Abstract
Epidermal inclusion cyst is a relatively common benign lesion of the skin, and it can occur anywhere in the hair-bearing area of the body. It usually appears as an asymptomatic mass, which is less than 4 cm in size. However, rarely it can occur as a large mass in the axilla, and in such cases, the location and size tend to cause more complications. The author encountered a patient with a large epidermal inclusion cyst of the axilla. Ultrasound examination showed an oval-shaped hypoechoic subcutaneous mass with dermal attachment, intralesional echogenic reflectors, filiform anechoic areas, and no vascularity. These characteristic imaging features could lead to an accurate preoperative imaging diagnosis without biopsy and avoid subsequent complications. Excision of the mass was performed due to discomfort because of the large size and growing nature of the lesion, and histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of an epidermal inclusion cyst. Therefore, recognition of diagnostic ultrasound features of this entity may enable an accurate preoperative diagnosis, even when it has an unusual size and location.
Keywords: Giant epidermal inclusion cyst, Axilla, Ultrasound Imaging
Introduction
Epidermal inclusion cysts (EICs) are common benign cutaneous cysts, which are lined with stratified squamous epithelium and contain keratinous debris, cholesterol, or sebaceous materials [1,2]. Although they can occur anywhere in the hair-bearing area of the body, they most commonly involve the scalp, face, neck, trunk, and back. Less than 10% of these lesions occur in the extremities. They usually appear as asymptomatic dermal or subdermal lumps, which are less than 4 cm in diameter and grow slowly without medical attention or treatment. However, if an EIC is more than 5 cm in maximal diameter, it is considered a giant epidermal inclusion cyst, which can cause the patient discomfort, and requires surgical excision as it does not regress with medical treatment alone [3,4]. Preoperative diagnosis is important for deciding or planning further treatment or management, and imaging-guided biopsy may be required for this purpose. However, iatrogenic rupture during biopsy, just like spontaneous rupture, may release non-absorbable keratin materials from the cyst, which can irritate the surrounding tissues and cause secondary foreign body reaction, granulomatous reaction, or abscess formation [4]. Therefore, if the typical imaging findings of EICs could be identified, it may help in making a preoperative imaging diagnosis without performing a biopsy even if the cyst has an unusual size or location, thereby preventing subsequent complications such as rupture and inflammation. The author encountered a male patient with a large EIC in the axilla, and the characteristic ultrasound features led to an accurate preoperative diagnosis in this patient.
Case report
A 43-year-old man presented with a palpable mass in the left axilla, which had been growing for the past two years. He had a medical history of coil embolization and clipping for a brain aneurysm and was taking anticoagulant medication. Physical examination revealed a large, soft, and non-tender mass in the posterior axillary fossa. There was no erythema or bruising. Laboratory test results were within the normal range. The referring physician's clinical impression was lipoma. Mammography showed a circumscribed mass in the subcutaneous fat layer of the axillary fossa (Fig. 1). On gray-scale ultrasound, the mass was located in the subcutaneous fat layer with dermal attachment and demonstrated a circumscribed margin, ovoid shape with homogeneously hypoechoic echogenicity, intralesional filiform anechoic areas, and echogenic reflectors (Fig. 2A). There was no intra- or perilesional vascularity on color Doppler evaluation (Fig. 2B). These findings were suggestive of an EIC. Because of the characteristic imaging findings, and concerns about the complications that may arise in case of a rupture, preoperative tissue confirmation was not performed. The patient underwent local excision of the lesion because of the discomfort due to its large size and growing nature. Histopathological examination of the excised mass revealed a smooth-walled cyst, which was lined with squamous epithelium and filled with keratin. The lining epithelium had a granular layer with absence of significant nuclear atypia. Consequently, the diagnosis of EIC was confirmed (Fig. 3).
Fig. 1.
Axillary mammography view shows a circumscribed mass in the subcutaneous fat layer of the axillary fossa
Fig. 2.
A & B. Ultrasound shows a circumscribed, ovoid shaped, subdermal mass with intralesional filiform anechoic areas (open arrows), echogenic reflectors (arrowheads), and dermal attachment (small arrows) (A). On color Doppler study, no intralesional blood flow can be seen (B)
Fig. 3.
A & B. Histopathologic examination shows that the cyst is lined by squamous epithelium and contains keratin (hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification × 40) (A). The lining epithelium shows a granular layer along with absence of significant nuclear atypia (hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification × 400) (B)
Discussion
EICs, also known as epidermal cysts, epidermoid cysts, sebaceous cysts, or infundibular cysts, are benign cystic lesions, which are characterized by the proliferation of epithelial cells locally in the dermal or subcutaneous tissue, leading to the formation of a keratin-filled cyst [1,2]. They may result from the obstruction of a pilosebaceous follicle, migration of epithelial cells during embryogenesis, or acquired reasons such as trauma or surgery [3], [4], [5]. Clinically, they appear as solitary slowly growing lumps with sizes ranging from a few millimeters to a few centimeters, with or without a central characteristic punctum. Multiple EICs can occur in patients with Gardner syndrome, which is also associated with intestinal polyposis, osteomas, and thyroid nodules [1], [2], [3]. Giant EICs, more than 5 cm in diameter, have been described in previous case reports along with clinical and imaging findings [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. However, occurrence of a giant EIC in the axilla, as in the present case, has not been reported in the imaging literature.
Ultrasound is considered as the first-line modality for the evaluation of superficial soft tissue masses, including those in the skin because of its detailed resolution, lack of radiation, cost-effectiveness, and easy availability compared to other modalities such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [9]. In the evaluation of palpable lesions in the axilla, ultrasound can detect and localize the lesion, as well as differentiate lymph nodes or soft tissue masses that may require preoperative tissue confirmation. However, if there are characteristic or distinctive findings on ultrasound imaging, an appropriate sonographic diagnosis can be made without performing a biopsy and may avoid further unnecessary examination [10]. According to previous studies [1,2,8,11,12], the characteristic sonographic features of an unruptured EIC can be summarized as an oval shape, clear demarcation, and subcutaneous location with dermal attachment. Echogenicity varies depending on the contents, amount, and arrangement of keratin debris or lamellae in a pseudo testis pattern, concentric ring or onion skin appearance, target appearance, or heterogeneous echotexture. Notable specific findings are intralesional bright echogenic reflectors, filiform anechoic areas (disorganized or peripherally clumped) that are pathologically correlated with the keratin and cholesterol contents, and absence of intralesional vascularity on a color Doppler study even in the case of large lesions. Tract-to-skin or submarine signs might be related to the punctum on the skin of an EIC [9,13].
The known complications of EICs are rupture, inflammatory changes, or abscess formation, which can make an accurate imaging diagnosis difficult due to a lobulated or irregular shape, poorly defined margin, and increased intra-/perilesional vascularity [9,10]. Rarely, malignant degeneration or squamous cell carcinoma development within the EIC wall have been reported in approximately 2% cases, and solid nodules associated with the cyst wall should raise the suspicion of malignant degeneration [8]. In the axillary area, a ruptured EIC was reported to cause axillary web syndrome in a previous case report [14]. Small asymptomatic EICs do not require treatment, but for a symptomatic giant EIC, complete excision of the cyst and its contents is the treatment of choice. Incomplete removal of the cyst can lead to chronic inflammation and recurrence.
In conclusion, an EIC can occur in the axilla as a palpable mass, and recognition of its diagnostic ultrasound features can lead to an accurate preoperative diagnosis even when the EIC has an unusual site and size, thereby preventing subsequent complications such as rupture and inflammation.
Patient Consent
Written informed consent was not necessary because no patient data has been included in the manuscript.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements: None
Competing Interests: None declared.
References
- 1.Huang CC, Ko SF, Huang HY, Ng SH, Lee TY, Lee YW. Epidermal cysts in the superficial soft tissue: Sonographic features with an emphasis on the pseudotestis pattern. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(1):11–17. doi: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee HS, Joo KB, Song HT, Kim YS, Park DW, Park CK. Relationship between sonographic and pathologic findings in epidermal inclusion cysts. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;29(7):374–383. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Houdek MT, Warneke JA, Pollard CM, Lindgren EA, Taljanovic MS. Giant epidermal cyst of the gluteal region. Radiol Case Rep. 2010;5(4):476. doi: 10.2484/rcr.v5i4.476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim HJ, Park WJ, Kim SW, Paik SY. Giant epidermal inclusion cyst in the male breast: a case report. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2017;76(3):206–210. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2017.76.3.206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Patel S, Tsoi KY, Joseph G. Giant epidermal cyst of the arm: A rare presentation. BMJ Case Reports CP. 2018;11(1) doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-227615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mahmud MU, Sheuly SB, Bhuiyan NH, Chowdhury R, Ali R. Giant epidermoid cyst in the breast: A common benign lesion at a rare site—A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;36:130–132. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Park TW, Kim JK, Kim JR. Giant epidermal cyst in the posterior neck developing over 40 years: a case report. Exp Ther Med. 2014;7(1):287–289. doi: 10.3892/etm.2013.1383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pressney I, Khoo M, Hargunani R, Saifuddin A. Description of the MRI and ultrasound imaging features of giant epidermal cysts. Br J Radiol. 2020;93(1114) doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wortsman X. Common applications of dermatologic sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(1):97–111. doi: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.1.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wu S, Tu R, Liu G, Shi Y. Role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of common soft tissue lesions of the limbs. Ultrasound Q. 2013;29(1):67–71. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3182823617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim HK, Kim SM, Lee SH, Racadio JM, Shin MJ. Subcutaneous epidermal inclusion cysts: Ultrasound (US) and MR imaging findings. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(11):1415–1419. doi: 10.1007/s00256-010-1072-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yuan WH, Hsu HC, Lai YC, Chou YH, Li AF. Differences in sonographic features of ruptured and unruptured epidermal cysts. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(2):265–272. doi: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.2.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee DH, Yoon CS, Lim BJ, Lee HS, Kim S, Choi AL. Ultrasound feature-based diagnostic model focusing on the “submarine sign” for epidermal cysts among superficial soft tissue lesions. Korean J Radiol. 2019;20(10):1409–1421. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee KC, Chang YW, Chen CP. Axillary web syndrome following epidermal inclusion cyst: A case report and literature review. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2019;44(1):64–66. doi: 10.1111/ced.13647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



