Abstract
Purpose
[68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 is a promising radiopharmaceutical for detecting tumour lesions in prostate cancer, but knowledge of the pharmacokinetics is limited. Dynamic PET-CT was performed to investigate the tumour detection and differences in temporal distribution, as well as in kinetic modelling of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 by tissue type.
Methods
Dynamic PET-CT over the lower abdomen and static whole-body PET-CT 80–90 min p.i. from 142 patients with biochemical recurrence were retrospectively analysed. Detection rates were compared to PSA levels. Average time-activity curves were calculated from tumour lesions and normal tissue. A three-compartment model and non-compartment model were used to calculate tumour kinetics.
Results
Overall detection rate was 70.42%, and in patients with PSA > 0.4 ng/mL 76.67%. All tumour lesions presented the steepest standardised uptake value (SUV) incline in the first 7–8 min before decreasing to different degrees. Normal tissue presented with a low uptake, except for the bladder, which accumulated activity the steepest 15–16 min. p.i.. While all tumour lesions continuously increased, bone metastases showed the steepest decline, resulting in a significantly lower SUV than lymph node metastases (60 and 80–90 min). Transport rate from the blood and tracer binding and internalisation rate were lower in bone metastases. Heterogeneity (fractal dimension) and vascular density were significantly lower in bone metastases.
Conclusion
Even at low PSA between 0.51 and 0.99 ng/mL, detection rate was 57%. Dynamic imaging showed a time window in the first 10 min where tumour uptake is high, but no bladder activity is measured, aiding accuracy in distinction of local recurrence. Kinetic modelling provided additional information for tumour characterisation by tissue type.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05420-1.
Keywords: Ga-PSMA, PSMA, PSMA Kinetic, Recurrent prostate cancer
Introduction
In the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC) recurrence, the detection of tumour lesions is essentially based on risk assessments using tumour markers and clinical information, as conventional imaging (computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), transrectal ultrasound, bone scintigraphy) shows insufficient performance in depicting a progression of the disease. An increase in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after initial treatment is referred to as a biochemical recurrence (BCR) and indicates a progression of the disease. However, this PSA increase precedes a clinically manifest metastasis by an average of 7 to 8 years, whereby only 11 to 14% of patients with biochemical recurrence even show a detectable tumour lesion in CT. PSA may also be elevated in the natural course after therapy, making the presence of BCR a highly variable risk factor for prostate cancer mortality, which complicates diagnosis and therapy. Patients with biochemical recurrence who receive curative, local therapy particularly early benefit best from this. However, it is in this group of patients with PSA < 1 that conventional imaging techniques fail most in detecting tumour lesions. At the same time, patients with metastatic disease benefit less from local therapy, as they require systemic therapy. The detection of tumour lesions in biochemical recurrence is therefore essential to distinguish between local and systemic progression [1]. Since its first application in 2011, imaging with [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in prostate cancer has proven to be a potential game changer in recurrence diagnostics [2–8].
Knowledge about the pharmacokinetics of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in PET-CT is still limited, as static acquisition limits distributional information to a single time point. This study has three major goals: First, to demonstrate the detection of tumour lesions with [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate carcinoma. Secondly, to illustrate the temporal distribution of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in tumour lesions and normal tissue. Third, differences between tumour lesions will be assessed using a kinetic model (compartment and non-compartment). The primary objective is to find differences between lymph node metastases and bone metastases in terms of standardised uptake value (SUV), heterogeneity (FD), vascular density (VB), receptor binding and internalisation rate (k3), and transport rate from blood (K1).
Materials and methods
A total of 160 [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT scans from 142 patients were retrospectively evaluated, excluding patients without any initial therapy. Patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) were counted as BCR as soon as the PSA was detectable (> 0.004 ng/mL). Eighteen PET-CT follow-up examinations were excluded from the quantitative and statistical analysis in order to avoid bias. A small number of patients have already been published in other studies [9, 10]. This analysis was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Heidelberg (S-253/2019). All subjects signed an informed consent form.
Gallium-68 was eluted on site from a germanium-68 generator and subsequently bound to the urea-based prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitor PSMA-HBED-CC, namely PSMA-11, bearing the targeting vector Glu-urea-Lys using a radiosynthesizer as already described [11, 12].
The acquisition protocol (Fig. 1) was recorded with a Siemens Biograph mCT (TrueV configuration FOV 22.1 cm, HD-PET) using low-dose CT (128 detector rows, 120 keV, 30 mAs). The PET protocol was specially customised in order to dynamically acquire two bed positions (pelvis and lower abdomen) alternately, thus doubling the FOV (44.2 cm). The dynamic acquisition consisted of 24 frames (ten frames each 30 s, five frames each 60 s, five frames each 120 s and four frames each 600 s). Static PET had an image duration of 2 min per bed position. 400 × 400 pixels PET images were iteratively reconstructed using an ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM) algorithm, which divided the data into 12 subsets with 6 iterations to accelerate calculation [13].
Qualitatively, contrast and distinctiveness were assessed with the Aycan workstation 3.14.006. Quantitatively, five tumour lesions (categorised as local recurrence, lymph node metastases, bone metastases and other metastases) per patient were selected that were preferably visible in dynamic and static PET for comparability and could be well-differentiated using PMOD 3.7. A lesion in PET was considered pathological if it showed a morphological correlate in CT, which did not correspond to a structure with physiological PSMA uptake. Therefore, PSMA avid but normal-sized lymph nodes were considered pathological. Known pitfalls, like sympathetic ganglia and bone fractures, were taken into consideration [14]. Four normal tissues were selected in the dynamic images (input, bladder, colon, m. gluteus). Lesions were assessed with a volume of interest (VOI) in isocontour mode (pseudosnake). The most important quantitative value in PET is SUV, setting the measured activity of a lesion in relation to the applied activity and body weight [15]. SUVs early were measured in the last 10 min of the dynamic acquisition, SUV late in the static PET 80–90 min p.i.. The results were evaluated by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians (CS, ADS).
From the dynamic PET, mean time-activity curves and in addition kinetic parameters were calculated by means of a three-compartment model (Fig. 2). Kinetic models derived from pharmacology are an adaptable tool for dividing physiological steps into subsystems in order to represent biological processes in a simplified way [16–18]. The individual compartments are tracer parts that behave uniformly and interact with each other. The gold standard to measure the tracer flow is a periodic arterial blood sample parallel to the PET. A simpler and more efficient way is to retrieve the input function from the VOI of an arterial vessel [19, 20]. The quality of the input function is user-dependent, as it is crucial to set a narrow activity peak by means of a narrow VOI. The common iliac artery was chosen for the input function; depending on the representability, the abdominal aorta was used. In order to avoid overfitting in iterative fitting of the kinetics, which would increase image noise, and to make the methodology less user-dependent, the PKIN module in PMOD was modified by our research group at DKFZ: A machine learning algorithm approximated the iterative fitting using a database of confirmed tumour lesion data to find a first approximation of the kinetic parameters based on the quality of the given database. In the second step, the curve fit was performed using the classical Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm, depending on the quality of the fit (based on the Akaike criterion and the chi-square value), as presented in previous studies [20, 21]. Besides K1 to k4, the vessel density VB (fractional blood volume) was also calculated. As a quality criterion, the model was accepted if 0 < VB < 1 and K1, k2, k3 and k4 were < 1.
In addition to the compartment modelling, a non-compartment analysis was carried out, by means of which the fractal dimension (FD) was calculated from the time-activity data for each pathological VOI according to the so-called box-counting principle. The FD is a dimensionless parameter, with values ranging between 0 and 2 in a two-dimensional space, used to describe the temporal heterogeneity of activity accumulation within a VOI. Values close to 0 thus show a deterministic distribution, values close to 2 correspondingly a chaotic distribution of the tracer activity over the temporal measurement [20, 22].
The statistical analysis was done with Stata/MP 14.2 (StataCorp LLC). The detection rate was evaluated in comparison to PSA levels. To validate the kinetic parameters, a Spearman rank correlation analysis was performed with the SUV early. After testing for normal distribution (histogram, Shapiro–Wilk W test), a Wilcoxon rank sum test (5% significance level) was chosen to verify the research hypothesis. In order not to generate α-error inflation, as well as to maintain the significance level at good power, the testing of differences between lymph node metastases and bone metastases was done a priori: SUVmean early, SUVmax early, SUVmean late, SUVmax late, FD, VB, k3 and K1.
Results
[68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT provided a subjectively good image quality with high contrast of the tumour lesions at very low background activity. The detection rate in the entire collective was 70.42% (100/142) with a median PSA of 2.3 ng/mL (reported in 137/142 patients). A total of 40 patients (28.2%) had a PSA < 1, and 11 patients (7.8%) after radical prostatectomy had a PSA < 0.2. The median Gleason score was 7 (reported in 97/142 patients); the applied activity averaged 193.6 MBq ± 62.87. In the subgroup of patients with PSA < 1, the detection rate was 45% (18/40), in patients with 0.2 < PSA < 1 and 0.4 < PSA < 1, the detection rate was 50% (14/28) and 55.56% (10/18), respectively. Patients with a PSA increase to > 2 ng/mL showed a higher detection rate of 83.75% (67/80).
Patients with a pathological PET-CT had a higher PSA than patients with a negative PET-CT (median 3.5 vs. 0.72). The Gleason score was the same in both groups (median 7).
The static whole-body PET-CT images showed a physiologically filled bladder with visualisation of the kidneys and ureters, as well as accumulation of the salivary glands, liver, spleen and intestinal parts in all patients. A total of 272 tumour lesions were selected, including 23 local recurrences, 181 lymph node metastases, 61 bone metastases and seven other metastases (soft tissue and lung). All tumour lesions of the dynamic images were also visible in the static images.
From the dynamic PET-CT images, 226 tumour lesions in the pelvis and lower abdomen could be quantitatively evaluated (Table 1), including 23 local recurrences, 168 lymph node metastases, 34 bone metastases and one other metastasis (soft tissue). In total, 452 VOIs were drawn in normal tissue, of which 113 were input, 113 colon, 113 bladder and 113 gluteal muscle (Table 2). Local recurrences near the bladder were easier to differentiate in the early dynamic frames, as shown in Figs. 3 and 4. The mean time-activity curves (TACs) in Fig. 5 showed that tumour lesions had an extremely steep increase in activity within the first few minutes, which flattened out to varying degrees but remained continuously increasing. The arterial vessels had the highest activity from the beginning of the measurement, with the input falling extremely steeply within the first minutes. The bladder only showed a flat ascent after 7 to 8 min, which increased slowly. Then, 15 to 16 min p.i., the bladder showed the strongest increase of all detected lesions, which at this point had reached the SUV level of tumour lesions and was continuously increasing. The colon had a low and hardly changed uptake over time. The background activity in the gluteus muscle was extremely low and plateau-like.
Table 1.
Local recurrence | Lymph node metas | Bone metas | Other metastasis | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median | |
SUVmean early | 14.6 ± 14.29 | 8.39 | 15.24 ± 20.36 | 9.24 | 11.36 ± 14.6 | 5.63 | 12.31 | 12.31 |
SUVmax early | 25.49 ± 21.41 | 16.54 | 26.39 ± 34.17 | 16.06 | 19.15 ± 23.42 | 8.82 | 23.78 | 23.78 |
K1 | 0.16 ± 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.19 ± 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.19 ± 0.2 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.18 |
k2 | 0.15 ± 0.2 | 0.08 | 0.2 ± 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.23 ± 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
k3 | 0.36 ± 0.35 | 0.21 | 0.32 ± 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.29 ± 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
k4 | 0.18 ± 0.31 | 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.28 | 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.25 | 0.02 | 5e-74 | 5e-74 |
VB | 0.01 ± 0.02 | 3.3e-14 | 0.05 ± 0.12 | 5.44e-3 | 0.03 ± 0.07 | 1.3e-4 | 6e-04 | 6e-04 |
FD | 1.25 ± 0.1 | 1.26 | 1.25 ± 0.12 | 1.28 | 1.22 ± 0.09 | 1.23 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Table 2.
Bladder | Input | Colon | Gluteus | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median | |
SUVmean early | 35.78 ± 30.62 | 28.42 | 1.03 ± 0.55 | 0.97 | 4.41 ± 2.57 | 3.81 | 0.38 ± 0.12 | 0.37 |
SUVmax early | 50.42 ± 43.53 | 36.68 | 2.21 ± 5.05 | 1.38 | 8.24 ± 4.57 | 7.74 | 0.82 ± 0.31 | 0.76 |
Evaluation of kinetics using the three-compartment model is shown in Fig. 6: bone metastases had a minimally lower transport rate from the blood (K1) compared to lymph node metastases (median 0.1 vs. 0.15). Bone metastases also showed a slightly lower receptor binding and internalisation rate than lymph node metastases (median 0.19 vs. 0.21). Vessel density, VB, was by far the lowest in local recurrences (median 3.3e-14) and higher in bone metastases and lymph node metastases, respectively (median 1.3e-4 vs. 5.44e-3). The fractal dimension was minimally lower in bone metastases than in lymph node metastases (median 1.23 vs. 1.28). Local recurrences, with the exception of VB, mostly showed kinetic parameters between the level of lymph node metastases and bone metastases with a slight tendency towards the level of lymph node metastases (Table 1).
Spearman rank correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation of the FD with the SUVmean early and SUVmax early of all tumour lesions with Rho (ρ) = 0.95 and 0.91, which was also strongly maintained in the subgroup analysis of the SUVs of the individual tumour classes (local recurrences, lymph node metastases and bone metastases) with Rho (ρ) > 0.7. VB showed only a weak correlation with both SUVs of tumour lesions measured in dynamics with Rho (ρ) < 0.1. The transport rate from blood K1 showed a medium strong correlation with SUVmean early and SUVmax early of all tumour lesions Rho (ρ) = 0.37 and 0.38. The receptor binding and internalisation rate k3 also showed a medium strong correlation with SUVmean early and SUVmax early with Rho (ρ) = 0.32 and 0.31.
A Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed á priori to further refine the differences between lymph node metastases and bone metastases in all SUVs, FD, VB, k3 and K1. The greater decrease in the TAC of bone metastases was expressed in a significantly lower SUVmean early and SUVmax early compared to lymph node metastases (median 5.63 vs. 9.24; median 8.82 vs. 16.06; p ≤ 0.05). In the static whole-body images 80–90 min p.i., the SUVmean late and SUVmax late correspondingly were also significantly lower in bone metastases than those in lymph node metastases (median 6.03 vs. 10.63; median 11.46 vs. 19.86; p ≤ 0.05; Table 3). Likewise, FD (heterogeneity) and VB (vessel density) were significantly lower in bone metastases (median 1.23 vs. 1.28; median 1.3 × 10−4 vs. 5.44 × 10−3 p ≤ 0.05). The differences in receptor binding and internalisation rate k3 were not significant, so to maintain the significance level, no further testing of K1 was carried out.
Table 3.
Local recurrence | Lymph node metas | Bone metas | Other metastases | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median | |
SUVmean late | 13.11 ± 11.53 | 11.11 | 15.75 ± 18.79 | 10.63 | 10.13 ± 11.09 | 6.03 | 5.55 ± 3.96 | 3.91 |
SUVmax late | 34.41 ± 26.97 | 23.19 | 30.22 ± 37.48 | 19.86 | 20.03 ± 22.45 | 11.46 | 12.53 ± 12.89 | 7.14 |
Discussion
In total, 27 to 53% of all patients with prostate carcinoma develop BCR after initial therapy (radiation or radical prostatectomy), which can be an indication of progression, but also occurs in the natural course and with benign processes. Conventional imaging (CT, MRI, transrectal ultrasound, bone scintigraphy) shows poor detection rates in recurrence diagnosis, which is why clinical and histological parameters are used to assess the risk of tumour progression. In the worst case, patients with BCR undergo several imaging modalities without detectable lesions. The type and choice of therapy is very difficult because of the trade-off between toxicity if over-treated and tumour progression if under-treated. The identification of tumour lesions to detect and differentiate between local and systemic progression is therefore essential [1].
The overall detection rate (70%) was lower in this study than in the main literature, due to different patient populations. PSMA upregulation is known to depend on PSA, histological parameters and also hormone therapy [23–27]. In this collective, the median PSA was relatively low (2.3 ng/mL), and, most importantly, patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL were also counted as BCR, which makes detection much more difficult but also represents a realistic patient collective. Better comparable are, therefore, the detection rates of the difficult subgroup with 0.4 < PSA < 1 (56%) and PSA > 2 (84%). A study with a homogeneous patient population found an overall higher detection rate of 89.5%, which was stratified by PSA 0.5– < 1 still 72.73% [28]. Afshar-Oromieh et al. reported a detection rate of 79.5% with comparable PSA (median 2.2) in the patient population. The subgroup with PSA 0.51– ≤ 1 had a detection rate of 73% [3]. A recent meta-analysis of histopathologically validated lesions reported a detection rate for PSA < 2 and > 2 of 63% and 94%, respectively [4].
The detection rate of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in BCR is thus higher than in all other imaging modalities [2, 7]. CT and MRI detect lymph node metastases by size and morphology, but this is quite inaccurate because benign lymph nodes also vary greatly in size, resulting in only 2.5% of patients with lymph node metastases being detected by CT [1]. PSMA also showed the best detection rate for bone metastases in a recent meta-analysis [6]. Especially, patients with PSA rises < 0.5 ng/mL benefit from early curative salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy, with 80% remaining progression-free for 5 years [1]. The strength of PSMA imaging in the future may lie in identifying these patients as well as those who require systemic therapy due to metastases. Phase-III studies are also investigating whether dose application can be optimised by adjusting the radiation field to increase efficacy and minimise side effects [29]. Molecular diagnostics using [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT further offers the chance of much finer therapy monitoring, as metabolic changes usually precede anatomical adaptation by a long way [30]. A persistent sclerosis of a bone metastasis after radiation on CT could be classified as a benign healing process on PET and at the same time the rising PSA could be explained by a local recurrence (Fig. 7). In another patient follow-up, [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT showed uptake in two known rib metastases, despite a non-detectable PSA (< 0.004 ng/mL), thus providing valuable information to the therapist.
Renal excretion is a shortcoming in [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 imaging, which can make it difficult to delineate local recurrence. To further increase the contrast of the tumour lesions and at the same time reduce bladder activity, late imaging 3 h p.i. and furosemide administration with abundant hydration have been suggested [3]. With these measures, bladder activity could be reduced but still remained prominent with a SUVmax of 22.1 [31]. However, due to the short half-life (67.9 min), the count rate of 68 Ga is lower, and in one study, 21% of bone metastases even showed a reduced uptake in the late images 2.5 h p.i. [32]. A more innovative approach may be, therefore, to acquire early pelvic images in the first 5 to 10 min p.i., as tumour lesions show an extremely rapid onset even before activity is measured in the bladder. Using time window (Fig. 5C) has been postulated by several authors and the data of this analysis underline this idea [33]. Uprimny et al. were able to double the detection rate of local recurrences in 203 patients (12.8% vs. 24.6%) by static early imaging (5 min p.i.) [34]. Sachpekidis et al. were able to detect local recurrence in one out of four patients only on dynamic images in a small cohort [9]. In this study, all local recurrences were visible on static and dynamic PET, but the dynamic images aided differentiation by increasing diagnostic certainty. Acquisition protocols for [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT could, therefore, ideally include an additional early acquisition of the pelvis as it is convenient to integrate into the clinical routine. The contrast of the tumour lesions was increased after 60 min as well as 80–90 min, although a static whole-body image after 1 h still appears to be reasonable due to its ease of implementation.
To further characterise the tumour lesions in patients with BCR, this study demonstrated the feasibility of a three-compartment model and non-compartment model to calculate kinetic parameters. Bone metastases showed the strongest SUV decrease of all tumour lesions in the TAC, which was expressed in a significantly lower SUV. The kinetics of bone metastases also showed a slightly lower transport rate from the blood K1 and receptor binding and internalisation rate k3 compared to that of lymph node metastases, with a medium correlation to the SUV. The application of the three-compartment model could offer a possible explanation and characterisation of tracer uptake in the tumour lesions. However, a comparative analysis showed no statistical significance for the differences for k3. K1 could not be tested due to hierarchical testing.
The calculation of the vessel density, VB, was shown to be comparatively low in this work, especially in local recurrences [10, 20]. It is known from the literature that VB is significantly increased in some malignant bone tumours, soft tissue tumours (sarcomas) and the semi-malignant giant cell tumours. Furthermore, a significant decrease in VB is reported in immunotherapy monitoring [20]. Thus, vascular density, VB, could prove to be a useful parameter in diagnostics and therapy monitoring. The robustness of the calculation of this study, as well as the diagnostic value in terms of prognostic significance and therapy response, is left to further studies, partly due to the weak correlation of VB with SUV.
A promising factor in this study was the FD, which was calculated with a non-compartmental model. By measuring the FD, the details of the time-activity curves were described, or more precisely, the complexity of the curves. In addition to a strong correlation with all SUVs, the FD was also significantly higher in lymph node metastases than in bone metastases. In a study by Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss et al. with FDG, it was shown in 200 tumour lesions of different entities after primary therapy that FD values > 1.13 indicate malignancy with an accuracy of 83% [22]. In metastatic melanoma, the FD could continue to be used successfully for monitoring immunotherapy, as it decreased correspondingly to therapy response [20]. Due to the high correlation with the SUV and the successful application in other tumour entities, the FD appears to be a robust and investigator-independent parameter for characterising the PSMA tracer kinetics in prostate carcinomas.
Kinetic modelling presented a simplified measurement of complex tumour biology. The potential of these functional parameters has the chance to further advance molecular imaging and improve both diagnostics and therapy management with [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. The calculation of kinetics from dynamic measurements has also been successfully demonstrated for [18F]PSMA-1007 [35]. A future approach may be to use artificial intelligence to analyse the whole dataset of dynamic measurements with or without kinetic modelling. Using a large database of confirmed [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 tumour lesions and normal tissue, an algorithm could independently find significant parameters that best characterise tumour lesions. The limitation of this research, however, could be the lower comprehensibility of the calculations, but the accuracy of the values could be even higher. In particular, a multiparametric score based on the combination of SUV, kinetic parameters K1 and k3, vessel density and fractal dimension should be evaluated in larger prospective studies for selection of patients for PSMA therapy and compared to current approaches.
Limitations
One limitation of this study is the technically limited FOV of the dynamic acquisition of the used PET-CT scanner. Newer-generation whole-body PET-CT scanners overcome this limitation and enable whole-body dynamic acquisition including parametric imaging like Patlak analysis [36–38]. Another limitation is the lack of histopathological validation which is not possible in routine studies. Furthermore, the impact of hormone therapy was not considered due to the retrospective character of this study.
Conclusion
[68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT is suitable for detecting tumour lesions in biochemical recurrent prostate cancer, as the detection rate for PSA > 2 was 84%. In the difficult subgroup with 0.4 < PSA < 1, there were still 56% of patients positive on PET-CT. Dynamic imaging for visualising pharmacokinetics shows that all tumour lesions demonstrate the strongest increase in activity within the first 10 min due to a high blood clearance, which then flatten out to varying degrees. This time window can be used to acquire early images without bladder activity interfering with the differentiation of local recurrences. In this study, no further lesions were detected by early imaging; however, distinction of local recurrences was easier due to lower bladder activity. Bone metastases showed the greatest decrease in activity, as evidenced by a significantly lower SUV after 60 min compared to lymph node metastases. The application of a three-compartment model and a non-compartment model based on the calculation of the fractal dimension demonstrated a lower transport rate from the blood, lower binding and internalisation rate, significantly lower vessel density and significantly lower heterogeneity for bone metastases compared to lymph node metastases. Kinetic parameters could therefore further characterise the kinetics of tumour lesions, with heterogeneity (fractal dimension FD) in particular being a promising parameter due to its high correlation with SUV, as well as being robust and investigator-independent.
Supplementary Information
Author contribution
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Dimitrios Strauss and Leyun Pan under Supervision from Prof Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Dr Christos Sachpekidis and Prof Uwe Haberkorn. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Dimitrios Strauss, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
PMOD 3.7, Aycan workstation 3.14.006, Stata/MP 14.2 (StataCorp LLC).
Declarations
Ethical approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethical Committee of the University of Heidelberg (S-253/2019).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and images.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. KK is member of the SAB of Telix Pharmaceuticals. Regarding the here presented work KK does not have any conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Oncology—Genitourinary
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.(EAU) EAoU. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020.; 2020.
- 2.Afshar-Oromieh A, Babich JW, Kratochwil C, Giesel FL, Eisenhut M, Kopka K, et al. The rise of PSMA ligands for diagnosis and therapy of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:79S–89S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Afshar-Oromieh A, Holland-Letz T, Giesel FL, Kratochwil C, Mier W, Haufe S, et al. Diagnostic performance of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: evaluation in 1007 patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1258–1268. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3711-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hope TA, Goodman JZ, Allen IE, Calais J, Fendler WP, Carroll PR. Metaanalysis of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy for the detection of prostate cancer validated by histopathology. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:786–793. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.219501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fendler WP, Calais J, Eiber M, Flavell RR, Mishoe A, Feng FY, et al. Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:856–863. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhou J, Gou Z, Wu R, Yuan Y, Yu G, Zhao Y. Comparison of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Skelet Radiol. 2019;48:1915–1924. doi: 10.1007/s00256-019-03230-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eiber M, Fendler WP, Rowe SP, Calais J, Hofman MS, Maurer T, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands for imaging and therapy. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:67S–76S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Afshar-Oromieh A, Haberkorn U, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Zechmann CM. [68Ga]Gallium-labelled PSMA ligand as superior PET tracer for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison with 18F-FECH. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1085–1086. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2069-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sachpekidis C, Pan L, Hadaschik BA, Kopka K, Haberkorn U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in prostate cancer local recurrence: impact of early images and parametric analysis. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;8:351–359. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sachpekidis C, Eder M, Kopka K, Mier W, Hadaschik BA, Haberkorn U, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 dynamic PET/CT imaging in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1288–1299. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3302-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schäfer M, Bauder-Wüst U, Leotta K, Zoller F, Mier W, Haberkorn U, et al. A dimerized urea-based inhibitor of the prostate-specific membrane antigen for 68Ga-PET imaging of prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2012;2:23. doi: 10.1186/2191-219x-2-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eder M, Neels O, Müller M, Bauder-Wüst U, Remde Y, Schäfer M, et al. Novel preclinical and radiopharmaceutical aspects of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC: a new PET tracer for imaging of prostate cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2014;7:779–796. doi: 10.3390/ph7070779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gaitanis A, Kontaxakis G, Spyrou G, Panayiotakis G, Tzanakos G. Studying the properties of the updating coefficients in the OSEM algorithm for iterative image reconstruction in PET. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2010;99:219–229. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sheikhbahaei S, Werner RA, Solnes LB, Pienta KJ, Pomper MG, Gorin MA, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging of prostate cancer: an update on important pitfalls. Semin Nucl Med. 2019;49:255–270. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2019.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Strauss LG, Conti PS. The applications of PET in clinical oncology. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:623–48; discussion 49–50. [PubMed]
- 16.Sokoloff L, Smith CB. Basic principles underlying radioisotopic methods for assay of biochemical processes in vivo. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1983. p. 202–34.
- 17.Burger C, Buck A. Requirements and implementation of a flexible kinetic modeling tool. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1818–1823. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Koeppe RA, Holthoff VA, Frey KA, Kilbourn MR, Kuhl DE. Compartmental analysis of [11C]flumazenil kinetics for the estimation of ligand transport rate and receptor distribution using positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991;11:735–744. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ringheim A, Campos Neto GC, Anazodo U, Cui L, da Cunha ML, Vitor T, et al. Kinetic modeling of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 and validation of simplified methods for quantification in primary prostate cancer patients. EJNMMI Res. 2020;10:12. doi: 10.1186/s13550-020-0594-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Pan L, Sachpekidis C. Kinetic modeling and parametric imaging with dynamic PET for oncological applications: general considerations, current clinical applications, and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04843-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pan L, Cheng C, Haberkorn U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Machine learning-based kinetic modeling: a robust and reproducible solution for quantitative analysis of dynamic PET data. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:3566–3581. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG, Mikolajczyk K, Burger C, Lehnert T, Bernd L, et al. On the fractal nature of dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) studies. World J Nucl Med. 2003;2:306–313. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Silver DA, Pellicer I, Fair WR, Heston WD, Cordon-Cardo C. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:81–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wright GL, Jr, Haley C, Beckett ML, Schellhammer PF. Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in normal, benign, and malignant prostate tissues. Urol Oncol. 1995;1:18–28. doi: 10.1016/1078-1439(95)00002-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Afshar-Oromieh A, Debus N, Uhrig M, Hope TA, Evans MJ, Holland-Letz T, et al. Impact of long-term androgen deprivation therapy on PSMA ligand PET/CT in patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:2045–2054. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4079-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Barnard M, Mostaghel EA, Auchus RJ, Storbeck KH. The role of adrenal derived androgens in castration resistant prostate cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2020;197:105506. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hope TA, Truillet C, Ehman EC, Afshar-Oromieh A, Aggarwal R, Ryan CJ, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging of response to androgen receptor inhibition: first human experience. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:81–84. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.181800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Eiber M, Maurer T, Souvatzoglou M, Beer AJ, Ruffani A, Haller B, et al. Evaluation of hybrid (6)(8)Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:668–674. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.154153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Calais J, Armstrong WR, Kishan AU, Booker KM, Hope TA, Fendler WP, 2020. Update from PSMA-SRT trial NCT03582774: a randomized phase 3 imaging trial of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography for salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer recurrence powered for clinical outcome. Eur Urol Focus. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Kim JH, Kim BJ, Jang HJ, Kim HS. Comparison of the RECIST and EORTC PET criteria in the tumor response assessment: a pooled analysis and review. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;80:729–735. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3411-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Afshar-Oromieh A, Sattler LP, Mier W, Hadaschik BA, Debus J, Holland-Letz T, et al. The clinical impact of additional late PET/CT imaging with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:750–755. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.183483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alberts I, Sachpekidis C, Gourni E, Boxler S, Gross T, Thalmann G, et al. Dynamic patterns of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in recurrent prostate cancer lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:160–167. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04545-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Uprimny C, Kroiss AS, Decristoforo C, Fritz J, Warwitz B, Scarpa L, et al. Early dynamic imaging in (68)Ga- PSMA-11 PET/CT allows discrimination of urinary bladder activity and prostate cancer lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:765–775. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3578-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Uprimny C, Kroiss AS, Fritz J, Decristoforo C, Kendler D, von Guggenberg E, et al. Early PET imaging with [68]Ga-PSMA-11 increases the detection rate of local recurrence in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1647–1655. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3743-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sachpekidis C, Afshar-Oromieh A, Kopka K, Strauss DS, Pan L, Haberkorn U, et al. (18)F-PSMA-1007 multiparametric, dynamic PET/CT in biochemical relapse and progression of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:592–602. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04569-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Feng T, Zhao Y, Shi H, Zhang X, Wang G, Badawi RD, et al. Total-body quantitative parametric imaging of early kinetics of FDG. J Nucl Med. 2020 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.238113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang X, Xie Z, Berg E, Judenhofer MS, Liu W, Xu T, et al. Total-body dynamic reconstruction and parametric imaging on the uEXPLORER. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:285–291. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.230565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rahmim A, Lodge MA, Karakatsanis NA, Panin VY, Zhou Y, McMillan A, et al. Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:501–518. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4153-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Calais J, Armstrong WR, Kishan AU, Booker KM, Hope TA, Fendler WP, 2020. Update from PSMA-SRT trial NCT03582774: a randomized phase 3 imaging trial of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography for salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer recurrence powered for clinical outcome. Eur Urol Focus. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
PMOD 3.7, Aycan workstation 3.14.006, Stata/MP 14.2 (StataCorp LLC).