Skip to main content
African Health Sciences logoLink to African Health Sciences
. 2021 Jun;21(2):875–883. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i2.49

Prevalence and correlates of substance use among undergraduates in a developing country

Chinyere Mirian Aguocha 1, Emeka Nwefoh 1
PMCID: PMC8568244  PMID: 34795747

Abstract

Background

Psychoactive substance use is a major global public health issue. Use of psychoactive substances has been associated with negative consequences among students.

Objective

The study assessed the prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of psychoactive substance use among undergraduate students in a Nigerian university.

Materials and Methods

This was a cross-sectional descriptive study of 763 undergraduate students of Imo State University, Owerri, Nigeria, recruited using multi-stage sampling technique. Data on the socio-demographic characteristics and pattern of psychoactive substance use were collected using a structured questionnaire.

Results

The lifetime rate of psychoactive substance use was 84.5%. Alcohol had the highest rate of lifetime (82.5%) and 12-month (61.1%) use. There was a similar rate of lifetime use of psychoactive substances among males (86.1%) and females (83.4%). Age (p<0.05) and place of residence (p<0.05) were significantly associated with lifetime psychoactive substance use. Catholics (OR:1.43; 1.03 – 1.99), whose friend (OR:1.94; 1.39 – 2.71), roommate (OR:3.06; (1.62 – 5.78) or brother (OR:1.22; 0.77 – 1.93) uses psychoactive substances were significantly more likely to have used substances in the past 12-months.

Conclusion

There is a high rate of psychoactive substance use among the students. Age, religion, place of residence, family and peer use of substances are important determinants of psychoactive substance use.

Keywords: Substance use, undergraduates, Nigeria

Introduction

Psychoactive substances are a class of substances, licit and illicit, that when ingested or administered affect mental processes.1 Psychoactive substance use is a major global public health issue, with an estimated 30 million substance users worldwide and most of these young people.1 Nigeria with its huge population of young people, ranks among one of the highest users of harmful drugs such as alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, benzodiazepines, cocaine, and opioids.2 Excessive use and uncontrolled access, coupled with concern over the link between psychoactive substance use with interpersonal relationships and cognitive difficulties, risky behavior, crimes and cultism among students have led to worries among both health personnel and educators.36

In Nigeria, the South East geopolitical zone (especially Imo State) is reported to have one of the highest prevalence rates of substance use in Nigeria.7

Among undergraduate students in Nigeria, the rate of psychoactive substance use is reported to be far higher than what is reported among the general populace.7,8,9,10 In Southwest Nigeria, 58.4% – 65% of undergraduates have used psychoactive substances at least once in their lifetime while 15.4% have reported current use.8,9 In Benin, South South Nigeria 46.6% lifetime rate has been found.10 Many studies show that alcohol is the most commonly used psychoactive substance among undergraduates. In Uyo, South South Nigeria, all the students surveyed reported a lifetime use of alcohol.11 In Southwest Nigeria, a wide range (13.6%–63.4%) was reported.8, 9, 12 In South East Nigeria, a range, (50.2%–78.4%) which showed a very high rate of current use of alcohol was found.13, 14 In North Central Nigeria, 77% lifetime rate was found in an early study15 but 15 years later, a lower rate of 13.6% was reported.16

Similarly, varying rates have been reported for other psychoactive substances. A study in South West Nigeria showed that tobacco (81%) was the commonest substance used.17 In North Central Nigeria15, 16, Southwest Nigeria8, 9, 12 and South East Nigeria, 3.2%–37.4%, 2.3%–43.8% and 12.1%13 respectively was reported. For sedatives, 6.1%–7.3% was found.8, 16

Relatively low use has been recorded for cannabis, organic solvents, hallucinogens, cocaine and narcotic analgesics.15 Marijuana use was found to be 1.4% in South East Nigeria13 while in South West Nigeria, 20% was reported.12 For stimulants, 45.3% and 29.1% lifetime and current use, 69.2% and 15.6% lifetime rates was reported in South East, North Central and Southwest Nigeria respectively.8, 15, 18

Findings on the association between gender and substance use have been mixed. In Enugu, South East Nigeria a marked disparity in the pattern of use was reported, which when disaggregated by gender showed male and female students respectively used alcohol 92.5% and 7.5%, tobacco (smoke) 96.1% and 1.0%) and marijuana 100.0% and 00.0%.13 A more recent study in the same region found that male undergraduates were five times more likely to use psychoactive substances compared to their female counterpart.18 In South West, Nigeria, it was found that lifetime use of alcohol was significantly higher among the male students (45.9%) compared to the female students (32.8%); current use of alcohol was significantly higher among the female students (16.4%) compared to the male students (10.2%).9 In South South Nigeria, a greater rate among females was reported.11

A study in Sudan found the overall prevalence of substance use to be 31%. The most common substance used was tobacco followed by cannabis and alcohol.19 The commonest reason for initiating substance use was curiosity.19 Peers were found to be the commonest sources of substances.19 The study found no association between age and substance use.19 Another study carried out among Ethiopian undergraduates found more substance use among children of uneducated parents.20 The same study found that older students were 2.4 times more likely to use substances than the younger students.20 Male students and students who have friends and family members who use substances were more likely to use substances.20

With the high rate of substance use reported in the state, it has become imperative to study the pattern and rates of substance use in one of the most highly populated high institutions located in the heart of the state. It is hoped that this paper will draw the attention of the relevant authorities to issue of substance use in the institution.

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of substance use among students of Imo State University, Owerri.

Subjects and Methods

The study was carried out among undergraduate students of Imo State University, Owerri, Imo State. The University has 11 Faculties and 63 Departments. The university has a population of over fifteen thousand undergraduate students.

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out on seven hundred and sixty three undergraduates who gave consent to be part of the study. Students were included in the study if they were current undergraduate students of IMSU who gave consent to be part of the study and were aged between 18–30 years. Students were excluded if they declined to take part and if they were absent from studies during data collection.

Data collection

The sample size was calculated using 5% of the total estimated population of 15,000 current undergraduate students, and adjusting for 10% attrition, a total minimum sample size of 825 was achieved.21

Multi-stage sampling technique was used for sample selection. The 11 faculties of the Imo State University Owerri served as the sampling frame. During the first stage, for ease of data collection, using simple random sampling, 3 faculties were selected. These were the faculties of Business Administration, Education, and Social Sciences.

During the second stage, using simple random sampling, 2 departments were selected from each faculty. From the Faculty of Business Administration, the Departments of Management and Insurance were selected, from Faculty of Education, the Departments of Education Biology and Education History were selected while from the Faculty of Social Sciences, the Departments of Psychology and Mass Communication were selected.

In the third stage, using proportionate sampling techniques, respondents were recruited from each department to make up the calculated sample size. Each department was stratified by years of study and gender, on the assumption that duration of stay in the campus and sex would affect substance use. The total sample size was distributed proportionally to the selected departments based on the total number of students in each year of study according to gender. Finally, individual students fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly selected to be study participants.

Data collection took place between February and May 2019. A Structured questionnaire was used for data collection. The structured questionnaire was divided into two sections. Section A comprised the socio-demographic characteristics while Section B covered the relevant desired information for the study. Socio-demographic characteristics such as sex, age, marital status, religion, place of residence, parental employment status and level of education. Section B focused on substance use. This was partly adapted from the World Health Organization (WHO) model core student and focused on substances that are commonly used in Nigeria.22 Alcohol, Amphetamine, Cannabis, Cigarette, Codeine, Cocaine, Heroin, Sedatives, Solvents, and Tramadol were the substances studied. The non-existent drug “Relevin” was included as a validity check.23

The recruitment took place in the lecture halls. The sample frame consisted of students in the selected departments who were in the lecture hall, who volunteered to be part of the study and who met the inclusion criteria. Numbers were written on pieces of papers, which were then rumpled. The papers were shaken and were picked until the calculated sample size was achieved. Then the questionnaire was distributed to all the respondents. Guide on how to answer each question on the questionnaire was demonstrated to the students. To ensure confidentiality, the respondents were advised to fill the questionnaires when alone and a date was scheduled with them on when the questionnaires were to be returned to the researcher. Substance utilization was estimated for lifetime, 12 month and 30 day and 7 day use. For the purpose of this study, lifetime, 12 month and 30 day and 7 day use was defined as the use of substances at least once within the designated period.

Data handling: Data collected were cleaned manually and analyzed using computer software (SPSS for Windows, Version 21.0, Chicago, SPSS Inc.). Statistical testing was conducted at the 5% significance level. Socio-demographic characteristics were tabulated and frequencies and percentages calculated. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using Pearson's chi-square test and logistic regression to test the associations between variables.

Ethical issues

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Imo State University Teaching Hospital with Letter of Introduction from Imo State University, Owerri. All respondents gave voluntary informed consent before recruitment into the study. This study did not involve any procedure that was detrimental to the respondent. It was explained to them that the information given would be kept confidential.

Results

Out of the 825 questionnaires distributed, thirty seven questionnaires were not returned while 25 questionnaires were discarded due to inconsistent responses and recording the use of the non-existent drug Relexin.

Table 1 shows the socio-demographic distribution of the respondents.

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents

Variable Frequency
N=763
Percentage (%)
Gender
Male 323 42.3
Female 440 57.7
Age (years)
18–22 494 64.7
23–26 226 29.6
27–30 43 5.6
Marital status
Single 736 96.5
Married 27 3.5
Religion
Catholic 305 40.0
Pentecostal 273 35.8
Anglican 156 20.4
Others 29 3.8
Year in school
100 194 25.4
200 200 26.2
300 166 21.8
400 203 26.6
Place of residence
Off-campus 478 62.6
Lives with parents 140 18.3
School hostel 98 12.8
Lives with relations 47 6.2
Friends that use substances
Yes 433 56.7
No 330 43.3
Father's employment status
Employed 608 79.7
Retired 99 13.0
Unemployed 40 5.2
Late 16 2.1

There were a total of 763 respondents, 440 females (57.7%) and 323 (42.3%) males. Most of the respondents (64.7%, N = 494) were aged 18–22 years, and were single, (96.5%, N=736). Many, (40%, N=305), belonged to the Catholic Church. Many of the respondents, (26.6%, N=203), were in fourth year. Most of the respondents, (62.6%, N=478) lived off-campus. Majority, (56.7%, N=433) had friends who used psychoactive substances.

Table 2 shows the rate of use of substances. The lifetime, 12-month, 30-day and 7-day use of substances was 84.5%, 63.0%, 45.9% and 28.2% respectively. The commonest substance used was alcohol with lifetime, 12-month, 30-day and 7-day rates of 82.5%, 61.1%, 44.2%, and 26.2% respectively. For lifetime use, the licit substances alcohol (82%), sedatives (14.2%), cigarette (13.6%), and tramadol (8.8%) were the commonest substances used while cannabis (7.6%) was the commonest illicit substance used.

Table 2.

Rates of psychoactive substance use

Variable Lifetime use 12 month 30 days 7 days
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Substance
use
645(84.5) 481(63.0) 350 (45.9) 215 (28.2)
Alcohol 631(82.7) 466 (61.1) 337 (44.2) 200 (26.2)
Sedatives 108 (14.2) 59 (7.7) 40 (5.2) 20 (2.6)
Cigarette 104 (13.6) 54 (7.1) 42 (5.5) 35 (4.6)
Tramadol 67 (8.8) 56 (7.3) 30 (3.9) 18 (2.4)
Cannabis 58 (7.6) 37 (4.8) 37 (4.8) 27 (3.5)
Codeine 47 (6.2) 21 (2.8) 14 (1.8) 5 (0.7)
Cocaine 11(1.4) 4 (0.5) - -
Solvents 6 (0.8) - -
Amphetamine 6 (0.8) 5 (0.7) 2 (0.3) 2 (0.3)
Heroin 4 (0.5) 3 (0.4) - -

N=763

Table 3 shows the determinants of lifetime substance use. Factors significantly associated with lifetime use of psychoactive substances were age (p<0.05), place of residence (p<0.05), use of psychoactive substances by friends, roommates, brother, sister, or a parent (p<0.05). Students who had friends who abused psychoactive substances were significantly about three time likely to have used substances (OR:3.27; 2.06 -5.18) compared to their counterparts.

Table 3.

Determinants of lifetime substance use

Variable Substance use Stat p-value OR:95% CI
Yes (%) No (%)
Gender
Male 278 (86.1) 45 (13.9) 0.95 (0.61 – 1.48)
Female 367 (83.4) 73 (16.6) χ2=1.01 0.18 1.00
Age (years)
18–22 405 (82.0) 89 (18.0) 1.41 (0.55– 0.65)
23–26 205 (90.7) 21 (9.3) 2.33 (0.85 – 6.41)
27–30 35 (81.4) 8 (18.6) χ2=9.37 0.01* 1.00
Current marital status
Single 621 (84.4) 115 (15.6) 0.57 (0.15 – 2.21)
Married 24 (88.9) 3 (11.1) χ2=0.41 0.52 1.00
Religion
Catholic 264 (86.6) 41 (13.4) 1.30 (0.84 – 2.01)
Others 381 (83.2) 77 (16.8) χ2=1.59 0.21 1.00
Year in school
100 163 (84.0) 31 (16.0) 1.54 (0.87 – 2.75)
200 168 (84.0) 32 (16.0) 1.41 (0.81 -2.46)
300 148 (89.2) 18 (10.8) 1.88 (0.98 – 3.59)
400 166 (81.8) 37 (18.2) χ2=3.98 0.26 1.00
Place of residence
Lives with parents 110 (78.6) 30 (21.4) 1.00
Others 535 (85.9) 88 (14.1) χ2=4.66 0.03* 1.41 (0.86 – 2.31)
Father's employment
status
Employed 508 (83.6) 100 (16.4) 1.08 (0.23 – 5.08)
Unemployed 33 (82.5) 7(17.5) F=3.84 0.26 0.84 (0.14 – 4.89)
Retired 90 (90.9) 9 (9.1) 2.04 (0.38 – 11.10)
Late 14 (87.5) 2 (12.5) 1.00
Use by friends
Yes 399 (92.1) 34 (7.9) 3.27*(2.06 -5.18)
No 246 (74.5) 84 (25.5) χ2=44.4 <0.001* 1.00
Use by room mate
Yes 113 (95.8) 5 (4.2) 2.56 (0.93 – 7.04)
No 532 (82.5) 113 (17.5) χ2=13.5 <0.001* 1.00
Use by brother
Yes 181 (91.4) 17 (8.6) 1.23 (0.63 -2.38)
No 464 (82.1) 101 (17.9) χ2=9.7 <0.001* 1.00
Use by sister
Yes 68 (93.2) 5 (6.8) 1.18 (0.37 – 3.74)
No 577 (83.6) 113 (16.4) χ2=4.6 0.04* 1.00
Parental use
Yes 138 (90.2) 15 (9.8) 0.98 (0.50 – 1.95)
No 507 (83.1) 103 (16.9) χ2=4.7 0.02* 1.00
Parental fights
Yes 37 (94.9) 2 (5.1) 2.27 (0.51 – 10.04)
No 608 (84.0) 116 (16.0) 1.00
*

significant at p.0.05

F=Fisher's Exact Test

Table 4 shows the determinants of 12-month substance use. Gender, age, year in school, and father's employment status (p<0.05) were significantly associated with substance use. Use by friends, roommate, brother, sister, parent and frequent parental fights (p<0.05) were also significantly associated with 12-month psychoactive substance use.

Table 4.

Determinants of 12 month substance use

Variable Substance use Stat p-value OR:95% CI
Yes (%) No (%)
Gender
Male 225 (69.7) 98 (30.3) 1.28 (0.91 – 1.79)
Female 256 (58.2) 184 (41.8) χ2=10.5 <0.001* 1.00
Age (years)
18–22 283 (57.3) 211(42.7) 0.84 (0.38 – 1.84)
23–26 168 (74.3) 58 (25.7) 1.22 (0.54 – 2.75)
27–30 30 (69.8) 13 (30.2) χ2=20.2 <0.001* 1.00
Current marital status
Single 463(62.9) 273 (37.1) 0.80 (0.32 – 2.00)
Married 18 (66.7) 9 (33.3) χ2=0.2 0.69 1.00
Religion
Catholic 205 (67.2) 100 (32.8) 1.43* (1.03 – 1.99)
Others 276 (60.3) 182 (39.7) χ2=3.8 0.05 1.00
Year in school
100 106 (54.6) 88 (45.4) 0.72 (0.46 – 1.14)
200 116 (58.0) 84 (42.0) 0.79 (0.51 – 1.21)
300 124 (74.7) 42 (25.3) 1.56 (0.96–1.55)
400 135 (66.5) 68 (33.5) χ2=18.8 <0.001* 1.00
Place of residence
Lives with parents 80 (57.1) 60 (42.9) 1.00
Others 401 (64.4) 222 (35.6) χ2=2.6 0.11 1.09 (0.73 – 1.63)
Father's employment
status
Employed 369 (60.7) 239 (39.3) 0.64 (0.40 – 1.02)
Unemployed 100 (71.9) 39 (28.1) χ2=6.1 0.01* 1.00
Use by friends
Yes 315 (72.7) 118 (27.3) 1.94* (1.39 – 2.71)
No 166 (50.3) 164 (49.7) χ2=40.9 0.001* 1.00
Use by roommate
Yes 103 (87.3) 15 (12.7) 3.06* (1.62 – 5.78)
No 378 (58.6) 267 (41.4) χ2=35.2 <0.001 1.00
Use by brother
Yes 148 (74.7) 50 (25.3) 1.22 (0.77 – 1.93)
No 333 (58.9) 232 (41.1) χ2=15.7 <0.001* 1.00
Use by sister
Yes 55 (75.3) 18 (24.7) 0.72 (0.34 – 1.51)
No 426 (61.7) 264 (38.3) χ2=5.2 0.02* 1.00
Parental use
Yes 115 (75.2) 38 (24.8) 1.38 (0.84 – 2.27)
No 366 (60.0) 244 (40.0) χ2=12.1 <0.001* 1.00
Parental fights
Yes 33 (84.6) 6 (16.4) 2.43 (0.95 – 6.20)
No 448 (61.9) 276 (38.1) χ2=8.2 <0.001* 1.00
*

significant at p.0.05

Students who were Catholics (OR:1.43; 1.03 – 1.99), whose friends (OR:1.94; 1.39 – 2.71), roommates (OR:3.06; (1.62 – 5.78) or brother (OR:1.22; 0.77 - 1.93) used psychoactive substances were more likely to use psychoactive substance compared to their counterparts.

Discussion

A high rate of substance use was found in this study. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) had reported in 2018 that Imo state had substance use problems exceeding national estimates.22 The high rate reported in this study may be a reflection of this. It also indicates the worsening psychoactive substance use situation among undergraduates.

The rates of alcohol use in this study were twice the rates reported in a cross-sectional survey of drug use among the general Nigerian population.7 It was also higher than what has been previously reported1316 This indicates a worsening trend. The high prevalence of alcohol use may be related to its widespread acceptability and availability in society.

Cannabis was the most common illicit substance used.7,15, 22 However, the rate of use was 2.5 times lower than the estimated 10.8% and 10.9% reported among the general Nigerian and Imo state population respectively.22 Reasons for this may need to be further evaluated in future studies.

The rate of psychoactive substance use was higher among the male students. This is similar to what has been previously reported among undergraduates and in the general population in Nigeria.10, 13, 18, 22, 23, 24 This may be attributed to cultural factors which make psychoactive substance use more acceptable in males, and more opportunities for male psychoactive substance use.25 The high rate of alcohol use found in this study among females and the lack of significant difference in the lifetime use of alcohol between the genders show that this trend may be shifting. The high rate of female psychoactive substance use has been attributed to changing societal attitudes toward women, female incursion into previously male-dominated professions and females succumbing to peer pressure due to loss of parental control as a result of living away from the family.11, 26 This is buttressed by some studies in Nigeria which found a greater rate of substance use among females.9,11 This may however, be attributed to peculiarities in cultural norms and gender socialization patterns in the acceptability of psychoactive substance use by women.27

The greatest use of psychoactive substances was seen among those aged 23–26 years. There is similar reports of greater use among older youths.10, 11, 17, 18, 28 A general population study conducted in Nigeria found that the overall past-year use of most psychoactive substances was more among people within the age brackets of 25 and 39 years22 but in our study there was a reduced rate among those aged 27–30 years. Greater maturity can account for this. However, there are conflicting reports of greater use of psychoactive substances among the younger age group11 with alcohol, cigarette, and cannabis use being more common among younger persons but cocaine, and heroin use being more common among older persons.17 These, may be due to methodological differences, differences in substances studied, affordability and local preferences.

Similar to what was found in this study, substance use has been found to be least among those who live with relations (parents and extended family) and greatest among those who live in university hostels and off-campus.18 A similar finding was reported in a study carried out in Sudan which highlights the protective role of the family against negative peer influence.19 The lower rate among those who live with their relations may be due to improved supervision, authoritative and nurturing roles provided by the relations as opposed to too much freedom experienced while living alone.29 More attention has to be focused on the specific conditions in the hostels that could account for these difference and how to minimize them.

The family has a powerful influence on shaping the attitudes, values and behavior of children.30 There was greater use of substances among those whose family members (parents and siblings) used substances.11, 30, 31 This could be due to students imitating the behavior of their parents. Parents who use substances cannot effectively counsel their children against the use of substances.11, 29

Use by peers predicted the use of drugs.3, 11, 32 Peer influence has been reported to top the list for reasons for substance use.11 Need to belong and to be accepted by peers are part of the reasons for this. It has been reported that the influence of opposite-gender friends may be stronger than of same-gender friends especially in young adulthood, when mixed-gender relationships become more central.33 This needs to be further explored.

The rates reported in this study are slightly different from what has been observed in countries outside of Africa where a markedly higher use of nicotine, marijuana, solvents and cocaine has been reported.34, 35 Unlike what we reported, gender, financial background and academic variables were important factors in the use of psychoactive substances.34 But similar to what we reported, there was a very high rate of alcohol use.34 These differences could be attributed to local preferences and population sampled.

Limitations

The study was a cross-sectional non-population representative study. Its results cannot be generalized to the entire population. Also causality cannot be determined. Substance use was determined through self-report, so 100% reliability cannot be guaranteed due to possible recall bias.

Conclusion

There is a high rate of psychoactive substance use among the students. Age, religion, place of residence, family and peer use of substances are important determinants of psychoactive substance use.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization, author. Management of substance abuse. Psychoactive Substance. 2018. Retrieved from www.who.int/substance_abuse/terminology/psychoactive substances/en/
  • 2.Degenhardt L, Chiu WT, Sampson N, Kessler RC, Anthony JC, Angermeyer M, et al. Toward a global view of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and cocaine use: findings from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yusuf FA. Factors influencing substance abuse among undergraduate students in Osun State. African Research Review. 2010;4(17):330–340. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aluede O, Jimoh B, Agwinede BO, Omoregie EO. Student unrest in Nigerian universities: Looking Back and Forward. Journal of Social Sciences. 2005;10:17–22. PubMed. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lorant V, Nicaise P, Soto VE, d'Hoore W. Alcohol drinking among college students: College responsibility for personal troubles. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:615. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-615. PubMed. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lapsley DK, Edgerton J. Separation-individuation, adult attachment style, and college adjustment. Counseling & Development Journal. 2011;80(4):484–492. PubMed. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Adamson TA, Ogunlesi AO, Morakinyo O, Akinhanmi AO, Onifade PO, Erinosho O, et al. Descriptive national survey of substance use in Nigeria. Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy. 2015;6:234. doi: 10.4172/2155-6105.1000234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Babalola EO, Akinhanmi A, Ogunwale A. Who guards the guards: Drug use pattern among medical students in a Nigerian university. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research. 2014;4(3):397–403. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.133467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Owoaje ET, Bello J. Psychoactive substance use among undergraduate students of the university of Ibadan, Nigeria. Tropical Journal of Health Sciences. 2014;17:2. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Adeyemo FO, Ohaeri B, Okpala PU, Ogodo O. Prevalence of Drug Abuse Amongst University Students in Benin City, Nigeria. Public Health Research. 2016;6(2):31–37. doi: 10.5923/j.phr.20160602.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Johnson OE, Akpanekpo EI, Okonna EM, Adeboye SE, Udoh AJ. The prevalence and factors affecting psychoactive substance use among undergraduate students in university of Uyo, Nigeria. Journal of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care. 2017;29(2):11–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Akindutire IO, Adegboyega JA. Psychoactive substance consumption and awareness of health effects among students in tertiary institutions in Ekiti state, Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies. 2012;3(3):257–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ekwueme OE, Chukwuneke FN. Prevalence and behaviour effects of psychoactive substance use among university students in south-eastern Nigeria. Ebonyi Medical Journal. 2010;9:1. doi: 10.4314/ebomed.v9i1.62466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ebirim I, Morakinyo OM. Prevalence and perceived health effect of alcohol use among male undergraduate students in Owerri, South-East Nigeria: A descriptive cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-118. PubMed. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adelekan ML, Abiodun OA, Obayan AO, Oni G, Ogunremi OO. Prevalence and pattern of substance use among undergraduates in a Nigerian University. Drug and Alcohol dependence. 1992;29(3):255–261. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(92)90100-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Makanjuola AB, Daramola TO, Obembe AO. Psychoactive substance use among medical students in a Nigerian university. World Psychiatry. 2007;6(2):112–114. PubMed. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Adekeye OA, Adeusi SO, Chenube OO, Ahmadu FO, Sholarin MA. Assessment of alcohol and substance use among undergraduates in selected private universities in southwest Nigeria. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science. 2015;20(3):01–07. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Duru CB, Oluoha UR, Okafor CC, Diwe KC, Iwu AC, Aguocha CM, et al. Socio-demographic determinants of psychoactive substance use among students of tertiary institutions in Imo State, Nigeria. Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy. 2017;8:345. doi: 10.4172/2155-6105.1000345. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Osman T, Victor C, Abdulmoneim A, Mohammed H, Abdalla F, Ahmed A, et al. Epidemiology of substance use among university students in Sudan. Journal of Addiction. 2016 doi: 10.1155/2016/2476164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gebremariam TB, Mruts KB, Neway TK. Substance use and associated factors among Debre Berhan University students, Central Ethiopia. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2018;13:13. doi: 10.1186/s13011-018-0150-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Imo State University, author. 2019. [Internet]. [updated 2019; cited 2019 Aug 28]. Available from: https://www.imsu.edu.ng.
  • 22.United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime Vienna. Drug Use in Nigeria. [Internet] 2018. [updated 2018; cited 2019 Aug 28]. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/documents/nigeria//Drug Use Survey Nigeria 2019 BOOK.pdf.
  • 23.Onofa LU, Adamson T, Ighoroje M, Majekodunmi M. Prevalence and patterns of drug abuse among students of tertiary institutions in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Psychiatry. 2016;1:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH), author How Sex and Gender Influence Health and Disease [Infographic] [Internet]. n.d [updated n.d; cited 2019 Aug 28]. Available from: https://orwh.od.nih.gov/resources/pdf/SexGenderInfographic_11x17_508.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.National Institute on Drug abuse, author. Substance Use in Women: Sex and gender difference in substance use. [Internet] 2018. [updated n.d; cited 2019 Aug 28]. Available from: https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/substance-use-in-women/sex-gender-differences-in-substance-use. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brady KT, Randall CL. Gender differences in substance use disorders. Psychiatric Clinics in North America. 1999;22(2):241–252. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70074-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kulis S, Marsiglia FF, Ayers SL, Booth J, Nuño-Gutiérrez BL. Drug resistance and substance use among male and female adolescents in alternative secondary schools in Guanajuato, Mexico. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 2012;73(1):111–119. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kwan M, Bobko S, Faulkner G, Donnelly P, Cairney J. Sport participation and alcohol and illicit drug use in adolescents and young adults: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Addictive Behaviors. 2014;39:497–506. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.11.006. PubMed. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Maliki AE. Family background variables and Niger Delta University undergraduates' attitude towards drug abuse. International Journal of Research In Social Sciences. 2013;1:3. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Otieno AO, Ofulla AVO. Drug abuse in Kisumu town Western Kenya. African Journal of food Agriculture Nutrition and Development. 2000;9(3):846–858. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Aklog T, Tiruneh G, Tsegay G. Assessment of substance abuse and associated factors among students of Debre Markos Poly Technique College in Debre Markos town, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. Global Journal of Medical Research. 2013;13(4):4–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jorge KO, Ferreira RC, Ferreira EF, Kawachi I, Zarzar PM, Pordeus IA. Peer group influence and illicit drug use among adolescent students in Brazil: A cross-sectional study. Reports on Public Health. 2018;34(3):e00144316. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00144316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Humenssky JL. Are adolescents with high socioeconomic status more likely to engage in alcohol and illicit drug use in early adulthood? Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2010;5:19. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-5-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Maidana MS, Fernandes CL, Dumith SC, Silva FM. Prevalence and factors associated to the use of illicit drugs and psychotropic medications among brazilian undergraduates. Acta Scientiarum. Health Sciences. 2020;42 doi: 10.4025/actascihealthsci.v42i1.46774. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Papazisis G, Siafis S, Tsakiridis I, Koulas I, Dagklis T, Kouvelas D. Prevalence of Cannabis Use Among Medical Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment. 2018 Jan; doi: 10.1177/1178221818805977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Makerere University Medical School

RESOURCES