Abstract
Intracranial chondrosarcomas located in the region of the posterior clinoid process have not been focused on. Here, we report the case of a 29-year-old woman with a skull base tumor in that region. Seven years after the diagnosis, the tumor had grown and showed calcification and tumor stain; chondrosarcoma, posterior clinoid meningioma, and chordoma were suspected. The patient underwent subtotal tumor resection, and the histopathological study revealed that the tumor was a low-grade chondrosarcoma. Chondrosarcomas can be located in the region of the posterior clinoid process, and not only chordomas but also posterior clinoid meningiomas should be considered as a differential diagnosis of tumors located in that region, especially when the tumor has calcification or receives a vascular supply.
Keywords: Chondrosarcoma, Posterior clinoid process, Posterior clinoid meningioma, Chordoma
Introduction
Intracranial chondrosarcomas are rare, accounting for 0.16% of all intracranial tumors and 6.15% of all skull base tumors [1]. Chondrosarcomas arise in several skull base regions [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], but location in the region of the posterior clinoid process (PCP) is uncommon for them. Conversely, meningiomas and chordomas located around that region have been reported [7], [8], [9], [10]. Here, we report a case of an intracranial chondrosarcoma located in the region of the PCP that was difficult to be precisely diagnosed using radiological findings. We also discuss the differences in radiological features among tumors located in that region.
Case report
A 29-year-old woman presented with transient diplopia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a 15 × 15 × 21 mm well-defined lesion in the region of the right PCP that showed hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging (Fig. 1A) and heterogeneous contrast enhancement (Fig. 1B–D). Although radiological follow-up was planned, the patient did not come to the next appointment. Seven years later, the patient presented with headaches. Neurological examination revealed no focal deficit, however, MRI revealed that the lesion had grown in size to 38 × 25 × 34 mm (Fig. 2). The lesion showed iso- to hypointensity on T2-weighted imaging (Fig. 2A); this change in the intensity might be associated with the calcification during the last 7 years. The right posterior cerebral artery and oculomotor nerve were displaced posteriorly, whereas the right internal carotid artery and optic chiasm were displaced anteriorly (Fig. 2A–B). Computed tomography (CT) showed a calcified lesion (Fig. 3A) and blistering of the right PCP (Fig. 3B). Digital subtraction angiography showed that the lesion received a vascular supply from the right meningohypophyseal trunk (Fig. 3C). Several types of tumors, such as chondrosarcoma, posterior clinoid meningioma, and chordoma, were suspected.
Fig. 1.
Initial magnetic resonance image of a 15 × 15 × 21 mm lesion in the region of the right posterior clinoid process showing hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging (A; axial). Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging shows heterogeneous enhancement of the lesion (B; axial, C; coronal, D; sagittal)
Fig. 2.
Magnetic resonance imaging performed 7 years after the initial study. T2-weighted (A; axial, B; axial thin slice) and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images (C; axial, D; coronal, E; sagittal) show that the lesion had grown in size to 38 × 25 × 34 mm. The lesion shows iso- to hypointensity on T2-weighted imaging (A). The right posterior cerebral artery (A; arrowhead) and oculomotor nerve (B; arrowhead) were displaced posteriorly, whereas the right internal carotid artery (B; thin arrow) and optic chiasm (B; thick arrow) were displaced anteriorly
Fig. 3.
Preoperative radiological studies. Computed tomography shows a calcified lesion (A) and blistering of the right posterior clinoid process (B; arrowhead). Digital subtraction angiography shows a vascular supply from the right meningohypophyseal trunk (C; arrowhead)
The lesion was resected through a right-sided pterional approach. Most of the lesion was elastic hard with calcification, and a piecemeal removal was performed including the part of the lesion adhering to the right PCP. Finally, the patient underwent subtotal extracavernous resection.
Histopathological examination revealed a lobulated architecture with sporadic proliferation of atypical chondrocytes of various sizes or double nuclei in abundant myxoid matrix (Fig. 4A–C). Immunohistochemistry showed positivity for S-100 protein (Fig. 4D) and SOX9 (Fig. 4E) but negativity for CAM 5.2 (Fig. 4F). These findings were compatible with low-grade chondrosarcoma.
Fig. 4.
Histopathological examination. Hematoxylin and eosin staining reveals a lobulated architecture with sporadic proliferation of atypical chondrocytes of various sizes or double nuclei in abundant myxoid matrix (A, × 20, B, × 40, C, × 100). Immunohistochemical analysis shows positivity for S-100 protein (D, × 100) and SOX9 (E, × 100) but negativity for CAM 5.2 (F, × 100)
Although the patient exhibited mild right-sided oculomotor palsy and left-sided hemiparesis after surgery, both signs disappeared in 3 months. MRI performed 5 months after surgery showed tiny remnants of the lesion in the cavernous sinus (Fig. 5), for which radiosurgical treatment was planned.
Fig. 5.
Magnetic resonance imaging performed 5 months after surgery. T2-weighted (A; axial) and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images (B; axial, C; coronal, D; sagittal) show tiny remnants of the lesion in the cavernous sinus
Discussion
In the present case, the right posterior cerebral artery and oculomotor nerve were displaced posteriorly, whereas the right internal carotid artery and optic chiasm were displaced anteriorly. Moreover, blistering of the right PCP was observed. Similar radiological findings were observed in the cases of posterior clinoid meningioma [7,8]; therefore, those features support the notion that the lesion of the present case was located in the region of the PCP.
Chondrosarcomas located in the region of the PCP have not been well characterized (Table 1). In contrast, several cases of posterior clinoid meningioma have been reported. Posterior clinoid meningiomas usually show iso- to hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging and homogenous enhancement [7], [8], [9]. However, meningiomas with calcification (observed in up to 20% of them) can reveal hypointensity on T2-weighted imaging or heterogeneous enhancement, similar to the present case [11,12]. Moreover, intracranial chondrosarcomas often reveal an avascular mass on digital subtraction angiography, which is different from the findings in the present case (Table 1). Conversely, most skull base meningiomas receive a vascular supply, although information on the tumor stain of posterior clinoid meningiomas is limited [7], [8], [9],13]. In the present case, the calcification and vascular supply made establishing an accurate preoperative diagnosis more difficult.
Table 1.
Summary of cases of skull base chondrosarcoma.
| Authors | Age (year)/Sex | Location | Radiological features |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intensity on | Enhancement | Calcification | Tumor | |||
| T2-weighted imaging | stain | |||||
| Charason et al. [2] | 61/female | Petrous apex | NA | NA | NA | - |
| 58/female | Petrous apex | Hyper | NA | NA | - | |
| Furuno et al.[3] | 27/female | Paranasal sinus | NA | Heterogenous | + | - |
| 44/male | Middle fossa | NA | - | + | - | |
| Mishima et al. [1] | 20/male | Paranasal sinus | Hyper | Heterogenous | + | + |
| 13/female | Cavernous sinus | Hyper | Heterogenous | + | - | |
| Miyamori et al. [4] | 54/male | Middle fossa | - | + | + | - |
| Morimoto et al. [5] | 25/male | Parasellar | NA | NA | + | - |
| 37/female | Posterior fossa | NA | NA | NA | - | |
| 26/male | Parasellar | Hypo | - | + | - | |
| 39/female | Temporal bone | Hyper | Heterogenous | NA | + | |
| 21/female | Paranasal sinus | Hyper | Heterogenous | + | + | |
| 31/male | Clivus | Hyper | Heterogenous | + | - | |
| Watanabe et al. [6] | 36/female | Middle fossa | Hyper | Heterogenous | - | - |
| Present case | 29/female | Posterior clinoid process | Hyper → iso-hypo | Heterogenous | + | + |
NA, not available.
In addition, chordomas are difficult to distinguish from chondrosarcomas without pathological examination, although chordomas are generally located more centrally than chondrosarcomas [14]. Among cases of skull base chordoma, 80% of them show posterior clinoid involvement [10]. Furthermore, the features of chordomas on CT or MRI are similar to those of chondrosarcomas, such as calcification, bone destruction, hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging, and rarity of the tumor stain [10,14,15].
Note that chondrosarcomas can be located in the region of the PCP, and distinguishing them from posterior clinoid meningiomas and chordomas would be difficult, especially when the tumor has calcification or receives a vascular supply.
Footnotes
Acknowledgment: The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.
Competing Interest: None
Patient Consent: The patient has provided consent to the submission of the case report to the journal.
Contributor Information
Tomomichi Kayahara, Email: goyanorasetsu@gmail.com.
Hiroki Kurita, Email: hk0836@5931.saitama-med.ac.jp.
Keiko Irie, Email: kirie@kaikou.or.jp.
Ichiro Nakahara, Email: ichiro@mub.biglobe.ne.jp.
Tomio Sasaki, Email: tsasaki@ns.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
References
- 1.Mishima K, Matsutani M, Nakamura M, Hibi T, Nakamura O, Shitara N, Hunata N. Clinical experiences in treating chondrosarcomas of the skull base. Jpn J Neurosurg (Tokyo) 1992;1:348–354. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Charachon R, Gratacap B, Lavieille J. Chondrosarcomas of the petrous apex. Skull Base Surg. 1992;2:171–175. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1057130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Furuno M, chondrosarcoma Waga S.Intracranial. Report of two cases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1984;24:123–128. doi: 10.2176/nmc.24.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Miyamori T, Mizukoshi H, Yamano K, Takayanagi N, Sugino M, Hayase H, Ito H. Intracranial chondrosarcoma—case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1990;30:263–267. doi: 10.2176/nmc.30.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Morimoto T, Sasaki T, Takakura K, Ishida T. Chondrosarcoma of the skull base: report of six cases. Skull Base Surg. 1992;2:177–185. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1057131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Watanabe K, Seo Y, Ito T, Sasaki T, Nakagawara J, Hara K. A case of giant chondrosarcoma in the middle fossa. Journal of Hokkaido Brain Research Foundation. 2006;17:29–33. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shukla D, Gangadharan J, Kakati A, Devi BI. Posterior clinoid process meningioma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115:1517–1519. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sodhi HB, Singla N, Gupta SK. Posterior clinoid meningioma: a case report with discussion on terminology and surgical approach. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6(21) doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.151261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Takase H, Kawasaki T, Tateishi K, Yokoyama TA, Murata H, Kawahara N. Characteristics and surgical strategies for posterior clinoid process meningioma: two case reports and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40:163–169. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0774-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Van Gompel JJ, Janus JR. Chordoma and chondrosarcoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015;48:501–514. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2015.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.O'Leary S, Adams WM, Parrish RW, Mukonoweshuro W. Atypical imaging appearances of intracranial meningiomas. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Watts J, Box G, Galvin A, Brotchie P, Trost N, Sutherland T. Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:113–122. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0302-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Waldron JS, Sughrue ME, Hetts SW, Wilson SP, Mills SA, McDermott MW. Embolization of skull base meningiomas and feeding vessels arising from the internal carotid circulation. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:162–169. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181fe2de9. discussion 169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sato S, Nabeshima K, Sato Y, Ohno A, Hinoura Y, Sameshima T. A case of intracranial chondrosarcoma, with special reference to cytologic differentiation from chordoma and chondroid chordoma. J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol. 2001;40:139–143. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Erdem E, Angtuaco E, Van Hemert R, Park J, Al-Mefty O. Comprehensive review of intracranial chordoma. Radiographics. 2003;23:995–1009. doi: 10.1148/rg.234025176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





