Abstract
BACKGROUND: We have been conducting a cohort study named “the Japan Collaborative Cohor Study (JACC Study) for Evaluation of Cancer Risk sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (Monbusho)” since 1988. The aim of this paper is to describe the mortality of our JACC cohort in the follow-up period from 1988 through 1999, to compare it with the mortality, especially cancer deaths, of the Japanese population in the same period and to compare the causes of mortality by district among the cohort.
METHODS: We conducted a follow-up study of 110,792 Japanese inhabitants aged 40-79 years in 1988-1990 for about 10 years to the end of 1999.
RESULTS: Of 46,465 males, 37,750 (81.2%) were alive, 7,238 (15.6%) were dead and 1,477 (3.2%) had moved out of the study areas. The figures were 57,016 (88.6%), 4,940 (7.7%) and 2,371 (3.7%) among 64,327 females, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 9.9 years. The proportion of cancer deaths by site in our cohort members was almost same as the Japanese population aged 40-79 years old in 1995. Sex-specific standardized mortality ratios of total deaths, all cancer deaths, and most cancers in our cohort were less than 100 in both males and females for total cohort and the cohort by district.
CONCLUSION: Our cohort members appeared to be almost the same or slightly healthier and less likely to die from total causes and cancers than the general population.
Key words: Japan Collaborative Cohort Study (JACC Study), Cancer, Mortality
A large-scale population based cohort study named “the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study (JACC Study) for Evaluation of Cancer Risk sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (Monbusho)”1 was initiated in 1988. The purpose of this study is to address the relationship between recent Japanese lifestyles and cancer. There were no other cohort studies in Japan at that time since Hirayama’s large-scale cohort study2 on cancer which was initiated in 1965 and terminated in 1982, even though the Japanese lifestyle, especially dietary habits, have dramatically changed since the end of the Second World War in 1945.3 Epidemiologic studies using questionnaires on smoking, drinking and diet are important. However, those using biological markers can provide much more informative evidence for cancer pathogenesis. Therefore, another purpose of the JACC Study is to investigate the relationship between biological markers and cancer risk.
This paper will aim to describe the mortality of our JACC cohort in the follow-up period from 1988 through 1999, to compare it with the mortality, especially cancer deaths, of the Japanese population in the same period and to compare the causes of mortality by district among the cohort.
METHODS
The JACC study was conducted in 45 areas from 19 prefectures throughout Japan; 3 towns in Hokkaido district, 5 towns in Tohoku district, 5 towns in Kanto district, one city, 3 towns and 2 villages in Chubu district, 8 towns and 2 villages Kinki district, one city and one town in Chugoku district, and 4 cities, 9 towns and one village in Kyushu district. A basic cohort population of 127,477 healthy inhabitants (54,032 males and 73,445 females) in the above areas responded to the baseline questionnaire in 1988-1990. Basic cohort members, including 46,465 men and 64,327 women (110,792 in total) aged 40-79 years at entry, were followed up for about 10 years to the end of 1999.
The follow-up survey was conducted using population registries in local municipalities to determine the vital and residential status of the cohort in each area. All the cases that moved out of the study areas were treated as censored cases. Five subjects who were expunged from their residence record by authorities were also treated as censored cases and included in cases that moved out for computing the cohort numbers by follow up status as of end of 1999. All deaths that occurred in the cohort were ascertained by death certificates from local public health centers in the study areas under the authorities’ permission from the Director-General of the Prime Minister’s Office (Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Post, and Telecommunications). The underlying causes of death were coded according to the International Classification of Diseases and Injuries (ICD) 10th version by verifying computer-stored data in the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare with the permission. Those already coded according to the ICD 9th version (from the time of the baseline survey through 1994) and stored in the computer data-base in the Ministry of Health and Welfare were re-coded in 1999 according to the ICD 10th version (after 1995), using a specifically developed computer program4 for converting the ICD 9th code to the 10th.
Follow-up condition (alive, dead, or moved) by sex and age group at entry as of the end of 1999 was computed. For those dead, causes of death, especially of cancer deaths, by sex and age group at entry as of the end of 1999 were also computed. Sex-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated using sex- and age-specific person-years of following-up and sex- and age-specific mortality rates for all Japan in 1988-1999.5 From a practical reason, the mortality rates in 1989 were used for the follow-up data in 1988-1990, and by the same manner, the rates in 1992, 1995, and 1998 were used for each three years of follow-up. Confidence intervals of SMR were calculated according to chi-square distribution when the observation number was 10 or larger,6 and according to Poisson distribution when less than 10.7
Our entire study design, which comprised singular and collective use of epidemiologic data and biological materials (serum only), was approved in 2000 by the Ethical Board at Nagoya University School of Medicine, where the central secretariat of the JACC study is located.
RESULTS
Table 1 shows the age distribution of the cohort members aged 40-79 years at the time of their enrolment in the study and their follow-up condition as of the end of 1999. Of 46,465 males, 37,750 (81.2%) were alive, 7,238 (15.6%) were dead, and 1,477 (3.2%) had moved out of the study areas. The figures were 57,016 (88.6%), 4,940 (7.7%), and 2,371 (3.7%) among 64,327 females, respectively. The mean follow-up period was about 10 years.
Table 1. Age distribution of cohort members at entry and deaths/move-outs as of the end of 1999.
Age at entry (year) | |||||||||
| |||||||||
40-44 | 45-49 | 50-54 | 55-59 | 60-64 | 65-69 | 70-74 | 75-79 | Total | |
Male | |||||||||
Total | 6,002 | 5,806 | 6,322 | 7,695 | 8,429 | 5,518 | 4,024 | 2,669 | 46,465 |
Alive | 5,518 | 5,331 | 5,689 | 6,725 | 6,917 | 4,079 | 2,334 | 1,157 | 37,750 |
(%) | 91.9 | 91.8 | 90.0 | 87.4 | 82.1 | 73.9 | 58.0 | 43.4 | 81.2 |
Dead | 147 | 219 | 441 | 785 | 1337 | 1306 | 1572 | 1431 | 7238 |
(%) | 2.5 | 3.8 | 7.0 | 10.2 | 15.9 | 23.7 | 39.1 | 53.6 | 15.6 |
Moved | 337 | 256 | 192 | 185 | 175 | 133 | 118 | 81 | 1477 |
(%) | 5.6 | 4.4 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
Female | |||||||||
Total | 7,557 | 7,926 | 9,108 | 10,816 | 11,114 | 8,602 | 5,557 | 3,647 | 64,327 |
Alive | 7,074 | 7,485 | 8,565 | 10,094 | 10,092 | 7,364 | 4,189 | 2,153 | 57,016 |
(%) | 93.6 | 94.4 | 94.0 | 93.3 | 90.8 | 85.6 | 75.4 | 59.0 | 88.6 |
Dead | 83 | 136 | 236 | 425 | 713 | 944 | 1099 | 1304 | 4940 |
(%) | 1.1 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 6.4 | 11.0 | 19.8 | 35.8 | 7.7 |
Moved | 400 | 305 | 307 | 297 | 309 | 294 | 269 | 190 | 2371 |
(%) | 5.3 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 3.7 |
Total cancer deaths accounted for 38.7% (2,798) and 35.0% (1,730) in male and female total deaths (7,238 and 4,940) as shown in Table 2. Among male cancer deaths, cancers of the lung (code of ICD 10th: C33, C34), stomach (C16), and liver (C22) were the three commonest sites, accounting for 23.0%, 20.8%, and 13.1%, respectively. In women, the three commonest sites were cancers of the stomach, lung, and liver, accounting for 16.6%, 11.8%, and 9.3%, respectively. The commonest were the stomach, large intestine (12.3%), and lung when the large intestine was defined by the cancer of colon and rectum (C18-20).
Table 2. Age distribution of total deaths, all cancer deaths, and site-specific cancer deaths as of the end of 1999.
Age at entry (year) | |||||||||
| |||||||||
40-44 | 45-49 | 50-54 | 55-59 | 60-64 | 65-69 | 70-74 | 75-79 | Total | |
Total deaths | 230 | 355 | 677 | 1,210 | 2,050 | 2,250 | 2,671 | 2,735 | 12,178 |
All cancer deaths | 95 | 154 | 323 | 578 | 1,008 | 850 | 845 | 675 | 4,528 |
% | 41.3 | 43.4 | 47.7 | 47.8 | 49.2 | 37.8 | 31.6 | 24.7 | 37.2 |
Male | |||||||||
Total deaths | 147 | 219 | 441 | 785 | 1,337 | 1,306 | 1,572 | 1,431 | 7,238 |
Cancer deaths | 50 | 88 | 194 | 365 | 677 | 515 | 509 | 400 | 2,798 |
% | 34.0 | 40.2 | 44.0 | 46.5 | 50.6 | 39.4 | 32.4 | 28.0 | 38.7 |
Lung(C33,C34) | 11 | 11 | 37 | 62 | 174 | 136 | 120 | 93 | 644 |
Stomach(C16) | 13 | 19 | 36 | 84 | 130 | 109 | 109 | 82 | 582 |
Liver(C22) | 5 | 12 | 42 | 62 | 104 | 52 | 56 | 33 | 366 |
Pancreas(C25) | 3 | 5 | 9 | 17 | 35 | 30 | 32 | 30 | 161 |
Colon(C18) | 4 | 5 | 15 | 14 | 32 | 23 | 27 | 24 | 144 |
Gall bladder/bile duct(C23,C24) | 1 | 4 | 5 | 23 | 32 | 34 | 21 | 20 | 140 |
Rectum(C19,C20) | 3 | 8 | 9 | 27 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 19 | 123 |
Esophagus(C15) | 4 | 5 | 12 | 19 | 29 | 18 | 14 | 7 | 108 |
Prostate(C61) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 20 | 33 | 32 | 103 |
Malignant lymphoma(C81-C85) | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 18 | 13 | 6 | 8 | 63 |
Mouth(C00-C14) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 17 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 49 |
Bladder(C67) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 39 |
Lalynx(C32) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Skin(C43,C44) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
Others | 5 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 59 | 46 | 54 | 34 | 261 |
Female | |||||||||
Total deaths | 83 | 136 | 236 | 425 | 713 | 944 | 1,099 | 1,304 | 4,940 |
Cancer deaths | 45 | 66 | 129 | 213 | 331 | 335 | 336 | 275 | 1,730 |
% | 54.2 | 48.5 | 54.7 | 50.1 | 46.4 | 35.5 | 30.6 | 21.1 | 35.0 |
Stomach(C16) | 7 | 10 | 14 | 43 | 51 | 58 | 56 | 48 | 287 |
Lung(C33,C34) | 6 | 3 | 15 | 24 | 44 | 40 | 43 | 30 | 205 |
Liver(C22) | 1 | 4 | 8 | 22 | 33 | 49 | 21 | 23 | 161 |
Pancreas(C25) | 1 | 5 | 10 | 17 | 35 | 29 | 34 | 25 | 156 |
Colon(C18) | 0 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 23 | 34 | 26 | 34 | 151 |
Gall bladder/bile duct(C23,C24) | 3 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 27 | 38 | 27 | 148 |
Breast(C50) | 9 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 4 | 94 |
Uterus(C53-C55) | 6 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 14 | 79 |
Rectum(C19,C20) | 2 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 7 | 62 |
Malignant lymphoma(C81-C85) | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 47 |
Ovary(C56) | 4 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 17 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 56 |
Esophagus(C15) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 23 |
Bladder(C67) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 21 |
Mouth(C00-C14) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 19 |
Skin(C43,C44) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Lalynx(C32) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Others | 5 | 5 | 12 | 23 | 41 | 44 | 47 | 34 | 211 |
in the parentheses: code of ICD 10th
Sex-specific SMRs of total deaths, all cancer deaths, and site-specific cancer deaths were shown in Table 3. Site-specific SMRs for a total cohort were less than 100 except for cancer of the gall bladder/bile duct (C23, C24) in males and pancreas (C25) and skin (C43, C44) in females. SMRs of total deaths and all cancer deaths by district were less than 100 in both males and females. Most of the SMRs by cancer site and district were less than 100 though some exceeded this.
Table 3. Sex-specific satandardized mortality raios (SMRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of total deaths, all cancer deaths, and site-specific cancers by district.
Hokkaido | Tohoku | Kanto | Chubu | Kinki | Chugoku | Kyushu | Total | |
SMR95%CI | SMR95%CI | SMR95%CI | SMR95%CI | SMR95%CI | SMR95%CI | SMR95%CI | SMR95%CI | |
Male | ||||||||
Total dealth | 61 ( 52, 72) | 84 ( 79, 89) | 77 ( 71, 83) | 75 ( 72, 78) | 80 ( 75, 84) | 79 ( 75, 84) | 84 ( 79, 90 ) | 78 ( 76, 80 ) |
All Cancer death | 72 ( 57, 90) | 87 ( 78, 96) | 76 ( 66, 87) | 73 ( 68, 78) | 82 ( 75, 90) | 83 ( 75, 92) | 97 ( 87, 106 ) | 81 ( 78, 84 ) |
Cancer site: | ||||||||
Lung (C33,C34)* | 95 ( 59, 145) | 102 ( 83, 124) | 83 ( 62, 109) | 73 ( 63, 85) | 115 ( 97, 136) | 78 ( 62, 97) | 84 ( 66, 105 ) | 87 ( 81, 94 ) |
Stomach (C16) | 62 ( 33, 106) | 82 ( 65, 103) | 100 ( 76, 130) | 86 ( 75, 89) | 80 ( 64, 98) | 64 ( 48, 82) | 96 ( 77, 119 ) | 83 ( 77, 90 ) |
Liver (C22) | 34 ( 11, 79) | 61 ( 43, 83) | 64 ( 41, 94) | 56 ( 45, 69) | 58 ( 43, 78) | 129 ( 101, 161) | 150 ( 121, 185 ) | 78 ( 70, 87 ) |
Pancreas (C25) | 120 ( 48, 247) | 115 ( 77, 165) | 82 ( 44, 141) | 63 ( 45, 86) | 97 ( 66, 138) | 86 ( 54, 131) | 78 ( 47, 122 ) | 84 ( 71, 98 ) |
Colon (Cl8) | 78 ( 25, 182) | 57 ( 33, 93) | 28 ( 9, 65) | 75 ( 56, 98) | 45 ( 26, 73) | 83 ( 53, 124) | 94 ( 61, 139 ) | 67 ( 57, 79 ) |
Gall bladder/bile duct (C23,24) | 125 ( 41, 291) | 129 ( 82, 194) | 145 ( 82, 234) | 104 ( 76, 138) | 71 ( 41, 115) | 110 ( 68, 168) | 71 ( 37, 124 ) | 102 ( 86, 121 ) |
Rectum (C19,C20) | 23 ( 1, 128) | 97 ( 57, 153) | 59 ( 24, 122) | 92 ( 66, 123) | 81 ( 48, 126) | 71 ( 38, 122) | 122 ( 77, 185 ) | 87 ( 72, 104 ) |
Esophagus (Cl5) | 101 ( 33, 235) | 118 ( 77, 175) | 30 ( 8, 77) | 59 ( 40, 83) | 41 ( 21, 74) | 69 ( 38, 116) | 88 ( 52, 139 ) | 68 ( 56, 82 ) |
Prostate (C61) | 95 ( 20, 277) | 103 ( 58, 169) | 65 ( 24, 142) | 97 ( 68, 134) | 58 ( 29, 105) | 109 ( 65, 170) | 89 ( 46, 154 ) | 90 ( 73, 109 ) |
Malignant lymphoma (C81-C85) | 130 ( 27, 380) | 79 ( 34, 156) | 94 ( 34, 205) | 71 ( 42, 112) | 70 ( 32, 133) | 97 ( 47, 179) | 93 ( 43, 177 ) | 82 ( 63, 105 ) |
Mouth (C00-C14) | 57 ( 1, 317) | 147 ( 73, 262) | 63 ( 13, 184) | 48 ( 22, 91) | 64 ( 23, 140) | 170 ( 87, 295) | 99 ( 40, 204 ) | 87 ( 65, 115 ) |
Bladder (C67) | 65 ( 2, 362) | 57 ( 16, 146) | 114 ( 37, 266) | 44 ( 19, 87) | 89 ( 38, 175) | 63 ( 20, 147) | 120 ( 52, 236 ) | 71 ( 51, 97 ) |
Lalynx (C32) | 0 — | 0 — | 0 — | 77 ( 25, 179) | 62 ( 8, 224) | 37 ( 1, 206) | 81 ( 10, 292 ) | 51 ( 24, 94 ) |
Skin (C43, C44) | 0 — | 196 ( 24, 708) | 0 — | 38 ( 1, 212) | 77 ( 2, 429) | 0 — | 100 ( 3, 557 ) | 63 ( 20, 147 ) |
Female | ||||||||
Total dealth | 66 ( 55, 79) | 72 ( 67, 78) | 71 ( 64, 79) | 69 ( 65, 72) | 69 ( 64, 74) | 61 ( 57, 65) | 74 ( 68, 79 ) | 69 ( 67, 70 ) |
All Cancer death | 75 ( 55, 99) | 79 ( 69, 89) | 75 ( 63, 89) | 80 ( 74, 87) | 63 ( 55, 72) | 72 ( 64, 80) | 83 ( 74, 93 ) | 76 ( 72, 79 ) |
Cancer site: | ||||||||
Stomach (C16) | 28 ( 6, 82) | 80 ( 57, 110) | 91 ( 59, 133) | 79 ( 63, 97) | 73 ( 52, 99) | 58 ( 41, 79) | 93 ( 70, 122 ) | 76 ( 67, 85 ) |
Lung (C33,C34) | 52 ( 14, 133) | 63 ( 40, 96) | 99 ( 61, 151) | 65 ( 49, 85) | 60 ( 39, 89) | 87 ( 64, 117) | 89 ( 62, 124 ) | 74 ( 64, 85 ) |
Liver (C22) | 82 ( 27, 191) | 86 ( 54, 128) | 50 ( 22, 99) | 70 ( 51, 95) | 35 ( 18, 63) | 86 ( 59, 120) | 133 ( 95, 183 ) | 78 ( 66, 91 ) |
Pancreas (C25) | 134 ( 49, 292) | 89 ( 53, 140) | 106 ( 56, 181) | 135 ( 104, 172) | 75 ( 44, 118) | 67 ( 41, 103) | 74 ( 43, 119 ) | 97 ( 82, 113 ) |
Colon (Cl8) | 137 ( 59, 270) | 111 ( 74, 160) | 75 ( 39, 132) | 75 ( 55, 100) | 55 ( 32, 88) | 61 ( 39, 91) | 54 ( 31, 87 ) | 73 ( 62, 85 ) |
Gall bladder/bile duct (C23,24) | 131 ( 48, 286) | 80 ( 46, 128) | 124 ( 71, 201) | 90 ( 66, 120) | 82 ( 51, 125) | 67 ( 42, 102) | 83 ( 50, 128 ) | 86 ( 73, 101 ) |
Breast (C50) | 79 ( 21, 202) | 51 ( 24, 93) | 50 ( 18, 109) | 64 ( 42, 93) | 45 ( 21, 82) | 98 ( 61, 150) | 68 ( 39, 110 ) | 64 ( 52, 79 ) |
Uterus (C53-C55) | 0 — | 72 ( 33, 137) | 80 ( 29, 174) | 71 ( 43, 110) | 104 ( 58, 171) | 98 ( 56, 159) | 89 ( 47, 151 ) | 82 ( 65, 102 ) |
Rectum (C19,C20) | 75 ( 9, 271) | 94 ( 47, 170) | 57 ( 16, 146) | 56 ( 31, 93) | 29 ( 8, 74) | 81 ( 43, 139) | 96 ( 51, 165 ) | 68 ( 52, 87 ) |
Ovary (C56) | 37 ( 1, 206) | 27 ( 6, 79) | 61 ( 17, 156) | 113 ( 75, 165) | 32 ( 9, 82) | 84 ( 42, 150) | 48 ( 18, 105 ) | 68 ( 52, 89 ) |
Malignant lymphoma (C81-C85) | 197 ( 41, 575) | 58 ( 16, 148) | 24 ( 1, 134) | 69 ( 34, 123) | 123 ( 58, 224) | 109 ( 54, 195) | 90 ( 36, 185 ) | 86 ( 63, 114 ) |
Esophagus (Cl5) | 0 — | 80 ( 16, 234) | 88 ( 11, 318) | 78 ( 31, 161) | 156 ( 63, 321) | 54 ( 11, 158) | 23 ( 1, 128 ) | 76 ( 48, 115 ) |
Bladder (C67) | 0 — | 73 ( 9, 264) | 117 ( 14, 422) | 128 ( 59, 243) | 29 ( 1, 162) | 65 ( 13, 190) | 127 ( 35, 325 ) | 90 ( 56, 138 ) |
Mouth (C00-C14) | 0 — | 211 ( 77, 460) | 0 — | 107 ( 43, 220) | 89 ( 18, 260) | 50 ( 6, 181) | 31 ( 1, 173 ) | 85 ( 51, 133 ) |
Skin (C43, C44) | 0 — | 0 0 0 | 0 — | 288 ( 106, 628) | 190 ( 23, 686) | 0 — | 0 — | 113 ( 49, 223 ) |
Lalynx (C32) | 0 — | 404 ( 10,2250) | 0 — | 0 — | 335 ( 8, 1866) | 0 — | 0 — | 99 ( 12, 357 ) |
* Code in parenthesis is ICD-10.
DISUCUSSION
The follow-up condition of cancer deaths by site as of the end of 1999 was almost same as of the end of 1997.1 The three commonest sites, cancers of the lung, stomach, and liver in males were of the same order and almost the same proportion among all cancer deaths as of the end of 1997.1 Among females, the three commonest sites, cancers of the stomach, large intestine, and lung were same in each site as of the end of 1997,1 but the proportion of cancer of the large intestine (12.3%) exceeded that of the lung (11.8%) if the cancer of the colon and rectum were combined.
SMRs of total deaths, all cancer deaths, and most site-specific cancers were less than 100 in both males and females. This means that our cohort members appeared to be less likely to die from total causes and cancers in comparison with the Japanese population as observed other Japanese cohort.8 Because some of the cohort members were selected from participants in health check-ups or other kinds of screening, they might have had slightly healthier lifestyles that prevented them from dying with lifestyle related diseases such as cancers and cerebrovascular diseases. Cohort members of each district also appeared to be slightly healthier than the general population, as most SMRs of total deaths and site-specific cancer deaths by district were less than 100. It might be due to the small cohort size that some SMRs of site-specific cancer deaths by district were more than 100. Even though our cohort members were slightly healthier than the general Japanese population in the study period, internal comparisons between an exposed group and a group of unexposed to any factors within the cohort can also be justified as a cohort study.
MEMBER LIST OF THE JACC STUDY GROUP
The present investigators involved, with the co-authorship of this paper, in the JACC Study and their affiliations are as follows: Dr. Akiko Tamakoshi (present chairman of the study group), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine; Dr. Mitsuru Mori, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine; Dr. Yutaka Motohashi, Akita University School of Medicine; Dr. Ichiro Tsuji, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Dr. Yosikazu Nakamura, Jichi Medical School; Dr. Hiroyasu Iso, Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tsukuba; Dr. Haruo Mikami, Chiba Cancer Center; Dr. Yutaka Inaba, Juntendo University School of Medicine; Dr. Yoshiharu Hoshiyama, Showa University School of Medicine; Dr. Hiroshi Suzuki, Niigata University School of Medicine; Dr. Hiroyuki Shimizu, Gifu University School of Medicine; Dr. Hideaki Toyoshima, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine; Dr. Shinkan Tokudome, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science; Dr. Yoshinori Ito, Fujita Health University School of Health Sciences; Dr. Shuji Hashimoto, Fujita Health University School of Medicine; Dr. Shogo Kikuchi, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine; Dr. Akio Koizumi, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University; Dr. Takashi Kawamura, Kyoto University Center for Student Health; Dr. Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science; Dr. Tsuneharu Miki, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science; Dr. Chigusa Date, Faculty of Human Environmental Sciences, Mukogawa Women’s University ; Dr. Kiyomi Sakata, Wakayama Medical University; Dr. Takayuki Nose, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine; Dr. Norihiko Hayakawa, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University; Dr. Takesumi Yoshimura, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan; Dr. Akira Shibata, Kurume University School of Medicine; Dr. Naoyuki Okamoto, Kanagawa Cancer Center; Dr. Hideo Shio, Moriyama Municipal Hospital; Dr. Yoshiyuki Ohno, Asahi Rosai Hospital; Dr. Tomoyuki Kitagawa, Cancer Institute of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research; Dr. Toshio Kuroki, Gifu University; and Dr. Kazuo Tajima, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors sincerely express their appreciation to Dr. Kunio Aoki, Professor Emeritus, Nagoya University School of Medicine and the former chairman of the JACC Study, and Dr. Haruo Sugano, the former Director, Cancer Institute, Tokyo, who greatly contributed to the initiation of the JACC Study, and Dr. Yoshiyuki Ohno, Professor Emeritus, Nagoya University School of Medicine, who was the past chairman of the study. The authors also wish to thank Dr. Tomoyuki Kitagawa, Cancer Institute of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research and the former chairman of Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Area ‘Cancer’, for his full support of this study.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ohno Y, Tamakoshi A; JACC Study Group . Japan collaborative cohort study for evaluation of cancer risk sponsored by monbusho (JACC study). J Epidemiol, 2001; 11: 144- 50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hirayama T. Life-style and mortality: A large-scale census-based cohort study in Japan. Karger. Basel. 1990.
- 3.The Japan Society of Home Economics. Life in Japan. Reflection on fifty years of change and future prospects. Kenpakusha. Tokyo. 1998. (in Japanese)
- 4.Ajiki W, for the Monbusho ECC (Chairman: Y. Ohno). Death code conversion from ICD-9th to ICD-10th. Nagoya. 1999. (in Japanese)
- 5.Statistics and Information Department, Ministry’s Secretariat, Ministry of Health and Welfare. Vital Statistics of Japan 1989, 1992, 1995, 1998 Volume 1. Health Statistics Association. Tokyo. 1991, 1994, 1997, 2000.
- 6.Tango T. Statistics for medicine - New version -. Asakurashoten. Tokyo. 1993. (in Japanese)
- 7.dos Santos Silva. Cancer Epidemiology: Principles and Methods. IARC. Lyon. 1999:124-5. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hara M, Sasaki S, Sobue T, Yamamoto S, Tsugane S. Comparison of cause-specific mortality between respondents and non-respondents in a population-based prospective study: Ten-year follow-up of JPHC study cohort 1. Japan Public Health Center. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 2: 150-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]