Skip to main content
Trials logoLink to Trials
letter
. 2021 Nov 4;22:768. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05733-4

Update to a randomized controlled trial of lutetium-177-PSMA in Oligo-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: the BULLSEYE trial

Bastiaan M Privé 1, Marcel J R Janssen 1, Inge M van Oort 2, Constantijn H J Muselaers 2, Marianne A Jonker 3, Willemijn A van Gemert 1, Michel de Groot 1, Harm Westdorp 4, Niven Mehra 4, J Fred Verzijlbergen 1, Tom W J Scheenen 1, Patrik Zámecnik 1, Jelle O Barentsz 1, Martin Gotthardt 1, Walter Noordzij 5, Wouter V Vogel 6,7, Andries M Bergman 8, Henk G van der Poel 9, André N Vis 10, Daniela E Oprea-Lager 11, Winald R Gerritsen 4, J Alfred Witjes 2, James Nagarajah 1,
PMCID: PMC8566967  PMID: 34736509

Abstract

Background

The BULLSEYE trial is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis if 177Lu-PSMA is an effective treatment in oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (oHSPC) to prolong the progression-free survival (PFS) and postpone the need for androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The original study protocol was published in 2020. Here, we report amendments that have been made to the study protocol since the commencement of the trial.

Changes in methods and materials

Two important changes were made to the original protocol: (1) the study will now use 177Lu-PSMA-617 instead of 177Lu-PSMA-I&T and (2) responding patients with residual disease on 18F-PSMA PET after the first two cycles are eligible to receive additional two cycles of 7.4 GBq 177Lu-PSMA in weeks 12 and 18, summing up to a maximum of 4 cycles if indicated. Therefore, patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617 will also receive an interim 18F-PSMA PET scan in week 4 after cycle 2. The title of this study was modified to; “Lutetium-177-PSMA in Oligo-metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer” and is now partly supported by Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis Company.

Conclusions

We present an update of the original study protocol prior to the completion of the study. Treatment arm patients that were included and received 177Lu-PSMA-I&T under the previous protocol will be replaced.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04443062. First posted: June 23, 2020.

Keywords: Hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, Lutetium-177-PSMA, Metastases-directed therapy, Oligometastases, Radioligand therapy, Urologic oncology

Background

Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer in males [1]. Despite surgery or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), between 27% and 53% of patients will have a detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and present with disease recurrence [2]. If there are no curative options, patients with a short PSA doubling time (e.g., <6 months) have a worse prognosis and early androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the treatment of choice [35]. While ADT delays disease progression of patients, it is associated with significant side effects and frequently impairs the quality of life [6]. Therefore, there is an increasing interest in treatments to postpone ADT while maintaining a good quality of life.

Lately, metastases-directed therapy (MDT) (e.g., EBRT) is showing promising efficacy to postpone ADT or cure selected patients with solely low-grade treatment-related side effects. Studies have reported that approximately 30–40% of patients that underwent MDT are still without ADT 5 years post-irradiation [710]. Particularly, patients with a limited number of metastases (≤5 metastases), the so-called oligometastatic prostate cancer, seem to benefit from MDT [7, 9, 11, 12]. Therefore, several pivotal trials are currently investigating MDT in an oligometastatic setting.

All these studies rely on imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET) to detect and target these tumor metastases [1316]. The currently favored PET tracers in prostate cancer are Gallium-68 (68Ga) or Fluor-18 (18F)-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands (PSMA-11, DCFPyL, or PSMA-1007). However, PSMA ligands, such as PSMA-617 & PSMA-I&T, can also be labeled with beta emitters like Lutetium-177 (177Lu) for radioligand therapy to deliver high local radiation doses to tumors directly [1722].

177Lu-labeled PSMA is a promising new therapeutic approach with the pending registry in the 3rd or 4th line castration-resistant prostate cancer [21]. Recently, we showed that 177Lu-PSMA is also highly effective in the hormone-sensitive setting with low volume disease because of high tumor uptake of PSMA targeted radioligands in small lesions, such as oligometastatic prostate cancer [17, 18, 23]. Moreover, the favorable toxicity profile of 177Lu-PSMA seen in our pilot study supports this new treatment in this setting. Therefore, we initiated a prospective randomized multicenter phase II study that evaluates the efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA in oHSPC to postpone disease progression and to avert the need for ADT. This study protocol was published in 2020, but was recently amended. The changes to the protocol are described in the present report [24].

Changes to the protocol

The original protocol was designed using the PSMA ligand PSMA-I&T, which can be labeled with 177Lu in our local laboratory following GMP conditions. Unfortunately, due to COVID-19-related issues (e.g., personnel shortage, remote working, and increased demand for hospital resources), the production of 177Lu-PSMA-I&T for our study did not receive a priority designation in our hospitals. Therefore, the study required a third party for the stable production of 177Lu-PSMA and a logistical party to supply all participating centers. The study will now use 177Lu-PSMA-617 as Advanced Accelerator Applications stepped in for support. The study also received a new title “Lutetium-177-PSMA in Oligo-metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer.”

As some patients may have a residual disease with good PSMA uptake after two cycles of 7.4 GBq 177Lu-PSMA, with no or only low-grade side effects, the present protocol enables an additional two cycles if this is thought beneficial for patients. Thus, patients in the therapeutic arm (or those in the control arm that met the primary endpoint and now receive 177Lu-PSMA) are eligible for another two cycles of 7.4GBq of 177Lu-PSMA given 12 and 18 weeks after cycle one. To evaluate if the residual disease is present after the first two cycles, patients will also undergo an interim 18F-PSMA PET scan 4 weeks (±1 week) after cycle two.

Study progress

Since recruitment began in July 2020, only three patients were included prior to the amendments reported above. One patient was allocated to the therapeutic arm and received two cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-I&T. This patient will be replaced by a new patient under the amended protocol. The two control arm patients will not be replaced and will be eligible to receive 177Lu-PSMA-617 in case they meet the primary endpoint, which is disease progression within 24 weeks post cycle two.

Conclusion

After the publication of the original protocol, the study was amended due to COVID-19-related issues to acquire third-party support for the labeling of the radiopharmaceutical. Therefore, the study will now use 177Lu-PSMA-617 instead of 177Lu-PSMA-I&T. In addition, patients with residual disease on 18F-PSMA PET after the first two cycles are eligible to receive an additional two cycles of 7.4 GBq 177Lu-PSMA in week 12 and week 18 after cycle one, summing up to a maximum of 4 cycles if necessary.

Acknowledgements

We thank all the investigators of the study, the participating study sites, the patients, and their families.

Abbreviations

68Ga

Gallium-68

18F

Fluor-18

177Lu

Lutetium-177

ADT

Androgen deprivation therapy

EBRT

External beam radiotherapy

MDT

Metastases directed therapy

oHSPC

Oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

PET

Positron emission tomography

PSA

Prostate-specific antigen

PSMA

Prostate-specific membrane antigen

Authors’ contributions

JN, AW, WG, DOL, WV, and WN as the principal investigators in different hospitals and departments and BP, MJ, MG, MJ, SM, IO, NM, and JB as the sub-investigators who conceived and designed the study. BP and JN drafted the original study protocol. The authors contributed to the manuscript and approved its submission. All authors are responsible for the daily running of the trial.

Funding

This study is funded by the Prostaatkankerstichting (Dutch prostate cancer foundation) and by Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis Company. The granting will not have any role in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol and the following amendments were approved by the Medical Review Ethics Committee Arnhem-Nijmegen, The Netherlands. All study participants will provide informed consent before study entry.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

JN receives research support from ABX Pharmaceuticals and Advanced Accelerator Applications.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II—2020 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2021;79(2):263–282. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Freedland SJ, Eastham J, Shore N. Androgen deprivation therapy and estrogen deficiency induced adverse effects in the treatment of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2009;12(4):333–338. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2009.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhou P, Chen MH, McLeod D, Carroll PR, Moul JW, D'Amico AV. Predictors of prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(28):6992–6998. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.2906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cornford P, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, De Santis M, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2017;71(4):630–642. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ahmadi H, Daneshmand S. Androgen deprivation therapy: evidence-based management of side effects. BJU Int. 2013;111(4):543–548. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11774.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Deek MP, Taparra K, Dao D, Chan L, Phillips R, Gao RW, Kwon ED, Deville C, Song DY, Greco S, et al. Patterns of recurrence and modes of progression after metastasis-directed therapy in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;109(2):387–395. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ost P, Reynders D, Decaestecker K, Fonteyne V, Lumen N, Bruycker AD, Lambert B, Delrue L, Bultijnck R, Goetghebeur E, et al. Surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence (STOMP): five-year results of a randomized phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(6_suppl):10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.6_suppl.10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, Radwan N, Lim SJ, Antonarakis ES, Rowe SP, Ross AE, Gorin MA, Deville C, Greco SC, Wang H, Denmeade SR, Paller CJ, Dipasquale S, DeWeese TL, Song DY, Wang H, Carducci MA, Pienta KJ, Pomper MG, Dicker AP, Eisenberger MA, Alizadeh AA, Diehn M, Tran PT. Outcomes of observation vs stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer: the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(5):650–659. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Kroeze SGC, Henkenberens C, Vogel MME, Kirste S, Becker J, Burger IA, Derlin T, Bartenstein P, Eiber M, Mix M, la Fougère C, Müller AC, Grosu AL, Combs SE, Christiansen H, Guckenberger M, Belka C. Influence of localization of PSMA-positive oligo-metastases on efficacy of metastasis-directed external-beam radiotherapy-a multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(8):1852–1863. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04708-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ost P, Reynders D, Decaestecker K, Fonteyne V, Lumen N, De Bruycker A, Lambert B, Delrue L, Bultijnck R, Claeys T, et al. Surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence: a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(5):446–453. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tosoian JJ, Gorin MA, Ross AE, Pienta KJ, Tran PT, Schaeffer EM. Oligometastatic prostate cancer: definitions, clinical outcomes, and treatment considerations. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14(1):15–25. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lecouvet FE, Oprea-Lager DE, Liu Y, Ost P, Bidaut L, Collette L, Deroose CM, Goffin K, Herrmann K, Hoekstra OS, Kramer G, Lievens Y, Lopci E, Pasquier D, Petersen LJ, Talbot JN, Zacho H, Tombal B, deSouza NM. Use of modern imaging methods to facilitate trials of metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic disease in prostate cancer: a consensus recommendation from the EORTC Imaging Group. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(10):e534–e545. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30571-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multi-centre study. Lancet. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Schilham MG, Zamecnik P, Privé BM, Israël B, Rijpkema M, Scheenen T, et al. Head-to-head comparison of <sup>68</sup>Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT and ferumoxtran-10 enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2021;jnumed.120.258541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Privé BM, Israël B, Schilham MGM, Muselaers CHJ, Zámecnik P, Mulders PFA, Witjes JA, Sedelaar M, Mehra N, Verzijlbergen F, Janssen MJR, Gotthardt M, Barentsz JO, van Oort IM, Nagarajah J. Evaluating F-18-PSMA-1007-PET in primary prostate cancer and comparing it to multi-parametric MRI and histopathology. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020;24(2):423–430. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00292-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Privé B, Peters S, Muselaers C, Zamecnik P, Janssen M, Scheenen T, et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 in low-volume hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer: a prospective study. 2020;59. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.Peters SMB, Privé BM, de Bakker M, de Lange F, Jentzen W, Eek A, et al. Intra-therapeutic dosimetry of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in low-volume hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer patients and correlation with treatment outcome. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021. 10.1007/s00259-021-05471-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 19.Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, Iravani A, Joshua AM, Goh JC, Pattison DA, Tan TH, Kirkwood ID, Ng S, et al. [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10276):797–804. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00237-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Violet J, Jackson P, Ferdinandus J, Sandhu S, Akhurst T, Iravani A, Kong G, Kumar AR, Thang SP, Eu P, Scalzo M, Murphy D, Williams S, Hicks RJ, Hofman MS. Dosimetry of (177)Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: correlations between pretherapeutic imaging and whole-body tumor dosimetry with treatment outcomes. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(4):517–523. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.219352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, Fizazi K, Herrmann K, Rahbar K, Tagawa ST, Nordquist LT, Vaishampayan N, El-Haddad G, et al. Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1091–1103. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Privé BM, Slootbeek PHJ, Laarhuis BI, Naga SP, van der Doelen MJ, van Kalmthout LWM, et al. Impact of DNA damage repair defects on response to PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021. 10.1038/s41391-021-00424-2. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 23.O'Donoghue JA, Bardies M, Wheldon TE. Relationships between tumor size and curability for uniformly targeted therapy with beta-emitting radionuclides. J Nucl Med. 1995;36(10):1902–1909. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Privé BM, Janssen MJR, van Oort IM, Muselaers CHJ, Jonker MA, de Groot M, Mehra N, Verzijlbergen JF, Scheenen TWJ, Zámecnik P, Barentsz JO, Gotthardt M, Noordzij W, Vogel WV, Bergman AM, van der Poel HG, Vis AN, Oprea-Lager DE, Gerritsen WR, Witjes JA, Nagarajah J. Lutetium-177-PSMA-I&T as metastases directed therapy in oligometastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer, a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07386-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Trials are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES