Skip to main content
Public Health Action logoLink to Public Health Action
. 2021 Nov 1;11(Suppl 1):70–76. doi: 10.5588/pha.21.0044

Low yield but high levels of multidrug resistance in urinary tract infections in a tertiary hospital, Nepal

R Baral 1,, L B Shrestha 1, N Ortuño-Gutiérrez 2, P Pyakure 1,3, B Rai 1, S P Rimal 1, S Singh 1, S K Sharma 1, B Khanal 1, K Selvaraj 4, A M V Kumar 5,6,7
PMCID: PMC8575377  PMID: 34778019

Abstract

SETTING:

There are concerns about the occurrence of multidrug resistance (MDR) in patients with urine tract infections (UTI) in Nepal.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine culture positivity, trends in MDR among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae infections and seasonal changes in culture-positive UTI specimens isolated from 2014 to 2018 at the B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Eastern Nepal.

DESIGN:

This was a cross-sectional study using secondary laboratory data.

RESULTS:

Among 116,417 urine samples tested, 19,671 (16.9%) were culture-positive, with an increasing trend in the number of samples tested and culture positivity. E. coli was the most common bacteria (54.3%), followed by K. pneumoniae (8.8%). Among E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, MDR was found in respectively 42.5% and 36.0%. MDR was higher in males and people aged >55 years, but showed a decreasing trend over the years. The numbers of isolates increased over the years, with a peak always observed from July to August.

CONCLUSION:

Low culture positivity is worrying and requires further work into improving diagnostic protocols. Decreasing trends in MDR are a welcome sign. Information on seasonal changes that peak in July–August can help laboratories better prepare for this time with adequate buffer stocks to ensure culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, UTI, uropathogens, seasonality


Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common infections, accounting for 8.1 million visits to healthcare professionals each year. Globally, 150 million people suffer from UTIs, resulting in health-care expenditure of 6 billion USD per annum.1 Many studies from South-East Asia have shown that Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are the most common pathogens isolated from patients with UTIs.2 A recent study conducted in Eastern Nepal reported an E. coli prevalence of 57% among patients with UTI.3 Another study reported prevalences of respectively 53% and 7% for E. coli and K. pneumoniae among paediatric patients.4 A worrying trend has been the increasing rates of multidrug resistance (MDR) in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, which lead to difficulties in selecting appropriate empirical therapy and achieving treatment success.5,6

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a major problem for effective treatment of infectious diseases world-wide, is responsible for increased mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay and increased healthcare costs.7 Nepal mirrors the global scene of the growing burden of AMR due to widespread and irrational use of antibiotics, along with poor healthcare systems and poor infection control and prevention measures.8 The National Public Health Laboratory (NPHL) has reported E. coli antibiotic resistance rates >50% for cefixime, nalidixic acid, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, norfloxacin, ofloxacin and cefotaxime, with increasing trends in AMR between 2006 and 2010.9

Organisms exhibiting resistance to three or more classes of antibiotics are considered multidrug-resistant.10 Understanding MDR patterns in organisms causing UTI in Nepal is imperative to inform clinical practice and improve antibiotic stewardship in relation to appropriate antibiotic use in patients with UTI. The evidence generated will also guide medical professionals in treating patients with UTIs and assist policy-makers in developing appropriate AMR guidelines.

This work will help to identify constraints of AMR control activities. In turn, this can help strengthen the national antibiotic resistance programme to focus on the implementation of innovative AMR surveillance, advocate for better resource allocation and improve collaboration between the sub-national and local governments to ensure actions against AMR on the ground.11 Although previous studies conducted on UTI have documented bacteriological profiles, the trends and seasonality of AMR patterns among commonly isolated UTI-causing bacteria have not been previously reported in Nepal. We aimed therefore to determine the yield of bacterial growth, the common bacteria causing UTI and the trends in MDR among E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates from 2014 to 2018 in patients visiting a tertiary care hospital in Eastern Nepal. We also examined if there was any seasonality in the number of culture-positive specimens isolated.

METHODS

Study design

This was a cross-sectional study involving analysis of secondary data routinely collected in the laboratory.

Setting

Nepal is a landlocked country in South-East Asia, with an estimated population of 29,553,510.12 The National Action Plan (NAP) on AMR for Nepal recognises the National Public Health Laboratory (NPHL; Kathmandu, Nepal) under the Department of Health Services as a focal point for the surveillance of AMR through the WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) platform. The Quality Standards and Regulation Division (QSRD) under the Ministry of Health and Population (MoHP) leads the implementation of the NAP.

This study was conducted at the B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS; Dharan, Eastern Nepal), a 813-bed teaching hospital, with over 40,000 admissions per year and a bed occupancy rate of nearly 70%. The average number of patients attending the hospital is 1,000 per day.13,14

The Institute has three independent units, Microbiology, Haematology and Biochemistry. The microbiology laboratory is further divided into bacteriology, serology, parasitology, mycology and mycobacteriology. The average number of samples (blood, urine, exudates, stools) received in the bacteriology unit is 48,000 per year, and the average number of urine samples for culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) is 15,000 per year.13,14 External quality assessment is done by NPHL every quarter and internal quality control is maintained by monthly testing using American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) for Staphylococcus aureus 25922, E. coli 25923 and K. pneumoniae 13883 and 70063.

Urine specimens received at the laboratory are inoculated onto cystine lactose electrolyte deficient (CLED) media by using a calibrated loop (0.001/mL). All the media are incubated at 35°C for 18–24 h. With positive urine cultures, the identification of organisms and AST are performed following Clinical And Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI; Payne, PA, USA) guidelines.15 Organisms exhibiting resistance to three or more classes of antibiotics are considered multidrug-resistant.10

Demographic details, dates of sample testing and reporting results, culture and AST results are documented in the paper-based registers, which are then transcribed electronically using the QLab software (Baltimore, MD, USA) and stored in a database.

Study population and period

We included urine samples of patients with presumptive UTI received for culture and AST at the BPKIHS microbiology laboratory from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2018.

Data variables and sources of data

Data variables included age, sex, date of culture examination, culture result (positive or negative), organism isolated and AST pattern (resistant, susceptible and intermediate). All data were extracted from the electronic database of the laboratory.

Data analysis and statistics

Data were exported and analysed using Stata v12.1m (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). The unit of analysis was the urine sample tested and not the patient, because patients may have been tested multiple times during the study period, possibly for different episodes of UTIs. We assessed the overall culture positivity (proportion culture-positive out of specimens tested) and described the number (proportion) of each organism isolated. We analysed the AST patterns of two key uropathogens (E. coli and K. pneumoniae) using frequencies and proportions, and presented these as bar charts.

We examined for seasonality using a time-series plot of monthly numbers tested and identified as culture-positive. Seasonal trends were analysed by a seasonal auto-regressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) model using a time-domain approach.16,17 We used Gretl software (gretl 1.7.9cvs) according to the following steps: 1) initially, the time-series plot was drawn to identify the pattern of occurrence of culture-confirmed cases per month; 2) a correlogram was drawn to identify the appropriate number of lag periods and moving averages to fit the model; 3) to achieve stationary time series data, seasonal differences with ARIMA were estimated using the augmented Dickey-Fuller test; and 4) among the various postulated combinations of autoregression and moving average models, the model with the best possible fit was estimated using the exact maximum likelihood estimation method. The model that gave the lowest Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) value was considered the best predictive model.

Ethics considerations

Ethics approval was obtained from Ethical Advisory Group of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France (E7/20) and the Institution Review Committee (IRC) at the B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal. (IRC/ I787/020). Permission to access data was obtained from the department. As we used secondary data without personal identifiers, the need for informed consent was waived by the ethics committees.

RESULTS

A total of 116,417 urine samples tested, of which 19,671 (16.9%) were culture-positive. There was an increasing trend in the number of samples tested, number identified culture-positive and culture positivity over the study period (Figure 1). Most (66.6%) specimens came from female patients. The median age was 32 years (interquartile range [IQR] 22–58), which varied among males (55 years, IQR 25–70) and females (28 years, IQR 22–44). Most of the bacteria (80.1%) isolated were Gram-negative, E. coli (54.3%) being the most common, followed by K. pneumoniae (8.8%) (Table 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Annual trend of urine numbers tested, number of samples cultured and culture positivity from 2014 to 2018. Figure 1 shows three indicators: number of urine samples tested (the total bar which includes both the green and red portions), number culture-positive (red portion) and proportion that is culture-positive (indicated by the percentages within the red portion).

TABLE 1.

Number and proportion of bacteria isolated among culture-positive urine specimens examined at B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal, 2014–2018 (n = 19,671)

Type of organism n (%)
Gram-positive 3,896 (19.9)
  Staphylococcus aureus 2038 (10.3)
  Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 45 (0.2)
  Streptococcus species 25 (0.1)
  Enterococcus faecalis 1,788 (9.1)
Gram-negative 15,775 (80.1)
  Escherichia coli 10,630 (54.3)
  Klebsiella pneumoniae 1,721 (8.8)
  Klebsiella oxytoca 248 (1.3)
  Enterobacter species 428 (2.2)
  Acinetobacter baumanii complex 1,148 (5.9)
  Pseudomonas aeruginosa 692 (3.5)
  Citrobacter freundi 580 (3.0)
  Citrobacter diversens 46 (0.2)
  Proteus mirabilis 154 (0.8)
  Proteus vulgaris 73 (0.4)
  Morgenella morganii 25 (0.1)
  Providencia species 9 (0.0)
  Serratia marcescens 7 (0.0)
  Missing 14 (0.1)

Resistance in E.coli

Among 10,630 E. coli isolates, 86.5% were resistant to ampicillin and 58.2% were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Resistance to different cephalosporins was also high, ranging from 53.6% to 78.6%. E. coli were least resistant to tigecycline (1.2%), followed by nitrofurantoin (8.1%), amikacin (8.4%), imipenem (12.8%), piperacillin-tazobactam (13.8%), gentamicin (15.7%) and meropenem (31.7%) (Table 2). While there was a decreasing trend in resistance to meropenem (56% in year 2015 to 10.7% in 2018), resistance to imipenem showed an increasing trend (1.3% in year 2015 to 45% in 2018) (Supplementary Figure S1).

TABLE 2.

Antibiotic susceptibility patterns in Escherichia coli isolated from urine samples examined at B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal, 2014–2018 (n = 10,630)

Drug Tested Susceptible Intermediate Resistant




N % n % n % n %
Amikacin 5295 49.8 4831 91.2 21 0.4 443 8.4
Ampicillin 6440 60.6 651 13.2 18 0.3 5571 86.5
Cefaperazone sulbactum 14 0.1 2 14.3 1 7.1 11 78.6
Cefepime 1763 16.6 773 43.9 46 2.6 944 53.6
Cefexime 3684 34.7 1221 33.1 29 0.8 2434 66.1
Cefotaxime 4365 41.1 1871 42.9 112 2.6 2382 54.6
Ceftazidime 7087 66.7 2690 38.0 144 2.0 4253 60.0
Ceftriaxone 3801 35.8 1618 42.6 40 1.1 2143 56.4
Ciprofloxacin 4725 44.4 1911 40.4 62 1.3 2752 58.2
Cotrimoxazole 4599 43.3 1964 42.7 8 0.2 2627 57.1
Gentamycin 3628 34.1 3014 83.1 45 1.2 569 15.7
Imipenam 6641 62.5 5682 85.6 111 1.7 848 12.8
Levofloxacin 1668 15.7 750 45.0 51 3.1 867 52.0
Meropenam 3355 31.6 2186 65.2 107 3.2 1062 31.7
Nalidixic acid 5032 47.3 957 19.0 8 0.2 4067 80.8
Nitrofurantoin 9190 86.5 8343 90.8 107 1.2 740 8.1
Norfloxacin 6226 58.6 2615 42.0 66 1.1 3545 56.9
Ofloxacin 4921 46.3 1963 39.9 46 0.9 2912 59.2
Piperacillin tazobactum 2917 27.4 2477 84.9 2 50.0 390 13.8
Tigecycline 1925 18.1 1880 97.7 22 1.1 23 1.2

Resistance in K. pneumoniae

K. pneumoniae isolates were most resistant to ampicillin (98.4%) and the various cephalosporins (43.6–88.2%), and least resistant to tigecycline (10.9%), followed by imipenem (12.7%), piperacillin-tazobactam (17.8%) and amikacin (19%). Resistance to fluoroquinolones was modest, ranging from 33.8% to 37.5% (Table 3). There was a decreasing trend in resistance to meropenem (37.3% in year 2015 to 19.3% in 2018) and an increasing trend in resistance to imipenem (3.8% in year 2015 to 30.5% in 2018). There was also a decreasing trend in resistance to gentamicin (32.6% in year 2014 to 21.6% in 2018) (Supplementary Figure S2).

TABLE 3.

Antibiotic susceptibility patterns in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from urine samples examined at B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal, 2014–2018 (n = 1721)

Drug Tested Susceptible Intermediate Resistant




N % n % n % n %
Amikacin 866 50.3 693 80.0 6 0.7 167 19.3
Ampicillin 826 48.0 13 1.6 0 0.0 813 98.4
Cefaperazone sulbactum 17 1.0 2 11.8 0 0.0 15 88.2
Cefepime 250 14.5 139 55.6 2 0.8 109 43.6
Cefexime 673 39.1 269 40.0 4 0.6 400 59.4
Cefotaxime 687 39.9 339 49.3 17 2.5 331 48.2
Ceftazidime 1097 63.7 446 40.7 26 2.4 625 57.0
Ceftriaxone 589 34.2 304 51.6 4 0.7 281 47.7
Ciprofloxacin 768 44.6 475 61.9 5 0.7 288 37.5
Cotrimoxazole 731 42.5 344 47.1 1 0.1 386 52.8
Gentamycin 606 35.2 448 73.9 4 0.7 154 25.4
Imipenam 1090 63.3 942 86.4 10 0.9 138 12.7
Levofloxacin 311 18.1 203 65.3 3 1.0 105 33.8
Meropenam 542 31.5 388 71.6 16 3.0 138 25.5
Nalidixic acid 785 45.6 361 46.0 14 1.8 410 52.2
Nitrofurantoin 1500 87.2 929 61.9 63 4.2 508 33.9
Norfloxacin 975 56.7 631 64.7 7 0.7 337 34.6
Ofloxacin 831 48.3 511 61.5 13 1.6 307 36.9
Piperacillin tazobactum 472 27.4 376 79.7 12 2.5 84 17.8
Tigecycline 331 19.2 264 79.8 31 9.4 36 10.9

Multidrug resistance

Overall, MDR was observed in 42.5% of E. coli and 36% of K. pneumoniae isolates (Table 4). MDR was higher in males and people aged >55 years, but showed a decreasing trend over the years – the highest levels were seen in 2014–2015 (56–61%) and decreased in 2016–2018 (28.7% to 36.8%).

TABLE 4.

Factors associated with multidrug resistance among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from urine samples examined at B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal, 2014–2018

Variable E. coli (n = 10,630) K. pneumoniae (n = 1,721)


n % n %
Total 4547 42.8 620 36.0
Sex*
 Male 1978 58.9 339 56.3
 Female 2569 35.3 281 25.1
Age, years
 <15 458 46.4 46 30.5
 15–24 727 31.2 92 22.4
 25–34 621 31.1 78 22.9
 35–44 472 43.0 57 32.4
 45–54 452 46.8 56 43.4
 55–64 630 55.1 96 55.8
  >65 1185 56.2 195 57.0
Year
 2014 785 56.4 117 50.7
 2015 1121 61.0 112 40.9
 2016 769 33.7 146 33.7
 2017 916 36.8 106 28.7
 2018 956 36.4 139 33.7

*χ2 P = 0.0001.

P for trend 0.0001.

Seasonality analysis

Month-wise distribution of total of urine samples tested and urine culture positivity during 2014–2018 are shown in Figure 2A and 2B. There was an increasing trend in the numbers of samples tested and culture positivity over the years, and in each year the peak was observed from July to August. Except for 2018, the peak in culture-positive samples coincided with the total number of samples received across all the years. The models which accounted for seasonality (i.e., SARIMA models) had the lowest AIC values, indicating better model fit than models that did not adjust for seasonality (Supplementary Table S1) – confirming the hypothesis of seasonality. Similarly, residuals (defined as differences between actual values and estimated values derived from the model) were lower in the SARIMA model (Figure 3) than in ARIMA models – again indicating seasonality.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Total number of A) urine samples by month, 2014–2018; and B) culture-positive urine samples by month, 2014–2018.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Number of culture-positive urine samples isolated at B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Nepal, 2014–2018, by month (observed vs. fitted with SARIMA model). SARIMA = seasonal auto-regressive integrated moving average.

DISCUSSION

This is one of the largest studies from Nepal to assess culture positivity and AST patterns in urine specimens collected from patients with presumptive UTI. This is also the first study from Nepal assessing seasonality in urine specimens examined for culture and AST. We discuss the key findings below.

First, culture positivity of urine samples ranged from 15.4% to 18.9%, with an increasing trend during the study period. This is similar to some previous studies from Nepal which showed culture positivity ranging between 13.8% and 17.4%.18,19 In contrast, Rizal et al. from Nepal and several studies from India reported higher culture positivity ranging from 46% to 55.8%.20,21 While we are unclear about the reasons for these differences, we speculate this may have been due to differences in patient populations and clinical criteria used for requesting urine culture.

Second, females accounted for two-thirds of the patients in our study, which is similar to other studies from India (73.6%, 46.6%)2123 and Nepal (83.9%, 75%).18,24 This may be due to a combination of biological female factors (such as proximity of the urethral meatus to the anus, shorter urethra and less acidic pH of the vaginal surface). The age distribution was different among females and males: females were younger, whereas males were relatively older (median age, 28 years vs. 55 years). The age distribution in our study is similar to the study published by Prakash et al. from Meerut, India.22 In contrast to our findings, other studies have found older people (aged 50–80 years) to be infected.25,26

Third, we found that E. coli and K. pneumoniae were the most common Gram-negative bacteria isolated. This finding is similar to those from a study performed by Dipak B et al.,27 Lawhale et al.,28 Joshi et al.22 and Sokn et al.29 Among the Gram-positive isolates, S. aureus was the most common, followed by methicillin-resistant S. aureus, which is similar to reports from other studies.22,18,28

Fourth, MDR was high and was reported in respectively 42.8% and 36% of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates – much higher than reports from South Lebanon29 and Iran (25.1–27.9%).30 Most of the previous studies from Nepal reflect similar levels, barring one study by Gurugain et al., which reported MDR of 66.7% in E.coli.31 MDR was also higher in males and older age groups. This is probably due to altered immunity, prostate enlargement, neurogenic bladders and requirements for catheterisation in older age. There was a decreasing trend in MDR over the years, which is heartening, and may reflect better compliance to hospital antibiotic policy and infection control measures. This may also indicate a possible shift in patient profiles – more outpatients investigated for presumed UTI than admitted patients in recent years.

Finally, there was a seasonal trend in the culture-positive urine specimens isolated, and the peak was seen in late summer and the early rainy season (July–August). This may be related to changes in environmental temperature, the relative dehydration in summer and human behaviour at these times such as travel, water consumption and recreational water exposure, which can predispose to many diseases. Seasonality has been reported previously by other researchers from the United Kingdom and Canada.32,33

Our study had some strengths. We had a large sample size, with more than 100,000 samples examined over 5 years in the biggest tertiary hospital in Eastern Nepal. Our findings are therefore generalisable to the situation in Eastern Nepal. AST was performed extensively for many available drugs. We had information on the date of culture examination, which enabled the assessment of seasonality in urine cultures. The results are likely to be reliable, as culture and AST was performed per CLSI guidelines in a quality-assured, accredited laboratory. Being an AMR surveillance site, the study laboratory shares an external quality control testing protocol with NPHL, the reference laboratory of Nepal.

There were a few limitations. First, AST was not done consistently for all the antibiotics during the study period because of the unavailability of antibiotics disc. Hence, the proportion of isolates tested for each drug varied, and AST results for some antibiotics may suffer from uncertainty due to small numbers. Second, there was no information on the referring departments and various other baseline clinical characteristics of patients. This would have provided additional insights about factors associated with culture positivity and AMR. Third, there were challenges in extracting the data from the electronic database due to the multiple softwares used during the study and lack of IT expertise. This caused some problems with the periodic analysis and the generation of antibiograms. Fourth, not all patients with presumptive UTI may have been tested; this, in turn, may not give a true picture of culture positivity. This suggests that clinician practices need to be better aligned with clinical protocols in the hospital, especially when requesting for laboratory tests.

Despite these limitations, our study findings have some important implications. First, information on seasonality may be useful for the hospital to prepare for an increased workload, as well as efficient procurement and antibiotic supply chain management between July and August. Second, there is a need to review the existing electronic databases and the multiple softwares used, and develop an simpler system for periodic data extraction. This should improve analysis of surveillance data and creation of antibiograms. Sharing these antibiograms that show emerging trends in resistance with clinicians is crucial for better antibiotic stewardship. Third, the low yield of culture is worrying, and requires further investigation into improving diagnostic protocols with a view to decreasing the laboratory workload.

In conclusion, although there was an increasing trend in culture positivity among the urine specimens tested, overall positivity remained low. This is worrying, and requires further investigation and surveillance. E. coli was the most common micro-organism, followed by K. pneumoniae. Both showed an increasing trend in AMR to commonly used antibiotics. While overall levels of MDR were high, there was a decreasing trend over the years, which is a welcome sign. Information on infection seasonality, with a peak in July–August, can help in laboratory preparedness by ensuring there are adequate buffer stocks during that period for culture and AST reagents.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was conducted through the Structured Operational Research and Training Initiative (SORT IT), a global partnership coordinated by Tropical Disease Research (TDR), the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases at the WHO. The specific SORT IT programme that led to these publications included a partnership of TDR with the WHO Country Office of Nepal and was implemented along with the Tuberculosis Research and Prevention Centre Non-Governmental Organisation, Yerevan, Armenia; the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Paris, France, and South East Asia, New Delhi, India offices; the Damien Foundation, Brussels, Belgium; the Narotam Sekhsaria Foundation, Mumbai, India; Sustainable Health Systems, Freetown, Sierra Leone; the Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal; the Institute of Medical Research, Bangalore, India; University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; and the University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Footnotes

Special thanks to all the staff of the Department of Microbiology at the B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal, for their constant support; R

Das, R Sukhla and B Jaiswal for their support; and Professor A D Harries for his overall edits to improve the English language.

This SORT IT AMR Programme was funded by the National Institute of Health Research, Department of Health & Social Care of the United Kingdom and supported by implementing partners.

Conflict of interests: none declared.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and may not necessarily reflect those of their affiliated institutions.

References

  • 1.Foxman B, et al. Urinary tract infection: self-reported incidence and associated costs. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10:509–515. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00072-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nuntra S, Carrol CK. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in Southeast Asia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;5:15. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0115-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shah C, et al. Virulence factors of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) and correlation with antimicrobial resistance. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19:204–208. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1587-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shrestha LB, et al. Clinical, etiological and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of pediatric urinary tract infections in a tertiary care hospital of Nepal. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19:36–44. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1410-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kumar A, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of urine culture isolates in a tertiary care hospital of Jharkhand, India. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2017;6(7):1733–1739. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sierra-Díaz E, Hernández-Ríos CJ, Bravo-Cuellar A. Antibiotic resistance: microbiological profile of urinary tract infections in Mexico. Cir Cir. 2019;87(2):176–182. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.18000494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zakieh R, Ali Afshar T. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of urinary tract pathogens. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2009;20(2):251–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Acharya PK, Wilson T. Antimicrobial resistance in Nepal. Front Med. 2019;6:105E. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Siegel D, et al. Management of MDR organism in health care settings, 2006. The healthcare infection control. Practices Advisory Committee. Atlanta, GA, USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017. http://www.cdc.gov/infectionguidelines.mdro [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Government of Nepal National Antimicrobial Resistance Containment Action Plan, Nepal, 2016. Kathmandu, Nepal: Government of Nepal; 2016. https://www.flemingfund.org/wpcontent/uploads/3d9bf4b7ab190c600921a99cf1803059.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 11.World Health Organization GLASS | Global antimicrobial resistance surveillance system (GLASS) report [Internet] Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2018. https://www.who.int/glass/resources/publications/early-implementation-report/en/ [Google Scholar]
  • 12.World Bank Country and Lending Groups World Bank Data Help Desk. New York, NY, USA: World Bank; 2021. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groupsaccess [Google Scholar]
  • 13.B P Koirala Insitute of Health Sciences Annual Report and Plan of Action, 2019–2020. Dharan, Nepal: BPIKHS; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Document No M100. 27th ed. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Siriyasatien P, et al. Analysis of significant factors for dengue fever incidence prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016;17:166. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1034-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Edson ZM, da Silva EAS. Predicting the number of cases of dengue infection in Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo State, Brazil, using a SARIMA model. Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27(9):1809–1818. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2011000900014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pradhan B, Pradhan SB. Prevalence of urinary tract infection and antibiotic susceptibility pattern to urinary pathogens in Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Duwakot. Biratnagar J Health Sci. 2017;2(1):134–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Subedi N, Pudasaini S. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in patients with urinary tract infection. J Pathol Nepal. 2017;7:1066–1069. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rijal A, et al. Antibiotic susceptibility of organisms causing urinary tract infection in patients presenting to a teaching hospital. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2012;10(20):24–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Patel BH, et al. Causative agents of urinary tract infections and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns at a referral center in Western India: An audit to help clinicians prevent antibiotic misuse. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019;8(1):154–159. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_203_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Prakash D, Saxena S R. Distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial pathogens causing urinary tract infection in urban community of Meerut City, India. ISRN Microbiol. 2013:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2013/749629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kumar A, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of urine culture isolates in a tertiary care hospital of Jharkhand, India. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2017;6(7):1733–1739. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Singh RK, et al. Prevalence of antibiotic sensitivity pattern of uropathogens in patients of different age-groups from western region of Nepal. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2016;5(9):1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Joshi RD, et al. Isolation of organism and its drug sensitivity patterns in patients in urinary tract infection at Kathmandu Model Hospital. Nepal J Obstetr Gynecol. 2018;24(1):46–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eshwarappa M, et al. Clinico-microbiological profile of urinary tract infection in south India. India Nephrol. 2011;21(1):31–36. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.75226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dipak B, et al. Bacterial uropathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern at a tertiary care hospital in Birgunj, Nepal. J National Medical College. 2017;2(1):74–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lawhale AM, Naikwade R. Recent pattern of sensitivity of most commonly isolated uropathogens from Central India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5(8):3631–3636. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sokhn ES, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibilities and laboratory profiles of Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis isolates as agents of urinary tract infection in Lebanon: paving the way for better diagnostics. Med Sci. 2020;8(3):32. doi: 10.3390/medsci8030032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Moini S, et al. Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from patients in Kashan, Iran. Microbiol. 2015;8(10):e27517. doi: 10.5812/jjm.27517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guragain N, et al. Extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Gram-negative bacterial isolates from urine of patients visiting Everest Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Tribhuvan University J Microbiol. 2019;6(1):26–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rosello A, et al. Seasonality of urinary tract infections in the United Kingdom in different age groups: longitudinal analysis of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Epidemiol Infect. 2018;146:37–45. doi: 10.1017/S095026881700259X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Anderson JE. Seasonality of symptomatic bacterial urinary infections in women. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1983;37:286–290. doi: 10.1136/jech.37.4.286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Action are provided here courtesy of The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

RESOURCES