Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1999 Nov;37(11):3443–3447. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.11.3443-3447.1999

Phenotypic and Phylogenetic Characterization of a New Corynebacterium Species from Dogs: Description of Corynebacterium auriscanis sp. nov.

Matthew D Collins 1,*, Lesley Hoyles 1, Paul A Lawson 1, Enevold Falsen 2, Robert L Robson 3, Geoffrey Foster 4
PMCID: PMC85662  PMID: 10523531

Abstract

Six strains of a previously undescribed catalase-positive coryneform bacterium isolated from clinical specimens from dogs were characterized by phenotypic and molecular genetic methods. Biochemical and chemotaxonomic studies revealed that the unknown bacterium belonged to the genus Corynebacterium sensu stricto. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed that the six strains were genealogically highly related and constitute a new subline within the genus Corynebacterium; this subline is close to but distinct from C. falsenii, C. jeikeium, and C. urealyticum. The unknown bacterium from dogs was distinguished from all currently validated Corynebacterium species by phenotypic tests including electrophoretic analysis of whole-cell proteins. On the basis of phylogenetic and phenotypic evidence, it is proposed that the unknown bacterium be classified as a new species, Corynebacterium auriscanis. The type strain of C. auriscanis is CCUG 39938T.


The genus Corynebacterium contains many species which have long been recognized as pathogens of humans and/or animals. During the past two decades, the taxonomy of this important group of organisms has undergone dramatic change. In particular, the use of molecular chemical and molecular genetic methodologies has facilitated a much tighter circumscription of the genus, and the availability of comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence data combined with improved phenotypic data has resulted in much improved and more reliable species identification. These improvements in taxonomy and diagnostics, together with an increased interest in corynebacteria as opportunistic pathogens of humans, has resulted in the delineation of a plethora of new Corynebacterium species from human sources in recent years (see reference 14 for a review). Indeed, since 1990, over 20 new species that cause and/or that are associated with human disease have been described (see reference 14 for species identified prior to 1996 and previous reports for C. confusum [12], C. coyleae [13], C. durum [20], C. falsenii [24], C. imitans [8], C. kroppenstedtii [4], C. lipophiloflavum [9], C. mucifaciens [10], C. singulare [21], C. sundsvallense [3], C. riegelii [11], C. thomssenii [25]). The association of corynebacteria with animal disease has received much less attention, although there are indications (6, 7) that the implementation of improved diagnostic methods will result in a better understanding of the range of corynebacterial species involved in animal disease and in the recognition of new diversity. In this article we report on the polyphasic characterization (by use of phenotypic and molecular genetic techniques in concert) of six coryneform-like isolates that originated from clinical specimens from dogs. On the basis of the findings of this study, a new species, Corynebacterium auriscanis, is described.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cultures and cultivation.

Three of the six strains examined were isolated from specimens that originated from dogs with ear infections: strain M598/96/1 was recovered in mixed culture with Staphylococcus intermedius and Streptococcus canis from a dog suffering from bilateral otitis; strain M135/96/2 was obtained along with a Staphylococcus sp. and a Proteus sp. from a dog suffering from chronic otitis externa with a purulent discharge; strain M1426/97/3 was also recovered in mixed culture (with Malassezia pachydermatis, Streptococcus canis, and Staphylococcus intermedius) from the ear of a dog suffering from chronic pustular otitis externa. Strain M2813/97/1 was the sole isolate obtained from a dog with a deep pyoderma, whereas strain M210/98/3 was recovered from a polymicrobic infection of a dog with an interdigital cyst. Isolate M2555/95/2 was obtained from a vaginal swab together with Streptococcus canis and Staphylococcus intermedius. Strains M598/96/1, M135/96/2, M1426/97/3, M2813/97/1, and M210/98/3 have been deposited in the Culture Collection of the University of Goteborg (CCUG) under accession nos. CCUG 39938T, CCUG 39940, CCUG 39941, CCUG 39784, and CCUG 39783, respectively. All strains were cultured on Columbia agar (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood (Oxoid, Unipath Ltd., Basingstoke, United Kingdom) at 37°C in air plus 5% CO2.

Phenotypic characterization.

The strains were biochemically characterized by using the API Coryne system (API bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Enzyme reactions were read after 24 h of incubation at 37°C, whereas acid production from carbohydrates was observed after 48 h. Further enzyme reactions were studied by means of the API ZYM system. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic (PAGE) analysis of whole-cell proteins was performed as described by Pot et al. (19). For densitometric analysis and normalization and interpretation of protein patterns, the GelCompar GCW 3.0 software package (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) was used. The similarity between all pairs of traces was expressed by the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient converted for convenience to a percent similarity value. Cell wall murein was prepared by mechanical disruption of cells with a Braun homogenizer, and complete acid hydrolysates (4 M HCl) were analyzed as described by Schleifer and Kandler (23). Fatty acid methyl esters were prepared and analyzed as described by Kampfer and Kroppenstedt (16). Mycolic acid composition was determined by the methods of Minnikin et al. (18) and Klatte et al. (17). The G+C content of DNA was determined by thermal denaturation (15).

Phylogenetic characterization.

Phylogenetic analysis was conducted by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. A large fragment of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR with universal primers pA and pH* (2), close to the 3′ and 5′ ends of the gene, respectively, and was directly sequenced with a Taq dye-Deoxy terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) and an automatic DNA sequencer (model 373A; Applied Biosystems). The closest known relatives of the new isolates were determined by performing database searches. These sequences and those of other known related strains were retrieved from the GenBank or Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Libraries and were aligned with the newly determined sequence by using the program PILEUP. The resulting multiple sequence alignment was corrected manually, and a distance matrix was calculated by using the programs PRETTY and DNADIST (with the Kimura-2 correction parameter) (5). A phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method (22) with the program NEIGHBOR (5), and the stability of the groupings was estimated by bootstrap analysis (500 replications) with the programs DNABOOT, DNADIST, NEIGHBOR, and CONSENSE (5).

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain CCUG 39938T has been deposited in GenBank under accession no. AJ23851.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The six isolates obtained from clinical specimens from dogs consisted of gram-positive, nonmotile, short, club-shaped rods which occurred as single cells, in pairs, or in small clusters. The strains were catalase positive and did not require lipid supplementation for optimal growth. The isolates produced acid from glucose but not from the other carbohydrates examined. They hydrolyzed hippurate but not gelatin, starch, or urea. Esculin hydrolysis was variable. The strains displayed acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, ester lipase C8 (weak reaction), esterase C4 (weak reaction), leucine arylamidase, phosphoamidase, and pyrrolidonyl arylamidase activity. They were pyrazinamidase negative and did not reduce nitrate to nitrite. On the basis of their cellular morphologies and biochemical profiling, the isolates from dogs resembled corynebacteria, although their reactions did not conform to those for any currently recognized species. To ascertain whether or not the unidentified bacterium was a member of the genus Corynebacterium, the cell wall murein structure and lipid composition of a representative strain, strain CCUG 39938T, were determined. Analysis of the cell wall amino acid composition revealed meso-diaminopimelic acid (meso-Dpm) as the dibasic acid, together with alanine and glutamic acid, consistent with a type A1 γ directly cross-linked murein. Thin-layer chromatographic analysis of whole-organism acid methanolysates demonstrated the presence of short-chain mycolic acids within the bacterium. High-temperature gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of trimethylsilylated derivatives revealed C28 to C34 mycolic acids, with C32:0 predominating. Analysis of nonhydroxylated cellular fatty acids showed the presence of solely straight-chain saturated and monounsaturated types, with C16:0 (37%) and C18:1ω9c (51%) as the major acids. Tuberculostearic acid was not present. These chemical findings unequivocally demonstrate that strain CCUG 39938T is a member of the genus Corynebacterium. The whole-cell protein profiles of five strains (strains CCUG 39938T, CCUG 39940, CCUG 39941, CCUG 39783, and CCUG 39784) were examined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE and were compared with those of known Corynebacterium species. A dendrogram derived from a numerical analysis of protein patterns is shown in Fig. 1. The isolates were found to be phenotypically highly related and formed a robust cluster (grouping at the correlation level of greater than 80%) which was separate from all other corynebacteria examined. To determine the phylogenetic relationships of the unknown bacterium from dogs, the almost complete 16S rRNA gene sequence (1,452 bases) of a representative strain (strain CCUG 39938T) was determined. Sequence searches of the GenBank and RDP libraries revealed that the newly determined sequence was phylogenetically highly related to those of species of the genus Corynebacterium (data not shown), with C. falsenii, C. jeikeium, and C. urealyticum displaying the highest level of sequence relatedness (97, 96.5, and 96.2% sequence similarity, respectively). A tree, constructed by the neighbor-joining method, that incorporates the unknown bacterium (as exemplified by strain CCUG 39938T) and all currently described Corynebacterium species, is shown in Fig. 2. The unidentified bacterium formed a distinct subline that was close to albeit distinct from C. falsenii, C. jeikeium, and C. urealyticum. Partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing (approximately 800 bases) was performed with the other five clinical isolates, and they were found to be highly related to strain CCUG 39938T (99.9 to 100% sequence similarity).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Similarity dendrogram based on whole-cell protein pattern of C. auriscanis sp. nov. and related species. Levels of correlation are expressed as percentages of similarity for convenience.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Unrooted tree showing the phylogenetic relationships of C. auriscanis sp. nov. and members of the genus Corynebacterium. The tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method and was based on a comparison of approximately 1,320 nucleotides. Bootstrap values, expressed as a percentage of 500 replications, are given at branching points. Bar, 1% sequence divergence.

It is evident from the comparative 16S rRNA sequence analysis that the six isolates from clinical specimens from dogs are members of a hitherto unknown Corynebacterium species. Phylogenetically, the bacterium is closely related to C. falsenii, C. jeikeium, and C. urealyticum, although 16S rRNA divergence values of approximately 3% clearly demonstrate that it merits separate species status. PAGE analysis of whole-cell proteins and biochemical profiling also showed that the bacterium from dogs is distinct from the aforementioned species and all other reference corynebacteria examined. In particular, the unknown bacterium could be readily distinguished from its closest phylogenetic relatives, C. falsenii, C. jeikeium, and C. urealyticum, by its production of pyrrolidonyl aryamidase and its failure to produce pyrazinamidase. Additionally, the bacterium differs markedly from C. jeikeium and C. urealyticum in that it is nonlipophilic, and it can be further distinguished from C. falsenii and C. urealyticum in that it does not hydrolyze urea. Tests which are useful in differentiating the unknown bacterium from dogs from other nonlipophilic Corynebacterium species are shown in Table 1. It is pertinent to note that the novel bacterium from dogs can also be readily distinguished from other nonlipophilic coryneform genera, such as Arthrobacter, Aureobacterium, Cellulomonas, Curtobacterium, Exiguobacterium, and Microbacterium, in that it possesses mycolic acids, predominantly straight-chain and monounsaturated cellular fatty acids, and meso-Dpm in its cell wall. By contrast, the coryneform taxa mentioned above invariably lack mycolic acids, possess high levels of methyl branched-chain cellular fatty acids, and contain cell walls based on lysine and/or ornithine (14). Therefore, on the basis of the results of the polyphasic taxonomic investigation, we propose that the bacterium from dogs be classified as a new species, Corynebacterium auriscanis.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics useful in differentiating C. auriscanis from some other nonlipophilic Corynebacterium speciesa

Organism Nitrate reduction Urease hydrolysis Aesculin hydrolysis Pyrizinamidase reaction Alkaline phophatase Acid produced from:
CAMP reaction Myocolic acid production
Glucose Maltose Sucrose
C. auriscanis V + + +
C. confusum + + + (+) +
C. falsenii (+) W + (+) (V) +
C. amycolatum V V + + + V V
C. argentoratense + V + +
C. coyleae + + (+) + +
C. diphtheriae V + + +
C. durum + (V) (V) + + + +
C. glucuronolyticum V V V + V + V + + +
C. imitans W + + + W + +
C. matruchotii + + + + + + + +
C. minutissimum + + + + V +
C. pseudotuberculosis + V + + V REV +
C. striatum + + + + V V +
C. ulcerans + + + + REV +
C. xerosis V + + + + + +
a

Data are from references 1, 5, 6, 11, 12 and 13 and the present study. Symbols and abbreviations: parentheses, delayed reaction; W, weakly positive; V, variable; REV, reverse. 

Description of Corynebacterium auriscanis sp. nov.

Corynebacterium auriscanis (au.ris.canis. L. fem. n. auris ear; L. masc. n. canis dog; M.L. gen. n. auriscanis of the ear of the dog).

Cells are gram positive, non-spore forming, and nonmotile. They are typically club-shaped rods, which appear as single cells, in pairs, or in clusters. The cells are nonfermentative and grow under aerobic conditions but not under anaerobic conditions. The cells are CAMP reaction negative. The cells are catalase positive and nonlipophilic. Acid is produced from glucose but not from glycogen, lactose, maltose, mannitol, sucrose, ribose, or d-xylose. Hippurate is hydrolyzed. Esculin hydrolysis is variable. Gelatin and starch are not hydrolyzed. Nitrate is not reduced, and the Voges-Proskauer test is negative. Acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, ester lipase C8 (weak reaction), esterase C4 (weak reaction), leucine arylamidase, phosphoamidase, and pyrrolidonyl arylamidase activities are detected. N-Acetylglucosaminidase, chymotrypsin, cystine arylamidase, α-fucosidase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-mannosidase, pyrazinamidase, trypsin, urease, and valine arylamidase activities are not detected. Lipase C14 activity is variable. The cell wall contains meso-Dpm as the dibasic amino acid. Short-chain mycolic acids (C28 to C34) are present, with C30:0, C32:0, and C34:0 as the main components. The long-chain fatty acids are of the saturated straight-chain and monounsaturated types, with C16:0 and C18:ω9c predominating. Tuberculostearic acid is not present. The G+C content of DNA is 61 mol%. The organism was isolated from clinical specimens from dogs. Its habitat is not known. The type strain is CCUG 39938T.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Hans Trüper (University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany) for help in coining the species epithet. The excellent technical assistance of Lena Dahl is acknowledged.

The SAC Veterinary Science Division receives support from the Scottish Office Agriculture, Environmental and Fisheries Department.

REFERENCES

  • 1.API System. API CORYNE analytical profile index, 1st ed. API System. France: La-Balmes-les-Grottes; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Böddinghaus B, Wolters J, Heikens W, Böttger E C. Phylogenetic analysis and identification of six serovars of Mycobacterium intracellulare at the molecular level. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990;70:197–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb13978.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Collins M D, Bernard K A, Hutson R A, Sjödén B, Nyberg A, Falsen E. Corynebacterium sundsvallense sp. nov., from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999;49:361–366. doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-2-361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Collins M D, Falsen E, Akervall E, Sjödén B, Alvarez N. Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii sp. nov., a novel corynebacterium that does not contain mycolic acids. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998;48:1449–1454. doi: 10.1099/00207713-48-4-1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Felsenstein J. PHYLIP—phylogeny inference package (version 3.2) Cladistics. 1989;5:164–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fernandez-Garayzabal J F, Collins M D, Hutson R A, Fernandez E, Monasterio R, Marco J, Dominguez L. Corynebacterium mastitidis sp. nov., isolated from milk of sheep with subclinical mastitis. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:1082–1085. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-4-1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fernandez-Garayzabal J F, Collins M D, Hutson R A, Gonzalez I, Fernandez E, Dominguez L. Corynebacterium camporealensis sp. nov., associated with subclinical mastitis in sheep. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998;48:463–468. doi: 10.1099/00207713-48-2-463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Funke G, Efstratiou A, Kuklinska D, Hutson R A, de Zoysa A, Engler K H, Collins M D. Corynebacterium imitans sp. nov., isolated from patients with suspected diphtheria. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:1978–1983. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.1978-1983.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Funke G, Hutson R A, Hilleringmann M, Heizmann W R, Collins M D. Corynebacterium lipophiloflavum sp. nov. isolated from a patient with bacterial vaginosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;150:219–224. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1097(97)00118-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Funke G, Lawson P A, Collins M D. Corynebacterium mucifaciens sp. nov., an unusual species from human clinical material. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:952–957. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-4-952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Funke G, Lawson P A, Collins M D. Corynebacterium riegelii sp. nov., an unusual species isolated from female patients with urinary tract infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:624–627. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.3.624-627.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Funke G, Osorio C R, Frei R, Riegel P, Collins M D. Corynebacterium confusum sp. nov., isolated from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998;48:1291–1296. doi: 10.1099/00207713-48-4-1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Funke G, Pascual Ramos C, Collins M D. Corynebacterium coyleae sp. nov., isolated from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:92–96. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-1-92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Funke G, Von Graevenitz A, Clarridge J E, Bernard K A. Clinical microbiology of coryneform bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:125–159. doi: 10.1128/cmr.10.1.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Garvie E I. Streptococcus raffinolactis (Orla-Jensen and Hansen): a group N Streptococcus found in raw milk. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1978;28:190–193. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kampfer P, Kroppenstedt R M. Numerical analysis of fatty acid patterns of coryneform bacteria and related taxa. Can J Microbiol. 1996;42:989–1005. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Klatte S, Kroppenstedt R M, Rainey F A. Rhodococcus opacus sp. nov. an unusual nutritionally versatile Rhodococcus species. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1994;17:355–360. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Minnikin D E, Hutchinson I G, Caldicott A B, Goodfellow M. Thin-layer chromatography of methanolysates of mycolic acid-containing bacteria. J Chromatogr. 1980;188:221–233. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pot B, Vandamme P, Kersters K. Analysis of electrophoretic whole-organism protein fingerprints. In: Goodfellow M, O'Donnell A G, editors. Modern microbial methods. Chemical methods in prokaryotic systematics. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 1994. pp. 493–521. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Riegel P, Heller R, Prevost G, Jehl F, Monteil H. Corynebacterium durum sp. nov., from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:1107–1111. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-4-1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Riegel P, Ruimy R, Renaud F N R, Freney J, Prévost G, Jehl F, Christen R, Monteil H. Corynebacterium singulare sp. nov., a new species of urease-positive strains related to Corynebacterium minutissimum. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:1092–1096. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-4-1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schleifer K H, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev. 1972;34:407–477. doi: 10.1128/br.36.4.407-477.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sjödén B, Funke G, Izquierdo A, Akervall E, Collins M D. Description of some coryneform bacteria isolated from human clinical specimens as Corynebacterium falsenii sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998;48:69–74. doi: 10.1099/00207713-48-1-69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zimmerman O, Spröer C, Kroppenstedt R M, Fuchs E, Köchel H G, Funke G. Corynebacterium thomssenii sp. nov., a Corynebacterium with N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase activity from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998;48:489–494. doi: 10.1099/00207713-48-2-489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES