ABSTRACT
Candida auris is an emerging yeast pathogen of candidemia with the ability to develop resistance to all current antifungal drug classes. Novel antifungal therapies against C. auris are warranted. NSC319726 is a thiosemicarbazone with an inhibitory effect on fungal ribosome biogenesis that has demonstrated some antifungal activity. In this study, we assessed the in vitro activity and in vivo efficacy of NSC319726 against C. auris. NSC319726 was active in vitro against 22 C. auris isolates from different clades, with MICs ranging from 0.125 to 0.25 mg/liter. Despite complete visual growth inhibition, the effect was described as fungistatic in time-kill curves. Interactions with fluconazole, amphotericin B, and micafungin, as tested by the checkerboard dilution method, were described as indifferent. NSC319726 demonstrated significant effects in rescuing G. mellonella larvae infected with two distinct C. auris isolates, compared to the untreated group. In conclusion, NSC319726 demonstrated in vitro activity against C. auris and in vivo efficacy in an invertebrate model of infection. Its potential role as a novel antifungal therapy in humans should be further investigated.
IMPORTANCE Candida auris is emerging as a major public health threat because of its ability to cause nosocomial outbreaks of severe invasive candidiasis. Management of C. auris infection is difficult because of its frequent multidrug-resistant profile for currently licensed antifungals. Here, we show that the thiosemicarbazone NSC319726 was active in vitro against a large collection of C. auris isolates from different clades. Moreover, the drug was well tolerated and effective for the treatment of C. auris infection in an invertebrate model of Galleria mellonella. We conclude that NSC319726 might represent an interesting drug candidate for the treatment of C. auris infection.
KEYWORDS: antifungal resistance, antifungal susceptibility testing, candidiasis, thiosemicarbazone
INTRODUCTION
Candida auris is an emerging yeast pathogen causing nosocomial outbreaks of invasive candidiasis (1–4). Five genetic clades have been identified, with distinct geographical origins, i.e., South Asian (clade I), East Asian (clade II), South African (clade III), South American (clade IV), and Iranian (clade V) (2, 5, 6). Acquired antifungal resistance is a hallmark of C. auris and can affect all three current antifungal classes (azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins) (2). More than 90% of C. auris isolates are resistant to fluconazole, and resistance to two or more antifungal classes is not uncommon (2, 7, 8). Therefore, the development of new antifungal drugs against C. auris is warranted.
NSC319726 is a thiosemicarbazone zinc chelator that inhibits the growth of mammalian cancer cell lines with a p53 mutation (9). This compound also demonstrated antifungal activity against several Candida species, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus fumigatus (10). The aim of this study was to measure the antifungal activity of NSC319726 against a collection of 22 clinical isolates of C. auris, in comparison to standard antifungals, and to assess its efficacy in an invertebrate model of C. auris infection.
RESULTS
MICs obtained by the broth microdilution method (11) are shown in Table 1. The MIC50 and MIC90 values (i.e., values encompassing 50% and 90% of isolates, respectively) for fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and micafungin were >64 and >64 μg/ml (range, 4 to >64 μg/ml), 1 and 2 μg/ml (range, 0.06 to 8 μg/ml), 1 and 2 μg/ml (range, 0.25 to 2 μg/ml), and 0.25 and 0.25 μg/ml (range, 0.125 to >8 μg/ml), respectively. According to the tentative breakpoints of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/c-auris-antifungal.html), 19, 3, and 1 of these 22 isolates were defined as resistant to fluconazole (MIC breakpoint, ≥32 μg/ml), amphotericin B (MIC breakpoint, ≥2 μg/ml), and micafungin (MIC breakpoint, ≥4 μg/ml), respectively.
TABLE 1.
MICs of NSC319726 and standard antifungal drugs against 22 Candida auris clinical isolates
Strain | Clade/origin (reference) | MIC (μg/ml) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fluconazole | Voriconazole | Amphotericin B | Micafungin | NSC319726 | ||
I.2 | I/India (16) | >64 | 1 | 1 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
I.3 | I/Indiaa | >64 | 2 | 1 | >8 | 0.25 |
I.4 | I/India (20) | >64 | 1 | 1 | 0.125 | 0.25 |
II.1 | II/Japan (15) | 4 | 0.0625 | 0.5 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
II.2 | II/Indiaa | 32 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
III.7 | III/Switzerland (17) | >64 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
III.8 | III/Israel (18) | >64 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.125 |
III.9 | III/Israel (18) | >64 | 2 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
IV.1 | IV/Colombia (19) | 4 | 0.0625 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
IV.2 | IV/Colombia (19) | >64 | 1 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.25 |
IV.3 | IV/Colombia (19) | >64 | 1 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
IV.4 | IV/Colombia (19) | >64 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
IV.5 | IV/Colombia (19) | >64 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
IV.6 | IV/Colombia (19) | >64 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
IV.7 | IV/Colombia (19) | >64 | 8 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
IV.8 | IV/Colombia (19) | >64 | 8 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
IV.9 | IV/Israel (18) | 16 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
IV.10 | IV/Israel (18) | 32 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
IV.11 | IV/Israel (18) | 32 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
IV.12 | IV/Israel (18) | 32 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
IV.13 | IV/Israel (18) | 32 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.125 |
IV.14 | IV/Israel (18) | 32 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.25 |
A gift from Maurizio Sanguinetti.
NSC319726 was active against all 22 C. auris strains, with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.25 and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively (range, 0.125 to 0.25 μg/ml) (Table 1). In order to better characterize the antifungal effect of NSC319726, further experiments were performed using two selected isolates from two different clades, i.e., one azole- and echinocandin-susceptible isolate (IV.1) and one azole- and echinocandin-resistant isolate (I.3). Time-kill curves of NSC319726 were determined for these two isolates. Compared to the untreated conditions, exposure to NSC319726 was associated with significant growth inhibition (Fig. 1). The effect of 4× MIC exposure was greater than that of 2× MIC exposure (t test, P = 0.04 at 24 h), but the drug remained only fungistatic, since the log10 CFU per milliliter decrease was <99.9%, compared to the starting inoculum.
FIG 1.
Time-kill curves for NSC319726 against Candida auris isolates I.3 and IV.1. Plots of the log10 CFU/ml of C. auris over the time of drug exposure are shown. The concentration of NSC319726 was equal to 2× or 4× the MIC value of each isolate. Results are the mean of biological duplicates with standard deviations (error bars).
In checkerboard testing, the interactions between NSC319726 and fluconazole, amphotericin B, and micafungin were defined as indifferent, with fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values of 2, 2, and 0.625 and 2, 2, and 2 for isolates IV.1 and I.3, respectively.
The safety and efficacy of NSC319726 were tested in a Galleria mellonella model of C. auris invasive candidiasis. Escalating single doses of NSC319726 up to 24 mg/kg were well tolerated by the uninfected larvae (100% survival until 7 days following injection). Doses of 6 and 12 mg/kg were selected for the G. mellonella model of C. auris infection. NSC319726 was effective in rescuing larvae infected with C. auris I.3 and IV.1 strains, with significantly improved survival rates, compared to the untreated group (Fig. 2). The doses of 6 and 12 mg/kg were equally effective.
FIG 2.
Effects of NSC319726 against C. auris strains I.3 (A) and IV.1 (B) in a Galleria mellonella model of invasive candidiasis. Larvae were infected with 5 × 105 C. auris cells in a volume of 40 μl PBS (except for the uninfected control arms, which were treated with 40 μl PBS alone). Two hours later, larvae were injected with 40 μl of NSC319726 at a concentration of 6 mg/kg or 12 mg/kg or in the absence of drug (PBS alone with an equivalent DMSO concentration, i.e., 0.9%). All arms consisted of 20 larvae, except for the uninfected control arms (n = 10). P values (log-rank test) are expressed for the comparisons between the infected untreated arm and the infected arm treated with 6 mg/kg of NSC319726 and the infected arm treated with 12 mg/kg of NSC319726. *, P values of ≤0.05 were considered significant.
DISCUSSION
NSC319726 is a thiosemicarbazone with zinc-chelating and redox properties that has been investigated for its potential in anticancer therapy and also has demonstrated antibacterial and antifungal activity (9, 10, 12). In Candida albicans, NSC319726 was shown to cripple fungal ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis (10). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production may also contribute to its antifungal effect (10).
In the present study, we showed that NSC319726 was active against a collection of C. auris isolates from different clades, including isolates with presumed resistance to the current antifungal classes. The MIC range of NSC319726 against C. auris (0.125 to 0.25 μg/ml) was similar to those previously reported for other Candida spp. (10). Although 100% growth inhibition was observed in broth microdilution assays, time-kill curves showed that the antifungal effect of NSC319726 was fungistatic at concentrations up to 4 times the MIC value. In contrast, Sun et al. reported a fungicidal effect against C. albicans (10). They also described synergistic interactions of NSC319726 with fluconazole and caspofungin against C. albicans (10), while we observed indifferent interactions with all three antifungal drug classes against two C. auris isolates. Finally, we showed that NSC319726 was well tolerated and effective at 6 and 12 mg/kg to treat invasive C. auris infection in an invertebrate model of G. mellonella. It is noteworthy that, despite a significant impact on survival rates, compared to the untreated group, the rates of survival of the larvae at 72 h after a single injection of NSC319726 were relatively low (30 to 40%). This excessive mortality rate could be due to the persistence of residual fungal growth and infection because of the merely fungistatic effect of the drug. Other animal models (e.g., infections in mice) should be used to assess whether better survival rates could be achieved with repeated dosing. NSC319726 showed minimal toxicity in mice at a dosage of 5 mg/kg/day and in vitro in human liver cell lines (9, 10), which is encouraging for further investigations regarding the potential clinical perspectives on this drug.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
NSC319726 and micafungin (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX) and fluconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were obtained as powders and diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for stock solutions of 10 mg/ml for fluconazole and NSC319726 and 1 mg/ml for the other drugs.
Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed in duplicate by the broth microdilution method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) procedure (11). Testing was performed in 96-well U-shaped-well plates, with each well containing a final concentration of 2 × 103 CFU per ml in 200 μl of RPMI 1640 medium with 0.2% glucose and glutamine and without bicarbonate, buffered with 0.165 M 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) to pH 7, including a control well (no drug) and wells containing the drug at the desired concentration (the ranges of concentrations with doubling dilutions were 0.125 to 64 μg/ml for fluconazole, 0.03 to 16 μg/ml for voriconazole and amphotericin B, 0.015 to 8 μg/ml for micafungin, and 0.015 to 16 μg/ml for NSC319726). Plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 h before reading. MICs were defined as the concentrations achieving 100% growth inhibition (i.e., no residual growth, by visual inspection) for amphotericin B and NSC319726 and ≥50% inhibition for micafungin, fluconazole, and voriconazole. For each drug, the MIC50 and MIC90 were defined as the concentrations at which 50% and 90% of the isolates, respectively, were inhibited.
Time-kill curves were determined as described previously (13). Strains were grown overnight in liquid yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YEPD). The suspension was diluted to a concentration of 105 CFU/ml in 10 ml RPMI 1640 medium and incubated under constant agitation (220 rpm) at 37°C in the absence of drug and in the presence of NSC319726 at concentrations of 2× and 4× MIC. For each time point (0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h), aliquots of 100 μl were diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 10 μl was spread on YEPD agar plates. CFU were counted after 24 to 48 h of incubation at 37°C. The experiment was performed in biological and technical duplicates.
Drug interactions between NSC319726 and fluconazole, amphotericin B, and micafungin were tested by checkerboard dilution to determine the FICI, as described previously (14). Synergism, indifference, and antagonism were defined as FICI values of ≤0.5, >0.5 to 4, and >4, respectively.
For the invertebrate model, Galleria mellonella larvae (BioSystems Technology Ltd., University of Exeter, Exeter, UK) weighing 300 to 400 mg were used. The tolerability of escalating doses of NSC319726 (3, 6, 12, and 24 mg/kg) was assessed in groups of 5 larvae in order to determine the optimal dosage. For the invasive candidiasis model, groups of 20 larvae were injected with 40 μl PBS solution containing 5 × 105 cells of the C. auris strain I.3 or IV.1 or with PBS alone (control groups of 10 larvae). Two hours later, larvae were injected with 40 μl PBS containing 6 mg/kg or 12 mg/kg NSC319726 or without the drug (i.e., with an equivalent concentration [0.9%] of DMSO). Larvae were kept in the dark at 37°C and monitored for survival three times daily up to 72 h. Data were analyzed by the log-rank test (GraphPad Prism software).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Marie-Elisabeth Bougnoux from Institut Pasteur (Paris, France), Maurizio Sanguinetti from Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Rome, Italy), Judith Berman and Ronen Ben-Ami from Tel Aviv University (Tel Aviv, Israel), Guillermo Garcia-Effron from Universidad Nacional del Litoral (Santa Fe de la Vera Cruz, Argentina), Nicolas Papon from Angers University (Angers, France), and Arnaud Riat from Geneva University Hospital (Geneva, Switzerland) for providing us with all of the Candida auris strains in this study.
This work was supported by a research grant from the Santos-Suarez Foundation.
F.L. received research grants from The Swiss National Science Foundation, Novartis, MSD, and Pfizer outside the submitted work and speaker honoraria from Gilead.
Contributor Information
Frederic Lamoth, Email: frederic.lamoth@chuv.ch.
Teresa R. O'Meara, University of Michigan
REFERENCES
- 1.Eyre DW, Sheppard AE, Madder H, Moir I, Moroney R, Quan TP, Griffiths D, George S, Butcher L, Morgan M, Newnham R, Sunderland M, Clarke T, Foster D, Hoffman P, Borman AM, Johnson EM, Moore G, Brown CS, Walker AS, Peto TEA, Crook DW, Jeffery KJM. 2018. A Candida auris outbreak and its control in an intensive care setting. N Engl J Med 379:1322–1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1714373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lockhart SR, Etienne KA, Vallabhaneni S, Farooqi J, Chowdhary A, Govender NP, Colombo AL, Calvo B, Cuomo CA, Desjardins CA, Berkow EL, Castanheira M, Magobo RE, Jabeen K, Asghar RJ, Meis JF, Jackson B, Chiller T, Litvintseva AP. 2017. Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses. Clin Infect Dis 64:134–140. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schelenz S, Hagen F, Rhodes JL, Abdolrasouli A, Chowdhary A, Hall A, Ryan L, Shackleton J, Trimlett R, Meis JF, Armstrong-James D, Fisher MC. 2016. First hospital outbreak of the globally emerging Candida auris in a European hospital. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 5:35. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0132-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ruiz-Gaitan A, Moret AM, Tasias-Pitarch M, Aleixandre-Lopez AI, Martinez-Morel H, Calabuig E, Salavert-Lleti M, Ramirez P, Lopez-Hontangas JL, Hagen F, Meis JF, Mollar-Maseres J, Peman J. 2018. An outbreak due to Candida auris with prolonged colonisation and candidaemia in a tertiary care European hospital. Mycoses 61:498–505. doi: 10.1111/myc.12781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chow NA, de Groot T, Badali H, Abastabar M, Chiller TM, Meis JF. 2019. Potential fifth clade of Candida auris, Iran, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis 25:1780–1781. doi: 10.3201/eid2509.190686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lamoth F, Kontoyiannis DP. 2018. The Candida auris alert: facts and perspectives. J Infect Dis 217:516–520. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chowdhary A, Sharma C, Meis JF. 2017. Candida auris: a rapidly emerging cause of hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant fungal infections globally. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006290. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ostrowsky B, Greenko J, Adams E, Quinn M, O'Brien B, Chaturvedi V, Berkow E, Vallabhaneni S, Forsberg K, Chaturvedi S, Lutterloh E, Blog D, C. auris Investigation Work Group. 2020. Candida auris isolates resistant to three classes of antifungal medications: New York, 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69:6–9. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6901a2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yu X, Vazquez A, Levine AJ, Carpizo DR. 2012. Allele-specific p53 mutant reactivation. Cancer Cell 21:614–625. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.03.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sun N, Li D, Zhang Y, Killeen K, Groutas W, Calderone R. 2017. Repurposing an inhibitor of ribosomal biogenesis with broad anti-fungal activity. Sci Rep 7:17014. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17147-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2017. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, 4th ed. CLSI document M27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sadaka C, Damborg P, Watts JL. 2018. High-throughput screen identifying the thiosemicarbazone NSC319726 compound as a potent antimicrobial lead against resistant strains of Escherichia coli. Biomolecules 8:166. doi: 10.3390/biom8040166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Klepser ME, Wolfe EJ, Jones RN, Nightingale CH, Pfaller MA. 1997. Antifungal pharmacodynamic characteristics of fluconazole and amphotericin B tested against Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:1392–1395. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.6.1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Odds FC. 2003. Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them. J Antimicrob Chemother 52:1. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Satoh K, Makimura K, Hasumi Y, Nishiyama Y, Uchida K, Yamaguchi H. 2009. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol Immunol 53:41–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2008.00083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sharma C, Kumar N, Meis JF, Pandey R, Chowdhary A. 2015. Draft genome sequence of a fluconazole-resistant Candida auris strain from a candidemia patient in India. Genome Announc 3:e00722-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00722-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Riat A, Neofytos D, Coste A, Harbarth S, Bizzini A, Grandbastien B, Pugin J, Lamoth F. 2018. First case of Candida auris in Switzerland: discussion about preventive strategies. Swiss Med Wkly 148:w14622. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ben-Ami R, Berman J, Novikov A, Bash E, Shachor-Meyouhas Y, Zakin S, Maor Y, Tarabia J, Schechner V, Adler A, Finn T. 2017. Multidrug-Resistant Candida haemulonii and C. auris, Tel Aviv, Israel. Emerg Infect Dis 23:195–203. doi: 10.3201/eid2302.161486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Theill L, Dudiuk C, Morales-Lopez S, Berrio I, Rodriguez JY, Marin A, Gamarra S, Garcia-Effron G. 2018. Single-tube classical PCR for Candida auris and Candida haemulonii identification. Rev Iberoam Micol 35:110–112. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2018.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chowdhary A, Sharma C, Duggal S, Agarwal K, Prakash A, Singh PK, Jain S, Kathuria S, Randhawa HS, Hagen F, Meis JF. 2013. New clonal strain of Candida auris, Delhi, India. Emerg Infect Dis 19:1670–1673. doi: 10.3201/eid1910.130393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.