Abstract
Cervical cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. It usually spreads via direct invasion and lymphatics. Few cases with superficial spread to the uterine endometrium, fallopian tubes, and ovaries have been observed. The staging of these cases, as well as management, is not yet clear due to limited data. The Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging disregards uterine spread to upstage the disease, and it also fails to provide clear guidelines regarding the superficial extension to the ovaries and tubes which is not uncommon in these cases. A 63-year-old female with postmenopausal bleeding was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma on a pap smear. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a predominant endometrial lesion. Histopathology after Wertheim's hysterectomy revealed a squamous cell carcinoma of the endocervix, stage 1B2, that had spread superficially to the endometrium. A total of 48 cases of cervical cancer with superficial spread were identified. The commonest complaint was postmenopausal bleed in 39.39%. In 50% of the cases, the disease was carcinoma in situ, and 70.45% of the women had disease of stage 1B or less. In many cases, the disease had reached the tubes, 36.66%, and ovaries 23.33%. All women with stage 2A or lesser disease except for one were alive at 6 months after surgery. Superficial spread of cervical cancer is a distinct entity. Endometrial pathology must be ruled out before planning management in these women, especially when managing early-stage disease with conservative therapy.
Keywords: Cervical cancer, endometrial extension, gynecologic oncology, oncology, superficial spread
Introduction
Cervical cancer is one of the prime causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in Indian women.[1] The primary routes of spread are by direct extension to the surrounding structures and lymphatic invasion. Superficial spread to the endometrium is very rare with few cases reported in the literature. Historically, Cullen gave the first description in the year 1900, of a 65-year-old patient that had a squamous cell carcinoma that had an extension into the vagina and invaded into the lower uterine body but demonstrated a superficial spread to the rest of the endometrium forming multiple cell layers.[2]
The revised 2018 Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification[3] focuses on the size of the tumor and the depth of stromal invasion. FIGO stage I clearly defines it as cancer strictly confined to the cervix and extension to the uterine corpus is disregarded. It further sub-classifies stage I based on the depth of invasion and tumor size in the cervix. The staging disregards the presence of cancer in the endometrium, fallopian tubes, and superficial spread to the ovaries. However, it is not uncommon for a superficial spreading of cervical cancer to reach these areas. It is undetermined if this kind of superficial spread changes the stage, management, and prognosis. The literature on this entity is limited. The primary care physician may be the first point of contact for women with cancer cervix. Hence, they need to be aware of this condition. We present a case of squamous cell cancer of the cervix that had extensive superficial endometrial spread with a review of available literature.
Case Description
After due patient consent and approval from the institutional ethical committee, we present the following report:
A 63-year-old old woman, menopausal since 20 years presented at the Gynecology OPD at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, with a chief complaint of discharge per vaginum since 6 months. Per speculum examination revealed a cervix flushed with vagina and friable tissue at the external os. There was a 2.5 cm × 2 cm firm mass in the posterior fornix confirmed on per rectal examination. Bilateral parametria and rectal mucosa were free from tumor. Pap smear and biopsy revealed a squamous cell carcinoma. Ultrasound reported a uterus of size 6.8 × 3.2 cm. The endometrial cavity was distended with echogenic content and minimal fluid. Both ovaries were normal suggesting a diagnosis of “asymmetrical hetero echoic thickening of the endometrium with collection in the endometrial cavity, suspected carcinoma endometrium.” Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abdomen and pelvis [Figure 1] revealed a fluid-filled endometrial cavity, an irregular, circumferentially thick, intermediate to high signal intensity endometrium surrounded by thin hypointense rim seen in the fundus, body, and lower uterine segment. The endo-myometrial junction was mildly obscured, and the visualized myometrium was normal in signal intensity. The lesion was seen extending into the cervical canal reaching just proximal to the external os, and the internal os was seen mildly widened by the lesion. A small nodule was noted in the stroma of the anterior cervical wall with signal characteristics similar to the endometrial lesion, and it was suggested to represent local spread. The uterine serosa, parametrium, mesorectal fascia, urinary bladder, and lymph nodes were not involved. Bilateral adnexa was reported normal.
Figure 1.

Image shows a mildly bulky uterus with fluid filled endometrial cavity. Endometrium is irregular and thickened intermediate to high signal intensity surrounded by thin hypointense rim
There was a “diagnostic dilemma” given findings of cervical malignancy on biopsy but predominant endometrial lesion on imaging studies.
A Type III Radical Hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed keeping a clinical diagnosis of carcinoma cervix stage 1B2 (revised FIGO staging). On the gross cut section, the entire endometrium was filled with friable tissue admixed with gelatinous mucoid material. A small friable mass was seen in the endocervical canal [Figure 2]. Histopathology revealed a squamous cell carcinoma, nonkeratinizing, moderately differentiated, grade 2, depth of invasion 16 mm, closest resected margins uninvolved, all lymph nodes were negative, parametrium and paracervical tissue uninvolved, and the tumor had spread superficially to the endometrium. Bilaterally, the tubes and ovaries were uninvolved. Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA was positive for serotype 16. At follow-up, the patient was alive at 6 months after surgery.
Figure 2.

The bulky uterus is filled with heterogeneous pale pink gelatinous material (green arrow). The endo-myometrial distinction appears preserved (blue arrow). The pink friable mass continues into the cervix almost reaching upto the external os (black arrow)
Review and Discussion
Search methodology
We performed a PubMed, ResearchGate, Google search using the mesh terms, “cervical and carcinoma and superficial and/cephalad and/and endometrial/ium, uterine and spread/extension. We searched all articles and cross-searched the references in these articles as of 14 June 2021. The mesh terms were used in different combinations, and the maximum number of results retrieved were 69 articles for a single search. The results from each search were analyzed by two independent researchers, and the articles where abstract or title was not related to the superficial spread of cervical cancer were primarily excluded. After removing duplicates, 32 articles remained. Of these, we could not retrieve 4 articles as they were too old and unable to access. The final analysis included 28 articles with 48 cases that reported superficial spreading cervical cancer lesions involving the endometrium, fallopian tube, and rarely the ovaries. These were included in our review. In most of these cases, the entire endometrium was found to be replaced by squamous cell cancer with primary in the cervix. Out of all these cases, eight cases were from India.
Findings: [Table 1]
Table 1.
Demographic profile, clinical findings, histopathology, surgery and staging
| Number | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | n=37 | |
| 35-45 | 3 | 8.11 |
| 46-55 | 11 | 29.73 |
| 56-65 | 10 | 27.03 |
| 65-75 | 12 | 32.43 |
| 75 | 1 | 2.70 |
| Clinical profile | n=33 (one women may have more than one complaint) | |
| Post-menopausal bleed | 13 | 39.39 |
| Lump in abdomen or distension | 7 | 21.21 |
| Pain | 7 | 21.21 |
| Vaginal discharge | 4 | 12.12 |
| Routine pap | 7 | 21.21 |
| Referred | 1 | 3.03 |
| Vaginal bleed | 1 | 3.03 |
| Urinary complaints | 1 | 3.03 |
| Histological subtype | n=45 | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 41 | 91.11 |
| Adenoid | 1 | 2.22 |
| Adenocarcinoma | 1 | 2.22 |
| Adenosquamous | 1 | 2.22 |
| Verrucous | 1 | 2.22 |
| Stage | n=44 | |
| CIS | 23 | 50.00 |
| 1a | 1 | 2.27 |
| 1b | 8 | 18.18 |
| 2a | 3 | 6.82 |
| 2b | 5 | 11.36 |
| Invasive | 5 | 9.09 |
| HSIL† | 1 | 2.27 |
| Involvement of tubes | n=30 | |
| Involved | 11 | 44.44 |
| Not involved | 20 | 55.60 |
| Ovarian involvement | n=30 | |
| Involved | 7 | 25.93 |
| Not involved | 23 | 70.37 |
| Surgery | n=37 | |
| TAH‡ | 2 | 5.41 |
| TAH BSO§ | 6 | 16.22 |
| Conization than TAH BSO | 4 | 10.81 |
| Conization than Wertheim’s after 16 years | 1 | 2.7 |
| Radical Vaginal hysterectomy | 1 | 2.7 |
| Emergency subtotal hysterectomy | 1 | 2.7 |
| Wertheim’s | 21 | 56.76 |
| Wertheim’s with vulvectomy | 1 | 2.7 |
*CIS=carcinoma in situ, †HSIL=High grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, ‡TAH=total abdominal hysterectomy, §TAH BSO=Total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo oophorectomy
Age profile
The age of these women varied from 38 years to 78 years [Table 1]. Most of the women were 46 to 65 years (89.19%) including our case. The youngest reported woman, 38 years, was also positive for HIV, hepatitis B, and C.[4]
Clinical profile
The commonest symptom was postmenopausal bleed (39.39%) followed by a lump in the abdomen or distension of the abdomen (21.21%). The pain was the presenting feature in 21.21% and vaginal discharge in 12.12% of the women. Routine Papanicolaou (pap) smear was an aid in diagnosis with 21.21% of the women identified during screening. Pelvic examination findings were reported in 26 cases (54.16%), and 6 of these (23.08%) women had a normal-looking cervix[5,6,7,8,9,10] where the diagnosis was made on a pap smear. Another 4 (15.38%) had cervical stenosis (one case had stenosis post conization performed 16 years ago).[11,12,13,14,9,10] The cervix was firm flushed with vagina in 3 (11.54%) cases,[13,15,16] and a visible cervical mass was reported in 11 (42.31%) women.[4,12,13,17,18,19,20,21]
Histological subtype and extent
Of the 39 cases for whom a histological subtype was available, the commonest was squamous cell carcinoma reported in 41 (91.11%) cases, adenocarcinoma with an intestinal and mucinous component in one,[7] squamous cell carcinoma with adenoid variant 12 in one, one adenosquamous variety 22, and one case of verrucous carcinoma 23 [Table 1]. Our case was a squamous cell carcinoma.
An interesting finding was that maximum women had carcinoma in situ (50%: 22 of 44) and one had a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (2.27%) that had spread superficially. Total 70.45% of the women had disease of stage 1B or less. Thus, despite a lower stage in the cervix, the tumor extended cephalad, indicating an inherent propensity for cephalad extension rather than infiltration as is the usual case. Our case was stage 1B, reported in 18.18% of the cases.
Vagina was involved in 11 (22.91%: 11 of 48) cases,[2,12,13,17,19,22,23] one woman (2.08%: 1 of 48) had involvement of vagina and vulva,[24] and one had an endometrial sarcoma in addition to vaginal and vulval involvement (2.08%).[25] Nakao et al.[22] reported a rare case of adenosquamous cervical cancer with paradoxical extension. The squamous component extensively invaded the superficial endometrium and replaced the glandular tissue, whereas the glandular component extended to the vagina replacing the squamous tissue. Out of the 30 cases with available information, the malignancy had reached one or both of the fallopian tubes in 11 cases (36.66%) and one or both ovaries in 7 cases (23.33%).
Adler et al.[20] also reported unusual MRI findings in one patient. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MRI revealed a focally thickened endometrium as the major finding, whereas the cervical mass was best seen as an early enhancing lesion visible only on dynamic imaging and was more likely to be missed if dynamic imaging was not used. The full extent of the tumor was not radiologically evident and deep invasion of the cervix and myometrium was not appreciated on imaging precluding accurate diagnosis. A similar finding in our case where the endometrial lesion was the dominant finding creating an illusion of endometrial malignancy.
Choice of surgery
Wertheim's hysterectomy was performed in 56.76% of the women [Table 1]. A radical vaginal hysterectomy was done in one woman with stage 1B carcinoma, and the patient was alive and well at 3 years.[12] One woman needed a subtotal emergency hysterectomy as she had pyometra and later went into septic shock.[21] A Wertheim's hysterectomy type III was done in our case.
Mechanism of spread and origin
Cervical stenosis was proposed to be a reason for endometrial rather than the lateral extension.[13,21] However, our analysis indicates that of the 25 cases with information about the cervical lesion, only 5 (20%) women had stenosis, hence this may not be the only reason for the superficial spread of the tumor.[11,12,13,14]
The mechanism of spread is proposed to be contiguous or trans tubal.[18] Two authors reported that the superficial spreading cells were strongly positive for CD138.[16,17] CD 138 or Syndecan 1 is a key cell surface adhesion molecule.[26] It is a cell surface heparin sulfate proteoglycan that is responsible for cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interaction. Expression of CD138 inversely correlates with tumor differentiation and prognosis. CD138 was found to decrease the invasiveness in oral malignancies by modulating the extracellular signalregulated kinase (ERK) cascade. It has been proposed that this may be one possible reason for the superficial spread of this tumor rather than infiltration due to retained CD138 expression in these cells.[17]
Another proposed mechanism is the transformation of endometrial cells to squamous rather than actual spread. P16 overexpression and HPV linkage have been proposed to be responsible for transforming the reserve cells in the endometrium misconceived as the superficial spread.[27] But in another study, Kushima et al.[24] studied the loss of heterozygosity markers in the endometrial cells in five women. The markers helped localize the cell of origin. The loci for 6p, 6q, 11p, and 11q were found to be positive in endometrial and cervical samples indicating a monoclonal origin of both the tumors supporting spread from cervix rather than endometrial cell transformation.
Survival: [Table 2]
Table 2.
Survival in relation to age, history, clinical findings, stage, and cervical stromal invasion, extension to tubes and ovaries, and surgery
| Study | Age (yrs) | History | Examination and investigations | Stage | Stromal invasion | Tubes and ovaries | Surgery | Survival |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tan[15] | 70 | Post-menopausal bleed Foul discharge | Firm flushed with vagina Pyometra present | 1B2 | Yes Micro | Not Involved | TAH BSO* | Alive at 6 months |
| Fadare[4] | 38 | Pain, discharge | Massively enlarged with ulcerations, HPV, HIV, Hep B, HCV positive | 1B2 | Yes | Not Involved | Wertheim’s | Alive at 9 months |
| Komanapalli[6] | 55 | Post-menopausal bleed and pain | Normal atrophic | CIS | No | Adnexa Not Removed As Diagnosis CIS† | Total Abdominal Hysterectomy | Alive at 9 months |
| Kanbour[12] 5 Cases | 66 | Referred | Tumor in cervix, pyometra | 2B | Yes | Right Tube | Wertheim’s, Lymph Nodes Positive | Died after 4 months |
| 58 | Post-menopausal bleed, pain, lump in abdomen | Cervical stenosis, hematometra | 2A | Yes | Not Involved | Wertheim’s | Alive at 11 years | |
| 53 | Post-menopausal bleed | Tumor in cervix | 2B | Yes | Not Involved | Wertheim’s | Died after 4½ years | |
| 61 | Routine pap | Cervical stenosis | 1B | Yes | Not Involved | Wertheim’s | Alive at 3 years | |
| 54 | Post-menopausal bleed | Tumor in cervix | 2B | Yes | Not Involved | Wertheim’s | Alive at 2 years | |
| Ishida[17] 2 Cases | 64 | Post-menopausal bleed | Tumor in cervix, vagina involved | 2A1 | Yes | Not Involved | Wertheim’s | Alive at 10 months |
| 59 | Post-menopausal bleed | Tumor in cervix | 2B | Yes | Not Involved | Wertheim’s | Alive at 6 months | |
| Chao[21] | 60 | Distension of abdomen | Distended cervix and uterus, pyometra | CIS | Yes | Both Tubes Involved | ESHFSS‡ | Died after 2 days |
| Deel[7] | 50 | Routine pap | Normal | 1B | Yes | Focal Right Tube | Leep Then Wertheim’s | Alive at 4 years |
| Ferenzycy[10] | 53 | Routine pap | Normal | CIS | No | Not available | Conization than TAH | Alive at 7 years |
| Gulati[19] | 57 | White discharge, pain in abdomen | Visible growth | 2A | Yes | Not available | Wertheim’s | Alive at 6 months |
| Karapoulau[9] | 69 | Routine pap | Normal | CIS | No | Not available | Conization than TAH BSO | Alive at 7 months |
| Nakajima[14] | 67 | Pain in abdomen | Stenosed | CIS | No | Yes, both tubes and ovaries | Conization than radical hysterectomy, omentectomy and transverse colon resection after 16 years. | Alive at 40 months |
| Salm[2] 2 cases | 70 | Routine pap | Not available | CIS | Yes | Not available | Wertheim’s | Died 15 years after surgery due to other causes. |
| 44 | Routine pap | Normal | CIS | No | Not available | TAH | Alive at 3 months |
*TAH BSO=Total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo oophorectomy, †CIS=Carcinoma in situ, ‡ESHFSS=Emergency Subtotal Hysterectomy For Septic Shock
Survival data were available for 18 cases [Table 2]. One had a tumor extending to both the tubes and died of septicemia secondary to pyometra.[21] One had a tumor extending to the right tubes, and she also had positive pelvic nodes. She died after 4 ½ months due to the disease.[12] In another woman with fallopian tube involvement, the diagnosis was made on routine pap, and she was alive 4 years after surgery.[7] Another patient with cervical stenosis and hematometra had a bilateral tube and ovary involvement and was alive at 40 months after radical surgery.[14] In one woman, the adnexa was not removed as she was operated on for an in situ cancer.[6] In the remaining 8 cases, the tumor did not spread to the tubes or ovaries, and the survival reported varied from 6 months to 11 years. The longest survival reported for CIS is 15 years after surgery and even then, the patient died of bronchopneumonia and cerebral arteriosclerosis with no evidence of clinical recurrence. However, this death was reported in the year 1968 and so considering the limited availability of diagnostic modalities and absence of necropsy, data on recurrence or metastasis is dubious. All women with stage 2A or lesser disease (n = 8) except for the one who died of septic shock, were alive at least 3 months after surgery. Deel et al.[7] postulate that in women with the localized cervical disease, the superficial spread to the endometrium and adnexa may not be associated with an inferior prognosis. Our patient was alive and well at 6 months after surgery. With an increasing number of cases being reported from countries like India, it is recommended that treating physicians remain more vigilant and exercise extra caution while managing these cases.
Wertheim's hysterectomy and survival
Both women with CIS in whom radical hysterectomy was done survived for at least 40 months and 15 years each. For stage 1B (three cases), the longest survival available after radical hysterectomy is alive at 4 years. One woman (1 of 3, 33.33%) with stage 2B disease died after 4.5 years. Radical hysterectomy does appear to prolong life. However, the choice of optimal surgery and if the surgery provides greater benefit to women diagnosed with the superficial spread at the first point of contact remains to be ascertained.
Conclusion
Superficial spread of cervical cancer towards the endometrium is a rare but cognizable phenomenon. This spread may occur irrespective of the stage of the disease in the cervix. Gross examination of the cervix may mislead us towards the extent of the lesion. Caution needs to be exercised when treating in situ cases with procedures like loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or conization as the lesion may have spread to the endometrium and thus alter the stage and choice of surgery. It is wise to evaluate the endometrium thoroughly in every case of cancer cervix to offer the best management modalities to the patient.
Key points
Vigilance is the key in managing cancer cervix.
Superficial involvement of the endometrium and tubes is possible.
If untreated, this superficial spread may lead to the recurrence of the tumor.
Need to sample the cervix before surgery in lesions that are found to be endometrial on imaging studies.
A careful evaluation and therapeutic strategy must be adopted for optimal disease-free outcomes.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, National Cancer Registry Programme, Indian Council of Medical Research. Three-Year Report of Population Based Cancer Registries 2012-2014 Published by the NCDIR-NCRP (ICMR). Incidence, Distribution, Trends in Incidence Rates and Projections of Burden of Cancer (Report of 27 pbcrs in India) Bengaluru, India: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Salm R. Superficial intra-uterine spread of intra-epithelial cervical carcinoma. J Pathol. 1969;97:719–23. doi: 10.1002/path.1710970418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Berek JS, Matsuo K, Grubbs BH, Gaffney DK, Lee SI, Kilcoyne A, et al. Multidisciplinary perspectives on newly revised 2018 FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30:e40. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fadare O. Dysplastic ichthyosis uteri-like changes of the entire endometrium associated with a squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Diagn Pathol. 2006;1:8. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-1-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chandrashekhara SH, Hari S, Arora R, Kaushal S, Singh MK, Dadhwal V. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of cervix showing horizontal endometrial spread with extension and involvement of the myometrium: A case report. Indian J Cancer. 2015;52:496–7. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.178405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Komanapalli SK, Ranjan S, Rao RM, Rao ES. Carcinoma in situ cervix extension into endometrium: An unusual case report. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2013;1:155–9. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Deel CD, Allen RA, Holman LL, Zuna RE. Adenocarcinoma of the cervix involving the fallopian tube mucosa: Report of a case. Diagn Pathol. 2016;11:77. doi: 10.1186/s13000-016-0529-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pins MR, Young RH, Crum CP, Leach IH, Scully RE. Cervical squamous cell carcinoma in situ with intraepithelial extension to the upper genital tract and invasion of tubes and ovaries: Report of a case with human papilloma virus analysis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1997;16:272–8. doi: 10.1097/00004347-199707000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Karopoulou E, Antoniadou F, Arapaki A, Strataki K, Polykalas S, Arnogiannaki N, et al. EP719 Cervical squamous cell carcinoma in situ with superficial intraepithelial extension to the endometrium: A rare case. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29:A407. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ferenczy A, Richart RM, Okagaki T. Endometrial involvement by cervical carcinoma in situ. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;110:590–2. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(71)90706-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Razquin S, Mayayo E, Antón E, Alvira R. Squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the endometrium as superficial extension of cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1993;35:190–2. doi: 10.1159/000292698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kanbour AI, Stock RJ. Squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the endometrium and fallopian tube as superficial extension of invasive cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 1978;42:570–80. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197808)42:2<570::aid-cncr2820420225>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Marwah N, Garg M, Singh S, Sethi D, Sen R. Unusual form of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix extending in situ into the endometrium: Three case reports and review of literature. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2012;2:139–41. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.106359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nakajima T, Hatta H, Nishida T, Minamisaka T, Miwa S, Terahata S, et al. Superficial spread of cervical squamous cell carcinoma to the upper genital tract and dissemination to the omentum. Pathol Int. 2019;69:2:119–21. doi: 10.1111/pin.12754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tan GC, Isa MR, Ng SP, Jamil YMA. Unusual form of superficial spreading microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix involving the endometrium of uterus. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004;30:363–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00210.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Muthusamy RK, Mehta SS. Squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the cervix with superficial intraepithelial extension to the endometrium of lower uterine segment: A rare presentation. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2017;38:88–9. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.203509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ishida M, Okabe H. Superficial spreading squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix involving the endometrium: Report of two cases with emphasis on the likely molecular mechanism. Oncol Lett. 2013;5:31–4. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gungor T, Altinkaya SO, Ozat M, Akbay S, Mollamahmutoglu L. Unusual form of superficial spreading squamous cell carcinoma of cervix involving the endometrium, bilateral tubes and ovaries: A case report with literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283:323–7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1672-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gulati HK, Anand M, Deshmukh SD. Squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix extending to the corpus in superficial spreading manner and causing hematometra. J Midlife Health. 2013;4:63–4. doi: 10.4103/0976-7800.109644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Adler F, Rabban JT, Yeh BM, Qayyum A, Chen L-M, Coakley FV. Superficial endometrial spread of squamous cell cervical carcinoma: A diagnostic challenge at magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:247–50. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000238006.19258.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chao A, Wang AMC, Wang T-H, Wu T-I, Chao A-S. An atypical and fatal case of pyometra accompanied by the superficial spread of squamous cell carcinoma of the endometrium and the fallopian tubes. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;52:440–2. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nakao Y, Yokoyama M, Hara K, Yasunaga M, Uchiyama M, Noguchi M, et al. Endometrial extension of adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14:625–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1048-891X.2004.14413.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tiltman AJ, Atad J. Verrucous carcinoma of the cervix with endometrial involvement. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1982;1:221–6. doi: 10.1097/00004347-198202000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kushima M, Fujii H, Murakami K, Ota H, Matsumoto T, Motoyama T, et al. Simultaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix and upper genital tract: Loss of heterozygosity analysis demonstrates clonal neoplasms of cervical origin. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2001;20:353–8. doi: 10.1097/00004347-200110000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Motoyama T, Watanabe H. Squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with extensive superficial spreading to almost whole genital tract and associated with endometrial stromal sarcoma. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1988;38:1445–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.1988.tb01086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang X, He J, Zhao X, Qi T, Zhang T, Kong C. Syndecan-1 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and migration in human oral cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2018;39:1835–42. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sood N, Sinha KS. Superficial spreading squamous cell carcinoma endometrium and icthyosis uteri with CINIII with p16 expression: Report of 2 unusual cases. JKIMSU. 2017;6:126–31. [Google Scholar]
