Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Nov 9;268:118844. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118844

Particle composition, sources and evolution during the COVID-19 lockdown period in Chengdu, southwest China: Insights from single particle aerosol mass spectrometer data

Junke Zhang a, Huan Li a, Luyao Chen a, Xiaojuan Huang b, Wei Zhang c, Rui Zhao a,
PMCID: PMC8575539  PMID: 34776748

Abstract

In order to investigate the effects of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown on air quality in cities in southwest China, a single particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SPAMS) and other online equipments were used to measure the air pollution in Chengdu, one of the megacities in this area, before and during the lockdown period. It was found that the concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2) and carbon monoxide (CO) decreased by 38.6%, 77.5%, 47.0%, 35.1% and 14.1%, respectively, while the concentration of ozone (O3) increased by 57.5% from the time before to the time during lockdown. All particles collected during the study period could be divided into eight categories: biomass burning (BB), coal combustion (CC), vehicle emissions (VE), cooking emissions (CE), Dust, K-nitrate (K–NO3), K-sulfate (K–SO4) and K-sulfate-nitrate (K-SN) particles, and their contributions changed significantly after the beginning of lockdown. Compared to before lockdown, the contribution of VE particles experienced the largest reduction (by 14.9%), whereas the contributions of BB and CE particles increased by 7.0% and 7.3%, respectively, during the lockdown period. Regional transmission was critical for pollution formation before lockdown, whereas the pollution that occurred during the lockdown period was caused mainly by locally emitted particles (such as VE, CE and BB particles). Weighted potential source contribution function (WPSCF) analysis further verified and emphasized the difference in the contribution of regional transmission for pollution formation before and during lockdown. In addition, the potential source area and intensity of the particles emitted from different sources or formation mechanisms were quite different.

Keywords: Single aerosol particles, COVID-19 lockdown, Pollution episodes, Weighted potential source contribution function

1. Introduction

At the end of 2019, there was a sudden outbreak of the Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19) in China, which, as it did across most of the globe, went on to reach pandemic level, posing serious threats to public life and health. In order to prevent the spread of COVID-19, a first-level public health emergency response (ELPHER) was triggered throughout China in January 2020. During the ELPHER period, except for some mainstay sectors that maintained the operation of ordinary human life and society, most sectors, including traffic, construction, commerce, catering, tourism and industrial activities, were subjected to an extreme or complete standstill (Huang et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2020). Therefore, the ELPHER period is also called the “COVID-19 lockdown” period. Since various types of anthropogenic sources are important contributors to air pollutants, especially in urban areas, all control measures during the lockdown period not only effectively limited the spread of the epidemic, but also made great changes in the emissions of air pollutants from anthropogenic sources. Therefore, this lockdown provides a unique opportunity to investigate the response of air pollution to a drastic reduction in emissions from anthropogenic sources.

Accordingly, a large number of studies over the past year from across the globe have already evaluated the variations in air pollutants during the COVID-19 lockdown period. In North America, Berman and Ebisu (2020) found that the concentration of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) decreased by 25.5%, while the change in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) (decreased of 4.5%) was not as large as that of NO2 in the USA, which may be because multiple non-transportation sources contributed PM2.5 concentrations. In Europe, Menut et al. (2020) found that the concentrations of NO2 and PM2.5 decreased by 30%–50% and 5%–10%, respectively, in all of western Europe during the lockdown periods, while the ozone (O3) concentration increased. In Asia, the results reported by Sharma et al. (2020) demonstrated that the concentrations of coarse particulate matter (PM10) and PM2.5 witnessed maximum reductions (>50.0%) compared to the period before lockdown. As the first country to experience a massive outbreak of COVID-19, the characteristics of pollutant changes in China during the lockdown period have been reported in many cities, such as Beijing (Huang et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2020), Shanghai (Li et al., 2020), Wuhan (Zheng et al., 2020) and Suzhou (Wang et al., 2021a). For gaseous pollutants, most of the results from these studies are consistent; that is, nitric oxide (NO), NO2, carbon monoxide (CO) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) decreased, while O3 increased. For PM2.5, although its concentration decreased in some cities, such as Hangzhou (Liu et al., 2021), Nanjing (Wang et al., 2021b) and Wuhan (Zheng et al., 2020), serious pollution episodes still occurred in some cities or regions, such as Shanghai (Chang et al., 2020) and the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region (Zhao et al., 2020), and unfavorable meteorological conditions, local emission sources, regional transmission and the formation of secondary pollutants were important causes of these episodes.

Sichuan province, located in southwest China, with a population of over 83 million (https://data.stats.gov.cn), has also been seriously affected by the COVID-19. Sichuan began its ELPHER period on January 25, 2020, and the whole province went into lockdown on the same day. Many previous studies have pointed out that air pollution in Sichuan province is affected by the topography and climate of the basin and the pollution formation mechanism is obviously different from that of cities in North China (Gao et al., 2018; Ji et al., 2016; Luo et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2018b). Although many studies have reported the effects of COVID-19 lockdown on the air pollution in many cities in China, studies on Sichuan province or southwest China are fewer. At the same time, those studies on Sichuan province that have been conducted mainly focused on the variations in air pollution indexes (PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, CO and O3) before and during the lockdown period (Benchrif et al., 2021; Deng et al., 2021; Fan et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2020c; Zhang et al., 2020), and there is almost no in-depth research on the chemical composition, source and pollution formation mechanism of particulate matter. Therefore, in order to obtain more information about the effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on air pollution in southwest China, single particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SPAMS) observations, as well as those from other types of online observation equipments, were used to measure the atmospheric single aerosol particles and gaseous pollutants in Chengdu, the capital city of Sichuan province, before and during the lockdown period. Then, the composition and sources of single aerosol particles and pollution formation mechanisms in different periods were analyzed, which is of great significance for evaluating the contribution and emissions reduction potential of different types of anthropogenic sources to air pollution in this area.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Sampling site and instruments

The measurement period ran from January 15 to February 14, 2020. The observation site was located on the roof (25 m above ground level) of the School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University (30.70° N, 104.06° E). The building is located near the North Second Ring Road, which is surrounded by roads, schools, shopping malls, restaurants and residential areas, and therefore reflects the typical atmospheric conditions in urban Chengdu. According to the implementation of the lockdown, the whole measurement period can be further divided into before (January 15 to 24) and during (January 25 to February 14) the lockdown period (see Fig. 1 ).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Time series of meteorological parameters and concentrations of gaseous pollutants, PM2.5 and PM10 during the study period (the gray background indicates the period before lockdown, while the rest is the COVID-19 lockdown period).

The SPAMS instrument employed in this study, developed by Hexin Analytical Instrument Co, Ltd (Guangzhou, China) and described in detail by Li et al. (2011), was used to measure the size and mass spectral information of single aerosol particles with a vacuum aerodynamic diameter ranging from 0.2 to 2.0 μm. Meanwhile, gaseous pollutants, including CO, SO2, nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2) and O3 were measured with CO12M, AF22M, AC32M and O342M analyzers (Environment SA, France), respectively. The mass concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were continuously measured using beta attenuation mass monitors (BAM 1020, Met One Instruments, Inc., USA). In addition, meteorological parameters, including temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, wind speed and wind direction, were available from automatic meteorological observation instruments (FRT X09A, Fronttech, China) (Zhang et al., 2017, 2018).

2.2. Data analysis

2.2.1. SPAMS data analysis

The particle size and chemical composition were obtained via SPAMS mass spectral analysis using the Computational Continuation Core (version 3.0) toolkit in MATLAB 7.1.2 (Math Works Inc., Natick, MA, USA). The mass spectral data were grouped into different clusters using an adaptive resonance theory neural network algorithm (ART-2a) with a vigilance factor of 0.6 and a learning rate of 0.05 over 20 iterations (Hopke and Song, 1997; Song and Hopke, 1999). Then, the first 158 clusters generated by ART-2a (representing more than 96% of all the analyzed particles) were further manually merged into eight particle types based on the similarity of chemical features and temporal variations. Each particle type was named by its chemical composition, but the name does not represent all chemical species in the single particle mass spectra.

2.2.2. Weighted potential source contribution function

The potential source contribution function (PSCF) is an effective method for identifying a regional source on the basis of the HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) model (Draxler et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2009). The conditional probability function of the pollution contribution of each grid to the affected area was indicated by calculating the ratio of pollution trajectory to the residence time of all trajectories in the passing area. In this study, the pollution criterion values for PM2.5 and different particle types were chosen as 75 μg m−3 and the 70th percentile of hourly average concentrations, respectively. The whole study area was divided into i × j small grids, where n ij is the number of all trajectories passing through this grid, and m ij is the number of pollution trajectories (Polissar et al., 1999). The corresponding PSCF calculation formula is:

PSCFij=mijnij

In this study, the PSCF grid covered a domain over the range of 27–34°N and 100–110°E with 0.1° × 0.1° resolution. It is worth noting that cells with few endpoints can lead to a high degree of uncertainty in the PSCF method, and so an arbitrary weight function Wij was multiplied into the PSCF values to better reflect the uncertainty in the values for these cells (Wang et al., 2015b). Then, the calculation formula could be written as WPSCFij = Wij mijnij.

Here, Wij was adopted as:

Wij={1.00nij>3nave0.701.5nave<nij3nave0.40nave<nij1.5nave0.17nijnave

in which nave is the average number of trajectory endpoints of each grid.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Pollution characteristics before and during the lockdown period

As shown in Fig. 1, the meteorological parameters in the two periods were similar, with average temperatures of 9.0 ± 1.7 °C and 10.1 ± 2.7 °C, and relative humidities of 70.1 ± 13.9% and 69.0 ± 13.0% before and during the lockdown period, respectively. Meanwhile, the meteorological conditions were stable and the wind speed was low, with mean values of 1.5 ± 1.0 m s−1 and 1.5 ± 0.9 m s−1, respectively, in the two periods.

Unlike the meteorological parameters, gaseous pollutants experienced significant changes during the lockdown period. NO, which is mainly emitted from vehicles in cities (Dumka et al., 2019), experienced the largest reduction (77.5%). The reduction in NO2, the oxidation product of NO, reached 47.0%. The reduction in the SO2 concentration (35.1%) was lower than that of NO and NO2, which may have been because some coal-fired industries (such as coal-fired power plants) were still needed for normal life, and continued to operate during the lockdown period. The pollutant from incomplete combustion processes, i.e. CO, decreased by only 14.1%, which was a much lower reduction than that of other gaseous pollutants. This is because biomass burning, one important source of CO in Sichuan province, even increased around Chengdu during the lockdown period (see section 3.2). O3 was the only gaseous pollutant that increased during the lockdown period, with an increase of 57.5%. This is consistent with the results reported in other cities around the world, such as the increases of 57.7% in Barcelona (Tobias et al., 2020), 36.0% in Wuhan (Sicard et al., 2020) and 53.1% in Shanghai (Liu et al., 2021), which can be attributed to there being less NO to react with O3, as well as less heterogeneous HO2 (hydroperoxyl) radical loss and higher actinic flux with lower particle concentrations (Chu et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2020).

It was found that the average mass concentration of PM2.5 was significantly reduced by 38.6% from the period before (75.9 ± 27.5 μg m−3) to the period during (46.6 ± 20.9 μg m−3) lockdown due to the control over and reduction in emissions from various anthropogenic sources, and similar reductions were also observed in Beijing (20.0%) (Wang et al., 2020a) and Hangzhou (50.0%) (Liu et al., 2021). Meanwhile, the average mass concentrations of PM10 were also reduced, from 92.4 ± 31.8 μg m−3 to 52.8 ± 24.2 μg m−3, and accordingly there was an obvious improvement in visibility from 6.9 ± 3.9 km to 10.8 ± 4.4 km. The ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 has been used to evaluate the relative contributions of fine/coarse particles to air pollution. In this study, compared to the period before lockdown (0.82), the PM2.5/PM10 ratio increased to 0.88 during the lockdown period, which means that the contribution of fine particles to total particles increased in Chengdu during the lockdown period. This can be attributed to the combined effect of the Chinese New Year and the strict epidemic controls imposed during the lockdown period, when all kinds of construction activities in the city stopped completely and road dust caused by vehicles was also significantly reduced due to citizens being restricted from going out.

It can be seen from the above analysis that various control measures during the COVID-19 lockdown period effectively reduced most pollutants and improved air quality and visibility in Chengdu. However, the average mass concentration of PM2.5 (46.6 ± 20.9 μg m−3) was still higher than the national standard (35 μg m−3) and the O3 concentration rebounded significantly during the lockdown period. Therefore, the control of air pollution in Chengdu is still facing great challenges, even if anthropogenic sources can be greatly reduced.

3.2. Single particle classification and compositions

Through Art-2a and manual merging, all single particles collected during the entire study periods could be divided into eight categories: biomass burning (BB), coal combustion (CC), vehicle emissions (VE), cooking emissions (CE), Dust, and three kinds of secondary inorganic particles [K-nitrate (K–NO3), K-sulfate (K–SO4) and K-sulfate-nitrate (K-SN)]. Fig. 2 shows the average positive and negative mass spectra of these types of particles.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Average mass spectra of different types of particles.

3.2.1. Biomass burning (BB) particles

Most previous studies have pointed out that 39[K]+ is a critical tracer for biomass burning source (Wang et al., 2015a; Zheng et al., 2020). Meanwhile, a strong −26[CN] peak in the mass spectrum of BB particles was found in the study by Chen et al. (2017). Therefore, the first kind of particle was identified as BB particles due to the intense peaks of 39[K]+ and −26[CN] appearing in the positive and negative mass spectra, respectively. In addition, the nitrate and sulfate ion peaks (−46[NO2], −62[NO3] and −97[HSO4]) in the negative mass spectrum were high, suggesting that this type of particle had undergone a significant aging process (Bi et al., 2011). BB particles accounted for 8.8% of total particles over the whole study period and their contribution increased from 5.1% to 12.1% from the period before to the period during lockdown (Fig. 3 ). In general, there is no biomass burning in the urban area and the BB particles in Chengdu come mainly from the rural areas around the city. In this study, the lockdown period included the Chinese New Year holidays, so the return of large numbers of people to rural areas is likely to have led to an increase in BB particles. At the same time, the control of other particle sources during the lockdown period led to a further increase in the relative contribution of this type of particle.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of the contributions of various particles before and during the lockdown period.

3.2.2. Coal combustion (CC) particles

Coal combustion has been considered an important source of metal elements [such as copper (Cu), iron (Fe) and lead (Pb)] in the atmosphere (Liu et al., 2018a; Tian et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2018). Meanwhile, organic matter (OM) and elemental carbon (EC) are important products of coal combustion. Accordingly, the mass spectrum of CC particles in this study included metal element (such as 56[Fe]+, 63[Cu]+ and 206/207/208[Pb]+) and OM (38[C3H2]+, 43[C2H3O]+) peaks in the positive mass spectrum and EC (−24[C2], −36[C3] and −48[C4]) peaks in the negative mass spectrum. The strong peaks of secondary inorganic species, such as −46[NO2], −62[NO3] and −97[HSO4], suggest that this type of particle experienced long-distance transport. This is consistent with the fact that industries that use coal in large quantities are usually located in the areas surrounding Chengdu and other industrial cities. As shown in Fig. 3, the contribution of CC particles decreased by only 1.9% from the period before to the period during lockdown, which is far lower than the decrease in VE particles (by 14.9%; see section 3.2.3). This is consistent with the fact that, although most industries shut down during the lockdown period, some mainstay sectors related to the maintenance of everyday life and society were still operating.

3.2.3. Vehicle emissions (VE) particles

Consistent with the characteristics of VE particles in previous studies (Xia and Gao, 2011; Yao et al., 2016), the mass spectrum of VE particles in this study contained high loadings of OM (41[C3H5]+, 43[C2H3O]+) and EC (24[C2]±, 36[C3]±, 48[C4]± and 60[C5]±) ion peaks. Most source apportionment studies have pointed out that vehicle emissions are a major source of fine particles in China, especially in urban areas, where the number of vehicles is growing rapidly (Liu et al., 2018b; Peng et al., 2016). In this study, VE particles accounted for 20.1% of the total number of particles over the whole study period. Compared with the period before lockdown (27.6%), the proportion of VE particles decreased by 14.9% during the lockdown period (12.7%). This is consistent with the fact that people were restricted from going out and the number of vehicles on the road decreased significantly during the lockdown period.

3.2.4. Cooking emissions (CE) particles

Cooking emissions are an important source of primary organic aerosols in urban regions (Crippa et al., 2013). For example, Zhang et al. (2016) found that cooking emissions organic aerosol accounted for 23% of all organic aerosols in autumn in Beijing, and their contribution increased further when other sources were limited. In this study, the positive mass spectrum of CE particles contained OM ions, such as 41[C3H5]+ and 55[C4H7]+. Meanwhile, peaks at −255[C16H32O2 (palmitic acid)] and −281[C17H34O2 (oleic acid)], reported by Wang et al. (2020b) to be tracers of cooking emission sources, could clearly be found in the negative spectrum. During the entire study period, CE particles accounted for 10.7% of total particles. From the period before to the period during lockdown, their contribution increased significantly from 7.3% to 14.6%. This is because, before lockdown, a large number of people—especially office workers—would choose to eat together in restaurants. According to China's requirements for the management of pollutant emissions in catering enterprises, most enterprises have installed cooking emission fume filtering systems, so cooking emission pollutants have been reduced effectively. However, during the lockdown period, all restaurants were closed and citizens were restricted from going out. Thus, almost all citizens had to choose family meals over eating out, and the pollutants emitted from the increased level of home cooking were discharged into the atmosphere with almost no treatment measures, which led to a significant increase in the emissions of CE particles during the lockdown period.

3.2.5. Dust particles

The average mass spectra of Dust particles in this study were characterized by intense ion peaks of soil dust tracer, i.e., 40[Ca]+ (Luo et al., 2019). Meanwhile, there were obvious contributions from nitrate ions, such as −46[NO2] and −62[NO3] in the negative spectrum. This mass spectrum is consistent with those previously reported for Dust particles in Chengdu (Luo et al., 2019) and Beijing (Liu et al., 2016). Compared to the period before lockdown, the contribution of Dust particles decreased by 2.5% during the lockdown period, which is consistent with the fact that construction activities in the city stopped completely and road dust was reduced during this period.

3.2.6. Secondary inorganic particles

There were three types of secondary inorganic particles in this study. As shown in Fig. 2, their positive mass spectra were similar, i.e., dominated by 39[K]+. The differences mainly appeared in the negative mass spectra. The ions in the negative mass spectra of K–NO3 and K–SO4 particles were dominated by nitrate (−46[NO2], −62[NO3]) and sulfate (−97[HSO4]) ions, respectively. While the nitrate (−46[NO2], −62[NO3]) and sulfate (−97[HSO4]) ions jointly dominated the negative mass spectrum of K-SN particles (Xu et al., 2018a; Yang et al., 2017; Zheng et al., 2020). These three types of particles have also been found in summer (Zhang et al., 2017) and autumn (Zhang et al., 2018) in Chengdu and in winter in Xi'an (Li et al., 2019).

Over the whole study period, K–NO3, K–SO4 and K-SN particles constituted 21.7%, 3.5% and 23.8% of total analyzed particles, respectively. It is well known that nitrate and sulfate in atmospheric particles are produced mainly by the homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions of their gaseous precursors (NOx and SO2) (He et al., 2014). Meanwhile, the three types of secondary inorganic particles are the products of nitrate and sulfate mixed with other types of particles in the atmosphere. Therefore, the low contribution of K–SO4 particles may have been determined by the low level of SO2 (4.5 ± 5.6 μg m−3) in Chengdu. In contrast, the high contribution of K–NO3 particles is consistent with the high level of NOx over recent years, which is mainly related to the increasing number of vehicles. According to the China Mobile Source Environmental Management Annual Report (2020), the number of vehicle in Chengdu, the second largest city in China after Beijing, reached 5.2 million. From the period before to the period during lockdown, the contribution of K–NO3 decreased by 3.2%, which is related mainly to the significant reduction in the number of vehicles on the road during the lockdown period. In contrast, for the two types of sulfate-containing particles, K–SO4 and K-SN particles, their contributions increased by 2.7% and 5.4%, respectively. This may have been due to the lower reduction in SO2 (compared with NOx) during the lockdown period. At the same time, the increase in O3 was more conducive to the homogeneous formation of sulfate.

3.3. Particle compositions in different pollution episodes

It can be seen from Fig. 1 that, before the COVID-19 lockdown, the mass concentration of PM2.5 was at a high level, and two obvious pollution episodes occurred on January 17–18 and 20–23. The average concentrations of PM2.5 in the two episodes reached 68.3 ± 7.4 μg m−3 and 102.3 ± 12.9 μg m−3, respectively. After the beginning of lockdown, the concentration of PM2.5 decreased significantly, but there were three obvious pollution episodes in early February (5, 7–8 and 12–14), and the average concentrations of PM2.5 were 59.4 ± 20.4 μg m−3, 43.9 ± 2.5 μg m−3 and 83.9 ± 13.9 μg m−3, respectively. Because anthropogenic sources have been the focus of all kinds of pollution reduction measures in the past few years in China, the pollution characteristics during the lockdown period might just reflect the scenario where some important anthropogenic sources underwent substantial emission reductions. Thus, a study of the pollution episode during the lockdown period could reflect the pollution characteristics that we may face in the future. This could provide a reference for future pollution reduction and treatment. Therefore, in this section we compared the characteristics of a typical pollution episode occurring before (January 20–23, EP1) and during (February 12–14, EP2) the lockdown period, and the average composition throughout the study period.

As shown in Fig. 4 , there were obvious differences in the compositions of particles in the three periods. Compared to the whole study period, the total contributions of the three kinds of secondary inorganic particles (i.e., K–NO3, K–SO4 and K-SN particles) all increased during EP1 and their total contribution increased from 49.0% to 60.7%. According to previous studies, secondary inorganic particles experience long-term aging in the atmosphere, and regional transmission makes an important contribution to the increase in the contribution of these particles in Chengdu (Huang et al., 2018; Luo et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2019). Meanwhile, the contribution of CC particles, which are transmitted mainly from the industrial areas around Chengdu or other industrial cities in Sichuan province, increased by 1.4%. In contrast, the contributions of particles that come mainly from local emissions, such as VE and CE particles, all decreased. This suggests that the pollution episode that occurred before lockdown was caused mainly by regional transmission. This is consistent with the formation of a typical pollution process reported in a previous study in Chengdu (Zhang et al., 2021).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Particle compositions during EP1, EP2 and over the whole study period.

Compared with the whole study period, the trend in the change in secondary inorganic particles in EP2 was completely opposite to that in EP1, and their total contribution decreased by 8.1%. In particular, the contribution of K–NO3 particles decreased by 5.3%. However, the contributions of BB particles from rural areas around Chengdu and CE particles from Chengdu city increased by 7.2% and 5.7%, respectively. Meanwhile, we found that, although the contribution of VE particles (16.1%) during EP2 was lower than the average contribution over the whole study period (20.1%), it was 3.4% higher than the average contribution during the lockdown period (12.7%). Therefore, VE particles also made an important contribution to the formation of EP2. Thus, we can conclude that EP2 was caused mainly by biomass burning around Chengdu and local emissions (such as cooking and vehicle emissions) in Chengdu.

3.4. Weighted potential source contribution function (WPSCF) analysis

In order to explore the differences in potential source areas of air pollutants in Chengdu before and during COVID-19 lockdown in Chengdu, the WPSCF was used to simulate the source probability distribution of PM2.5 and some single particle types in different periods. Here, in addition to the two pollution episodes occurring before and during the lockdown periods (i.e., EP1 and EP2), one period with a low PM2.5 mass concentration (January 31 to February 3, when the average concentration was 34.6 ± 4.4 μg m−3, referred to as the “clean period”) was also selected for a comparison of potential source areas. Meanwhile, in addition to the PM2.5 mass concentration and total particle number concentration (“Total”), one typical regional transmission particle type (i.e., K–SO4 particles) and one typical local emitted particle type (i.e., VE particles) were selected for the WPSCF analysis, so as to obtain more comprehensive results for potential source differences.

As shown in Fig. 5 , the potential source areas of various pollutants (PM2.5, “Total”, K–SO4 and VE particles) in the three periods (clean, EP1 and EP2) had obvious differences. During the clean period, the potential sources of PM2.5 were distributed mainly in the area to the east of Chengdu, and the corresponding WPSCF value was low (<0.5), which means that the contribution of regional transmission to PM2.5 in Chengdu was low during this period, and PM2.5 in Chengdu came mainly from local emissions. There was good consistency in the potential source areas of “Total” and K–SO4 particles, which were concentrated mainly in the areas to the east and south of Chengdu. Although the potential source area in the south was much smaller than that in the easterly direction, the WPSCF value was much higher than that in the eastern area. Meanwhile, the potential source area in the eastern area for “Total” and K–SO4 particles was larger than that in the eastern area for PM2.5. Although the potential source areas of VE particles were also located in the areas to the east and south of Chengdu, their potential source areas were significantly smaller than those of the other two types of particles (especially in the easterly direction).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Spatial distributions of potential sources areas of PM2.5 and typical single particle types in different periods.

As mentioned above (section 3.3), EP1 was the pollution episode with the highest mean value of PM2.5 and it had a long duration during the whole study period. Therefore, it can easily be found that the potential source areas were more complex than in the other two periods, and the areas with high WPSCF values (>0.7) were widely distributed in the areas surrounding Chengdu. As shown in Fig. 5, the areas with high WPSCF values for PM2.5 were distributed mainly in the areas surrounding Chengdu and in the areas to the northeast and southeast of Chengdu. At the same time, there were areas with obviously high WPSCF values located in the transition area between Sichuan province and Chongqing. The potential source areas of “Total” particles during EP1 were distributed mainly in the area to the northeast of Chengdu, and the areas with high WPSCF values were close to Chengdu. Similar to PM2.5, the potential source areas of K–SO4 particles were distributed mainly in the areas to the northeast and southeast of Chengdu and the junction area of Sichuan province and Chongqing, showing obvious regional transmission characteristics, but the intensity of its WPSCF was far weaker than for PM2.5. The potential source area of VE particles was the smallest of all pollutants, and its high WPSCF values were concentrated mainly in the areas surrounding Chengdu, which is consistent with the fact that this type of particle comes mainly from vehicle emissions in Chengdu and surrounding areas. According to previous studies, in the many cities located in the areas to the east and south of Chengdu (such as Deyang, Mianyang, Guangan, Chongqing and Zigong), the pollutants they produced will cause the formation of pollution in Chengdu through air mass transport (Li et al., 2017). At the same time, a study by Huang et al. (2019) also found that these areas are important potential sources of PM2.5 in Chengdu, which is consistent with the results of potential source analysis during EP1 in this study.

Unlike the two periods before the COVID-19 lockdown, during EP2 the area to the east of Chengdu contributed little to pollution, and its potential source areas were distributed mainly in the area to the west of Chengdu. Except for PM2.5, the WPSCF values of the potential source areas of other pollutants were at a low level. This means that the pollution episode occurring during the lockdown period was caused mainly by local emissions in Chengdu.

On the whole, regional transmission contributed significantly to the pollution episode before lockdown and the potential source areas were distributed mainly in areas to the northeast and/or southeast of Chengdu. Whereas, during the clean period, the high WPSCF values were concentrated mainly in the area to the south of Chengdu. However, great changes took place during the lockdown period, and the potential source areas during EP2 were distributed mainly in the area to the west of Chengdu and the WPSCF intensity was far lower than during EP1, which means that the pollution episode during the lockdown period was caused mainly by local emissions. This is consistent with the formation mechanisms of the two pollution episodes we analyzed in section 3.3. On the other hand, although the directions of the potential source areas of different pollutants in the same period were similar, the intensity of their WPSCF values was different due to differences in emission sources or formation mechanisms; for example, the potential source area of K–SO4 particles was much larger than that of VE particles.

4. Conclusions

After the outbreak of COVID-19, a rigorous lockdown was implemented in China in order to prevent its spread. While effectively controlling the spread of the epidemic, the lockdown also significantly affected air quality. In this study, we measured single aerosol particles in Chengdu, one of the megacities in southwest China, before and during the lockdown period and found that the concentrations of most pollutants (PM2.5, NO, NO2, SO2 and CO) decreased, except for O3, from the period before to the period during lockdown. All the single particles could be divided into eight categories: BB, CC, VE, CE, Dust, K–NO3, K–SO4 and K-SN particles. Compared to the period before lockdown, the contribution of VE particles experienced the largest reduction (14.9%), whereas the contributions of BB and CE particles increased by 7.0% and 7.3%, respectively, during the lockdown period. A further comparison found that regional transmission played an important role in the formation of pollution before lockdown, while pollution during lockdown was contributed mainly by local emissions, which is consistent with the results from WPSCF analysis. In addition, although the directions of the potential source areas of different pollutants in the same period were similar, the intensity of their WPSCF values was different due to differences in emission sources or formation mechanisms.

Data availability

The data in this study are available from the authors upon request (ruizhao@swjtu.edu.cn).

Author contributions

J. K. Zhang and R. Zhao designed the research. J. K. Zhang, H. Li, L. Y. Chen and W. Zhang conducted the experiments. J. K. Zhang, H. Li and X. J. Huang analyzed the data. J. K. Zhang, H. Li and R. Zhao wrote the paper. J. K. Zhang and R. Zhao reviewed and commented on the paper.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Plan for Research and Development of China (No.2019YFC1905600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41805095) and the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2019YFS0476). We gratefully acknowledge the support from the Sichuan comprehensive monitoring station for environmental air quality.

References

  1. Benchrif A., Wheida A., Tahri M., Shubbar R.M., Biswas B. Air quality during three covid-19 lockdown phases: AQI, PM2.5 and NO2 assessment in cities with more than 1 million inhabitants. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021;74:103170. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berman J.D., Ebisu K. Changes in U.S. air pollution during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;739:139864. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bi X., Zhang G., Li L., Wang X., Li M., Sheng G., Fu J., Zhou Z. Mixing state of biomass burning particles by single particle aerosol mass spectrometer in the urban area of PRD, China. Atmos. Environ. 2011;45:3447–3453. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang Y., Huang R.J., Ge X., Huang X., Hu J., Duan Y., Zou Z., Liu X., Lehmann M.F. Puzzling haze events in China during the coronavirus (COVID-19) Shutdown. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020;47 doi: 10.1029/2020GL088533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Y., Wenger J.C., Yang F., Cao J., Huang R., Shi G., Zhang S., Tian M., Wang H. Source characterization of urban particles from meat smoking activities in Chongqing, China using single particle aerosol mass spectrometry. Environ. Pollut. 2017;228:92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chu B., Zhang S., Liu J., Ma Q., He H. Significant concurrent decrease in PM2.5 and NO2 concentrations in China during COVID-19 epidemic. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2021;99:346–353. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.06.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crippa M., DeCarlo P.F., Slowik J.G., Mohr C., Heringa M.F., Chirico R., Poulain L., Freutel F., Sciare J., Cozic J., Di Marco C.F., Elsasser M., Nicolas J.B., Marchand N., Abidi E., Wiedensohler A., Drewnick F., Schneider J., Borrmann S., Nemitz E., Zimmermann R., Jaffrezo J.L., Prévôt A.S.H., Baltensperger U. Wintertime aerosol chemical composition and source apportionment of the organic fraction in the metropolitan area of Paris. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013;13:961–981. [Google Scholar]
  8. Deng F., Zhang H., Ma X., Liang X. Research on the changes of air quality in Chengdu during the COVID-19 pandemic. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021;647 [Google Scholar]
  9. Draxler R., Stunder B., Rolph G., Stein A., Taylor A. 2009. HYSPLIT4 USER's GUIDE.http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php [Google Scholar]
  10. Dumka U.C., Tiwari S., Kaskaoutis D.G., Soni V.K., Safai P.D., Attri S.D. Aerosol and pollutant characteristics in Delhi during a winter research campaign. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019;26:3771–3794. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3885-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fan H., Wang Y., Zhao C., Yang Y., Yang X., Sun Y., Jiang S. The role of primary emission and transboundary transport in the air quality changes during and after the COVID-19 lockdown in China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2021;48 doi: 10.1029/2020GL091065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao C., Zhang X., Wang W., Xiu A., Tong D., Chen W. Spatiotemporal distribution of satellite-retrieved ground-level PM2.5 and near real-time daily retrieval algorithm development in Sichuan Basin, China. Atmosphere. 2018;9:78. [Google Scholar]
  13. He H., Wang Y., Ma Q., Ma J., Chu B., Ji D., Tang G., Liu C., Zhang H., Hao J. Mineral dust and NOx promote the conversion of SO2 to sulfate in heavy pollution days. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:4172. doi: 10.1038/srep04172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hopke P.K., Song X.H. Classification of single particles by neural networks based on the computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy data. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1997;348:375–388. [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang X., Ding A., Gao J., Zheng B., Zhou D., Qi X., Tang R., Wang J., Ren C., Nie W., Chi X., Xu Z., Chen L., Li Y., Che F., Pang N., Wang H., Tong D., Qin W., Cheng W., Liu W., Fu Q., Liu B., Chai F., Davis S.J., Zhang Q., He K. Enhanced secondary pollution offset reduction of primary emissions during COVID-19 lockdown in China. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020;8:nwaa137. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang X., Zhang J., Luo B., Luo J., Zhang W., Rao Z. Characterization of oxalic acid-containing particles in summer and winter seasons in Chengdu, China. Atmos. Environ. 2019;198:133–141. [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang X., Zhang J., Luo B., Wang L., Tang G., Liu Z., Song H., Zhang W., Yuan L., Wang Y. Water-soluble ions in PM2.5 during spring haze and dust periods in Chengdu, China: variations, nitrate formation and potential source areas. Environ. Pollut. 2018;243:1740–1749. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ji D., Gao W., Zhang J., Morino Y., Zhou L., Yu P., Li Y., Sun J., Ge B., Tang G., Sun Y., Wang Y. Investigating the evolution of summertime secondary atmospheric pollutants in urban Beijing. Sci. Total Environ. 2016;572:289–300. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li L., Huang Z., Dong J., Li M., Gao W., Nian H., Fu Z., Zhang G., Bi X., Cheng P., Zhou Z. Real time bipolar time-of-flight mass spectrometer for analyzing single aerosol particles. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2011;303:118–124. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li L., Li Q., Huang L., Wang Q., Zhu A., Xu J., Liu Z., Li H., Shi L., Li R., Azari M., Wang Y., Zhang X., Liu Z., Zhu Y., Zhang K., Xue S., Ooi M.C.G., Zhang D., Chan A. Air quality changes during the COVID-19 lockdown over the Yangtze River Delta Region: an insight into the impact of human activity pattern changes on air pollution variation. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;732:139282. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li L., Tan Q., Zhang Y., Feng M., Qu Y., An J., Liu X. Characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 during persistent extreme haze events in Chengdu, southwest China. Environ. Pollut. 2017;230:718–729. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li L., Wang Q., Zhang X., She Y., Zhou J., Chen Y., Wang P., Liu S., Zhang T., Dai W., Han Y., Cao J. Characteristics of single atmospheric particles in a heavily polluted urban area of China: size distributions and mixing states. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019;26:11730–11742. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04579-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu L., Zhang J., Du R.G., Teng X.M., Hu R., Yuan Q., Tang S.S., Ren C.H., Huang X., Xu L., Zhang Y.X., Zhang X.Y., Song C.B., Liu B.W., Lu G., Shi Z.B., Li W.J. Chemistry of atmospheric fine particles during the COVID-19 pandemic in a megacity of eastern China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2021;48 doi: 10.1029/2020GL091611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu B., Cheng Y., Zhou M., Liang D., Dai Q., Wang L., Jin W., Zhang L., Ren Y., Zhou J., Dai C., Xu J., Wang J., Feng Y., Zhang Y. Effectiveness evaluation of temporary emission control action in 2016 in winter in Shijiazhuang, China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018;18:7019–7039. [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu L., Wang Y., Du S., Zhang W., Hou L., Vedal S., Han B., Yang W., Chen M., Bai Z. Characteristics of atmospheric single particles during haze periods in a typical urban area of Beijing: a case study in October, 2014. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2016;40:145–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu W., Xu Y., Liu W., Liu Q., Yu S., Liu Y., Wang X., Tao S. Oxidative potential of ambient PM2.5 in the coastal cities of the Bohai Sea, northern China: seasonal variation and source apportionment. Environ. Pollut. 2018;236:514–528. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu Y., Song M., Liu X., Zhang Y., Hui L., Kong L., Zhang Y., Zhang C., Qu Y., An J., Ma D., Tan Q., Feng M. Characterization and sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and their related changes during ozone pollution days in 2016 in Beijing, China. Environ. Pollut. 2020;257:113599. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Luo J., Huang X., Zhang J., Luo B., Zhang W., Song H. Characterization of aerosol particles during the most polluted season (winter) in urban Chengdu (China) by single-particle analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019;26:17685–17695. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05156-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Luo J., Zhang J., Huang X., Liu Q., Luo B., Zhang W., Rao Z., Yu Y. Characteristics, evolution, and regional differences of biomass burning particles in the Sichuan Basin, China. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2020;89:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2019.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Menut L., Bessagnet B., Siour G., Mailler S., Pennel R., Cholakian A. Impact of lockdown measures to combat Covid-19 on air quality over western Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;741:140426. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Peng X., Shi G.L., Gao J., Liu J.Y., HuangFu Y.Q., Ma T., Wang H.T., Zhang Y.C., Wang H., Li H., Ivey C.E., Feng Y.C. Characteristics and sensitivity analysis of multiple-time-resolved source patterns of PM2.5 with real time data using Multilinear Engine 2. Atmos. Environ. 2016;139:113–121. [Google Scholar]
  32. Polissar A.V., Hopke P.K., Paatero P., Kaufmann Y.J., Hall D.K., Bodhaine B.A., Dutton E.G., Harris J.M. The aerosol at Barrow, Alaska: long-term trends and source locations. Atmos. Environ. 1999;33:2441–2458. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sharma S., Zhang M., Anshika Gao J., Zhang H., Kota S.H. Effect of restricted emissions during COVID-19 on air quality in India. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;728:138878. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sicard P., De Marco A., Agathokleous E., Feng Z., Xu X., Paoletti E., Rodriguez J.J.D., Calatayud V. Amplified ozone pollution in cities during the COVID-19 lockdown. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;735:139542. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Song X.H., Hopke P.K. Classification of single particles analyzed by ATOFMS using an artificial neural network, ART-2A. Anal. Chem. 1999;71:860–865. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sun Y., Lei L., Zhou W., Chen C., He Y., Sun J., Li Z., Xu W., Wang Q., Ji D., Fu P., Wang Z., Worsnop D.R. A chemical cocktail during the COVID-19 outbreak in Beijing, China: insights from six-year aerosol particle composition measurements during the Chinese New Year holiday. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;742:140739. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tian H.Z., Zhu C.Y., Gao J.J., Cheng K., Hao J.M., Wang K., Hua S.B., Wang Y., Zhou J.R. Quantitative assessment of atmospheric emissions of toxic heavy metals from anthropogenic sources in China: historical trend, spatial distribution, uncertainties, and control policies. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015;15:10127–10147. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tobias A., Carnerero C., Reche C., Massague J., Via M., Minguillon M.C., Alastuey A., Querol X. Changes in air quality during the lockdown in Barcelona (Spain) one month into the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;726:138540. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang H., Miao Q., Shen L., Yang Q., Wu Y., Wei H., Yin Y., Zhao T., Zhu B., Lu W. Characterization of the aerosol chemical composition during the COVID-19 lockdown period in Suzhou in the Yangtze River Delta, China. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2021;102:110–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang H., Zhu B., Zhang Z., An J., Shen L. Mixing state of individual carbonaceous particles during a severe haze episode in January 2013, Nanjing, China. Particuology. 2015;20:16–23. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang L., Liu Z., Sun Y., Ji D., Wang Y. Long-range transport and regional sources of PM2.5 in Beijing based on long-term observations from 2005 to 2010. Atmos. Res. 2015;157:37–48. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang M., Lu S., Shao M., Zeng L., Zheng J., Xie F., Lin H., Hu K., Lu X. Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on ambient levels and sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in Nanjing, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;757:143823. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang P., Chen K., Zhu S., Wang P., Zhang H. Severe air pollution events not avoided by reduced anthropogenic activities during COVID-19 outbreak. Resources, Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2020;158:104814. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang X., Ye X., Chen J., Wang X., Yang X., Fu T.-M., Zhu L., Liu C. Direct links between hygroscopicity and mixing state of ambient aerosols: estimating particle hygroscopicity from their single-particle mass spectra. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020;20:6273–6290. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang Y., Wen Y., Wang Y., Zhang S., Zhang K.M., Zheng H., Xing J., Wu Y., Hao J. Four-month changes in air quality during and after the COVID-19 lockdown in six megacities in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020;7:802–808. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang Y.Q., Zhang X.Y., Draxler R.R. TrajStat: GIS-based software that uses various trajectory statistical analysis methods to identify potential sources from long-term air pollution measurement data. Environ. Model. Software. 2009;24:938–939. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wu C.L., Wang H.W., Cai W.J., He H.D., Ni A.N., Peng Z.R. Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on roadside traffic-related air pollution in Shanghai, China. Build. Environ. 2021;194:107718. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu P., Huang X., Zhang J., Luo B., Luo J., Song H., Zhang W., Rao Z., Feng Y., Zhang J. Characteristics and formation mechanisms of autumn haze pollution in Chengdu based on high time-resolved water-soluble ion analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019;26:2649–2661. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3630-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Xia L., Gao Y. Characterization of trace elements in PM2.5 aerosols in the vicinity of highways in northeast New Jersey in the U.S. east coast. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2011;2:34–44. [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu J., Wang H., Li X., Li Y., Wen J., Zhang J., Shi X., Li M., Wang W., Shi G., Feng Y. Refined source apportionment of coal combustion sources by using single particle mass spectrometry. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;627:633–646. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu P., Zhang J., Ji D., Liu Z., Tang G., Jiang C., Wang Y. Characterization of submicron particles during autumn in Beijing, China. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2018;63:16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang J., Ma S., Gao B., Li X., Zhang Y., Cai J., Li M., Yao L.a., Huang B., Zheng M. Single particle mass spectral signatures from vehicle exhaust particles and the source apportionment of on-line PM2.5 by single particle aerosol mass spectrometry. Sci. Total Environ. 2017;593–594:310–318. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yao L., Yang L., Yuan Q., Yan C., Dong C., Meng C., Sui X., Yang F., Lu Y., Wang W. Sources apportionment of PM2.5 in a background site in the North China Plain. Sci. Total Environ. 2016;541:590–598. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang J., Cui K., Wang Y.F., Wu J.L., Huang W.S., Wan S., Xu K. Temporal variations in the air quality index and the impact of the COVID-19 event on air quality in western China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2020;20:1552–1568. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang J., Huang X., Wang Y., Luo B., Zhang J., Song H., Zhang W., Liu P., Schäfer K., Wang S., Luo J., Wu P. Characterization, mixing state, and evolution of single particles in a megacity of Sichuan Basin, southwest China. Atmos. Res. 2018;209:179–187. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang J., Huang X., Yu Y., Liu Q., Zhang J., Song H., Wang Y. Insights into the characteristics of aerosols using an integrated single particle–bulk chemical approach. Atmos. Res. 2021;250:105374. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang J., Luo B., Zhang J., Ouyang F., Song H., Liu P., Cao P., Schäfer K., Wang S., Huang X., Lin Y. Analysis of the characteristics of single atmospheric particles in Chengdu using single particle mass spectrometry. Atmos. Environ. 2017;157:91–100. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhang J.K., Wang L.L., Wang Y.H., Wang Y.S. Submicron aerosols during the Beijing Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation conference in 2014. Atmos. Environ. 2016;124:224–231. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhao N., Wang G., Li G., Lang J., Zhang H. Air pollution episodes during the COVID-19 outbreak in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region of China: an insight into the transport pathways and source distribution. Environ. Pollut. 2020;267:115617. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zheng H., Kong S., Chen N., Yan Y., Liu D., Zhu B., Xu K., Cao W., Ding Q., Lan B., Zhang Z., Zheng M., Fan Z., Cheng Y., Zheng S., Yao L., Bai Y., Zhao T., Qi S. Significant changes in the chemical compositions and sources of PM2.5 in Wuhan since the city lockdown as COVID-19. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;739:140000. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhou S., Davy P.K., Huang M., Duan J., Wang X., Fan Q., Chang M., Liu Y., Chen W., Xie S., Ancelet T., Trompetter W.J. High-resolution sampling and analysis of ambient particulate matter in the Pearl River Delta region of southern China: source apportionment and health risk implications. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018;18:2049–2064. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data in this study are available from the authors upon request (ruizhao@swjtu.edu.cn).


Articles from Atmospheric Environment (Oxford, England : 1994) are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES