ABSTRACT
Plant tissues naturally senesce over time. Attempts to improve plant robustness and increase longevity have involved genetic modification, application of synthetic chemicals, and use of beneficial microbes. Recently, culture supernatant from a microalga Chlorella fusca was found to prime innate immunity against Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis thaliana. However, the capacity of Chlorella culture supernatants to prevent or delay aging in higher plants has not been elucidated. In this study, roots of the ornamental flowering plant Erinus alpinus L. were drenched with cell-free supernatants from three Chlorella species. Flower and leaf senescence in E. alpinus was significantly reduced and delayed with all three Chlorella supernatants. Investigations of the mode of action underlying delayed senescence showed that the Chlorella supernatants did not act as a chemical trigger to elicit plant immunity or as a growth-promoting fertilizer in E. alpinus. The mechanisms underlying the anti-aging effects remain undetermined, and several possible hypotheses are discussed. Several Chlorella species are industrially cultivated, and disposal of cell-free supernatant can be economically and environmentally challenging. This study provides a novel method for extending plant lifespan through use of Chlorella supernatant and discusses the potential of using industrial waste supernatants in agriculture and horticulture to reduce reliance on chemical pesticides and genetic modification.
KEYWORDS: Chlorella supernatant, ornamental flowering plant, plant senescence, PGPR, plant anti-aging, Erinus alpinus L
Introduction
The ability to prolong plant development and delay age-related phenotypes such as grain maturation in cereals and flower turnover in ornamental plants is economically important in crop science and critical in fundamental plant research.1,2 Previous research showed that senescence of plant tissues and organs was a key indicator of plant aging.1,2 Recent studies focused on leaf and flower senescence due to their importance in influencing yield and nutritional value in agricultural crops.3,4 Several studies have examined the molecular basis of senescence with the aim of understanding the mechanisms governing crop senescence and using the findings to improve crop yield and biomass.1,4 Plant hormones such as cytokinin, ethylene, and abscisic acid were shown to play important roles in plant senescence through their responses to various environmental factors.1 Knowledge regarding the molecular underpinnings of plant senescence have facilitated attempts to manipulate senescence in crop plants through genetic engineering approaches.5 However, many jurisdictions prohibit the widespread release of genetically modified plants, leading researchers to employ alternative approaches for modulation of plant aging.
Application of synthetic chemicals to alter plant aging is one alternative to genetic modification. For example, the phytohormone ethylene is a known facilitator of senescence. Ethylene production inhibitors such as naphthaleneacetic acid, 1-methylcyclopropene, silver thiosulfate, cyclic olefin norbornadiene, and L-a-(aminoethoxyvinyl)-glycine were effective in delaying leaf and flower senescence.6–10 Similarly, application of a synthetic auxin derivative, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, delayed senescence-related fruit drop in Citrus species.11 Finally, flower senescence was delayed after application of the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide.2,3 Nevertheless, synthetic chemical inhibitors of plant senescence can have undesirable side effects such as damage to plants, human toxicity, and environmental damage.7,8 One alternative approach is to use beneficial microbes rather than potentially harmful chemical inhibitors to help delay plant senescence.12–16
Several beneficial bacteria were previously shown to modulate a plant senescence-related phytohormone ethylene production in plants.13,15 The endophytic Pseudomonas species P. putida GR12–2, P. fluorescens YsS6, and P. migulae 8R6 were found to produce 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase, which degraded the ethylene precursor ACC into ammonia and a-ketobutyrate and thus delayed flower senescence through reducing endogenous ethylene contents.12,13,17 Treatment with Enterobacter cloacae also delayed flower senescence via a reduction in ethylene production, in this case due to a decrease in ethylene biosynthesis gene expression.15 The plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus pumilus S1r1 delayed foliar senescence in maize via enhancement of nitrogen fixation.16 Finally, inoculation with Pseudomonas fulva and Escherichia coli K12 significantly prolonged flower duration in Zinnia elegans.14 Taken together several beneficial microbes and their metabolites were shown to be effective in delaying senescence in small-scale greenhouse trials via decreases in plant hormone production. However, microalgae-mediated delayed senescence of plant has not been reported.
Erinus alpinus L., commonly known as ‘Alpine-Liver balsam’ in USA and Europe and ‘Fairy Star’ in Korea, is a an ornamental plant species in the Plantaginaceae family.18,19 Because E. alpinus L. has a short lifespan, delaying leaf and flower senescence is highly desirable for both growers and consumers. The objective of this study was to develop methods to delay plant aging, and hence reduce leaf and flower senescence in E. alpinus. To address this, E. alpinus was treated with cell-free supernatant from three Chlorella species to determine whether this treatment would delay aging. In this study, we evaluated effect of three Chlorella spp. including Chlorella fusca CHK0059, Chlorella sp. ABC001, and Chlorella sp. HS2 on delaying plant aging. C. fusca CHK0059 was previously shown to elicit plant innate immune responses against P. syrinage pv. tomato in Arabidopsis thaliana.20 Chlorella spp. ABC001 and HS2 were not previously applied to higher plants but demonstrated high efficiency growth characteristics suitable for biofuel production.21–25 Root-drenching of three Chlorella supernatant significantly delayed flower and leaf senescence of E. alpinus through different function immunity-eliciting chemical or fertilizer. This is the first report of the novel plant anti-aging strategy using cell-free supernatant of microalgae Chlorella.
Materials and methods
Preparation of Chlorella supernatant and E. alpinus plant
C. fusca strain CHK0059 was obtained from Dr. Chang-Ki Shim at the Rural Development Administration, Wanju, South Korea, and Chlorella spp. ABC001 and HS2 were obtained from Prof. Yong-Keun Chang at the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, South Korea. Three Chlorella species were cultivated under mixotrophic condition as described previously.20 Supernatants were harvested from 107 cells/ml mixotrophic Chlorella cultures using centrifugation at 4000 × g for 10 min. To avoid contamination with Chlorella and bacterial cells, the supernatant of three Chlorella species were filtered using a 0.45 µm syringe filter (Figure 1a).
Figure 1.

Procedures of the plant anti-aging experiment with Chlorella cell-free supernatant.
E. alpinus L. planted in flower pots (diameter 110 mm, height 100 mm) was obtained from a commercial grower (Nakwon Garden Shop, Daejeon, South Korea). E. alpinus was placed in the KRIBB greenhouse facility in Daejeon, South Korea. The temperature in greenhouse was controlled at 20–22°C. For the quality control of flower plant, before the treatment of Chlorella supernatant, E. alpinus was adapted to KRIBB greenhouse conditions for a week.
Treatment of Chlorella supernatant
To examine delaying senescence by Chlorella supernatant, E. alpinus higher than 20 cm-long were selected. The roots of E. alpinus were drenched with 20 ml of filtrated supernatant, 0.5 mM BTH, and BG11 broth medium with 1 g/L glucose, and 1 g/pot Osmocote® fertilizer (ICL Specialty Fertilizers; nitrogen 10%, phosphorus pentoxide 5%, potassium oxide 20%, magnesium oxide 2%, calcium oxide 2.5%, iron 0.35%, manganese 0.07%, copper 0.01%, zinc 0.03%, boron 0.01%, and molybdenum 0.009%). The filtrated supernatant, 0.5 mM BTH, and BG11 broth medium were treated 5 times (every five days) for 25 days. The solid Osmocote® fertilizer was not treated five times but one time at 1st application of other treatments (Figure 1a).
Measurement of plant senescence
Aboveground senescence of E. alpinus was assessed for 10 weeks after 5th treatment. Plants exhibiting withered leaves and flowers in more than 80% of shoots were defined as senescent and the overall percentage of senescent plants was determined. The 12 plants for a treatment were measured the ‘percentage of senescent plant (%)’. The treatments were randomly arranged among blocks with three replications. The experiment was performed three times.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed by analysis of variance using JMP 4.0 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Significant treatment effects were determined on the basis of the magnitude of the F-value (p < .05). When a significant F-value was obtained, the separation of means was analyzed by determination of Fisher’s protected least significant difference at p < .05.
Results
Delaying plant senescence by cell-free Chlorella supernatant
To examine delayed plant senescence by Chlorella supernatant, 20 mL supernatant was drench-applied to the root systems of E. alpinus plants (Figure 1). Supernatants from three Chlorella strains were used. The overall percentage of senescent plants was determined weekly for 10 weeks after treatment with Chlorella spp. supernatants (Figures 2a–b). Treatment of E. alpinus plants with supernatant from C. fusca CHK0059 delayed senescence onset by two weeks and significantly reduced the percentage of senescent plants by 8.2- and 5.0-fold at 6 and 7 weeks after 5th treatment, respectively, compared to plants treated with culture medium only. The percentage of senescent plants was also lower 8 weeks after treatment, but this was not statistically significant (Figures 2a–b). Treatment with supernatants from Chlorella spp. ABC001 and HS2 delayed the onset of foliar senescence in E. alpinus by an additional two weeks compared to C. fusca CHK0059 supernatant (Figures 2a–b). Treatment with supernatants from Chlorella spp. ABC001 and HS2 reduced the percentage of E. alpinus plants that were senescent to below 10% until 8 weeks after treatment. E. alpinus senescence was significantly lower than in the medium-only control, even after 9 weeks, with senescence percentages 5.9- and 4.7-fold lower for Chlorella spp. ABC001 and HS2 supernatants, respectively (Figures 2a–b). The lowest E. alpinus senescence rate was detected with supernatant from Chlorella HS2, with the percentage of senescent plants remaining below 20% for the full 10 weeks trial period (Figure 2b). These results indicated that root-drenching of three Chlorella supernatants delayed plant senescence in E. alpinus.
Figure 2.

Senescence of E. alpinus aboveground after root treatment with Chlorella cell-free supernatant.
Elucidating mode of action underlying delayed senescence by Chlorella supernatant
Treatment with C. fusca CHK0059 was previously shown to enhance plant growth and immunity via modulation of stress hormone signaling, including salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene signaling.20,26,27 In particular, modulation of stress hormones by plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria led to delayed plant senescence.12,13,16,17 Therefore, we hypothesized that Chlorella supernatants delayed senescence by regulating plant growth promotion or plant immunity via modulation of hormone signaling. To examine this hypothesis, E. alpinus root systems were treated with 0.5 mM benzothiadiazole (BTH) or fertilizer. BTH, a synthetic plant immune trigger, was previously reported to affect leaf and flower senescence during constant activation of plant immunity.28,29 Fertilizer as a plant growth stimulant was applied to assess the effect of plant growth promotion on plant senescence. Roots were treated with 0.5 mM BTH or with 1 g Osmocote® fertilizer per plant pot (Figures 2c–d). Compared with treatment with BG11 medium alone, neither BTH treatment nor fertilizer application significantly altered senescence of E. alpinus during the 10 weeks trial period (Figures 2c–d). Thus, constant activation of plant immunity and growth stimulation with nutrient supply did not affect senescence in E. alpinus, suggesting that the delayed leaf and flower senescence observed in plants treated with Chlorella supernatant was caused by the two known mechanisms on higher plant such as growth promotion and plant immunity activation.
Discussion
Our results describe a novel strategy for delaying flower and leaf senescence using Chlorella culture supernatants. At present, industrial Chlorella growth is aimed at cell production, with culture supernatants discarded. Large amounts of supernatant can be produced during Chlorella cultivation, and disposal can be expensive and damaging to the environment.20 Agricultural application of waste Chlorella supernatants may address the economic and environmental concerns while providing plant growth benefits. Supernatant from the high-lipid producing strain Chlorella sp. HS2 was most effective in delaying senescence (Figure 2b). Chlorella sp. HS2 is industrially grown in outdoor cultivation systems for the production of biofuel, and supernatant for agricultural use could be produced simultaneously.20,25 Cell-free supernatants from Chlorella spp. cultivation could be easily applied alongside fertilizer or water in agriculture and horticulture using watering technologies such as drip-irrigation systems or sprinkler systems. However, we did not provide clear evidence of mode of action for anti-aging effect on flower and leaf of E. alpinus. Four hypotheses are proposed to explain the delayed senescence observed when Chlorella supernatants were applied to E. alpinus roots.
First, Chlorella supernatant might activate or prime antioxidant enzyme expression, leading to a reduction in reactive oxygen species (ROS) in E. alpinus. ROS act as internal triggers and signal molecules during plant senescence, and their breakdown can be catalyzed by antioxidant enzymes.1, 30 C. fusca and its potential determinants were previously shown to activate antioxidant enzyme activity. Root drenching with C. fusca culture medium increased the activity of the antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) in soybean sprouts.26 In addition, our previous research showed that C. fusca CHK0059-derived D-lactic acid primed the expression of two antioxidant enzyme genes, alternative oxidase 1 (AOX1) and cytochrome C oxidase subunit 2 (COX2), after flagellin 22 (flg22) treatment in Arabidopsis leaves.20 D-lactic acid antioxidant enzyme priming may be activated more strongly in response to flg22-triggered ROS production.20 This suggests that root drenching of E. alpinus with Chlorella supernatants might delay senescence by stimulating antioxidant enzymes and reducing the abundance of ROS.
Second, delayed senescence in E. alpinus may be linked to antioxidant compounds produced by Chlorella spp. rather than by E. alpinus. Of the three Chlorella supernatants tested, supernatant from Chlorella sp. HS2 was most effective in delaying plant aging over the full 10 week trial period (Figure 2b). Chlorella spp. ABC001 and HS2 were previously found to be highly efficient strains for the production of beneficial compounds such as specific lipids and antioxidant pigments.21–25,31 Especially, Chlorella sp. HS2 accumulated high levels of the antioxidant pigments β-carotenoid and lutein.25,31 The antioxidant pigments produced by Chlorella sp. HS2 may reduce ROS levels during senescence in E. alpinus.
Third, activation of D-lactate dehydrogenase (D-LDH) in E. alpinus by D-lactic acid produced by Chlorella spp. could affect senescence of E. alpinus. D-lactic acid secreted by C. fusca CHK0059 was previously shown to activate expression of D-LDH upon flg22 treatment in Arabidopsis.20 In plants, D-LDH is involved in the detoxification of methylglyoxal (MG), a cytotoxic compound generated as a byproduct of glycolysis.32 MG can trigger abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms and can promote aging.33 The end product of MG detoxification is D-lactate, which is oxidized by D-LDH.32 Loss-of function D-LDH mutants in Arabidopsis exhibited hypersensitivity to treatment with exogenous MG,34 demonstrating that D-LDH activation played an important role in reducing MG levels. Although similar mechanisms were not tested in E. alpinus, it is possible that treatment of E. alpinus with Chlorella supernatant may reduce MG levels during senescence via activation of D-LDH and MG detoxification.
Fourth, the role of Chlorella-derived plant hormone mimics cannot be excluded. Chlorella species can produce auxin and cytokinin-like molecules that were previously linked to leaf senescence.35,36 Our previous research did not find phytohormones in C. fusca supernatant,20 but evaluation of phytohormone levels in supernatants of Chlorella sp. ABC001 and HS2 is required.
Our study confirms that Chlorella culture supernatants contain anti-aging components that can delay leaf and flower senescence and proposes that supernatants could be retrieved from existing large-scale Chlorella cultivation systems and reused in agricultural field. This would provide the dual benefit of reducing the environmental and economic costs of Chlorella production waste while providing a longevity benefit when applied to the root systems of agricultural and horticultural plants. Improving plant robustness by application of Chlorella supernatants could also potentially reduce reliance on chemical pesticides and genetically modified plants, reducing environmental damage at the whole-ecosystem level.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by grants from the Advanced Biomass R&D Center (ABC) of the Global Frontier Project funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT and Future Planning (ABC-2010-0029728), the cooperative Research Program for Agriculture and Technology Development (Agenda Project No. PJ011707), Rural Development Administration, and KRIBB Initiative Program, South Korea.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the grants from the Advanced Biomass R&D Center (ABC) of the Global Frontier Project funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT and Future Planning [ABC-2010-0029728], the cooperative Research Program for Agriculture andTechnology Development [Agenda Project No. PJ011707], and KRIBB Initiative Program, South Korea.
Disclosure statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
References
- 1.Lim PO, Kim HJ, Gil Nam H.. Leaf senescence. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58(1):1–6. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shahri W, Tahir I.. Flower senescence: some molecular aspects. Planta. 2014;239(2):277–297. doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-1984-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shibuya K, Ichimura K.. Physiology and molecular biology of flower senescence. Postharvest ripening physiology of crops. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016. p. 109–125. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Woo HR, Masclaux-Daubresse C, Lim PO. Plant senescence: how plants know when and how to die.J Exp Bot. 2018;69(4):715–718. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yadava P, Singh A, Kumar K, Singh I. Plant senescence and agriculture. Senescence signalling and control in plants. Academic Press; 2019. p.283–302. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813187-9.00018-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Veen H, Van de Geijn S. Mobility and ionic form of silver as related to longevity of cut carnations. Planta. 1978;140(1):93–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00389386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Reid MS, Wu MJ. Ethylene and flower senescence. Plant Growth Regul. 1992;11(1):37–43. doi: 10.1007/BF00024431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Staby GL, Basel RM, Reid MS, Dodge LL. Efficacies of commercial anti-ethylene products for fresh cut flowers. Horttechnology. 1993;3(2):199–202. doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH.3.2.199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Van Doorn W. Categories of petal senescence and abscission: a re-evaluation. Ann Bot. 2001;87(4):447–456. doi: 10.1006/anbo.2000.1357. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yuan R, Carbaugh DH. Effects of NAA, AVG, and 1-MCP on ethylene biosynthesis, preharvest fruit drop, fruit maturity, and quality of ‘Golden supreme’and ‘Golden delicious’ apples. HortScience. 2007;42(1):101–105. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.42.1.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Anthony MF, Coggins JCW. The efficacy of five forms of 2, 4-D in controlling preharvest fruit drop in citrus. Sci Hortic. 1999;81(3):267–277. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(99)00015-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nayani S, Mayak S, Glick BR. Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on senescence of flower petals. Indian J Exp Biol. 1998;36:836–839. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ali S, Charles T, Glick B. Delay of flower senescence by bacterial endophytes expressing 1‐aminocyclopropane‐1‐carboxylate deaminase. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113(5):1139–1144. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05409.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Carlson AS, Dole JM, Matthysse AG, Hoffmann WA, Kornegay JL. Bacteria species and solution pH effect postharvest quality of cut Zinnia elegans. Sci Hortic. 2015;194:71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Naing AH, Win NM, Han JS, Lim KB, Kim CK. Role of nano-silver and the bacterial strain Enterobacter cloacae in increasing vase life of cut carnation ‘Omea’. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1590. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kuan KB, Othman R, Rahim KA, Shamsuddin ZH. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation to enhance vegetative growth, nitrogen fixation and nitrogen remobilisation of maize under greenhouse conditions. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0152478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gamalero E, Glick BR. Bacterial modulation of plant ethylene levels. Plant Physiol. 2015;169(1):13–22. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Laurie A, Ries V, Chadwick LC, Poesch G. Flower growing. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin. 1933.p 1-49. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fletcher R, Stace C. A new section and species of Festuca (Poaceae) naturalized in England. Watsonia. 2000;23:173–178. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee SM, Kim SK, Lee N, Ahn CY, Ryu CM. D‐Lactic acid secreted by Chlorella fusca primes pattern‐triggered immunity against Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2020. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sung KD, Lee JS, Shin CS, Park SC, Choi MJ. CO2 fixation by Chlorella sp. KR-1 and its cultural characteristics. Bioresour Technol. 1999;68(3):269–273. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00152-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jin M, Oh YK, Chang YK, Choi M. Optimum utilization of biochemical components in Chlorella sp. KR1 via subcritical hydrothermal liquefaction. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2017;5(8):7240–7248. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim HS, Park WK, Lee B, Seon G, Suh WI, Moon M, Seon G, Suh WI, Moon M, Suh WI, et al. Optimization of heterotrophic cultivation of Chlorella sp. HS2 using screening, statistical assessment, and validation. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55854-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nayak M, Suh WI, Chang YK, Lee B. Exploration of two-stage cultivation strategies using nitrogen starvation to maximize the lipid productivity in Chlorella sp. HS2. Bioresour Technol. 2019;276:110–118. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yun JH, Cho DH, Heo J, Lee YJ, Lee B, Chang YK, Kim HS.. Evaluation of the potential of Chlorella sp. HS2, an algal isolate from a tidal rock pool, as an industrial algal crop under a wide range of abiotic conditions. J Appl Phycol. 2019;31(4):2245–2258. doi: 10.1007/s10811-019-1751-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kim MJ, Shim CK, Kim YK, Hong SJ, Park JH, Han EJ, Jee, H.J., Lee, S.B. and Kim, S.C. Effect of Chlorella sp. on improving antioxidant activities and growth promotion in organic soybean sprout cultivation. Korean J Org Agric. 2015;23(4):939–950. doi: 10.11625/KJOA.2015.23.4.939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kim MJ, Shim CK, Kim YK, Ko BG, Park JH, Hwang SG, and Kim, B.H. Effect of biostimulator Chlorella fusca on improving growth and qualities of chinese chives and spinach in organic farm. Plant Pathol J. 2018;34:567. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.FT.11.2018.0254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Friedrich L, Lawton K, Ruess W, Masner P, Specker N, Rella MG, Meier B, Dincher S, Staub T, Uknes S, Métraux JP. A benzothiadiazole derivative induces systemic acquired resistance in tobacco. Plant J. 1996;10(1):61–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10010061.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lawton KA, Friedrich L, Hunt M, Weymann K, Delaney T, Kessmann H, Staub T, Ryals J. Benzothiadiazole induces disease resistance in Arabidopsis by activation of the systemic acquired resistance signal transduction pathway. Plant J. 1996;10(1):71–82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1996.10010071.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Woo HR, Kim HJ, Nam HG, Lim PO. Plant leaf senescence and death–regulation by multiple layers of control and implications for aging in general. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(21):4823–4833. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yun JH, Pierrelée M, Cho DH, Kim U, Heo J, Choi DY, Lee, Y.J., Lee, B., Kim, H., Habermann, B. and Chang, Y.K. Transcriptomic responses associated with carbon and energy flows under high salinity stress suggest the overflow of acetyl-CoA from glycolysis and NADPH co-factor induces high lipid accumulation and halotolerance in Chlorella sp. HS2. bioRxiv. 2019;817551. doi: 10.1101/817551. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Maurino VG, Engqvist MK. 2-Hydroxy acids in plant metabolism. The Arabidopsis book/American Society of Plant Biologists. 2015;13. doi: 10.1199/tab.0182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kaur C, Kushwaha HR, Mustafiz A, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL. Analysis of global gene expression profile of rice in response to methylglyoxal indicates its possible role as a stress signal molecule. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:682. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Engqvist M, Drincovich MF, Flügge U-I, Maurino VG. Two d-2-Hydroxy-acid Dehydrogenases in Arabidopsis thaliana with Catalytic capacities to participate in the last reactions of the Methylglyoxal and β-Oxidation pathways. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(37):25026–25037. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.021253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stirk WA, van Staden J, Novák O, Doležal K, Strnad M, Dobrev PI, Sipos G, Ördög V, Bálint P. Changes in endogenous cytokinin concentrations in Chlorella (Chlorophycease) in relation to light and the cell cylcle1. J Phycol. 2011;47(2):291–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Khasin M, Cahoon RR, Nickerson KW, Riekhof WR. Molecular machinery of auxin synthesis, secretion, and perception in the unicellular chlorophyte alga Chlorella sorokiniana UTEX 1230. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0205227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
