Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 22.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2021 May 13;74:153178. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2021.153178

Refinement of Covalent EGFR Inhibitor AZD9291 to Eliminate Off-target Activity

Elise Bouffard 1, Balyn W Zaro 1, Melissa M Dix 1, Benjamin Cravatt 1,*, Chi-Huey Wong 1,*
PMCID: PMC8577418  NIHMSID: NIHMS1703997  PMID: 34764521

Abstract

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major disease that accounts for 85% of all lung cancer cases which claimed around 1.8 billion lives worldwide in 2020. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target EGFR have been used for the treatment of NSCLC, but often develop drug resistance, and the covalent inhibitor AZD9291 has been developed to tackle the problem of drug resistance mediated by the T790M EGFR mutation; however, there is a side effect of hyperglycemia that may be due to off-target activity. This study examines analogues of AZD9291 by chemical proteomics, identifying analogues that maintain T790M-EGFR engagement while showing reduced cross-reactivity with off-targets.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1703997-f0001.jpg

Introduction

The tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR is a well-known target for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and several generations of inhibitors have been developed. However, resistance against these therapies has emerged, especially due to the T790M mutation. To overcome this problem, new irreversible inhibitors have been developed to target an active-site cysteine residue, and the compound AZD9291 developed by AstraZeneca belongs to this class of inhibitors1 (Fig. 1) . This orally active, potent T790M-EGFR inhibitor has been approved by the FDA as a second line treatment for patients with T790M EGFR NSCLC. However, in the phase I/II clinical trials, this compound has shown an unusual side effect of hyperglycemia,2 suggesting that AZD9291 has off-target inhibition activity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Structure of AZD9291 and library compounds.

Since cysteines perform many functions in diverse protein classes, irreversible EGFR inhibitors may affect the activity of proteins outside of the kinome, potentially leading to target-independent side effects. Indeed, the Cravatt laboratory has demonstrated that some irreversible EGFR inhibitors, including AZD9291, have off-target reactivity across the broader proteome.3,4 AZD9291, in particular, accumulates in the lysosome, which may account for off-target activity with the cysteine-dependent cathepsin proteases.4

In an attempt to improve the selectivity of AZD9291, we modified key groups in the structure of the compound and evaluated the proteomic reactivity of the analogues in NSCLC cells expressing T790M-EGFR. Our goal was to identify hot spots for further refinement of the compound. While other groups have studied the impact of changing the reactive group on the AZD9291 scaffold,5 we chose to retain the same Michael acceptor and instead modify other sites. Based on AstraZeneca’s studies on T790M-EGFR inhibitors that led to the discovery of AZD9291,6 as well as the propensity of compounds with basic amines to accumulate in the lysosome (the organelle that harbors a major set of cathepsin off-targets of AZD9291), we decided to explore the consequences of modifying the diamino group, as well as other groups on the compound (the methoxy and methylindole moieties) (Fig. 1). The pyrimidine group is essential for binding to T790M-EGFR so we chose to keep this region intact, along with the acrylamide responsible for covalent interaction with C797 in the EGFR active site.

Results and Discussion

Analogs with 1-methylindole or 1-H indole as R1 were obtained by reaction of either a 1-methylindole or 1-H indole with 2,4-dichloropyrimidine. The former was introduced by a Friedel-Craft reaction using aluminum trichloride whereas the latter was introduced by an SNAr reaction of the indole, deprotonated with methyl magnesium bromide, on the 4-position of the 2,4-dichloropyrimidine. The second chlorine was then substituted by various nitroanilines bearing either a hydrogen or a methoxy group as R2 and either a hydrogen or a fluorine in the 4 position. In the latter case, the fluorine was substituted by different amines as R3 groups. The nitro group was reduced into an amine, using hydrogen and palladium on carbon or iron powder and ammonium chloride, in order to introduce the Michael acceptor moiety (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Synthetic route for the variation of R1, R2 and R3.

The introduction of the acrylamide group in the final step proved to be more tedious than expected for some of the analogs. With only one equivalent of acryloyl chloride, the reaction was incomplete and the starting material and the product could not be separated (Fig. 3a) . The use of a slight excess of acryloyl chloride lead to a mixture of product and a by-product bearing 2 acrylamide groups, also non-separable (Fig. 3b). The use of acrylic acid and a coupling agent, T3P, gave the product with non-separable impurities. The same issue occurred when using acrylic acid and triphenylphosphite (Fig. 3c). To avoid the formation of the bis-acrylamide compound, the synthesis route was modified to protect the secondary amine with a Boc group. However, during the deprotection of the Boc group, the acrylamide was partially cleaved leading to a mixture of products that were not separable (Fig. 3d). We also used tert-butyl acrylate and ethyl acrylate in an attempt to achieve selective introduction on the primary amine, but no reaction was observed (Fig. 3e) . We then decided to use 2 equivalents of acryloyl chloride to introduce the acrylamide and hydrolyze the acrylamide on the guanidine-like nitrogen. Several acidic conditions were tested and a solution of HCl 3M in AcOEt was determined to be optimal, despite the formation of another by-product resulting from the addition of a chlorine on the Michael acceptor. After elimination of the chlorine with triethylamine in acetonitrile, the final compounds were obtained (Fig. 3f) .

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Different strategies attempted to introduce the acrylamide.

Using this synthetic route, the following compounds were obtained (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Library of biologically tested compounds.

The in situ activity of the various analogs was evaluated using the NSCLC lung cancer line H1975, which harbors a T790M-EGFR variant, by competitive activity-based protein profiling (ABPP).3 Cells were first treated with an inhibitor analog or DMSO vehicle (1 and 10 μM). After 2 h, the cells were treated with the alkyne-bearing AZD9291 probe (Fig. 5). After 4 h, cells were lysed, and membrane and soluble proteomes isolated and subject to treatment with rhodamine-azide by copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition,7 as described previously.4 Probe-labeled proteins were then separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized by in-gel fluorescence scanning (Fig. 6). In this competitive ABPP experiment, a compound is considered inhibitory against T790M-EGFR or off-targets if it blocks the AZD9291 probe labeling of these proteins at 1 or 10 μM test concentrations (reflected in a loss of in-gel fluorescence signal for these proteins).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Structure of AZD9291 probe and Rhodamine azide for competitive activity-based protein profiling of AZD9291 analogs.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Gel-based competitive activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) of analogs of AZD9291. H1975 cells were treated at indicated concentrations of inhibitor (AZ = AZD9291) or DMSO vehicle (2 h) prior to incubation with the alkyne AZD9291 probe (1 μM, 4 h). Cells were then lysed and their membrane and soluble proteomes subject to Cu(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition with rhodamine-azide, SDS-PAGE, and in-gel fluorescence analysis.

These studies demonstrated that replacing the diamino group with other basic amines had variable impact on EGFR and cathepsin reactivity, but did not furnish analogues with superior selectivity. In contrast, an analogue where the diamino group was removed along with removal of the N-methyl of the indole unit (EB037) maintained T790M-EGFR engagement at 1 and 10 μM while showing reduced reactivity with cathepsins. In contrast, analogue EB017, which also lacked the diamino group, but maintained the N-methyl indole lost interactions with both EGFR and cathepsins. We should also note that other off-targets of AZD9291 were retained with EB037 (e.g., ~100 kDa soluble protein).

Conclusion

In summary, this study revealed that modification of the AZD9291 scaffold can reduce off-targets of the parent compound, while maintaining reactivity with T790M-EGFR. In particular, our findings indicate that the basic amine in AZD9291 is not required for engagement of T790M-EGFR and replacement of this group with suitable neutral analogues may yield compounds with lower propensity to enter the lysosome and cross-react with cathepsins. Further work is required to identify compounds with optimal selectivity for T790M-EGFR over cathepsins, as well as to further improve selectivity against other off-targets in the proteome. Work continues to develop next generation covalent inhibitors against T790M EGFR with reduced off-target reactivity and to explore the lysosomotropic properties of the new compounds using established assays.8 .

Supplementary Material

1

Highlights:

  • Off-target activity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor AZD9291.

  • Chemical proteomic analysis of AZD9291 analogues.

  • Reduction of off-target activity with retention of T790M-EGFR inhibition.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Kwang-Hwa Foundation and the National Institutes of Health (CA231991).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Declaration of Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing final interests.

References

  • 1.Finlay MRV, Anderton M, Ashton S, Ballard P, Bethel PA, Box MR, Bradbury RH, Brown SJ, Butterworth S, Campbell A, Chorley C, Colclough N, Cross DAE, Currie GS, Grist M, Hassall L, Hill GB, James D, James M, Kemmitt P, Klinowska T, Lamont G, Lamont SG, Martin N, McFarland HL, Mellor MJ, Orme JP, Perkins D, Perkins P, Richmond G, Smith P, Ward RA, Waring MJ, Whittaker D, Wells S, Wrigley GL. J Med Chem. 2014; 57: 8249–8267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sullivan I, Planchard D. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2016; 10: 549–565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lanning BR, Whitby LR, Dix MM, Douhan J, Gilbert AM, Hett EC, Johnson TO, Joslyn C, Kath JC, Niessen S, Roberts LR, Schnute ME, Wang C, Hulce JJ, Wei B, Whiteley LO, Hayward MM, Cravatt BF. Nat Chem Biol. 2014; 10: 760–767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Niessen S, Dix MM, Barbas S, Potter ZE, Lu S, Brodsky O, Planken S, Behenna D, Almaden C, Gajiwala KS, Ryan K, Ferre R, Lazear MR, Hayward MM, Kath JC, Cravatt BF. Cell Chemical Biology. 2017; 24: 1388–1400.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sato M, Fuchida H, Shindo N, Kuwata K, Tokunaga K, Xiao-Lin G, Inamori R, Hosokawa K, Watari K, Shibata T, Matsunaga N, Koyanagi S, Ohdo S, Ono M, Ojida A. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2020; 11: 1137–1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ward RA, Anderton MJ, Ashton S, Bethel PA, Box M, Butterworth S, Colclough N, Chorley CG, Chuaqui C, Cross DAE, Dakin LA, Debreczeni JÉ, Eberlein C, Finlay MRV, Hill GB, Grist M, Klinowska TCM, Lane C, Martin S, Orme JP, Smith P, Wang F, Waring MJ. J Med Chem. 2013; 56: 7025–7048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB. Angewandte Chemie. 2002; 114: 2708–2711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nadanaciva S, Lu S, Gebhard DF, Jessen BA, Pennie WD, Will Y. Toxicol In Vitro. 2011; 25: 715–723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES