Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Nov 6;130:105393. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105393

Parenting practices, stressors and parental concerns during COVID-19 in Pakistan

Naeem Zafar a,b,h,, Mehek Naeem a,b,h, Andleeb Zehra a,b, Tufail Muhammad c,h, Muhammad Sarfraz d, Haroon Hamid e, Kishwar Enam f, Muhammad Moaz a,c, Bawar Shah g, Sidra Ishaque f, Nazir Muhammad e
PMCID: PMC8576182  PMID: 34802747

Abstract

Background

COVID-19 is a global crisis that has added fear, uncertainty, and stress to parents. Parents are going through several challenges related to school closure, financial insecurity and working remotely. These stressors are affecting the mental health of parents.

Objectives

This study aimed to observe major stressors along with the impact of COVID-19 on parental concerns and practices during lockdown.

Participants

Sample (N = 923) was selected through purposive sampling from parents attending Out Patients Departments of hospitals in three provincial capital cities of Pakistan having a high burden of COVID-19, i.e. Lahore, Karachi and Peshawar. Parents having at least one child younger than 18 years were included in the study.

Methods

A quantitative design was used using a COVID-19 Parenting Response Scale (α = 0.74). It was used as a self-administered tool for parents who knew how to read and write Urdu/English language, however it was conducted as a structured interview for those who could not read/write. Data was analyzed by applying descriptive statistics (frequency, mean, percentage), independent sample t-test and Pearson Product Moment Correlation.

Results

Findings of the current study showed several stressful factors for parents during COVID-19 pandemic, mainly financial burden, children's education, uncertainty of the situation, and many others. The study also suggests an association of parental concerns during COVID-19 with parenting practices.

Conclusion

COVID-19 pandemic presents a global crisis not only of the health of the people but also on family relations and mental well-being. Findings of this research indicate the need for targeted and accessible interventions for mental health of parents especially during these challenging circumstances so that they can cope with the challenges in an effective way and be able to take care of their children better.

Keywords: COVID-19, Children, Parental mental health, Parenting practices

1. Introduction

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic extends far beyond the sphere of physical health. The pandemic is having profound effects on mental well-being, social development, safety, privacy, economic security, and family relationships. In this pandemic, children and adults are facing multiple challenges in their lives (Oliveira et al., 2021). The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the lives of millions of people around the world. Pakistan's first case was reported on 26th February 2020 and from then onwards, the situation has been volatile. To control the severity of pandemic, the government took substantial steps including lockdowns, school closures, market area restrictions and urged people to maintain social distancing, hand sanitization and use face masks (Mumtaz, 2020).

COVID-19 and the resulting lockdown may or may not be a severely taxing experience for every parent. Emotional regulation, coping mechanisms and resilience may buffer the impact on mental health issues (Herbert et al., 2020). The risk of suicide among parents increased as the psychosocial stressors and perception of burdensomeness increase (Crasta et al., 2020). A study investigating the immediate impact of COVID-19 on Italian parents and children showed that internalizing symptoms increased during COVID-19, especially during lockdown (Crescentini et al., 2020).

Mental health has never been a priority in Pakistan and issues surrounding stigma are deep rooted. It is estimated that out of a population of 180 million, over 20 million people already suffered from some form of mental disorder pre-COVID-19 (Nisar et al., 2019). With stressors on the rise, this number is only expected to increase (Mumtaz, 2020). Negative psychological impact has been found in healthcare workers (Arshad et al., 2020), individuals who are confined or visiting a high-risk viral load area for example mass public quarantines (Khan et al., 2020), and those who are at risk because of compulsory gatherings for example university students (Sattar, 2020).

One of the measures taken to combat the recent COVID-19 epidemic has been closure of schools. Ensuing home isolation and restricted activity of the entire family has increased stress among parents. While children struggle with their routines and family expectations, parents who are already worried due to job insecurity and difficulties in making ends meet, have an additional task of constant child supervision. Even though it is commonly believed that children are completely safe at home, they are sometimes at a greater risk for violence from parents and family members due to the dynamic of power and control interplay. Experts believe that COVID-19 will result in traumatic stress and increase mental health difficulties (Horesh & Brown, 2020). During COVID-19 parents experience burnout due to a high level of parenting-related stress and very few resources available. This may itself increase the risk of parental malpractices and child abuse and neglect. (Griffith, 2020). Stressors such as economic stress, marital conflicts, intimate personal violence, physical and mental health concerns, intensified relationships of child and parents, and home-schooling challenges are associated with an increase in child maltreatment (Wu & Xu, 2020). A study looking at high- and middle-income families with young children in Canada indicated that the key stressors included financial instability and work-life balance with homeschooling and childcare (Carroll et al., 2020).

Emergencies such as COVID-19 pandemic may adversely affect safety, health, and wellbeing of communities and individuals, which may translate into unhealthy behaviors and emotional reactions (Pfefferbaum & North, 2020). One or both of the parents losing a job is found to be a significant risk factor for maltreatment of children (Lawson et al., 2020). Social distancing, social isolation, stress and uncertainty are likely to increase child maltreatment in an already abusive home (Herbert et al., 2020). Increased stress of parents can affect parent-child relationships which in itself may increase the likelihood of the use of harsh parenting methods and risk of potential child abuse (Chung et al., 2020).

Negative strategies used by parents are associated with negative outcomes related to child's sleep, behavior, games and mental health (Oliveira et al., 2021). It is found that the potential for increased child abuse is associated with parental anxiety and depressive symptoms and decreases with parental support and perceived control during the pandemic (Brown et al., 2020).

This COVID-19 epidemic has a direct psycho-social impact on the child. A study in Japan, which looked at data from 5344 parents found that positive parenting behaviors such as empathizing with the child were reported among 80% of the parents. However, among the parents who reported abusive parenting behavior, it was associated with long hours of screen time (more than 6 h), domestic violence, and deteriorated mental health of mother (Yamaoka et al., 2021). Looking at databases of hospitals in France, a study found that there has been a significant increase in the expected number of cases of children who had been exposed to physical violence during COVID-19 lockdown period (Loiseau et al., 2021).

As the pandemic continues wave after wave, it is important to support children and adolescents facing bereavement and issues related to parental unemployment or loss of household income. There is also a need to monitor young people's mental health status in the long term, and to study how prolonged school closures, strict social distancing measures, and the pandemic itself affect the wellbeing of children and adolescents. (Herbert et al., 2020).

1.1. The current study

The conceptual framework of the current study is based on the family stress model (Conger et al., 1994). It describes that when caregivers experience high levels of stress, they are emotionally and mentally drained, hence making the task of positive leadership even more challenging. This may result in practicing less effective and negative parenting methods. (Prime et al., 2020). In the COVID-19 context, parents are dealing with multiple challenges simultaneously such as financial insecurity, situational uncertainty, and school closures etc. These challenges add greatly to parental stress and anxiety, which can ultimately affect parent-child relationships and jeopardize good parenting practices. Since the lockdown and isolation phenomenon was very new and the world was not ready for it, very little research has been conducted on its short-term and long-term effects on family lives globally and in Pakistan. The current study provides some insight into how the lives of children and parents have been affected due to this pandemic which is very critical to address at this time. As this crisis hampers daily life and functioning, it is also important to understand its consequences on family life particularly parents' mental well-being and parent child relationship in order to manage its negative short term and long-term effects.

The current research was designed to identify the lockdown related key parental stressors, assess parental concerns due to COVID-19 and understand the relationship between mental health and parenting practices. Based on these objectives, this study attempted to answer the following questions:

  • 1.

    What factors have added stress to parents during COVID-19 lockdown in Pakistan?

  • 2.

    What are the parental concerns during COVID-19 lockdown in Pakistan?

  • 3.

    Is there any relationship between the stressors and parental concerns during COVID-19?

  • 4.

    Is there any association between parental concerns and parenting practices during COVID-19?

2. Methods

2.1. Research design

The research design of the study was descriptive in nature and a quantitative approach was used through conducting a survey. Quantitative survey methods have been considered useful when researchers attempt to investigate attitudes and practices while sticking to the quantitative approach (Naeem et al., 2020).

2.2. Participants

Participants were recruited from parents visiting the pediatrics Out-Patient Department (OPD) of public and private hospitals in three provincial capitals of Pakistan i.e. Lahore, Karachi and Peshawar. These large cities had a high burden of COVID-19. These participants were visiting the out-patients for any reason including child's intercurrent illness, well baby visit or regular vaccination. All women and men, who were mother/father of at least one child under the age of 18 visiting the pediatric OPDs for any reason and who agreed to fill the questionnaire were included in the study through a purposive sampling technique. The sample size was 923. Initially, data was collected from 962 Participants (response rate = 96%) 39 participants were excluded due to incomplete/missing information. Sample characteristics have been shown in table A1.

2.3. Instrumentation and validation

A scale on parenting response during COVID-19 was developed by the researchers. The initial items pool was generated by reviewing available literature on parenting practices, parental concerns and stressors during COVID-19 lockdown. A focus group of parents was also conducted online to determine various stressors and parenting practices during COVID-19 lockdown. These items were presented to a team consisting of medical doctors, psychologists and research experts, and after consensus the items were finalized for each subscale of the instrument. The sub-scale of stressors included 14 statements while responses ranged from 1= “not at all stressful” to 4= “very much stressful”. The subscale of parental concerns due to COVID-19 consisted of 13 items and responses were rated from not relevant = 1 to very much relevant = 4 (reverse scoring of item number 1, 9 and 12), higher score shows higher parental concerns. The sub-scale of parenting practices consisted of 9 items on the scale of 1 to 4 where 1 = always and 4 = never (reverse scoring on items 6 and 9), higher score shows practice of more positive parenting.

Reliability was calculated through Cronbach's Alpha and its value was α = 0.74 for the overall instrument whereas α =0.70 for parental concerns subscale, α =0.76 for parenting practices subscale and α =0.80 for subscale of stressors.

2.4. Data analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated in the form of frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation. t-test and ANOVA were applied to investigate the differences in the parental concerns scores of the different groups on the basis of demographic characteristics. Correlation was applied to see if there was any relationship among parental concerns, stressors, and parenting practices during COVID-19 lockdown.

2.5. Procedure

The current study was conducted during the first peak of COVID-19 in Pakistan. Initial permission was granted by the ethical review board of King Edward Medical University Lahore and Agha Khan University Hospital Karachi. Permissions for data collection were then taken from Pediatric departments Mayo Hospital Lahore, Fauji Foundation Hospital Lahore, Govt. Women and Children Molvi Ameer Shah Memorial Hospital Peshawar and Dow University Hospital Karachi. Each hospital presented a focal person for correspondence with the research team. A team of data collectors from each hospital was trained for data collection through Zoom meetings. These teams consisted of doctors, nurses, and medical students from each hospital. Sample was selected through purposive sampling, inclusion criteria for the study were to include those visitors in the pediatric out-patient departments of the hospitals who were parents of at least one child and who were willing to take part in the study. Self-reported questionnaire was administered to the participants who were able to read and comprehend English/Urdu language, the data collection team conducted structured interviews for those who were not able to read. Average time of questionnaire completion was 15 min. After the completion of the survey from each city, data were entered, compiled, cleaned, and then analyzed by using SPSS version 21.0.

3. Results

Among 923 participants 318 (34.45%) were male and 605 (65.55%) were female. The average age of participants was 34 years (M = 34.19; SD = 8.03). 96.7% were married, 2.1% were widowed and 1.2% of the participants were divorced. Monthly household income of less than 20,000 PKR was reported by 24.2% of the participants, 37.2% reported 20,000 PKR to 40,000 PKR, 17.9% reported that they belonged to a monthly income group of 40,000 to 60,000 PKR. (USD 130, 260 and 390 per month respectively) whereas 20.7% reported monthly income above 60,000 PKR. Considering that in Pakistan middle income families can be loosely defined as a household having a household income of 50,000 PKR (USD 325 per month) (Adil, 2017), our sample primarily belonged to low or low middle-income group. Majority of the participants (64.7%) experienced loss in income due to COVID-19 (Table A1). In majority of the cases (71.2%) mothers have the primary responsibilities of taking care of the child. More than half of the participants (57.75%) reported that in their households, mothers help the children in their studies whereas 29.7% reported that fathers help the children in study (Table A2).

3.1. Stressors during COVID-19 lockdown

Uncertainty about the situation of COVID-19 was reported as a stressful indicator by the highest percentage of the respondents (83.8%). Continued updates on the media on COVID-19 situation and economic burden came out as the second highest reported stressful indicators (reported by 81.2% of the respondents). A large majority (79.9%) also reported being stuck indoors a stressful indicator, 79% considered unavailability of the desired products due to lockdown while 75% considered inability to go out and socialize stressful, during lockdown.

Other stressful indicators during COVID-19 lockdown reported by majority of the respondents include constant supervision of the children (74.6%), studies of children (74.4%), and lack of recreational activities (72.2%), see Table 1 .

Table 1.

Stressors during COVID-19 lockdown (N = 923).

Sr. no Indicators Not stressful
Stressful
Not applicable
Not at all stressful
Slightly stressful
Moderately stressful
Very much stressful
Total %
N % N % N % N % % n %
1 Uncertainty of the situation 130 14.1 199 21.6 287 31.1 287 31.1 83.8% 20 2.2
2 Continued updates on the situation from media 117 12.7 154 16.7 267 28.9 329 35.6 81.2% 56 6.1
3 Economic burden 141 15.3 169 18.3 209 22.6 372 40.3 81.2% 32 3.5
4 Getting stuck indoors 148 16.0 208 22.5 307 33.3 222 24.1 79.9% 38 4.1
5 Unavailability of the desired products due to lockdown 172 18.6 275 29.8 235 25.5 219 23.7 79% 22 2.4
6 Need to go out and/or socialize 148 16.0 191 20.7 253 27.4 248 26.9 75% 83 9.0
7 Constant supervision of the children 205 22.2 180 19.5 255 27.6 254 27.5 74.6% 29 3.1
8 Studies of children 159 17.2 248 26.9 182 19.7 257 27.8 74.4% 77 8.3
9 Lack of recreational activities 233 25.2 315 34.1 176 19.1 175 19.0 72.2% 24 2.6
10 Distribution of time among all the chores 217 23.5 194 21.0 299 32.4 142 15.4 68.8% 71 7.7
11 Inability to teach my child properly 299 32.4 157 17.0 156 16.9 224 24.3 58.2% 87 9.4
12 Lack of house help 149 16.1 144 15.6 226 24.5 162 17.6 57.7% 242 26.2
13 Unavailability of outside food 237 25.7 235 25.5 163 17.7 116 12.6 55.8% 172 18.6
14 Work from home 164 17.8 208 22.5 161 17.4 146 15.8 55.7% 244 26.4

3.2. Parental concerns due to COVID-19 lockdown

Table 2 presents frequency and percentage of the respondents regarding parental concerns during COVID-19 outbreak. Results indicate that many parents find relevance with the statements like “I fear, if my child remained behind in his studies”, “I feel, if we will not be able to get access to basic needs items in coming days”, “I sometimes feel trapped in the current circumstances of lockdown”, “I don't have any hope that our lives will ever become normal as they were before lockdown situation”, “I feel sad thinking that I cannot go out like I used to go before”.

Table 2.

Frequency and percentage of the respondents regarding parental concerns during COVID-19 (N = 923).

Statements Not relevant
Slightly relevant
Moderately relevant
Very much relevant
n % n % n % n %
I am happy that I get to spend more time with my family 245 26.5 334 36.2 191 20.7 153 16.6
I fear what if my child remained behind in his studies 200 21.6 273 29.6 247 26.8 203 22.0
I feel what if we will not be able to get access to basic needs items in coming days 178 19.3 383 41.5 232 25.1 130 14.1
I sometimes feel trapped in the current circumstances of lockdown 205 22.2 315 34.1 264 28.6 139 15.1
I feel that something awful is about to happen in near future 277 30.0 323 35.0 210 22.8 113 12.2
I don't have any hope that our lives will ever become normal as they were before the lockdown situation. 319 34.6 288 31.2 214 23.2 102 11.1
I want some time and space for myself without any other family member 369 40.0 321 34.8 145 15.7 88 9.5
I will lose my sanity if things remain same 424 45.9 252 27.3 163 17.7 84 9.1
I feel relaxed that I can accomplish things in my own way (house/work related) 353 38.2 325 35.2 156 16.9 89 9.6
I get frustrated while managing all the chores 317 34.3 329 35.6 191 20.7 86 9.3
I feel sad thinking that I cannot go out like I used to go before. 225 24.4 349 37.8 244 26.4 105 11.4
I take it as an opportunity to spend quality time with my child 292 31.6 311 33.7 186 20.2 134 14.5
I feel so anxious that I don't feel like taking care of my child 459 49.7 282 30.6 132 14.3 50 5.4

Pearson product moment correlation was used to find out the relationship of parental concerns and stressors during COVID-19. According to the findings, parental concerns are showing significant positive relationship with stressors i.e. studies of children r(921) = 0.37, p = .000; distribution of time among chores r(921) = 0.32, p = .000; work from home r(921) = 0.31, p = .000; need to go out r(921) = 0.19, p = .000; lack of house help r(921) = 0.26, p = .000; getting stuck indoors r(921) = 0.29, p = .000; inability to teach my child properly r(921) = 0.31, p = .000; unavailability of outside food r(921) = 0.19, p = .000; continued updates on the situation from media r(921) = 0.17, p = .000; economic burden r(921) = 0.24, p = .000; constant supervision of children r(921) = 0.32, p = .000; unavailability of desired products r(921) = 0.21, p = .000; lack of recreational activities r(921) = 0.28, p = .000; uncertainty to situation r(921) = 0.30, p = .000; and getting stuck indoors r(921) = 0.29, p = .000. It reflects that an increase in the level of stressors leads to higher parental concerns.

3.3. Differences in the mean scores of parental concerns based on sample characteristics (gender, income loss during COVID-19, family system, household income and age of the index child)

Table 3 presents differences in the mean scores of parental concerns during COVID-19 based on their gender, income loss during COVID-19 and family system. Mean values are shown for male (n = 318) and female (n = 605) participants as well as the results of t-tests (equal variance assumed) comparing the parameter estimates between the two groups. Results show a statistically significant difference in the parental concerns of males and females t (921) = −2.045, p = .041, d = 0.138. Mean scores are higher in the female participants (M = 2.32, SD = 0.44) than male participants (M = 2.26, SD = 0.43) whereas higher scores reflect higher parental concerns. It reflects that the females reported higher parental concerns during COVID-19 than males.

Table 3.

Mean and standard deviation of parental concerns scores during COVID-19 to compare groups based on gender, income loss and family system (N = 923).

Parameters Parental concerns
M SD t (921) P Cohen's d
Gender Male (n = 318) 2.26 0.43 −2.045 0.041 0.138
Female (n = 605) 2.32 0.44
Income loss during COVID-19 Participants who suffered loss in income during COVID-19 (n = 597) 2.36 0.44 4.823 0.000⁎⁎ 0.349
Participants who didn't suffer loss in income during COVID-19 (n = 326) 2.21 0.42
Family system Joint family system (n = 552) 2.32 0.44 2.017 0.044 0.136
Nuclear family system (n = 371) 2.26 0.44

p < .05.

⁎⁎

p < .001.

Results show a statistically significant difference in the parental concerns during COVID-19 of the participants who suffered from loss of income during COVID-19 and those who didn't face any loss in income t(921) = 4.823, p = 000, d = 0.349. Results indicate higher mean scores (M = 2.36, SD = 0.44) for the participants who faced loss in income during COVID-19 lockdown than those who didn't face any loss in the income (M = 2.21, SD = 0.42), whereas higher scores indicate higher parental concerns during COVID-19. It shows that participants who faced loss in income reported higher parental concerns during COVID-19 than those who had not faced loss in income (Table 3).

Results show a statistically significant difference in the parental concerns scores of the two groups living in joint (n = 552) and nuclear family systems (n = 371), t (921) = 2.017, p = 044, d = 0.136. Findings reflecting that the participants living in a joint family system reported higher parental concerns during COVID-19 than those living in a nuclear family system (Table 3).

Table 4 shows mean, standard deviation and the result of ANOVA to compare the parental concerns of different groups. Participants in the low-income group reflected higher parental concerns compared to those with relatively higher income. Mean scores are highest in the group where household income was less than 20,000PKR (about 129 USD) and lowest for the group where income was greater than 60,000 PKR (387USD) whereas higher the mean scores, higher the parental concerns. Value of F (3, 880) = 3.68, p = .012 is significant at α = 0.05. It shows there is a difference in the parental concerns scores of these groups. Post-Hoc test further shows that there is a significant difference between the mean scores of two groups having household income of less than 20,000 PKR and those having income of more than 60,000PKR with p = .021. Mean scores are higher for group having less than 20,000 PKR household income (M = 30.66, SD = 5.16) than the group having household income of more than 60,000 PKR (M = 28.91, SD = 6.51), whereas high mean scores in the parameter reflect higher parental concerns during COVID-19.

Table 4.

Mean, standard deviation and one-way analyses of variance to compare mean scores of parental concerns of groups based on household income during COVID-19 and age of the Index Child (N = 923).

Parameters Parental concerns
M SD F(3,919) P η2
Household income <20,000 PKR (n = 223) 30.66 5.16 3.680 0.012 0.012
20,000 to 40,000 PKR(n = 343) 30.23 5.36
>40,000 to 60,000 PKR (n = 166) 29.65 6.17
>60,000 PKR (n = 191) 28.91 6.51
Age of the index child Below 5 years (n = 411) 29.35 5.61 3.06 0.027 0.010
5-8 years (n = 226) 30.69 6.06
9–12 years (n = 192) 30.27 5.33
13 to 18 (n = 94) 29.99 5.55

p < .05.

Table 4 shows that parental concerns were higher where the age of the index child is between 5 and 8 years and lowest in the group where age of the index child is below 5 years. Value of F (3, 919) =3.06, p = .027 is significant at α = 0.05. Post-Hoc test further shows that there is a significant difference between the mean scores of two groups who reported age of the index child below 5 years and 5–8 years with p = .041. Mean scores are higher for group who have index child between 5 and 8 years of age (M = 30.69, SD = 6.06) than the group where age of the index child is below 5 years (M = 29.35, SD = 5.61) whereas high mean scores in the parameter reflect higher parental concerns.

3.4. Parenting practices during COVID-19 lockdown

Table 5 indicates parenting practices during COVID-19 lockdown. Parents reported positive as well as negative parenting practices during lockdown. Among the positive practices, 85.1% and 80.6% of the participants reported that they did various learning and fun activities respectively with their children. Among negative practices 76.9% reported that they get easily irritated when their children did not listen to them, 67.5% reported that their children did not listen to them unless they were being shouted at whereas 63.9% reported that they slapped their children if they misbehaved. More than half of the participants (59.3%) reported that it took so much yelling and cursing to make their children sit and do any work whereas 56.1% reported that without hitting/slapping it was impossible to make their children obey (Responses for always, mostly and sometimes have been combined here to indicate overall occurrence of a behavior, please see Table 5 for details).

Table 5.

Frequency and percentage of parenting practices during COVID-19 lockdown (N = 923).

Always Mostly Sometimes Total % of occurrence Never
I get easily irritated when my child doesn't listen to me 73(8.4) 210(24.2) 384 (44.3) 76.9% 199(23.0)
My child doesn't listen to me unless I shout at him 42(5.0) 171(20.3) 355(42.2) 67.5% 273(32.5)
I slap my child when he misbehaves. 29(3.4) 165(19.3) 353(41.2) 63.9% 309(36.1)
It takes so much yelling and cursing to make my child sit and do school's/any work 51(6.1) 160(19.3) 282(33.9) 59.3% 338(40.7)
Without slapping/hitting it is impossible to make my child obey me 61(7.3) 121(14.4) 289(34.4) 56.1% 368(43.9)
I get frustrated if my child asks so many questions 35(4.2) 121(14.4) 291(34.7) 53.3% 392(46.7)
When my child doesn't listen to me, I lock him in a room for a while so that he learns better 27(3.2) 94(11.0) 136(16.0) 30.2% 594(69.8)
My child and I do various learning activities together 173(20.5) 311(36.9) 233(27.7) 85.1% 125(14.8)
I love to do different fun activities with my child 200 (23.6) 277(32.7) 206(24.3) 80.6% 163(19.3)

3.5. Parenting practices and parental concerns during COVID-19

Pearson product moment correlation was used to investigate the relationship of parenting practices and parental concerns during COVID-19 lockdown. Findings indicate that parenting practices and parental concerns were significantly negatively correlated, r(921) = −0.29, p = .000, where higher scores in parenting practices represent positive practices and higher scores in parental concerns indicate higher parental concerns as per the scoring of respective parameters. Negative correlation between these two variables show that parents with higher parenting concerns reported negative parenting practices.

4. Discussion

COVID-19 can seriously affect the child and his/her family life. UNESCO reports 1.6 billion children out of school or childcare centers, leaving them deprived of group activities and sports (UNESCO, 2021). Parents and caregivers are struggling due to increased pressure of childcare responsibilities, uncertain situations and financial insecurity during the pandemic (Cluver et al., 2020; Kalil et al., 2020). Current study highlights various stressors affecting parents in Pakistan, a low middle-income country, along with the mental health of parents and how mental health is affecting parenting practices during COVID-19.

Uncertainty on the situation about COVID-19 was a major stressor for the parents. Continued updates from the media, economic burden, being stuck indoors, unavailability of the desired products due to lockdown and inability to go out and socialize were also reported major stressors by majority of the parents. Constant supervision of the children, studies of children and lack of recreational activities were the other factors increasing the stress in the parents. Hiraoka and Tomoda (2020) also reported an increased level of stress in the parents during COVID-19, their findings reflect that parenting stress was increased after the school closures than before the school closures.

Several researchers have reported increased levels of stress and mental health issues among parents during COVID-19, however intensity of the stressors has been different in each household which results in variable consequences (Evans et al., 2020; Janssen et al., 2020). Findings of the current study indicate that majority of the participants expressed concerns on how this pandemic will affect their child's education, fear of unavailability of basic needs, feeling of being trapped and not going out and wondering if lives would ever normalize again. Evans et al. (2020) also reported similar concerns by parents, such as children missing out on their education and absence of co-curricular and recreational activities for children.

Current study also indicates an association between relevance with the stressors during COVID-19 and parental concerns. It suggests that parents who perceive an increased level of stress due to COVID-19 lockdown reflect higher parental concerns. Janssen et al. (2020); Hiraoka and Tomoda (2020); Cluver et al. (2020) also strengthened the current findings through their studies and reported that higher stressors for the parents lead to their poor mental health and increased parental concerns. Janssen et al. (2020) reported uncertainty during the quarantine duration of the COVID-19 pandemic as a significant indicator to elevate the stress level of the parents.

The current study points out an important risk factor that increases the vulnerability of parents to higher parental concerns during COVID-19 pandemic. Results of this study reveal higher parental concerns for those who suffered from loss in income during COVID-19, furthermore, the current study also reveals differences in the scores of parental concerns among different family income subsets, indicating higher concerns in low-income families than those from low-middle income groups. Previous studies have also highlighted the relationship of financial difficulties and stress of the caregivers (Fuller-Thomson & Minkler, 2005; Kiely et al., 2015). Similar findings were reported by Kalil et al., 2020, indicating higher stress levels in parents with income loss. They also reported that it is the financial difficulty that caused stress in the parents instead of job loss, parents who lost their jobs but did not face financial difficulties were reported spending more quality time with their children. Xu et al. (2020) also reported an association between caregiver stress and material hardship. Tiwari et al. (2020) reported that consequences of COVID-19 lockdown were equally stressful for the mothers of joint and nuclear families however their coping strategies were different in both systems, however, findings of the current study indicate higher concerns of parents living in joint families than those in the nuclear family system. This dimension needs further exploration by future research.

Staying at home may have provided family members some extra time to spend with each other but it also came with increased burden of chores and responsibilities for the parents, especially the mothers (Russell et al., 2020). The findings of the current study reflected that in majority of the families, mothers were mainly responsible for taking care of children and helping them in their studies. This highlights another significant finding of the current study that mothers reported higher mean scores for parental concerns during COVID-19 than the fathers. Del Boca et al. (2020) shares similar empirical findings in their study, reflecting that COVID-19 resulted in increased childcare and household responsibilities in women as compared to their partners. Moreover, maintaining work-life balance proved to be more difficult for women than men, especially when their partners continued to work outside the home during COVID-19.

Parents reported that COVID-19 pandemic has adverse effects on their relationship with their children (Evans et al., 2020). Although the findings of the current study indicate a combination of positive and negative parenting practices during lockdown, parents with higher concerns during COVID-19 lockdown reported more negative parenting practices. These findings are consistent with research showing that environmental stressors and challenging events are associated with negative parenting practices (Conger et al., 2010) and with the findings of Borre and Kliewer (2014) who reported that parents suffering from stress and mental health issues find difficulties in parenting.

5. Conclusion and implications

COVID-19 pandemic presents a global crisis not only related to the health of people but also on family relations and mental well-being. Most of the studies have been conducted in the upper- and middle-income countries, and very few from lower and low-middle income group countries. Parenting issues in every country have been different and peculiar to its own culture (Brown et al., 2020) and we are presenting the challenges faced by low- and middle-income parents from Pakistan, which has otherwise tackled the problem of COVID-19 relatively well. The current study was an attempt to identify stressors faced by parents and parental concerns during this pandemic. As parental well-being greatly affects the quality of the parent-child relationships (Borre & Kliewer, 2014), this study also highlighted the association between parental concerns and parenting practices during COVID-19. Findings of the current study show several stressful factors for parents during COVID-19 pandemic, these primarily include financial burdens, education of children and uncertainty of the situation among many others. Study suggests an association between parental concerns and relevance with the stressors, indicating that higher the relevance with the stressors, higher the parental concerns. Findings show certain risk factors that make individuals/families more vulnerable to increased concerns during COVID-19. These risk factors include gender as mother showed increased concerns than fathers, socio-economic status as low-income group reflected higher parental concerns than with the high-income group and income loss during COVID-19 as participants from families that suffered from income loss during this pandemic presented higher concerns as compared to those who have not suffered from income loss. This study also highlights the association between parental concerns and parenting practices, indicating higher concerns lead to negative parenting practices. Findings of this research indicate the need for targeted and accessible interventions for mental wellbeing of the parents especially during these challenging circumstances so that parents can cope with the challenges in an effective way.

5.1. Strengths and limitations

Data for the current study was collected in 2 months, June 2020 to July 2020 during the first peak of COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan. It presents information from a larger sample size through in-person survey which might add value to the findings of the study as in the lockdown period there were not many options for in-person data collection. Hence, data were collected only from hospital outpatient departments which can be a limitation, but researchers included hospitals from both public and private sectors so that data can be collected from the participants with diverse backgrounds.

Grant support and financial disclosures

Partial support from Pakistan Pediatric Association Research Division.

Declaration of competing interest

No potential source of conflict of interest of any author.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the team of data collectors and their local supervisors without whose support the study would not have been possible.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105393.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary tables

mmc1.docx (34.3KB, docx)

References

  1. Adil A. Our middle class. 2017, June 15. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/210660-Our-middle-class
  2. Arshad M.S., Hussain I., Nafees M., Majeed A., Imran I., Saeed H., Rasool M.F. Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers in three metropolitan cities of Pakistan. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 2020;13:1047–1055. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S282069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borre A., Kliewer W. Parental strain, mental health problems, and parenting practices: A longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences. 2014;68:93–97. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown S.M., Doom J.R., Lechuga-Peña S., Watamura S.E., Koppels T. Stress and parenting during the global COVID-19 pandemic. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2020;110(2) doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carroll N., Sadowski A., Laila A., Hruska V., Nixon M., Ma D.W.L. The impact of COVID-19 on health behavior, stress, financial and food security among middle to high income Canadian families with young children. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2352. doi: 10.3390/nu12082352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chung G., Lanier P., Wong P.Y.J. Mediating effects of parental stress on harsh parenting and parent-child relationship during coronavirus (COVID-19) Journal of Family Violence. 2020:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10896-020-00200-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cluver L., Lachman J.M., Sherr L., Wessels I., Krug E., Rakotomalala S., McDonald K. Parenting in a time of COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395(10231) doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30736-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Conger R.D., Conger K.J., Martin M.J. Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 2010;72:685–704. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Conger R.D., Ge X., Elder G.H., Jr., Lorenz F.O., Simons R.L. Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents. Child Development. 1994;65(2):541–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00768.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Crasta D., Daks J.S., Rogge R.D. Modeling suicide risk among parents during the COVID-19 pandemic: Psychological inflexibility exacerbates the impact of COVID-19 stressors on interpersonal risk factors for suicide. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2020;18:117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crescentini C., Feruglio S., Matiz A., Paschetto A., Vidal E., Cogo P., Fabbro F. Stuck outside and inside: An exploratory study on the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak on Italian parents and children’s internalizing symptoms. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Del Boca D., Oggero N., Profeta P., Rossi M. Women’s and men’s work, housework and childcare, before and during COVID-19. Review of Economics of the Household. 2020;18(4):1001–1017. doi: 10.1007/s11150-020-09502-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Evans S., Mikocka-Walus A., Klas A., Olive L., Sciberras E., Karantzas G., Westrupp E.M. From ‘It has stopped our lives’ to ‘Spending more time together has strengthened bonds’: The varied experiences of Australian families during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:2906. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fuller-Thomson E., Minkler M. American Indian/Alaskan Native grandparents raising grandchildren: Findings from the Census 2000 supplementary survey. Social Work. 2005;50(2):131–139. doi: 10.1093/sw/50.2.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Griffith A.K. Parental burnout and child maltreatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Violence. 2020:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s10896-020-00172-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Herbert J.S., Mitchell A., Brentnall S.J., Bird A.L. Identifying rewards over difficulties buffers the impact of time in COVID-19 lockdown for parents in Australia. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:3441. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.606507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hiraoka D., Tomoda A. The relationship between parenting stress and school closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2020 doi: 10.1111/pcn.13088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Horesh D., Brown A.D. Traumatic stress in the age of COVID-19: A call to close critical gaps and adapt to new realities. Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy. 2020;12(4):331. doi: 10.1007/s10578-020-01037-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Janssen L.H., Kullberg M.L.J., Verkuil B., van Zwieten N., Wever M.C., van Houtum L.A.…Elzinga B.M. Does the COVID-19 pandemic impact parents’ and adolescents’ well-being? An EMA-study on daily affect and parenting. PLoS One. 2020;15(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kalil A., Mayer S., Shah R. 2020–139. University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper; 2020. Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on Family Dynamics in Economically Vulnerable Households. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Khan T., Qureshi M., Zahid M., Hussain E., Ashraf M., Channa A. The burden of quarantine on mental health amidst COVID-19 pandemic: a cross sectional study. PAFMJ. 2020;70(2):S584–S589. https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/5288 Retrieved from. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kiely K.M., Leach L.S., Olesen S.C., Butterworth P. How financial hardship is associated with the onset of mental health problems over time. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2015;50(6):909–918. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1027-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lawson M., Piel M.H., Simon M. Child maltreatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: consequences of parental job loss on psychological and physical abuse towards children. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2020;104709 doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Loiseau M., Cottenet J., Bechraoui-Quantin S., Gilard-Pioc S., Mikaeloff Y., Jollant F.…Quantin C. Physical abuse of young children during the COVID-19 pandemic: Alarming increase in the relative frequency of hospitalizations during the lockdown period. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2021;122(March) doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mumtaz M. COVID-19 and mental health challenges in Pakistan. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2020 doi: 10.1177/0020764020954487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Naeem M., Zehra A., Zafar N., Akram W., Ghani S. Understanding youth participation to volunteer for child rights. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2020;119(1) doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nisar M., Mohammad R.M., Fatima S., Shaikh P.R., Rehman M. Perceptions pertaining to clinical depression in Karachi, Pakistan. Cureus. 2019;11(7) doi: 10.7759/cureus.5094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Oliveira C., Alvim-Soares P., Kestelman S., Malloy-Diniz M. Children’s behavioral problems, screen time, and sleep problems’ association with negative and positive parenting strategies during the COVID-19 outbreak in Brazil. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2021;2021:105345. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105345. ISSN 0145-2134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pfefferbaum B., North C.S. Mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020 doi: 10.1056/nejmp2008017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Prime H., Wade M., Browne D.T. Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist. 2020;75(5):631–643. doi: 10.1037/amp0000660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Russell B.S., Hutchison M., Tambling R., Tomkunas A.J., Horton A.L. Initial challenges of caregiving during COVID-19: Caregiver burden, mental health, and the parent–child relationship. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. 2020;51(5):671–682. doi: 10.1007/s10578-020-01037-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sattar A. 2020. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health of university students in Pakistan. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tiwari G.K., Tiwari R.P., Pandey R., Ray B., Dwivedi A., Sharma D.N.…Tiwari A.K. Authorea Preprints; 2020. The life outcomes of children during COVID-19: Exploring the protective roles of the joint and nuclear families in India. [Google Scholar]
  34. UNESCO One year into COVID-19 education disruption: Where do we stand? 2021. https://en.unesco.org/news/one-year-covid-19-education-disruption-where-do-we-stand
  35. Wu Q., Xu Y. Parenting stress and risk of child maltreatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: A family stress theory-informed perspective. Developmental Child Welfare. 2020;2(3):180–196. doi: 10.1177/2516103220967937. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Xu Y., Wu Q., Levkoff S.E., Jedwab M. Material hardship and parenting stress among grandparent kinship providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of grandparents’ mental health. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2020;110 doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yamaoka Y., Hosozawa M., Sampei M., Sawada N., Okubo Y., Tanaka K.…Morisaki N. Abusive and positive parenting behavior in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic under the state of emergency. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2021;120(June) doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary tables

mmc1.docx (34.3KB, docx)

Articles from Child Abuse & Neglect are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES