Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Nov 4;10(44):e00686-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00686-21

Draft Genome Sequence of the Lichenized Fungus Bacidia gigantensis

Jessica L Allen a, Steven J M Jones b, R Troy McMullin c,
Editor: Antonis Rokasd
PMCID: PMC8567793  PMID: 34734769

ABSTRACT

The draft genome sequence of Bacidia gigantensis, a lichenized fungus in the order Lecanorales, was sequenced directly from a herbarium specimen collected from the type locality at Sleeping Giant Provincial Park in Ontario, Canada. Using long-read sequencing on the Oxford Nanopore PromethION platform, we assembled a nearly complete genome sequence.

ANNOUNCEMENT

We sequenced the genome of Bacidia gigantensis, a crustose, epiphytic, lichenized fungus in the family Ramalinaceae. The species was recently described as new to science from Sleeping Giant Provincial Park along the north shore of Lake Superior in Ontario, Canada (1). A whole lichen specimen was collected at the type locality (1), and DNA was extracted from whole thallus material. The tissue was disrupted using metal bead-based homogenization; proteins were pelleted via centrifugation and the DNA-containing supernatant drawn off. Then, multiple ethanol washes were conducted over a silica column. All steps followed a protocol similar to those for commercially available kits (2). Bead cleanup at a 0.6:1 bead-to-sample ratio was first performed to remove small DNA fragments using PCR Clean DX C-1003-450 (Aline Biosciences, Woburn, MA, USA). The quality of the genomic DNA (gDNA) was assessed using pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with 1% agarose gel by running with 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) on a CHEF pulse field gel apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) for 22 h. The library construction and sequencing were conducted following Oxford Nanopore’s genomic DNA by ligation (SQK-LSK109) protocol. Briefly, 1.14 μg of genomic DNA was formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) repaired, end-prepped, and dA-tailed using the NEBNext FFPE DNA repair mix (M6630) and the NEBNext Ultra II end prep/dA-tailing module (E7546). NEBNext quick ligase (E6056S) was used to ligate the Oxford Nanopore adapters. A final size selection using a 0.4:1 bead-to-library ratio was performed to select against smaller molecules. Then, 380 ng of the final library was loaded onto a PromethION 24 instrument using the R9.4.1 pore flow cell and v19.06.9 software (MinKNOW graphical user interface [GUI] v4.0.23). Sequencing was run for 72 h. Base calling was performed using Fast-Bonito v0.2.2 (https://github.com/nanoporetech/bonito). The N50 value of the reads was 26 kb. A total of 14,958,030 reads containing 32 Gbp were generated.

The reads were corrected using Canu v2.0 (3); they were then assembled using Flye v2.8.2 with “--pacbio-hifi” mode, the option “--hifi-error 0.006,” and using the purge_haplotigs tool to remove duplicated disjointigs between the “consensus” and “repeat” stages of the Flye assembly pipeline (4, 5). The assembly was polished by mapping all of the reads to the assembly using Minimap2 v2.17, then implementing one round of Racon v1.4.17 polishing and one round of Medaka v1.2 polishing (6) (https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka). To remove nontarget organism sequences from the assembly, we used a Diamond v0.9.32 blastx search against the NCBI nonredundant protein database to assign the taxa to each scaffold, then built an annotated GC depth plot using the BITAT python script from McKenzie et al. (7) (https://github.com/biorover/LethariaGenomes). We then kept only scaffolds with 70× to 80× coverage and a GC content below 0.6 that were annotated as Ascomycota, as was the Bacidia gigantensis genome. We used QUAST v5.0.2 to evaluate the final metrics for the assembly. The assembly was highly contiguous and comprised 24 scaffolds, with a total length of 33.12 Mb, with an N50 value of 18.1 Mb and an L50 value of 8 Mb (8). The genome sequence was also highly complete, with a BUSCO v3.1 homology search against the Pezizomycotina database, resulting in 92.7% complete single-copy genes, 0.5% duplicate single-copy genes, 2.6% incomplete genes, and 4.6% missing genes (9).

We used Funannotate v1.8.7 for gene prediction in the nuclear genome using all default evidence-guided and ab initio predictors (https://github.com/nextgenusfs/funannotate). We first masked the repeat regions, which comprised 7.69% of the genome. Protein evidence was derived from the Joint Genome Institute database for the following accessions: Cladonia grayi Cgr/DA2myc/ss v2.0, Lobaria pulmonaria Scotland reference genome v1.0, Usnea florida ATCC 18376 v1.0, and Xanthoria parietina 46-1-SA22 v1.1. Aspergillus fumigatus was selected as the seed species for BUSCO searches. A total of 14,923 valid annotations were compiled, and all genome statistics are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Summary statistics for the Bacidia gigantensis genome assembly and annotation

Characteristica Value
Total assembly length (Mb) 33.12
No. of scaffolds 24
N50 (Mb) 18.1
L 50 8
No. of complete single-copy BUSCOs (%) 1,186 (92.7)
No. of duplicate single-copy BUSCOs (%) 1 (0.5)
No. of incomplete BUSCOs (%) 35 (2.6)
No. of missing BUSCOs (%) 35 (4.6)
% repeat 7.69
%GC 44.67
No. of tRNAs 51
No. of Phobius secretome genes 931
No. of Phobius transmembrane proteins 1,798
No. of antiSMASH biosynthetic gene clusters 35
No. of antiSMASH biosynthetic enzymes 78
No. of antiSMASH smCOGs 103
No. of CAZYmes 205
Total no. of annotations 14,923
NCBI BioProject accession no. PRJNA748063
Sequence Read Archive accession no. SRX11510989
GenBank assembly accession no. GCA_019456465.1
a

BUSCOs, benchmarking universal single-copy orthologs; smCOGs, secondary metabolism clusters of orthologous groups; CAZYmes, carbohydrate-active enzymes.

Data availability.

All data are available under the National Center for Biotechnology Information BioProject accession number PRJNA748063. The raw reads are available under the Sequence Read Archive accession number SRX11510989; the assembled nuclear genome sequence is available under the GenBank assembly accession number GCA_019456465.1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Funding for the sequencing was supported, in part, through the CanSeq150 program of Canada’s Genomics Enterprise (https://www.cgen.ca/). Partial support for J.L.A. came from the U.S. National Science Foundation (Division of Environmental Biology award number 2115191).

We acknowledge the technical expertise of the scientists at Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre in the generation of the DNA sequence data. We also thank Roger Bull and Anna Ginter for extracting the DNA.

Contributor Information

R. Troy McMullin, Email: tmcmullin@nature.ca.

Antonis Rokas, Vanderbilt University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.McMullin RT, McCune M, Lendemer JC. 2020. Bacidia gigantensis (Ramalinaceae), a new species with homosekikaic acid from the north shore of Lake Superior in Ontario, Canada. Bryologist 123:215–224. doi: 10.1639/0007-2745-123.2.215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alexander PJ, Rajanikanth G, Bacon CD, Bailey CD. 2006. Recovery of plant DNA using a reciprocating saw and silica-based columns. Mol Ecol Notes 7:5–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01549.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Roach MJ, Schmidt SA, Borneman AR. 2018. Purge Haplotigs: allelic contig reassignment for third-gen diploid genome assemblies. BMC Bioinformatics 19:460. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2485-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner P. 2019. Assembly of long error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vaser R, Sović I, Nagarajan N, Šikić M. 2017. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res 27:737–746. doi: 10.1101/gr.214270.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McKenzie SK, Walston RF, Allen JL. 2020. Complete, high-quality genomes from long-read metagenomic sequencing of two wolf lichen thalli reveals enigmatic genome architecture. Genomics 112:3150–3156. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Seppey M, Manni M, Zdobnov EM. 2019. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. Methods Mol Biol 1962:227–245. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available under the National Center for Biotechnology Information BioProject accession number PRJNA748063. The raw reads are available under the Sequence Read Archive accession number SRX11510989; the assembled nuclear genome sequence is available under the GenBank assembly accession number GCA_019456465.1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES