Skip to main content
African Health Sciences logoLink to African Health Sciences
. 2021 Jun;21(2):489–496. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i2.2

Co-existence of NDM-1 and OXA-48 genes in Carbapenem Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in Kafrelsheikh, Egypt

Ramadan Ahmed El-Domany 1, Tarek El-Banna 2, Fatma Sonbol 3, Samar Hamed Abu-Sayedahmed 4
PMCID: PMC8568246  PMID: 34795700

Abstract

Background

The noteworthy spread of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CR-KP) isolates represents a significant safety threat.

Objective

Determination of the carbapenemase genes incidence among CR-KP clinical isolates in Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.

Methods

A total of 230 K. pneumoniae isolates were recovered from four hospitals in Kafrelsheikh, Egypt. Susceptibility testing was conducted using Kirby-Bauer method and automated-Vitek2 system. CR-KP isolates were tested using modified Hodge test (MHT) and combined disk synergy test. PCR and DNA sequencing were conducted for CR-KP isolates to recognize the included carbapenemase-genes.

Results

Out of 230 K. pneumoniae isolates, 50 isolates presented resistance to carbapenem (meropenem). All 50 CR-KP isolates were multidrug-resistant (MDR). Genes like blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48 were the only detected genes among CR-KP with an incidence of 70.0% and 52.0%, respectively. Up to 74.0% of the tested isolates carried at least one of the two recorded genes, among them 48.0% co-harbored both blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48 genes. The accession-numbers of sequenced blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48 genes were MG594615 and MG594616, respectively.

Conclusion

This study reported a high incidence of MDR profile with the emergence of blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48 genes co-existence in CR-KP isolates in Kafrelsheikh, Egypt. Hence, more restrictions should be applied against the spread of such serious pathogens.

Keywords: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Egypt, carbapenem resistance, MDR, PCR, blaNDM-1, blaOXA-48, sequencing

Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) is a member in Enterobacteriaceae family causing serious opportunistic hospital and community-associated infections13. It is known as one of the most common MDR pathogens showing resistance to different classes of antibiotics additionally with multiple mechanisms of antibiotic resistance due to easily acquisition of drug resistance genes through transferable elements (plasmids and transposons) 46. Moreover, the infections caused by those serious pathogens are often concomitant with prolonged hospitalization and high mortality rates7, 8.

The significant spread of MDR K. pneumoniae all over the world has led to extensive use of carbapenem as last-resort antibiotics for treating the infections caused by those pathogens. Unfortunately, the emergence of carbapenem resistance among K. pneumoniae has been reported all over the world7. Among mechanisms of resistance, production of carbapenem hydrolyzing enzymes (carbapenemases) is considered as the most common mechanism of carbapenem resistance and a significant cause of worry in the Middle East and worldwide913.

Carbapenemases are β-lactamase enzymes belonging to classes A, B, C and D and can be categorized according to the dependency on divalent cations for the activation of the enzyme into metallo-carbapenemases, MBLs, (zinc-dependent class B) and non-metallo-carbapenemases (zinc-independent classes A, C, and D). The most commonly detected carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae are KPC (Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase); GES (Guiana extended-spectrum); VIM (Verona integron encoded metallo-β-lactamase); IMP (imipenemase), NDM (New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase) and OXA-48 (oxacillinase-48)14.

Regarding the remarkable increase in carbapenem resistance among K. pneumoniae isolates, the world nowadays is concerned about screening for those carbapenemase-producing strains. In Egypt, there were several studies about carbapenem resistance, however, some information was known about carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae from Delta region. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the incidence of carbapenem resistance-associated genes in CR-KP clinical isolates in Kafrelsheikh city, Egypt.

Material and Methods

Bacterial isolates

A total of 230 non-duplicated K. pneumoniae clinical isolates were recovered from 1005 different clinical samples that were collected during the period from July 2015 to April 2016 from hospitalized patients in different four hospitals in Kafrelsheikh city; Egypt. The K. pneumoniae isolates were recovered from urine (n = 98), blood (n =67), sputum (n = 55) and wound (n = 10).

Bacterial identification

The collected isolates were identified according to Collee et al.15 using conventional standard biochemical tests including culturing on MacConkey agar, indole test, citrate utilization, urease test, oxidase reaction, methyl red test, and sugar fermentation. Besides, all isolates which were identified as K. pneumoniae were confirmed by the automated Vitek2® compact system (BioMérieux®). The recovered isolates were stored in 50.0 % glycerol stock at -80 °C for further analysis.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was conducted for all 230 K. pneumoniae isolates using Mueller-Hinton agar and the results were recorded in accordance with CLSI 201516 guidelines. The used antimicrobial discs (Oxoid; UK) included beta-lactams as ampicillin (10µg), amoxicillin (10µg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10µg), ampicillin/sulbactam (10/10µg), ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (75/10µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10µg), meropenem (10µg), imipenem (10µg), cefoxitin (30µg), cefotetan (30µg), cefazolin (30µg), cefuroxime (30µg), ceftriaxone (30µg), cefotaxime (30µg), ceftazidime (30µg), cefepime (30µg), aztreonam (30µg); aminoglycosides as gentamicin (10µg), tobramycin (10µg), amikacin (30µg) and other antimicrobials including chloramphenicol (30µg), ciprofloxacin (5µg), tetracycline (30µg) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75µg),. Susceptibility to tigecycline was detected using Vitek2® compact system (BioMérieux®). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were detected for all CR-KP isolates using Vitek2® compact system (BioMérieux®). Any isolate would be recorded to have MDR profile if it showed non-susceptibility to ≥3 different antimicrobial classes4.

Phenotypic detection of carbapenemases

All 50 CR-KP isolates were screened for carbapenemases production using MHT 16. MBLs were screened in all 50 CR-KP isolates using EDTA combined disc synergy test17, 18.

Genotypic detection and characterization of carbapenemase genes by polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing

For genomic DNA extraction, GeneJET Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific, USA) was used. For all carbapenem non-susceptible isolates, PCR was performed to detect six of the most frequently widespread carbapenemase genes including blaKPC, blaGES, blaNDM-1, blaVIM, blaIMP and blaOXA-48.

The PCR technique was carried out, using the primers shown in Table 1, in a final volume of 50 µl consisting of 5 µl of DNA template (5–20 ng/ml); 25 µl of PCR master mix; 2.5 µl of forward and 2.5 µl of reverse primer (0.1–0.5 µM) and nuclease-free water (15 µl) was added to complete the final volume.

Table 1.

Nucleotide sequences of PCR oligonucleotide primers

Target
gene
Primer* Sequence (5′ 3′) Size
(bp)
Reference
bla KPC KPC-F
KPC-R
CGTCTAGTTCTGCTGTCTTG
CTTGTCATCCTTGTTAGGCG
798 Poirel,
Laurent,201120
bla GES GES-F
GES-R
AGTCGGCTAGACCGGAAAG
TTTGTCCGTGCTCAGGAT
399 Dallenne,
Caroline,201019
bla NDM-1 NDM-F
NDM-R
GGTTTGGCGATCTGGTTTTC
CGGAATGGCTCATCACGATC
621 Poirel,
Laurent,201120
bla VIM VIM-F
VIM-R
GATGGTGTTTGGTCGCATA
CGAATGCGCAGCACCAG
390 Poirel,
Laurent,201120
bla IMP IMP-F
IMP-R
GGAATAGAGTGGCTTAAYTCTC
GGTTTAAYAAAACAACCACC
232 Poirel,
Laurent,201120
bla OXA-48 OXA-F
OXA-R
GCGTGGTTAAGGATGAACAC
CATCAAGTTCAACCCAACCG
438 Poirel,
Laurent,201120
*

F: forward; R: reverse

The amplification was performed in the thermal cycler (Verti; Applied Biosystem) with initial denaturation for 10 min at 94°C. After denaturation, about 36 cycles of amplification were conducted including 30 s for denaturation at 94°C, 40 s for annealing at 52°C, and 50 s for extension at 72°C and the last step was the final elongation for 5 min at 72°C. DNA fragments were analyzed under UV light after 1 hour of agarose gel electrophoresis19,20.

The PCR Purification Kit (#PP-201S; Jena Bioscience, Germany) was used, according to the manufacturer's protocol, for purification of PCR products. For DNA sequencing, the purified PCR products were sent to Macrogen Company (South Korea) and sequenced using ABI 3730XL DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystem; USA). The analysis of obtained sequences was performed using the Chromas Lite 2.1 program, BLAST search was used to detect the identity of these sequences against Gen-Bank database and Geneious 4.8.4 software was used for alignments and assembly of the sequences.

Results

The results of the standard biochemical tests, as well as the Vitek2® compact system revealed the presence of 230 K. pneumoniae isolates among the tested 1005 clinical samples.

The susceptibility testing results of the recovered 230 K. pneumoniae isolates revealed that the incidence of resistance among these isolates ranged from (0.0%) for tigecycline to (98.3%) for ampicillin. The results indicated that 21.7% of isolates were carbapenem non-susceptible where 50 isolates were meropenem resistant while for imipenem; 49 isolates were resistant and only one was intermediate resistant to such antimicrobial agent. On the other hand, 175 (76.0%), 161 (70.0%) and 138 (60.0%) isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, amikacin and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole respectively. Interestingly, all tested isolates were tigecycline sensitive. Moreover, all detected CR-KP isolates exhibited MDR profile.

Phenotypic detection of carbapenemases production was carried out using MHT and the results revealed that 45 (90.0%) out of 50 tested CR-KP isolates were carbapenemase producers. On the other hand, 33 (66.0%) out of 50 tested isolates were MBLs producers as detected by combined disk synergy test as shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Phenotypic and genotypic characterizations of tested carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

Isolates Sensitivity pattern* Carbapenemases detection

Phenotypic results** Genotypic results

MHT CDST bla NDM-1 bla OXA-48
K1 CN, SXT, TGC + - _ _
K2 AK, SXT, TGC + - _ _
K3, K6, K15, K16, K17, K22, K23,
K24, K27, K32, K34, K35, K38, K42,
K47, K49, K50
SXT, TGC + + bla NDM-1 bla OXA-48
K4 CIP, TGC + - _ bla OXA-48
K5 CIP, TGC - - _ _
K7 CN, AK, CM, TET, CIP, SXT, TGC - + bla NDM-1 bla OXA-48
K8 SXT, TGC + - bla NDM-1 _
K9 CN, AK, TGC + + bla NDM-1 _
K10, K11, K12, K14, K18, K20, K21 SXT, TGC + - _ _
K13 CN, AK, CM, TET, CIP, TGC + - _ _
K19 AK, CM, TET, CIP, SXT, TGC + + bla NDM-1 _
K25 CN, AK, CM, TET, CIP, SXT, TGC + - _ _
K26 AK, TET, CIP, SXT, TGC - + bla NDM-1 bla OXA-48
K28, K40 SXT, TGC + + bla NDM-1 _
K29 CN, AK, TET, CIP, TGC + + bla NDM-1 _
K30 AK, TGC + - _ _
K31 CN, AK, , CIP, TGC + + bla NDM-1 bla OXA-48
K33 AK, TET, CIP, TGC + + bla NDM-1 bla OXA-48
K36 TGC + - bla NDM-1 bla OXA-48
K37, K39 CIP, TGC + + bla NDM-1 _
K41 CN, AK, CM, TET, CIP, TGC + + bla NDM-1 _
K43 CIP, TGC + + bla NDM-1 bla OXA-48
K44 AK, CIP, SXT, TGC + + bla NDM-1 bla OXA-48
K45 SXT, TGC - - _ bla OXA-48
K46 AK, SXT, TGC + + bla NDM-1 _
K48 AK, CIP, SXT, TGC - + bla NDM-1 _

All CR-KP isolates were screened by PCR for the detection of blaKPC, blaGES, blaNDM-1, blaVIM, blaIMP and blaOXA-48 genes. The results revealed that blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48 were the only detected genes where blaNDM-1 was detected in 35 (70.0%) isolates while blaOXA-48 was detected in 26 (52.0%) isolates. Besides, up to 37 (74.0%) isolates carried at least one of the recorded genes where 24 isolates harbored both detected genes while 13 isolates harbored only one of these genes as shown in Table 2.

Discussion

The incidence of CR-KP isolates in the Mediterranean area particularly in Egypt represents a serious threat to our hospitals and our community21. Therefore, this study was performed to detect the prevalence of carbapenemase genes among K. pneumoniae isolates recovered from Egyptian patients in different hospitals in Kafrelsheikh city, Egypt. Our results revealed that the incidence of K. pneumoniae isolates among different clinical samples was 22.8%. Susceptibility testing results showed that up to 21.7% of the tested K. pneumoniae isolates were carbapenem non-susceptible. In agreement with our result, previous studies from Egypt22 and different countries23 showed comparable results.

The antimicrobial susceptibility testing results of CR-KP isolates showed a high incidence of MDR profile where all tested isolates exhibited multiple antimicrobial resistance, a finding that was also reported in other studies from different countries2427. This finding might reflect unrestricted use of antibiotics in our institute which plays an important role in increasing antibiotic resistance. It worth mentioning that tigecycline was the most active antimicrobial agent where all tested isolates were sensitive to it. This result was confirmed by the results of other studies2830 which also reported 100% sensitivity of the isolates to tigecycline.

In the present study, the detection of carbapenemase producers was carried out using phenotypic and genotypic methods. Regarding the phenotypic methods, our results revealed that 90.0% of CR-KP isolates were carbapenemase producers. Moreover, the results revealed that 66.0% of tested isolates were MBLs producers and this result was comparable (63.3%) with that detected by Panchal et al.23 but in contrast, lower (41.9%) result was detected in another study which was performed in Saudi Arabia31.

The results of genotypic detection methods revealed that 74.0% (37/50) of CR-KP isolates were harboring to carbapenemase genes which was higher than that reported in other Egyptian study32 where carbapenemase genes were detected in only 43.0% K. pneumoniae isolates. Interestingly, out of the 37 isolates carrying carbapenemase genes that detected by PCR, there were 4 isolates that showed negative results by MHT and this might be explained by weak carbapenemase activity33. On the other hand, 13 (26.0%) of the CR-KP isolates were negative for carbapenemase genes. These isolates may contain other untested carbapenemases or other mechanisms such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production coupled with disruption in porin expression may be responsible for their reduced sensitivity to carbapenems3436.

Enterobacteriaceae particularly K. pneumoniae producing blaOXA-48 and blaNDM-1 became more prevalent in diverse of the world. In our study, blaOXA-48 and blaNDM-1 were the only detected carbapenemase genes among the tested K. pneumoniae isolates. This result was in agreement with other performed studies in Egypt36, 37; revealing the emergence of the dissemination and rapid spread of these genes through different regions in Egypt. In addition, our result was also reported in other countries 38, 39. Since the first identification of blaNDM-1 from K. pneumoniae retrieved from a Swedish patient of Indian origin traveled to New Delhi, India 40, worldwide attention was attracted due to the rapid dissemination of the MBLs. In Egypt, the first isolation of blaNDM-1 was reported by Abdelaziz et al.41 from ST11 K. pneumoniae isolate that was recovered from a hospitalized patient in an ICU of a cancer hospital in Cairo and after that blaNDM-1 was described in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates by Zafer et al.42 and in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates by El-Sayed et al.43 revealing the spread of blaNDM-1 among Enterobacteriaceae particularly K. pneumoniae isolates44. In the present study, blaNDM-1 was identified as a predominant gene and detected in 70.0% of the tested isolates. This finding was consistent with other studies that recorded the predominance of blaNDM-1 in Egypt and other countries4549.

Regarding the blaOXA-48 gene, it was first detected in K. pneumoniae in Turkey50 and after that, it spread rapidly throughout the Middle East and then all over the world. In the present study, our results revealed that the second most common carbapenemase gene detected among tested isolates was blaOXA-48 with an incidence of 52.0%. In accordance with our result, Khalifa et al.36 and ELMahallawy et al.37 from Egypt reported comparable (49.0% and 60.0%, respectively) detection rate of blaOXA-48 among carbapenem-resistant isolates. In other Arabian countries, this detected gene was also reported as one of the most detected carbapenemases genes with high incidence such as 66.0% incidence in Riyadh31 and 62.0% incidence in Lebanon51.

Carbapenem-resistant isolates co-producing multiple carbapenemases genes tend to be extremely high resistant and this leads to limitation in treatment options. Our study showed that 48.0% of tested CR-KP isolates harbored both blaOXA-48 and blaNDM-1, a finding that is considered as the first report of a high incidence of blaOXA-48 and blaNDM-1 co-existence among CR-KP isolates in Egypt. In agreement with our detection rate, Laolerd et al.52 reported also 52.0% as an incidence of isolates that also harbored those both genes. In contrast, neither blaKPC, blaGES, blaVIM nor blaIMP was detected in any of our tested isolates. Other studies also showed very low detection rates of these genes as EL-Mahallawy et al.37 who reported that the incidence of blaIMP was only 1.5% with the absence of blaKPC and blaVIM among the tested isolates. Additionally, Khalifa et al.36 reported a low (4.6 %) incidence rate of blaVIM with the absence of blaKPC and blaIMP. In accordance with our results, Al-Agamy et al.31 also reported the absence of blaIMP, blaVIM, blaGES and blaKPC in the carbapenemase-positive isolates confirming that those genes are not predominate in our geographical region.

Conclusion

This study reported a high MDR resistance profile among the CR-KP isolates from Kafrelsheikh, Egypt. This high resistance rate in our study may be attributed to the lack of implementation of antimicrobial stewardship program and this reflects also limiting in treatment options. In addition, our study reported the emergence of K. pneumoniae isolates co-harboring blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48 genes. These findings may be considered as an alarming threat to the healthcare workers in the hospital settings. The results of our study therefore confirmed the need for continually and routinely screening for K. pneumoniae strains especially those producing blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48 genes to rapidly detect and avoid the dissemination of those strains.

Authors' contributions

Conception and design: R.A.E.; Acquisition of data/isolates: S.H.A; Data analysis and interpretation: R.A.E. and S.H.A; drafting the article: R.A.E. and S.H.A: Critical revision of the article: R.A.E., F.S., and T.E.; and all authors read and approved the final article.

Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  • 1.Rice LB. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: no ESKAPE. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2008;197(8):1079–1081. doi: 10.1086/533452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS, Edwards JE, Gilbert D, Rice LB, et al. Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2009;48(1):1–12. doi: 10.1086/595011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pendleton JN, Gorman SP, Gilmore BF. Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 2013;11(3):297–308. doi: 10.1586/eri.13.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clinical Microbiology and Infection: The Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2012;18(3):268–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pournaras S, Poulou A, Voulgari E, Vrioni G, Kristo I, Tsakris A. Detection of the new metallo-β-lactamase VIM-19 along with KPC-2, CMY-2 and CTX-M-15 in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2010;65(8):1604–1607. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Navon-Venezia S, Kondratyeva K, Carattoli A. Klebsiella pneumoniae: a major worldwide source and shuttle for antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2017;41(3):252–275. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee CR, Lee JH, Park KS, Kim YB, Jeong BC, Lee SH. Global Dissemination of Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: Epidemiology, Genetic Context, Treatment Options, and Detection Methods. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:895. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Calfee DP. Recent advances in the understanding and management of Klebsiella pneumoniae. F1000Research. 2017;6:1760. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11532.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jeong SH, Lee KM, Lee J, Bae IK, Kim J-S, Kim H-S, et al. Clonal and horizontal spread of the blaOXA-232 gene among Enterobacteriaceae in a Korean hospital. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2015;82(1):70–72. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chouchani C, Marrakchi R, El Salabi A. Evolution of β-lactams resistance in Gram-negative bacteria in Tunisia. Critical reviews in microbiology. 2011;37(3):167–177. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2011.552880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hrabák J, Chudáčková E, Papagiannitsis C. Detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: a challenge for diagnostic microbiological laboratories. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2014;20(9):839–853. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nordmann P, Poirel L. The difficult-to-control spread of carbapenemase producers among Enterobacteriaceae worldwide. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2014;20(9):821–830. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mathlouthi N, Al-Bayssari C, El Salabi A, Bakour S, Ben Gwierif S, Zorgani AA, et al. Carbapenemases and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases producing Enterobacteriaceae isolated from Tunisian and Libyan hospitals. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2016;10(7):718–727. doi: 10.3855/jidc.7426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Findlay J, Hopkins KL, Alvarez-Buylla A, Meunier D, Mustafa N, Hill R, et al. Characterization of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the West Midlands region of England: 2007–14. Journal of Antimicrobial and Chemotherapy. 2017;72:1054–1062. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Collee JG, Mackie TJ, McCartney JE. Mackie & McCartney practical medical microbiology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Patel J, Cockerill F, Bradford P. M100-S25. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fifth Informational Supplement. 3. Vol. 35. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015. [19 de junio de 2017]. pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee K, Chong Y, Shin H, Kim Y, Yong D, Yum J. Modified Hodge and EDTA-disk synergy tests to screen metallo-β-lactamase-producing strains of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2001;7(2):88–91. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2001.00204.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee K, Lim Y, Yong D, Yum J, Chong Y. Evaluation of the Hodge test and the imipenem-EDTA double-disk synergy test for differentiating metallo-β-lactamase-producing isolates of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003;41(10):4623–4629. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4623-4629.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dallenne C, Da Costa A, Decré D, Favier C, Arlet G. Development of a set of multiplex PCR assays for the detection of genes encoding important β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2010;65(3):490–495. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Poirel L, Walsh TR, Cuvillier V, Nordmann P. Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2011;70(1):119–123. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Girmenia C, Serrao A, Canichella M. Epidemiology of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in mediterranean countries. Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases. 2016;8(1) doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2016.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.El-Badawy MF, Tawakol WM, El-Far SW, Maghrabi IA, Al-Ghamdi SA, Mansy MS, et al. Molecular Identification of Aminoglycoside-Modifying Enzymes and Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance Genes among Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates Recovered from Egyptian Patients. International Journal of Microbiology. 2017;2017:8050432. doi: 10.1155/2017/8050432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Panchal CA, Oza SS, Mehta SJ. Comparison of four phenotypic methods for detection of metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria in rural teaching hospital. Journal of Laboratory Physicians. 2017;9(2):81–83. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.199624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aljanaby AAJ, Alhasani AHA. Virulence factors and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of multidrug resistance Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from different clinical infections. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2016;10(22):829–843. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Aljanaby AAJ, Alhasnawi H. Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Multidrug Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Different Clinical Sources in Al-Najaf Province-Iraq. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences: PJBS. 2017;20(5):217–232. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2017.217.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zheng B, Dai Y, Liu Y, Shi W, Dai E, Han Y, et al. Molecular epidemiology and risk factors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in Eastern China. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:1061. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Saadatian Farivar A, Nowroozi J, Eslami G, Sabokbar A. RAPD PCR Profile, Antibiotic Resistance, Prevalence of armA Gene, and Detection of KPC Enzyme in Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates. The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology = Journal Canadien des Maladies Infectieuses et de la Microbiologie Medicale. 2018;2018:6183162. doi: 10.1155/2018/6183162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gamal D, Fernandez-Martinez M, Salem D, El-Defrawy I, Montes LA, Ocampo-Sosa AA, et al. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Egypt containing blaNDM-1 on IncR plasmids and its association with rmtF. International Journal of Infectious Diseases: IJID: official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2016;43:17–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mesbah MR, Zaki MES, Alsayed MAL. Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction for Klebsiella pneumoniae Metallo-β-lactamase Causing Neonatal Sepsis in Mansoura Children University Hospital in Egypt. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Scinces. 2016;5(3):194–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Aqel AA, Giakkoupi P, Alzoubi H, Masalha I, Ellington MJ, Vatopoulos A. Detection of OXA-48-like and NDM carbapenemases producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Jordan: A pilot study. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2017;10(2):150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2016.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Al-Agamy MH, Aljallal A, Radwan HH, Shibl AM. Characterization of carbapenemases, ESBLs, and plasmid-mediated quinolone determinants in carbapenem-insensitive Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Riyadh hospitals. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2018;11(1):64–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hamdy Mohammed el S, Elsadek Fakhr A, Mohammed El Sayed H, Al Johery SA, Abdel Ghani Hassanein W. Spread of TEM, VIM, SHV, and CTX-M beta-Lactamases in Imipenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated from Egyptian Hospitals. International Journal of Microbiology. 2016;2016:8382605. doi: 10.1155/2016/8382605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Miriagou V, Cornaglia G, Edelstein M, Galani I, Giske CG, Gniadkowski M, et al. Acquired carbapenemases in Gram-negative bacterial pathogens: detection and surveillance issues. Clinical Microbiology and Infection: The Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2010;16(2):112–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03116.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Memish ZA, Assiri A, Almasri M, Roshdy H, Hathout H, Kaase M, et al. Molecular characterization of carbapenemase production among gram-negative bacteria in saudi arabia. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2015;21(3):307–314. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2014.0121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.El-Kholy AA, Elanany MG, Sherif MM, Gad MA. High Prevalence of VIM, KPC, and NDM Expression among Surgical Site Infection Pathogens in Patients Having Emergency Surgery. Surgical Infections. 2018;19(6):629–633. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Khalifa HO, Soliman AM, Ahmed AM, Shimamoto T, Hara T, Ikeda M, et al. High Carbapenem Resistance in Clinical Gram-Negative Pathogens Isolated in Egypt. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2017;23(7):838–844. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2015.0339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.ElMahallawy HA, Zafer MM, Amin MA, Ragab MM, Al-Agamy MH. Spread of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae at tertiary care cancer hospital in Egypt. Infectious Diseases. 2018;50(7):560–564. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2018.1428824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Osei Sekyere J, Govinden U, Bester LA, Essack SY. Colistin and tigecycline resistance in carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria: emerging resistance mechanisms and detection methods. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2016;121(3):601–617. doi: 10.1111/jam.13169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zeinab J, Ali HA, Mehri H, Jalil K-Y, Sirous J, Fereshteh J, et al. Molecular Epidemiology and Drug Resistance Pattern of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Iran. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2019;25(3):336–343. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yong D, Toleman MA, Giske CG, Cho HS, Sundman K, Lee K, et al. Characterization of a new metallo-β-lactamase gene, blaNDM-1, and a novel erythromycin esterase gene carried on a unique genetic structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 14 from India. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2009;53(12):5046–5054. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00774-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Abdelaziz MO, Bonura C, Aleo A, Fasciana T, Mammina C. NDM-1- and OXA-163-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in Cairo, Egypt, 2012. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance. 2013;1(4):213–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zafer MM, Amin M, El Mahallawy H, Ashour MSE-D, Al Agamy M. First report of NDM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Egypt. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2014;29:80–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.El-Sayed MAE-G, Amin MA, Tawakol WM, Loucif L, Bakour S, Rolain J-M. High prevalence of blaNDM-1 carbapenemase-encoding gene and 16SrRNA armA Methyltransferase among Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates, Egypt. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2015 doi: 10.1128/AAC.04412-14. AAC. 04412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Khalil MA, Elgaml A, El-Mowafy M. Emergence of multidrug-resistant New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Egypt. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2017;23(4):480–487. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2016.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Barwa R, Shaaban M. Molecular Characterization of Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates with Elevated Resistance to Carbapenems. The Open Microbiology Journal. 2017;11:152–159. doi: 10.2174/1874285801711010152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Abdulall AK, Tawfick MM, El Manakhly AR, El Kholy A. Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections in three intensive care units in Egypt. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases: official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology. 2018;37(9):1647–1652. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3294-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hosseinzadeh Z, Ebrahim-Saraie HS, Sarvari J, Mardaneh J, Dehghani B, Rokni-Hosseini SMH, et al. Emerge of blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48-like harboring carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from hospitalized patients in southwestern Iran. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2018;81(6):536–540. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ahmad N, Ali SM, Khan AU. Molecular characterization of novel sequence type of carbapenem-resistant New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in the neonatal intensive care unit of an Indian hospital. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2019;53(4):525–529. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Stewardson AJ, Marimuthu K, Sengupta S, Allignol A, El-Bouseary M, Carvalho MJ, et al. Effect of carbapenem resistance on outcomes of bloodstream infection caused by Enterobacteriaceae in low-income and middle-income countries (PANORAMA): a multinational prospective cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2019;19(6):601–610. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30792-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Poirel L, Héritier C, Tolün V, Nordmann P. Emergence of oxacillinase-mediated resistance to imipenem in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2004;48(1):15–22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.1.15-22.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Arabaghian H, Salloum T, Alousi S, Panossian B, Araj GF, Tokajian S. Molecular Characterization of Carbapenem Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella quasipneumoniae Isolated from Lebanon. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):531. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36554-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Laolerd W, Akeda Y, Preeyanon L, Ratthawongjirakul P, Santanirand P. Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae from Bangkok, Thailand, and Their Detection by the Carba NP and Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method Tests. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2018;24(7):1006–1011. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2018.0080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Makerere University Medical School

RESOURCES