Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2021 Nov 1;176(1):94–96. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.4334

Screen Time Use Among US Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Findings From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study

Jason M Nagata 1,, Catherine A Cortez 2, Chloe J Cattle 1, Kyle T Ganson 3, Puja Iyer 1, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo 4, Fiona C Baker 5
PMCID: PMC8561427  PMID: 34724543

Abstract

This cross-sectional study reviews findings from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study on digital media use by US youths during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Excessive screen use in adolescents has been associated with physical and mental health risks,1 and there are known disparities in screen use across sex, race and ethnicity, and income in adolescents.2 The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent stay-at-home mandates, online learning, and social distancing requirements have led to an increasing reliance on digital media (ie, screens) for nearly all facets of adolescents’ lives (eg, entertainment, socialization, education). Although studies conducted worldwide have suggested an increase in screen time among children and teens during the pandemic,3,4 this has not yet been explored using national US data. The aims of this study were to evaluate adolescents’ self-reported screen use during the pandemic across 7 modalities by sociodemographic categories and to assess mental health and resiliency factors associated with screen use among a demographically diverse, national sample of children and adolescents aged 10 to 14 years.

Methods

Cross-sectional data from the May 2020 COVID-19 survey (COVID-19 Rapid Response Research Release) from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study were analyzed. The sample consisted of 5412 adolescents predominantly aged 12 to 13 years. Centralized institutional review board approval was obtained from the University of California, San Diego. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline. Written informed consent and assent were obtained from a parent or guardian and the child, respectively, to participate in the ABCD study.

Screen use for the following modalities was determined using adolescents’ self-reported hours of use on a typical day, excluding hours spent on school-related work: multiple-player gaming, single-player gaming, texting, social media, video chatting, browsing the internet, and watching or streaming movies, videos, or television shows.5 Total typical daily screen use, excluding schoolwork, was calculated as the sum. Multiple linear regression analyses estimated associations between mental health and resiliency factors (eMethods in the Supplement provides the measures) and total screen use, after adjustment for potential confounders including sex, race and ethnicity (as self-reported from a list of categories), annual household income, parent educational level, and study site. Analyses were conducted in 2021 using Stata 15.1, weighting data to approximate the American Community Survey by the US Census. Testing was 2-sided, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Among the 5412 adolescents included in our sample, 50.7% were female and 49.3% were male. The sample was racially and ethnically diverse (7.2% Asian; 11.1% Black; 17.2% Hispanic, Latina, and Latino; 2.5% Native American; 60.6% White; and 1.4% self-reported as other). Adolescents reported a mean (SD) of 7.70 (5.74) h/d of screen use, mostly spent on watching or streaming videos, movies, or television shows (2.42 [2.45] h/d), multiple-player gaming (1.44 [2.21] h/d), and single-player gaming (1.17 [1.82] h/d). The mean and SD screen use time for each modality by sociodemographic characteristics are given in Table 1. In adjusted models (Table 2), poorer mental health (B, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.06-0.52; P = .01) and greater perceived stress (B, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43-0.91; P < .001) were associated with higher total screen use, while more social support (B, −0.32; 95% CI, −0.59 to −0.04; P = .02) and coping behaviors (B, −0.17; 95% CI, −0.26 to −0.09; P < .001) were associated with lower total screen use.

Table 1. Summary of Adolescent-Reported Screen Time Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Sociodemographic Characteristics Among 5412 Participants in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, May 2020a.

Sociodemographic characteristic Screen time, mean (SD), h/db
Total screen time Streaming Multiple-player gaming Single-player gaming Social media Texting Video chatting Browsing the internet
Total 7.70 (5.74) 2.42 (2.45) 1.44 (2.21) 1.17 (1.82) 0.98 (1.66) 0.84 (1.51) 0.65 (1.18) 0.42 (0.67)
Sex
Female 7.23 (5.52) 2.44 (2.37) 0.69 (1.38) 0.70 (1.24) 1.30 (1.86) 1.05 (1.70) 0.85 (1.32) 0.40 (0.64)
Male 8.18 (5.92) 2.41 (2.53) 2.22 (2.60) 1.66 (2.16) 0.65 (1.34) 0.63 (1.24) 0.44 (0.97) 0.44 (0.71)
Race and ethnicity
Asian 6.60 (5.60) 2.07 (2.45) 1.31 (2.11) 0.84 (1.55) 0.69 (1.32) 0.72 (1.23) 0.64 (1.26) 0.40 (0.63)
Black 10.06 (7.21) 2.82 (2.89) 1.75 (2.71) 1.68 (2.41) 1.40 (2.14) 1.36 (2.33) 0.95 (1.71) 0.58 (0.95)
Hispanic, Latina, and Latino 8.73 (5.64) 2.65 (2.44) 1.73 (2.20) 1.44 (1.87) 1.05 (1.59) 1.05 (1.62) 0.70 (1.26) 0.45 (0.67)
Native American 9.67 (7.31) 2.87 (2.76) 1.65 (2.49) 1.59 (2.26) 1.42 (2.32) 1.38 (2.56) 0.82 (1.69) 0.55 (0.86)
White 6.98 (5.22) 2.30 (2.32) 1.31 (2.11) 1.02 (1.66) 0.88 (1.56) 0.69 (1.23) 0.56 (0.97) 0.38 (0.61)
Otherc 9.65 (5.11) 2.82 (2.67) 1.66 (1.75) 1.58 (1.70) 1.69 (2.02) 0.65 (0.83) 1.08 (1.49) 0.29 (0.38)
Highest parent educational level
College education or more 7.47 (5.68) 2.39 (2.44) 1.39 (2.19) 1.10 (1.76) 0.94 (1.66) 0.81 (1.49) 0.65 (1.18) 0.40 (0.66)
High school education or less 9.23 (5.75) 2.64 (2.43) 1.83 (2.27) 1.69 (2.05) 1.20 (1.63) 1.11 (1.55) 0.65 (1.18) 0.53 (0.73)
Annual household income, $
≥75 000 7.01 (5.85) 2.28 (2.59) 1.30 (2.26) 0.97 (1.77) 0.88 (1.72) 0.71 (1.39) 0.63 (1.19) 0.37 (0.67)
<75 000 8.48 (5.26) 2.58 (2.20) 1.61 (2.04) 1.40 (1.73) 1.08 (1.52) 1.00 (1.49) 0.66 (1.11) 0.47 (0.64)
a

Propensity weights from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study were applied based on the American Community Survey from the US Census.

b

Individual screen time estimates do not equal the sum total because a winsorization method was applied to minimize the impact of extreme values within the distributions of each screen time category and the total category.

c

This subcategory was listed as “other” but with no specific racial and ethnic groups defined, although write-ins were allowed.

Table 2. Mental Health and Resiliency Factors Associated With Total Screen Time Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among 5412 Participants in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, May 2020a.

Factor Unadjusted Adjusted
Difference in total screen time, B (95% CI), h/d P value Difference in total screen time, B (95% CI), h/d P value
Mental health 0.02 (−0.22 to 0.25) .89 0.29 (0.06 to 0.52) .01
COVID-19–related worry 0.15 (−0.05 to 0.35) .13 0.01 (−0.19 to 0.20) .94
Perceived stress 0.66 (0.41 to 0.91) <.001 0.67 (0.43 to 0.91) <.001
Social support −0.12 (−0.40 to 0.16) .42 −0.32 (−0.59 to −0.04) .02
Coping behaviors −0.32 (−0.40 to −0.24) <.001 −0.17 (−0.26 to −0.09) <.001
a

Estimated differences in total screen time were obtained as the regression coefficient (B) (95% CI) from a series of linear regression models, with total screen time as the dependent variable and each mental health and resiliency factor (eg, mental health, COVID-19–related worry) as the independent variable of interest. The contrast for these variables is a 1-point difference in their corresponding scale; see the eMethods in the Supplement for further details on the coding of these scales. The table represents the abbreviated outputs from 10 regression models in total. Adjusted models represent the abbreviated output from linear regression models including covariate adjustment for sex, race and ethnicity, annual household income, parent educational level, and site. Propensity weights from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study were applied based on the American Community Survey from the US Census.

Discussion

In this cross-sectional study of a large, national sample of adolescents surveyed early in the COVID-19 pandemic, we found that the mean total daily screen use was 7.70 h/d. This is higher than prepandemic estimates (3.8 h/d) from the same cohort at baseline, although younger age and slightly different screen time categories could also account for differences.6 Despite the gradual reversal of quarantine restrictions, studies have suggested that screen use may remain persistently elevated.4 Screen time disparities across racial, ethnic, and income groups in adolescents have been reported previously and may be due to structural and systemic racism–driven factors (eg, built environment, access to financial resources, and digital media education)—all of which have been amplified in the COVID-19 pandemic.2 Different screen use modalities may have differential positive or negative consequences for adolescents’ well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adolescents experiencing stress and poor mental health may use screens to manage negative feelings or withdraw from stressors. Although some screen modalities may be used to promote social connection, higher coping behaviors and social support in this sample were associated with lower total screen usage. Limitations of this study include the use of self-reported data. Furthermore, adolescents often multitask on screens; thus, the computed total could be an overestimate. Future studies should examine screen use trends as pandemic restrictions are lifted and also explore mechanisms to prevent sociodemographic disparities.

Supplement.

eMethods. Supplemental Methods.

eReferences

References

  • 1.Stiglic N, Viner RM. Effects of screentime on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: a systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e023191. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anderson SE, Economos CD, Must A. Active play and screen time in US children aged 4 to 11 years in relation to sociodemographic and weight status characteristics: a nationally representative cross-sectional analysis. BMC Public Health. 2008;8(1):366. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guo YF, Liao MQ, Cai WL, et al. Physical activity, screen exposure and sleep among students during the pandemic of COVID-19. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8529. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88071-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Werling AM, Walitza S, Drechsler R. Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on screen media use in patients referred for ADHD to child and adolescent psychiatry: an introduction to problematic use of the internet in ADHD and results of a survey. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2021;128(7):1033-1043. doi: 10.1007/s00702-021-02332-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bagot KS, Matthews SA, Mason M, et al. Current, future and potential use of mobile and wearable technologies and social media data in the ABCD study to increase understanding of contributors to child health. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018;32:121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nagata JM, Iyer P, Chu J, et al. Contemporary screen time modalities among children 9-10 years old and binge-eating disorder at one-year follow-up: a prospective cohort study. Int J Eat Disord. 2021;54(5):887-892. doi: 10.1002/eat.23489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement.

eMethods. Supplemental Methods.

eReferences


Articles from JAMA Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES