Abstract

A new simple method for the synthesis of 2-ethynylphenyl(diaryl)phosphine oxides via ring opening of benzophosphol-3-yl triflates has been developed. This process occurs via nucleophilic attack of a Grignard reagent at the phosphorus center, which results in ring opening and cleavage of a leaving group. The reaction proceeds under mild conditions and, within 15–60 min, leads to a library of previously unavailable 2-ethynylphenylphosphine oxides in yields up to 98%.
Introduction
Compounds possessing an ethynyl fragment became an attractive pattern in modern organic chemistry.1 The growing importance of the chemistry of carbon–carbon triple bonds is due to their unique and diverse chemical reactivity and remarkable synthetic potential as they can be used as precursors for many classes of compounds including alkanes, alkenes, aldehydes, and carboxylic acids on both laboratory and industrial scales.1,2 Recently, ethynyl compounds have been intensively explored in catalytic reactions mediated by different metals (gold,3 copper,4 palladium,5 rhodium,6 and others7), providing various cyclic products. Moreover, ethynyl compounds have a wide range of applications in the synthesis of biologically active compounds and have been broadly exploited in drug discovery and development.8 Furthermore, an alkyne functionality is frequently used in medicine9 and chemical biology10 as a “click” probe to label or identify molecular targets and to assess target engagement. The “click-type” reactions of ethynyl compounds have also been exploited to synthesize π-conjugated macromolecules for organic electronics11 and other materials.12 On the other hand, ethynyl compounds themselves, especially those possessing expanded π-systems, have been involved in the preparation of organic structures for photo-optical purposes and others.13 All mentioned applications of alkynes benefit from the rapid development of the synthetic routes, enabling the incorporation of an ethynyl unit into the structure of nearly any organic molecule. The most explored methods here are Sonogashira coupling,14 copper-free Sonogashira reactions,15 and alkynylation reaction.16
In the field of organophosphorus chemistry, (ethynyl)phosphine oxides were employed in the preparations of so-called “smart” polymers17 but also as the starting materials for metal-catalyzed coupling,18 cyclization,19 cycloaddition,20 and radical addition/cycloaddition.21 Another class of organophosphorus-possessing C–C triple bond compounds mentioned in the literature is p-ethynylphenylphosphine oxides. Those compounds have found several applications in the construction of star-shaped fluorescent molecules,22 microporous organic polymers (MOPs),23 nanostructured carbon materials,24 and triazole precursors.25 Their ortho analogues with phosphorus at a lower oxidation state are typically used for the construction of the benzophosphole skeleton.26 The access to those derivatives was achieved via a reaction of o-lithiotolane with chlorophosphine (Scheme 1A).26e,27 A different route to these derivatives was completed through Sonogashira coupling.28 In 2020, Duan et al. showed that methyl(phenyl)phosphinic chloride in a reaction with lithium o-phenylethynylbenzene had provided o-phenylethynylphosphine oxide, which is immediately transformed into the corresponding benzophosphole oxide (Scheme 1B).29 Another compound possessing an ethynyl moiety in the ortho position was obtained via [2 + 2 + 2] cyclization (Scheme 1, C).30 To the best of our knowledge, the phosphine oxides possessing a terminal ethynyl moiety in the ortho position are unknown. The closest known analogues are derivatives of (o-ethynylphenyl)phosphonic acid synthesized by Ding31 and later Peng.32
Scheme 1. Examples of the Synthesis of 2-Ethynylphenylphosphine Derivatives.
Results and Discussion
Herein, we want to present a new route to 2-ethynylphenyl(diaryl)phosphine oxides via unprecedented ring opening of triflates derived from benzophospholan-3-one oxides.
We began our study with the preparation of a set of triflates 5 and 6 from benzophospholan-3-one oxides 3 and benzophospholan-3-one sulfide 4a (Scheme 2, path d). Benzophospholan-3-one oxides 3 and sulfide 4a, which were starting materials for triflates 5 and 6a, were prepared in a two-step procedure, utilizing Ullman type coupling of phosphine oxide 1 followed by cyclization in the presence of LDA (Scheme 2, paths a and b). The preparation of benzophosphole sulfide 4a was achieved via chemoselective reduction of P=O in 3 followed by oxidation of the phosphorus center with sulfur (Scheme 2, path c).
Scheme 2. Synthetic Route to Triflates 5 and 6.
Our primary synthetic goal was to investigate the reactivity of triflates 5 and 6a toward aryl Grignard reagents in order to prepare 3-arylbenzophosphole oxides 7 according to the reaction depicted in Scheme 3.
Scheme 3. Predicted Outcome of the Reaction of 5a with Aryl Grignard Reagents.

In order to check the reactivity of triflates toward the Grignard reagent, the model triflate 5a was reacted with p-tolylmagnesium bromide (Table 1). To our surprise, instead of the expected 1-phenyl-3-(p-tolyl)benzophosphole oxide (7a), we have observed compound 8a (as the major product), which, in most cases, remained in the mixture with diphosphorus compound 9 (Table 1, entries 1–5). We realized that the aryl Grignard reagent caused the ring opening of the starting triflate 5a, which resulted in the formation of phosphine oxide 8a bearing a 2-ethynylphenyl substituent. Therefore, we decided to focus on the selective transformation of triflates into phosphine oxides 8 possessing a terminal ethynyl group in the ortho position, which gives an opportunity for further functionalization.
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions in a Reaction of 5a and p-TolMgBra.
| entry | 5a/p-TolMgX (equiv) | temp (°C) | 8a (%)b | 9 (%)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1:1.1 | –78 | 36 | 29c |
| 2 | 1:1.1 | –25 | 71 | 17 |
| 3 | 1:1.1 | rt | 76 | 7 |
| 4 | 1:/1.1 | 0 | 65 | 10 |
| 5 | 1:1.8 | 0 | 83 | 10 |
| 6 | 1:2.5 | 0 | 83 | 0 |
| 7d | 1:1.5 | 0 | 98 | 0 |
Reaction conditions: 5a (0.13 mmol), ArMgBr (0.195 mmol), THF (2 mL).
Isolated yields.
Starting material 5a and 1-phenylbenzophospholan-3-one oxide (3a) were present in the crude reaction mixture.
Reaction was carried out for 30 min.
First, we screened the influence of the temperature on the reaction of triflate 5a with p-TolMgBr (Table 1, entries 1–4). Preliminary attempts showed that the selectivity of the reaction is significantly affected by temperature. When the reaction of 5a was carried out at −78 °C, a mixture of products was observed in the crude reaction mixture, and the conversion of 5a was not complete (Table 1, entry 1). The mixture consisted of 8a, 9, and unreacted 5a and was accompanied by 1-phenylbenzophospholan-3-one oxide (3a). We were able to isolate major product 8a along with diphosphorus compound 9 in 36% and 29% yields, respectively. Under these conditions, selectivity was low, and a relatively high amount of 9 was formed. The structure of compound 9 was confirmed by X-ray analysis (Figure 1). It turned out that compound 9 possesses an alkyne moiety directly connected with the phosphorus atom.
Figure 1.
Molecular structure of 9; ellipsoids 30%, hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity (except H35). Important bond distances (Å), angles (deg) for 9: P1–O1 1.488(2), P2–O2 1.482(2), C20–C21 1.202(4), C34–C35 1.205(6), C35–H35 0.950(2), O1–P1–C1 111.41(14), O1–P1–C8 113.03(15), O1–P1–C14 113.89(15), C20–C21–P2 168.8(3), O2–P2–C22 113.86(16), O2–P2–C28 115.37(15), C33–C34–C35 176.0(3).
Further attempts have revealed that the full conversion of 5a can be achieved by increasing the temperature (Table 1, entry 2). Additionally, the amount of 8a has significantly increased at −25 °C, 0 °C, and rt to 71, 65, and 76% isolated yields, respectively (Table 1, entries 2–4). However, some amounts of 9 have still been found in the reaction mixture and were isolated in 7–17% yields. To optimize the conditions, we decided to maintain the temperature of the reaction at 0 °C. A further study has shown that the change in the 5a/p-TolMgBr ratio strongly affected the outcome of the reaction (Table 1, entries 4–6). In the case where 5a was reacted with 2.5 equiv of the Grignard reagent, desired 8a was formed as a sole product isolated in 83% yield (Table 1, entry 6). Finally, the optimal reaction conditions were established by reducing the amount of p-TolMgBr and extending the reaction time (Table 1, entry 7). In this case, the complete conversion of 5a to 8a was observed, and 8a was isolated with the highest yield (98%).
In the next stage, the reactivity of triflate 5a toward a set of aryl Grignard reagents was checked under the optimized reaction conditions (Table 2). In general, triflate 5a was tolerant toward different substitution patterns in the aryl ring of the Grignard reagent used. In most cases, products 8a–k were obtained in good to very good yields. In the case of tolyl Grignard reagents, there was no difference between the reactivity of the p- and m-tolyl Grignard reagent, and both led to the formation of 8a and 8b in 98% and 84% yields, respectively. In sharp contrast to these reactions, the analogous reaction with o-TolMgCl was much less selective and resulted in a mixture of 8c and ketone 3a. In this case, product 8c was formed with the lowest yield (38%). Noteworthy, the reaction with p-TolMgBr on a higher scale (0.6 mmol) has also provided desired product 8a in a high yield (91%).
Table 2. Scope of Different ArMgBr Reagents in the Reaction with Triflate 5aa,b,c.
Reaction conditions: 5a (0.13 mmol), ArMgBr (0.195 mmol), THF (2 mL).
Isolated yields of product.
Numbers in parentheses indicate yields according to 31P NMR.
Reaction was carried out on a 0.6 mmol scale.
Reaction was carried out with o-TolMgCl.
Formation of a small amount of ketone 3a was observed but not isolated.
Additionally, 7% of 3a was isolated.
At the same time, the reactivity of triflate 5a toward the Grignard reagent possessing electro-donating substituents (anisylmagnesium bromides) was not greatly dependent on the position of the methoxyl group in the phenyl ring. The reactions of compound 5a with any isomer (o-, m-, p-) of anisylmagnesium bromide provided products 8d–f with 89–98% yields. Another Grignard reagent with an electron-donating substituent, p-Me2N–C6H4MgBr, in a reaction with 5a has provided a mixture of 8k and 3a, which was enriched in 8k. In this case, 8k and 3a were isolated in 60 and 7% yields, respectively.
Interestingly, even Grignard reagents possessing halogen atoms in the para position in the phenyl ring formed the desired products with a very high selectivity; however, isolated yields of 8i and 8j were slightly lower (82% yields for both reagents). In turn, a reaction of 5a under the same conditions with bulky 9-phenantrylmagnesium bromide has led to product 8h in 70% yield. Small amounts of other unidentified compounds were also observed but not isolated.
The results achieved for 5a (Table 2) have prompted us to further investigate the selectivity of this process by changing the substituents in compound 5. The obtained results are presented in Table 3. To our delight, once again, we were able to isolate the expected 2-ethynylphenyl(diaryl)phosphine oxides 10–12 in very good yields. In the case of compounds with electron-donating substituents in benzophosphole rings 5b and 5d, a reaction with PhMgBr afforded 10d and 12d in high yields −91 and 82%, respectively. Similar results were obtained when compound 5c possessing a chlorine substituent was subjected to the reaction with PhMgBr. Product 11d was successfully isolated in a 73% yield. Moreover, the reactions of 5b with other Grignard reagents (p-TolMgBr, p-AnMgBr, p-Cl–C6H4MgBr) provided 10–11a,e,i as the major products in the crude reaction mixture. Therefore, we assume that the studied reaction is tolerant toward differently substituted aryl Grignard reagents. Unfortunately, the isolation step was less successful in comparison to products formed in reactions with PhMgBr (10d, 11d, 12d). In these cases, we noted lower isolated yields in the range of 58–66%. Faster isolation of 10–12 (higher polarity of the eluent, short chromatography column) resulted in higher yields and moderate purity. In opposite, when compounds were eluted slower (lower polarity of eluent, longer chromatography column), higher purity was noted with a significant reduction of yield. For instance, when isolating 10a in a lower polarity solvent and a higher polarity solvent, we observed 38% and 66% yields, respectively. It seems that a terminal acetylene moiety can interact with acidic silica gel, which causes a decrease in yield. Unfortunately, some loss during isolation was also observed for products 10k, 11k, and 12k possessing an amino moiety. Even the addition of triethylamine to the eluent during the chromatography column was not beneficial, and all of these products were isolated in a moderate yield, 60–70%.
Table 3. Reactivity of Substituted Benzophosphole Oxides 5b–d with Aryl Grignard Reagentsa,b,c.
Reaction conditions: 5a (0.13 mmol), ArMgBr (0.195 mmol), THF (2 mL).
Isolated yields of product.
Numbers in parentheses indicate yields according to 31P NMR.
Formation of a small amount of ketone 3a was observed but not isolated.
To verify the influence of the P = X center on the reaction course, sulfide 6a derived from 1-phenylbenzophosphole sulfide (4a) was subjected to the reaction with PhMgBr. In contrast to phosphine oxide 5a, phosphine sulfide 6a turned out to be unreactive under the developed conditions, and 6a has been recovered in 72% yield (Scheme 4).
Scheme 4. Reactivity of 6a toward PhMgBr.
In the last part of the study, we subjected triflate 5a to the reactions with different organometallic nucleophiles (Scheme 5). In the case of the reaction with phenyllithium, the selectivity of the reaction toward the formation of 8d has lowered in comparison to the use of PhMgBr. Compound 8d was still the main product but has remained in the mixture with other unidentified products. Finally, we were able to isolate 8d in a 21% yield. In turn, the reaction with the alkyl Grignard reagent has led to similar reactivity as it was observed for aryl Grignard reagents. As the result of the reaction of 5a with EtMgBr, ethyl(2-ethynylphenyl)phenylphosphine oxide (13) was observed as a major product in the reaction mixture and isolated in 58% yield.
Scheme 5. Reactivity of 5a toward Different Organometallic Nucleophiles.
A plausible mechanism for the formation of 2-ethynylphenyl(diaryl)phosphine oxides is depicted in Scheme 6 (eq 1). This includes the attack of an aryl Grignard reagent (II) on the phosphorus atom in triflate I, which, in turn, causes the opening of the five-membered ring and the formation of a triple bond in the ortho position to the phosphorus center. The consequence of the ring opening is the cleavage of the leaving group (−OTf), resulting in the formation of 2-ethynylphenyl(diaryl)phosphine oxide (III).
Scheme 6. Plausible Mechanism of the Formation of Products 8a and 9.
In eq 2, a plausible mechanism of the subsequent reaction of phosphine oxide III, leading to compound V, is presented. The deprotonation of the formed phosphine oxide III by an aryl Grignard reagent leads to the formation of an anion IV, which competes with the Grignard reagent in a reaction with another molecule of I. The attack of anion IV leads to an analogous ring opening of I as it was observed for the Grignard reagent. In accordance with eq 1, the formation of a triple bond in the ortho position in compound V is observed. As a consequence, product V with an alkyne–phosphorus bond is formed.
Conclusion
In summary, we developed a facile method for the synthesis of 2-ethynylphenyl(diaryl)phosphine oxides from readily available reagents under mild conditions and in a short time. It is the first example of the preparation of arylphosphine oxides possessing a terminal ethynyl moiety in the ortho position in a phenyl ring. The mechanism for the formation of both 2-ethynylphenyl(diaryl)phosphine oxides 8 and diphosphorus compound 9 has been proposed. The scope of the method for diverse substitution patterns in a structure of a Grignard reagent, benzophosphole core, and phosphorus atom has been investigated. The application of the method for the higher-scale preparations has been confirmed. The study of reactivity of 2-ethynylphenyl(diaryl)phosphine oxides and compound 9 is underway in our laboratory.
Experimental Section
All reactions were performed under an argon atmosphere using Schlenk techniques. Only dry solvents were used, and glassware was heated under a vacuum prior use. All chemicals were used as received unless noted otherwise. Solvents for chromatography and crystallization were distilled once before use, and the solvents for extraction were used as received. THF and toluene were distilled from sodium/benzophenone ketyl under argon. DCM was dried using P4O10 and distilled before use.
1H NMR, 31P{1H} NMR, and 13C{1H} NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Advance 500 spectrometer at an ambient temperature in CDCl3 unless otherwise noted. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm from tetramethylsilane with the solvent as an internal indicator (CDCl3 7.27 ppm for 1H and 77 ppm for 13C). Structural assignments were made with additional information from DEPT experiments. Mass spectra were recorded on Shimadzu GC–MS QP2010S in electron ionization (EI). Melting points were determined on a Büchi Melting Point M-560 in a capillary tube and were uncorrected. HPLC–HRMS was performed on a Shimazu HRMS ESI-IT-TOF using a reverse-phase stationary phase with water/MeCN (65:35) as an eluent, electrospray ionization (ESI), and an IT-TOF detector. Elementary analyses were performed on a Perkin Elmer CHN 2400. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed with precoated silica gel plates and visualized by UV light or KMnO4 solution or iodide on silica gel. The reaction mixtures were purified by column chromatography over silica gel (60–240 mesh).
Single crystals for 9 were obtained by dissolving 35 mg of 9 (an oil from chromatography column) in about 1 mL of AcOEt. Then 24 h later at 25 °C, colorless crystals appeared. Obtained crystals were isolated and dried for 24 h in rt.
The X-ray intensity data for 9 were collected on a diffractometer IPDS2T equipped with a STOE image plate detector system using a microfocus X-ray source providing Kα radiation by high-grade multilayer X-ray mirror optics for a Mo (λ = 0.71073 Å) wavelength. The measurement was carried out at 120 K. The structure of the compounds was solved by direct methods and refined against F2 with the Shelxs-2008 and Shelxl-2008 programs33 run under WinGX.34 Non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. The isotropic displacement parameters of all hydrogens were fixed to 1.2 Ueq for CH and CH2 (1.5 times for methyl groups).
The crystallographic data for the structure of 9 reported in this work have been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallograic Data Centre (CCDC 2094907).
The starting compounds were prepared according to reported methods: phenyl(methyl)phosphine oxide,35 methyl 2-iodobenzoate,36 methyl 2-iodo-6-methylbenzoate,37 methyl 2-iodo-5-chlorobenzoate,38 2-iodo-4-methoxybenzoic acid,39 methyl 2-iodo-4-methoxybenzoate.40
Syntheses of 2-Methoxycarbonylphenylphosphine Oxides 2 Were Performed According to a Reported Procedure (General Procedure A).35
(2-Methoxycarbonylphenyl)(methyl)phenylphosphine Oxide (2a).35
Methyl(phenyl)phosphine oxide (1.248 g, 8.91 mmol) was reacted according to a reported procedure35 with methyl 2-iodobenzoate (2.567 g, 9.7 mmol) to afford 2a (66%, 1.61 g, 5.9 mmol). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.33–8.53 (m, 1H), 7.87–7.89 (m, 1H), 7.68–7.71 (m, 1H), 7.56–7.63 (m, 3H), 7.42–7.49 (m, 1H), 7.38–7.42 (m, 2H), 3.54 (s, 3H), 2.22 (d, JP–H = 13.87 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.0 (d, JP–H = 2.7 Hz, C), 134.5 (d, JP–H = 107.2 Hz, C), 134.3 (d, JP–H = 7.3 Hz, CH), 133.8 (d, JP–H = 92.6 Hz, C), 133.6 (d, JP–H = 6.4 Hz, CH), 131.7 (s), 131.6 (s), 131.2 (d, JP–H = 2.7 Hz, CH), 130.2 (d, JP–H = 8.2 Hz, CH), 129.8 (d, JP–H = 10.0 Hz, CH), 128.2 (d, JP–H = 11.8 Hz, CH), 52.7 (s, H3CO), 16.3 (d, JP–H = 77.2 Hz, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 33.45 (s).
[(2-Methoxycarbonyl)-6-methylphenyl]methylphenylphosphine Oxide (2b)
Methyl(phenyl)phosphine oxide (2.2 g, 15.7 mmol) was reacted according to a reported procedure35 with methyl 2-iodo-6-methylbenzoate (4.77 g, 17.4 mmol) to afford 2b as a brown solid (65%, 2.96 g, 10.2 mmol). Mp: 73.4–74.2 °C. Rf = 0.34 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.66–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.49–7.53 (m, 1H), 7.43–7.56 (m, 3H), 7.36–7.40 (m, 1H), 7.27–7.31 (m, 1H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 2.17 (d, JP–H = 13.40 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.2 (d, JC–P = 4.5 Hz, C), 142.6 (d, JC–P= 9.1 Hz, C), 139.1 (d, JC–P= 7.3 Hz, C), 135.1 (d, JC–P = 103.5 Hz, C), 133.6 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 131.6 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.2 (d, JC–P = 1.8 Hz, CH), 130.1 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 129.9 (d, JC–P = 94.5 Hz, C), 128.6 (d, JC–P = 11.8 Hz, 2CH), 126.1 (d, JC–P = 9.1 Hz, CH), 52.6 (s, H3CO), 22.7 (d, JC–P = 4.5 Hz, CH3), 16.6 (d, JC–P = 74.6 Hz, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 32.57 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 274 (29) (M-CH3+H)+, 273 (100) (M-CH3)+, 256 (14), 213 (10), 195 (27), 179 (8), 178 (8), 167 (13), 166 (15), 165 (48), 152 (16), 139 (24), 137 (11), 121 (12), 109 (12), 107 (9), 91 (29), 90 (18), 89 (46), 79 (14), 78 (60), 77 (99), 74 (16). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+calcd for C16H17O3PNa, 311.0808; found, 311.0802.
[(2-Methoxycarbonyl)-5-chlorophenyl]methylphenylphosphine Oxide (2c)
Methyl(phenyl)phosphine oxide (2.41 g, 17.2 mmol) was reacted according to a reported procedure35 with methyl 5-chloro-2-iodo-benzoate (5.16 g, 17.4 mmol) to afford 2c as a brown solid (52%, 2.74 g, 8.9 mmol). Mp: 111–112 °C. Rf = 0.38 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.43–8.46 (m, 1H), 7.85–7.88 (m, 1H), 7.58–7.63 (m, 3H), 7.47–7.51 (m, 1H), 7.41–7.45 (m, 2H), 3.56 (s, 3H), 2.25 (d, JP–H = 14.19 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 166.1 (d, JC–P = 1.8 Hz, C), 139.0 (d, JC–P = 13.6 Hz, C), 136.7 (d, JC–P = 89.0 Hz, C), 134.7 (d, JC–P = 7.3 Hz, CH), 134.1 (d, JC–P = 108.1 Hz, C), 131.8 (d, JC–P = 9.1 Hz, CH), 131.7 (d, JC–P = 1.8 Hz, CH), 131.5 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, CH), 129.9 (d, JC–P = 10.0 Hz, CH), 128.3 (d, JC–P = 12.7 Hz, CH), 52.4 (s, CH3), 16.0 (d, JC–P = 78.1 Hz, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 32.44 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 295 (22), 294 (7), 293(72) (M-CH3)+, 263 (6), 165 (9), 163 (11), 154 (11), 153 (8), 152 (18), 151 (17), 139 (28), 138 (17), 126 (10). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C15H14ClO3PNa, 331.0261; found, 331.0270.
[(2-Methoxycarbonyl)-4-methoxyphenyl]methylphenylphosphine Oxide (2d)
Methyl(phenyl)phosphine oxide (2.27 g, 16.2 mmol) was reacted according to a reported procedure35 with methyl 2-iodo-4-methoxy-benzoate (5.25 g, 17.98 mmol) to afford 2d as a yellowish solid (55%, 2.71 g, 8.91 mmol). Mp: 115.9–116.5 °C. Rf = 0.28 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.26–8.31 (m, 1H), 7.58–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.49 (m, 1H), 7.39–7.41 (m, 3H), 7.17–7.20 (m, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.54 (s, 3H), 2.19 (d, JP–H = 14.2 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 166.8 (d, JC–P = 1.8 Hz, C), 162.0 (d, JC–P = 1.8 Hz, C), 136.4 (d, JC–P = 9.1 Hz, CH), 135.3 (d, JC–P = 7.3 Hz, C), 135.1 (d, JC–P = 106.3 Hz, C), 131.1 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, CH), 129.8 (d, JC–P = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 128.2 (d, JC–P = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 124.8 (d, JC–P = 100.0 Hz, C), 116.5 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, CH), 116.4 (d, JC–P = 5.5 Hz, CH), 55.6 (s, CH3), 52.2 (s, CH3), 16.6 (d, JC–P = 78.1 Hz, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 32.55 (s). GC–MS (EI): m/z 304 (2) (M)+, 290 (18), 289 (100) (M-CH3)+, 273 (13), 257 (16), 227 (13), 211 (13), 139 (31), 121 (11), 107 (10), 91 (14), 77 (50). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C16H17O4P, 305.0937; found, 305.0929.
Synthesis of Benzophospholan-3-one Oxides 3 (General Procedure B).41
To a Schlenk tube (100 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirrer and an argon inlet phosphine was added oxide 2 (2.0 mmol) in anhydrous THF (15 mL), and the mixture was cooled to −78 °C with a dry ice/acetone bath. Then, LDA (2.5 mL, 5.0 mmol, 2 M solution) was added, and the mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 30 min. After that time, the ice bath was removed. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt overnight and then quenched by the addition of a saturated NH4Cl solution (5 mL) and extracted with CHCl3 (5 × 10 mL). The collected organic phases were dried over Na2SO4, the solid was filtered off, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was checked using NMR techniques. Then, the crude mixture was dissolved in DCM (30 mL), solution of HCl (1 M, 10 mL) was added, and the mixture was vigorously stirred for 30 min. Then the acidic water phase was removed in a separating funnel, the organic phase was returned to the flask, and another portion of HCl (1 M, 10 mL) was added. The mixture was once again vigorously stirred for 30 min, and after that time, the acidic water phase was separated. The organic phase was washed with water (10 mL) and dried over Na2SO4. The solid was filtered off, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by short (5 cm) column chromatography on silica gel using CHCl3/acetone (2:1 v/v) or CHCl3/EtOAc/MeOH (30:5:1 v/v/v) as an eluent.
Benzophospholan-3-one Oxide (3a).29
Compound 2a (0.55 g, 2.0 mmol) was reacted according to general procedure B to afford 3a (55%, 0.266 g, 1.1 mmol). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.03–8.07 (m, 1H), 7.85–7.90 (m, 1H), 7.75–7.83 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.60 (m, 3H), 7.44–7.48 (m, 2H), 3.12–3.31 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.3 (d, JC–P = 12.7 Hz, C), 141.5 (d, JC–P = 91.7 Hz, C), 141.3 (d, JC–P = 12.7 Hz, C), 135.9 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, CH), 133.6 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, CH), 132.5 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, CH), 130.8 (d, JC–P = 105.4 Hz, C), 130.6 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 129.3 (d, JC–P = 6.4 Hz, CH), 128.9 (d, JC–P = 13.6 Hz, CH), 124.6 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, CH), 40.1 (d, JC–P = 71.8 Hz, CH2). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.92 (s).
7-Methylbenzophospholan-3-one Oxide (3b)
Compound 2b (0.577 g, 2.0 mmol) was reacted according to general procedure B to afford 3b as a beige solid (55%, 0.28 g, 1.1 mmol). Mp: 165–166 °C (dec.). Rf = 0.66 (2:1 CHCl3/acetone). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.78–7.7.92 (m, 1H), 7.64–7.68 (m, 1H), 7.53–7.63 (m, 4H), 7.46–7.58 (m, 2H), 3.09–3.32 (m, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.6 (d, JC–P = 13.6 Hz, C), 142.0 (d, JC–P = 5.5 Hz, C), 141.8 (d, JC–P = 12.7 Hz, C), 139.7 (d, JC–P = 90.8 Hz, C), 137.1 (d, JC–P = 9.1 Hz, CH), 133.9 (d, JC–P = 1.8 Hz, CH), 132.4 (d, JC–P = 3.6 Hz, CH), 130.9 (d, JC–P = 103.5 Hz, C), 130.6 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, CH), 129.0 (d, JC–P = 12.7 Hz, CH), 122.2 (d, JC–P = 11.8 Hz, CH), 40.5 (d, JC–P = 71.5 Hz, CH2), 19.4 (d, JC–P = 4.5 Hz, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 30.36 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 258 (7), 257 (13), 256 (63) (M)+, 255 (37), 236 (8), 213 (24), 179 (9), 166 (28), 165 (42), 151 (10), 150 (12), 137 (14), 121 (12), 106 (29). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C15H13O2P [M + Na]+, 279.0545; found, 279.0553.
6-Chlorobenzophospholan-3-one Oxide (3c)
Compound 2c (0.617 g, 2.0 mmol) was reacted according to general procedure B to afford 3c as an orange oil (55%, 0.3 g, 1.1 mmol). Rf = 0.36 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.99–8.01 (m, 1H), 7.81–7.84 (m, 1H), 7.72–7.74 (m, 1H), 7.58–7.62 (m, 3H), 7.49–7.52 (m, 2H), 3.16–3.36 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 192.9 (d, JC–P = 12.7 Hz, C), 143.5 (d, JC–P = 108.1 Hz, C), 143.1 (d, JC–P= 33.6 Hz, C), 139.5 (d, JC–P = 12.7 Hz, C), 134.2 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, CH), 132.9 (d, JC–P = 3.6 Hz, CH), 130.7 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, CH), 130.1 (d, JC–P = 106.3 Hz, C), 129.3 (d, JC–P = 6.4 Hz, CH), 129.2 (d, JC–P = 14.5 Hz, CH), 126.1 (d, JC–P = 11.8 Hz, CH), 40.2 (d, JC–P = 71.8 Hz, CH2). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 32.55 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 278 (14), 277 (7), 276 (49) (M)+, 235 (14), 234 (14), 233 (57). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C14H10ClO2P [M + H]+, 277.0180; found, 277.0180.
5-Methoxybenzophospholan-3-one Oxide (3d)
Compound 2d (0.609 g, 2.0 mmol) was reacted according to general procedure B to afford 3d as a brown oil (59%, 0.32 g, 1.18 mmol). Rf = 0.72 (2:1 CHCl3/acetone). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.74–7.78 (m, 1H), 7.52–7.59 (m, 3H), 7.44–7.47 (m, 3H), 7.32–7.35 (m, 1H), 3.93 (m, 3H), 3.11–3.32 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.3 (d, JC–P = 12.7 Hz, C), 164.2 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, C), 144.0 (d, JC–P = 14.5 Hz, C), 133.2 (d, JC–P = 97.2 Hz, C), 132.4 (d, JC–P = 3.6 Hz, CH), 133.2 (d, JC–P = 107.2 Hz, C), 130.7 (d, JC–P = 10.7 Hz, 2CH), 130.6 (d, JC–P = 7.4 Hz, CH), 129.0 (d, JC–P = 12.9 Hz, 2CH), 124.7 (d, JC–P = 11.7 Hz, CH), 106.5 (d, JC–P = 12.6 Hz, CH), 55.9 (s, OCH3), 40.8 (d, JC–P = 71.8 Hz, CH2). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 28.92 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 273 (24), 272 (100) (M)+, 271 (17), 256 (12), 244 (21), 229 (49), 210 (12), 208 (15), 195 (18), 193 (19), 183 (10), 179 (31), 165 (21), 153 (12), 152 (29), 148 (13), 139 (21), 137 (11), 120 (43), 107 (24), 91 (36), 89 (14). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C15H13O3P [M + H]+, 273.0675; found, 273.0681.
Synthesis of Benzophospholan-3-one Sulfide (4a, General Procedure C)
To a Schlenk tube (100 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirrer and an argon inlet was added phosphine oxide 3a (0.528 g, 2.18 mmol) in anhydrous toluene (20 mL). Then, HSiCl3 (2.2 mL, 21.8 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred at rt for 18 h. The crude reaction mixture was checked using the 31P{1H} NMR technique. Then, sulfur (21.8 mmol) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 8 h. Then, the reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of saturated NH4Cl solution (5 mL) and extracted with CHCl3 (5 × 10 mL). The collected organic phases were dried over Na2SO4, the solid was filtered off, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using hexane/i-PrOH (10:1 v/v) as an eluent.
Benzophospholan-3-one Sulfide (4a)
Compound 3a (0.48 g, 2.0 mmol) was reacted according to general procedure C to afford 4 as a brownish oil (67%, 0.346 g, 1.34 mmol). Rf = 0.44 (10:1 hexane/i-PrOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.03–8.07 (m, 1H), 7.83–7.91 (m, 2H), 7.74–7.78 (m, 1H), 7.65–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.53 (m, 1H), 7.44–7.48 (m, 2H), 3.35–3.47 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.3 (d, JC–P = 9.1 Hz, C), 143.4 (d, JC–P = 76.3 Hz, C), 139.6 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, C), 136.4 (d, JC–P = 11.8 Hz, CH), 132.9 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, CH), 132.1 (d, JC–P = 3.6 Hz, CH), 131.2 (d, JC–P = 81.8 Hz, C), 130.8 (d, JC–P = 11.8 Hz, 2CH), 129.4 (d, JC–P = 7.3 Hz, CH), 128.9 (d, JC–P = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 128.3 (d, JC–P = 19.9 Hz, C), 124.8 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, CH), 45.8 (d, JC–P = 57.2 Hz, CH2). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 32.02 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 260 (7), 259 (58) (M)+, 258 (100), 226 (15), 184 (10), 185 (33), 165 (24), 153 (11), 152 (31), 151 (7), 150 (12), 149 (98), 139 (21), 136 (10), 134 (12), 121 (36), 120 (12), 118 (11), 109 (44), 108 (24), 107 (67), 95 (13), 91 (29), 90 (15), 89 (20), 81 (19), 78 (20). Anal. Calcd for C14H11OPS: C, 65.10; H, 4.29. Found: C, 64.90; H, 4.10.
Synthesis of Triflates 5 and 6a (General Procedure D)
To a Schlenk tube (50 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirrer and an argon inlet was added phosphine oxide 3 (0.3 mmol) or sulfide 4a (0.3 mmol) in anhydrous DCM (8 mL), and the mixture was cooled to −78 °C with a dry ice/acetone bath. DIPEA (78.4 μL, 0.45 mmol) was added dropwise. Then, Tf2O (61 μL, 0.36 mmol) was added dropwise with vigorous stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 30 min. The crude reaction mixture was checked using the 31P{1H} NMR technique. Then, the reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of 1 M HCl solution (5 mL) and extracted with CHCl3 (5 × 10 mL). The collected organic phases were dried over Na2SO4, the solid was filtered off, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using CHCl3/acetone (2:1 v/v) as an eluent.
1-Oxido-1-phenyl-1H-phosphindol-3-yl Trifluoromethanesulfonate (5a)
Compound 3a (0.073 g, 0.3 mmol) was reacted according to general procedure D to afford 5a as an orange solid (75%, 0.084 g, 0.225 mmol). Mp: 120.1–121.1 °C. Rf = 0.76 (2:1 CHCl3/acetone). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.68–7.75 (m, 3H), 7.62–7.66 (m, 1H), 7.56–7.61 (m, 1H), 7.52–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.46–7.50 (m, 2H), 6.31 (d, JH–P = 14.82 Hz, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 156.7 (d, JC–P = 34.5 Hz, C), 135.8 (d, JC–P = 19.1 Hz, C), 133.4 (d, JC–P = 1.8 Hz, CH), 133.1 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, CH), 132.2 (d, JC–P = 104.5 Hz, C), 131.5 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, CH), 130.8 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 129.5 (d, JC–P = 8.2 Hz, CH), 129.1 (d, JC–P = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 127.5 (d, JC–P = 108.1 Hz, C), 121.0 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, CH), 118.5 (q, JC–P = 321.5 Hz, CF3), 108.9 (d, JC–P = 95.4 Hz, CH). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 32.12 (s). 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ −72.96 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 374 (5) (M)+, 240 (23), 194 (44), 183 (11), 179 (6), 178 (31), 177 (6), 166 (16), 165 (44), 152 (11), 151 (7), 107 (15), 89 (12), 77 (17), 69 (100). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C15H10F3O4PS [M + H]+, 375.0062; found, 375.0053.
1-Oxido-1-phenyl-1H-7-methylphosphindol-3-yl Trifluoromethanesulfonate (5b)
Compound 3b (0.077 g, 0.3 mmol) was reacted according to general procedure D to afford 5b as a yellow solid (55%, 0.064 g, 0.165 mmol). Mp: 125–126.5 °C. Rf = 0.68 (2:1 CHCl3/acetone). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.73–7.77 (m, 2H), 7.58–7.61 (m, 1H), 7.47–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.35–7.37 (m, 1H), 7.27–7.29 (m, 2H), 6.25 (d, JH–P = 15.13 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 156.8 (d, JC–P = 34.5 Hz, C), 142.2 (d, JC–P = 8.2 Hz, C), 135.8 (d, JC–P = 19.1 Hz, C), 133.5 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, CH), 133.1 (d, JC–P = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.9 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, CH), 130.8 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 130.3 (d, JC–P = 103.5 Hz, C), 129.2 (d, JC–P = 13.6 Hz, 2CH), 127.3 (d, JC–P = 106.3 Hz, C), 118.5 (q, JC–P = 321.5 Hz, CF3), 118.48 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, CH), 108.9 (d, JC–P = 95.4 Hz, CH), 19.4 (s, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 32.47 (s). 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ −72.98 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 388 (9) (M)+, 255 (9), 208 (33), 192 (18), 178 (16), 165 (26), 89 (13), 77 (19). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C16H12O4F3PS [M + H]+, 389.0219; found, 389.0213.
1-Oxido-1-phenyl-1H-6-chlorophosphindol-3-yl Trifluoromethanesulfonate (5c)
Compound 3c (0.083 g, 0.3 mmol) was reacted according to general procedure D to afford 5c as an orange oil (60%, 0.074 g, 0.18 mmol). Rf = 0.75 (2:1 CHCl3/acetone). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.71–7.75 (m, 2H), 7.58–7.65 (m, 3H), 7.45–7.52 (m, 3H), 6.31 (d, JH–P = 15.29 Hz, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 156.2 (d, JC–P = 33.6 Hz, C), 138.4 (d, JC–P = 14.3 Hz, C), 134.6 (d, JC–P = 100.8 Hz, C), 133.9 (d, JC–P = 19.1 Hz, C), 133.4 (d, JC–P = 2.7 Hz, CH), 133.3 (d, JC–P = 1.8 Hz, CH), 130.8 (d, JC–P = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 128.9 (d, JC–P = 10.0 Hz, CH), 128.4 (d, JC–P = 13.6 Hz, 2CH), 126.7 (d, JC–P = 108.9 Hz, C), 122.2 (d, JC–P = 11.8 Hz, CH), 118.5 (q, JC–P = 320.6 Hz, CF3), 109.9 (d, JC–P = 98.6 Hz, CH). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 31.06 (s). 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ −72.83 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 411 (3) 410 (10), 409 (5), 408 (28) (M)+, 277 (16), 276 (16), 275 (51), 259 (22), 232 (11), 229 (30), 229 (20), 228 (100), 214 (30), 213 (14), 212 (92), 211 (11), 199 (22), 196 (22), 193 (36), 183 (13), 176 (16), 166 (16), 165 (75), 164 (14), 151 (24), 140 (11), 107 (21), 105 (28), 89 (12). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C15H9ClF3O4PS [M + H]+, 408.9673; found, 408.9681.
1-Oxido-1-phenyl-1H-5-methoxyphosphindol-3-yl Trifluoromethanesulfonate (5d)
Compound 3c (0.082 g, 0.3 mmol) was reacted according to general procedure D to afford 5d as an orange oil (58%, 0.07 g, 0.174 mmol). Rf = 0.65 (2:1 CHCl3/acetone). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.68–7.72 (m, 2H), 7.55–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.44–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.03–7.04 (m, 1H), 6.97–7.00 (m, 1H), 6.30 (d, JH–P = 14.66 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 164.0 (JP–C = 1.8 Hz, C), 155.9 (d, JP–C = 33.6 Hz, C), 138.2 (d, JP–C = 20.9 Hz, C), 132.9 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.1 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 130.8 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, 2CH), 129.1 (d, JP–C = 13.6 Hz, 2CH), 129.7 (d, JP–C = 108.9 Hz, C), 122.7 (d, JP–C = 110.8 Hz, C), 118.6 (q, JP–C = 320.6 Hz, CF3), 115.5 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, CH), 110.5 (d, JP–C = 94.5 Hz, CH), 108.0 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 55.8 (s, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 30.95 (s). 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ - 72.89 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 405 (2), 404 (11) (M)+, 282 (13), 281 (33), 273 (11), 272 (62) (M-SO2CF3), 271 (57), 256 (72), 240 (20), 229 (24), 224 (71) 223 (18), 209 (38), 208 (94), 207 (100), 196 (15), 195 (25), 179 (49), 165 (29), 152 (34), 151 (18), 148 (18), 139 (24), 137 (18), 120 (36), 106 (24), 91 (47), 89 (19). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C16H12O5F3PS [M + H]+, 405.0168; found, 405.0165.
1-Sulfido-1-phenyl-1H-phosphindol-3-yl Trifluoromethanesulfonate (6a)
Compound 4a (0.077 g, 0.3 mmol) was reacted according to general procedure D to afford 6 as a yellowish solid (50%, 0.058 g, 0.15 mmol). Mp: 109–110 °C. Rf = 0.59 (10:1 hexane/i-PrOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.78–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.68–7.72 (m, 2H), 7.54–7.59 (m, 3H), 7.44–7.48 (m, 2H), 6.40 (d, JH–P = 18.60 Hz, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 154.7 (d, JP–C = 28.9 Hz, C), 135.59 (d, JP–C = 87.9 Hz, C), 135.58 (d, JP–C = 16.2 Hz, C), 132.8 (d, JP–C = 3.1 Hz, CH), 132.7 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 133.2 (d, JP–C = 11.7 Hz, CH), 130.8 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, CH), 129.1 (d, JP–C = 12.9 Hz, CH), 128.9 (d, JP–C = 9.2 Hz, CH), 127.4 (d, JP–C = 84.4 Hz, C), 121.3 (d, JP–C = 10.4 Hz, CH), 118.5 (q, JP–C = 321.4 Hz, CF3), 112.4 (d, JP–C = 78.8 Hz, CH). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 41.0 (s). 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ −72.92 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 391 (7), 390 (34), 258 (22), 257 (100), 239 (14), 229 (31), 225 (21), 210 (17), 197 (27), 196 (47), 195 (15), 194 (37), 193 (17), 182 (26), 178 (49), 166 (25), 165 (82), 152 (39). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C15H10O3F3PS2 [M + H]+, 390.9834; found, 390.9834.
Reaction of 5 or 6 with Aryl Grignard Reagents (General Procedure E)
To a Schlenk tube (25 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirrer and an argon inlet was added phosphine oxide 5 or 6 (0.13 mmol) in anhydrous THF (2 mL), and the mixture was cooled to 0 °C. Then, aryl Grignard reagent (0.195 mmol) was added. Then, the reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 30–60 min. Then, the reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of NH4Cl solution (5 mL) and extracted with CHCl3 (5 × 5 mL). The collected organic phases were dried over Na2SO4, the solid was filtered off, and the was filtrate evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude reaction mixture was checked using the NMR technique. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using CHCl3/EtOAc/MeOH (30:5:1 v/v) or CHCl3/MTBE (30:1 v/v) as an eluent.
(2-Ethynylphenyl)phenyl(p-tolyl)phosphine Oxide (8a)
Compound 5a (0.0486 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-TolMgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 30 min to afford 8a (0.0403 g, 0.127 mmol, 98% yield) as a yellowish solid. Mp: 173–174 °C. Rf = 0.45 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.71–7.75 (m, 2H), 7.59–7.68 (m, 4H), 7.40–7.56 (m, 5H), 7.26–7.28 (m, 2H), 3.00 (s, 1H), 2.41 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 142.3 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, C), 134.9 (d, JP–C = 100.8 Hz, C), 134.9 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 133.8 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 132.5 (d, JP–C = 106.3 Hz, C), 132.3 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 132.2 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 131.7 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.6 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 129.1 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 128.7 (d, JP–C = 108.9 Hz, C), 128.4 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 128.3 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 125.3 (d, JP–C = 7.3 Hz, C), 85.0 (s, C), 81.5 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH), 21.6 (s, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 28.70 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 317 (21), 316 (93) (M)+, 315 (100), 297 (15), 269 (13), 268 (15), 254 (18), 253 (18), 252 (15), 239 (34), 223 (17), 215 (11), 210 (12), 197 (11), 196 (19), 191 (11), 189 (11), 182 (15), 174 (17), 165 (32), 152 (21), 91 (24), 89 (12), 78 (15). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C21H17OP [M + H]+, 317.1090; found, 317.1088.
(2-Ethynylphenyl)phenyl(m-tolyl)phosphine Oxide (8b)
Compound 5a (0.0486 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with m-TolMgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 30 min to afford 8b (0.0345 g, 0.109 mmol, 84% yield) as a yellowish oil. Rf = 0.65 (2:1 CHCl3/acetone). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.71–7.75 (m, 2H), 7.60–7.68 (m, 3H), 7.39–7.58 (m, 6H), 7.33–7.36 (m, 2H), 3.00 (s, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 138.2 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, C), 134.9 (d, JP–C = 8.2 Hz, CH), 134.7 (d, JP–C = 100.8 Hz, C), 133.8 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 132.6 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 132.59 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.4 (d, JP–C = 105.4 Hz, C), 132.15 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 134.7 (d, JP–C = 100.8 Hz, C), 131.8 (d, JP–C = 105.4 Hz, C), 131.7 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.6 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 129.3 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, CH), 128.4 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 128.3 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 128.1 (d, JP–C = 13.6 Hz, CH), 125.3 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 84.9 (s, C), 81.6 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, CH), 21.5 (s, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 28.56 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 317 (22), 316 (100) (M)+, 315 (97), 268 (20), 267 (13), 254 (11), 253 (24), 252 (17), 239 (28), 210 (15), 207 (11), 197 (14), 196 (35), 195 (11), 194 (10), 189 (12), 183 (14), 178 (26), 176 (19), 166 (11), 165 (48), 153 (12), 152 (42), 151 (16), 150 (12), 107 (16), 102 (12), 101 (12), 92 (35), 91 (67), 89 (40). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C21H17OP [M + Na]+, 339.0909; found, 339.0912.
(2-Ethynylphenyl)phenyl(o-tolyl)phosphine Oxide (8c)
Compound 5a (0.0486 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with o-TolMgCl (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 30 min to afford 8c (0.0156 g, 0.0494 mmol, 38% yield) as a yellowish oil. Rf = 0.15 (30:1 CHCl3/MTBE). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.75–7.82 (m, 3H), 7.61–7.63 (m, 1H), 7.52–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.41–7.49 (m, 5H), 7.18–7.20 (m, 1H), 7.13–7.16 (m, 1H), 2.94 (s, 1H), 2.47 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 143.2 (d, JP–C = 8.2 Hz, C), 135.0 (d, JP–C = 99.9 Hz, C), 134.9 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 133.7 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, CH), 133.4 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 132.4 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 131.9 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.8 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.55 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, CH), 131.51 (d, JP–C = 7.3 Hz, CH), 130.4 (d, JP–C = 105.4 Hz, C), 128.7 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 128.3 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, CH), 124.9 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, CH), 124.9 (d, JP–C = 7.3 Hz, C), 84.7 (s, C), 81.4 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH), 21.7 (s, CH3). 31P NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 30.71 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 317 (8), 316 (48) (M)+, 315 (100), 237 (17), 220 (11), 191 (16), 189 (14), 178 (11), 165 (21), 77 (11). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C21H17OP [2M + Na]+, 655.1926; found, 655.1929.
[2-(Ethynyl)phenyl]diphenylphosphine Oxide (8d)
Compound 5a (0.0486 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with PhMgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 30 min to afford 8d (0.0373 g, 0.124 mmol, 95% yield) as a yellowish solid. Mp: 181.9–182.9 °C. Rf = 0.59 (2:1 CHCl3/acetone). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.72–7.77 (m, 4H), 7.65–7.69 (m, 1H), 7.61–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.49–7.59 (m, 3H), 7.41–7.48 (m, 5H), 2.99 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 134.9 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 134.7 (d, JP–C = 100.8 Hz, C), 133.8 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.2 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.1 (d, JP–C = 106.2 Hz, C), 131.8 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.6 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 128.5 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 128.3 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, CH), 125.3 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 85.0 (s, C), 81.5 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH). 31P NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 28.49 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 303 (12), 302 (50) (M)+, 301 (46), 254 (12), 253 (12), 252 (12), 225 (17), 196 (24), 183 (16), 178 (17), 176 (14), 165 (31), 152 (27), 151 (15), 107 (13), 101 (11), 78 (44), 77 (93), 76 (15), 75 (33), 74 (17). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C20H15OP [M + Na]+, 325.0753; found, 325.0754.
p-Anisyl(2-ethynylphenyl)phenylphosphine Oxide (8e)
Compound 5a (0.0486 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-AnMgBr (0.39 mL, 0.195 mmol, 0.5 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 30 min to afford 8e (0.0419 g, 0.127 mmol, 98% yield) as a yellowish solid. Mp: 149.5–150.5 °C. Rf = 0.58 (2:1 CHCl3/acetone). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.65–7.76 (m, 5H), 7.61–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.49–7.51 (m, 2H), 7.41–7.48 (m, 3H), 6.97–6.99 (m, 2H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.01 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 162.5 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, C), 134.9 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 134.7 (d, JP–C = 100.8 Hz, C), 134.2 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 133.8 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 132.3 (d, JP–C = 107.2 Hz, C), 132.2 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 131.8 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.7 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 128.5 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, CH), 128.3 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, 2CH), 125.2 (d, JP–C = 7.3 Hz, C), 122.8 (d, JP–C = 112.6 Hz, C), 113.9 (d, JP–C = 13.6 Hz, 2CH), 85.0 (s, C), 81.6 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH), 55.3 (s, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 28.15 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 333 (22), 332 (100) (M)+, 331 (72), 317 (19), 284 (14), 270 (15), 255 (24), 253 (14), 252 (12), 241 (11), 240 (10), 239 (20), 231 (10), 226 (15), 196 (15), 194 (15), 184 (11), 183 (36), 178 (13), 176 (17), 170 (16), 169 (10), 165 (52), 163 (12), 157 (10), 152 (30), 151 (12), 141 (12), 139 (18), 125 (25), 120 (15), 15 (15), 108 (11), 107 (19), 101 (10), 95 (17), 92 (41), 78 (34), 77 (34), 76 (18). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C21H17O2P [M + Na]+, 355.0856; found, 355.0856.
m-Anisyl(2-ethynylphenyl)phenylphosphine Oxide (8f)
Compound 5a (0.0486 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with m-AnMgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 30 min to afford 8f (0.0385 g, 0.116 mmol, 89% yield) as a yellow solid. Mp: 129–130 °C. Rf = 0.69 (2:1 CHCl3/acetone). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.71–7.77 (m, 2H), 7.60–7.64 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.44–7.49 (m, 3H), 7.39–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.27 (m, 1H), 7.07–7.09 (m, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.02 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.4 (d, JP–C = 14.5 Hz, C), 134.9 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 133.8 (d, JP–C = 9.9 Hz, CH), 133.3 (d, JP–C = 105.4 Hz, C), 132.1 (d, JP–C = 9.9 Hz, 2CH), 132.0 (d, JP–C = 103.5 Hz, C), 131.8 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, CH), 131.7 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 129.5 (d, JP–C = 15.4 Hz, CH), 128.4 (d, JP–C = 9.9 Hz, CH), 128.3 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 125.3 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 124.5 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 118.1 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 116.9 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, CH), 85.1 (s, C), 81.5 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, CH), 55.4 (s, OCH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 28.82 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 334 (5), 333 (19), 332 (82) (M)+, 331 (83), 317 (21), 316 (11), 285 (11), 284 (16), 281 (17), 271 (10), 270 (20), 269 (13), 254 (16), 253 (24), 251 (16), 240 (12), 238 (29), 226 (18), 225 (18), 223 (16), 208 (11), 207 (40), 199 (10), 196 (21), 195 (13). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C21H17O2P [M + Na]+, 355.0858; found, 355.0860.
o-Anisyl(2-ethynylphenyl)phenylphosphine Oxide (8g)
Compound 5a (0.0486 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with o-AnMgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 30 min to afford 8g (0.0397 g, 0.119 mmol, 92% yield) as a yellow solid. Mp: 156.7–157.7 °C. Rf = 0.54 (2:1 CHCl3/acetone). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.84–7.88 (m, 2H), 7.70–7.74 (m, 1H), 7.61–7.66 (m, 1H), 7.56–7.58 (m, 1H), 7.48–7.54 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.46 (m, 3H), 7.36–7.39 (m, 1H), 7.03–7.06 (m, 1H), 6.89–6.92 (m, 1H), 3.54 (s, 3H), 2.89 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 161.1 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, C), 134.9 (d, JP–C = 7.3 Hz, CH), 134.4 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 134.1 (d, JP–C = 1.9 Hz, CH), 132.9 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.2 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 131.4 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 130.9 (d, JP–C = 1.9 Hz, CH), 128.2 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 127.9 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 124.5 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 120.8 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 111.7 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, CH), 84.0 (s, C), 81.4 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, CH), 55.3 (s, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 26.19 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 333 (10), 332 (42) (M)+, 331 (55), 254 (12), 253 (12), 252 (12), 225 (17), 196 (24), 183 (16), 178 (17), 176 (14), 165 (31), 152 (27), 151 (15), 107 (13), 101 (11), 78 (44), 77 (93), 76 (15), 75 (33), 74 (17). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C21H17O2P [M + Na]+, 355.0858; found, 355.0851.
2-Ethynylphenyl(9-phenanthryl)phenylphosphine Oxide (8h)
Compound 5a (0.0486 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with 9-phenanthryl magnesium bromide (0.39 mL, 0.195 mmol, 0.5 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 30 min to afford 8h (0.0366 g, 0.091 mmol, 70% yield) as a yellow solid. Mp: 192–193 °C (dec.). Rf = 0.25 (100:1 CHCl3/MTBE). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.86–8.75 (m, 3H), 7.79–7.89 (m, 3H), 7.73–7.78 (m, 3H), 7.65–7.68 (m, 1H), 7.62–7.64 (m, 1H), 7.57–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.55 (m, 5H), 2.84 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 137.0 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 135.0 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 134.8 (d, JP–C = 99.0 Hz, C), 133.7 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.6 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.1 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, C), 132.0 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.9 (d, JP–C = 106.3 Hz, C), 131.7 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 131.2 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, C), 130.5 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, C), 130.1 (s, CH), 129.7 (d, JP–C = 14.5 Hz, C), 129.0 (s, CH), 128.6 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 128.5 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 128.4 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, CH), 127.2 (d, JP–C = 106.3 Hz, C), 127.1 (d, JP–C = 15.4 Hz, CH), 126.9 (s, CH), 125.4 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 123.0 (s, CH), 122.7 (s, CH), 84.7 (s, C), 81.5 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 31.94 (s). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C28H19OP [2M + Na]+, 827.2239; found, 827.2228.
p-Chlorophenyl(2-ethynylphenyl)phenylphosphine Oxide (8i)
Compound 5a (0.0486 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-Cl–C6H4MgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 30 min to afford 8i (0.0366 g, 0.107 mmol, 82% yield) as a yellow solid. Mp: 117.5–118 °C. Rf = 0.55 (2:1 CHCl3/acetone). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.67–7.75 (m, 5H), 7.62–7.65 (m, 1H), 7.51–7.59 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.49 (m, 5H), 3.02 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 138.4 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, C), 135.0 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 134.1 (d, JP–C = 102.6 Hz, C), 133.8 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 133.6 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, CH), 132.15 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.12 (d, JP–C = 3.1 Hz, CH), 131.9 (d, JP–C = 2.5 Hz, CH), 131.0 (d, JP–C = 106.3 Hz, C), 128.6 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, CH), 128.5 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 128.4 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 125.2 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 85.3 (s, C), 81.5 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, CH). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 27.61 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 338 (17), 337 (32), 336 (61) (M)+, 335 (60), 250 (21), 253 (19), 252 (23), 225 (14), 212 (10), 199 (12), 196 (31), 194 (13), 183 (16), 178 (18), 176 (28), 169 (13), 165 (30), 152 (37), 150 (25), 119 (12). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C20H14ClOP [M + H]+, 337.0544; found, 337.0537.
2-Ethynylphenyl(p-fluorophenyl)phenylphosphine Oxide (8j)
Compound 5a (0.0486 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p–F-C6H4MgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 30 min to afford 8j (0.034 g, 0.107 mmol, 82% yield) as a yellow oil. Rf = 0.52 (30:5:1 CHCl3/EtOAc/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.68–7.77 (m, 5H), 7.61–7.64 (m, 1H), 7.51–7.58 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.49 (m, 3H), 7.13–7.17 (m, 2H), 3.01 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 165.1 (dd, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, JF–C= 237.0 Hz, CF), 134.9 (d, JP–C = 8.2 Hz, CH), 134.7 (dd, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, JF–C= 11.8 Hz, 2CH), 134.2 (d, JP–C = 100.8 Hz, C), 133.7 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 132.1 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 132.0 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.9 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.8 (d, JP–C = 108.1 Hz, C), 128.6 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 128.4 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, 2CH), 128.1 (dd, JF–C= 2.7 Hz, JP–C = 108.9 Hz, C), 125.2 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 115.7 (dd, J = 20.9 Hz, JP–C = 13.6 Hz, CH), 85.2 (s, C), 81.5 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 27.61 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 321 (14), 320 (58) (M)+, 319 (68), 300 (16), 273 (15), 272 (20), 271 (19), 270 (15), 252 (11), 242 (18), 245 (18), 214 (23), 201 (20), 196 (28), 194 (20), 183 (20), 178 (11), 176 (17), 170 (19), 165 (26), 152 (26), 151 (13), 150 (16), 126 (11), 107 (17). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C20H14FOP [M + H]+, 321.0839; found, 321.0841.
(2-Ethynylphenyl)phenyl[p-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]phosphine Oxide (8k)
Compound 5a (0.0486 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-Me2N–C6H4MgBr (0.39 mL, 0.195 mmol, 0.5 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 30 min to afford 8k (0.0269 g, 0.078 mmol, 60% yield) as a yellow solid. Mp: 194.9–195.7 °C. Rf = 0.42 (30:5:1 CHCl3/EtOAc/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.68–7.74 (m, 3H), 7.58–7.61 (m, 1H), 7.53–7.58 (m, 2H), 7.48–7.52 (m, 1H), 7.38–7.47 (m, 4H), 6.70–6.72 (m, 2H), 3.02 (s, 6H), 3.02 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.3 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, C), 135.8 (d, JP–C = 100.8 Hz, C), 134.8 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 133.8 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 133.6 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 133.3 (d, JP–C = 106.3 Hz, C), 132.1 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 131.3 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.2 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 128.3 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 128.1 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, 2CH), 125.2 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 116.3 (d, JP–C = 118.1 Hz, C), 111.1 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 84.6 (s, C), 81.8 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH), 39.9 (s, 2CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 28.92 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 346 (18), 345 (100) (M)+, 344 (32), 330 (15), 329 (11), 252 (16), 183 (10), 152 (12), 136 (13), 77 (12), 51 (10). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C22H20NOP [M + H]+, 346.1355; found, 346.1360.
(2-Ethynyl-6-methylphenyl)phenyl(p-tolyl)phosphine Oxide (10a)
Compound 5b (0.0505 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-TolMgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 1 h to afford 10a (0.0283 g, 0.086 mmol, 66% yield) as a yellowish oil. Rf = 0.15 (200:1 CHCl3/MTBE). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.68–7.72 (m, 2H), 7.59–7.63 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.54 (m, 1H), 7.39–7.43 (m, 3H), 7.33–7.36 (m, 1H), 7.24–7.27 (m, 3H), 2.61 (s, 1H), 2.59 (s, 3H), 2.41 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 145.5 (d, JP–C = 7.3 Hz, C), 142.3 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, C), 134.4 (d, JP–C = 105.4 Hz, C), 133.6 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 133.1 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.1 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 4CH), 131.6 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.1 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 130.5 (d, JP–C = 107.2 Hz, C), 129.1 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 129.1 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, 2CH), 125.7 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, C), 84.6 (s, C), 82.1 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, CH), 23.3 (d, JP–C = 4.5 Hz, CH), 21.6 (s, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 30.67 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 330 (1) (M)+, 329 (1), 305 (19), 304 (100), 303 (55), 302 (18), 289 (14), 288 (22), 273 (18), 258 (11), 257 (36), 256 (16), 242 (29), 241 (24), 240 (14), 239 (22), 227 (21), 213 (19), 197 (18), 196 (18), 194 (17), 183 (49), 178 (11), 170 (12), 166 (15), 165 (67), 164 (11), 163 (14), 152 (34), 139 (17), 91 (42), 89 (25), 78 (23), 77 (70). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C22H19OP [M + H]+, 331.1246; found, 331.1236.
(2-Ethynyl-6-methylphenyl]diphenylphosphine Oxide (10d)
Compound 5b (0.0505 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with PhMgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 1 h to afford 10d (0.0374 g, 0.118 mmol, 91% yield) as a yellowish oil. Rf = 0.15 (200:1 CHCl3/MTBE). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.70–7.74 (m, 4H), 7.52–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.46 (m, 5H), 7.33–7.38 (m, 1H), 7.27–7.30 (m, 1H), 2.61 (s, 1H), 2.60 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 145.6 (d, JP–C = 7.3 Hz, C), 134.4 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, C), 133.7 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 133.1 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 132.1 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, CH), 131.8 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.1 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 128.3 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 125.7 (d, JP–C = 8.2 Hz, C), 84.6 (s, C), 82.0 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, CH), 23.3 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 30.62 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 317 (5) (M)+, 315 (4), 291 (11), 290 (95), 289 (53), 274 (17), 259 (11), 243 (28), 243 (13), 241 (13), 239 (13), 228 (24), 212 (34), 197 (11), 194 (17), 183 (45), 165 (51), 139 (18), 77 (100). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C21H17OP [M + H]+, 317.1090; found, 317.1082.
(p-Anisyl)(2-ethynyl-6-methylphenyl]phenylphosphine Oxide (10e)
Compound 5b (0.0505 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-AnMgBr (0.39 mL, 0.195 mmol, 0.5 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 1 h to afford 10e (0.0266 g, 0.0767 mmol, 59% yield) as a yellowish oil. Rf = 0.15 (200:1 CHCl3/MTBE). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.62–7.72 (m, 4H), 7.50–7.53 (m, 1H), 7.40–7.44 (m, 3H), 7.33–7.38 (m, 1H), 7.25–7.27 (m, 1H), 6.94–6.96 (m, 2H), 3.85 (m, 3H), 2.66 (s, 1H), 2.59 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 162.5 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, C), 145.5 (d, JP–C = 7.3 Hz, C), 134.7 (d, JP–C = 108.1 Hz, C), 134.1 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 133.7 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 133.0 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.5 (d, JP–C = 99.9 Hz, C), 131.9 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 131.6 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 130.9 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 128.3 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, 2CH), 125.6 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 113.2 (d, JP–C = 13.6 Hz, 2CH), 84.4 (s, C), 82.2 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, CH), 56.3 (s, CH3), 23.3 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 30.21 (s). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C22H19O2P [M + H]+, 347.1195; found, 347.1205.
(2-Ethynyl-6-methylphenyl)(4-chlorophenyl)phenylphosphine Oxide (10i)
Compound 5b (0.0505 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-Cl–C6H4MgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 1 h to afford 10i (0.0296 g, 0.0845 mmol, 65% yield) as a yellowish oil. Rf = 0.4 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.69–7.73 (m, 2H), 7.63–7.67 (m, 2H), 7.54–7.57 (m, 1H), 7.40–7.47 (m, 5H), 7.36–7.38 (m, 1H), 7.27–7.29 (m, 1H), 2.67 (m, 1H), 2.59 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 145.6 (d, JP–C = 8.2 Hz, C), 138.3 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, C), 133.7 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 133.6 (d, JP–C = 102.6 Hz, C), 133.5 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 133.2 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.9 (d, JP–C = 106.3 Hz, C), 131.9 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.8 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 131.3 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 128.6 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 128.5 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 125.6 (d, JP–C = 8.2 Hz, C), 85.1 (s, C), 82.1 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, CH), 23.3 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.69 (s). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C21H16ClOP [M + H]+, 351.0700; found, 351.0694.
(2-Ethynyl-6-methylphenyl)[p-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]phenylphosphine Oxide (10k)
Compound 5b (0.0505 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-Me2N–C6H4MgBr (0.39 mL, 0.195 mmol, 0.5 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 1 h to afford 10k (0.0327 g, 0.091 mmol, 70% yield) as a brownish waxy solid. Mp: 140.5–144.5 °C. Rf = 0.21 (10:1 CHCl3/MTBE). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.66–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.51–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.47–7.50 (m, 1H), 7.38–7.41 (m, 3H), 7.30–7.33 (m, 1H), 7.23–7.30 (m, 1H), 6.69–6.71 (m, 2H), 3.01 (s, 6H), 2.67 (s, 1H), 2.60 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.5 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, C), 145.3 (d, JP–C = 7.3 Hz, C), 135.6 (d, JP–C = 105.4 Hz, C), 133.6 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 133.5 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, 2CH), 133.2 (d, JP–C = 99.0 Hz, C), 132.9 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 131.9 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 131.3 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, CH), 130.6 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 128.6 (d, JP–C = 101.7 Hz, C), 128.1 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 123.1 (d, JP–C = 8.2 Hz, C), 111.2 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 84.1 (s, C), 82.3 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, CH), 39.9 (s, 2CH3), 23.3 (d, JP–C = 4.5 Hz, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 31.06 (s). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C23H22NOP [M + H]+, 360.1512; found, 360.1515.
(2-Ethynyl-5-chlorophenyl)phenyl(p-tolyl)phosphine Oxide (11a)
Compound 5c (0.053 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-TolMgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 1 h to afford 11a (0.0301 g, 0.086 mmol, 66% yield) as an orange solid. Mp: 160.4–161.8 °C. Rf = 0.45 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.71–7.75 (m, 3H), 7.61–7.66 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.56 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.49 (m, 3H), 7.27–7.30 (m, 2H), 3.02 (m, 1H), 2.43 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 142.8 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, C), 137.3 (d, JP–C = 97.2 Hz, C), 136.1 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 136.1 (d, JP–C = 14.5 Hz, C), 133.7 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.3 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 132.2 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 132.1 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.9 (d, JP–C = 108.9 Hz, C), 131.8 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 129.3 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 128.4 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 128.1 (d, JP–C = 109.9 Hz, C), 123.5 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 85.9 (s, C), 80.8 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 27.47 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 353 (8), 352 (31), 351 (52), 350 (95) (M)+, 349 (91), 331 (8), 302 (12), 273 (27), 268 (25), 258 (13), 256 (12), 252 (23), 244 (17), 230 (14), 215 (22), 212 (14), 210 (13), 199 (13), 196 (15), 194 (22), 189 (29), 176 (25), 165 (31). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C21H16ClOP [M + H]+, 351.0700; found, 351.0693.
(2-Ethynyl-5-chlorophenyl]diphenylphosphine Oxide (11d)
Compound 5c (0.053 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with PhMgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 1 h to afford 11d (0.032 g, 0.095 mmol, 73% yield) as an yellow oil. Rf = 0.48 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.73–7.77 (m, 5H), 7.53–7.59 (m, 3H), 7.46–7.50 (m, 5H), 3.01 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 136.9 (d, JP–C = 98.1 Hz, C), 136.1 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 135.2 (d, JP–C = 14.5 Hz, C), 133.7 (d, JP–C = 9.1 Hz, CH), 132.2 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 4CH), 132.17 (d, JP–C = 4.5 Hz, 2CH), 131.9 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.4 (d, JP–C = 107.2 Hz, 2C), 128.5 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 4CH), 123.5 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 84.9 (s, C), 80.7 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 27.46 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 338 (14), 337 (33), 336 (46) (M)+, 335 (41), 259 (13), 254 (15), 252 (12), 230 (11), 207 (17), 199 (13), 196 (14), 194 (12), 176 (12), 154 (17), 152 (14), 135 (14), 100 (11), 99 (37), 98 (10), 78 (59), 77 (100), 76 (15), 75 (22), 74 (23), 51 (89). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C20H14ClOP [M + H]+, 337.0544; found, 337.0543.
(p-Anisyl)(2-ethynyl-5-chlorophenyl]phenylphosphine Oxide (11e)
Compound 5c (0.053 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-AnMgBr (0.39 mL, 0.195 mmol, 0.5 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 1 h to afford 11e (0.0276 g, 0.0754 mmol, 58% yield) as an orange oil. Rf = 0.54 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.65–7.77 (m, 5H), 7.52–7.56 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.48 (m, 3H), 6.69–6.99 (m, 2H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 3.03 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 162.7 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, C), 137.5 (d, JP–C = 98.1 Hz, C), 136.2 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 135.2 (d, JP–C = 14.5 Hz, C), 134.2 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, 2CH), 133.7 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.2 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 132.0 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, CH), 131.9 (d, JP–C = 108.1 Hz, C), 131.8 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 128.4 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 123.4 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 122.4 (d, JP–C = 113.5 Hz, C), 114.1 (d, JP–C = 13.6 Hz, 2CH), 85.6 (s, C), 80.8 (d, JP–C = 4.5 Hz, CH), 55.4 (s, OCH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 27.26 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 368 (27), 367 (48), 366 (100) (M)+, 365 (76), 353 (13), 351 (23), 289 (24), 283 (11), 252 (10), 245 (12), 239 (15), 217 (12), 199 (25), 182 (11), 176 (19), 170 (10), 152 (11), 151 (10), 141 (14), 139 (11), 138 (10), 123 (37), 110 (11), 108 (24), 107 (13). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C21H16ClO2P [M + H]+, 367.0649; found, 367.0642.
(4-Chlorophenyl)(2-ethynyl-5-chlorophenyl]phenylphosphine Oxide (11i)
Compound 5c (0.053 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-Cl–C6H4MgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 1 h to afford 11i (0.0289 g, 0.078 mmol, 60% yield) as an yellow oil. Rf = 0.47 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.67–7.77 (m, 5H), 7.54–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.51 (m, 5H), 3.04 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 138.7 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, C), 136.3 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 135.4 (d, JP–C = 15.4 Hz, C), 133.7 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 133.6 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 132.4 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 132.1 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 132.1 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 128.8 (d, JP–C = 13.6 Hz, 2CH), 128.6 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 123.3 (d, JP–C = 6.4 Hz, C), 86.2 (s, C), 80.7 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 26.56 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 373 (13), 372 (18), 371 (59), 370 (100) (M)+, 369 (24), 355 (22), 354 (11), 334 (17), 325 (14), 297 (11), 288 (14), 283 (14), 266 (18), 264 (25), 252 (43), 243 (13), 241 (18), 235 (10), 230 (28), 216 (14), 207 (21), 199 (13), 197 (13), 196 (16), 177 (18), 174 (13), 175 (12), 174 (22), 166 (12), 159 (12), 152 (12), 137 (11), 136 (17), 133 (41), 126 (10), 119 (13), 113 (14), 112 (36), 111 (34), 108 (11), 107 (30), 99 (37), 98 (17), 78 (12), 77 (41), 76 (24), 75 (69), 74 (35), 72 (21). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C20H13Cl2OP [M + H]+, 371.0154; found, 371.0145.
(2-Ethynyl-5-chlorophenyl)[p-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]phenyl Phosphine Oxide (11k)
Compound 5c (0.053 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-Me2N–C6H4MgBr (0.39 mL, 0.195 mmol, 0.5 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 1 h to afford 11k (0.0296 g, 0.078 mmol, 60% yield) as an orange oil. Rf = 0.21 (10:1 CHCl3/MTBE). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.77–7.78 (m, 1H), 7.70–7.74 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.58 (m, 4H), 7.43–7.46 (m, 3H), 6.72–6.74 (m, 2H), 3.03 (s, 7H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.4 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, C), 138.1 (d, JP–C = 92.6 Hz, C), 135.9 (d, JP–C = 10.5 Hz, CH), 134.9 (d, JP–C = 14.5 Hz, CH), 133.6 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 133.5 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 132.6 (d, JP–C = 107.2 Hz, C), 132.1 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 131.7 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.4 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 128.2 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 123.1 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, C), 115.2 (d, JP–C = 118.0 Hz, C), 111.1 (d, JP–C = 13.6 Hz, 2C), 85.5 (s, C), 80.9 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH), 39.9 (s, 2CH3).31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 27.79 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 379 (22), 378 (4) (M)+, 377 (9), 362 (10), 292 (12), 281 (41), 253 (15), 208 (24), 207 (100), 193 (13), 191 (18), 135 (12), 133 (17), 95 (12), 73 (29). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C22H19ClNOP [M + H]+, 380.0966; found, 380.0976.
(2-Ethynyl-4-methoxyphenyl]diphenylphosphine Oxide (12d)
Compound 5d (0.0525 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with PhMgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E to afford 12d (0.035 g, 0.107 mmol, 82% yield) as a yellowish solid. Mp: 156.8–157.8 °C. Rf = 0.15 (10:1 CHCl3/MTBE). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.72–7.76 (m, 4H), 7.49–7.56 (m, 3H), 7.44–7.48 (m, 4H), 7.13–7.14 (m, 1H), 6.92–6.94 (m, 1H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 2.99 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 162.0 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, C), 135.8 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.4 (d, JP–C = 107.2 Hz, 2C), 132.2 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 4CH), 131.7 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, 2CH), 128.3 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, 4CH), 126.9 (d, JP–C = 8.2 Hz, C), 125.7 (d, JP–C = 107.2 Hz, C), 120.3 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 114.4 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, C), 84.7 (s, C), 81.7 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH), 55.5 (s, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 28.27 (s). GC–MS (EI) m/z: 333 (22), 332 (100) (M)+, 331 (76), 316 (11), 285 (13), 281 (15), 270 (18), 255 (48), 253 (24), 239 (90), 208 (15), 207 (34), 183 (28), 165 (31), 163 (11), 152 (15), 77 (36). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C21H17O2P [M + H]+, 333.1039; found, 333.1040.
(2-Ethynyl-4-methoxyphenyl)phenyl[p-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]phosphine Oxide (12k)
Compound 5d (0.0525 g, 0.13 mmol) was reacted with p-Me2N–C6H4MgBr (0.39 mL, 0.195 mmol, 0.5 M solution in THF) according to general procedure E for 1 h to afford 12k (0.0311 g, 0.083 mmol, 64% yield) as an orange oil. Rf = 0.57 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.69–7.73 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.62 (m, 4H), 7.40–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.11–7.12 (m, 1H), 6.90–6.92 (m, 1H), 6.69–6.71 (m, 2H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.01 (s, 6H), 2.99 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 161.7 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, C), 152.3 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, C), 135.8 (d, JP–C = 10.8 Hz, CH), 133.9 (d, JP–C = 107.2 Hz, C), 133.6 (d, JP–C = 10.9 Hz, 2CH), 132.2 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 131.2 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 128.1 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 127.3 (d, JP–C = 106.3 Hz, C), 126.7 (d, JP–C = 8.2 Hz, C), 120.1 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 117.0 (d, JP–C = 118.1 Hz, C), 114.2 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 111.2 (d, JP–C = 13.6 Hz, CH), 84.3 (s, C), 81.7 (d, JP–C = 5.5 Hz, CH), 55.5 (s, CH3), 39.9 (s, 2CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 28.45 (s). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C23H22NO2P [M + H]+, 376.1461; found, 376.1460.
Reaction of 5a with p-TolMgBr at −78 °C (General Procedure F)
To a Schlenk tube (25 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirrer and an argon inlet was added phosphine oxide 5a (0.0485 g, 0.13 mmol) in anhydrous THF (2 mL), and the mixture was cooled to −78 °C. Then, p-TolMgBr (0.195 mL, 0.195 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) was added. Then, the reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 30 min. Then, the reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of NH4Cl solution (5 mL) and extracted with CHCl3 (5 × 10 mL). The collected organic phases were dried over Na2SO4, the solid was filtered off, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude reaction mixture was checked using the 31P NMR technique. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using CHCl3/EtOAc/MeOH (30:5:1 v/v) to provide 8a (0.0148 g, 0.047 mmol, 36% yield) and 9.
(2-Ethynylphenyl)(phenyl)((2-(phenyl(p-tolyl)phosphoryl)phenyl)ethynyl)phosphine Oxide (9):
0.0204 g, 0.038 mmol, 29% yield, white solid (EtOAc). Mp: 233–234 °C (dec). Rf = 0.27 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.09–8.17 (m, 1H), 7.78–7.82 (m, 1H), 7.60–7.68 (m, 4H), 7.45–7.75 (m, 10H), 7.33–7.43 (m, 4H), 7.15–7.20 (m, 2H), 3.20 (d, JP–H= 1.89 Hz, 1H), 2.35 (d, JP–H= 5.04 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 142.7 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, C), 136.2 (d, JP–C = 8.2 Hz, CH), 135.4 (d, JP–C = 99.9 Hz, C), 134.4 (dd, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 133.9 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 133.4 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, CH), 132.2 (d, JP–C = 3.6 Hz, CH), 132.1 (d, JP–C = 10.0 Hz, 2CH), 132.07 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 132.06 (d, JP–C = 3.08 Hz, CH), 131.9 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.85 (dd, JP–C = 4.5 Hz, JP–C = 124.4 Hz, C), 131.8 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 131.7 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, CH), 131.6 (d, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, 2CH), 129.9 (d, JP–C = 1.8 Hz, JP–C = 11.8 Hz, CH), 129.32 (d, JP–C = 13.6 Hz, 2CH), 128.5 (d, JP–C = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 128.1 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 128.1 (d, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, CH), 127.4 (d, JP–C = 8.2 Hz, C), 123.9 (dm, C), 102.5 (dd, JP–C = 4.5 Hz, JP–C = 29.1 Hz, C), 89.3 (d, JP–C = 172.6 Hz, C), 85.6 (s, C), 80.7 (dd, JP–C = 2.7 Hz, JP–C = 7.3 Hz, CH), 21.6 (s, CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.41 (d, JP–P = 12.4 Hz), 7.44 (d, JP–P = 12.4 Hz). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C35H26O2P2 [M + H]+, 541.1481; found, 541.1479.
Reaction of 5a with p-TolMgBr in a Higher Scale (General Procedure G)
To a Schlenk tube (25 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirrer and an argon inlet phosphine was added oxide 5a (0.24 g, 0.634 mmol) in anhydrous THF (5 mL), and the mixture was cooled to 0 °C. Then, p-TolMgBr (0.952 mL, 0.952 mmol, 1 M in THF) was added dropwise. Then, the reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h. Then, the reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of NH4Cl solution (5 mL) and extracted with CHCl3 (5 × 5 mL). The collected organic phases were dried over Na2SO4, the solid was filtered off, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude reaction mixture was checked using the 31P{1H} NMR technique. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using CHCl3/EtOAc/MeOH (30:5:1 v/v) as an eluent, yielding (2-ethynylphenyl)phenyl(p-tolyl)phosphine oxide (8a) in 91% yield (0.182 g, 0.577 mmol).
Reaction of 5a with PhLi or EtMgBr (General Procedure H)
To a Schlenk tube (25 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirrer and an argon inlet was added phosphine oxide 5a (0.0405 g, 0.108 mmol) in anhydrous THF (2 mL), and the mixture was cooled to 0 °C. Then, PhLi or EtMgBr (0.164 mmol) was added. Then, the reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 30 min. Then, the reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of NH4Cl solution (5 mL) and extracted with CHCl3 (5 × 10 mL). The collected organic phases were dried over Na2SO4, the solid was filtered off, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude reaction mixture was checked using the 31P{1H} NMR technique. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using CHCl3/MTBE (30:1 v/v).
[2-(Ethynyl)phenyl]diphenylphosphine Oxide (8d)
Compound 5a (0.0405 g, 0.108 mmol) was reacted with PhLi(0.086 mL, 0.164 mmol, 1.9 M solution in n-Bu2O) according to general procedure H to afford 8d (0.007 g, 0.022 mmol, 21% yield).
Ethyl(2-ethynylphenyl)phenylphosphine (13)
Compound 5a (0.0405 g, 0.108 mmol) was reacted with EtMgBr (0.162 mL, 0.162 mmol, 1 M solution in THF) according to general procedure H to afford 13 (0.016 g, 0.063 mmol, 58% yield) as a yellow oil. Rf = 0.35 (30:5:1 CHCl3/AcOEt/MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.18–8.24 (m, 1H), 7.71–7.76 (m, 2H), 7.56–7.91 (m, 1H), 7.46–7.55 (m, 3H), 7.40–7.44 (m, 2H), 3.21 (s, 1H), 2.71–2.80 (m, 1H), 2.51–2.61 (m, 1H), 1.20 (dt, JH–H = 7.72 Hz, JH–P= 17.9 Hz, 3H). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): δ 34.50 (s). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 134.7 (d, JC–P = 8.62 Hz, CH), 133.9 (d, JC–P = 92.6 Hz, C), 133.8 (d, JC–P = 6.8 Hz, CH), 133.1 (d JC–P = 99.9 Hz, C), 131.6 (d, JC–P = 2.5 Hz, CH), 131.5 (d, JC–P = 2.5 Hz, CH), 130.9 (d, JC–P = 9.99 Hz, 2CH), 128.9 (d, JC–P = 10.0 Hz, CH), 128.3 (d, JC–P = 12.7 Hz, 2CH), 123.2 (d, JC–P = 8.2 Hz, C), 84.2 (s, C), 82.3 (d, JC–P = 4.5 Hz, CH), 21.0 (d, JC–P = 72.7 Hz, CH2), 5.59 (d, JC–P = 5.5 Hz, CH3). GC–MS (EI) m/z: (%) 255 (9), 254 (49) (M)+, 253 (9), 226 (35), 225 (100), 179 (17), 178 (30), 165 (17), 152 (12), 149 (11), 77 (25). HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: calcd for C32H30O2P2Na [2M + Na]+, 531.1619; found, 531.1628.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the National Centre of Science (Narodowe Centrum Nauki) in Poland (2018/02/X/ST5/00635). S.S. thanks Prof. K. M. Pietrusiewicz for kindly reading the manuscript. Sylwia Sowa wish to thank Prof. Marek Stankevič for the discussions and for reading the manuscript.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01629.
1H NMR, 13C{1H} NMR, 31P{1H} NMR, and 19F NMR spectra for all products, crystallographic data (PDF)
Accession Codes
CCDC 2094907 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- a Stang P. J.; Diederich F.. Modern Acetylene Chemistry; Wiley VCH, 1995; pp 1–26. [Google Scholar]; b Diederich F.; Stang P. J.; Tykwinski R. R.. Acetylene Chemistry: Chemistry, Biology and Material Science; Wiley VCH, 2005; pp 1–42. [Google Scholar]; c Trost B. M.; Li C.-J.. Modern Alkyne Chemistry: Catalytic and Atom-Economic Transformations; Wiley VCH, 2015; pp 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Trofimov B. A.; Schmidt E. Y. Acetylenes in the superbase-promoted assembly of carbocycles and heterocycles. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51 (5), 1117–1130. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Jimenez-Nunez E.; Echavarren A. M. Molecular diversity through gold catalysis with alkynes. Chem. Commun. 2007, 333–346. 10.1039/B612008C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Uruvakili A.; Gangadhararao G.; Kumara Swamy K. C. Gold(I) catalysed sequential dehydrative cyclisation/intermolecular [4 + 2] cycloaddition of alkynyldienols onto activated alkynes/alkenes: a facile route to substituted norbornadienes/norbornenes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 10060–10071. 10.1039/C5OB01458A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Zhang C.; Hong K.; Dong S.; Pei C.; Zhang X.; He C.; Hu W.; Xu X. Gold(I)-catalyzed aromatization: expeditious synthesis of polyfunctionalized naphthalenes. iScience 2019, 21, 499–508. 10.1016/j.isci.2019.10.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tan Q. W.; Chovatia P.; Willis M. C. Copper-catalysed synthesis of alkylidene 2-pyrrolinone derivatives from the combination of α-keto amides and alkynes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 7797–7800. 10.1039/C8OB02205D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Zhou R.; Wang W.; Jiang Z.-J.; Wang K.; Zheng X.-L.; Fu H.-Y.; Chen H.; Li R.-X. One-pot synthesis of 2-substituted benzo[b]furans via Pd–tetraphosphine catalyzed coupling of 2-halophenols with alkynes. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 6023–6026. 10.1039/C4CC00815D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b De S.; Jash M.; Chowdhury C. Palladium(II) catalysed cascade strategy for the synthesis of dibenzo[5,6:7,8]cycloocta[1,2-b]indol-10-ols/-10(15H)-ones: easy access to 1,3,5,7-cyclooctatetraenes (COTs). Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 15659–15662. 10.1039/D0CC06538B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Wang J.; Wang G.; Cheng X.; Liu Y.; Zhang J. Sequential Sonogashira/intramolecular aminopalladation/cross-coupling of ortho-ethynyl-anilines catalyzed by a single palladium source: rapid access to 2,3-diarylindoles. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 1329–1333. 10.1039/D0OB02295K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Wan S.-H.; Liu S.-T. Functionalized pyrroles from vinylaziridines and alkynes via rhodium-catalyzed domino ring-opening cyclization followed by C = C bond migration. Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 1166–1170. 10.1016/j.tet.2019.01.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Burnie A. J.; Evans P. A. Rhodium-catalyzed [(3 + 2)+1] carbocyclizations of alkynylidenecyclopropanes with carbon monoxide: construction of polysubstituted bicyclohexa-2,5-dienones. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 7621–7624. 10.1039/C8CC02269K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Zhou X.; Huang F.; Tang C.; Zhuo Q.; Chen Z.; Zhang H.; Xia H. A missing member of conjugated N-heterocycles: realizing pyrido[1,2-α]azepine by reacting ruthenium alkenylcarbene complex with alkyne. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 4009–4012. 10.1039/C8CC00758F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Ilies L.; Arslanoglu Y.; Matsubara T.; Nakamura E. Iron-catalyzed synthesis of indenones through cyclization of carboxamides with alkynes. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2018, 7 (7), 1327–1329. 10.1002/ajoc.201800200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Roldan-Molina E.; Nievas M. M.; Navarro J. A. R.; Oltra J. E. CpTiCl2-Catalyzed cross-coupling between Internal Alkynes and Ketones: A Novel Concept in the synthesis of halogenated, conjugated dienes. Chem. - Eur. J. 2020, 26 (37), 8296–8301. 10.1002/chem.202001023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Chang X.; Zhang J.; Peng L.; Guo C. Collective synthesis of acetylenic pharmaceuticals via enantioselective Nickel/Lewis acid-catalyzed propargylic alkylation. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 299. 10.1038/s41467-020-20644-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Talele T. T. Acetylene group, friend or foe in medicinal chemistry. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 5625–5663. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Jiang X.; Hao X.; Jing L.; Wu G.; Kang D.; Liu X.; Zhan P. Recent applications of click chemistry in drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2019, 14 (8), 779–789. 10.1080/17460441.2019.1614910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Meldal M.; Diness F. Recent Fascinating Aspects of the CuAACClick Reaction. Trends in Chemistry 2020, 2 (6), 569–584. 10.1016/j.trechm.2020.03.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Li Y.; Wang X.; Han Y.; Sun H.-Y.; Hilborn J.; Shi L. Click chemistry-based biopolymeric hydrogels for regenerative medicine. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 16, 022003. 10.1088/1748-605X/abc0b3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Flaxman H. A.; Miyamoto D. K.; Woo C. M. Small molecule interactome mapping by photo-affinity labeling (SIM-PAL) to identify binding sites of small molecules on a proteome-wide scale. Current Protocols in Chemical Biology 2019, 11, e75. 10.1002/cpch.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Croce S.; Serdjukow S.; Carell T.; Frischmuth T. Chemoenzymatic preparation of functional click-labeled messenger RNA. ChemBioChem 2020, 21 (11), 1641–1646. 10.1002/cbic.201900718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Welling M. M.; Duszenko N.; van Willigen D. M.; Hensbergen A. W.; Buckle T.; Rietbergen D. D. D.; Roestenberg M.; van Leeuwen F. W. B. Interventional nuclear medicine: “click” chemistry as an in vivo targeting strategy for imaging microspheres and bacteria. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 1683–1690. 10.1039/D0BM01823F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Song S.; Ko Y.-G.; Lee H.; Wi D.; Ree B. J; Li Y.; Michinobu T.; Ree M. High-performance triazole-containing brush polymers via azide–alkyne click chemistry: a new functional polymer platform for electrical memory devices. NPG Asia Mater. 2015, 7, e228. 10.1038/am.2015.130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Marrocchi A.; Facchetti A.; Lanari D.; Santoro S.; Vaccaro L. Click-chemistry approaches to π-conjugated polymers for organic electronics applications. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 6298–6308. 10.1039/C6SC01832G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Mateos-Gil J.; Calbo J.; Rodríguez-Pérez L.; Herranz M. Á.; Ortí E.; Martín N. Carbon nanotubes conjugated with triazole-based tetrathiafulvalene-type receptors for C60 recognition. ChemPlusChem 2019, 84 (6), 730–739. 10.1002/cplu.201900078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Sebastian M.; Ganesan A.; Behbehani H.; Husain A.; Makhseed S. Ultrafast nonlinear optical characteristics of pyrene-conjugated azaphthalocyanines with optical limiting behavior. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 21740–21750. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06565. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- a Ortiz M.; Yu C.; Jin Y.; Zhang W. Poly(aryleneethynylene)s: Properties, Applications and Synthesis Through Alkyne Metathesis. Top Curr. Chem. (Z) 2017, 375, 69. 10.1007/s41061-017-0156-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Higashino T.; Kurumisawa Y.; Nimura S.; Iiyama H.; Imahori H. Enhanced donor−π–acceptor character of a porphyrin dye incorporating naphthobisthiadiazole for efficient near-infrared light absorption. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 2018 (20–21), 2537–2547. 10.1002/ejoc.201701736. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Mogensen J.; Michaels H.; Roy R.; Broløs L.; Kilde M. D.; Freitag M.; Nielsen M. B. Indenofluorene-extended tetrathiafulvalene scaffolds for dye-sensitized solar cells. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 2020 (38), 6127–6134. 10.1002/ejoc.202001058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Yenilmez H. Y.; Sahin A. N.; Altındal A.; Bayır Z. A. Photosensitive field effect transistor based on metallo-phthalocyanines containing (4-pentylphenyl)ethynyl moieties. Synth. Met. 2021, 273, 116690. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116690. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Sessler J. L.; Wang X.; Xie L.; Lin K.; Ma W.; Zhao T.; Ji X.; Khashab N. M.; Alyami M.; Wang H. Calix[4]pyrrole-crosslinked porous polymeric networks for micropollutant removal from water. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (13), 7188–7196. 10.1002/anie.202016364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Wu Y.; Zang Y.; Xu L.; Wang J.; Jia H.; Miao F. Synthesis of functional conjugated microporous polymer/TiO2 nanocomposites and the mechanism of the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 7936–7950. 10.1007/s10853-021-05790-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z.-H.; Dong X.-Y.; Du X.-Y.; Gu Q.-S.; Li Z.-L.; Liu X.-Y. Copper-catalyzed enantioselective Sonogashira-type oxidative cross-coupling of unactivated C(sp3)–H bonds with alkynes. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5689. 10.1038/s41467-019-13705-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mohajer F.; Heravi M. M.; Zadsirjan V.; Poormohammad N. Copper-free Sonogashira cross-coupling reactions: an overview. RSC Adv. 2021, 11 (12), 6885–6925. 10.1039/D0RA10575A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Yang Q.; Zhou Y.; Chen J.; He X.; Xu J.; Kwong F. Y.; Fan B. Pd-Catalyzed allylic alkynylation of allylic acetates with terminal alkynes. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 2015 (24), 5330–5333. 10.1002/ejoc.201500522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Ha H.; Shin C.; Bae S.; Joo J. M. Divergent palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling of nitropyrazoles with terminal alkynes. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 2018 (20–21), 2645–2650. 10.1002/ejoc.201800166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Huang W.-Y.; Lu C.-H.; Ghorai S.; Li B.; Li C. Regio- and enantioselective allylic alkylation of terminal alkynes by synergistic Rh/Cu catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (36), 15276–15281. 10.1021/jacs.0c08283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Tsui G. C.; Ma Q.; Wang Y. Stereoselective palladium-catalyzed C–F bond alkynylation of tetrasubstituted gem-difluoroalkenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59 (28), 11293–11297. 10.1002/anie.202002219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Della-Felice F.; Zanini M.; Jie X.; Tan E.; Echavarren A. M. Rhodium(III)-catalyzed synthesis of skipped enynes via C(sp3)–H alkynylation of terminal alkenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (11), 5693–5698. 10.1002/anie.202014877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Sun M.; Liu M.; Li C. Rhodium-catalyzed chemodivergent regio- and enantioselective allylic alkylation of indoles. Chem. - Eur. J. 2021, 27 (10), 3457–3462. 10.1002/chem.202004613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rawe B. W.; Scott M. R.; Brown C. M.; MacKenzie H. K.; Gates D. P. Poly(p-phenylenediethynylene phosphine)s and related pi-conjugated phosphine-diyne polymers: synthesis, characterization and photophysical Properties. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 8916–8927. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01933. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peng L.; Xu F.; Suzuma Y.; Orita A.; Otera J. One-pot transformation of Ph2P(O)-protected ethynes: deprotection followed by transition metal-catalyzed coupling. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78 (24), 12802–12808. 10.1021/jo402176w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Doherty S.; Knight J. G.; Perry D. O.; Ward N. A. B.; Bittner D. M.; McFarlane W.; Wills C.; Probert M. R. Triaryl-like MONO-, BIS-, and TRISKITPHOS phosphines: synthesis, solution NMR studies, and a comparison in gold-catalyzed carbon-heteroatom bond forming 5-exo-dig and 6-endo-dig cyclizations. Organometallics 2016, 35, 1265–1278. 10.1021/acs.organomet.6b00146. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Slowinski F.; Aubert C.; Malacria M. J. Diastereoselective cobalt-mediated [2 + 2+2] cycloadditions of substituted linear enediynes phosphine oxides: scope and limitations. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 378–386. 10.1021/jo026212r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melen R. L.; Stephan D. W. Cycloaddition reactions between dicyclohexylboron azide and alkynes. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 4795–4798. 10.1039/c3dt00068k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Zhang Y.; Hu G.; Ma D.; Xu P.; Gao Y.; Zhao Y. TBAI-catalyzed oxidative C–H functionalization: a new route to benzo[b]phosphole oxides. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 2815–2818. 10.1039/C5CC09263A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Ma D.; Pan J.; Yin L.; Xu P.; Gao Y.; Yin Y.; Zhao Y. Copper-catalyzed direct oxidative C–H functionalization of unactivated cycloalkanes into cycloalkyl benzo[b]phosphole oxides. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3455–3459. 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Liu L.; Dong J.; Yan Y.; Yin S.-F.; Han L.-B.; Zhou Y. Photoredox-catalyzed decarboxylative alkylation/cyclization of alkynylphosphine oxides: a metal- and oxidant-free method for accessing benzo[b]phosphole oxides. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 233–236. 10.1039/C8CC08689C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Métivier R.; Amengual R.; Leray I.; Michelet V.; Genêt J.-P. Novel fluorophores: efficient synthesis and photophysical properties. Org. Lett. 2004, 6 (5), 739–742. 10.1021/ol036399o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Häussler M.; Zheng R.; Lam J. W. Y.; Tong H.; Dong H.; Tang B. Z. Hyperbranched polyynes: syntheses, photoluminescence, light refraction, thermal curing, metal complexation, pyrolytic ceramization, and soft magnetization. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 10645–10650. 10.1021/jp047857t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Ha-Thi M.-H.; Souchon V.; Hamdi A.; Métivier R.; Alain V.; Nakatani K.; Lacroix P. G.; Genêt J.-P.; Michelet V.; Leray I. Synthesis of novel rod-shaped and star-shaped fluorescent phosphane oxides-nonlinear optical properties and photophysical properties. Chem. - Eur. J. 2006, 12, 9056–9065. 10.1002/chem.200600464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Samb I.; Bell J.; Toullec P. Y.; Michelet V.; Leray I. Fluorescent phosphane selenide as efficient mercury chemodosimeter. Org. Lett. 2011, 13 (5), 1182–1185. 10.1021/ol200066p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiao S.; Huang W.; Du Z.; Chen X.; Shieh F.-K.; Yang R. Phosphine oxide-based conjugated microporous polymers with excellent CO2 capture properties. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 136–141. 10.1039/C4NJ01477D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Biagiotti G.; Langé V.; Ligi C.; Caporali S.; Muniz-Miranda M.; Flis A.; Pietrusiewicz K. M.; Ghini G.; Brandi A.; Cicchi S. Nanostructured carbon materials decorated with organophosphorus moieties: synthesis and application. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 485–493. 10.3762/bjnano.8.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Smith C. D.; Baxendale I. R.; Tranmer G. K.; Baumann M.; Smith S. C.; Lewthwaite R. A.; Ley S. V. Tagged phosphine reagents to assist reaction work-up by phase-switched scavenging using a modular flow reactor. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 1562–1568. 10.1039/b703033a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Maugeri L.; Lebl T.; Cordes D. B.; Slawin A. M. Z.; Philp D. Cooperative binding in a phosphine oxide-based halogen bonded dimer drives supramolecular oligomerization. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 1986–1995. 10.1021/acs.joc.6b02822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Winter W. Photochemische cyclisierung von o,o′-bis(phenyläthinyl)-triphenylphosphin zum phosphindol-system. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16, 3913–3914. 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)91252-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Butters T.; Winter W. Synthese von Triphenylphosphan-en-inen und Phosphindolen sowie Röntgenstrukturanalyse von zwei Phosphindolen. Chem. Ber. 1984, 117, 990–1002. 10.1002/cber.19841170313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Tsuji H.; Sato K.; Ilies L.; Itoh Y.; Sato Y.; Nakamura E. Modular synthesis of benzo[b]phosphole derivatives via BuLi-mediated cyclization of (o-alkynylphenyl)phosphine. Org. Lett. 2008, 10 (11), 2263–2265. 10.1021/ol800684x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Sanji T.; Shiraishi K.; Kashiwabara T.; Tanaka M. Base-mediated cyclization reaction of 2-alkynylphenylphosphine oxides: synthesis and photophysical properties of benzo[b]phosphole oxides. Org. Lett. 2008, 10 (13), 2689–2692. 10.1021/ol800841v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Xu Y.; Wang Z.; Gan Z.; Xi Q.; Duan Z.; Mathey F. Versatile synthesis of phospholides from open-chain precursors. Application to annelated pyrrole- and silole-phosphole rings. Org. Lett. 2015, 17 (7), 1732–1734. 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Zhao X.; Gan Z.; Hu C.; Duan Z.; Mathey F. Planar polycyclic oxaphosphoranes incorporating a benzophosphole unit. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 5814–5817. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Winter W. 2,2″-Bis(diphenylphosphino)-2′,3,5′,6′-tetraphenylpterphenyl als Aren-Chelat-Ligand fur Rhodium(1). Angew. Chem. 1976, 88, 260. 10.1002/ange.19760880812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Vedejs E.; Steck P. L. Unusual oxaphosphoranes by acyl transfer from o-acetoxy-o′-diphenylphosphanyltolane. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38 (18), 2788–2791. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Song Y.; Wang L.; Duan Z.; Mathey F. Divergent intramolecular reactions between phosphines and alkynes. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31 (2), 329–332. 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.05.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- a Belmonte Sánchez E.; Iglesias M. J.; El Hajjouji H.; Roces L.; García-Granda S.; Villuendas P.; Urriolabeitia E. P.; Ortiz L. F. Cycloaurated phosphinothioic amide complex as a precursor of gold(I) nanoparticles: efficient catalysts for A3 synthesis of propargylamines under solvent-free conditions. Organometallics 2017, 36 (10), 1962–1973. 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Mahamulkar S. G.; Císařová I.; Jahn U. New phosphine ligand architectures lead to efficient gold catalysts for cycloisomerization reactions at very low loading. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360 (21), 4215–4224. 10.1002/adsc.201800938. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hu W.; Li E.-Q.; Duan Z.; Mathey F. Concise synthesis of phospholene and its P-stereogenic derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 14772–14778. 10.1021/acs.joc.0c00545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doherty S.; Knight J. G.; Smyth C. H.; Harrington R. W.; Clegg W. Rhodium-catalyzed double [2 + 2+2] cycloaddition of 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphinoyl)buta-1,3-diyne with tethered diynes: A modular, highly versatile single-pot synthesis of NU-BIPHEP biaryl diphosphines. Org. Lett. 2007, 9 (23), 4925–4928. 10.1021/ol702390p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Peng A.-Y.; Zhang X.-Y.; Ding Y.-X. A convenient and applicable route to synthesize 2-(1-alkynyl)phenylphosphonates. Heteroat. Chem. 2005, 16 (6), 529–534. 10.1002/hc.20156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Peng A.-Y.; Ding Y.-X. Synthesis of phosphaisocoumarins via iodocyclization. Org. Lett. 2004, 6 (7), 1119–1121. 10.1021/ol0499506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Peng A.-Y.; Ding Y.-X. The synthesis of phosphaisocoumarins by Cu(I)-catalyzed intramolecular cyclization of o-ethynylphenylphosphonic acid monoesters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15006–15007. 10.1021/ja038627f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Peng A.-Y.; Ding Y.-X. Synthesis of 4-halophosphaisocoumarins via halocyclization of 2-(1-alkynyl)phenylphosphonates. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 10303–10308. 10.1016/j.tet.2005.08.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao Z.; Peng A.-Y. Palladium(II) acetate catalyzed cyclization–coupling of (o-ethynylphenyl)phosphonic acid monoesters with allyl halides. Synthesis 2019, 51 (18), 3499–3505. 10.1055/s-0039-1689936. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sheldrick G. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr. 2008, 64, 112–122. 10.1107/S0108767307043930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farrugia L. WinGX and ORTEP for Windows: an update. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2012, 45, 849–854. 10.1107/S0021889812029111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stankevič M.; Włodarczyk A. Efficient copper(I)-catalyzed coupling of secondary phosphine oxides with aryl halides. Tetrahedron 2013, 69 (1), 73–81. 10.1016/j.tet.2012.10.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Azevedo C. M. G.; Afonso C. M. M.; Soares J. X.; Reis S.; Sousa D.; Lima R. T.; Vasconcelos M. H.; Pedro M.; Barbosa J.; Gales L.; Pinto M. M. M. Pyranoxanthones: Synthesis, growth inhibitory activity on human tumor cell lines and determination of their lipophilicity in two membrane models. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 69, 798–816. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masurier N.; Estour F.; Froment M.-T.; Lefevre B.; Debouzy J.-C.; Brasme B.; Masson P.; Lafont O. Synthesis of 2-substituted β-cyclodextrin derivatives with a hydrolytic activity against the organophosphorylester paraoxon. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 40 (7), 615–623. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2005.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawai J.; Chikkade K. P.; Shimizu Y.; Kanai M. In situ catalytic generation of allylcopper species for asymmetric allylation: Toward 1H-isochromene skeletons. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52 (28), 7177–7180. 10.1002/anie.201302027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mülbaier M.; Giannis A. First synthesis and oxidative properties of polymer-supported IBX. ARKIVOC 2003, 2003, 228–236. 10.3998/ark.5550190.0004.624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakazaki A.; Mori A.; Kobayashi S.; Nishikawa T. A Divergent approach to the diastereoselective synthesis of 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles from atropisomeric N-aryl oxindole derivatives. Chem. - Asian J. 2016, 11 (22), 3267–3274. 10.1002/asia.201601183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gavara L.; Petit C.; Montchamp J.-L. DBU-promoted alkylation of alkyl phosphinates and H-phosphonates. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 5000–5003. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.07.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.











