Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Nov 2;11:21467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00645-4

Photoplethysmography for demarcation of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Simon Mylius Rasmussen 1,, Thomas Nielsen 2, Sofie Hody 3, Henrik Hager 4,5, Lars Peter Schousboe 1,5
PMCID: PMC8563950  PMID: 34728637

Abstract

A video processing algorithm designed to identify cancer suspicious skin areas is presented here. It is based on video recordings of squamous cell carcinoma in the skin. Squamous cell carcinoma is a common malignancy, normally treated by surgical removal. The surgeon should always balance sufficient tissue removal against unnecessary mutilation, and therefore methods for distinction of cancer boundaries are wanted. Squamous cell carcinoma has angiogenesis and increased blood supply. Remote photoplethysmography is an evolving technique for analysis of signal variations in video recordings in order to extract vital signs such as pulsation. We hypothesize that the remote photoplethysmography signal inside the area of a squamous cell carcinoma is significantly different from the surrounding healthy skin. Based on high speed video recordings of 13 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, we have examined temporal signal differences in cancer areas versus healthy skin areas. A significant difference in temporal signal changes between cancer areas and healthy areas was found. Our video processing algorithm showed promising results encouraging further investigation to clarify how detailed distinctions can be made.

Subject terms: Cancer, Surgical oncology, Biomedical engineering

Introduction

Squamous cell carcinoma and surgical challenges

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the predominant1 type of head and neck cancer, and the second most common form of cutaneous malignancy2. Surgical excision is the main treatment modality for SCC. Histology is performed to confirm the diagnosis, and complete removal is secured by particular examination of the resection margins2. If the cancer extends to the excision margins, there is risk of remaining cancer cells in the body, and such cancer positive margins are related to increased risk of locoregional recurrence3. The surgeon has to balance the need for complete removal of the skin cancer against the conservation of surrounding healthy tissue. The invasion of SCC into adjacent tissue can be a particular problem in the eyes, nose and ear regions2 where precise but still minimally-invasive surgery is needed.

The complete resection of SCC relies on palpation and visual inspection4. To ensure safety margins of the tissue removed, histological examination is performed2. Positive resection margins are at high risk for developing recurrent disease and are associated with poor prognosis in other head and neck cancers47.

Particularly in the head and neck region, the smallest possible excision margin is sought to avoid unneccesary mutilation of the skin and mucosa.

Increased blood supply through angiogenesis is a well known cancer characteristic8,9. Vascular endothelial growth factor is often expressed in malignant tumours and promotes angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, and it is associated with poor prognosis in different cancer types including head and neck SCC1012. The resulting tumour vasculature is structurally and functionally abnormal13, and the perfusion highly heterogeneous14.

Noninvasive imaging techniques such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI evaluate tumour vasculature with the aim of predicting treatment response15 and monitoring treatment effects16. The obtained imaging parameters correlate with histological measures15.

Angiogenesis is also known and studied in SCC17, where it was found to have a different vascularity than other non-SCC lesions, such as basal cell carcinoma and melanoma1820. An intra-operative imaging tool could help the surgeon visualize and guide the excision of the tumour with better margin control in real time4. At the moment, near-infrared fluorescent light is a technique employed to help ensure negative resection margins4. Drawbacks include the need for frequent probe repositioning and the high price of the system, which requires a reusable console21.

Remote photoplethysmography

Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) is a technique of contactless monitoring of human cardiac activities by detecting the pulse-induced subtle light signal variations on human skin surface using a multiwavelength RGB camera22. Photoplethysmography (PPG) first arose in the 1930’s, when Hertzman saw that the light reflected from the skin contained variations that could be captured with a photocell23. PPG has mainly been used in describing the signals from healthy individuals as well as developing algorithms for data extraction and analysis23. One recent study explored rPPG for localizing gastrointestinal SCC24. An rPPG system typically consists of a light source shining on the skin and an RGB camera sensor recording the reflected signal22. The green light channel is better for analysing blood flow as it contains the strongest PPG signal, based on the fact that haemoglobin absorbs green light better than red light and penetrates deeper into the skin than blue light25.

PPG has previously shown potential to be used in a camera-based intraoperative setting26, where data from the green channel could estimate the heart rate in 95.6% of cases. rPPG has been shown to be closely associated with cutaneous perfusion and sensitive to autonomic nervous activity27. A correlation of 0.91 has been shown between PPG and one of the main technologies for studying microcirculation, laser Doppler flowmetry, for endothelial activities28.

Hypothesis

The hypothesis of this study was that the rPPG signal inside the area of a SCC is significantly different from the neighbouring healthy skin.

Results

The results of the analysis are summarised in Table 1, see Methods section for details on calculating perfusion indexes. Perfusion indexes were calculated for different time periods of the same video recordings. The difference in perfusion indexes between biopsy and non-biopsy areas can be seen for different time periods.

Table 1.

Average perfusion indexes (normalized 0–1).

Period Confidence interval of difference P
Full time frame 0.016-0.038 <0.001
10 seconds 0.001-0.038 0.044
5 seconds −0.006-0.037 0.149
2 seconds −0.005-0.028 0.161

Significant differences were observed for the full time frame and for periods of 10 seconds comparing mean flow values in biopsy vs. non-biopsy areas. So perfusion indexes are significantly different in the cancer tissue vs. the healthy tissue in the full time frame and in periods of 10 seconds.

Discussion

Strengths

Our results are similar to other recent results documenting differences between cancer and non-cancer areas based on rPPG changes24. This study targeted SCC and aimed to investigate differences in rPPG signal variation between healthy skin and cancer areas. We have demonstrated that significant differences in rPPG signal variations can be measured and documented with video recordings.

Weaknesses

Light emitting diode (LED) surgery lighting was preferred, but in case of no LED, an alternative transportable LED lamp was used. This led to small noise levels in some recordings. The region of interest (ROI) selection was done freehand with reference to images showing the area by which the biopsy was taken and by excluding non-skin areas and frame edges.

The two dots used for image registration were set in far distance from the tumour but could in some cases be seen showing rPPG variation. This was dramatically decreased when low pass filtering the pixel signals, though very subtle movements caused persisting artifacts. The low pass filtration is in danger of removing relevant high frequency information, but this has not been demonstrated to be the case in our analysis.

Future studies

Differences in signal flow between cancer and healthy tissue were observed not only in the total signal length, but also in shorter time segments of 10 seconds. This indicates that significant differences can be found in short video recordings.

In theory, a device to do video signal processing and visually present margins with a delay of 10 seconds might be usable and be of value in clinical practice. It could be implemented as an examination tool for use before or during surgery.

Another goal could be to do the flow analysis to visualize margin detection during resection. It would be beneficial to study the spatial resolution of the flow algorithm, which we will investigate in future studies.

Methods

Data and setup

Our study was conducted at the Department of Otolaryngology and the Department of Plastic Surgery (South Danish University Hospital). It was authorized by the University of Southern Denmark and approved by the Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics and in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. We chose to focus on SCC of the skin because it is easily seen, and also since finding a pattern in the rPPG signal changes might be more difficult if data represents multiple pathologies. Patients referred to hospital under suspicision of SCC and patients with biopsy determined SCC were enrolled in the study. Twentyone adults gave written informed consent to participate. Eight patients were excluded because histology disconfirmed SCC. Patient nr. 10 appears twice since two SCC tumours were recorded from this patient. Clinically relevant information about the volunteers was logged. We recorded the skin tumour in two recordings of 60 s. Table 2 summarizes characteristics of the selected patient group.

Table 2.

Patient characteristics.

Nr Age Gender SCC location
1 82 Male Scalp
2 63 Female Upper arm
3 53 Female Lower leg
4 76 Male Scalp
5 64 Male Scalp
6 84 Male Finger
7 89 Male Back of hand
8 81 Male Temple
9 83 Female Foot
10 89 Female Hand
10 89 Female Neck
11 75 Male Lip
12 85 Male Ear
13 77 Female Scalp

For video recording we used a mobile recording system consisting of an RGB camera (UI-3160CP-C-HQ Rev2.1 sensor, iDS, Germany) and a zoom lens (Navitar Zoom 7000, Navitar, USA). Recordings were done in 12 bit, 460 × 960 pixels. One recording of 60 s was done at 60 frames per second (fps) and one recording of 60 s was done around 300 fps depending on the noise and gain level, which were prioritized to be minimal.

To provide a basis for later image registration, two dots were placed opposed of the tumour, see Fig. 1. After focus and lightsources were adjusted, an X-rite ColorChecker was included in the recording for later image preprocessing (Bayer conversion and white balancing for eliminating possible emission differences). For each recording, the pulse, shutter speed, and noise/gain levels were noted. Afterwards either the surgeon’s marking of the biopsy to be removed or the actual skin minus the excision was recorded. These recordings were later used to mark the excision margin in the two 60 s recordings. Light sources were always LED, either by the surgical light or by a mobile LED lamp if no other LED light source were available.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Example of masks. Blue line indicates the analysed skin area and the red line indicates the biopsy mask. The dots for image registration can be seen on both sides of the tumour.

Case selection

After surgery the removed tissue was evaluated by a pathologist as to whether the tumour was SCC. Eight patients without SCC were excluded leaving 14 to be analysed.

Video processing and registration

Data were recorded in a .seq format which was converted to uncompressed tiff-files. The tiff-files were white balanced and Bayer converted by using information from the frames containing the X-rite ColorChecker. The frames were combined to an uncompressed video format, .mj2. The video was then edited by removing the frames with the X-rite ColorChecker.

Based on the reasons given in the section on “Remote photoplethysmography”, processing and analysis were focused on data from the green colour channel. The remaining frames were registered by rigid body registration for the green colour channel using the Matlab rutines, imregconfig and imregister (MATLAB. (2020). version 9.8.0.1396136 (R2020a). Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks, Inc.).

Flow analysis

Videos recorded at 60 fps were selected. 60 fps was considered efficient since signals would later be low pass filtered at 20 Hz. For each video the area of the video was drawn as a mask, see Fig. 1 as example. Due to registration, the edges were cut away (see Fig.  2) and non-skin areas were also not selected. Secondly the resection margin was drawn in the video as a mask.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Removal of edges by area mask.

The green colour channel was then selected from the registered video, see Fig.  3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The green colour data were extracted from each frame of the video.

Each frame was divided in segments of 2×2 pixels in which the mean exposure replaced each of the four pixel values, see Fig.  4. This was done in order to reduce data amount.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Each frame was divided in segments of 2×2 pixels in which the mean exposure replaced each of the four pixel values.

In order to remove noise and high frequency motions, the temporal variation of each pixel was low pass filtered with two methods. Initially by using a minimum-order filter with corner frequency of 20 Hz, a stopband attenuation of 60 dB and compensation of the delay introduced by the filter. 20 Hz was chosen to remove high frequency noise but still have plenty of frenquency band to frequencies of the cardiac cycle (1–2 Hz). Afterwards data were filtered with a moving average filter at size 5, which was chosen to effectively remove noise elements based on minimal movements during the recording. I.e., the variation in each pixel was analysed as independent signals. For a specific period (T) of time (t) and a given signal (S(t)), the ratio (perfusion index, SPI) between mean (SDC) and peak (SAC) was found for T, see Eq. (1) and see Fig.  5.

SPI=SACSDC 1

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Illustration of the calculation of perfusion index for each single pixel in the video—in this example the period is the full time frame. Notice the marking of SAC and SDC.

Analysis of each signal was done in the full time frame, of segments of 10 s, of segments of 5 s and of segments of 2 s, see Fig.  6. When doing segmental analysis, the mean across the segments were calculated, see Fig.  6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Illustration of the segmental analysis, in this example dividing the video into 3 segments. Each segment is analysed individually and a mean value, nT, calculated in the end. Notice the individual markings of SAC and SDC for each segment.

Figures 5 and 6 illustrate that the n value calculated over the full time frame and the nT value calculated as a mean of segments will not necessarily be the same. In the example the nT value will be smaller than n.

The image matrix consisting of a perfusion index value for each pixel signal was then normalized by converting the matrix to an intensity image containing values in the range 0–1. The normalized image was plotted in a new diagram according to the individual pixel positions. In the segmental analysis the normalization was performed for each period.

The result is a flow chart as depicted in Fig.  7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Example of flow chart. Resection mask is shown with red dashed line.

The resulting flow charts were masked with the biopsy mask, and the average flow inside the mask was calculated. As an example see Fig. 7 for the areas of resection in the flow chart.

Likewise the average flow was calculated inside the mask defining the useful area, excluding the biopsy mask.

Statistics

For each time period (full time frame, 10 s, 5 s and 2 s) a paired t-test was used to check for difference in means of perfusion index between indexes inside the biopsy masks and indexes outside the biopsy masks. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical approval

Our study was approved by the Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics and in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Center Lillebaelt, University of Southern Denmark, Hans Skouby Fond, Overlæge Jørgen Werner Schous og hustru, Else-Marie Schou, født Wonge’s fond, Harboefonden, Eva & Henry Frænkels Mindefond, Thora og Viggo Groves mindefond, Dansk Kræftforskningsfond and Knud og Edith Eriksens Mindefond.

Author contributions

S.M.R., T.N. and L.P.S. conceived experiments. S.M.R., S.H. and H.H. conducted experiments. S.M.R., T.N. and L.P.S. analysed the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competinginterests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained errors in Table 1 and in the Results and Discussion section. Modifications have been made to Table 1 and the Results and Discussion section. Full information regarding the corrections made can be found in the correction for this Article.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

2/25/2022

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41598-022-06856-7

References

  • 1.Ovesen T, von Buchwald C. Lærebog i Øre-næse-Hals-Sygdomme og Hoved-Hals-Kirurgi. København: Munksgaard; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dyalram D, Caldroney S, Heath J. Margin analysis: Cutaneous malignancy of the head and neck. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2017;29:341–353. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sim FW, Xiao HD, Bell RB. Margin analysis: Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2017;29:269–280. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2017.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Iqbal H, Pan Q. Image guided surgery in the management of head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2016;57:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roxbury CR, et al. Erratum to: Endonasal endoscopic surgery in the management of sinonasal and anterior skull base malignancies. Head Neck Pathol. 2017;11:268. doi: 10.1007/s12105-017-0816-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hahn CH, Stangerup SE, Caye-Thomasen P. Residual tumour after vestibular schwannoma surgery. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2013;127:568–573. doi: 10.1017/S0022215113000844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Muller-Richter UDA, Gesierich A, Kubler AC, Hartmann S, Brands RC. Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Recommendations for diagnostics and treatment. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2017;20:20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5993-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Folkman J. The vascularization of tumors. Sci. Am. 1976;234:58–64. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0576-58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hanahan D, Folkman J. Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell. 1996;86:353–364. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80108-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gasparini G. Clinical significance of determination of surrogate markers of angiogenesis in breast cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2001;37:97–114. doi: 10.1016/S1040-8428(00)00105-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Borre M, Nerstrøm B, Overgaard J. Association between immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF-expressing neuroendocrine-differentiated tumor cells, and outcome in prostate cancer patients subjected to watchful waiting. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000;6:1882–1890. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Misawa Y, et al. Evaluation of epigenetic inactivation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2017;39:1010428317711657. doi: 10.1177/1010428317711657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vaupel P, Kallinowski F, Okunieff P. Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: A review. Can. Res. 1989;49:6449–6465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gillies RJ, Schornack PA, Secomb TW, Raghunand N. Causes and effects of heterogeneous perfusion in tumors. Neoplasia. 1999;1:197–207. doi: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zahra MA, Hollingsworth KG, Sala E, Lomas DJ, Tan LT. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of tumour response to radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:63–74. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)71012-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.O’Connor JP, Jackson A, Parker GJ, Jayson GC. DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents. Br. J. Cancer. 2007;96:189–195. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Florence ME, et al. Angiogenesis in the progression of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: An immunohistochemical study of endothelial markers. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011;66:465–468. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322011000300018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chin CW, Foss AJ, Stevens A, Lowe J. Differences in the vascular patterns of basal and squamous cell skin carcinomas explain their differences in clinical behaviour. J. Pathol. 2003;200:308–313. doi: 10.1002/path.1363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pastushenko I, et al. Squamous cell carcinomas of the skin explore angiogenesis-independent mechanisms of tumour vascularization. J. Skin Cancer. 2014;2014:651501. doi: 10.1155/2014/651501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Argenziano G, et al. Vascular structures in skin tumors: A dermoscopy study. Arch. Dermatol. 2004;140:1485–1489. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.12.1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu YF, et al. Noninvasive free flap monitoring using Eulerian video magnification. Case Rep. Otolaryngol. 2016;2016:9471696. doi: 10.1155/2016/9471696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang W, den Brinker AC, Stuijk S, de Haan G. Algorithmic principles of remote PPG. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2017;64:1479–1491. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2609282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Antink CH, Lyra S, Paul M, Yu X, Leonhardt S. A broader look: Camera-based vital sign estimation across the spectrum. Yearb. Med. Inform. 2019;28:102–114. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fouladi SH, Balasingham I, Kansanen K, Ramstad TA. Extracting remote photoplethysmogram signal from endoscopy videos for vessel and capillary density recognition. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2016;2016:227–230. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7590681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kossack B, Wisotzky EL, Hilsmann A, Eisert P. Local remote photoplethysmography signal analysis for application in presentation attack detection. In: Schulz H-J, Teschner M, Wimmer M, editors. Vision, Modeling and Visualization. The Eurographics Association; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Trumpp A, et al. Camera-based photoplethysmography in an intraoperative setting. Biomed. Eng. Online. 2018;17:33. doi: 10.1186/s12938-018-0467-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rasche S, et al. Association of remote imaging photoplethysmography and cutaneous perfusion in volunteers. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:16464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73531-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mizeva I, Di Maria C, Frick P, Podtaev S, Allen J. Quantifying the correlation between photoplethysmography and laser Doppler flowmetry microvascular low-frequency oscillations. J. Biomed. Opt. 2015;20:037007. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.3.037007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES