Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem B. 2021 May 11;125(19):4977–4986. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c00335

Structural Heterogeneity of Human Histone H2A.1

Khoa N Pham , Yasir Mamun , Francisco Fernandez-Lima †,‖,*
PMCID: PMC8568062  NIHMSID: NIHMS1748516  PMID: 33974801

Abstract

Histones are highly basic chromatin proteins that tightly package and order eukaryotic DNA into nucleosomes. While the atomic structure of the nucleosomes has been determined, the three-dimensional structure of DNA-free histones remains unresolved. Here, we combine tandem non-linear and linear ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS-TIMS) coupled to mass spectrometry in parallel with molecular modeling to study the conformational space of a DNA-free histone H2A type 1 (H2A.1). Experimental results showed the dependence of the gas-phase structures with the starting solution conditions, characterized by charge state distributions, mobility distributions, and collision-induced-unfolding (CIU) pathways. The measured H2A.1 gas-phase structures showed a high diversity of structural features ranging from compact to partially folded, and then highly elongated conformations. Molecular dynamic simulations provided candidate structures for the solution H2A.1 native conformation with folded N- and C-terminal tails, as well as gas-phase candidate structures associated with the mobility trends. Complementary CCS and dipole calculations showed that the charge distribution in the case of elongated gas-phase structures, where basic and acidic residues are mostly exposed (e.g., z > 15+), is sufficient to induce differences in the dipole alignment at high electric fields, in good agreement with the trends observed during the FAIMS-TIMS experiments.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1748516-f0006.jpg


Histones play important roles in eukaryotic biology as they regulate the accessibility of DNA during the cellular processes1 including transcription,2 DNA replication,1 DNA repair and recombination.3 Histones are highly basic chromatin proteins that tightly package and order eukaryotic DNA into nucleosomes, the fundamental units of chromatin.4 A nucleosome consists of an octameric core histone comprised of a tetramer of histones H3 and H4, as well as two dimers of histones H2A and H2B45 with approximately 147 base pairs of DNA wrapped around the histone complex.46 Nucleosomes are then connected by a DNA segment associated with a linker histone (H1 or H5) to form chromatin fibers.6 All members of core histones contain a solvent accessible, unstructured N-terminal tail. Among core histone members, only H2A possesses a C-terminal tail protruding out of the nucleosome core particle.7 These accessible N- and C-terminal tails are highly subject to post-translational modifications (PTMs),8 directly impacting the DNA wrapping and chromatin regulation.1, 8 Aberrant epigenetic regulations as a result of alterations in the patterns of histone PTMs have been associated with early events in cancer910 and other diseases.11 During cellular metabolism, newly synthesized histones are transported to the nucleus by chaperones for replacement of old and/or damaged histones.5 Determination of structures for DNA-free histones is crucial for elucidating the function of various histones and nucleosome dynamics.5, 12 While the atomic structure of nucleosomes has been determined by X-ray crystallography4 and cryo-electron microscopy,13 the three-dimensional structure of DNA-free histones remains unresolved. Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) has been established as a powerful tool for structural biology, particularly when complemented with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.1418 The capability to compare experimental ion mobilities (K) with theoretical calculations based on candidate structures makes IMS a powerful structural probe.1516, 1820 Several studies have shown the potential of non-linear IMS (i.e., field asymmetric IMS, FAIMS) to separate molecular ions based on differences in mobility (ΔK) at low and high electric fields.2124 On the other hand, linear IMS permits the measurement of the rotationally averaged CCS.2526 In particular, trapped IMS (TIMS) has shown several advantages due to its small form factor, high mobility resolution, and wide mobility range to study structural features of biomolecules.2732

Here, tandem non-linear and linear IMS coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometer (FAIMS-TIMS-TOF MS) in parallel with molecular modeling was used to study the DNA-free human histone H2A.1. The influence of the starting solvent condition (native vs. denatured) on the gas-phase structural diversity of H2A.1 is proved using FAIMS-TIMS-TOF MS and collision-induced-unfolding experiments. This is the first FAIMS-TIMS-TOF MS analysis of an intact histone that provides complementary information based on the structural dipole alignment in the FAIMS stage and CCS measurements in the TIMS stage as a function of the charge state. Molecular simulations were utilized to propose a DNA-free native solution structure and gas-phase candidate structures to interpret the trends observed during the FAIMS-TIMS-MS and CIU-TIMS-MS experiments.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Materials and Reagents.

Recombinant human histone H2A.1 (accession number: P0C0S8) was purchased from EpiCypher (Durham, NC). All solvents used in this study were analytical grade or better and purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). Low concentration Tuning Mix standard (G1969–85000) was purchased from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA) and used as received. Stock H2A.1 was prepared in ultrapure water and extensively dialyzed against 10 mM NH4Ac buffer solution for ~ 36 h with a buffer exchange every ~ 12 h. The native and denatured H2A.1 samples were prepared by diluting concentrated histone stock to 10 μM in 10 mM aqueous NH4Ac and 10 μM in 50 mM aqueous NH4Ac, and in methanol:water:formic acid (v/v 50:49:1), respectively.

nESI-FAIMS-TIMS-TOF MS Instrument.

A custom-built nano electrospray ionization (nESI) FAIMS-TIMS-TOF MS instrument was utilized (Figure 1). The system consists of a “dome” FAIMS3335 unit orthogonally attached to the source region of a custom built TIMS-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics Inc., MA).3637

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic of the online nESI-FAIMS-TIMS-TOF MS platform. The FAIMS carrier gas is denoted in blue.

Ions were generated using a nESI emitter supported by a XYZ stage. Emitters were made from a quartz capillary (o.d. = 1.0 mm) using a P2000 laser puller (Sutter Instruments Co., Novato, CA). The curtain plate and nESI emitter voltages were 1.0 and 2.4 kV, respectively. Ions enter the “dome” FAIMS via a 1.5 mm circular hole on the curtain plate on the side of the external electrode. The N2 carrier gas was supplied to the curtain orifice by a digital flowmeter (MKS Instruments) at 2 L/min; a GC filter (Agilent, RMSN-4) was used.

The “dome” FAIMS unit consists of two co-axial, nested cylindrical electrodes with an annular gap width (gc) of 2 mm, an axial gap (gH) of 2.4 mm at the hemispherical terminus, and an outlet aperture of 1 mm at the center.3839 The FAIMS unit is coupled to the capillary inlet (0.5 mm i.d.) of the TIMS-TOF MS platform using a PEEK adapter with ~ 0.5 mm air gap for electrical insulation and discharge of excess carrier gas.39 The “dome” cylindrical FAIMS system was operated by a custom control unit outputting a bi-sinusoidal waveform with a 2:1 harmonic ratio, 1 MHz frequency, and amplitude (dispersion voltage, DV) of 4 kV in negative polarity mode applied to the inner electrode (GAA Custom Electronics, LLC). The compensation voltage (CV) scan rate (SrFAIMS) was 1.0 V/min; the CV is expressed as compensation field EC = CV/g. To avoid potential ion activation at the FAIMS-TIMS interface, the FAIMS exit was biased at the same voltage as the TIMS-TOF MS inlet capillary.

The nESI-FAIMS-TIMS-TOF MS measurements were carried out using N2 as a buffer gas at constant velocity defined by the pressure difference between the funnel entrance (P1 = 2.6 mbar) and exit (P2 = 1.1 mbar) at ca. 300 K.3637 The TIMS radio frequency (rf) voltage was 250 Vpp at a frequency of 880 kHz. To avoid potential ion activation prior to the mobility analysis, “soft” ion transmission and trapping conditions were maintained in all experiments.31, 40 A voltage difference (ΔV) between 10 to 20 V was kept between the deflector (Vdef) and funnel entrance (Vfun), as well as between the funnel entrance and the TIMS analyzer (Vramp). A Vdef of −140V, a Vfun of −160V, a base voltage (Vout) of 60V, and a Vramp of −180V to −20V were used for all measurements. The TIMS scan rate (SrTIMS) was set at 1.6 V/ms.

The TIMS analyzer is comprised of a stack of segmented ring convex electrodes.41 The TIMS cell is controlled using an in-house software, written in LabVIEW (National Instruments), and synchronized with the TOF MS acquisition program. The TIMS analyzer can be operated in “transmission” mode where ions are continually pushed downstream without trapping, or in “IMS” mode where ions are trapped in the analyzer tunnel and eluted with their respective mobility by changing the electric field. The eluted ions are then transferred into the TOF MS for mass separation and detection. Reference FAIMS-TOF MS spectra were collected with TIMS operating in transmission mode (without trapping) and reference TIMS-TOF MS spectra were collected with the FAIMS unit detached. The 4-D FAIMS-TIMS-TOF MS data were acquired by summing the TIMS-MS spectra (~100 spectra) every 0.9 V/cm over the EC = −15 to 85 V/cm range. Data were processed using Data Analysis 5.0 (Bruker Daltonics Inc., Billerica, MA) and Microcal Origin 7.0. (OriginLab, Northampton, MA).

In a TIMS device, the reduced mobility (K0) of a given ion is directly related to the gas velocity (vg) and can be extracted from the electric field (E) at which the ion package elutes.42 In practice, K0 can be calculated from the elution voltage at which the ion package elutes (Ve) and the base voltage applied to the last electrode (Vout) via the expression (1):

K0=vgEAVeVout (1)

where A is a calibration constant determined using standards with known mobility. The Tuning Mix ions m/z 622.029 (1/K0 = 0.985 Vs/cm2), 922.009 (1/K0 = 1.190 Vs/cm2), 1221.991 (1/K0 = 1.382 Vs/cm2), and 1821.952 (1/K0 = 1.729 Vs/cm2) were used for calibration following the procedure described previously.26, 42 The K0 of an ion is correlated to the CCS (Ω) via the Mason-Schamp equation:43

Ω=(18π)1216z(kBT)12[1mI+1mb]121K01N (2)

where z is the charge of the ion, kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is temperature, N* is the bath gas number density, and mI and mb are the masses of the molecular ion and the bath gas, respectively.26, 42

CIU experiments were performed by activating the ions prior to the TIMS analyzer region with 20 V intervals by varying Vfun from −210 V to −30 V, while adjusting the deflector and the entrance funnel voltages accordingly.29 The CIU data were analyzed using CIU Suite 2 software.44

Classical Molecular Dynamics (CMD) Simulations.

The procedure for CMD simulations was carried out as previously described.45 The CMD simulations were performed in explicit solvent, all-atom simulations at 310 K. The H2A.1 structure was solvated using the VMD package46 with a TIP3P water box cutoff set to 10 Å. The initial H2A.1 structure was constructed on COOT,47 using the high resolution (1.9 Å) X-ray structure of Xenopus laevis nucleosome core particle (chain C, PDB entry: 1KX5).4 The solvated system was electrically neutralized by adding 150 mM of NaCl randomly in the bulk water using the autoionize plugin in VMD. The CMD simulations were run using NAMD 2.14 (NVIDIA CUDA acceleration)48 with the CHARMM36 force field.49 The long range interactions were treated with particle mesh using the Ewald method with a 12 Å nonbonded cutoff.50 Energy minimizations (500,000 steps) were performed using the conjugate gradient and line search algorithm, followed by heating at 1 K/ps from 0 to 310 K. After reaching 310 K, a 100 ps equilibration step with 1 fs integration time step in the NVT ensemble was performed using Langevin dynamics to maintain the temperature at 310 K. The production run of 355 ns was performed in the NPT ensemble at 1 atm and 310 K with Langevin coupling and a 2 fs integration time step. Trajectory files were saved every 10 ps for analysis.

Simulated Annealing Molecular Dynamics (SAMD) Simulations.

Gas phase SAMD simulations were performed as described previously.16, 51 Since the N- and C-terminal tails of the nucleosome-bound H2A.1 X-ray structure (chain C, PDB entry: 1KX5)4 were posed in an extended conformation, this structure may not represent the most folded conformation of H2A.1. Alternatively, an initial conformation with the smallest radius of gyration value obtained from the CMD (Rgyr = 15.0 Å, conformation I in Figure 4) was used as the starting structure for SAMD simulations. To ensure oversampling of total conformation spaces, SAMD simulations were performed for 225 cycles with the temperature ramping between T1 (300 K) and T2 (800 K): 20 ps relaxation at T1, 2 ps heating to T2, 20 ps relaxation at T2, 2 ps cooling to T1, 1 ps minimization, and 20 K increment between T1 and T2. The production run was performed in the NVT ensemble with a 1 fs integration time step. The trajectory structures were stored at every 0.5 ps for further analysis.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Molecular modeling. (a) Amino acid sequence of H2A.1. Residues corresponding to α-helices, β-sheets, 310-helices, the N- and C-terminal regions are denoted. (b) Radius of gyration (Rgyr) as a function of CMD simulation time. The snapshots of native dynamics of H2A.1 are labeled from A to I. Residues corresponding to salt-bridges are indicated. (c) Depiction of potential unfolding pathways based on SAMD and SMD simulations.

Steered Molecular Dynamics (SMD) Simulations.

Details on the gas phase SMD simulations can be found elsewhere.52 The highly elongated conformations of H2A.1 were created by pulling the center of mass of the α-carbons of residue S at position 1 (S1) on the N-terminus at a rate of 0.25 Å/ns for 100 ns, while anchoring residue K at position 129 (K129) on the C-terminus. The production run was performed in the NVT ensemble with a 2 fs integration time step. The trajectory structures were stored at every 0.2 ps for further analysis.

Theoretical CCS Calculation and Cluster Analysis.

The basic concepts of theoretical CCS calculations53 and cluster analysis were described previously.16, 54 The trajectory method (TM) in the IMoS v.1.10b5558 was utilized to calculate all theoretical CCS values in N2 gas (™CCSN2).59 Candidate structures are classified based on the comparison of root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) for all structures and classified into clusters.16, 54 The statistical processing codes54 written in R (https://www.r-project.org) was used in this work. Once candidates from the cluster families were determined, charge assignment was performed by scoring the relative solvent accessibility (RSA) of basic and acidic residues in H2A.1.60 The dipole moments of individual candidate structures were computed using YASARA software (www.yasara.org). Finally, all the structural models were displayed using PyMOL (Schrodinger, Inc.).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

nESI-FAIMS-TIMS-TOF MS.

Typical MS projections of H2A.1 using native (10 mM NH4Ac and 50 mM NH4Ac) and denaturing starting solutions (organic content) acquired using the nESI-TIMS-TOF MS configuration are shown in Figures 2 and S1, respectively. The MS of native H2A.1 exhibits a wide charge state distribution (CSD), with a shift towards high charge states as the ammonium salt content decreases and the organic content increases, which suggests “solution memory effects” during the transition from solution to the gas phase. The increase in the relative abundance of higher charge states with the addition of organic content to the starting solution has been suggested to be caused by molecular rearrangements leading to the exposure of basic residues in the solution, and during the ion formation process (e.g., changes in the droplet surface tension during the nESI process).30 When compared with the MS distribution obtained using the tandem FAIMS-TIMS-MS configuration (Figures S1b, S1c, S1d, and S1e), it was observed that there is a dependence in the ion transmission using the FAIMS stage, skewing the original charge state distribution. The CCS profiles for native H2A.1 using 10 mM and 50 mM NH4Ac (Figure S1f) using the nESI-TIMS-TOF MS configuration showed no differences; however, considering the better nESI intensity observed for the 10 mM NH4Ac solution, this was utilized for the native FAIMS-TIMS experiments.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a, b) TIMS-MS mass spectra of H2A.1 in 10 mM NH4Ac and denaturing starting solution, (c, d) CCS profiles acquired using TIMS-MS (blue traces) and FAIMS-TIMS-MS (red traces), (e, f) EC profiles acquired in FAIMS-MS (black traces) and FAIMS-TIMS-MS (red traces), (g, h) 2-D FAIMS-TIMS palettes for selected charge states. The (a, c, e, g) and (b, d, f, h) plots correspond to native and denatured starting conditions, respectively. Data were acquired using “soft” TIMS ion injection settings with SrTIMS = 1.6 V/ms and SrFAIMS = 1.0 V/min. All charge states for the 2D FAIMS-TIMS are shown in SI.

A comparison of CCS profiles for native and denatured H2A.1 acquired using “soft” ion injection (ΔVTIMS = 20 V) conditions using the nESI-TIMS-TOF MS (blue traces) and nESI-FAIMS-TIMS-TOF MS (red traces) are shown in Figures 2c and 2d for typical charged states (full profiles are shown in Figures S2b and S3b). Inspection of the native TIMS-MS CCS profiles (blue traces, Figures 2c and S2b) showed an increase in the CCS with the charge state, with multiple bands observed per charge state for most of the intermediates and higher charge states. For example, the CCS profiles of z = 6+ and 7+ exhibit a narrow CCS band centered at 1600 and 1658 Å2, respectively; these bands are likely related to compact-like (C) conformations. For z = 8+, the CCS profile displayed a major band centered at ~ 1734 Å2 and a minor band at ~ 2080 Å2, indicating the coexistence of C-like structures. The CCS profiles of z = 9+ to 16+ displayed many CCS bands; these correspond to partially unfolded (P) structures. The CCS profiles of z = 17+ to 20+ displayed a narrow band centered at ~ 3670, 4017, 4129, and 4238 Å2, respectively; these correspond to elongated (E) structures. The FAIMS-TIMS-MS CCS profiles of native H2A.1 are shown in Figure 2c and S2b (red traces). The CCS profile of z = 6+ was not shown due to low ion transmission. For z = 7+ and 8+, the CCS profiles were close to those obtained using the nESI-TIMS-MS configuration under low energy ion injection conditions. The CCS profiles for z = 9+ to 16+ followed the established pattern of TIMS-MS with a transition from C- to P-like structures. Closer inspection of z = 9+ and 10+ revealed differences in the CCS profiles between TIMS-MS and FAIMS-TIMS-MS (Figure 2c). For example, the CCS profile for z = 9+ was broader and shifted to a higher CCS when using FAIMS-TIMS-MS. Moreover, the CCS profiles for z = 10+ were significantly different: a narrow CCS band with a higher CCS value (~ 2345 Å2) was observed when using FAIMS-TIMS-MS. This indicates a subtle unfolding induced by ion heating in the FAIMS stage consistent with previous reports.21, 61 For higher charge states (z = 17+ to 20+), no differences in the CCS profiles were observed when adding the FAIMS stage.

The CCS profiles of denatured H2A.1 acquired using TIMS-MS and FAIMS-TIMS-MS (Figures 2d and S3b) displayed differences when compared to those of native H2A.1. This further suggests that H2A.1 gas-phase structures have “solution memory effects” during the transition from solution to the gas phase, not just evidenced by changes in the CSD but also by changes in the mobility profiles (number of bands and CCS values). For example, the CCS profiles of z = 6+, 7+, and 8+ exhibited narrow CCS bands at ~ 1615, 1665, and 1745 Å2 (Table S1), respectively, corresponding to a C-like structure. For z = 9+ to 13+, the CSS profiles displayed multiple CCS bands consistent with co-existing C- and P-like structures. We also noticed more CCS features for z = 9+ to 11+ of the denatured H2A.1 when compared to the native form (Table S1). Moreover, there were major differences in the CCS profiles between data obtained using the TIMS-MS and FAIMS-TIMS-MS configurations: the addition of the FAIMS stage significantly changed the CCS profiles of the P-like structures for denatured H2A.1. No differences in the CCS profiles were observed for the highest z (17+ to 20+), suggesting that E-like structures are less sensitive to the ion heating of the FAIMS stage.

The compensation field profiles (EC) of FAIMS-TOF MS (black traces) and FAIMS-TIMS-TOF MS (red traces) of native and denatured H2A.1 for typical charge states are shown in Figures 2e and 2f, respectively (all profiles are shown in and Figure S2c and S3c). No major EC profile differences were observed between the native and denaturing starting conditions and with the inclusion of the TIMS separation. The total ion chromatogram (TIC) was comprised of ion signals ranging from −5 V/cm ≤ EC ≤ +60 V/cm, suggesting the existence of multiple structures with varying dipole alignments. The C-like structures exhibited high EC values with a decreasing trend toward P- and E-like structures. Notably, a bimodal distribution was observed for the E-like structures (i.e., higher charge states) with the lowest EC values.

Features in the 2-D FAIMS-TIMS palette were denoted per charge state using alphabet letters from high to low EC values and numbers from low to high CCS values; note that these labels are charge state specific and they correspond to different types of structures. However, each denoted feature may contain different structures that are not separated based on mobility and m/z. The 2-D palettes of the lowest charge states (z = 6+ to 8+) of native and denatured H2A.1 (Figures 2g, 2h, S2d, and S3d) displayed a homogenous feature denoted by A1, characteristic of a C-like structure. In addition, a feature B1 corresponding to a slightly less compact structure was observed for z = 8+ at lower EC and higher CCS ranges. The 2-D palette of z = 9+ for native H2A.1 displayed elongated features A1 and B1 with CCS and EC values spanning from ~1880 to 2225 Å2 and ~ 25 to 55 V/cm, respectively. This is consistent with co-existing ions populating C- and P-like structures. In contrast, an additional feature B2 with higher CCS (~ 2447 Å2), corresponding to an E-like structure was observed for the denatured H2A.1. The 2-D palettes of z = 10+ for native and denatured H2A.1 showed two distinct features, A1 (CCS ~2345 Å2, EC ~ 40 V/cm) and B1 (CCS ~2600 Å2, EC ~ 35 V/cm), suggesting co-existing structures comprised of P- and E-like conformations. In addition, feature A1 (P-like structure) was more abundant for native H2A.1, while B1 (E conformation) was more abundant for denatured H2A.1. The 2-D palettes of z = 11+ for native H2A.1 showed two features A1 (CCS ~ 2491 Å2, EC ~ 37 V/cm) and A2 (CCS ~ 2715 Å2, EC ~ 35 V/cm), corresponding to P- and E-like structures, whereas only one feature A1 (CCS ~2640 Å2, EC ~ 33 V/cm) corresponding to E-like structures was observed for the denatured H2A.1. For z = 12+ to 14+, two features A1 and A2 have similar EC values but significantly different CCS values were observed for native H2A.1, suggesting P- and E- like structures. Whereas three features A1, A2, and A3 have similar EC values but different CCS values were observed for z =12+ and 13+ for denatured H2A.1. These changes in the 2D palettes with the starting solvent condition are particularly relevant since H2A.1 possesses intrinsically disordered N- and C-terminal tails, which may or may not be exposed during the transition from solution to gas phase. Moreover, an additional feature B1 at higher CCS and lower EC values was observed for z = 13+ and 14+ for denatured H2A.1, suggesting E-like structures with different dipole alignment than those observed at higher EC (e.g., A3 of 13+ and A2 of 14+). For the z = 15+ to 17+ of native and denatured H2A.1, the relative abundance of A1 features, corresponding to P-like structures, decreased when the charge state increased, while B1 features, at lower EC corresponding to E-like structures with higher dipole alignment increased. For the highest charge states (z ≥ 18+ to 20+), multiple 2-D features were observed with small CCS differences (e.g., A1, A2, A3) in the ~ 4000 to 4200 Å2 CCS range; the observation of B1 features at a lower EC suggests E-like structures with varying dipole alignments.

Impact of FAIMS stage on the CCS profiles.

The addition of the “dome” FAIMS stage led to significant decrease of the ion transmission, with ~ 12 % and ~27% efficiency for native and denatured studies under “soft” ion injection setting conditions, respectively (Table S2). Moreover, changes in the CCS profiles were observed with the introduction of the FAIMS stage (Figure 2), presumably due to ion heating, which was the most significant for the case of P-like structures over the 9+ and 10+ charge states. The ion heating in the FAIMS stage was evaluated using comparative CIU-TIMS-MS measurements (Figure 3). The CIU fingerprints for z = 9+ and 10+ are shown in Figure 3a (all profiles are shown in Figure S4).

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

(a) CIU-TIMS fingerprints, (b) overlay of CIU-TIMS (blue traces) and FAIMS-TIMS (red traces) CCS profiles for 9+ and 10+ charge states of H2A.1 from native starting conditions.

The inspection of the CIU profiles also showed a significant influence of the starting solution – native vs. denatured H2A.1, with the largest differences among the intermediate charge states (P-like structures). For example, the CIU fingerprint of z = 7+ for native and denatured H2A.1 shows C- and P- like structures. At the lowest collision voltage (~ 10 – 50 V), the CCS was ~ 1650 Å2 (state 0), corresponding to C-like structures. When the collision voltage was increased from ~ 50 to 200 V, the CCS increased to ~ 2000 Å2 (state 1), corresponding to P-like structures. At higher collision voltages (~180 – 200 V), the relative abundance for state 0 of native H2A.1 remained high, while it decreased for the state 0 of denatured H2A.1. This result suggests that while these gas-phase structures share similar CCS values and represent C-like structures, they also present enough intramolecular differences (e.g., salt-bridges) to create different CIU patterns. In the cases of z = 8+, 9+, and 10+ the CIU profiles showed mainly three CIU states: 0 with C-like structures, 1 with P-like structures, and 2 with E-like structures, sensitive to the starting solution condition.

The comparison of the CCS profiles from CIU-TIMS and FAIMS-TIMS for the z = 9+ and 10+ reveals that FAIMS heating is equivalent to ~240 eV collision heating at reduced pressure (~2 mbar), as seen in the overlay of the CIU profiles for the z = 9+ (26 V CIU) and z = 10+ (24 V CIU) shown in Figure 3. These charge states showed the largest dependence with ion heating and provided an estimate of the ion heating in the FAIMS stage.

In the case of z = 11+, the 0 state was observed for both native and denatured H2A.1, with lower relative abundance in the denatured form. The states 1 and 2 also showed differences; for example, multiple CCS bands from ~ 2820 to 3100 Å2 for state 2 of the denatured form. Interestingly, at the highest collision voltage (~180 – 200 V), a decrease in CCS was observed for the denatured H2A.1. Typically, gas-phase activation results in unfolding,62 however, compaction of protein structures upon activation have also been reported.6364 For z = 12+ and higher, the CIU fingerprints of both native and denatured H2A.1 were similar.

CMD Simulations of solution phase H2A.1.

Figure 4a shows the amino acid sequence and the α-helices, β-sheets, 310-helices, and the N- and C-terminal regions of H2A.1. The radius of gyration (Rgyr) profile along the simulation time served to identify the structural rearrangement events. For example, the snapshots (A to I) of H2A.1 conformations along the solution phase MD simulations time are shown in Figure 4b. The initial DNA bound X-ray structure of H2A.1 (A) comprises of five α-helices (α1 to α5), three β-sheets (β1 to β3), two 310-helices, together with the long and disordered N- and C-terminal tails. As shown in conformation A, these structural elements are stabilized in the nucleosome by hydrogen bonding to DNA and by interactions with α- helices from histones H3 and H4.4, 65 The N- and C-terminal tails of the initial X-ray structure were highly extended, leading to an E conformation with a calculated Rgyr value of 25.2 Å. At 60 ns (Rgyr = 23.9 Å), the β-sheets and 310-helices were melted and the N- and C-terminal regions (α1 and α5) were collapsed, leading to a conformation B stabilized by salt-bridges K13/E56, K15/E56, K95/E92, K118/E64, and K119/E121. The β-sheets and 310-helices in the N- and C-terminal tails were transformed into random coil structures consistent with previous findings for a nucleosome-free H2A-H2B heterodimer.65 At 110 ns, the N- and C-terminal tails were gradually folded toward the α-helical core of H2A.1, leading to a partially folded conformation C (Rgyr = 17 Å), stabilized by salt-bridges K13/E56, K95/E92, K119/E64, and D72/K125. At 131 ns (conformation D, Rgyr = 20.3 Å), the N-terminal tail was extended while the C-terminal tail was still folded and stabilized by salt-bridges K119/E64, K127/D90, and K129/E61. After 140 ns (conformation E, Rgyr = 22.6 Å), the α1 on the N-terminal vicinity was gradually unfolded, while the C-terminal region was still folded. Subsequently, the N-terminal region was refolded with a formation of α1, but the C-terminal was loosely folded, leading to a conformation F (Rgyr = 21.2 Å) stabilized by salt-bridges R20/E56, K118/E121, K129/E61, and K129/E64. In addition, the region in the N-terminal vicinity was further refolded, leading to a more compact structure (conformation G, Rgyr =18.0 Å) stabilized by R20/E56. At 226 ns (conformation H, Rgyr = 16.1 Å), the α1 was melted, leading to exposure of basic residues R3, K5, and R20, which interact with side chains of acidic residues (E56, E64, and D72) from α3. In addition, folding of the C-terminal domain is stabilized by salt-bridges K119/E121 and K125/E61 between α3 and C-terminal tail. At 310 ns, both the N- and C-terminal tails were tightly compacted (conformation I, Rgyr = 15.0 Å) and stabilized by electrostatic interactions between basic residues (K5, K9, K11, K13, R17, R20, R29, K119) from N- and C-tails and acidic residues (E41, E56, E61, E64, D90, E92) from the α-helical core. The Rgyr profile did not change for an additional 45 ns, suggesting that the most stable conformation (conformation I), close to the compact conformation of H2A.1, was achieved.

Gas-phase H2A.1 structures.

Gas phase SAMD and SMD simulations generated candidate structures for the main CCS features observed during the TIMS-MS experiments (Figure S5 and Table S1). Representative candidate structures are shown as a function of the charge state and CCS range as a way to understand potential structural motifs retained from the starting native solution structure (s) (Figure 4c). For example, inspection of these candidate structures revealed major structural differences associated with the unfolding of N- and C-terminal vicinities, disruption of inter-α-helical contacts leading to exposure of charged residues, increasing the distance of N- and C-terminal domains, and extending of the N-and C-terminal tails in higher charge states (z ≥ 14+).

The z = 8+ candidates exhibit a C-like conformation (equivalent to conformation I from CMD) with a calculated ™CCSN2 value of 2116 Å2 comparable with a CCS value of 2100 Å2 measured by FAIMS-TIMS-MS (Table S1); this good CCS agreement suggests that H2A.1 retains most of its native solution conformation(s) during transition into the gas phase. The z = 9+ candidates show that the major structural changes in the gas phase are associated with an increase in distance between the N- and C-domains. The z = 10+ candidates reveal that the α-helical core was melted, leading to destabilization of the secondary structure and exposure of basic and acidic residues R3, K5, R29, R32, R42, K74, K75, R77, K99, K118, K125, and E64. Furthermore, the α-helices were gradually transformed into β-sheets. The candidates from 11+ to 19+ reveal that random coil structure is the dominant structure for unfolded H2A.1. For example, inspection of candidate structures for charge state 11+ reveal that most helical interactions were lost, followed by distancing between the N- and C-terminal domains. Moreover, the candidate structures for z = 12+ and 13+ display an increasing separation between the N- and C-terminal domains, leading to a highly E-like conformation. Inspection of candidate structures for z ≥ 14+ reveals that highly extended random coil structure was the dominant motif.

Influence of the Charge Distribution on the Dipole Alignment of H2A.1.

The 2D-FAIMS-TIMS panels allowed for the investigation of the correlation between the dipole alignment, the CCS, and the charge state distribution. Experiments showed that H2A.1 gas-phase E-like structures exhibited a stronger dependence on the dipole alignment at higher z (Figures S2d and S3d). That is, extended gas-phase structures can accommodate a large variety of charge distributions leading to a wider range of dipole alignment when compared to more globular structures. The effect of the charge distribution on the dipole alignment is illustrated for the case of z = 19+. As shown in Figure 5a, the candidate structures representative for features A1 (CCS = 4060 Å), A2 (or B, CCS = 4112 Å), and A3 (CCS = 4165 Å) adopt E-like structures with small CCS differences. These candidates have high structural similarity as shown by the small backbone RMSD < 2.8 Å (Figure 5a). Moreover, all basic (blue sticks) and most acidic (red sticks) residues are solvent exposed. All dipole moment values for the candidate structure of the feature A2/B for z = 19+ were calculated in YASARA using AMBER03 force field. A total of 26 basic residues (R3, K5, K9, R11, K12, K15, R17, R20, R29, R32, R35, K36, R42, R71, K74, K75, R77, R81, R88, K95, K99, K118, K119, K125, K127, and K129) were protonated, 7 out of 9 acidic residues (E41, E56, E61, E64, D72, D90, E91, E92, and E121) were deprotonated, and 2 acidic residues were neutralized, leading to a combination of 36 structures with different charge distributions.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

a) Candidate structures for features A1, A2, A3, and B for z = 19+ of H2A.1. b) Frequency plot of dipole moment value (μ) for all 36 structures with different charge distributions for z = 19+ based on candidate A2/B. The neutralized acidic residues (E and/or D) are marked with black circles.

The charge distribution dependence on the dipole is shown in Figure 5b and Table S3. A closer inspection shows that the largest dipole moment value (1505 D) is observed for a structure with neutralized E41 and E64 residues near the N-terminus, whereas the smallest dipole moment value (814 D) is obtained for a structure with neutralized E92 and E121 residues near the C-terminus. While we cannot exclude other potential candidate structures with similar CCS values, this example demonstrates that the charge distribution, particularly in structures with acidic and basic residues exposed, can lead to a wide distribution of the dipole alignment (broad EC profiles). These results are in good agreement with a previous report that suggested dipole alignment under FAIMS experiments for molecular ions with dipole moments above 300 D.66

CONCLUSIONS

In this work, we explore the gas-phase structural heterogeneity of DNA-free histones for the case of H2A.1 using tandem non-linear and linear IMS coupled to mass spectrometry in parallel with molecular simulations. The influence of the starting solvent conditions was also explored; results showed that there is a solution memory effect on the gas-phase observed structures, evidenced by characteristic CSD, mobility profiles, and CIU profiles. The investigation of gas-phase structures using TIMS-TOF MS experiments under “soft” ion injection conditions showed that H2A.1 can adopt multiple structures, ranging from compact to partially unfolded, and then to elongated structures. Under denaturing starting conditions, a higher abundance of P- and E- like structures were observed when compared with native starting conditions. Moreover, while similar CCS profiles were observed for the C- and P- like structures from native and denatured solvent conditions, the differences in the CIU profiles suggest that there are differences in the intramolecular interactions leading to different gas-phase unfolding pathways.

The FAIMS-TIMS-MS results showed that some of the C-and E-like structures are likely stable through the FAIMS interface, while P-like structures are sensitive to the ion heating of the FAIMS interface. Comparative CIU-TIMS experiments suggested that the ion heating in FAIMS is equivalent to 240 eV collisional energy at reduced pressure (~2 mbar). In the case of E-like structures, the addition of the FAIMS interface allowed the investigation of the charge distribution and overall molecular dipole.

The CMD simulation results revealed that the solution native conformation of H2A.1 likely exists as tightly compact-like structures, where the N- and C-terminal tails are stabilized by electrostatic interactions between basic residues on the tails and acidic residues from the α-helical core. The evaluation of gas-phase candidate structures based on theoretical and experimental CCS values suggests that H2A.1 retains most of its in solution native C-like structures during the transition from solution to the gas phase. The comparison of the gas phase structures obtained using SAMD and SMD simulations with the trends observed experimentally suggests that the H2A.1 transition from C- to P-, and to E-like structures are likely associated with unfolding of the N- and C-terminal tails, melting of the α-helical core leading to exposure of basic and acidic residues, increasing distance between the N- and C-terminal domains, and extending of the N-and C-terminal tails in higher charge states (z ≥ 14+). Theoretical dipole and CCS calculations illustrated that the charge distribution in the case of E-like structures (z ≥ 15+) with exposed basic and acidic residues is sufficient to provide a wide range of dipoles, particularly in cases where the CCS profile shows narrow band distributions. While this work highlights the potential of tandem non-linear and linear TIMS for the study of intrinsically disordered proteins not accessible using traditional structural biology tools (NMR and X-ray), this technology can be easily translated to the study of larger proteins and protein complexes.

Supplementary Material

SI

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This work was supported by NIH (1R01GM134247-01). We would like to thank Dr. Prem Chapagain for discussions of the theoretical modeling, Dr. Alexander Shvartsburg for the integration of the “dome” FAIMS stage, and Dr. Mark E. Ridgeway and Dr. Melvin A. Park for the discussions on the FAIMS-TIMS-MS interface and data processing. We will also thank Dr. Brandon Ruotolo and his team for the integration of CIU-TIMS data into the CIU suite.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

Complete FAIMS, TIMS and MS profiles, CIU plots, TIMSCCSN2 reported values, summary of all gas-phase candidate structures per charge state, instrument settings, and dipole values for the candidate structures for charge state 19+ of denatured H2A.1.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Jenuwein T; Allis CD Translating The Histone Code. Science 2001, 293, 1074–1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Wolffe AP Histone Deacetylase: A Regulator Of Transcription. Science 1996, 272, 371–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).van Attikum H; Gasser SM The Histone Code At DNA Breaks: A Guide To Repair? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2005, 6, 757–765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Davey CA; Sargent DF; Luger K; Maeder AW; Richmond TJ Solvent Mediated Interactions In The Structure Of The Nucleosome Core Particle At 1.9 A Resolution. J. Mol. Biol 2002, 319, 1097–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Gurard-Levin ZA; Quivy JP; Almouzni G. Histone Chaperones: Assisting Histone Traffic And Nucleosome Dynamics. Annu. Rev. Biochem 2014, 83, 487–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).McGinty RK; Tan S. Nucleosome Structure And Function. Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 2255–2273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Corujo D; Buschbeck M. Post-Translational Modifications Of H2A Histone Variants And Their Role In Cancer. Cancers 2018, 10, 59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Strahl BD; Allis CD The Language Of Covalent Histone Modifications. Nature 2000, 403, 41–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Seligson DB; Horvath S; Shi T; Yu H; Tze S; Grunstein M; Kurdistani SK Global Histone Modification Patterns Predict Risk of Prostate Cancer Recurrence. Nature 2005, 435, 1262–1266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Kurdistani SK Histone Modifications As Markers Of Cancer Prognosis: A Cellular View. Br. J. Cancer 2007, 97, 1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Araki Y; Mimura T. The Histone Modification Code in The Pathogenesis Of Autoimmune Diseases. Mediat. Inflamm 2017, 2608605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Eitoku M; Sato L; Senda T; Horikoshi M. Histone Chaperones: 30 Years From Isolation To Elucidation Of The Mechanisms Of Nucleosome Assembly And Disassembly. Cell. Mol. Life Sci 2008, 65, 414–444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Zhou B-R; Yadav KNS; Borgnia M; Hong J; Cao B; Olins AL; Olins DE; Bai Y; Zhang P. Atomic Resolution Cryo-Em Structure Of A Native-Like Cenp-A Nucleosome Aided By An Antibody Fragment. Nat. Commun 2019, 10, 2301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Clemmer DE; Jarrold MF Ion Mobility Measurements and Their Applications to Clusters and Biomolecules. J. Mass Spectrom 1997, 32, 577–592. [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Ruotolo BT; Benesch JL; Sandercock AM; Hyung SJ; Robinson CV Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Analysis Of Large Protein Complexes. Nat. Protoc 2008, 3, 1139–1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Fernandez-Lima FA; Wei H; Gao YQ; Russell DH On The Structure Elucidation Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry And Molecular Dynamics. J. Phy. Chem. A 2009, 113, 8221–8234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Jurneczko E; Barran PE How Useful Is Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry For Structural Biology? The Relationship Between Protein Crystal Structures And Their Collision Cross Sections In The Gas Phase. Analyst 2011, 136, 20–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Landreh M; Marklund EG; Uzdavinys P; Degiacomi MT; Coincon M; Gault J; Gupta K; Liko I; Benesch JLP; Drew D; et al. Integrating Mass Spectrometry With MD Simulations Reveals The Role Of Lipids In Na+/H+ Antiporters. Nat. Commun 2017, 8, 13993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Koeniger SL; Merenbloom SI; Clemmer DE Evidence for Many Resolvable Structures Within Conformation Types Of Electrosprayed Ubiquitin Ions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 7017–7021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Wyttenbach T; Bowers MT Structural Stability From Solution To The Gas Phase: Native Solution Structure Of Ubiquitin Survives Analysis In A Solvent-Free Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Environment. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 12266–12275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Shvartsburg AA; Bryskiewicz T; Purves RW; Tang K; Guevremont R; Smith RD Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry Studies Of Proteins: Dipole Alignment In Ion Mobility Spectrometry? J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 21966–21980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Shvartsburg AA; Smith RD High-Resolution Differential Ion Mobility Spectrometry Of A Protein. Anal. Chem 2013, 85, 10–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Isenberg SL; Armistead PM; Glish GL Optimization Of Peptide Separations By Differential Ion Mobility Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 2014, 25, 1592–1599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Hernandez O; Isenberg S; Steinmetz V; Glish GL; Maitre P. Probing Mobility-Selected Saccharide Isomers: Selective Ion-Molecule Reactions And Wavelength-Specific IR Activation. J. Chem. A 2015, 119, 6057–6064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Revercomb HE; Mason EA Theory of Plasma Chromatography/Gaseous Electrophoresis. Rev. Anal. Chem 1975, 47, 970–983. [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Gabelica V; Shvartsburg AA; Afonso C; Barran P; Benesch JLP; Bleiholder C; Bowers MT; Bilbao A; Bush MF; Campbell JL, et al. Recommendations For Reporting Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry Measurements. Mass Spectrom. Rev 2019, 38, 291–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Schenk ER; Almeida R; Miksovska J; Ridgeway ME; Park MA; Fernandez-Lima F. Kinetic Intermediates Of Holo- And Apo-Myoglobin Studied Using Hdx-Tims-Ms And Molecular Dynamic Simulations. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 2015, 26, 555–563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Molano-Arevalo JC; Jeanne Dit Fouque K; Pham K; Miksovska J; Ridgeway ME; Park MA; Fernandez-Lima F. Characterization Of Intramolecular Interactions Of Cytochrome C Using Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange-Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry And Molecular Dynamics. Anal. Chem 2017, 89, 8757–8765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Garabedian A; Butcher D; Lippens JL; Miksovska J; Chapagain PP; Fabris D; Ridgeway ME; Park MA; Fernandez-Lima F. Structures Of The Kinetically Trapped I-Motif DNA Intermediates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2016, 18, 26691–26702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Jeanne Dit Fouque K; Moreno J; Fernandez-Lima F, Exploring the Conformational Space of Growth-Hormone-Releasing Hormone Analogues Using Dopant Assisted Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 6169–6177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Jeanne Dit Fouque K; Fernandez-Lima F. Following Structural Changes By Thermal Denaturation Using Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124, 6257–6265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Jeanne Dit Fouque K; Garabedian A; Leng F; Tse-Dinh Y-C; Ridgeway M; Park M; Fernandez-Lima F. Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry Of Native Macromolecular Assemblies. Anal. Chem 2021, 93, 2933–2941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Guevremont R; Purves RW Atmospheric Pressure Ion Focusing In A High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometer. Rev. Sci. Instrum 1999, 70, 1370–1383. [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Guevremont R; Barnett DA; Purves RW; Vandermey J. Analysis Of A Tryptic Digest Of Pig Hemoglobin Using ESI-FAIMS-MS. Anal. Chem 2000, 72, 4577–4584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Guevremont R. High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry: A New Tool For Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1058, 3–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Fernandez-Lima FA; Kaplan DA; Park MA Note: Integration of Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry With Mass Spectrometry. Rev. Sci. Instrum 2011, 82, 126106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Fernandez-Lima F; Kaplan DA; Suetering J; Park MA Gas-Phase Separation Using A Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometer. Int. J. Ion. Mobil. Spectrom 2011, 14, 10.1007/s12127-011-0067-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Guevremont R; Thekkadath G; Hilton CK Compensation Voltage (CV) Peak Shapes Using A Domed FAIMS With The Inner Electrode Translated To Various Longitudinal Positions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 2005, 16, 948–956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Tang K; Li F; Shvartsburg AA; Strittmatter EF; Smith RD Two-Dimensional Gas-Phase Separations Coupled To Mass Spectrometry For Analysis Of Complex Mixtures. Anal. Chem 2005, 77, 6381–6388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Liu FC; Kirk SR; Bleiholder C. On The Structural Denaturation Of Biological Analytes In Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry - Mass Spectrometry. Anal. 2016, 141, 3722–3730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Jeanne Dit Fouque K; Fernandez-Lima F. Recent Advances In Biological Separations Using Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry- Mass Spectrometry. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem 2019, 116, 308–315. [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Hernandez DR; Debord JD; Ridgeway ME; Kaplan DA; Park MA; Fernandez-Lima F. Ion Dynamics In A Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometer. Analyst 2014, 139, 1913–1921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Mason EA; McDaniel EW Transport Properties Of Ions In Gases. In Transport Properties of Ions in Gases, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988, pp 1–560. [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Eschweiler JD; Rabuck-Gibbons JN; Tian Y; Ruotolo BT CIU suite: A Quantitative Analysis Package for Collision Induced Unfolding Measurements of Gas-Phase Protein Ions. Anal. Chem 2015, 87, 11516–11522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Pham K; Dhulipala G; Gonzalez WG; Gerstman BS; Regmi C; Chapagain PP; Miksovska J. Ca2+ and Mg2+ Modulate Conformational Dynamics And Stability Of Downstream Regulatory Element Antagonist Modulator. Protein Sci. 2015, 24, 741–751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Humphrey W; Dalke A; Schulten K. VMD: Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graph 1996, 14, 33–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Emsley P; Cowtan K. Coot: Model-Building Tools for Molecular Graphics. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 2004, 60, 2126–2132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Phillips JC; Braun R; Wang W; Gumbart J; Tajkhorshid E; Villa E; Chipot C; Skeel RD; Kalé L; Schulten K. Scalable Molecular Dynamics With NAMD. J. Comput. Chem 2005, 26, 1781–1802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Best RB; Zhu X; Shim J; Lopes PEM; Mittal J; Feig M; MacKerell AD Optimization Of The Additive Charmm All-Atom Protein Force Field Targeting Improved Sampling of the Backbone ϕ, Ψ and Side-Chain Χ1 and Χ2 Dihedral Angles. J. Chem. Theo. Comput 2012, 8, 3257–3273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Essmann U; Perera L; Berkowitz ML; Darden T; Lee H; Pedersen LG A Smooth Particle Mesh Ewald Method. J. Chem. Phys 1995, 103, 8577–8593. [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Camacho IS; Theisen A; Johannissen LO; Díaz-Ramos LA; Christie JM; Jenkins GI; Bellina B; Barran P; Jones AR Native Mass Spectrometry Reveals The Conformational Diversity Of The UVR8 Photoreceptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 2019, 116, 1116–1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Lu H; Schulten K. Steered Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Force-Induced Protein Domain Unfolding. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf 1999, 35, 453–463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).von Helden G; Hsu MT; Gotts N; Bowers MT Carbon Cluster Cations With Up To 84 Atoms: Structures, Formation Mechanism, And Reactivity. The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1993, 97, 8182–8192. [Google Scholar]
  • (54).Schenk ER; Nau F; Fernandez-Lima F. Theoretical Predictor For Candidate Structure Assignment From IMS Data Of Biomolecule-Related Conformational Space. Int. J. Ion Mobil. Spectrom 2015, 18, 23–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (55).Larriba C; Hogan CJ Free Molecular Collision Cross Section Calculation Methods For Nanoparticles And Complex Ions With Energy Accommodation. J. Comput. Phys 2013, 251, 344–363. [Google Scholar]
  • (56).Larriba C; Hogan CJ Ion Mobilities In Diatomic Gases: Measurement Versus Prediction With Non-Specular Scattering Models. J. Phys.Chem. A 2013, 117, 3887–3901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (57).Larriba-Andaluz C; Fernández-García J; Ewing MA; Hogan CJ; Clemmer DE Gas Molecule Scattering & Ion Mobility Measurements For Organic Macro-Ions In He Versus N2 Environments. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2015, 17, 15019–15029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (58).Larriba-Andaluz C; Jr., C. J. H. Collision Cross Section Calculations For Polyatomic Ions Considering Rotating Diatomic/Linear Gas Molecules. J. Chem. Phys 2014, 141, 194107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (59).Shrivastav V; Nahin M; Hogan CJ; Larriba-Andaluz C. Benchmark Comparison For A Multi-Processing Ion Mobility Calculator In The Free Molecular Regime. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 2017, 28, 1540–1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (60).Tien MZ; Meyer AG; Sydykova DK; Spielman SJ; Wilke CO Maximum Allowed Solvent Accessibilites Of Residues In Proteins. PLOS ONE 2013, 8, e80635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (61).Shvartsburg AA; Li F; Tang K; Smith RD Distortion Of Ion Structures By Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry. Anal. Chem 2007, 79, 1523–1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (62).Benesch JLP Collisional Activation Of Protein Complexes: Picking Up the Pieces. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 2009, 20, 341–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (63).Hall Z; Politis A; Bush MF; Smith LJ; Robinson CV Charge-State Dependent Compaction And Dissociation Of Protein Complexes: Insights From Ion Mobility And Molecular Dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 3429–3438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (64).Zhou M; Liu W; Shaw JB Charge Movement and Structural Changes In The Gas-Phase Unfolding Of Multimeric Protein Complexes Captured By Native Top-Down Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem 2020, 92, 1788–1795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (65).Moriwaki Y; Yamane T; Ohtomo H; Ikeguchi M; Kurita J.-i.; Sato M; Nagadoi A; Shimojo H; Nishimura Solution Structure Of The Isolated Histone H2a-H2b Heterodimer. Sci. Rep 2016, 6, 24999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (66).Shvartsburg AA; Noskov SY; Purves RW; Smith RD Pendular Proteins In Gases And New Avenues For Characterization Of Macromolecules By Ion Mobility Spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 2009, 106, 6495–6500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES