Skip to main content
mSystems logoLink to mSystems
. 2021 Apr 20;6(2):e00608-20. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00608-20

Host Immunity Alters Community Ecology and Stability of the Microbiome in a Caenorhabditis elegans Model

Megan Taylor a, N M Vega a,
Editor: John F Rawlsb
Reviewed by: Julia Johnkec
PMCID: PMC8561663  PMID: 33879498

ABSTRACT

A growing body of data suggests that the microbiome of a species can vary considerably from individual to individual, but the reasons for this variation—and the consequences for the ecology of these communities—remain only partially explained. In mammals, the emerging picture is that the metabolic state and immune system status of the host affect the composition of the microbiome, but quantitative ecological microbiome studies are challenging to perform in higher organisms. Here, we show that these phenomena can be quantitatively analyzed in the tractable nematode host Caenorhabditis elegans. Mutants in innate immunity, in particular the DAF-2/insulin growth factor (IGF) pathway, are shown to contain a microbiome that differs from that of wild-type nematodes. We analyzed the underlying basis of these differences from the perspective of community ecology by comparing experimental observations to the predictions of a neutral sampling model and concluded that fundamental differences in microbiome ecology underlie the observed differences in microbiome composition. We tested this hypothesis by introducing a minor perturbation into the colonization conditions, allowing us to assess stability of communities in different host strains. Our results show that altering host immunity changes the importance of interspecies interactions within the microbiome, resulting in differences in community composition and stability that emerge from these differences in host-microbe ecology.

IMPORTANCE Here, we used a Caenorhabditis elegans microbiome model to demonstrate how genetic differences in innate immunity alter microbiome composition, diversity, and stability by changing the ecological processes that shape these communities. These results provide insight into the role of host genetics in controlling the ecology of the host-associated microbiota, resulting in differences in community composition, successional trajectories, and response to perturbation.

KEYWORDS: Caenorhabditis elegans, immunocompromised hosts, microbial communities, microbial ecology

INTRODUCTION

Host-associated microbiomes are increasingly recognized as ecological systems, where interactions among microbes and between microbes and their host are important for shaping community composition, structure, and function (1, 2). As this understanding has developed, a search for the ecological principles that define these communities has ensued (3, 4).

There is particular interest in understanding the sources and consequences of variation in host-associated microbiotas. Host-associated microbiomes associated with any given body site can vary considerably between individuals and within individuals over time (5, 6). Some of this variation is attributable to the stochastic processes of colonization and drift experienced by any open ecological system (711). However, there is a gathering consensus that host-associated microbial communities are shaped by deterministic processes, including filtering (selection of colonists by the host) and competitive and cooperative interactions among microbes (10, 12, 13).

Some of this variation can be traced to genetic differences between hosts (1416). However, the effect of host genetic variation on the ecology of microbiome communities remains poorly understood. Much of the existing data focus on interactions between individual commensal bacteria and their specific hosts, although there is increasing interest in understanding the mechanisms by which a host can control the composition of its microbiome (1719). If host genetics affect the ecological processes of community assembly, differences between hosts can result in differences in microbiome succession, composition, and stability properties due to differences in the underlying ecology of these communities. Understanding how the host environment shapes the ecological dynamics of microbiome communities will be important for determining how communities in different hosts might respond differently to normal perturbations (e.g., changes in nutrient availability, exposure to innocuous microbes, and host circadian rhythms) and pathological events (e.g., pathogen invasion, drug or toxin exposure, and host disease or trauma).

Here, we present experimental evidence that differences in host genetics can alter the ecological dynamics of microbiome communities, resulting in differences in assembly, succession, and response to perturbation. Using a minimal native microbiome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, we colonized N2 wild-type hosts and well-characterized mutant strains under highly controlled conditions to determine the effects of host genetics on the structure and dynamics of intestinal communities.

RESULTS

Effects of host genetics on microbiome assembly.

In these experiments, germfree, reproductively sterile adult C. elegans organisms from N2 (wild type) and selected mutant strains (Table 1) were colonized from an artificially constructed metacommunity of eight bacterial strains. These bacterial strains represent a taxonomically and functionally diverse subset of isolates from a wild C. elegans microbiome (20, 21) (see Materials and Methods). Each possessed a unique colony morphology when cocultured on agar plates, allowing CFU counts for each species to be taken from mixed communities (Fig. S1).

TABLE 1.

C. elegans lineages used in this studya

graphic file with name msystems.00608-20-t001.jpg

a

Pharyngeal mutants are highlighted in blue, innate immune mutants are highlighted in yellow, and control strains are highlighted in gray.

FIG S1

Colony morphologies of the MYb bacterial isolates used in this study. All plating and CFU counting used salt-free modified nutrient agar (NA) to maximize differences between colony phenotypes. Bottom panels show plates resulting from mechanical disruption of two individual N2 worms, after 4 days of colonization with the standard eight-species metacommunity (see Materials and Methods). MYb56 shows two distinct morphologies on plates, as seen in the bottom panel. Colony counts of MYb56 were typically obtained by counting the number of branching centers on plates after 48 h of growth, to better distinguish the origins of individual colonies. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 0.8 MB (848.4KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Communities in the N2 intestine showed distinct ecological patterns despite high variability (Fig. 1A; Data Set S1; Table 1). While total colonization ranged across nearly two orders of magnitude, from 1,680 to 67,200 CFU/worm, community composition did not change dramatically across this range (Fig. S2). Overall, these communities showed high frequencies of MYb71 (Ochrobactrum) (Fig. 1B), consistent with prior observations that this genus tends to dominate communities in lab-colonized worms (20). Community composition differed in worms sampled at different time points in colonization (Fig. 1C), and day 4 of colonization appears to represent midsuccession in these experiments. We therefore opted to measure communities after 4 days, which we hypothesized would provide useful data on differences in ecological dynamics across host strains, albeit while failing to maximize compositional differences between lineages.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Eight-species microbial communities in the N2 intestine show distinct trends and variation. N2 worms were sampled from 12 independent experiments conducted over the course of ∼1 year. Each individual experiment contains data for 12 to 36 individual N2 worms taken from a single well. (A) CFU-per-worm data for the full data set of individual hosts (n = 164) after 4 days of colonization with this eight-species bacterial consortium. Each color represents a single host, and data are grouped by bacterial species to illustrate trends in abundance. (B) Average relative abundance of each bacterial species across all individual N2 worms. (C) Principal-component analysis (PCA) of community composition over time in N2 worms across a 6-day time series of colonization (24 individual worms/day, destructive sampling of individual hosts).

DATA SET S1

Community composition data sets. Download Data Set S1, XLSX file, 0.1 MB (108.5KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Total colonization intensity in N2 worms colonized with an eight-species bacterial consortium (n = 164 individual worms). (A) Individual worms in this plot are ordered by total intestinal population size (from low to high, 1,680 to 67,200 CFU/worm). (B) Running average of relative abundance data, calculated using a 10-worm moving window (average over all consecutive sets of 10 worms in the ordered data set in panel A). Note that relative frequency of MYb71 was somewhat higher, and frequencies of MYb45, -53, and -56 somewhat lower, in very heavily colonized worms than in lightly colonized worms, indicating a possible diversity-population size relationship in these communities (see Fig. 3 and Fig. S4). (C) Histogram of total CFU per worm in the N2 worm set. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.2 MB (224.8KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Next, we explored the effects of host mutations on the composition of the microbiome (Fig. 2; Data Set S1; Table 1; Fig. S3). All worm mutants were colonized under the same conditions used for N2 (above), and preliminary testing indicated differences between host strains (analysis of similarity [ANOSIM] based on Bray-Curtis differences, 9,999 permutations, R = 0.27, P < 0.0001; permutational multivariate analysis of variance [PERMANOVA], 999 permutations, F = 54.624, P = 0.001). First, we analyzed grinder-defective mutants (eat and also phm-2 mutants), which have known alterations in their interactions with bacteria (22, 23). Bacterial communities in the mild grinder mutant eat-14 were very similar to those in N2. While communities in the severe grinder phm-2 mutant were large compared to those in N2 (median CFU/worm, 36,190 versus 13,000), composition was within the range observed for N2 (Fig. 2A). Increased permissiveness of the defective grinder did not substantially affect community assembly, consistent with previous results (24).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

PCA of intestinal community composition in N2 wild-type (n = 164; black points) and mutant hosts colonized from a uniform metacommunity of eight bacterial species from the C. elegans native microbiome. (A to D) Subplots of the large ordination shown in its entirety in Fig. S3B; all worms except the constitutive daf-2 dauer mutant were grown to adulthood at 25°C. (A) Mild (eat-14; n = 69) and severe (phm-2; n = 78) grinder mutants; (B) p38 MAPK pathway-defective (AU37; n = 115) and derepressed (vhp-1; n = 84) mutants, with a glp-4 (n = 36) control for the AU37 strain; (C) TGF-β defective mutant (dbl-1; n = 69) and overexpression construct (ctls40; n = 48); (D) DAF-2/IGF defective (daf-16; n = 100) and derepressed (daf-2; n = 98) mutants. (E) Separate ordination, based on data from worms grown to adulthood at 16°C. When all worm hosts are grown to adulthood at 16°C, the double mutant CF1449 is indistinguishable from the daf-16 single mutant. Growth to adulthood at 16°C alters the later acquisition of microbial communities when adult worms (N2 and daf-16 strains) are colonized at 25°C. All data represent the results of single-worm digests and plating after 4 days total colonization on the uniformly distributed synthetic eight-species bacterial consortium. Ellipses for center of mass of the data associated with each host strain were generated using coord.ellipse (R package FactoMineR) with a confidence of 0.9999.

FIG S3

Mutant strains of C. elegans show differences in intestinal community composition when colonized under identical conditions. (A and B) Adult worms were grown to day 1 adults at 25°C, except the daf-2 strain, which was grown to adulthood at 16°C to prevent dauer formation. Data are the same as those shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2A to D. (A) Average relative abundance of eight bacterial species in gut communities of mechanical mutants and immune system mutants of C. elegans. AU37, n = 115; ctls40, n = 48; daf-16, n = 98; daf-2, n = 98; eat-14, n = 69; glp-4, n = 36; N2, n = 164; phm-2, n = 78; vhp-1; n = 84. (B) All-samples plot of the principal-component analysis (PCA) shown in Fig. 2 (n = 861). (C and D) Adult worms were grown to day 1 adults at 16°C or 25°C as indicated; the daf-2 mutant and the daf-2; daf-16 double mutant (CF1449) were grown to adulthood at 16°C to prevent dauer formation. All worms were colonized at 25°C according to standard protocols. (C) Average relative abundance of eight bacterial species in gut communities of worms grown to adulthood at 16°C or 25°C. N2 at 25°C, n = 164; N2 at 16°C, n = 38; daf-16 strain at 25°C, n = 98; daf-16 strain at 16°C, n = 43; daf-2 strain, n = 116; daf-2; daf-16 strain at 16°C, n = 35. (D) All-samples plot of the principal component analysis (PCA) of which Fig. 2E is a subset (n = 513). Download FIG S3, TIF file, 0.1 MB (144.3KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

We then explored the effect of the well-conserved innate immune system of C. elegans (25, 26) on composition of the microbiome. All three pathways of innate immunity (p38, transforming growth factor β [TGF-β], and DAF-2/insulin growth factor [IGF]) have been shown to be differentially expressed in worms raised on a complex microbiota compared with Escherichia coli (24). We found that bacterial communities in innate immunity mutants showed apparent differences from wild-type N2 (Fig. 2B to D), but the relationship between community composition and immune function in this host is complex. Neither gain nor loss of function in innate immune pathways had a consistent effect on microbiome composition. As previously described (24), loss of function in p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (AU37) produced microbial communities that compositionally resembled those in a glp-4(bn2ts) control and in N2; however, derepression of this pathway (vhp-1) resulted in a microbiome that appeared to diverge from that of N2 (Fig. 2B). Conversely, loss of function in TGF-β (dbl-1) produced communities that diverged from those of the wild type, as previously observed (24), while overexpression (ctls40) had no apparent effect (Fig. 2C). Finally, both loss of function (daf-16) and derepression (daf-2) of the DAF-2/IGF pathway produced marked effects on microbiome composition and variation (Fig. 2D).

We confirmed that microbial colonization under these conditions was associated with differential activation of daf-16 using a fluorescent reporter assay (Fig. S4). Intestinal community composition of the double mutant (daf-2; daf-16) was indistinguishable from that of the daf-16 single mutant (Fig. 2E), suggesting that the effects of the daf-2 mutation on microbiome composition are mediated through dysregulation of DAF-16. Further, when N2 and daf-16 worms are grown to adulthood at 16°C instead of 25°C to allow a more direct comparison with the double mutant, the communities acquired by these adults differ from those in worms of the same genotype grown to adulthood at 25°C, when colonized at 25°C according to the standard protocol (Fig. S3C and D).

FIG S4

Colonization by native microbiome bacteria is associated with changes in daf-16 activity as measured by a fluorescent reporter assay. (A) The daf-16 reporter shows activity relative to a nonfluorescent baseline (N2; Wilcoxon rank sum P values both <1e−9, Holm corrected). When the reporter strain is colonized on a metacommunity of seven bacterial species from the native worm microbiome (MYb27, -45, -53, -71, -120, -181, and -238), there is a nonsignificant trend in increased activity over the first few days of colonization in liquid culture (median log-transformed GFP day 1 = 1.49, day 3 = 1.39; Wilcoxon P value = 0.088, Holm corrected). (B) Induction of the daf-16 reporter after one day (24 h) of colonization on individual bacteria and the mixed metacommunity of all seven bacteria (Kruskal-Wallis test for differences between groups; chi-squared = 20.465, df = 9, P value = 0.01525). (C) Induction of the daf-16 reporter after three days of colonization on individual bacteria and the mixed metacommunity of all seven bacteria (Kruskal-Wallis test for differences between groups; chi-squared = 45.869, df = 8, P value = 2.518e−07). Download FIG S4, TIF file, 0.07 MB (70.7KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Next, we sought to establish ecological mechanisms underlying the observed differences in microbiome composition. As previously indicated, we chose to sample communities after 4 days of colonization to capture midsuccessional ecology. N2 wild-type worms showed a negative trend in the relationship between diversity (measured as Shannon H) and total microbiome size (CFU per worm in individual worms) (Fig. 3A), although the considerable compositional and structural variation in these communities (Fig. 1) results in a poor overall fit for the simple linear model (Table S1). Pharyngeal mutants showed diversity-size relationships similar to those of N2 (Fig. 3B), consistent with the compositional similarities observed (Fig. 2). Among the innate immune system mutants (Fig. 3C to E), most of the lineages that showed apparent compositional differences from N2 also showed differences in the diversity-size relationship (27) (vhp-1 mutant with likelihood ratio test P = 1.94 × 10−4; daf-2 mutant P = 5.55 × 10−7; and daf-16 mutant P = 1.61 × 10−9) (Table S1), suggesting that differences in competition between gut bacteria and the process of ecological succession underlie the observed differences in community composition. (Note that dbl-1 adults are physically smaller than N2 adults, which likely explains the smaller populations observed in these hosts [28]. Also, note that several of these linear fits indicate no significant relationship between Shannon diversity and total microbiome size, and the large β-diversity within host lineages is expected to be a factor here.)

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Successional ecology is altered by host genetic background. (A to E) Shannon diversity versus log10(CFU/worm) for the data set shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. S3. (A) N2 wild-type worms (n = 164) show a generally negative diversity-population size trend [linear fit y = 1.83 − 0.24x; R2(adj) = 0.09; P = 8.748e−5]. (B) Mechanical mutants (eat-14 and phm-2 mutants) show a trend similar to that of the wild type. (C to E) The diversity-population size relationship in intestinal bacterial communities differs across host lineages. Mutants in the (C) p38 MAPK, (D) TGF-β, and (E) DAF-2/IGF pathways show trends that diverge in some cases (see Table S1) from that observed in N2 (black dots). Note that Shannon diversity in these experiments has a maximum at ln(8) = 2.08. (F to H) Time series of the diversity-population size relationship indicate that succession is altered in DAF-2/IGF mutant hosts. Intestinal communities were quantified for individual worms (n = 24 worms per time point per condition) of (F) N2, (G) daf-16, and (H) daf-2 lineages after 2, 4, and 6 days of colonization on the uniform eight-species metacommunity. CFU-per-worm data underlying panels F to H are shown in Fig. S5.

TABLE S1

Diversity-size relationships, linear fits, and likelihood-ratio testing. (A) Linear model fits to single host strain data. Note that several of these fits are not significantly different from the fit of a horizontal line (m = 0), indicating no relationship between Shannon diversity and total microbiome size. SSE, sum of squared errors. (B) Linear model fits to data from each host strain pooled with N2 data, where the non-N2 strain is indicated as host 2. (C) Likelihood-ratio testing, where H0 (no difference between host lineages) is represented by the fit to pooled data and H1 (mutant host lineages show diversity-microbiome size relationships different from those of N2) is represented by the fits to single host strain data Table S1, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (12.1KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S5

Community composition data corresponding to Fig. 3. Data for day 2 (A, D, and G), day 4 (B, E, and H), and day 6 (C, F, and I) correspond to Fig. 3D to F. (J) Comparisons of total CFU per worm across host strains. Differences between groups were tested using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Asterisks represent significance levels after Bonferroni correction: ***, P < 0.0001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05. Download FIG S5, TIF file, 0.2 MB (174.7KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

If ecological succession differs between C. elegans mutant strains, there should be differences in microbiome development over time. Based on observed divergences from the wild type, we chose to use DAF-2/IGF mutant hosts in these experiments. Here, we colonized adult worms from the N2, daf-16, and daf-2 lineages with the uniform eight-species metacommunity and quantified intestinal communities at 48-h intervals during community development. In N2 hosts, we observe convergence of communities over time, as previously described (Fig. 1C); by day 6 of community development, N2-associated intestinal communities had largely converged to a fairly wide but well-defined range (103.5–4.5 CFU/worm; 0.5 < H < 1.5), and the negative diversity-population size relationship had diminished, suggesting a later stage of succession (Fig. 3F; Fig. S5A to C). daf-16 hosts displayed large populations which continued to increase in size and diversity over the observed period (Fig. 3G; Fig. S5D to F), while daf-2 hosts showed convergence to smaller microbiomes consisting mainly of three dominant bacteria (Fig. 3H; Fig. S5G to I). These data suggest that differences in ecological succession underlie the observed differences in community composition. However, it is not clear what mechanism(s) underlies these differences.

DAF-2 signaling alters host control of microbiome assembly.

Genetic differences between hosts could alter microbiome ecology by altering the efficiency of host selection during colonization (environmental filtering), by changing the interspecies interactions among bacteria, or both. This should be associated with differences in interspecies correlations within these communities. In this scenario, the daf-2 mutant is hypothesized to represent a highly selective environment; due to strong interactions with the host, bacterial density rarely rises to the level where competition between strains is a major influence. The anticipated outcome would be strong compositional convergence enforced by environmental filtering and weak negative correlations among bacterial species. Conversely, the daf-16 mutant is hypothesized to represent an environment with poor active selection by the host. A lack of host control could produce the large and diverse communities observed and should result in stronger-than-expected correlations (negative and/or positive) among bacterial strains due to increased interaction in the intestine.

To test this hypothesis, we first calculated the Spearman correlations for pairs of bacterial species within each of N2, daf-16, and daf-2 hosts, using the large data set underlying Fig. 2. Intestinal communities in all host lineages showed a range of correlations, and the distributions of interspecies correlations differed across hosts. The daf-16 communities showed a broad distribution of correlations relative to N2, with fewer near-zero interactions, while daf-2 communities showed stronger positive correlations but weaker negative correlations than those in N2 (Fig. 4A to C; Fig. S6A to F), consistent with the hypothesis. Note that positive correlations in these data need not reflect true positive interactions between species; a positive relationship between counts of two bacteria can simply reflect common species being common together, when the number of total bacteria varies among samples as it does in these data.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Spearman correlations between bacteria in host-associated intestinal communities differ from the predictions of a neutral sampling model. (A to C) Histograms of Spearman correlation coefficients calculated from data for (A) N2 (n = 164), (B) daf-16 (n = 100), and (C) daf-2 (n = 98) intestinal communities, with a bin size of 0.1. (D to I) Histograms of Spearman coefficient 20th and 80th quantiles from data simulated using host lineage-specific parameterizations of the Dirichlet-multinomial model (n = 10,000 simulated data sets per condition). Red lines indicate the corresponding quantile from the empirical data, and P values indicate the one-tailed percentage of simulated data sets with a lower 20th quantile (D to F) or higher 80th quantile (G to I) than the empirical data.

FIG S6

Spearman correlation coefficients and histograms. (A to F) Correlation coefficients from real data. (A and B) N2 (n = 164), (C and D) daf-16 mutant (n = 100), and (E and F) daf-2 mutant (n = 98) intestinal communities. (G to J) Correlation coefficients from simulated N2 data, demonstrating that negative correlations in the Dirichlet-multinomial (DMN) simulations are spurious and due to small-number effects. Spearman correlation coefficients simulated from the Dirichlet-multinomial distribution, as fitted to N2 data, for one example simulation each with (G and H) 164 or (I and J) 16,400 worms. Download FIG S6, TIF file, 0.3 MB (311.9KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

We therefore sought to quantify expectations for these distributions that take into account differences in sample size between lineages and in community size between individuals. As a full stochastic model of colonization would require estimation (empirical or otherwise) of a fairly large number of parameters, we opted for a simpler data-driven approach where we fitted each data set to a neutral sampling distribution.

The Dirichlet-multinomial distribution is a multivariate sampling distribution that has frequently been used to describe community data of this kind (2931). In the neutral sampling process described by this model, bacterial species are allowed to have different probabilities of being “drawn” from the pool of potential colonists (in this scenario, where all species are present at equal levels in the metacommunity, this corresponds to different effective migration rates into the host) but species do not differ in their ability to fill space (compete) within the host. By comparing the empirical distributions of correlations to those produced under the neutral sampling assumption, we can determine whether our hypothesis—that the host immune system modifies the effective strength of interactions between bacteria in the gut, possibly by changing the relative importance of interactions with the host—is supported.

We fitted this model to our data and used these parameterized distributions to generate simulated communities that replicate the structure of the real data, with the same number of hosts and the same number of bacteria in each host (Fig. S6 and S7). By generating a large number of simulated data sets (n = 10,000) for each host lineage, we can compare the correlations observed between bacterial species in real communities to those obtained from similar-quality simulated data where there are no true interactions between bacterial species. This allows us to assess the weight of evidence that interspecies interactions are important in each set of communities. Note that in this neutral model, real positive correlations are due simply to common species being common together, and negative interactions are spurious and appear solely due to limitations in sampling (Fig. S6G to J).

FIG S7

Fitting the worm microbiome with the Dirichlet-multinomial distribution. Here, we show (A) the N2 community data used to fit the model and (B) one example simulated data set drawn from the resulting distribution, both with 164 individual hosts. Download FIG S7, TIF file, 2.0 MB (2MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

As expected, intestinal communities in the host diverge from the predictions of the neutral sampling model. In all three C. elegans strains, we observe more positive correlations than expected (Fig. 4G to I), suggesting that positive interactions among bacteria occurred within the worm host. Consistent with our hypothesis, the significance of this trend is strongest in the daf-16 strain, where we hypothesized that host control is weakest and interactions among microbes strongest in shaping community composition. The N2 and daf-16 hosts both show more negative correlations than expected (Fig. 4D and E); the trend is significant in daf-16 communities but not in those of N2, again consistent with the predictions of our hypothesis. Interestingly, daf-2 communities show significantly fewer negative correlations than expected (Fig. 4F), consistent with the prediction that negative interactions between bacterial species, such as competition, are less important in this apparently stringent host environment.

DAF-2 signaling alters sensitivity of the microbiome to changes in colonization.

If the innate immune system actively shapes the microbiome by changing its ecological dynamics, intestinal communities in immune-mutant host strains should show different sensitivities to perturbation as a result. Specifically, we predict that communities in these hosts should react differently to a small change in the relative abundance of species in the metacommunity during community assembly, wherein one bacterial species is “dropped down” to 10% relative abundance. Here, we used a seven-species bacterial metacommunity; MYb56 (Bacillus) was removed due to high variation (24). In these experiments, the “rare” species will experience a drop in expected rate of migration into the host (7), resulting in reduced propagule pressure (number of individuals of this species introduced per event, or per unit of time) and thus increased variation in time to first successful colonization. We chose this setup (as opposed to a larger perturbation such as successive introduction of species) precisely because the mechanism we propose should be sensitive even to a small change in propagule pressure and because the increased variation in colonization by the rare species could increase community variation between individual hosts if priority effects are important (3234).

We expect this perturbation to have specific effects if there are substantial priority effects (where the early composition of the community affects the species-specific probability of success of later colonists) mediated by interspecies interactions. We should see very little effect in a highly stringent host (daf-2) where environmental filtering dominates, as we expect bacterial species to colonize based on ability to survive this environment rather than on ability to interact with other colonizers. Conversely, this perturbation may have a large effect in an uncontrolled host (daf-16) where interactions between bacteria, rather than interactions with the host, are the (theorized) dominant force driving community assembly.

Other outcomes are possible. If priority effects are mediated through changes in the host state rather than through interactions between bacterial species, this perturbation should produce smaller changes in environments where host control is of less relative importance (N2 and daf-16) than in environments where the host is the dominant factor (daf-2). Alternately, if these systems are not driven by priority effects, the small perturbation introduced in these experiments should not alter community composition.

Our results (Fig. 5; Data Set S1) indicate that host genetics do affect the stability properties of the intestinal community. For N2 and daf-16 intestinal communities, it is immediately clear that (with the possible exception of the drop-53 condition) (Fig. 5B and G) the perturbation has little or no effect on community composition. These host lineages show a broad but defined range of community compositions when colonized by the full experimental metacommunity (All-7), and the range is essentially recapitulated across conditions. This indicates that these communities are, as suggested previously, converging to a defined range and that this convergence is stable against the small perturbation applied here.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Intestinal bacterial communities in different host lineages react differently to a shared perturbation. In these experiments, adult worms were colonized with an even metacommunity of seven bacterial species (MYb27, -45, -53, -71, -120, -181, -238 [All-7]) or a metacommunity where each species in turn is dropped (indicated with the letter “d”) to 10% relative abundance. Worms were sampled at day 6 of colonization to allow time for communities to pass through early ecological succession. Data represent two (daf-16 mutant) or three (N2 and daf-2 mutant) independent runs, with 12 individual worms per host lineage/metacommunity combination; individual worms with <100 CFU (daf-2) or <1,000 CFU (N2 and daf-16 mutant) were removed from data to minimize errors due to low colony counts.

In contrast, communities in the daf-2 intestine (Fig. 5K to O) occupied a relatively confined ordination space in the All-7 colonization condition, and several of the drop-down colonization conditions (notably, drop-71, -120, and -238) resulted in partial or total separation from the All-7 communities. Interestingly, run-to-run variation was considerable in daf-2 mutant communities but not in N2 communities (Fig. S8). Even within the All-7 condition, it is clear that individual replicates for daf-2 mutant communities represent different subsets of the total outcome space, while N2-associated communities tend to cover similar ranges across days. In two conditions (drop-71 and drop-120), one of three replicates diverged entirely from All-7, and in one condition (drop-238), all three replicates diverged from this baseline. These results are inconsistent with simple sources of experimental error (which would most likely have produced a single divergent run) and indicate that bacterial communities in the daf-2 mutant have stability properties different from those of communities in N2 or daf-16 hosts. Specifically, daf-2 host communities appear to be both more deterministic (converging to a narrow range of outcomes for a given metacommunity) and more sensitive to initial conditions (such as inevitable run-to-run variation in the metacommunity [see the supplemental figure at 10.6084/m9.figshare.13317275]) than either N2 or the daf-16 mutant. While these experiments are inadequate to fully describe the stability properties of these intestinal communities, these results are consistent with community landscapes for N2 and daf-16 strains characterized by wide, stable attractors, while daf-2 host communities appear to occupy a landscape with multiple alternate states (but see Discussion). Further, these results are collectively consistent with the hypothesis that assembly of N2 and daf-16 mutant communities relies on interspecies interactions among bacteria, while assembly of communities in the daf-2 host is controlled largely by the host, and host state changes (plausibly due in part to interactions with bacteria early in colonization) constrain the outcomes of community assembly.

FIG S8

Intestinal bacterial communities in different host lineages react differently to a shared perturbation, and run-to-run variation is different across host lineages. In these experiments, adult worms were colonized with an even metacommunity of seven bacterial species (MYb27, -45, -53, -71, -120, -181, and -238 [All-7]) or a metacommunity where each species in turn is dropped (shown with the letter “d”) to 10% relative abundance. Data represent three (N2 and daf-2 hosts) independent runs, 12 individual worms per host lineage/metacommunity combination; individual worms with <100 CFU (daf-2 mutant) or <1,000 CFU (N2) were removed from data to minimize errors due to low plate counts. Individual replicates are indicated in the figure legends. Download FIG S8, TIF file, 0.10 MB (100.9KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DISCUSSION

Here, we used a tractable model system to demonstrate how host genetics can alter microbiome composition and how the mechanisms underlying these compositional differences can result in differences in response to perturbation. We observe that changes in C. elegans immunity and stress response, in particular in the DAF-2/IGF pathway, are associated with changes in community assembly over time and in stability against perturbations in colonization conditions. These differences in stability result in different possible community states for a given starting condition, indicating that genetic differences in the host can affect the normal operating range and accessibility of alternate states for a microbiome.

These results demonstrate the importance of microbiome ecology for understanding dysbiosis. We observed that host-mediated differences in the ecological drivers of community dynamics result in differences in the availability and accessibility of alternate compositional states. These results suggest that differences in ecological dynamics can produce qualitative differences in propensity toward dysbiosis and the likelihood of return to “normal.” By understanding the drivers of microbiome ecology, it may be possible to gain information about vulnerability to dysbiosis and to predict what types of intervention might be most effective at altering a given community.

It is important to note that these microbiome communities are likely not at a deterministic steady state. First, these are fundamentally not equilibrium systems; these communities are subject to continual disturbance from forces such as migration and physiological shifts in the host (35). Second, even if these communities were heading for a deterministic equilibrium, the relatively short life span of the host probably means that intestinal communities are in a transient state (7, 34, 36). Finally, the properties of the host and the intestinal environment are expected to change with age (3739). Broadly, our results are consistent with previous descriptions of homeorhesis in synthetic communities (40), where a nonstationary system such as a microbiome converges to a trajectory rather than a deterministic point equilibrium, but it is also likely that our communities were in transient states. It is important to consider the underlying dynamics to understand how these results can be generalized, but the conclusions from the data are unaffected; we found distinct and replicable differences in community states and trajectories between different host strains, indicating differences in microbiome ecology driven by host genetics.

Our results are consistent with prior data on host genetics and intestinal community composition in C. elegans, but they differ in some particulars (24). Grinder-deficient worms (tnt-3 mutants in the previous study, phm-2 mutants here) show increased population sizes in the gut but no significant changes in community composition compared with N2. Likewise, both studies indicate that all three pathways of innate immunity may be invoked during response of this host to bacteria from its natural habitats. Berg et al. (24) observed that communities in dbl-1 mutants (TGF-β defective) diverged strongly from those in N2, while we saw a smaller effect in this mutant; the previous study focused on differences in Enterobacteriaceae abundance, and this clade is not represented in our minimal eight-species community. However, we observed a measurable effect of dbl-1 even in the absence of Enterobacteriaceae, and the previous study did not observe significant community effects in DAF-2/IGF mutants. It is plausible that the different bacterial community and/or the highly controlled liquid culture environment used here (compared with the experimental soil microcosm approach in the previous study) allowed us to detect these genetic effects.

The use of a highly controlled environment carries benefits and drawbacks. We chose to use a minimal eight-species community for tractability and to select our community to represent a taxonomically and functionally diverse subset of the native host microbiome to allow a range of possible interactions between species (20, 21). However, the small size of this community means that extrapolation to larger microbiota should be done with caution. We selected a well-controlled, well-mixed environment where worms were grown in liquid medium because it can be replicated accurately, thus allowing us to minimize environmental variation and thereby increase our ability to detect genetic effects. However, as is always the case when a system is abstracted to increase control, this comes at the cost of reducing realism; among other factors, C. elegans is not adapted to swimming, and real environments are patchy. It remains unclear how environmental effects might combine with genetic factors to affect the stability properties of host-associated microbial communities. Although there is considerable prior work on the relative contribution of environmental and genetic factors on observed variation in microbiome composition (6, 4144), at present there is neither theory nor experimental data sufficient for a systems-level explanation of how environment and genetics might act together, or how these interactions can be expected to affect response of microbiomes to perturbation.

Interpretation of these results is complicated by the pleotropic nature of worm genetics. For example, DBL-1 is important in development as well as immunity (45). Disruption of glp-4 is known to have broad effects, including changes in protein translation (46); the glp-4 mutant was used here as a control for AU37, and the vhp-1 (sa66) mutant used here for upregulation of p38 does not have the glp-4 mutation. Further, this vhp-1 allele is probably hypomorphic (null alleles are lethal [47, 48]) with respect to p38 regulation. While our results suggest a complex role for innate immunity in regulation of the worm gut microbiome, further investigation of specific pathways is needed to disentangle immunity from other functions.

There are multiple mechanisms by which DAF-2/IGF signaling might control microbiome composition. This pathway has been implicated in a broad range of stress responses (49, 50), including oxidative stress and xenobiotics, in addition to response to bacterial pathogens, with daf-2 mutants showing broadly increased resistance (51, 52). Total bacterial colonization can be affected, with daf-2 mutants showing lower colonization than N2, but increased colonization is not always observed in daf-16 mutants (53). Some data indicate that DAF-16 is not primarily involved in pathogen response but instead maintains a basal level of innate immunity, which regulates response to, and survival in the presence of, nonpathogenic or minimally pathogenic bacteria such as OP50 (54, 55). However, DAF-2/IGF is an insulin signaling pathway involved in satiety and quiescence behaviors, and we cannot presently rule out the possibility of behavioral differences, such as feeding rate, that might alter bacterial community assembly (56). Further, E. coli organisms colonizing DAF-2/IGF mutants show differences in gene expression compared with those colonizing wild-type N2 (57), suggesting that different bacterial factors are required for success; in our multispecies communities, this might result in differences in filtering based on metabolic capacity and/or differences in competitive ability based on metabolic shifts during colonization. Further, we observed that intestinal acidity is important in filtering and bacterial competition in C. elegans (58), and DAF-16 has been shown to promote acidification of intestinal lysosomes (59); if daf-2 and daf-16 mutants are at opposite ends of a spectrum of intestinal acidification, that might explain differences in the stringency of these host environments. Further research, including gene expression analysis in colonized hosts, is necessary to resolve these questions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and culture conditions.

Arthrobacter aurescens (MYb27), Microbacterium oxydans (MYb45), Rhodococcus erythropolis PR4 (MYb53), Bacillus sp. strain SG20 (MYb56), Ochrobactrum sp. strain R-26465 (anthropi) (MYb71), Chryseobacterium sp. strain CHNTR56 (MYb120), Sphingobacterium faecium (MYb181), and Stenotrophomonas sp. (MYb238) were obtained from the Schulenburg lab (20). Bacterial strains were grown for 48 h at 25°C with shaking at 300 rpm in individual culture tubes with 1 ml of LB.

One hundred milliliters of 100% C. elegans axenic medium (AXN) was prepared according to published protocols (60) by autoclaving 3 g yeast extract and 3 g soy peptone (Bacto) in 90 ml water and subsequently adding 1 g dextrose, 200 μl of 5 mg/ml cholesterol in ethanol, and 10 ml of 0.5% (wt/vol) hemoglobin in 1 mM NaOH. To construct cultures to feed C. elegans, appropriate volumes of each strain to attain ∼108 CFU/ml were washed in S-medium containing 1% AXN, and strains were centrifuged 2 min at 10,000 rpm to pellet and then resuspended in 1 ml S-medium plus 1% AXN.

Laboratory wild-type (N2) C. elegans and mutant strains (Table 1) were obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetic Center, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). Nematodes were grown, maintained, and manipulated using standard techniques (61). Briefly, breeding stocks were maintained on nematode growth medium (NGM) plates with OP50 at 25°C (16°C for temperature-sensitive strains CB1370 [daf-2], AU37 [glp-4; sek-1], and SS104 [glp-4]) and synchronized using a standard bleach/NaOH protocol where eggs were allowed to hatch in M9 worm buffer overnight (∼16 h) with shaking (200 rpm) at 25°C. Starved L1 larvae were transferred to 10-cm NGM plates containing lawns of E. coli pos-1 RNA interference (RNAi) and incubated at 25°C for 3 days (most) or 16°C (the daf-2 strain and CF1449; also N2 and the daf-16 strain when specifically stated) to produce reproductively sterile adults; temperature-sensitive sterile strains AU37 and glp-4 were grown to adulthood on OP50 under the same conditions. As some of the mutants used here develop to adulthood at different rates, care was taken to arrange and/or stagger synchronizations such that all strains within a given experiment reached adulthood at the same time. Worms were then transferred to liquid S-medium containing 200 μg/ml gentamicin, 50 μg/ml chloramphenicol, and 2× heat-killed OP50 (to trigger feeding) for 24 h, resulting in largely germfree adults (see the supplemental figure at 10.6084/m9.figshare.13317275). Adult worms were washed via sucrose flotation before colonization (61).

Colonization of worms in liquid culture.

Bacterial strains were grown separately in 1 ml LB cultures for 48 h at 25°C and diluted to a uniform cell density of 108 CFU/ml. Colonization was performed in well-mixed liquid media according to standard protocols (7) to ensure that all individuals experienced a uniform environment and had equal access to all potential colonists for the duration of colonization. Germfree adult worms were resuspended in S-medium plus 1% AXN to a concentration of ∼1,000 worms/ml. Aliquots of 40 μl were pipetted into 96-well deep culture plates (1.2-ml well volume; VWR). A 20-μl portion of each bacterial suspension was added to each well (final volume, 200 μl). Plates were covered with Breathe-Easy sealing membranes and incubated with shaking at 200 rpm at 25°C.

After 2 days, worms were washed to remove external bacteria and refed on a freshly assembled metacommunity; this was done to enforce an evenly distributed community, maximize viability of potential colonists, and minimize bacterial evolution that might lead to unpredictable divergence across replicates. In this step, worms were washed twice in 1 ml of M9 worm buffer plus 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 (M9TX1), rinsed once with S-medium plus 1% AXN to remove surfactant, and resuspended in 100 μl of S-medium plus 1% AXN. Worms were fed as previously described in a fresh 96-deep-well plate.

Mechanical disruption of colonized worms.

Prior to disruption, colonized worms were washed twice in M9TX1 and moved to an inert food source (heat-killed OP50) for 30 min to purge nonadhered bacteria from the gut and then washed and surfaced bleached to remove external bacteria before mechanical disruption of individual worms to retrieve intestinal communities. To clean the exterior cuticle, worms were rinsed twice with M9TX1, cooled for 15 min at 4°C to stop peristalsis, and bleached for 15 min at 4°C with 100 μl M9 plus 0.2% (vol/vol) commercial bleach (see the supplemental figure at 10.6084/m9.figshare.13317275). Worms were then rinsed twice with M9TX1 to remove bleach, treated with 100 μl of SDS/dithiothreitol (DTT) solution (965 μl M9 plus 5 μl SDS plus 30 μl 1 M DTT) for 20 min to permeabilize the worms, and washed once in 1 ml M9. A deep-well plate (2 ml square-well plate; Axygen) was prepared by adding ∼0.2 g of sterile 36-mesh silicon carbide grit (Kramer Industries) and 180 μl of M9TX1 to each well. Worm samples were transferred to a 35-mm petri dish with 3 ml of M9TX1, and individual worms were pipetted manually into wells in 20 μl aliquots. The plate was covered with Parafilm and kept at 4°C for 1 h to reduce heat damage to bacteria. Parafilm-covered plates were capped with square silicon sealing mats (AxyMat) and disrupted by shaking in a Qiagen TissueLyser II at 30 Hz for 3 min. Plates were then centrifuged at 2,500 × g for 2 min to collect all material, resuspended by pipetting, and transferred to 96-well plates for 10-fold serial dilution in PBS (200-μl final volume per well).

Measurement of bacterial communities.

Worm digests were dilution plated onto solid agar for quantification of intestinal communities; bacteria of different types were distinguished on the basis of colony morphology (Fig. S1). Serial dilutions of 10−1 and 10−2 of the digests, with the exception of strains DA597 and CB1370, were plated onto modified salt-free nutrient agar (3 g yeast extract, 5 g peptone, and 15 g of agar [Bacto] per liter). For strain DA597 (phm-2), dilutions of 10−2 and 10−3 were plated. Dilutions of 100 and 10−1 were plated for CB1370 (daf-2). In all cases, 100-μl aliquots (of a 200-μl total volume) were plated onto individual 10-cm plates using bead shaking. Samples were incubated at 25°C for 48 to 72 h to allow distinct morphologies to develop. Colonies were then counted, and the number of CFU per worm was calculated for each sample. All worm strains in the data set are represented by multiple biological replicates, conducted on separate days, with 12 to 36 worms taken per host strain per experiment depending on the total number of strains in that experiment (Data Set S1; Table 1).

Expression of daf-16.

C. elegans carrying a DAF-16::green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion [daf-16 (mu86) + Pdaf-16::DAF-16::GFP) was generously provided by Daniel Kalman. DAF-16::GFP worms were cultivated, and synchronized cultures were raised to adulthood, at 16°C using protocols described above. Synchronized, reproductively sterile adults were colonized as described above. GFP fluorescence in individual worms was read on a COPAS Biosorter after 24 h (day 1) and 72 h (day 3); worms were refed on day 2 according to standard protocols.

Community analysis, fitting, and ordination.

Data analysis was performed in R. Prior to analysis, data were filtered to remove individual worms with <100 CFU/worm (daf-2) or <1,000 CFU/worm (all other worm strains) to minimize errors from low counts on plates. Bacterial count data were log transformed and standardized using the function decostand in vegan (62), and principal-component analysis was performed using PCA from FactoMineR (63). Bray-Curtis distances were calculated from log-transformed data using vegdist, and Shannon diversity was obtained using the function diversity in vegan.

Dirichlet-multinomial fitting and simulations were performed using the package dirmult (64). Raw data were fitted using the core function dirmult, and simulated data were generated using simpop with the resulting parameters (Table 2). To generate simulated data sets for each host lineage, simpop was executed with host-specific parameters and a sample size drawn from the vector of total CFU per milliliter for that host; each sample in the original data set is simulated this way, resulting in a synthetic data set containing the same number of individual hosts with the same CFU/ml as in the original data. In these simulations, 10,000 data sets were simulated for each host lineage. Spearman correlations were calculated for each real and simulated data set using rcorr from the package Hmisc (65).

TABLE 2.

Dirichlet-multinomial maximum-likelihood fit parameters for N2, daf-16 mutant, and daf-2 mutant multispecies colonization data

Strain or mutation (n) Value for:
Theta logLik value
pi:MYb120 pi:MYb181 pi:MYb238 pi:MYb27 pi:MYb45 pi:MYb53 pi:MYb56 pi:MYb71
N2 (164) 0.0096 0.0015 0.0384 0.0866 0.029 0.0828 0.0903 0.6619 0.1698 −2.20E + 06
daf-16 (100) 0.0063 0.004 0.0594 0.2409 0.0237 0.0738 0.0592 0.5327 0.1597 −2.21E + 06
daf-2 (98) 0.0006 NA 0.0616 0.044 0.0133 0.1099 0.0719 0.6986 0.2524 −1.03E + 05

Data for the drop-down assays (Fig. 5) were further filtered before analysis to remove data for MYb181 bacteria from daf-2 (no counts of this species) and N2 (nonzero counts in 10 of 156 worms), as inclusion of this species resulted in overweighting of rare MYb181 presence. Communities from daf-16 worms showed higher prevalence of MYb181 (nonzero counts in 22 of 126 worms), and as removal of this species made no appreciable difference in the qualitative results of the ordination, it was not removed.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. This work was supported by funds provided by Emory College.

We thank Daniel Kalman and Guy Benian at Emory for generously providing us with worm strains.

Contributor Information

N. M. Vega, Email: nvega@emory.edu.

John F. Rawls, Duke University School of Medicine

Julia Johnke, University of Kiel.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Coyte KZ, Schluter J, Foster KR. 2015. The ecology of the microbiome: networks, competition, and stability. Science 350:663–666. doi: 10.1126/science.aad2602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boon E, Meehan CJ, Whidden C, Wong DH-J, Langille MGI, Beiko RG. 2014. Interactions in the microbiome: communities of organisms and communities of genes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38:90–118. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shade A, Peter H, Allison SD, Baho DL, Berga M, Bürgmann H, Huber DH, Langenheder S, Lennon JT, Martiny JBH, Matulich KL, Schmidt TM, Handelsman J. 2012. Fundamentals of microbial community resistance and resilience. Front Microbiol 3:417. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shade A. 2018. Understanding microbiome stability in a changing world. mSystems 3:e00157-17. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00157-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Costello EK, Berg-Lyons D, Gonzalez A, Stombaugh J, Knights D, Gajer P, Ravel J, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R. 2011. Moving pictures of the human microbiome. Genome Biol 12:R50. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-r50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Falony G, Joossens M, Vieira-Silva S, Wang J, Darzi Y, Faust K, Kurilshikov A, Bonder MJ, Valles-Colomer M, Vandeputte D, Tito RY, Chaffron S, Rymenans L, Verspecht C, De Sutter L, Lima-Mendez G, D'hoe K, Jonckheere K, Homola D, Garcia R, Tigchelaar EF, Eeckhaudt L, Fu J, Henckaerts L, Zhernakova A, Wijmenga C, Raes J. 2016. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science 352:560–564. doi: 10.1126/science.aad3503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vega NM, Gore J. 2017. Stochastic assembly produces heterogeneous communities in the Caenorhabditis elegans intestine. PLoS Biol 15:e2000633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hubbell SP. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography (MPB-32). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Burns AR, Miller E, Agarwal M, Rolig AS, Milligan-Myhre K, Seredick S, Guillemin K, Bohannan BJM. 2017. Interhost dispersal alters microbiome assembly and can overwhelm host innate immunity in an experimental zebrafish model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:11181–11186. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702511114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Burns AR, Stephens WZ, Stagaman K, Wong S, Rawls JF, Guillemin K, Bohannan BJ. 2016. Contribution of neutral processes to the assembly of gut microbial communities in the zebrafish over host development. ISME J 10:655–664. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Obadia B, Güvener ZT, Zhang V, Ceja-Navarro JA, Brodie EL, Ja WW, Ludington WB. 2017. Probabilistic invasion underlies natural gut microbiome stability. Curr Biol 27:1999–2006.E8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aranda-Díaz A, Obadia B, Dodge R, Thomsen T, Hallberg ZF, Güvener ZT, Ludington WB, Huang KC. 2020. Bacterial interspecies interactions modulate pH-mediated antibiotic tolerance. Elife 9:e51493. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Robinson CD, Klein HS, Murphy KD, Parthasarathy R, Guillemin K, Bohannan BJM. 2018. Experimental bacterial adaptation to the zebrafish gut reveals a primary role for immigration. PLoS Biol 16:e2006893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kashyap PC, Marcobal A, Ursell LK, Smits SA, Sonnenburg ED, Costello EK, Higginbottom SK, Domino SE, Holmes SP, Relman DA, Knight R, Gordon JI, Sonnenburg JL. 2013. Genetically dictated change in host mucus carbohydrate landscape exerts a diet-dependent effect on the gut microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:17059–17064. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306070110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen L, Wilson JE, Koenigsknecht MJ, Chou W-C, Montgomery SA, Truax AD, Brickey WJ, Packey CD, Maharshak N, Matsushima GK, Plevy SE, Young VB, Sartor RB, Ting JP-Y. 2017. NLRP12 attenuates colon inflammation by maintaining colonic microbial diversity and promoting protective commensal bacterial growth. Nat Immunol 18:541–551. doi: 10.1038/ni.3690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wiles TJ, Jemielita M, Baker RP, Schlomann BH, Logan SL, Ganz J, Melancon E, Eisen JS, Guillemin K, Parthasarathy R. 2016. Host gut motility promotes competitive exclusion within a model intestinal microbiota. PLoS Biol 14:e1002517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Thiemann S, Smit N, Roy U, Lesker TR, Gálvez EJC, Helmecke J, Basic M, Bleich A, Goodman AL, Kalinke U, Flavell RA, Erhardt M, Strowig T. 2017. Enhancement of IFNγ production by distinct commensals ameliorates Salmonella-induced disease. Cell Host Microbe 21:682–694.E5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Round JL, Mazmanian SK. 2009. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9:313–323. doi: 10.1038/nri2515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Derrien M, van Baarlen P, Hooiveld G, Norin E, Muller M, de Vos W. 2011. Modulation of mucosal immune response, tolerance, and proliferation in mice colonized by the mucin-degrader Akkermansia muciniphila. Front Microbiol 2:166. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dirksen P, Marsh SA, Braker I, Heitland N, Wagner S, Nakad R, Mader S, Petersen C, Kowallik V, Rosenstiel P, Félix M-A, Schulenburg H. 2016. The native microbiome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: gateway to a new host-microbiome model. BMC Biol 14:38. doi: 10.1186/s12915-016-0258-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zimmermann J, Obeng N, Yang W, Pees B, Petersen C, Waschina S, Kissoyan KA, Aidley J, Hoeppner MP, Bunk B, Spröer C, Leippe M, Dierking K, Kaleta C, Schulenburg H. 2020. The functional repertoire contained within the native microbiota of the model nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. ISME J 14:26–38. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0504-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Avery L. 1993. The genetics of feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 133:897–917. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.4.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kumar S, Egan BM, Kocsisova Z, Schneider DL, Murphy JT, Diwan A, Kornfeld K. 2019. Lifespan extension in C. elegans caused by bacterial colonization of the intestine and subsequent activation of an innate immune response. Dev Cell 49:100–117.E6. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Berg M, Monnin D, Cho J, Nelson L, Crits-Christoph A, Shapira M. 2019. TGFβ/BMP immune signaling affects abundance and function of C. elegans gut commensals. Nat Commun 10:604. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08379-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alper S, McBride SJ, Lackford B, Freedman JH, Schwartz DA. 2007. Specificity and complexity of the Caenorhabditis elegans innate immune response. Mol Cell Biol 27:5544–5553. doi: 10.1128/MCB.02070-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Irazoqui JE, Urbach JM, Ausubel FM. 2010. Evolution of host innate defence: insights from Caenorhabditis elegans and primitive invertebrates. Nat Rev Immunol 10:47–58. doi: 10.1038/nri2689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cerrato RM. 1990. Interpretable statistical tests for growth comparisons using parameters in the von Bertalanffy equation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:1416–1426. doi: 10.1139/f90-160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gumienny TL, Savage-Dunn C. 2013. TGF-β signaling in C. elegans. WormBook 2013:1–34. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.22.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Holmes I, Harris K, Quince C. 2012. Dirichlet multinomial mixtures: generative models for microbial metagenomics. PLoS One 7:e30126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ding T, Schloss PD. 2014. Dynamics and associations of microbial community types across the human body. Nature 509:357–360. doi: 10.1038/nature13178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Harrison JG, Calder WJ, Shastry V, Buerkle CA. 2020. Dirichlet-multinomial modelling outperforms alternatives for analysis of microbiome and other ecological count data. Mol Ecol Resour 20:481–497. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chase JM. 2010. Stochastic community assembly causes higher biodiversity in more productive environments. Science 328:1388–1391. doi: 10.1126/science.1187820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fukami T. 2004. Community assembly along a species pool gradient: implications for multiple-scale patterns of species diversity. Popul Ecol 46:137–147. doi: 10.1007/s10144-004-0182-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fukami T, Nakajima M. 2011. Community assembly: alternative stable states or alternative transient states? Ecol Lett 14:973–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01663.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pickett STA, White PS. 1985. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sieber M, Pita L, Weiland-Bräuer N, Dirksen P, Wang J, Mortzfeld B, Franzenburg S, Schmitz RA, Baines JF, Fraune S, Hentschel U, Schulenburg H, Bosch TCG, Traulsen A. 2019. Neutrality in the metaorganism. PLoS Biol 17:e3000298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Youngman MJ, Rogers ZN, Kim DH. 2011. A decline in p38 MAPK signaling underlies immunosenescence in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet 7:e1002082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Eckley DM, Rahimi S, Mantilla S, Orlov NV, Coletta CE, Wilson MA, Iser WB, Delaney JD, Zhang Y, Wood W, Becker KG, Wolkow CA, Goldberg IG. 2013. Molecular characterization of the transition to mid-life in Caenorhabditis elegans. Age (Dordr) 35:689–703. doi: 10.1007/s11357-012-9401-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.McGee MD, Weber D, Day N, Vitelli C, Crippen D, Herndon LA, Hall DH, Melov S. 2011. Loss of intestinal nuclei and intestinal integrity in aging. Aging Cell 10:699–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00713.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chuang JS, Frentz Z, Leibler S. 2019. Homeorhesis and ecological succession quantified in synthetic microbial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:14852–14861. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1901055116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Berg M, Zhou XY, Shapira M. 2016. Host-specific functional significance of Caenorhabditis gut commensals. Front Microbiol 7:1622. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang J, Thingholm LB, Skiecevičienė J, Rausch P, Kummen M, Hov JR, Degenhardt F, Heinsen F-A, Rühlemann MC, Szymczak S, Holm K, Esko T, Sun J, Pricop-Jeckstadt M, Al-Dury S, Bohov P, Bethune J, Sommer F, Ellinghaus D, Berge RK, Hübenthal M, Koch M, Schwarz K, Rimbach G, Hübbe P, Pan W-H, Sheibani-Tezerji R, Häsler R, Rosenstiel P, D'Amato M, Cloppenborg-Schmidt K, Künzel S, Laudes M, Marschall H-U, Lieb W, Nöthlings U, Karlsen TH, Baines JF, Franke A. 2016. Genome-wide association analysis identifies variation in vitamin D receptor and other host factors influencing the gut microbiota. Nat Genet 48:1396–1406. doi: 10.1038/ng.3695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kurilshikov A, Wijmenga C, Fu J, Zhernakova A. 2017. Host genetics and gut microbiome: challenges and perspectives. Trends Immunol 38:633–647. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rothschild D, Weissbrod O, Barkan E, Kurilshikov A, Korem T, Zeevi D, Costea PI, Godneva A, Kalka IN, Bar N, Shilo S, Lador D, Vila AV, Zmora N, Pevsner-Fischer M, Israeli D, Kosower N, Malka G, Wolf BC, Avnit-Sagi T, Lotan-Pompan M, Weinberger A, Halpern Z, Carmi S, Fu J, Wijmenga C, Zhernakova A, Elinav E, Segal E. 2018. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature 555:210–215. doi: 10.1038/nature25973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Patel MN, Knight CG, Karageorgi C, Leroi AM. 2002. Evolution of germ-line signals that regulate growth and aging in nematodes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:769–774. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012511099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rastogi S, Borgo B, Pazdernik N, Fox P, Mardis ER, Kohara Y, Havranek J, Schedl T. 2015. Caenorhabditis elegans glp-4 encodes a valyl aminoacyl tRNA synthetase. G3 (Bethesda) 5:2719–2728. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.021899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mizuno T, Hisamoto N, Terada T, Kondo T, Adachi M, Nishida E, Kim DH, Ausubel FM, Matsumoto K. 2004. The Caenorhabditis elegans MAPK phosphatase VHP-1 mediates a novel JNK-like signaling pathway in stress response. EMBO J 23:2226–2234. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nix P, Hisamoto N, Matsumoto K, Bastiani M. 2011. Axon regeneration requires coordinate activation of p38 and JNK MAPK pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:10738–10743. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104830108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Warnhoff K, Murphy JT, Kumar S, Schneider DL, Peterson M, Hsu S, Guthrie J, Robertson JD, Kornfeld K. 2014. The DAF-16 FOXO transcription factor regulates natc-1 to modulate stress resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans, linking insulin/IGF-1 signaling to protein N-terminal acetylation. PLoS Genet 10:e1004703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Massie MR, Lapoczka EM, Boggs KD, Stine KE, White GE. 2003. Exposure to the metabolic inhibitor sodium azide induces stress protein expression and thermotolerance in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Stress Chaperones 8:1–7. doi:. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Singh V, Aballay A. 2006. Heat-shock transcription factor (HSF)-1 pathway required for Caenorhabditis elegans immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:13092–13097. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604050103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Garsin DA, Villanueva JM, Begun J, Kim DH, Sifri CD, Calderwood SB, Ruvkun G, Ausubel FM. 2003. Long-lived C. elegans daf-2 mutants are resistant to bacterial pathogens. Science 300:1921. doi: 10.1126/science.1080147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Portal-Celhay C, Blaser MJ. 2012. Competition and resilience between founder and introduced bacteria in the Caenorhabditis elegans gut. Infect Immun 80:1288–1299. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05522-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.TeKippe M, Aballay A. 2010. C. elegans germline-deficient mutants respond to pathogen infection using shared and distinct mechanisms. PLoS One 5:e11777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shivers RP, Kooistra T, Chu SW, Pagano DJ, Kim DH. 2009. Tissue-specific activities of an immune signaling module regulate physiological responses to pathogenic and nutritional bacteria in C. elegans. Cell Host Microbe 6:321–330. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.You Y, Kim J, Raizen DM, Avery L. 2008. Insulin, cGMP, and TGF-β signals regulate food intake and quiescence in C. elegans: a model for satiety. Cell Metab 7:249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chan JP, Wright JR, Wong HT, Ardasheva A, Brumbaugh J, McLimans C, Lamendella R. 2019. Using bacterial transcriptomics to investigate targets of host-bacterial interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci Rep 9:5545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41452-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ortiz A, Vega NM, Ratzke C, Gore J. 2021. Interspecies bacterial competition regulates community assembly in the C. elegans intestine. ISME J. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00910-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Baxi K, Ghavidel A, Waddell B, Harkness TA, de Carvalho CE. 2017. Regulation of lysosomal function by the DAF-16 Forkhead transcription factor couples reproduction to aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 207:83–101. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.204222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Houthoofd K, Braeckman BP, Lenaerts I, Brys K, De Vreese A, Van Eygen S, Vanfleteren JR. 2002. Axenic growth up-regulates mass-specific metabolic rate, stress resistance, and extends life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp Gerontol 37:1371–1378. doi: 10.1016/s0531-5565(02)00173-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Stiernagle T. 2006. Maintenance of C. elegans. WormBook 2006:1–11. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.101.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. 2019. vegan: community ecology package.
  • 63.Husson F, Josse J, Le S, Mazet J. 2020. FactoMineR: multivariate exploratory data analysis and data mining.
  • 64.Tvedebrink T. 2013. dirmult: estimation in Dirichlet-multinomial distribution.
  • 65.Harrell FE, Jr. 2020. Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1

Colony morphologies of the MYb bacterial isolates used in this study. All plating and CFU counting used salt-free modified nutrient agar (NA) to maximize differences between colony phenotypes. Bottom panels show plates resulting from mechanical disruption of two individual N2 worms, after 4 days of colonization with the standard eight-species metacommunity (see Materials and Methods). MYb56 shows two distinct morphologies on plates, as seen in the bottom panel. Colony counts of MYb56 were typically obtained by counting the number of branching centers on plates after 48 h of growth, to better distinguish the origins of individual colonies. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 0.8 MB (848.4KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DATA SET S1

Community composition data sets. Download Data Set S1, XLSX file, 0.1 MB (108.5KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Total colonization intensity in N2 worms colonized with an eight-species bacterial consortium (n = 164 individual worms). (A) Individual worms in this plot are ordered by total intestinal population size (from low to high, 1,680 to 67,200 CFU/worm). (B) Running average of relative abundance data, calculated using a 10-worm moving window (average over all consecutive sets of 10 worms in the ordered data set in panel A). Note that relative frequency of MYb71 was somewhat higher, and frequencies of MYb45, -53, and -56 somewhat lower, in very heavily colonized worms than in lightly colonized worms, indicating a possible diversity-population size relationship in these communities (see Fig. 3 and Fig. S4). (C) Histogram of total CFU per worm in the N2 worm set. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.2 MB (224.8KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Mutant strains of C. elegans show differences in intestinal community composition when colonized under identical conditions. (A and B) Adult worms were grown to day 1 adults at 25°C, except the daf-2 strain, which was grown to adulthood at 16°C to prevent dauer formation. Data are the same as those shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2A to D. (A) Average relative abundance of eight bacterial species in gut communities of mechanical mutants and immune system mutants of C. elegans. AU37, n = 115; ctls40, n = 48; daf-16, n = 98; daf-2, n = 98; eat-14, n = 69; glp-4, n = 36; N2, n = 164; phm-2, n = 78; vhp-1; n = 84. (B) All-samples plot of the principal-component analysis (PCA) shown in Fig. 2 (n = 861). (C and D) Adult worms were grown to day 1 adults at 16°C or 25°C as indicated; the daf-2 mutant and the daf-2; daf-16 double mutant (CF1449) were grown to adulthood at 16°C to prevent dauer formation. All worms were colonized at 25°C according to standard protocols. (C) Average relative abundance of eight bacterial species in gut communities of worms grown to adulthood at 16°C or 25°C. N2 at 25°C, n = 164; N2 at 16°C, n = 38; daf-16 strain at 25°C, n = 98; daf-16 strain at 16°C, n = 43; daf-2 strain, n = 116; daf-2; daf-16 strain at 16°C, n = 35. (D) All-samples plot of the principal component analysis (PCA) of which Fig. 2E is a subset (n = 513). Download FIG S3, TIF file, 0.1 MB (144.3KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Colonization by native microbiome bacteria is associated with changes in daf-16 activity as measured by a fluorescent reporter assay. (A) The daf-16 reporter shows activity relative to a nonfluorescent baseline (N2; Wilcoxon rank sum P values both <1e−9, Holm corrected). When the reporter strain is colonized on a metacommunity of seven bacterial species from the native worm microbiome (MYb27, -45, -53, -71, -120, -181, and -238), there is a nonsignificant trend in increased activity over the first few days of colonization in liquid culture (median log-transformed GFP day 1 = 1.49, day 3 = 1.39; Wilcoxon P value = 0.088, Holm corrected). (B) Induction of the daf-16 reporter after one day (24 h) of colonization on individual bacteria and the mixed metacommunity of all seven bacteria (Kruskal-Wallis test for differences between groups; chi-squared = 20.465, df = 9, P value = 0.01525). (C) Induction of the daf-16 reporter after three days of colonization on individual bacteria and the mixed metacommunity of all seven bacteria (Kruskal-Wallis test for differences between groups; chi-squared = 45.869, df = 8, P value = 2.518e−07). Download FIG S4, TIF file, 0.07 MB (70.7KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1

Diversity-size relationships, linear fits, and likelihood-ratio testing. (A) Linear model fits to single host strain data. Note that several of these fits are not significantly different from the fit of a horizontal line (m = 0), indicating no relationship between Shannon diversity and total microbiome size. SSE, sum of squared errors. (B) Linear model fits to data from each host strain pooled with N2 data, where the non-N2 strain is indicated as host 2. (C) Likelihood-ratio testing, where H0 (no difference between host lineages) is represented by the fit to pooled data and H1 (mutant host lineages show diversity-microbiome size relationships different from those of N2) is represented by the fits to single host strain data Table S1, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (12.1KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S5

Community composition data corresponding to Fig. 3. Data for day 2 (A, D, and G), day 4 (B, E, and H), and day 6 (C, F, and I) correspond to Fig. 3D to F. (J) Comparisons of total CFU per worm across host strains. Differences between groups were tested using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Asterisks represent significance levels after Bonferroni correction: ***, P < 0.0001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05. Download FIG S5, TIF file, 0.2 MB (174.7KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S6

Spearman correlation coefficients and histograms. (A to F) Correlation coefficients from real data. (A and B) N2 (n = 164), (C and D) daf-16 mutant (n = 100), and (E and F) daf-2 mutant (n = 98) intestinal communities. (G to J) Correlation coefficients from simulated N2 data, demonstrating that negative correlations in the Dirichlet-multinomial (DMN) simulations are spurious and due to small-number effects. Spearman correlation coefficients simulated from the Dirichlet-multinomial distribution, as fitted to N2 data, for one example simulation each with (G and H) 164 or (I and J) 16,400 worms. Download FIG S6, TIF file, 0.3 MB (311.9KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S7

Fitting the worm microbiome with the Dirichlet-multinomial distribution. Here, we show (A) the N2 community data used to fit the model and (B) one example simulated data set drawn from the resulting distribution, both with 164 individual hosts. Download FIG S7, TIF file, 2.0 MB (2MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S8

Intestinal bacterial communities in different host lineages react differently to a shared perturbation, and run-to-run variation is different across host lineages. In these experiments, adult worms were colonized with an even metacommunity of seven bacterial species (MYb27, -45, -53, -71, -120, -181, and -238 [All-7]) or a metacommunity where each species in turn is dropped (shown with the letter “d”) to 10% relative abundance. Data represent three (N2 and daf-2 hosts) independent runs, 12 individual worms per host lineage/metacommunity combination; individual worms with <100 CFU (daf-2 mutant) or <1,000 CFU (N2) were removed from data to minimize errors due to low plate counts. Individual replicates are indicated in the figure legends. Download FIG S8, TIF file, 0.10 MB (100.9KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Taylor and Vega.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Reviewer comments

Articles from mSystems are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES