Skip to main content
Stem Cells International logoLink to Stem Cells International
. 2021 Oct 28;2021:8874360. doi: 10.1155/2021/8874360

The Role of RNA Methylation in Regulating Stem Cell Fate and Function-Focus on m6A

Weiwei Sun 1, Bin Zhang 2, Qingli Bie 2, Na Ma 1, Na Liu 1, Zewei Shao 1,
PMCID: PMC8568546  PMID: 34745269

Abstract

The biological role of RNA methylation in stem cells has attracted increasing attention. Recent studies have demonstrated that RNA methylation plays a crucial role in self-renewal, differentiation, and tumorigenicity of stem cells. In this review, we focus on the biological role of RNA methylation modifications including N6-methyladenosine, 5-methylcytosine, and uridylation in embryonic stem cells, adult stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, and cancer stem cells, so as to provide new insights into the potential innovative treatments of cancer or other complex diseases.

1. Introduction

More than 150 types of RNA modifications have been identified, and they are widely distributed among various types of RNA, such as messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), microRNA (miRNA), and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) [1]. RNA methylation is one of the most crucial modifications, which mainly includes N6-methyladenosine (m6A), 5-methylcytosine (m5C), and uridylation (U-tail) [1, 2]. In general, RNA methylation has distinct functions in different types of RNA. Stem cells are a group of cells with self-renewal and multidirectional differentiation potential [3]. They are the core constituent of regenerative medicine and have been widely used in the treatment of various diseases, such as nervous system, immune system, and hematopoietic diseases [4]. Recent studies have shown that RNA methylation plays a crucial role in the self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells and tumorigenicity of cancer stem cells (CSCs) [5].

Among the RNA methylation modifications, m6A is one of the most abundant modifications in eukaryotes, and the epitranscriptomic detection technology has been focused on m6A, making it the most in-depth modification in stem cells. However, perhaps due to the lack of effective methods for detecting other RNA modification sites, the research on m5C and U-tail in stem cells is limited. This review summarizes the molecular mechanisms of RNA methylation and the biological functions of RNA methylation in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), adult stem cells (ASCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and CSCs, with a focus on m6A.

2. RNA Methylation Modifications

RNA methylation modifications mainly include m6A, m5C, and U-tail, and their molecular mechanisms are summarized as follows.

m6A is one of the most abundant modifications in mRNA and lncRNA, which was first discovered in the 1970s [6, 7]. m6A accounts for approximately 0.1%–0.4% of adenosines and 50% of total methylated ribonucleotides in mammalian RNA [8]. The m6A modification is dynamically reversible and mainly occurs in RRACH (R represents A or G and H represents A, U, or C) sequences [8]. Three key factors are involved in m6A modification, including “writers,” “erasers,” and “readers.” “Writers” mediate the RNA methylation process, which is a methyltransferase complex composed of three core components: methyltransferase-like (METTL) 3, METTL14, and Wilms' tumor 1-associating protein (WTAP) [9, 10]. In addition, zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13 (ZC3H13), RNA-binding motif 15 (RBM15), virilizer-like m6A methyltransferase associated (VIRMA), Cb1 protooncogene-like 1 (CBLL1), KIAA1429, and HAKAI are involved in RNA methylation as auxiliary elements [911]. METTL5 has recently been identified as an RNA methyltransferase, which catalyzes m6A in 18S rRNA [12]. “Erasers” mediate the demethylation of RNA. Fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) and alkylated DNA repair protein alkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5) are two main demethylases currently known [9]. “Readers” are responsible for “reading” the information of RNA methylation modification and participating in the translation, degradation, and other processes of downstream RNA [13]. YT521-B homology domain-containing family (YTHDF) (including YTHDF1, YTHDF2, YTHDF3, YTHDC1, and YTHDC2), the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) family (HNRNPA2B1, HNRNPC, and HNRNPG), insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 1~3 (IGF2BP1~3), and eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (EIF3) are m6A binding proteins [1315]. Although m6A may block nonstandard A:G base pairing and affect RNA structure, it does not alter the coding ability or base pairing of adenine with uracil or thymine [8]. In addition, the occurrence of m6A may affect the expression level, translation efficiency, nuclear retention, splicing, and stability of RNA [10, 14]. m6A is closely related to human obesity, cancer, and other diseases and participates in the regulation of circadian rhythm, cell meiosis, cell reprogramming, stem cell proliferation, and other biological processes [6, 8, 16, 17].

In addition to m6A, m5C is another methylated modification form widely present in RNA [18, 19]. It is a crucial regulator of RNA export, ribosome assembly, translation, RNA stability, and other crucial biological processes [2024]. m5C methyltransferases mainly include tRNA methyltransferase 4 (TRM4), tRNA aspartic acid methyltransferase 1 (TRDMT1), and the NOL1/NOP2/SUN domain (NSUN) family [20, 21, 25, 26]. However, enzymes capable of reversing m5C methylation have not been found in RNA. Although the demethylation of RNA m5C may be catalyzed by Tet, further verification is required [27]. ALYREF and Y-box binding protein 1 (YBX1) act as readers to specifically recognize m5C modification [28, 29].

U-tail, first identified in the 1970s [2], can promote the degradation of RNA, affect its processing, and change its pathway or activity [3032]. U-tail “writers” are mainly terminal uridylyltransferases (TUTs) [2, 32, 33]. TUT4 (also known as ZCCHC11 and TENT3A) and TUT7 (ZCCHC6 or TENT3B) were identified as two important TUTases involved in mRNA degradation [32]. Whether deuridase as an “eraser” plays a regulatory role in the process of U-tail remains unclear. The 3′–5′ exonuclease DIS3L2 and Lsm1-7 complex may be the “readers” or “effectors” for selective U-tail recognition [2]. U-tail, associated with many human diseases, such as cancer and cardiac myotonic dystrophy, plays a vital role in virus immune defense and early vertebrate development [2, 30, 33].

The discovery of RNA methyl modifiers and binding proteins and their involvement in the metabolic processing of RNA suggest that RNA methylation has crucial biological functions.

3. m6A and Embryonic Stem Cells

The dynamic regulation of m6A modification is essential for the pluripotency, self-renewal, and differentiation of ESCs (Table 1).

Table 1.

RNA methylation regulators and their functions in different types of stem cells.

Stem cell types RNA methylation Writer Eraser Reader Related function Reference
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) m6A METTL14 ESC stemness and differentiation [35]
m6A
m6A
m6A
METTL3
METTL3, WTAP
METTL5
Naive pluripotency
ESC differentiation
ESC pluripotency and differentiation
[36]
[37]
[12, 38]
m6A WTAP-Virilizer-Hakai ESC self-renewal and differentiation [39]
m6A METTL3-METTL14-WTAP Early cell fate determination and pluripotency [70]
m6A FTO ESC pluripotency [40]
m6A YTHDF3 ESC pluripotency [41]
m6A METTL3 YTHDC1 Chromatin accessibility and transcription [42]
m6A YTHDF1/2/3 ESC differentiation [43]
m5C NSUN3 ESC proliferation and differentiation [94]
U-tail DIS3L2 ESC differentiation [101]

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) m6A METTL3 Cell differentiation and cell proliferation
Endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition
The maintenance of HSC identity and symmetric commitment
[47, 4951]
m6A YTHDF2 Endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition
HSC self-renewal
[51, 52]
m6A METTL14 Terminal myeloid differentiation of normal HSPCs [53]

Neural stem cells (NSCs) m6A METTL3 Proliferation and differentiation of adult NSCs
Neuronal development and neurogenesis
[55]
m6A METTL14 NSC proliferation and differentiation [57]
m6A FTO Proliferation and neuronal differentiation of adult NSCs [58, 59]
m6A YTHDF2 Self-renewal, proliferation, and differentiation of NSCs [60]
m5C NSUN2 Migration and differentiation of neuroepithelial stem and progenitor cells [95]

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) m6A METTL3 BMSC differentiation [6266]
m6A FTO MSC differentiation [67]
m6A YTHDF2 Adipogenesis [62]

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) m6A METTL3 YTHDF1/YTHDF2 Self-renewal and pluripotency of iPSCs [69, 72]
m6A METTL3-METTL14-WTAP Early cell fate determination and pluripotency [70]
YTHDF2
YTHDF3
iPSC reprogramming [71]
U-tail TUT7 The neural differentiation of primed PSCs [98]

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) m6A METTL3 Myeloid leukemia cell differentiation and apoptosis
Maintenance of the leukemic state
Colorectal CSC stemness phenotype and metastasis of CRC
GSC maintenance and dedifferentiation of glioma cells
GSC growth, self-renewal, and tumor progression
[47, 74, 78, 8083]
m6A METTL14 Development and maintenance of AML self-renewal of leukemia stem and initiation cells
GSC growth, self-renewal, and tumor progression
[53, 83]
m6A YTHDF2 The overall integrity of LSC function
GSC growth
[77, 88]
m6A YTHDF1 CRC CSC marker expression
GBM tumorigenesis
[79, 87]
m6A ALKBH5 LSC self-renewal and function
Self-renewal, proliferation, and tumorigenesis of GSCs
Radioresistance and invasiveness of GSCs
BCSC phenotypes and breast cancer metastasis
[75, 76, 84, 85, 91]
m6A FTO GSC growth, self-renewal, and tumor progression [83, 86]
m6A IGF2BP2 CRC stemness and metastasis [78]
IGF2BP1 Self-renewal and stemness maintenance of BCSCs [92]
U-tail DIS3L2 CSC properties [102]

m6A is the most prevalent posttranscriptional modification of mRNA and is involved in mRNA stability, splicing, translation, and other biological processes [34]. Huang et al. demonstrated that m6A mRNA modifications are enriched near the peaks of histone H3 trimethylation at Lys36 (H3K36me3), which is a histone marker, and are reduced when H3K36me3 is depleted in mouse ESCs [35]. METTL14, a major component of the m6A methyltransferase complex, can recognize and bind to H3K36me3 and then promote the cotranscriptional deposition of m6A. In mouse ESCs, METTL14 knockdown and H3K36me3 loss significantly reduced m6A levels in transcriptome-wide and pluripotency transcripts, leading to increased cell stemness. H3K36me3 inhibits pluripotency and promotes the differentiation of mouse ESCs partially by regulating the m6A modifications of several key pluripotency genes, such as octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4), sex-determining region Y- (SRY-) box 2 (SOX2), and NANOG [35] (Figure 1). These results indicated that m6A RNA methylation and histone modification interact in the regulation of ESC pluripotency and differentiation. In addition, m6A was identified as a regulator for terminating naive pluripotency in mice to ensure timely pluripotent factor downregulation, which is necessary for proper lineage initiation and differentiation [36]. Loss of METTL3 in preimplantation epiblasts and naive ESCs leads to near complete depletion of m6A on mRNA. However, METTL3−/− ESCs still retain their naive pluripotency. Abnormal and restricted lineage initiation subsequently occurs in the postimplantation phase and results in early embryonic lethality [36]. These results are the foundation for studying the role of m6A in other stem cell developmental transitions and exploring other potential m6A functions. Sun et al. reported that extracellular regulated protein kinases- (ERK-) dependent phosphorylation of METTL3 and WTAP promotes ESC differentiation [37]. Lack of METTL3/WTAP phosphorylation reduces decay of m6A-labeled pluripotent factor transcripts and traps mouse ESCs in the pluripotent state [37] (Figure 1). Another m6A methyltransferase METTL5 has recently been shown to be important for ESC pluripotency and differentiation. Ignatova et al. reported that the absence of METTL5 in mouse ESCs results in a decrease in global translation rate, spontaneous loss of pluripotency, and compromised differentiation potential [12]. Xing et al. also found that deletion of METTL5 causes a dramatic differentiation defect in mouse ESCs [38]. ZC3H13, a zinc finger protein, plays a vital role in regulating RNA m6A methylation in ESC nuclei. ZC3H13 works together with the WTAP–VIRILIZER–HAKAI complex to promote mRNA m6A processing [39]. ZC3H13 is necessary for the nuclear localization of WTAP, VIRILIZER, and HAKAI. ZC3H13 knockout in mouse ESCs remarkably reduced m6A levels, damaged self-renewal, and triggered differentiation [39]. The above studies suggested that these m6A methyltransferases play an important role in ESC differentiation and pluripotency through different regulatory mechanisms.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

m6A RNA methylation interacts with H3K36me3, ERK, GSK-3, and Activin/Nodal signaling pathway to regulate ESC self-renewal, differentiation, cell stemness, and pluripotency.

The RNA demethylase FTO is typically phosphorylated by glycogen synthase kinase- (GSK-) 3 and leads to polyubiquitination, which is impaired in GSK-3-knockout ESCs, resulting in increased FTO protein levels [40] (Figure 1). The m6A levels of pluripotency-related mRNAs Esrrb and c-Myc decreased because of the alteration of FTO protein levels [40]. The study indicated that FTO and GSK-3 interactions are involved in the regulation of stem cell pluripotency.

The YTHDF proteins have recently been proposed to perform different cellular functions. Wang et al. reported that depletion of YTHDF3 in ESCs resulted in the loss of pluripotency with accelerated expressions of marker genes involved in the formation of three germ layers [41]. Liu et al. showed that knockout of METTL3 or YTHDC1 in mouse ESCs increases chromatin accessibility and activates transcription in an m6A-dependent manner [42]. Lasman et al. systematically knocked out (KO) each of the YTHDF1/2/3 readers and the three readers together (triple-KO) to analyze the effect in vitro in mouse ESCs and found that only triple-KO ESCs are not able to differentiate properly and present a prolonged mRNA half-life while no significant effect is seen in the single-KOs [43]. This suggested that there is compensation between the three YTHDF reader proteins in mouse ESCs.

Similar to the role of m6A mRNA modification on the fate of ESCs, m6A on lncRNA also affects ESC pluripotency and differentiation. Yang et al. reported that linc1281 deletion affects the differentiation of mouse ESCs, but linc1281 was not necessary for the self-renewal of mouse ESCs [44]. The m6A modification is significantly enriched in linc1281 transcripts. linc1281 containing the RRACU m6A sequence motifs could restore the differentiation capacity in linc1281-deficient mouse ESCs [44]. Mechanistically, linc1281 regulates mouse ESC pluripotency and differentiation by sequestering relevant let-7 miRNAs, which depend on m6A [44].

4. m6A and Adult Stem Cells

Many studies have reported the crucial biological functions of m6A modification in different ASCs. Here, we summarize the research results of m6A modification in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), neural stem cells (NSCs), and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) (Table 1).

4.1. m6A and HSCs

HSCs are derived from ESCs and have high self-renewal and multiple differentiation capabilities [45]. HSCs develop into mature blood cells according to certain rules under the influence of various regulatory factors in the hematopoietic microenvironment [45]. The m6A modification plays a key role in hematopoietic development during vertebrate embryogenesis [46].

METTL3 is a key component of the m6A methyltransferase complex. METTL3 deletion promotes cell differentiation and reduces cell proliferation in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) [47]. By contrast, wild-type METTL3 overexpression inhibits cell differentiation and promotes cell growth in vitro [47]. Notably, Lee et al. reported opposite results: the conditional deletion of METTL3 in the adult hematopoietic system resulted in HSC accumulation in bone marrow, and the blockade of HSC differentiation led to a significant reduction of reconstitution potential both in vivo and in vitro [48]. However, the number and function of myeloid cells were not affected by METTL3 deletion. The authors identified m6A targets in HSCs through RNA sequencing and found notable enrichment of 2073 genes related to hematopoietic differentiation, and the m6A modification of these genes was dependent on METTL3 [48]. In addition, MYC was identified as a major functional target of m6A in HSCs. Further validating the difference between the two studies warrants further research, and the role of m6A in HSCs and progenitor cells may require individual identification. Cheng et al. uncovered that m6A is essential for the maintenance of HSC identity and symmetric commitment, with normal asymmetric commitment upon METTL3 depletion [49]. Gao et al. showed that loss of METTL3 resulted in defective fetal hematopoietic progenitor proliferation, lineage commitment, and maturation, with accumulation of immature HSPCs and resultant hematopoietic failure [50]. Zhang et al. also revealed the crucial role of m6A modification in the fate of HSPCs during vertebrate embryogenesis. The authors found that m6A peaks are obviously enriched in RRACH motifs in zebrafish, and this result is consistent with studies in mammals [51]. In METTL3-deficient embryos, delayed YTHDF2-mediated mRNA decay of the arterial endothelial genes notch1a and rhoca resulted in a significant decrease of m6A levels and blockade of HSPCs [51] (Figure 2). Because the continual activation of Notch signaling in arterial endothelial cells of METTL3-deficient embryos blocked the endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition, the production of the earliest HSPCs was inhibited [51]. These findings indicated that METTL3 may be a central regulator of HSPC fate.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

m6A RNA methylation interacts with multiple signaling pathways to regulate the proliferation and differentiation of different ASCs.

Li et al. confirmed the role of m6A reader protein YTHDF2 in the maintenance of ASCs [52]. The authors demonstrated that YTHDF2 plays a crucial role in regulating the expansion of HSCs in vivo by modulating the stability of various mRNAs essential for HSC self-renewal [52].

METTL14, another major m6A methyltransferase, is highly expressed in normal HSPCs and reduced during myeloid differentiation. Inhibition of METTL14 promotes terminal myeloid differentiation of normal HSPCs [53].

Collectively, these results clarify the profound effects of m6A in the process of hematopoiesis. METTL3, METTL14, and YTHDF2 may serve as key targets for m6A to regulate HSC self-renewal and differentiation in clinical research.

4.2. m6A and NSCs

m6A is critical in regulating neuronal development and adult neurogenesis [54]. Loss of METTL3 considerably reduces m6A levels in adult NSCs (aNSCs) and inhibited the proliferation of aNSCs without affecting their homogeneity [55]. METTL3 deficiency not only inhibits the development of neurons but also makes the differentiation of aNSCs more inclined toward glial lineage; the morphological maturation of new neurons in the adult brain is also affected [55]. METTL3-mediated m6A modification regulates histone methyltransferase Ezh2 expression at the translational level. Ezh2 overexpression could alter neuronal development and neurogenesis defects caused by METTL3 deficiency [55]. In addition, METTL3 may contribute to spinal cord regeneration. Xing et al. showed a conserved feature of METTL3 changes in a mouse spinal cord injury model, in which the expression of METTL3 is increased in NSCs [56]. Another m6A methyltransferase METTL14 is required for NSC proliferation and maintains NSCs in an undifferentiated state. METTL14 knockout decreases NSC proliferation and promotes premature NSC differentiation, which suggests that m6A is necessary for NSC self-renewal [57].

Similarly, m6A demethylase FTO is key in neurodevelopment and neurogenesis. FTO is strongly expressed in neurons and aNSCs and dynamically expressed during postnatal neurodevelopment [58]. FTO deletion results in reduced brain size and body weight. The lack of FTO can inhibit the proliferation and neuronal differentiation of aNSCs in vivo, leading to learning and memory impairment in mice [58]. Cao et al. showed that FTO deficiency in aNSCs transiently increases the proliferation of aNSCs and promotes neuronal differentiation, but in a long term, FTO deficiency inhibits adult neurogenesis and neuronal development through modulating the Pdgfra/Socs5-Stat3 pathway [59] (Figure 2).

The deletion of the m6A reader protein YTHDF2 in the embryonic neocortex seriously affects the self-renewal of neural stem and progenitor cells (NSPCs) and the spatiotemporal generation of neurons and other cell types [60]. NSPC proliferation and differentiation ability were significantly reduced in YTHDF2−/− embryos in both in vivo and in vitro experiments [60]. YTHDF2−/− neurons cannot produce normal functional neurites, and expression of genes rich in neural development pathways is remarkably interfered [60]. Increased levels of m6A modified transcripts are caused by delayed degradation of mRNAs in YTHDF2−/− NSPCs, which may result in neurogenesis defects [60].

Taken together, the writers, erasers, and readers of m6A modification all participate in the development of the nervous system and have crucial effects on neurogenesis.

4.3. m6A and BMSCs

BMSCs have multidirectional differentiation potential, can support hematopoiesis, promote HSC implantation, participate in key biological processes such as tissue regeneration and immune privilege, and have broad application prospects in stem cell therapy and regenerative medicine [61]. The m6A modification is involved in the development and differentiation of BMSCs. The expression of m6A methyltransferase METTL3 is significantly upregulated in the adipogenic process of porcine BMSCs (pBMSCs) [62]. A lack of METTL3 in pBMSCs can promote adipose formation and mediate Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) expression in an m6A–YTHDF2-dependent manner [62]. METTL3 deficiency reduces the m6A levels of JAK1, thus enhancing the stability of YTHDF2-dependent JAK1 mRNA. JAK1 affects adipogenesis by regulating STAT5 expression and activity. STAT5 can directly bind to the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) β promoter to regulate its activity and mediate JAK1-regulated adipogenic gene expression and thus affect adipogenesis [62] (Figure 2). This study provides a new perspective for the potential molecular mechanism of m6A modification in regulating BMSC differentiation into adipocytes and may provide crucial reference values in stem cell regenerative medicine and obesity treatment.

Moreover, METTL3 deficiency in BMSCs may lead to bone impairment, insufficient osteogenic differentiation ability, and increased adipogenic potential. Yu identified METTL3 as a crucial regulator in the progression of osteogenic differentiation [63]. METTL3 is highly expressed in osteogenically differentiated BMSCs [64]. Loss of METTL3 suppressed the osteogenic differentiation potential of BMSCs [64]. Yan et al. reported that METTL3-induced m6A methylation of RNAs promotes osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs through m6A-based posttranscriptional regulation of runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) [65]. Silence of METTL3 by short interfering RNA (siRNA) decreased m6A methylation levels and inhibited osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs and reduced bone mass [65]. In addition, METTL3 overexpression in BMSCs can prevent osteoporosis caused by estrogen deficiency in mice [66]. In terms of mechanisms, the parathyroid hormone (PTH)/parathyroid hormone receptor-1 (PTH1R) signal axis is a pivotal m6A downstream pathway in BMSCs [66]. METTL3 conditional knockout reduces the translation efficiency of PTH1R in BMSCs and interferes with PTH-induced osteogenic and adipogenic effects in vivo [66] (Figure 2). These results provide new insights into the key regulatory role of m6A in bone health and disease as well as new evidence for the regulation of stem cell differentiation by m6A.

The demethylase activity of FTO is required for MSC differentiation. Wang et al. demonstrated that exposure of MSCs to TNF-α is sufficient to repress FTO expression, leading to increased Nanog mRNA methylation, decreased Nanog mRNA expression, and reduced differentiation potential of MSCs [67].

5. m6A and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

iPSCs were originally obtained by using viral vectors to transfer four transcription factors, OCT4, SOX2, Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), and c-Myc, into differentiated somatic cells and reprogramming them. iPSCs have broad application prospects in the treatment of human diseases and organ transplantation [68]. Because of their similarity to and physiological characteristics in the human genome, porcine iPSCs (piPSCs) have become an ideal alternative research model to human ESCs (hESCs). The m6A modification plays a major role in mediating the pluripotency of piPSCs. METTL3 deletion remarkably affects cell self-renewal and pluripotency in piPSCs. METTL3 controls the STAT3–KLF4–SOX2 signal pathway by mediating JAK2 and SOSC3 expression in a YTHDF1/YTHDF2-orchestrated manner to regulate piPSC pluripotency [69] (Figure 3, Table 1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The schematic of interplays between Activin/Nodal and STAT3-KLF4-SOX2 signaling pathway with m6A modulators in regulation of iPSC pluripotency.

Bertero et al. reported that the intracellular effectors SMAD2 and SMAD3 (SMAD2/3) interact with the METTL3–METTL14–WTAP complex in an Activin/Nodal signal-dependent manner in both hESCs and human iPSCs (hiPSCs) [70] (Figures 1 and 3, Table 1). The interaction could promote m6A deposition on transcript subsets participating in early cell fate determination. The resulting negative feedback makes these transcripts unstable and leads to rapid degradation after inhibiting the Activin/Nodal signal [70]. The mechanism facilitates timely withdrawal of pluripotency and induces neuroectodermal differentiation.

The m6A reader proteins YTHDF2 and YTHDF3 are required for reprogramming somatic cells into iPSCs [71]. YTHDF2 is highly expressed in iPSCs and downregulated during neural differentiation [72]. Depletion of YTHDF2 in iPSCs leads to stabilization of a group of m6A-modified transcripts associated with neural development, loss of pluripotency, and induction of neural-specific gene expression [72] (Table 1).

6. m6A and CSCs

CSCs are a small subset of various tumor types that have the dual characteristics of self-renewal and differentiation and are crucial in tumor occurrence and development. CSCs are resistant to most treatments and are therefore related to cancer recurrence [73]. Therefore, developing a more effective treatment necessitates further exploration of the molecular mechanism of CSC regulation.

6.1. m6A and LSCs

Compared with healthy HSPCs or other types of cancer cells, m6A methyltransferase METTL3 is more abundant in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells. In addition, METTL3 loss in human myeloid leukemia cell lines can lead to cell differentiation and apoptosis and hinder the progress of leukemia in recipient mice in vivo. m6A can promote the translation of c-Myc, Bcl-2, and PTEN mRNAs in the human AML MOLM-13 cell line [47]. Barbieri et al. also demonstrated that METTL3 is a crucial gene for AML cell growth [74]. In immunodeficient mice, downregulation of METTL3 leads to cell-cycle arrest, leukemia cell differentiation, and leukemia establishment failure. METTL3 is related to chromatin and is located at the transcriptional initiation sites of active genes. Moreover, most of these genes have the CAATT-box binding protein CEBPZ at the transcription initiation site, which is necessary for METTL3 to be recruited into chromatin [74]. Promoter-bound METTL3 induces m6A modification in the coding region of relevant mRNA transcripts and improves its translation efficiency by mitigating ribosome stagnation [74]. These results suggest that METTL3 may be a potential target for myeloid malignancy treatment.

METTL14, another m6A methyltransferase, is strongly expressed in AML cells carrying t(11q23), t(15;17), or t(8;21) and is reduced during myeloid differentiation [53]. METTL14 inhibition promotes terminal myeloid differentiation of AML cells and inhibits AML cell survival and proliferation. METTL14 is essential for the development and maintenance of AML and self-renewal of leukemia stem initiation cells (LSCs or LICs) [53]. METTL14 plays a carcinogenic role by regulating its key targets, such as MYB and MYC, through m6A modification.

The demethylase ALKBH5 plays critical roles in leukemic cell transformation, AML development and maintenance, and LSC/LIC self-renewal through posttranscriptional regulation of critical targets via m6A-dependent mechanisms [75]. Shen et al. demonstrated that targeting ALKBH5 effectively inhibits AML development/maintenance and suppresses LSC self-renewal while sparing normal hematopoiesis [75]. Wang et al. showed that ALKBH5 is required for maintaining LSC function but is dispensable for normal hematopoiesis and reveal KDM4C-ALKBH5-AXL signaling axis in AML development and maintenance [76] (Figure 4). These findings suggest a potential therapeutic strategy for selectively treating AML by targeting ALKBH5.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The schematic of interplays between m6A modulators and multiple factors in regulation of different CSC phenotypes, tumorigenicity, and metastasis.

The m6A reader protein YTHDF2 has been shown to be overexpressed in a broad spectrum of human AML [77]. YTHDF2 is essential for disease initiation and reproduction in mouse and human AML. YTHDF2 can reduce the half-life of m6A transcripts, which are crucial for the overall integrity of LSC function [77]. Notably, the authors found that YTHDF2 is not required for normal HSC function and that YTHDF2 deletion may increase HSC activity [77].

6.2. m6A and CRC CSCs

One study revealed the basic functions of m6A in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and demonstrated the carcinogenic effects of METTL3 in promoting stemness and metastasis of CRC. Colorectal cancer stem-like cells are a cancer cell type with self-renewal and multiple differentiation potential and have strong tumorigenicity and metastasis abilities. METTL3 inhibition could enhance chemotherapy response and reduce CSCs in CRC [78]. METTL3 maintains the expression of the CSC marker SRY-box 2 (SOX2) through the m6A–IGF2BP2-dependent regulatory mechanism in CRC cells and then promotes CRC stemness and metastasis [78] (Figure 4). In addition, METTL3 inhibition could reduce the surface antigen expression of colorectal CSCs. Overall, these results highlight the critical role of METTL3 in CRC, indicating that METTL3 may be a CSC marker for CRC diagnosis and treatment.

The m6A reader protein YTHDF1 is involved in tumorigenesis. YTHDF1 knockdown considerably inhibited the tumorigenicity of CRC cells in vitro and the growth of mouse xenograft tumors in vivo [79]. YTHDF1 silencing reduced the number of colonospheres, downregulated CRC CSC marker expression, and inhibited Wnt/β-catenin pathway activity by interacting with FZD9 and Wnt6 mRNA in CRC cells [79] (Figure 4). These results indicate that YTHDF1 is key in tumorigenicity and stem cell-like activity in CRC cells and may provide a new potential target for the clinical treatment of CRC.

6.3. m6A and GSCs

The m6A mRNA modification plays a key role in glioblastoma stem cell (GSC) self-renewal and tumorigenesis. Visvanathan et al. reported that METTL3-mediated m6A modification plays a key role in GSC maintenance and glioma cell dedifferentiation [80]. METTL3 expression is elevated in GSC and attenuated during differentiation. The METTL3-dependent GSC maintenance is mediated by SOX2 mRNA stabilization, and human antigen R (HuR) recruitment to m6A-modified sites is required for SOX2 mRNA stabilization [80] (Figure 4). METTL3-silenced GSCs exhibited increased sensitivity to γ-irradiation and decreased DNA repair. Exogenous overexpression of 3′UTR-less SOX2 exhibited potent DNA repair in METTL3-silenced GSCs [80]. In addition, METTL3 is essential for the expression of GSC-specific actively transcribed genes [81]. The integrated analysis of the m6A regulome in METTL3-silenced GSCs showed global disruption in tumorigenic pathways that are indispensable for GSC maintenance and glioma progression [81]. Li et al. identified METTL3 as a modulator of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay to sustain malignancy in glioblastoma (GBM) [82]. Silencing METTL3 or overexpressing dominant-negative mutant METTL3 suppressed the growth and self-renewal of GSCs [82]. These data suggest that METTL3 may be a molecular target for clinical GBM treatment. Moreover, METTL3 or METTL14 deletion can significantly enhance GSC growth, self-renewal, and tumor progression [83]. By contrast, METTL3 overexpression or FTO suppression can inhibit GSC growth and self-renewal. In addition, FTO inhibition can suppress tumor progression and prolong the lifespan of GSC-transplanted mice [83]. Further analysis demonstrated that m6A modification participates in regulating the expression of genes with crucial biological functions in GSCs, which may be a target for GBM treatment.

The levels of m6A demethylase ALKBH5 are high in GSCs. ALKBH5 is necessary for GSC self-renewal, and increased ALKBH5 expression typically indicates a poor prognosis in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), whereas ALKBH5 deletion can inhibit GSC proliferation and tumorigenesis [84]. Kowalski-Chauvel et al. demonstrated that targeting ALKBH5 increases radiosensitization of GSCs by controlling the homologous repair and represses their invasion capability [85]. These data suggested that ALKBH5 is an attractive therapeutic target to overcome radioresistance and invasiveness of GSCs. Huff et al. showed that FTO inhibitor FTO-04 can impair the self-renewal properties of GSCs to prevent neurosphere formation without significantly altering the growth of human NSC neurospheres [86].

Yarmishyn et al. demonstrated that YTHDF1 is involved in Musashi-1-mediated GBM tumorigenesis processes such as cell proliferation and migration and also regulates the stem-like properties of GBM cells [87]. YTHDF2 was identified as a GSC-specific dependency that regulates glucose metabolism in GSCs through stabilization of MYC transcripts [88].

6.4. m6A and BCSCs

The breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) are the crucial factors for the occurrence, growth, metastasis, and recurrence of breast cancer [89]. BCSC phenotype is specified and maintained by the expression of octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4), Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), SRY-box 2 (SOX2), and NANOG [90]. Hypoxia can promote BCSC enrichment in breast cancer cells, which depends on the activity of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) [90]. Knockout of ZNF217 or ALKBH5 gene can increase m6A RNA methylation and decrease the levels of NANOG and KLF4 under hypoxic conditions [91]. The expressions of hypoxia-induced pluripotent factors and ALKBH5 or ZNF217 in breast cancer cell lines are dependent on HIF. The expression of HIF-1α and ALKBH5 were consistent in human breast cancer biopsies analyzed. Knockout of ALKBH5 in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells remarkably reduced breast-to-lung metastasis in immunodeficient mice [91] (Figure 4). This study suggests that m6A demethylase ALKBH5 and m6A methyltransferase inhibitor ZNF217 have important effects on BCSC phenotype and breast cancer metastasis. Zhu et al. reported that hypoxia-induced lncRNA KB-1980E6.3 is involved in the self-renewal and stemness maintenance of BCSCs by recruiting IGF2BP1 to regulate c-Myc mRNA stability. The lncRNA KB-1980E6.3/IGF2BP1/c-Myc axis may potentially be a therapeutic target for breast cancer [92] (Figure 4).

Overall, these results indicate that m6A modification has an important influence on the occurrence and development of various cancers and may be a potential target for cancer treatment (Table 1).

7. m5C and Stem Cells

m5C is another crucial posttranscriptional RNA modification. However, studies related to this modification and stem cell biology are limited.

An unbiased global analysis of total RNA and nuclear poly(A) RNA m5C in mouse ESCs and mouse brains indicated that m5C loci accumulated considerably near the codon of translation initiation, depleted from the m6A peak region of the translation stop codon, and increased at different locations in 3′UTRs in different transcript classes [93]. This study provides a comprehensive map of cytosine methylation in the transcriptome of murine pluripotent and differentiation stages and provides crucial reference values for future studies of the biological function of m5C in mammalian RNA. The RNA m5C methyltransferase NSUN3 regulates ESC differentiation by affecting mitochondrial activity. NSUN3 mutant cells exhibited significant reductions in mt-tRNAMet methylation and formylation as well as mitochondrial translation and respiration [94]. Although the proliferation of NSUN3 mutant cells decreased, pluripotency marker gene expression was not affected [94]. ESC differentiation had a tendency toward mesoderm and endoderm lineages at the expense of neuroectoderm [94]. Thus, these findings demonstrate that m5C RNA modification plays a crucial role in regulating ESC fate and function (Table 1).

m5C RNA methylation is involved in the regulation of NSC differentiation and motility. The m5C methyltransferase NSUN2 is expressed in neuroepithelial stem and progenitor cells during early human brain development, and its expression gradually decreases during neural differentiation [95]. Deletion of NSUN2-mediated tRNA methylation increases their endonucleolytic cleavage by angiogenin, resulting in the enrichment of 5′-derived tRNA fragments in NSUN2−/− brains [95]. NSUN2 depletion inhibits the migration of neural cells to chemical attractant fibroblast growth factor 2, leading to impaired neural differentiation of neuroepithelial stem cells [95] (Table 1). These findings indicate that m5C RNA methylation has crucial effects on neural development, and its role in other stem cells requires further exploration and research.

8. U-Tail and Stem Cells

U-tail is closely related to stem cell differentiation and cancer (Table 1). Zcchc11 (TUT4) was identified as the 3′ TUTase responsible for Lin28-mediated pre–let-7 U-tail and blockade of let-7 processing in mouse ESCs [96]. Zcchc6 (TUT7) was also identified as an alternative TUTase that functions with Lin28 in vitro [97]. Zcchc11 and Zcchc6 redundantly control let-7 biogenesis in ESCs [97]. These results provide insight into the mechanism of Lin28-mediated TUTase control of let-7 expression in stem cells and cancer. In addition, Takahashi et al. reported that TUT7 is involved in the neural differentiation of primed pluripotent stem cells via the regulation of human endogenous retrovirus accumulation [98].

DIS3L2 is a 3′–5′ exonuclease responsible for the decay of uridylated let-7 precursor in mouse ESCs [99, 100]. Pirouz et al. showed that DIS3L2 is required for normal ESC differentiation [101]. DIS3L2 deficiency resulted in the formation of larger embryoid bodies during spontaneous ESC differentiation [101]. Liu et al. found that an lncRNA (AC105461.1), a promoter upstream transcript of DIS3L2, may be a mediator of CRC stem cells [102]. The expression of AC105461.1 was positively correlated with that of DIS3L2 in CRC [102]. AC105461.1 overexpression impaired the CSC properties while knockdown enhanced the CSC properties, including self-renewal, migration, and invasion abilities [102]. The role of U-tail in various stem cells cannot be ignored, and it is worth more exploration in the future.

9. Conclusions and Perspectives

RNA methylation, as a vital posttranscriptional mechanism of gene regulation, is crucial to physiological and pathological processes. As high-throughput sequencing technology is rapidly developing, the understanding of the biological functions of RNA methylation is deepening.

Numerous studies demonstrated a close correlation between RNA methylation and stem cells. RNA methylation plays a key role in regulating stem cell maintenance, differentiation, reprogramming, and controlling in mammalian developmental stages. The regulatory factors of RNA methylation are involved in regulating stem cell fate and function. These findings have opened new directions for the clinical treatment of various diseases, including cancer. The aberrant expression of one or more RNA methylation regulatory factors may be used as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker. Further in-depth analysis of RNA methylation may aid in developing inhibitors targeting writers, erasers, or readers to further explore the potential mechanisms for controlling gene expression in stem cells in physiology and pathology. However, many obstacles remain that must be overcome when treating diseases by targeting RNA methylation. In addition, although RNA methylation involves many patterns, research on RNA methylation patterns in addition to m6A in stem cells is limited and may require further exploration and research as well as more advanced molecular biology techniques to make breakthroughs.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Jining Municipal Science and Technology Development Project (grant number 2016-56-82) and Scientific Research Support Fund for Young Teachers of Jining Medical University (grant number JY2016KJ022Y).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Haran V., Lenka N. Deciphering the epitranscriptomic signatures in cell fate determination and development. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports . 2019;15(4):474–496. doi: 10.1007/s12015-019-09894-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee M., Kim B., Kim V. N. Emerging roles of RNA modification: m6A and U-tail. Cell . 2014;158(5):980–987. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shyh-Chang N., Ng H. H. The metabolic programming of stem cells. Genes & Development . 2017;31(4):336–346. doi: 10.1101/gad.293167.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dulak J., Szade K., Szade A., Nowak W., Jozkowicz A. Adult stem cells: hopes and hypes of regenerative medicine. Acta Biochimica Polonica . 2015;62(3):329–337. doi: 10.18388/abp.2015_1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morena F., Argentati C., Bazzucchi M., Emiliani C., Martino S. Above the epitranscriptome: RNA modifications and stem cell identity. Genes . 2018;9(7):p. 329. doi: 10.3390/genes9070329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hastings M. H. m6A mRNA methylation: a new circadian pacesetter. Cell . 2013;155(4):740–741. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pan T. _N_ 6-methyl-adenosine modification in messenger and long non-coding RNA. Trends in Biochemical Sciences . 2013;38(4):204–209. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen T., Hao Y. J., Zhang Y., et al. m6A RNA methylation is regulated by microRNAs and promotes reprogramming to pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell . 2015;16(3):289–301. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Natalia P., Stephanie S., Justin J.-L. W. Aberrant expression of enzymes regulating m6A mRNA methylation: implication in cancer. Cancer Biology & Medicine . 2018;15(4):323–334. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Knuckles P., Buhler M. Adenosine methylation as a molecular imprint defining the fate of RNA. FEBS Letters . 2018;592(17):2845–2859. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vissers C., Sinha A., Song H. The epitranscriptome in stem cell biology and neural development. Neurobiology of Disease . 2020;146, article 105139 doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ignatova V. V., Stolz P., Kaiser S., et al. The rRNA m6A methyltransferase METTL5 is involved in pluripotency and developmental programs. Genes & Development . 2020;34(9-10):715–729. doi: 10.1101/gad.333369.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang S., Sun C., Li J., et al. Roles of RNA methylation by means of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in human cancers. Cancer Letters . 2017;408:112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dai D., Wang H., Zhu L., Jin H., Wang X. N6-methyladenosine links RNA metabolism to cancer progression. Cell Death & Disease . 2018;9(2):p. 124. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0129-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang H., Weng H., Sun W., et al. Recognition of RNA _N_ 6-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nature Cell Biology . 2018;20(3):285–295. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0045-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen B., Li Y., Song R., Xue C., Xu F. Functions of RNA N6-methyladenosine modification in cancer progression. Molecular Biology Reports . 2019;46(1):1383–1391. doi: 10.1007/s11033-018-4471-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen J., Wang C., Fei W., Fang X., Hu X. Epitranscriptomic m6A modification in the stem cell field and its effects on cell death and survival. American Journal of Cancer Research . 2019;9(4):752–764. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Edelheit S., Schwartz S., Mumbach M. R., Wurtzel O., Sorek R. Transcriptome-wide mapping of 5-methylcytidine RNA modifications in bacteria, archaea, and yeast reveals m5C within archaeal mRNAs. PLoS Genetics . 2013;9(6, article e1003602) doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Trixl L., Lusser A. The dynamic RNA modification 5-methylcytosine and its emerging role as an epitranscriptomic mark. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews RNA . 2019;10(1, article e1510) doi: 10.1002/wrna.1510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cui X., Liang Z., Shen L., et al. 5-Methylcytosine RNA methylation in _Arabidopsis thaliana_. Molecular Plant . 2017;10(11):1387–1399. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Squires J. E., Patel H. R., Nousch M., et al. Widespread occurrence of 5-methylcytosine in human coding and non-coding RNA. Nucleic Acids Research . 2012;40(11):5023–5033. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sun Z., Xue S., Xu H., et al. Effects of NSUN2 deficiency on the mRNA 5-methylcytosine modification and gene expression profile in HEK293 cells. Epigenomics . 2019;11(4):439–453. doi: 10.2217/epi-2018-0169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dominissini D., Rechavi G. 5-Methylcytosine mediates nuclear export of mRNA. Cell Research . 2017;27(6):717–719. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li Q., Li X., Tang H., et al. NSUN2-mediated m5C methylation and METTL3/METTL14-mediated m6A methylation cooperatively enhance p21 translation. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry . 2017;118(9):2587–2598. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bohnsack K., Höbartner C., Bohnsack M. Eukaryotic 5-methylcytosine (m5C) RNA methyltransferases: mechanisms, cellular functions, and links to disease. Genes . 2019;10(2):p. 102. doi: 10.3390/genes10020102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.David R., Burgess A., Parker B., et al. Transcriptome-wide mapping of RNA 5-methylcytosine in Arabidopsis mRNAs and noncoding RNAs. The Plant Cell . 2017;29(3):445–460. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shen L., Song C.-X., He C., Zhang Y. Mechanism and function of oxidative reversal of DNA and RNA methylation. Annual Review of Biochemistry . 2014;83(1):585–614. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang X., Yang Y., Sun B.-F., et al. 5-methylcytosine promotes mRNA export -- NSUN2 as the methyltransferase and ALYREF as an m5C reader. Cell Research . 2017;27(5):606–625. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yang Y., Wang L., Han X., et al. RNA 5-methylcytosine facilitates the maternal-to-zygotic transition by preventing maternal mRNA decay. Molecular Cell . 2019;75(6):1188–202.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yeo J., Kim V. N. U-tail as a guardian against invading RNAs. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology . 2018;25(10):903–905. doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0139-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim B., Ha M., Loeff L., et al. TUT7 controls the fate of precursor microRNAs by using three different uridylation mechanisms. The EMBO Journal . 2015;34(13):1801–1815. doi: 10.15252/embj.201590931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lim J., Ha M., Chang H., et al. Uridylation by TUT4 and TUT7 marks mRNA for degradation. Cell . 2014;159(6):1365–1376. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chang H., Yeo J., Kim J.-G., et al. Terminal uridylyltransferases execute programmed clearance of maternal transcriptome in vertebrate embryos. Molecular Cell . 2018;70(1):72–82.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hong K. Emerging function of N6-methyladenosine in cancer (review) Oncology Letters . 2018;16(5):5519–5524. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Huang H., Weng H., Zhou K., et al. Histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 36 guides m6A RNA modification co-transcriptionally. Nature . 2019;567(7748):414–419. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1016-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Geula S., Moshitch-Moshkovitz S., Dominissini D., et al. m6A mRNA methylation facilitates resolution of naïve pluripotency toward differentiation. Science . 2015;347(6225):1002–1006. doi: 10.1126/science.1261417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sun H.-L., Zhu A. C., Gao Y., et al. Stabilization of ERK-phosphorylated METTL3 by USP5 increases m6A methylation. Molecular Cell . 2020;80(4):633–647.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xing M., Liu Q., Mao C., et al. The 18SrRNAm6A methyltransferaseMETTL5 promotes mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation. EMBO Reports . 2020;21(10) doi: 10.15252/embr.201949863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wen J., Lv R., Ma H., et al. Zc3h13 regulates nuclear RNA m6A methylation and mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Molecular Cell . 2018;69(6):1028–1038.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Faulds K. J., Egelston J. N., Sedivy L. J., et al. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) activity regulates mRNA methylation in mouse embryonic stem cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2018;293(27):10731–10743. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang S., Zhang J., Wu X., Lin X., Liu X.-M., Zhou J. Differential roles of YTHDF1 and YTHDF3 in embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte differentiation. RNA Biology . 2021;18(9):1354–1363. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2020.1850628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu J., Dou X., Chen C., et al. N6-methyladenosine of chromosome-associated regulatory RNA regulates chromatin state and transcription. Science . 2020;367(6477):580–586. doi: 10.1126/science.aay6018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lasman L., Krupalnik V., Viukov S., et al. Context-dependent functional compensation between Ythdf m<sup>6</sup>A reader proteins. Genes & Development . 2020;34(19-20):1373–1391. doi: 10.1101/gad.340695.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yang D., Qiao J., Wang G., et al. N6-Methyladenosine modification of lincRNA 1281 is critically required for mESC differentiation potential. Nucleic Acids Research . 2018;46(8):3906–3920. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kasper D. M., Nicoli S. Epigenetic and epitranscriptomic factors make a mark on hematopoietic stem cell development. Current Stem Cell Reports . 2018;4(1):22–32. doi: 10.1007/s40778-018-0113-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vu L. P., Cheng Y., Kharas M. G. The biology of m6A RNA methylation in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Cancer Discovery . 2019;9(1):25–33. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vu L. P., Pickering B. F., Cheng Y., et al. The N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-forming enzyme METTL3 controls myeloid differentiation of normal hematopoietic and leukemia cells. Nature Medicine . 2017;23(11):1369–1376. doi: 10.1038/nm.4416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lee H., Bao S., Qian Y., et al. Stage-specific requirement for Mettl3 -dependent m6A mRNA methylation during haematopoietic stem cell differentiation. Nature Cell Biology . 2019;21(6):700–709. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0318-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cheng Y., Luo H., Izzo F., et al. m6A RNA methylation maintains hematopoietic stem cell identity and symmetric commitment. Cell Reports . 2019;28(7):1703–1716.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gao Y., Vasic R., Song Y., et al. m6A modification prevents formation of endogenous double-stranded RNAs and deleterious innate immune responses during hematopoietic development. Immunity . 2020;52(6):1007–1021.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhang C., Chen Y., Sun B., et al. m6A modulates haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell specification. Nature . 2017;549(7671):273–276. doi: 10.1038/nature23883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Li Z., Qian P., Shao W., et al. Suppression of m6A reader Ythdf2 promotes hematopoietic stem cell expansion. Cell Research . 2018;28(9):904–917. doi: 10.1038/s41422-018-0072-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Weng H., Huang H., Wu H., et al. METTL14 Inhibits Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Differentiation and Promotes Leukemogenesis via mRNA m6A Modification. Cell Stem Cell . 2018;22(2):191–205.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yoon K. J., Ringeling F. R., Vissers C., et al. Temporal Control of Mammalian Cortical Neurogenesis by m6A Methylation. Cell . 2017;171(4):877–89.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chen J., Zhang Y. C., Huang C., et al. m6A regulates neurogenesis and neuronal development by modulating histone methyltransferase Ezh2. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics . 2019;17(2):154–168. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2018.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Xing L., Cai Y., Yang T., et al. Epitranscriptomic m6A regulation following spinal cord injury. Journal of Neuroscience Research . 2021;99(3):843–857. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang Y., Li Y., Yue M., et al. N 6-Methyladenosine RNA modification regulates embryonic neural stem cell self-renewal through histone modifications. Nature Neuroscience . 2018;21(2):195–206. doi: 10.1038/s41593-017-0057-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li L., Zang L., Zhang F., et al. Fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) protein regulates adult neurogenesis. Human Molecular Genetics . 2017;26(13):2398–2411. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cao Y., Zhuang Y., Chen J., et al. Dynamic effects of Fto in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of adult neural stem cells of mice. Human Molecular Genetics . 2020;29(5):727–735. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Li M., Zhao X., Wang W., et al. Ythdf2-mediated m6A mRNA clearance modulates neural development in mice. Genome Biology . 2018;19(1):p. 69. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1436-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Onodera Y., Teramura T., Takehara T., Fukuda K. Transforming Growth Factor β-Activated kinase 1 regulates mesenchymal stem cell proliferation through stabilization of Yap1/Taz proteins. Stem Cells . 2019;37(12):1595–1605. doi: 10.1002/stem.3083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yao Y., Bi Z., Wu R., et al. METTL3 inhibits BMSC adipogenic differentiation by targeting the JAK1/STAT5/C/EBPβ pathway via an m6A-YTHDF2–dependent manner. FASEB Journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology . 2019;33(6):7529–7544. doi: 10.1096/fj.201802644R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yu J., Shen L., Liu Y., et al. The m6A methyltransferase METTL3 cooperates with demethylase ALKBH5 to regulate osteogenic differentiation through NF-κB signaling. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry . 2020;463(1-2):203–210. doi: 10.1007/s11010-019-03641-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tian C., Huang Y., Li Q., Feng Z., Xu Q. Mettl3 regulates osteogenic differentiation and alternative splicing of Vegfa in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2019;20(3):p. 551. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yan G., Yuan Y., He M., et al. m6A methylation of precursor-miR-320/RUNX2 controls osteogenic potential of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Molecular Therapy-Nucleic Acids . 2020;19:421–436. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wu Y., Xie L., Wang M., et al. Mettl3-mediated m6A RNA methylation regulates the fate of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and osteoporosis. Nature Communications . 2018;9(1):p. 4772. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06898-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wang Y., Wang R., Yao B., et al. TNF-α suppresses sweat gland differentiation of MSCs by reducing FTO-mediated m6A-demethylation of Nanog mRNA. Science China Life Sciences . 2020;63(1):80–91. doi: 10.1007/s11427-019-9826-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bindhya S., Sidhanth C., Shabna A., Krishnapriya S., Garg M., Ganesan T. S. Induced pluripotent stem cells: a new strategy to model human cancer. The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology. . 2019;107:62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2018.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wu R., Liu Y., Zhao Y., et al. m6A methylation controls pluripotency of porcine induced pluripotent stem cells by targeting SOCS3/JAK2/STAT3 pathway in a YTHDF1/YTHDF2-orchestrated manner. Cell Death & Disease . 2019;10(3):p. 171. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1417-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bertero A., Brown S., Madrigal P., et al. The SMAD2/3 interactome reveals that TGFβ controls m6A mRNA methylation in pluripotency. Nature . 2018;555(7695):256–259. doi: 10.1038/nature25784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Liu J., Gao M., Xu S., et al. YTHDF2/3 are required for somatic reprogramming through different RNA deadenylation pathways. Cell Reports . 2020;32(10):p. 108120. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Heck A. M., Russo J., Wilusz J., Nishimura E. O., Wilusz C. J. YTHDF2 destabilizes m6A-modified neural-specific RNAs to restrain differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells. RNA . 2020;26(6):739–755. doi: 10.1261/rna.073502.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Toh T. B., Lim J. J., Chow E. K. Epigenetics in cancer stem cells. Molecular Cancer . 2017;16(1):p. 29. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0596-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Barbieri I., Tzelepis K., Pandolfini L., et al. Promoter-bound METTL3 maintains myeloid leukaemia by m6A-dependent translation control. Nature . 2017;552(7683):126–131. doi: 10.1038/nature24678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Shen C., Sheng Y., Zhu A. C., et al. RNA demethylase ALKBH5 selectively promotes tumorigenesis and cancer stem cell self-renewal in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Stem Cell . 2020;27(1):64–80.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wang J., Li Y., Wang P., et al. Leukemogenic chromatin alterations promote AML leukemia stem cells via a KDM4C-ALKBH5-AXL signaling axis. Cell Stem Cell . 2020;27(1):81–97.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Paris J., Morgan M., Campos J., et al. Targeting the RNA m6A reader YTHDF2 selectively compromises cancer stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Stem Cell . 2019;25(1):137–48.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Li T., Hu P. S., Zuo Z., et al. METTL3 facilitates tumor progression via an m6A-IGF2BP2-dependent mechanism in colorectal carcinoma. Molecular Cancer . 2019;18(1):p. 112. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1038-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bai Y., Yang C., Wu R., et al. YTHDF1 regulates tumorigenicity and cancer stem cell-like activity in human colorectal carcinoma. Frontiers in Oncology . 2019;9:p. 332. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Visvanathan A., Patil V., Arora A., et al. Essential role of METTL3-mediated m6A modification in glioma stem-like cells maintenance and radioresistance. Oncogene . 2018;37(4):522–533. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Visvanathan A., Patil V., Abdulla S., Hoheisel J., Somasundaram K. N6-Methyladenosine landscape of glioma stem-like cells: METTL3 is essential for the expression of actively transcribed genes and sustenance of the oncogenic signaling. Genes . 2019;10(2):p. 141. doi: 10.3390/genes10020141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Li F., Yi Y., Miao Y., et al. N6-Methyladenosine modulates nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in human glioblastoma. Cancer Research . 2019;79(22):5785–5798. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-2868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Cui Q., Shi H., Ye P., et al. m6A RNA methylation regulates the self-renewal and tumorigenesis of glioblastoma stem cells. Cell Reports . 2017;18(11):2622–2634. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zhang S., Zhao B. S., Zhou A., et al. m6A Demethylase ALKBH5 Maintains Tumorigenicity of Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells by Sustaining FOXM1 Expression and Cell Proliferation Program. Cancer Cell . 2017;31(4):591–606.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kowalski-Chauvel A., Lacore M. G., Arnauduc F., et al. The m6A RNA demethylase ALKBH5 promotes radioresistance and invasion capability of glioma stem cells. Cancers . 2021;13(1):p. 40. doi: 10.3390/cancers13010040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Huff S., Tiwari S. K., Gonzalez G. M., Wang Y., Rana T. M. m6A-RNA demethylase FTO inhibitors impair self-renewal in glioblastoma stem cells. ACS Chemical Biology . 2021;16(2):324–333. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.0c00841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Yarmishyn A. A., Yang Y. P., Lu K. H., et al. Musashi-1 promotes cancer stem cell properties of glioblastoma cells via upregulation of YTHDF1. Cancer Cell International . 2020;20(1):p. 597. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01696-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Dixit D., Prager B. C., Gimple R. C., et al. The RNA m6A reader YTHDF2 maintains oncogene expression and is a targetable dependency in glioblastoma stem cells. Cancer Discovery . 2021;11(2):480–499. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Zhang L., Xu L., Zhang F., Vlashi E. Doxycycline inhibits the cancer stem cell phenotype and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer. Cell Cycle . 2017;16(8):737–745. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2016.1241929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zhang C., Samanta D., Lu H., et al. Hypoxia induces the breast cancer stem cell phenotype by HIF-dependent and ALKBH5-mediated m6A-demethylation of NANOG mRNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2016;113(14):E2047–E2056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602883113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zhang C., Zhi W. I., Lu H., et al. Hypoxia-inducible factors regulate pluripotency factor expression by ZNF217- and ALKBH5-mediated modulation of RNA methylation in breast cancer cells. Oncotarget . 2016;7(40):64527–64542. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhu P., He F., Hou Y., et al. A novel hypoxic long noncoding RNA KB-1980E6.3 maintains breast cancer stem cell stemness via interacting with IGF2BP1 to facilitate c-Myc mRNA stability. Oncogene . 2021;40(9):1609–1627. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-01638-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Amort T., Rieder D., Wille A., et al. Distinct 5-methylcytosine profiles in poly(A) RNA from mouse embryonic stem cells and brain. Genome Biology . 2017;18(1):p. 1. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1139-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Trixl L., Amort T., Wille A., et al. RNA cytosine methyltransferase Nsun3 regulates embryonic stem cell differentiation by promoting mitochondrial activity. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS . 2018;75(8):1483–1497. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2700-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Flores J. V., Cordero-Espinoza L., Oeztuerk-Winder F., et al. Cytosine-5 RNA methylation regulates neural stem cell differentiation and motility. Stem Cell Reports . 2017;8(1):112–124. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hagan J. P., Piskounova E., Gregory R. I. Lin28 recruits the TUTase Zcchc11 to inhibit let-7 maturation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology . 2009;16(10):1021–1025. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Thornton J. E., Chang H. M., Piskounova E., Gregory R. I. Lin28-mediated control of let-7 microRNA expression by alternative TUTases Zcchc11 (TUT4) and Zcchc6 (TUT7) RNA . 2012;18(10):1875–1885. doi: 10.1261/rna.034538.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Takahashi K., Jeong D., Wang S., et al. Critical roles of translation initiation and RNA uridylation in endogenous retroviral expression and neural differentiation in pluripotent stem cells. Cell Reports . 2020;31(9):p. 107715. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Chang H.-M., Triboulet R., Thornton J. E., Gregory R. I. A role for the Perlman syndrome exonuclease Dis3l2 in the Lin28-let-7 pathway. Nature . 2013;497(7448):244–248. doi: 10.1038/nature12119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Ustianenko D., Hrossova D., Potesil D., et al. Mammalian DIS3L2 exoribonuclease targets the uridylated precursors of let-7 miRNAs. RNA . 2013;19(12):1632–1638. doi: 10.1261/rna.040055.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Pirouz M., Wang C. H., Liu Q., et al. The Perlman syndrome DIS3L2 exoribonuclease safeguards endoplasmic reticulum-targeted mRNA translation and calcium ion homeostasis. Nature Communications . 2020;11(1):p. 2619. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16418-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Liu W., Yu Q., Ma J., et al. Knockdown of a DIS3L2 promoter upstream long noncoding RNA (AC105461.1) enhances colorectal cancer stem cell properties in vitro by down-regulating DIS3L2. OncoTargets and Therapy . 2017;Volume 10:2367–2376. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S132708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Stem Cells International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES