Abstract
During mammalian preimplantation development, stimulation of zygotic genome activation (ZGA) and transposable elements (TEs) shapes totipotency profiling. A rare mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) subpopulation is capable of transiently entering a state resembling 2-cell stage embryos, with subtypes of TEs expressed and ZGA genes transiently activated. In this study, we found that deletion of H2A.X in mESCs led to a significant upregulation of ZGA genes and misregulated TEs. ChIP-seq analysis indicated a direct association of H2A.X at the Dux locus for silencing the Dux gene and its downstream ZGA genes in mESCs. We also demonstrated that histone variant H2A.X is highly enriched in human cleavage embryos when ZGA genes and TEs are active. Therefore, we propose that H2A.X plays an important role in regulating ZGA genes and TEs to establish totipotency.
Keywords: Dux, Histone variant, H2A.X, Transposable element, Zygotic genome activation
Upon fertilization, chromatin reorganization occurs sequentially during preimplantation development [1]. During this period, gametes undergo epigenetic reprogramming to revert to a totipotent state by initiating zygotic gene activation (ZGA) and stimulation of transposable elements (TEs) [2, 3]. Major ZGA peaks at the 2-cell stage in mice, but occur in the 4–8 cell embryo stage in humans. As one of the most critical developmental events, ZGA is generally characterized by the activation of ZGA genes, such as Zscan4, Dux, and the endogenous retrovirus ERVL. ERVL is a downstream target of Dux and a hallmark of ZGA. Besides ERVL, other TEs, such as LINE and SINE, are also enriched in early embryos, especially subtypes of young TEs. Mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) are isolated from the inner cell mass (ICM) of developing blastocysts and are generally in a primed pluripotent state. The chromatin status of mESCs is similar to that of early embryos, and chromatin structure is more open in mESCs than in somatic cells, making mESCs a good model for studying the regulation of TEs. Interestingly, a rare population of mESCs was also reported to transiently express ZGA transcripts when it sporadically transitions into an early embryonic-like state [4]. Therefore, mESCs were also used to identify ZGA activators and repressors [5].
Histones are fundamental structural components of chromatin in cells. In addition to canonical histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, histone variants and their modifications are also typically involved in the specific regulation of chromatin events by expanding the dynamics of nucleosomes and even driving diverse cell fate decisions [6, 7]. Moreover, some histone variants are species specific [8]. Different histone variants have distinct positioning and dynamics in cells, which are assembled into nucleosomes by different molecular chaperones and interact with various chromatin remodeling complexes, thus replacing canonical histones or substitution among various variants during development and cell differentiation [9]. Structural differences introduced by a core histone variant can impact interactions among histones, leading to the transformation of nucleosome stability and chromatin opening or compaction [10]. H2A.Z is a long-standing H2A variant that is highly conserved among species. Deletion of H2A.Z has been reported to be lethal in Drosophila, Tetrahymena, and mice [11,12,13]. Additionally, H2A.Z has been shown to be involved in transcriptional activation and epigenetic memory [14, 15]. Another H2A variant, macroH2A, is a vertebrate-specific histone variant that contains an N-terminal H2A-like region (65% identity to H2A) and a large C-terminal non-histone region [16]. The macroH2A variant is typically associated with condensed chromatin at the inactive X (Xi) chromosome [17], and has been shown to block reprogramming activity [18, 19], indicating its role in transcriptional repression. H2A.X was one of the earliest reported H2A variants, and its major function is regarded as a DNA damage sensor[20]. In mammals, H2A.X shares sequence similarities of up to 95% of canonical H2A [10] and is highly conserved among species [21]. Notably, H2A.X contains a unique SQ motif at its C-terminus and is invariant in species with regard to its sequence and position relative to its C-terminus [22]. Upon DNA damage or induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), the serine in the SQ motif of H2A.X becomes phosphorylated by DNA-dependent protein kinases (ATR/ATM), forming γH2A.X foci to recruit DNA repair complexes [23, 24]. Recent work has shown that H2A.X regulates CDX2 and its targeted extraembryonic genes, and determines the developmental potential of stem cells, indicating regulatory roles of H2A.X in the cell fate control-related transcriptional network [25]. However, the functions of H2A.X beyond DNA repair remain largely unexplored.
In this study, we aimed to identify the potential functions and deposition of H2A variant H2A.X using stem cell models and human early embryos, and demonstrated that H2A.X regulated TEs and repressed ZGA gene expression through deposition at Dux gene loci for inhibition. Additionally, we showed that H2A.X was abundantly deposited in human cleavage embryos when ZGA genes and TEs were active. Our results support the understanding of the important role that H2A.X plays in modulating the expression of ZGA genes and TEs.
Materials and Methods
RNA-seq dataset analysis
Raw reads were processed with Cutadapt v1.16 to remove adapters and perform quality trimming with default parameters except for quality cutoff and minimum length, both of which were equal to 20. Trimmed reads were mapped to the mouse genome (GENCODE release M23) using STAR with default settings. RSEM was used to calculate the FPKM values, and a pseudo count of one was added to the FPKM value for each gene. The TE transcripts program [26] was used to obtain counts for transposable elements with default parameters. Read counts of gene and TE transcripts were normalized to the total aligned counts. Dot-and-box plots and heatmaps were generated by R. RNA-seq results for processing included H2A.X knockout mESCs (GSE49147) and ERVL-positive/negative mESCs (GSE33923). The ZGA gene list has been previously reported [27]. The RNA-seq dataset of the mESCs transcriptome before and after Dux overexpression was also used [28].
ChIP-seq analysis
Raw reads were processed with Cutadapt v1.8.1, to remove adapters and perform quality trimming. Trimmed reads were mapped to the UCSC mm10 assembly using Bowtie2 with default parameters. An Integrative Genomics Viewer (Broad Institute and the Regents of the University of California, USA) was used for visualization. The reported H2A.X ChIP-seq result in mESCs was from GSE42309.
Collection of early human embryos for immunostaining
Human preimplantation embryos were obtained from the Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Medical College, HUST. A total of 29 frozen-thawed embryos abandoned by the patients were included in this study. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the CEIC (Ethics Committee for Clinical Research) of the Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Medical College, HUST. All people included in the study gave informed consent.
Embryos were fixed and permeabilized with 3.7% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% Triton (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in PBS for 45 min. Embryos were then washed three times in PBS-T (0.05% Tween in PBS), blocked for 30 min, and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, followed by three washes in PBS-T and incubation for 2 h at room temperature (25°C) with secondary antibodies and 20 μg/ml Hoechst. The primary antibodies used included anti-H2A.X (ab11175, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and anti-H2A.Z (ab4174, Abcam), anti-macroH2A (61428, active motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and anti-H2A (D210-3, MBL, Nagoya, Japan). Confocal microscopy was performed using a laser scanning microscope (LSM780, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany) at Tongji Medical College, HUST.
Statistical analysis
The Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction was used to calculate P values.
Results
mESCs were reported to transiently activate ZGA genes to show totipotency and other features of 2-cell embryos, and therefore have been widely used to study epigenetic regulation of ZGA events [4]. mESCs also express young TEs because of their relatively open chromatin structure, and the population of mESCs with activated ZGA genes has higher chromatin accessibility and specific activation of ERVL and other TEs [27]. Therefore, to explore the role of H2A.X in regulating the expression of ZGA genes and TEs, we examined the transcriptome of mESCs (derived from 129sv mice) before and after H2A.X depletion [25]. First, we analyzed the expression of ZGA genes in control and H2A.X knockout mESCs and found that their overall expression was enhanced after H2A.X depletion, and the ZGA gene list we used was also proven to be enriched in a totipotent mESCs population marked by ERVL promoter activity [4] (Fig. 1A). Notably, some representative ZGA genes were significantly upregulated after H2A.X knockout, including Zfp352, Sp110, Tcstv3, and Zscan4 gene families (Fig. 1B). We then examined the expression of representative maternal factors and pluripotent factors, but found that none of them showed obvious changes in expression (Fig. 1C).
Fig. 1.
Depletion of H2A.X led to misregulation of ZGA genes in mESCs. A: Dot-and-box plot shows higher expression (log2FPKM) of ZGA genes in ERVL-positive mESCs than ERVL-negative mESCs. Similarly, expression of ZGA genes was higher in H2A.X KO mESCs than the control. Displayed using a dot-and-box plot. B: Heatmap of abundance (log2FPKM) of representative ZGA genes in H2A.X KO mESCs and control. Expression of Zscan4 family genes in two groups is also shown by heatmap. C: Expression changes (log2Fold change of FPKM) of maternal and pluripotent factors in H2A.X KO versus control mESCs.
The expression of ZGA genes is regulated by activators and repressors in mESCs. To identify how ZGA genes were activated in the absence of H2A.X in mESCs, we examined the expression of reported ZGA regulators in the transcriptome of mESCs before and after H2A.X depletion (Fig. 2A). We found that in H2A.X knockout mESCs, only the two ZGA activators, Dux and Zscan4, were upregulated. As a master activator of ZGA genes, Dux can stimulate ZGA genes, including Zscan4 family genes [29,30,31], and Zscan4 also upregulates the Dux gene [32, 33]. To identify whether H2A.X is directly associated with genomic loci of ZGA activators, we analyzed ChIP-seq results of H2A.X in mESCs. Interestingly, we observed a signal of H2A.X occupancy at the Dux locus, instead of the Zscan4 genes (Fig. 2B). This result showed that ZGA genes were repressed by H2A.X-mediated Dux downregulation via direct incorporation of H2A.X at the Dux locus. To identify whether Dux upregulation significantly contributed to H2A.X-mediated repression of ZGA genes, the fold change of ZGA gene expression was compared between the H2A.X knockout group and the Dux overexpression group (Fig. 2C). We noticed that genes with higher upregulation induced by Dux had increased expression in the absence of H2A.X, supporting the critical role of Dux in H2A.X-mediated ZGA gene silencing. We also examined the expression of TEs before and after H2A.X knockout (Fig. 2D). As expected, ERVL, a direct target of Dux, was upregulated in mESCs deficient in H2A.X. Moreover, ERVK expression was downregulated when H2A.X was depleted.
Fig. 2.
H2A.X regulates ZGA genes and TEs in mESCs. A: Fold change in expression (FPKM) of reported ZGA regulators in H2A.X KO versus control mESCs. Orange and aqua indicate the ZGA gene activator and repressor, respectively. B: Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) visualization of H2A.X occupancy at the Dux locus and Zscan4 family gene locus in mESCs. C: Scatterplot showing the correlation of enhanced ZGA gene expression upon Dux overexpression versus H2A.X KO in mESCs. D: Abundance of subfamilies of TEs in control and H2A.X KO mESCs. Note that ERVK and ERVL were misregulated in the absence of H2A.X.
To understand how H2A.X and other H2A variants are involved in totipotency establishment, it is important to investigate their deposition in cleavage embryos expressing ZGA genes and blastocysts with silenced ZGA genes and activated pluripotency networks. Deposition of H2A variants in mouse early embryos was previously identified [34], with nuclear deposition of histone H2A variants changed during preimplantation development. Generally, all of the H2A variants were abundantly incorporated and deposited into chromatin in oocytes, but only H2A.X was significantly incorporated into 1–2-cell stage embryos, and macroH2A, H2A.Z, and H2A were enriched in the chromatin of blastocysts. In this study, we collected human cleavage-stage embryos (Fig. 3A, Supplementary Fig. 1) and blastocysts (Fig. 3B) to examine the deposition of H2A variants by immunofluorescence using specific antibodies. We found that H2A.X, canonical H2A, and H2A.Z were deposited in both human cleavage stage (8-to-16-cell) embryos and blastocysts. However, macroH2A was detectable only in the blastocyst stage. Although there are differences in the deposition of H2A variants between human and mouse embryos, H2A.X in H2A variants was consistently enriched during the ZGA period in both human and mouse embryos.
Fig. 3.
Representative images of H2A variant deposition in early human embryos. Human cleavage-stage embryos (A) and blastocysts (B) were collected and stained with antibodies to different H2A variants, including H2A.X (n = 5 and 4, respectively), H2A and H2A.Z (co-stained; n = 6 and 5, respectively), and macroH2A (n = 5 and 4, respectively). Hoechst stain was used to stain the DNA.
Discussion
Stimulation of ZGA genes is required for the establishment of totipotency and occurs during cellular reprogramming. Currently, the most famous factor for direct ZGA stimulation is the transcription factor Dux. Dux is activated during the ZGA process with unclear mechanisms and can improve reprogramming efficiency [35]. Although Dux deficiency during development is not lethal [36], insufficient ZGA and reduced survivability of embryos have been reported [37]. One possible reason may be that more Dux paralogs exist in the mouse genome [38]. Another intriguing event accompanied by ZGA is the activation of the TEs. TEs are enriched in early embryos and is involved in complex regulatory networks, including controlling the timing of ZGA [39, 40]. Despite extensive studies on the regulation of ZGA and TEs, important regulatory factors and mechanisms remain largely unexplored. In the current study, we used mESCs as a cellular model to identify if H2A.X inhibits Dux-mediated ZGA gene expression through direct binding at the Dux locus. Additionally, two subfamilies of TEs, ERVK and ERVL, were misregulated. ERVL is directly activated by Dux and is therefore indirectly repressed by H2A.X. In contrast, ERVK may be regulated by indirect activation by H2A.X.
We also demonstrated that H2A.X is the major H2A variant deposited into chromatin in both mouse and human cleavage-stage embryos with ZGA activity. In mice, major ZGA occurs at the 2-cell stage, whereas in humans, major ZGA occurs in the 4-8 cell cleavage stage. Our current research demonstrated that the histone variant H2A.X showed an enrichment trend in human cleavage-stage embryos. Combined with previous studies that found that H2A.X is specifically expressed in mouse embryos at the 1-2 cell stage [25], all of these results indicate that H2A.X may play a special role in the process of maternal to zygotic transition (Table 1). We propose that proper amount of H2A.X ensures ZGA genes and TEs to be at relatively normal expression levels, and in preimplantation embryos, dynamic H2A.X incorporation at ZGA/TEs loci may finely modulate expression of ZGA/TEs for developmental progression. Previously, we found that histone H3 variant H3.3 played an inhibitory role in regulating ZGA genes [41]. Therefore, we propose that H2A.X/H3.3-containing nucleosomes may have unique chromatin structures that may feature totipotency and ZGA events. It has been reported that H3.3/H2A.Z-containing nucleosomes are relatively more unstable to allow accessibility of transcription factors [42], and unique features may also apply to H3.3/H2A.X-containing nucleosomes.
Table 1. Comparison of expression pattern of H2A variants between human and mouse.
| IF signal of H2A variant | Cleavage stage | Blastocyst stage | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (ZGA stage) | ||||
| Human | H2A.X | Strong | H2A.X | Strong |
| H2A | Strong | H2A | Strong | |
| H2A.Z | Strong | H2A.Z | Strong | |
| macroH2A | undetectable | macroH2A | Strong | |
| Mouse [34] | H2A.X | Strong | H2A.X | Weak |
| H2A | Weak | H2A | Strong | |
| H2A.Z | undetectable | H2A.Z | Strong | |
| macroH2A | undetectable | macroH2A | Strong | |
Future studies should include how H2A.X represses ZGA in mESCs, functions of phosphorylated H2A.X in regulation of ZGA and TEs through point mutagenesis in mESCs, characteristics and physical structures of H2A.X-containing nucleosomes in early mouse embryos, and elucidating chromatin associations of different H2A variants in mouse and human early embryos.
Collectively, our results show that H2A.X regulates cleavage embryo genes and TEs in mice, and may also be present in humans because of its abundance in human cleavage embryos (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplementary
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1004001, 2018YFC1004502], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 31771661], and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [2019kfyXKJC074].
References
- 1.Burton A, Torres-Padilla ME. Chromatin dynamics in the regulation of cell fate allocation during early embryogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014; 15: 723–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ishiuchi T, Torres-Padilla ME. Towards an understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of totipotency. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013; 23: 512–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wu G, Schöler HR. Lineage segregation in the totipotent embryo. Curr Top Dev Biol 2016; 117: 301–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Macfarlan TS, Gifford WD, Driscoll S, Lettieri K, Rowe HM, Bonanomi D, Firth A, Singer O, Trono D, Pfaff SL. Embryonic stem cell potency fluctuates with endogenous retrovirus activity. Nature 2012; 487: 57–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Le R, Huang Y, Zhao A, Gao S. Lessons from expanded potential of embryonic stem cells: Moving toward totipotency. J Genet Genomics 2020; 47: 123–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Turinetto V, Giachino C. Histone variants as emerging regulators of embryonic stem cell identity. Epigenetics 2015; 10: 563–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sarma K, Reinberg D. Histone variants meet their match. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6: 139–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ding D, Nguyen TT, Pang MYH, Ishibashi T. Primate-specific histone variants. Genome 2021; 64: 337–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Maze I, Noh KM, Soshnev AA, Allis CD. Every amino acid matters: essential contributions of histone variants to mammalian development and disease. Nat Rev Genet 2014; 15: 259–271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Biterge B, Schneider R. Histone variants: key players of chromatin. Cell Tissue Res 2014; 356: 457–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.van Daal A, Elgin SC. A histone variant, H2AvD, is essential in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Cell 1992; 3: 593–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu X, Li B, Gorovsky MA. Essential and nonessential histone H2A variants in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16: 4305–4311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Faast R, Thonglairoam V, Schulz TC, Beall J, Wells JR, Taylor H, Matthaei K, Rathjen PD, Tremethick DJ, Lyons I. Histone variant H2A.Z is required for early mammalian development. Curr Biol 2001; 11: 1183–1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Allis CD, Glover CV, Bowen JK, Gorovsky MA. Histone variants specific to the transcriptionally active, amitotically dividing macronucleus of the unicellular eucaryote, Tetrahymena thermophila. Cell 1980; 20: 609–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Brickner DG, Cajigas I, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Ahmed S, Lee PC, Widom J, Brickner JH. H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol 2007; 5: e81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chadwick BP, Willard HF. Histone H2A variants and the inactive X chromosome: identification of a second macroH2A variant. Hum Mol Genet 2001; 10: 1101–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Costanzi C, Pehrson JR. Histone macroH2A1 is concentrated in the inactive X chromosome of female mammals. Nature 1998; 393: 599–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pasque V, Radzisheuskaya A, Gillich A, Halley-Stott RP, Panamarova M, Zernicka-Goetz M, Surani MA, Silva JC. Histone variant macroH2A marks embryonic differentiation in vivo and acts as an epigenetic barrier to induced pluripotency. J Cell Sci 2012; 125: 6094–6104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gaspar-Maia A, Qadeer ZA, Hasson D, Ratnakumar K, Leu NA, Leroy G, Liu S, Costanzi C, Valle-Garcia D, Schaniel C, Lemischka I, Garcia B, Pehrson JR, Bernstein E. MacroH2A histone variants act as a barrier upon reprogramming towards pluripotency. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 1565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Talbert PB, Henikoff S. Environmental responses mediated by histone variants. Trends Cell Biol 2014; 24: 642–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Redon C, Pilch D, Rogakou E, Sedelnikova O, Newrock K, Bonner W. Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2002; 12: 162–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bernstein E, Hake SB. The nucleosome: a little variation goes a long way. Biochem Cell Biol 2006; 84: 505–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 5858–5868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, Bonner WM. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J Cell Biol 1999; 146: 905–916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wu T, Liu Y, Wen D, Tseng Z, Tahmasian M, Zhong M, Rafii S, Stadtfeld M, Hochedlinger K, Xiao A. Histone variant H2A.X deposition pattern serves as a functional epigenetic mark for distinguishing the developmental potentials of iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell 2014; 15: 281–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jin Y, Tam OH, Paniagua E, Hammell M. TEtranscripts: a package for including transposable elements in differential expression analysis of RNA-seq datasets. Bioinformatics 2015; 31: 3593–3599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Eckersley-Maslin MA, Svensson V, Krueger C, Stubbs TM, Giehr P, Krueger F, Miragaia RJ, Kyriakopoulos C, Berrens RV, Milagre I, Walter J, Teichmann SA, Reik W. MERVL/Zscan4 network activation results in transient genome-wide DNA demethylation of mESCs. Cell Reports 2016; 17: 179–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fu X, Wu X, Djekidel MN, Zhang Y. Myc and Dnmt1 impede the pluripotent to totipotent state transition in embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 2019; 21: 835–844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Whiddon JL, Langford AT, Wong CJ, Zhong JW, Tapscott SJ. Conservation and innovation in the DUX4-family gene network. Nat Genet 2017; 49: 935–940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.De Iaco A, Planet E, Coluccio A, Verp S, Duc J, Trono D. DUX-family transcription factors regulate zygotic genome activation in placental mammals. Nat Genet 2017; 49: 941–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hendrickson PG, Doráis JA, Grow EJ, Whiddon JL, Lim JW, Wike CL, Weaver BD, Pflueger C, Emery BR, Wilcox AL, Nix DA, Peterson CM, Tapscott SJ, Carrell DT, Cairns BR. Conserved roles of mouse DUX and human DUX4 in activating cleavage-stage genes and MERVL/HERVL retrotransposons. Nat Genet 2017; 49: 925–934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang W, Chen F, Chen R, Xie D, Yang J, Zhao X, Guo R, Zhang Y, Shen Y, Göke J, Liu L, Lu X. Zscan4c activates endogenous retrovirus MERVL and cleavage embryo genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47: 8485–8501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hirata T, Amano T, Nakatake Y, Amano M, Piao Y, Hoang HG, Ko MS. Zscan4 transiently reactivates early embryonic genes during the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep 2012; 2: 208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nashun B, Yukawa M, Liu H, Akiyama T, Aoki F. Changes in the nuclear deposition of histone H2A variants during pre-implantation development in mice. Development 2010; 137: 3785–3794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yang G, Zhang L, Liu W, Qiao Z, Shen S, Zhu Q, Gao R, Wang M, Wang M, Li C, Liu M, Sun J, Wang L, Liu W, Cui X, Zhao K, Zang R, Chen M, Liang Z, Wang L, Kou X, Zhao Y, Wang H, Wang Y, Gao S, Chen J, Jiang C. Dux-mediated corrections of aberrant H3K9ac during 2-cell genome activation optimize efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell Stem Cell 2021; 28: 150–163.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chen Z, Zhang Y. Loss of DUX causes minor defects in zygotic genome activation and is compatible with mouse development. Nat Genet 2019; 51: 947–951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Guo M, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Bi Y, Xu J, Xu C, Kou X, Zhao Y, Li Y, Tu Z, Liu K, Lin J, Yang P, Gao S, Wang Y. Precise temporal regulation of Dux is important for embryo development. Cell Res 2019; 29: 956–959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sugie K, Funaya S, Kawamura M, Nakamura T, Suzuki MG, Aoki F. Expression of Dux family genes in early preimplantation embryos. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 19396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Percharde M, Lin CJ, Yin Y, Guan J, Peixoto GA, Bulut-Karslioglu A, Biechele S, Huang B, Shen X, Ramalho-Santos M. A LINE1-nucleolin partnership regulates early development and ESC identity. Cell 2018; 174: 391–405.e19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lu JY, Shao W, Chang L, Yin Y, Li T, Zhang H, Hong Y, Percharde M, Guo L, Wu Z, Liu L, Liu W, Yan P, Ramalho-Santos M, Sun Y, Shen X. Genomic repeats categorize genes with distinct functions for orchestrated regulation. Cell Rep 2020; 30: 3296–3311.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tian Q, Wang XF, Xie SM, Yin Y, Zhou LQ. H3.3 impedes zygotic transcriptional program activated by Dux. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020; 522: 422–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jin C, Zang C, Wei G, Cui K, Peng W, Zhao K, Felsenfeld G. H3.3/H2A.Z double variant-containing nucleosomes mark ‘nucleosome-free regions’ of active promoters and other regulatory regions. Nat Genet 2009; 41: 941–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



