 70: 1420–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sadek M, Juhas M, Poirel L. et al. Genetic features leading to reduced susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam among metallo-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64: e01659-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Periasamy H, Joshi P, Palwe S. et al. High prevalence of Escherichia coli clinical isolates in India harbouring four amino acid inserts in PBP3 adversely impacting activity of aztreonam/avibactam. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75: 1650–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Karlowsky JA, Kazmierczak KM, de Jonge BLM. et al. In vitro activity of aztreonam-avibactam against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated by clinical laboratories in 40 countries from 2012 to 2015. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61: e00472-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ruggiero M, Papp-Wallace KM, Taracila MA. et al. Exploring the landscape of diazabicyclooctane (DBO) inhibition: avibactam inactivation of PER-2 β-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61: e02476-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tsai YK, Fung CP, Lin JC. et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae outer membrane porins OmpK35 and OmpK36 play roles in both antimicrobial resistance and virulence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 1485–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nicolas-Chanoine MH, Mayer N, Guyot K. et al. Interplay between membrane permeability and enzymatic barrier leads to antibiotic-dependent resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front Microbiol 2018; 9: 1422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mushtaq S, Vickers A, Doumith M. et al. Activity of β-lactam/taniborbactam (VNRX-5133) combinations against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76: 160–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sun S, Selmer M, Andersson DI.. Resistance to β-lactam antibiotics conferred by point mutations in penicillin-binding proteins PBP3, PBP4 and PBP6 in Salmonella enterica. PLoS One 2014; 9: e97202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

dkab279_Supplementary_Data

Articles from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES