Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology logoLink to Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
. 2021 Oct 22;9:731712. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.731712

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of Porcine lncMGPF Regulate Meat Production Traits by Affecting RNA Stability

Wei Lv 1,2,, Shiyu Zhao 1,2,, Yunqing Hou 1,2, Qian Tong 1,2, Yaxin Peng 1,2, Jianan Li 1,2, Zaiyan Xu 1,3, Bo Zuo 1,2,4,5,6,7,*
PMCID: PMC8569700  PMID: 34746128

Abstract

lncMGPF is a novel positive regulator of myogenic differentiation, muscle growth and regeneration in mouse, pig, and human. But whether natural mutations within lncMGPF gene regulate animal meat production traits is unclear. In this study, ten single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of pig lncMGPF (plncMGPF) gene were identified among commercial pig breeds and Chinese local pig breeds. These SNPs are highly linked and constructed into multiple haplotypes, and haplotype ATTCATGTTC (H1) mainly exists in commercial pig breeds while haplotype GCCTGCACCT (H3) is more frequent in Chinese local pig breeds. Association analysis indicated that all SNPs are significantly associated with the backfat thickness and loin muscle area (P < 0.05), respectively, and homologous H1 individuals have higher loin muscle area and lower backfat thickness than H3 pigs. Bioinformatics and functional analysis showed that haplotype H1 has a longer half-life and more stable RNA secondary structure than haplotype H3. plncMGPF haplotype H1 has stronger effects on pig primary myogenic progenitor cells differentiation and muscle growth than haplotype H3. Further experiments showed that two SNPs (rs81403974 and rs325492834) function together to confer plncMGPF stability and function. Our observation suggested that the SNPs in lncMGPF can change the RNA stabilities and lncMGPF function, thereby affecting the porcine meat production traits.

Keywords: lncMGPF, SNPs, meat production traits, RNA stability, pig

Introduction

Skeletal muscle is a highly heterogeneous tissue, which plays an important role in the metabolism and movement maintenance of human and animal body (Ge et al., 2019; Han et al., 2019). It is also the tissue source of lean meat in agricultural animals. Therefore, it is of great scientific significance to study the growth and development of skeletal muscle fiber in medicine and agricultural animal production. Adult skeletal muscle is composed of muscle fibers, basement membrane, satellite cells, immune cells, and nerves (Koning et al., 2012; Guo et al., 2018). The formation process of muscle fibers can be divided into embryonic stage and postnatal stage (Buckingham and Relaix, 2007). Embryonic myogenesis includes differentiation of muscle progenitor cells into myoblasts, proliferation of myoblasts, and the process is regulated by a series of important proteins and transcription factors such as Six1/4-pax3/7-MyoD-MyoG-MyHC (Buckingham and Relaix, 2007); Muscle progenitor cells can also differentiate into muscle satellite cells (Musc). The process of postnatal muscle fiber formation is completed by Musc. After activation, Musc will go through a similar process to that in embryonic stage to achieve postnatal muscle fiber damage repair, namely muscle regeneration (Tajbakhsh, 2009). In addition, epigenetics and external environment also affect the embryonic development and regeneration of muscle fibers.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a kind of RNAs with transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides and do not encode functional proteins (Quinn and Chang, 2016). LncRNAs are involved in the regulation of gene expression, epigenetics, cell differentiation, apoptosis, metabolism, signal transduction and immune response (Zhang et al., 2019). Recently, the significant associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in lncRNAs with the phenotypes were reported, such as disease occurrence (Zheng et al., 2020), muscle growth (Zhou et al., 2018), muscle fiber width and muscle fiber roundness (Ren et al., 2017). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) also detected many significant loci that affect disease susceptibility in the genomic regions encoding lncRNAs (McLaren et al., 2015; Hua et al., 2018). For example, the SNP sites (rs2288947 and rs8113645) located in the lncRNA TINCR were confirmed to be associated with bladder cancer (Xu et al., 2021). A SNP (rs3850997), which is located in the 16p13 locus, regulates the expression of lncRNA GCLET and is involved in the development of gastric cancer (Du et al., 2020). The SNP of lncRNA lnc13 controls lnc13 nucleocytoplasmic localization and the binding ability with PRC2 protein. In addition, SNPs in lncRNAs also affect the immune response and inflammatory response (Gonzalez-Moro et al., 2020). However, the potential effects of SNPs in lncRNAs on the muscle growth and development in pigs remain largely unexplored. Our previous study showed that lncMGPF is a novel positive regulator of myogenesis in mouse, pig, and human (Lv et al., 2020). In this study, we investigated the allele frequency distribution of SNPs located in the genomic region of plncMGPF gene among Chinese local pig breeds and commercial pig breeds, their effects on pig meat production traits and underlying molecular mechanisms. There are significant differences in allele frequencies and phenotypes between Chinese local pig breeds and commercial pig breeds owing to the difference of selection intensity. Compared with the fat-type Chinese local pigs, the meat-type commercial pigs have faster growth rate, higher carcass lean percentage and feed conversion efficiency. The results demonstrated that SNPs located in lncMGPF affect the stability of lncMGPF RNA and pig muscle growth. These observations provide an important evidence that SNPs in lncRNAs can regulate the meat production traits by affecting lncRNA functions in pigs.

Materials and Methods

Animals

All procedures involving animals were performed in according to the guidelines of good laboratory practice, and animals were supplied with nutritious food and adequate water. Animal feeding and tests were conducted based on the National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Huazhong Agricultural University. Piglets were slaughtered in accordance with a standard procedure based on guidelines in the Regulation of the Standing Committee of Hubei People’s Congress (Hubei Province, China, HZAUSW-2017-008). The source of the commercial pigs (113 French Large White pigs, 458 American Large White pigs, 105 French Landrace pigs, 41 American Landrace pigs) are from Zhejiang Kaisheng Ecological Agriculture Development Company and the Chinese local pigs (16 Enshi hei pigs, 8 Bamei pigs, 20 Jianli pigs, 12 Yangxin pigs, 17 Wannan pigs, and 25 Huainan pigs) breeds are from the places of origin.

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Screening, Linkage Disequilibrium, and Haplotype Analysis

Blood samples were collected from the above pigs. Genomic DNA was extracted by using Multisource Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (AXYGEN, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. One pair of primers were used to amplify the Exon1 of the plncMGPF gene sequence. Two pairs of primers were used to amplify the Exon1 and Exon2 (Supplementary Table 1). PCR amplification was performed in a total volume of 20 μL PrimeSTAR HS (Premix) (Takara) with 1 μL of DNA template and 0.5 μL of each primer. The conditions of PCR included initial heating at 95°C for 5 min, 34 cycles of 30 s for denaturation at 95°C, 30 s for annealing at 60°C and 60 s for extension at 72°C, followed by a 5-min extension at 72°C. The PCR products were sequenced by Chromas (Sangon Biotecn, China). All primers used were designed by Primer Premier 5.0 software and synthesized by Sangon Biotechnology Company Limited (Shanghai, China). Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype test results were analyzed by Haploview v.4.2.

Measurement of Meat Production Traits and Association Analysis

The backfat thickness and loin muscle area were measured at the third and fourth ribs of pigs, 4–5 cm from the dorsal midline, by using B scan, and the measured data were obtained after calibration by the breeding software GBS 5.0. The association analysis was done by using the GLM model with SAS statistical software (SAS Institute Inc., Version 8.0). The GLM statistical model used is:

Tijkl=μ+Gi+Fj+Sk+Bl+eijklm

where Yijkl is the trait phenotype value; μ is the average value, Gi is the genotype effect; Fj, Sk, and Bl are fixed effects, which represent the family, sex, and batch effects, respectively; eijklm is the residual effect.

Isolation and Culture of Primary Myogenic Progenitor Cells

Mouse primary myogenic progenitor cells and porcine primary myogenic progenitor cells were isolated from 5-week-old C57BL mice and 1-day-old large white pigs, respectively. Primary myogenic progenitor cells were isolated and cultured as described previously (Yue et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018). Briefly, muscle isolated from mouse or porcine skeletal muscle was minced and digested in 2 mg/ml of type I collagenase (C0130; Sigma-Aldrich, United States). Digestion was stopped with RPMI 1640 medium containing 20% foetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, United States). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 growth medium supplemented with 20% FBS, 4 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor, 1% chicken embryo extract, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2. The proliferating cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Induction of differentiation was started after all cells were grown to 80–90%.

Construction of the Overexpression Vectors and Cell Transfection

The full-length plncMGPF sequence of H1 haplotype (ATTCATGTTC) and full-length plncMGPF sequence of H3 haplotype (GCCTGCACCT) were synthesized by Sangon Biotechnology Company Limited (Shanghai, China). The sequences of plncMGPF-H1 and plncMGPF-H3 were subcloned into the KpnI and XbaI sites of the pcDNA3.1 vector, respectively. Mouse and pig primary myogenic progenitor cells were seeded on six-well plates. After the cell confluence reached 70–80%, cells were transfected with 4 μg pcDNA3.1-plncMGPF-H1, 4 μg pcDNA3.1-plncMGPF-H3, or 4 μg of pcDNA3.1 vector with 9 μL Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, United States). Cells were harvested after 24 h in GM and 72 h in DM for differentiation detection. All primers used in plasmid construction are presented in Supplementary Table 2.

Lentivirus Packaging and Infection

To construct lentivirus-mediated overexpression vectors for plncMGPF, the sequences of plncMGPF-H1 and plncMGPF-H3 were subcloned into the XbaI and BamHI sites of the PCDH vector. We packaged the lentivirus in 293T cells using three vectors: 10.7 μg PCDH-plncMGPF-H1 or PCDH-plncMGPF-H3, 8.0 μg psPAX2 (Addgene, United States), and 5.3 μg PDM2.G (Addgene, United States). For mouse muscle infection, we injected 60 μL plncMGPF-H1 and plncMGPF-H3 overexpression lentivirus vector into the Gas muscles of the left and right legs, respectively, of five 1-month-old mice (WT) every 7 days. Gas muscles were sampled after 4 weeks of weekly injections. The lentivirus concentration used in all the assays was above 1 × 108 transducing units (TU)/ml.

Total RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay

Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, United States) and reverse transcription was performed using RevertAid reverse transcriptase (Thermo Scientific, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses were performed using the Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus real-time PCR system. Relative RNA expression was calculated using the Ct (2–ΔΔCt) method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). All primers used in qRT-PCR are presented in Supplementary Table 1.

Western Blotting

Proteins were extracted from the cells using a strong protein lysis solution (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). Western blotting was performed as described previously (Zhang et al., 2016). The antibodies used included MyoG (sc-12732; 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, United States), MyoD (sc-760; 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, United States), MyHC (sc-376157; 1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, United States), and β-actin (sc-4777; 1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, United States). All protein levels were normalized to that of the housekeeping protein β-actin, and densitometric quantification of western blot strips was performed using ImageJ software.

Prediction of Long Non-coding RNA Secondary Structures and Stability Assay

Predicting the secondary structure and free energy of two plncMGPF mutants using RNAfold.1 For lncRNA stability assay, pig primary myogenic progenitor cells were cultured in six-well plates until 70–80% confluence and then transfected with pcDNA3.1-plncMGPF-H1 or pcDNA3.1-plncMGPF-H3. At 24 h after transfection, actinomycin D (ActD; 20 μg/mL) was added to the culture media to block RNA transcription. At selected time points (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h), the cells were washed twice with PBS and then lysed directly in culture dishes using 1 mL Trizol Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, United States). Then the RNA was used to detect lncRNA stability by qRT-PCR.

Cell Immunofluorescence Staining

Cell immunofluorescence staining was performed as described previously (Dey et al., 2014). The antibodies included MyHC (sc-376157; 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, United States), MyoG (sc-12732; 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, United States), and a secondary antibody (anti-mouse CY3; Beyotime Biotechnology, United States). DAPI is used to visualize cell nuclei under a fluorescent microscope (DP80; Olympus, Japan). The differentiation index was calculated as the percentage of nucleus in MyHC positive cells. The fusion index was calculated as the percentage of nuclei in fused myotubes which have two or more nuclei out of the total nuclei (Nie et al., 2020).

Histology Staining

Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining of muscle sections was performed as described previously (Zhu et al., 2017). The cross-sectional areas of individual myofibers were quantified using ImageJ software. Immunohistochemical staining was performed according to a previously reported method (Hindi et al., 2017). Visualized using a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM800; Zeiss). The antibodies used included dystrophin (ab15277; 1:100; Abcam, United Kingdom), EGFP (ab6556; 1:200; Abcam, United Kingdom), and anti-rabbit (FITC; Beyotime Biotechnology, United States).

Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate or quintuplicate, and a representative experiment was selected for presentation. The biological replicates of each individual experiment are described in the figure legends. Data were presented as the mean ± SEM. All differences among groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or paired Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 () and P < 0.01 (∗∗) were considered to be significantly different.

Results

Ten Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Pig lncMGPF Gene Are in Linkage Disequilibrium and Significantly Associated With Meat Production Traits

Direct sequencing of the plncMGPF gene was performed to detect potential polymorphisms in lean-type commercial pigs and fat-type Chinese local pigs. Ten SNPs located in the first exon of plncMGPF (c.35G > A, c.145C > T, c.196C > T, c.265T > C, c.273G > A, c.312C > T, c.315A > G, c.351C > T, c.358C > T, c.416T > C) were detected (Figure 1A). No SNPs were found in the second exon (Supplementary Table 3). Genetic diversity analysis was performed to calculate genetic indices (Ho, He, Ne, and PIC) in American Large White pigs (Table 1). According to the classification of PIC value (PIC value < 0.25, low polymorphism; 0.25 < PIC value < 0.5, intermediate polymorphism; and PIC value > 0.5, high polymorphism), ten SNPs of the plncMGPF gene mainly belong to intermediate polymorphism in American Large White pigs. The above ten SNPs were analyzed separately for their association with the meat production traits, and the results showed that all SNPs were significantly associated with the backfat thickness and loin muscle area in American Large White pigs (P < 0.05) (Table 2 and Supplementary Data sheet 1). Then the ten SNPs were selected for further linkage disequilibrium analysis. The results suggested that the ten SNPs are in strong linkage disequilibrium in American Large White pigs (r2 > 0.33) (Figures 1B,C). We constructed a haplotype block, which can form seven major haplotypes in different pig breeds (Supplementary Table 4). The three haplotypes in American Large White pigs were used for further haplotype association analysis (Table 3). The results indicated the three haplotypes produced four haplotype combinations in American Large White pigs. The haplotype combinations were also significantly associated with the backfat thickness and loin muscle area (P < 0.05), and the pigs with haplotype combination H1-H1 had the lowest backfat thickness and the highest loin muscle area. We further inferred the haplotypes of the plncMGPF gene in different pig breeds, and found that the dominant haplotype was H1 in commercial pig breeds and haplotype H3 in local pig breeds, and the haplotype frequencies were significantly different among commercial pigs and Chinese local pigs (Table 4).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Linkage disequilibrium analysis of SNPs of plncMGPF gene. (A) SNPs distribution of lncMGPF gene in American Large White pigs. (B,C) The linkage disequilibrium analysis between the ten SNPs of plncMGPF gene in American Large White pigs. The value of D′ (B) and r2 (C) shows that the SNPs of plncMGPF are in strong linkage disequilibrium. D represents the difference between observed and expected haplotype frequencies, D′ corresponds to D standardized by the maximum value and it can take (D/Dmax). r2 = D2/PA (1-PA) PB (1-PB). PA and PB are defined as the frequency of alleles A and B at each locus.

TABLE 1.

Genetic parameters of plncMGPF in American Large White pigs.

SNPs Number Genotype frequency Allelic frequency Ho He Ne PIC
rs341915081 (c.35G > A) 458 GG GA AA G A 0.656 0.344 1.525 0.285
24/0.052 154/0.336 280/0.611 0.221 0.779
rs81403974 (c.145C > T) 458 CC CT TT C T 0.665 0.335 1.504 0.279
20/0.044 155/0.338 283/0.618 0.213 0.787
rs340851967 (c.196C > T) 458 CC CT TT C T 0.665 0.335 1.504 0.279
20/0.044 155/0.338 283/0.618 0.213 0.787
rs334887594 (c.265T > C) 458 TT TC CC T C 0.661 0.339 1.512 0.281
21/0.046 156/0.341 281/0.614 0.216 0.784
rs341430008 (c.273G > A) 458 GG GA AA G A 0.662 0.338 0.510 0.281
21/0.046 155/0.338 282/0.616 0.215 0.785
rs334239243 (c.312C > T) 458 CC CT TT C T 0.665 0.335 1.504 0.279
20/0.044 155/0.338 283/0.618 0.213 0.787
rs325492834 (c.315A > G) 458 AA AG GG A G 0.665 0.335 1.504 0.279
20/0.044 155/0.338 283/0.618 0.213 0.787
rs338858847 (c.351C > T) 458 CC CT TT C T 0.664 0.336 1.507 0.280
20/0.044 156/0.341 282/0.616 0.214 0.786
rs697981403 (c.358C > T) 458 CC CT TT C T 0.520 0.480 1.923 0.365
62/0.135 242/0.528 154/0.336 0.400 0.600
rs318048780 (c.416T > C) 458 TT TC CC T C 0.518 0.482 1.932 0.366
70/0.153 232/0.507 156/0.341 0.406 0.594

The number of individuals and genotype frequencies are indicated before and after “/”, respectively.

Ho, gene homozygosity; He, gene heterozygosity; Ne, effective number of alleles; PIC, polymorphism information content.

TABLE 2.

Association between ten SNPs of plncMGPF gene and carcass traits in American Large White pigs.

SNPs Genotype Backfat thickness (mm) Loin muscle area (cm2)
rs341915081 (c.35G > A) GG 10.130.28a 38.111.44a
GA 9.670.17ab 40.890.87ab
AA 9.480.14b 41.270.69b
rs81403974 (c.145C > T) CC 10.210.30a 38.111.44a
CT 9.670.17ab 40.890.87ab
TT 9.480.14b 41.270.69b
rs340851967 (c.196C > T) CC 10.210.30a 38.111.44a
CT 9.670.17ab 40.890.87ab
TT 9.480.14b 41.270.69b
rs334887594 (c.265T > C) TT 10.220.29a 38.111.44a
TC 9.670.17ab 40.890.87ab
CC 9.470.14b 41.270.69b
rs341430008 (c.273G > A) GG 10.220.29a 38.111.44a
GA 9.670.17ab 40.890.87ab
AA 9.470.14b 41.270.69b
rs334239243 (c.312C > T) CC 10.220.29a 38.111.44a
CT 9.670.17ab 40.890.87ab
TT 9.470.14b 41.270.69b
rs325492834 (c.315A > G) AA 10.220.29a 38.111.44a
AG 9.670.17ab 40.890.87ab
GG 9.470.14b 41.270.69b
rs338858847 (c.351C > T) CC 10.220.29a 38.111.44a
CT 9.670.17ab 40.890.87ab
TT 9.470.14b 41.270.69b
rs697981403 (c.358C > T) CC 9.800.19ab 39.461.05a
CT 9.720.14a 40.530.72ab
TT 9.440.16b 41.770.81b
rs318048780 (c.416T > C) TT 9.840.19a 39.461.05a
TC 9.730.14a 40.530.72ab
CC 9.420.16b 41.770.81b

The above values are “average values standard errors.”

In each group of SNPs, the same letter in the same column indicates that the difference is not significant (P > 0.05).

When the letters are different, lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), and uppercase letters indicate extremely significant differences (P < 0.01).

TABLE 3.

Association of haplotype combination of plncMGPF gene with meat production traits in American Large White pigs.

Haplotype combination Backfat thickness (mm) Loin muscle area (cm2)
H1-H1 9.550.18a 41.790.85a
H1-H2 9.650.18ab 40.400.87ab
H1-H3 9.960.22b 38.551.37b
H2-H2 9.270.39a 40.912.22ab

The above values are “average values ± standard errors.”

In each group of SNPs, the same letter in the same column indicates that the difference is not significant (P > 0.05).

When the letters are different, lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), and uppercase letters indicate extremely significant differences (P < 0.01).

TABLE 4.

Haplotype frequencies of plncMGPF gene among pig breeds.

Breed Number H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7
French Large White pigs 113 0.788 0.190 0.018
American Large White pigs 458 0.587 0.198 0.215
French Landrace pigs 106 0.363 0.142 0.439 0.014
American Landrace pigs 41 0.414 0.158 0.341 0.037 0.025 0.012 0.012
Enshi hei pigs 16 0.109 0.078 0.813
Bamei pigs 8 0.470 0.530
Jianli pigs 20 1
Yangxin pigs 12 1
Wannan pigs 17 1
Huainan pigs 25 0.480 0.52

Haplotypes with frequencies greater than 0.01 were selected.

The Haplotypes of Pig lncMGPF Significantly Affect the Secondary Structures and the RNA Stability

Some studies have found that SNPs may change the secondary structure of lncRNA (Yang et al., 2021). We speculated that the SNPs of plncMGPF may change the secondary structures of plncMGPF. plncMGPF secondary structures were determined using RNAfold web server and the results showed that there was a significant difference in RNA stability between plncMGPF haplotypes H1 and H3. The predicted structures of the two plncMGPF haplotypes differed from each other. Furthermore, the minimal free energy of plncMGPF haplotypes H1 and H3 were –350.30 and –336.68 kcal/mol, respectively (Figure 2A). And there were more loops in the secondary structure of haplotype H3 than that of haplotype H1. These results indicated that the RNA secondary structure of plncMGPF haplotype H1 is more stable than that of haplotype H3.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

SNPs of plncMGPF significantly affect the secondary structures and the RNA stability. (A) Secondary structure and minimum free energy of plncMGPF haplotypes H1 and H3 predicted by RNAfold, respectively. (B,C) qRT-PCR of RNA stability assays in pig primary myogenic progenitor cells (B) and primary myogenic progenitor cells from lncMGPF KO mice (C) shows that the RNA stability of plncMGPF haplotype H1 is higher than H3, respectively. The relative RNA levels are normalized to β-actin. The data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. N.S. indicates statistical non-significance.

In order to further confirm this result, we transfected the two overexpression vectors of plncMGPF into pig primary myogenic progenitor cells and then treated cells with actinomycin D (ActD), which can inhibit the synthesis of RNA and interfere with the transcription process, to detect RNA stability. Results of qRT-PCR showed that the RNA stability of plncMGPF haplotype H1 was higher (Figure 2B). In order to eliminate the interference of endogenous plncMGPF, we transfected the two overexpression vectors of plncMGPF into primary myogenic progenitor cells from lncMGPF KO mice. Similarly, we treated cells with ActD and then detected the half-life of the two haplotypes of plncMGPF. Results of qRT-PCR showed that the haplotype H1 of plncMGPF had higher RNA stability (Figure 2C). The above results indicated that the SNPs of plncMGPF may change the secondary structure and RNA stability of plncMGPF.

Haplotype H1 of Pig lncMGPF Has Stronger Effects on Pig Primary Myogenic Progenitor Cell Differentiation and Muscle Growth Than Haplotype H3

In order to explore the effects of the two haplotypes of plncMGPF gene on muscle differentiation, we transfected the two overexpression vectors of lncMGPF into pig primary myogenic progenitor cells and differentiated for 2 days. Results of qRT-PCR and Western blotting for differentiated pig primary myogenic progenitor cells indicated that plncMGPF significantly increased mRNA and protein expression of the myogenic marker genes MyoD, MyoG, and MyHC, and plncMGPF haplotype H1 had stronger effect on pig primary myogenic progenitor cell differentiation compared with haplotype H3 (Figures 3A,B). MyHC and MyoG immunofluorescence staining for differentiated pig primary myogenic progenitor cells showed the similar results (Figures 3C,D). Moreover, we examine the expression of myogenic genes at various time points during myoblasts proliferation and differentiation (proliferating myoblasts and myoblasts at 2, 4, and 6 days after cell differentiation). Results of qRT-PCR indicated that haplotype H1 had stronger effects on cell differentiation than haplotype H3 (Figures 3E–H). Our previous study found that lncMGPF act as a molecular sponge of miR-135a-5p to attenuate the inhibitory effect of miR-135a-5p on MEF2C, thereby increasing the expression of MEF2C gene. To examine whether plncMGPF H1 functions more efficiently to attenuate the inhibitory effect of miR-135a-5p on MEF2C, we examined the expression of MEF2C during myoblast differentiation. The results of qRT-PCR showed that plncMGPF H1 functions more efficiently to attenuate the inhibitory effect of miR-135a-5p on MEF2C expression (Figure 3I).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

plncMGPF haplotype H1 has stronger effects on pig primary myogenic progenitor cell differentiation than H3. (A,B) qRT-PCR (A) and Western blotting (B) show that plncMGPF haplotype H1 has stronger effects on increasing the mRNA and protein expression of the myogenic marker genes MyoD, MyoG, and MyHC than plncMGPF haplotype H3. (C,D) Representative images of immunofluorescence staining for MyoG (C) and MyHC (D) in differentiated pig primary myogenic progenitor cells and quantification show that plncMGPF haplotype H1 has stronger effect on pig primary myogenic progenitor cell differentiation than plncMGPF haplotype H3. Scale bars, 50 μm (C) and 100 μm (D). (E–I) qRT-PCR results show that haplotype H1 had stronger effects on mRNA expression of the myogenic marker genes MyoD (F), MyoG (G), MyHC (H), and MEF2C (I) than haplotype H3 during pig primary myogenic progenitor cell differentiation. The relative RNA and protein levels are normalized to β-actin. The data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.

To determine the function of the two haplotypes of plncMGPF in muscle development in vivo, we injected the lentivirus-mediated overexpression vectors of plncMGPF haplotypes H1 (LV-plncMGPF-H1) and H3 (LV-plncMGPF-H3) intramuscularly into the left and right legs of 1-month-old WT mice, respectively. The EGFP immunofluorescence staining results showed no significant difference in infection efficiency between the LV-plncMGPF-H1 and LV-plncMGPF-H3 groups (Figures 4A,B). The weights of the whole leg, TA, Qu, and Gas muscles, as well as the mean cross-sectional areas of individual myofibers in the LV-plncMGPF-H1 group significantly increased compared with LV-plncMGPF-H3 group (Figures 4C–H). These results showed that the two haplotypes of plncMGPF have significant difference in muscle growth.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

plncMGPF haplotype H1 has stronger effects on muscle growth and development than H3. (A) Schematic diagram of the Gas muscle injection into 1-month-old WT mice with lentivirus-mediated plncMGPF-H1 (LV-plncMGPF-H1) or plncMGPF-H3 (LV-plncMGPF-H3) overexpression vectors. (B) Representative images of EGFP immunofluorescence staining and quantification of five independent experiments show that there is no significant difference in infection efficiency between the LV-plncMGPF-H1 and LV-plncMGPF-H3 groups after 21 days infection. Scale bar, 100 μm. Quantification of five independent experiments shows that plncMGPF haplotype H1 significantly increases the weights of whole leg (C), Gas (D), TA (E), and Qu (F) muscles of WT mice compared with haplotype H3; p-values are determined by paired t-test. Representative images of H&E staining (G) and dystrophin immunohistochemistry staining (H) of Gas, TA, and Qu muscles. Quantification of five independent experiments shows that plncMGPF haplotype H1 significantly increases the average cross-sectional area of individual myofibers in WT mice compared with haplotype H3. (I) qRT-PCR results show that two SNPs (rs81403974 and rs325492834) of plncMGPF play the key roles in increasing the mRNA expression of MyHC. Scale bar, 50 μm. A total of 150 myofibers/muscle/mouse are analyzed in an independent experiment. The data in (B,C) are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments; P-values are determined by paired t-test. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.

To explore clearly whether these 10 SNPs function together to confer plncMGPF stability or a subset of them is sufficient, we firstly predicted the effects of every SNP on the RNA stability of plncMGPF by RNAfold. The results showed that three SNPs (rs341915081, rs81403974, and rs325492834) could affect the stability of plncMGPF, and the stability is highest when these three SNPs are present at the same time (Table 5). Then, we overexpressed plncMGPF-H1, plncMGPF-H3, and plncMGPF-H3 vectors containing mutations of three SNPs in pig primary myogenic progenitor cells, respectively. Interestingly, the results revealed that two SNPs (rs81403974 and rs325492834) are the key loci and function together to confer plncMGPF stability and function (Figure 4I).

TABLE 5.

Minimum Free Energy of different haplotypes predicted by RNAfold.

graphic file with name fcell-09-731712-t005.jpg

Mutated nucleotides are marked in red.

Discussion

Single nucleotide polymorphisms are recognized as the most common type of genetic variation occurring with high frequency (Frazer et al., 2007; Li et al., 2017), and they are mostly located in non-coding regions. Multiple SNPs in linkage disequilibrium on the same chromosome can form haplotypes. In this study, Landrace pigs, Large White pigs and Chinese local pig breeds were used to detect the SNPs of plncMGPF and ten SNPs of plncMGPF (c.35G > A, c.145C > T, c.196C > T, c.265T > C, c.273G > A, c.312C > T, c.315A > G, c.351C > T, c.358C > T, c.416T > C) were detected in different pig breeds. Because of the relatively small population and scattered distribution of local pigs, our sampling number is limited. Therefore, the number of 10 populations from commercial and local pigs differs greatly and the sample size may affect SNP identification. However, the trend of haplotype frequency distribution among Chinese local pig breeds and commercial pig breeds is consistent with their phenotypes. Commercial pig breeds have higher frequency of haplotype H1 with increased meat production, which may be caused by the selection of high-yield meat in commercial pig breeds. Furthermore, ten SNPs are in linkage disequilibrium and significantly associated with the meat production traits. The haplotypes H1 and H3 are the major haplotypes in lean pig breeds and local pig breeds, respectively. Further association analysis showed that haplotype combinations are also significantly associated with the meat production traits. The QTL analysis results in Animal QTLdb2 showed that 82 reported QTLs affecting growth and meat quality traits are located in the genomic region containing plncMGPF.

Genetic variation of lncRNA may have an important role in disease susceptibility via affecting lncRNA binding capacity to proteins or miRNA and their loop structure (Guo et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2018; Fattahi Dolatabadi et al., 2020; Feng et al., 2020; Fu et al., 2020). For example, the interaction between MALAT1 target, miR-143-3p, and RALGAPA2 is affected by a functional SNP rs3827693 in breast cancer (Fattahi Dolatabadi et al., 2020). The SNP rs12982687 affects binding capacity of lncRNA UCA1 to miR-873-5p (Fu et al., 2020). Our previous study found that lncMGPF act as a molecular sponge of miR-135a-5p to attenuate the inhibitory effect of miR-135a-5p on MEF2C, thereby increasing the expression of MEF2C gene. Meanwhile, plncMGPF can also bind to the 3′UTR of MyoD and MyoG mRNAs by recruiting human antigen R (HuR) to increase the accumulation of HuR in the cytoplasm and enhance the stability of MyoD and MyoG mRNAs, thereby promoting myogenic differentiation (Lv et al., 2020). However, the 10 SNPs identified in this study are not located in the miR-135a-5p binding region or HuR binding region, indicating that the different haplotypes above do not directly affect the miRNA and plncMGPF/HuR/MyoD/MyoG pathways. A growing number of studies have shown that SNPs may influence RNA secondary structure and lncRNA expression levels (Chen et al., 2013; Minotti et al., 2018). For example, an SNP site (rs1015164) located in the first intron of lncRNA CCR5AS alters the expression of lncRNA CCR5AS and ultimately regulates the expression and function of co-receptor CCR5 (Kulkarni et al., 2019). The SNP rs1859168, which is located in the HOTTIP (HOXA distal transcript), a lncRNA transcribed from the 5′ tip of the HOXA locus, affects the expression and function of HOTTIP by reducing free energy to influence RNA secondary structure (Minotti et al., 2018). The SNP rs4081134 located in the lncRNA MEG3, influences the RNA secondary structure by decreasing free energy, which consequently affects the function of MEG3 (Yang et al., 2021). According to the RNAfold prediction, we found that plncMGPF haplotype H1 is more stable than H3. And ActD was used to treat pig primary myogenic progenitor cells to determine whether the two haplotypes of plncMGPF have different effects on lncRNA stability. The results demonstrated that the stability of haplotype H1 is higher than that of haplotype H3. Functional studies also confirmed that haplotype H1 has greater differentiation capacity than haplotype H3. Further experiments showed that only two SNPs (rs81403974 and rs325492834) function together to confer plncMGPF stability and function. Therefore, we concluded that the SNPs in plncMGPF change the RNA stabilities and lncMGPF function, thereby affecting the meat production traits.

In summary, we identified the functional SNPs that significantly affected pig meat production traits, and elucidated its regulatory mechanism by affecting the lncRNA stability. In pig breeding, increasing the allele frequencies of haplotype H1 will contribute to the genetic improvement of pig meat production traits.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Huazhong Agricultural University.

Author Contributions

BZ, WL, and SZ conceived and designed the research and wrote the manuscript. WL, SZ, QT, YH, and YP performed experiments. WL, SZ, QT, YH, and BZ analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank Wang F. C. for helping in the generation of gene knockout mice. We thank Hu S. Y., Li M.Y., and Yan D.C. for collecting blood samples and extracting DNA.

Funding Statement

This work was financially supported by the Science and Technology Major Project of Hubei Province (2020ABA016), the joint fund between Huazhong Agricultural University and Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (SZYJY2021009), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province to Bo Zuo (2021CFA018), and the Agricultural Innovation Fund of Hubei Province (2016-620-000-001-043).

Footnotes

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.731712/full#supplementary-material

Data_Sheet_1.XLS (208.5KB, XLS)
Data_Sheet_2.doc (60.5KB, doc)

References

  1. Buckingham M., Relaix F. (2007). The role of Pax genes in the development of tissues and organs: Pax3 and Pax7 regulate muscle progenitor cell functions. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23 645–673. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen G., Qiu C., Zhang Q., Liu B., Cui Q. (2013). Genome-wide analysis of human SNPs at long intergenic noncoding RNAs. Hum. Mutat. 34 338–344. 10.1002/humu.22239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen X. F., Zhu D. L., Yang M., Hu W. X., Duan Y. Y., Lu B. J., et al. (2018). An Osteoporosis Risk SNP at 1p36.12 Acts as an Allele-Specific Enhancer to Modulate LINC00339 Expression via Long-Range Loop Formation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 102 776–793. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dey B. K., Pfeifer K., Dutta A. (2014). The H19 long noncoding RNA gives rise to microRNAs miR-675-3p and miR-675-5p to promote skeletal muscle differentiation and regeneration. Genes Dev. 28 491–501. 10.1101/gad.234419.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Du M., Zheng R., Ma G., Chu H., Lu J., Li S., et al. (2020). Remote modulation of lncRNA GCLET by risk variant at 16p13 underlying genetic susceptibility to gastric cancer. Sci. Adv. 6:eaay5525. 10.1126/sciadv.aay5525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fattahi Dolatabadi N., Dehghani A., Shahand E., Yazdanshenas M., Tabatabaeian H., Zamani A., et al. (2020). The interaction between MALAT1 target, miR-143-3p, and RALGAPA2 is affected by functional SNP rs3827693 in breast cancer. Hum. Cell 33 1229–1239. 10.1007/s13577-020-00422-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feng T., Feng N., Zhu T., Li Q., Zhang Q., Wang Y., et al. (2020). A SNP-mediated lncRNA (LOC146880) and microRNA (miR-539-5p) interaction and its potential impact on the NSCLC risk. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 39:157. 10.1186/s13046-020-01652-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frazer K. A., Ballinger D. G., Cox D. R., Hinds D. A., Stuve L. L., Gibbs R. A., et al. (2007). A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature 449 851–861. 10.1038/nature06258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fu Y., Zhang Y., Cui J., Yang G., Peng S., Mi W., et al. (2020). SNP rs12982687 affects binding capacity of lncRNA UCA1 with miR-873-5p: involvement in smoking-triggered colorectal cancer progression. Cell Commun. Signal. 18:37. 10.1186/s12964-020-0518-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ge G., Yang D., Tan Y., Chen Y., Jiang D., Jiang A., et al. (2019). miR-10b-5p Regulates C2C12 Myoblasts Proliferation and Differentiation. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 83 291–299. 10.1080/09168451.2018.1533805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gonzalez-Moro I., Olazagoitia-Garmendia A., Colli M. L., Cobo-Vuilleumier N., Postler T. S., Marselli L., et al. (2020). The T1D-associated lncRNA Lnc13 modulates human pancreatic β cell inflammation by allele-specific stabilization of STAT1 mRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117 9022–9031. 10.1073/pnas.1914353117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo H., Ahmed M., Zhang F., Yao C. Q., Li S., Liang Y., et al. (2016). Modulation of long noncoding RNAs by risk SNPs underlying genetic predispositions to prostate cancer. Nat. Genet. 48 1142–1150. 10.1038/ng.3637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guo L., Cui H., Zhao G., Liu R., Li Q., Zheng M., et al. (2018). Intramuscular preadipocytes impede differentiation and promote lipid deposition of muscle satellite cells in chickens. BMC Genomics 19:838. 10.1186/s12864-018-5209-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Han S., Cui C., Wang Y., He H., Shen X., Chen Y., et al. (2019). FHL3 negatively regulates the differentiation of skeletal muscle satellite cells in chicken. 3 Biotech 9:206. 10.1007/s13205-019-1735-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hindi S. M., Shin J., Gallot Y. S., Straughn A. R., Simionescu-Bankston A., Hindi L., et al. (2017). MyD88 promotes myoblast fusion in a cell-autonomous manner. Nat. Commun. 8:1624. 10.1038/s41467-017-01866-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hua J. T., Ahmed M., Guo H., Zhang Y., Chen S., Soares F., et al. (2018). Risk SNP-Mediated Promoter-Enhancer Switching Drives Prostate Cancer through lncRNA PCAT19. Cell 174 564–575.e18. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Koning M., Werker P. M., van Luyn M. J., Krenning G., Harmsen M. C. (2012). A global downregulation of microRNAs occurs in human quiescent satellite cells during myogenesis. Differentiation 84 314–321. 10.1016/j.diff.2012.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kulkarni S., Lied A., Kulkarni V., Rucevic M., Martin M. P., Walker-Sperling V., et al. (2019). CCR5AS lncRNA variation differentially regulates CCR5, influencing HIV disease outcome. Nat. Immunol. 20 824–834. 10.1038/s41590-019-0406-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li Y., Zhang F., Yang D. (2017). Comprehensive assessment and meta-analysis of the association between CTNNB1 polymorphisms and cancer risk. Biosci. Rep. 37:BSR20171121. 10.1042/BSR20171121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Livak K. J., Schmittgen T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lv W., Jin J., Xu Z., Luo H., Guo Y., Wang X., et al. (2020). lncMGPF is a novel positive regulator of muscle growth and regeneration. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 11 1723–1746. 10.1002/jcsm.12623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McLaren P. J., Coulonges C., Bartha I., Lenz T. L., Deutsch A. J., Bashirova A., et al. (2015). Polymorphisms of large effect explain the majority of the host genetic contribution to variation of HIV-1 virus load. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 14658–14663. 10.1073/pnas.1514867112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Minotti L., Agnoletto C., Baldassari F., Corra F., Volinia S. (2018). SNPs and somatic mutation on long non-coding RNA: new frontier in the cancer studies? High Throughput 7:34. 10.3390/ht7040034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nie Y., Cai S., Yuan R., Ding S., Zhang X., Chen L., et al. (2020). Zfp422 promotes skeletal muscle differentiation by regulating EphA7 to induce appropriate myoblast apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 27 1644–1659. 10.1038/s41418-019-0448-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Quinn J. J., Chang H. Y. (2016). Unique features of long non-coding RNA biogenesis and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17 47–62. 10.1038/nrg.2015.10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ren T., Zhou Y., Zhou Y., Tian W., Gu Z., Zhao S., et al. (2017). Identification and association of novel lncRNA pouMU1 gene mutations with chicken performance traits. J. Genet. 96 941–950. 10.1007/s12041-017-0858-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tajbakhsh S. (2009). Skeletal muscle stem cells in developmental versus regenerative myogenesis. J. Intern. Med. 266 372–389. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02158.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Xu C., Liu M., Jia D., Tao T., Hao D. (2021). lncRNA TINCR SNPs and Expression Levels Are Associated with Bladder Cancer Susceptibility. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers 25 31–41. 10.1089/gtmb.2020.0178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yang R., Liu Y., Cheng Y., Wang C., Song J., Lu G., et al. (2021). Effects and Molecular Mechanism of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms of MEG3 on Porcine Skeletal Muscle Development. Front. Genet. 12:607910. 10.3389/fgene.2021.607910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yue F., Bi P., Wang C., Li J., Liu X., Kuang S. (2016). Conditional Loss of Pten in Myogenic Progenitors Leads to Postnatal Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy but Age-Dependent Exhaustion of Satellite Cells. Cell Rep. 17 2340–2353. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang X., Wang W., Zhu W., Dong J., Cheng Y., Yin Z., et al. (2019). Mechanisms and Functions of Long Non-Coding RNAs at Multiple Regulatory Levels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20:5573. 10.3390/ijms20225573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang Y., Li W., Zhu M., Li Y., Xu Z., Zuo B. (2016). FHL3 differentially regulates the expression of MyHC isoforms through interactions with MyoD and pCREB. Cell. Signal. 28 60–73. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang Z. K., Li J., Guan D., Liang C., Zhuo Z., Liu J., et al. (2018). A newly identified lncRNA MAR1 acts as a miR-487b sponge to promote skeletal muscle differentiation and regeneration. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 9 613–626. 10.1002/jcsm.12281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zheng H., Zhao X., Wang H., Ding Y., Lu X., Zhang G., et al. (2020). Location deviations of DNA functional elements affected SNP mapping in the published databases and references. Brief. Bioinform. 21 1293–1301. 10.1093/bib/bbz073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhou R., Wang Y. X., Long K. R., Jiang A. A., Jin L. (2018). [Regulatory mechanism for lncRNAs in skeletal muscle development and progress on its research in domestic animals]. Yi Chuan 40 292–304. 10.16288/j.yczz.17-358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhu M., Liu J., Xiao J., Yang L., Cai M., Shen H., et al. (2017). Lnc-mg is a long non-coding RNA that promotes myogenesis. Nat. Commun. 8:14718. 10.1038/ncomms14718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data_Sheet_1.XLS (208.5KB, XLS)
Data_Sheet_2.doc (60.5KB, doc)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES