Skip to main content
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
. 2021 Aug 13;52(4):2091–2096. doi: 10.1007/s42770-021-00587-z

Genetic characterization of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in Greece

Theodoros Karampatakis 1,, Panagiotis Papadopoulos 2, Katerina Tsergouli 1, Apostolos S Angelidis 3, Angeliki Melidou 1, Daniel Sergelidis 2, Anna Papa 1
PMCID: PMC8578364  PMID: 34387854

Abstract

The interest in livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) strains is increasing due to their wide distribution and transmission even in persons without previous contact with livestock, and these strains pose a public health threat. The aim of the study was the genetic characterization of the whole genome of two epidemiologically unrelated t034 LA-MRSA strains previously isolated from the nasal cavities of a goat and a farmer in Greece. Both strains were assigned to the ST398-Vc-t034 type and they were carrying a single transposon identical to Tn6133. They harbored genes conferring resistance to several antibiotics (aminoglycosides, β-lactams, macrolides, streptogramin B, tetracycline, and trimethoprim), and genes associated with virulence (enterotoxins, γ-hemolysins, and aureolysin). The present study can serve as baseline for further LA-MRSA epidemiological and evolutionary studies in Greece, while awareness and increased surveillance are needed to avoid their spread.

Keywords: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Whole genome sequencing, Resistance genes, Virulence factors


Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) constitutes a severe threat to public health as it causes hospital-acquired (ΗΑ) and community-acquired (CA) infections [1], while a third group, livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA), was identified in the early 2000s when strain exchange was observed between pigs and farmers in France and the Netherlands [2, 3]. Since then, LA-MRSA is often being detected even in patients who had no previous contact with livestock, while nosocomial transmissions of LA-MRSA have been also confirmed [46]. The initially detected predominant sequence types (STs) of LA-MRSA were ST9, ST398, and ST433 [2, 3]. Among them, LA-MRSA ST398 has become a rapidly emerging cause of human infections [7].

In Greece, LA-MRSA was detected in patients with or without prior contact with animals [811]. In a study conducted during November 2016–June 2017 in 40 dairy (cattle, sheep, and goat) farms in northern Greece, S. aureus and MRSA were detected in 47.8% and 4.1% of 387 samples from raw milk, farmers, and livestock, respectively [12]. Two of the MRSA strains originating from that study, isolated in 2017 from the nasal cavity of a 4-year-old goat (G-MRSA) and an asymptomatic cattle farmer (H-MRSA) working in a distantly located cattle farm, were assigned to spa type t034 [12]. Since t034 spa type is strongly associated with LA-MRSA clonal complex (CC) 398 [13], the aim of the present study was to genetically analyze the whole genome sequence of these two isolates focusing on the analysis of antimicrobial resistance genes, virulence factors, and mobile genetic elements. Both isolates were resistant to penicillin, oxacillin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, erythromycin, tetracycline, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and they were biofilm producers and non-typeable by SmaI-PFGE. Both carried the mecA gene and the enterotoxin sec gene, while H-MRSA carried also the sed gene [12].

DNA was extracted from each isolate using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The concentration of double-strand (ds) DNA was measured using Qubit ds DNA HS assay kit (Q32851, Life Technologies). NGS was performed using the Ion Torrent S5 PGM Platform (Life Technologies Corporation, Grand Island, NY, USA). Shearing, purification, ligation, barcoding, size selection, library amplification and quantitation, emulsion PCR, and enrichment were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the products were loaded on a 316 chip. The Ion PGMHi-Q (200) chemistry (Ion PGM Hi-Q Sequencing kit, A25592) was applied. De novo assembly was performed with SPADES version 5. Strain RIVM1295 (accession number CP013616) was used as a reference sequence, while the Tn6133 sequence (accession number FR772051) was used as a reference sequence for the transposon. Identification of MLST, antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes, SCCmec elements, and plasmids was performed applying the tools using MLST 2.0, Resfinder 4.1, KmerResistance 2.2, Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD), VirulenceFinder 2.0, SCCmecFinder 1.2, and PlasmidFinder 2.1 [1419]. Detection and identification of insertion sequences (ISs) were performed using the ISFinder software [20] and the database URL (http://www-is.biotoul.fr). Genome annotation of virulence and pathogenesis genes was performed using the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) v.2.0 server [21].

It was shown that both MRSA isolates belonged to ST398, and the predicted SCCmec type was Vc (5C2&5). Genes conferring resistance to aminoglycosides (ant(9)-Ia), β-lactams (mecA and blaZ), macrolides and streptogramin B (vgaE and ermA), tetracycline (tetK and tetM), and trimethoprim (dfrG) were detected in both isolates (Table 1). The major detected virulence factors were related to adherence, exoenzymes, immune evasion, iron uptake, and toxins and are seen in Table 1, while the characteristics of the intact phages are seen in Table 2. The detected ISs, together with the respective score and e-values, are shown in Table 3. None of the isolates was found to carry PVL gene or any of the human-related immune evasion cluster (IEC) genes (Sa3int, sak, scn, sea, and sep). The two MRSA isolates contained a transposon of 11,475 bp, identical to the transposon Tn6133 identified in the IMD49-10 strain isolated from a pig in Switzerland (accession number FR772051). Both MRSA harbored one plasmid of the rep7a family. The rep gene was 955-nt long and encoded the protein repC (413 aa). The subsystem categories of the virulence and pathogenesis genes of the two strains generated through RAST software are shown in Fig. 1. The whole genome sequences of G-MRSA and H-MRSA were submitted to European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under the study PRJEB39748 and received the accession numbers ERS4944046 and ERS4944047, respectively.

Table 1.

Genetic characteristics of the two MRSA t034 isolates of the study

G-MRSA H-MRSA
Size (bp) 2,121,406 2,817,670
GC content (%) 32.9 32.8
Number of contigs (with PEGs) 1402 328
MLST ST398 ST398
Antimicrobial resistance genes mecA, blaZ, ant(9)-Ia, vgaE, ermA, tetK, tetM, dfrG, czrC mecA, blaZ, ant(9)-Ia vgaE, ermA, tetK, tetM, dfrG, czrC
Efflux pump genes mgrA, mepR, LmrS mgrA, arlR, tet(K), mepR, norA, LmrS
Plasmid rep7a rep7a
Virulence factor (gene)
Adherence
  Collagen binding protein (cna)  +   + 
  Clumping factor (clfA, clfB)  +   + 
  Elastin-binding protein (ebp)  +   + 
  Extracellular adherence protein/MHC analogous protein (map)  +   + 
  Fibronectin binding proteins (fnbA, fnbB)  +   + 
  Intercellular adhesion proteins (icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD, icaR)  +   + 
  Ser-Asp rich proteins (sdrC, sdrD, sdrE)  +   + 
Exoenzyme
  Aureolysin (aur)  +   + 
  Staphylocoagulase (coa)  +   + 
  V8 protease (sspA)  +   + 
  von Willebrand factor-binding protein (vWbp)  +   + 
Immune evasion
  Protein A (spa)  +   + 
Iron uptake
  Isd, srt isdA, isdC, isdD, isdE, isdF, isdH, srtB isdA, isdB, isdC, isdD, isdE, isdF, isdH, srtB
Toxins
  γ-Hemolysin (hlgA, hlgB, hlgC)  +   + 
  Staphylococcal enterotoxins (sea, seb, sec, sec, sed, see, she, selk, selq) sec sec, sed

Table 2.

Intact prophage regions in the two MRSA isolates of the study

Strain Intact phages Length (kb) GC (%) CDS
H-MRSA PHAGE_Staphy_YMC/09/04/R1988_NC_022758(19) 30.2 33.71 37
PHAGE_Staphy_55_NC_007060(13) 24 36.60 31
G-MRSA PHAGE_Staphy_phi2958PVL_NC_011344(15) 17.7 33.11 33

Table 3.

Insertion sequences in G-MRSA and H-MRSA isolates of the study

Sequences producing significant alignments IS family Group Origin Score (bits) E-value
ISSau3 IS1182 S. aureus 3130 0.0
ISSau8 ISL3 S. aureus 2615 0.0
ISSau2 IS3 IS150 S. aureus 2016 0.0
ISSau1 IS30 S. aureus 1853 0.0
IS431mec IS6 S. aureus 1542 0.0
IS431R IS6 S. aureus 1530 0.0
IS257R2 IS6 S. aureus 1524 0.0
IS257R1 IS6 S. aureus 1511 0.0
IS431L IS6 S. aureus 1497 0.0
IS257-3 IS6 S. aureus 1366 0.0
IS257-1 IS6 S. aureus 1346 0.0
IS257-2 IS6 S. aureus 791 0.0
ISSep1 IS1182 S. epidermidis 722 0.0

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Subsystem categories of the virulence and pathogenesis genes of A H-MRSA and B G-MRSA generated through RAST software

Although the isolates were derived from different farms, with no evidence of epidemiological link, they were similar, differing only in the phage composition and few virulence factors. They belonged to ST398, a fact that explained their non-typeability by SmaI-PFGE due to DNA methylation which occurs in ST398 isolates including those of type t034 [22]. ST398 is considered the most prevalent livestock-associated ST in Europe [23]. There are reports of CC398 MRSA strains in Greece from patients [11, 24], but the present study reports the first WGS of LA-MRSA CC398 in livestock (goat) in Greece and a farmer working in close contact with cattle. Both G- and H-MRSA isolates harbored the SCCmec type Vc (5C2&5) element. The vast majority of LA-MRSA strains (including CC398 LA-MRSA) carry this specific type, which contains genes related to the detoxification of heavy metals, such as cadmium (cadmium zinc resistance C, czrC) and copper (copA) [25, 26]. It has to be mentioned that copper is routinely used as a growth enhancer in farming [27, 28], while the presence of copper resistance genes contributes to bacterial survival [29].

The two MRSA isolates carried a large variety of antimicrobial resistance genes which have been previously detected in ST398 LA-MRSA strains [26, 3032]. It has been shown that isolates carrying the Vc(5C2&5) element co-harbor tet(K) in a higher proportion than isolates with other SCCmec elements [33].

Βoth G- and H-MRSA isolates carried the enterotoxin sec gene, and H-MRSA carried also the sed gene; however, they lacked scn, chp, and sak, as is the case for LA-MRSA [34], while aur gene has been reported in LA-methicillin-susceptible S. aureus ST398 strains [35]. The detection of hlgA, hlgB, and hlgC genes has been associated with human and livestock carriage [36, 37]. PVL and human-related IEC genes were not detected in the two isolates of the study, which is in accordance with other studies that reported that the majority of ST398 LA-MRSA strains lack major virulence factors, such as PVL, exfoliative toxins, and TSST-1 [38]. Subsequently, both isolates lacked the bacteriophage ΦSa3 containing the IEC genes, as previously described in ST398 LA-MRSA strains [39].

Several ISs were detected in the two isolates, most of them belonging to the IS6 family, while ISSau2 of the IS3 family was identified in LA-MRSA ST398 [40]. Furthermore, IS257 and IS431 elements detected in both strains have been previously reported in LA-MRSA strains [41, 42].

Both MRSA isolates carried a Tn6133 transposon as previously described in a human MRSA ST398 strain in Greece [43]. Similarly, LA-MRSA ST398-t034 strains carrying the Tn6133 transposon have been isolated from cattle and poultry in Germany [44].

LA-MRSA is prevalent in multiple animal species, with pigs being the predominant host worldwide [45]. Recently, it was shown that farmed mink in Denmark constitute a reservoir of MRSA CC398 posing a potential exposure risk to numerous mink farm workers, and it was demonstrated that pigs were the source of LA-MRSA CC398 in mink feed, mink, and mink farmers [46].

There is an ongoing evolution of LA-MRSA strains, as they can acquire antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors from other bacteria [47]. The only way to gain a better insight into their genetic characterization is through WGS. The present study provides a first insight into the genetic characterization of two LA-MRSA isolated in Greece and can serve as basis for future studies. Since LA-MRSA carriage represents mainly an occupational risk, awareness, infection control measures, and implementation of high hygiene standards in farms are critical to eliminating the spread of these strains in the community and the nosocomial settings. Further studies are needed to identify the prevalence of LA-MRSA in humans and livestock in Greece.

Author contribution

All the authors have contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results, and to the writing of the manuscript.

Funding

The current work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 grant VEO (grant number 874735).

Availability of data and material

The whole genome sequences of G-MRSA and H-MRSA were submitted to European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under the study PRJEB39748 and received the accession numbers ERS4944046 and ERS4944047, respectively.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was not required as both isolates were obtained from previously published studies.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Mediavilla JR, et al. Global epidemiology of community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) Curr Opin Microbiol. 2012;15(5):588–595. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2012.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Voss A, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(12):1965–1966. doi: 10.3201/eid1112.050428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Armand-Lefevre L, Ruimy R, Andremont A. Clonal comparison of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from healthy pig farmers, human controls, and pigs. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(5):711–714. doi: 10.3201/eid1105.040866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mascaro V, et al. Prevalence of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) among farm and slaughterhouse workers in Italy. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60(8):e416–e425. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bosch T et al (2016) Changing characteristics of livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from humans - emergence of a subclade transmitted without livestock exposure, the Netherlands, 2003 to 2014. Euro Surveill 21(21) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Bosch T, et al. Next-generation sequencing confirms presumed nosocomial transmission of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(14):4081–4089. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00773-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Price LB et al (2012) Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. mBio 3(1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Sarrou S, et al. Dissemination of methicillin-susceptible CC398 Staphylococcus aureus strains in a rural Greek area. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0122761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kinross P et al (2017) Livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among human MRSA isolates, European Union/European Economic Area countries, 2013. Euro Surveill 22(44). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Hetem DJ, et al. Molecular epidemiology of MRSA in 13 ICUs from eight European countries. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(1):45–52. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Drougka E, et al. Interspecies spread of Staphylococcus aureus clones among companion animals and human close contacts in a veterinary teaching hospital. A cross-sectional study in Greece. Prev Vet Med. 2016;126:190–8. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Papadopoulos P, et al. Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S.aureus (MRSA) in bulk tank milk, livestock and dairy-farm personnel in north-central and north-eastern Greece: Prevalence, characterization and genetic relatedness. Food Microbiol. 2019;84:103249. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.103249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stegger M, et al. Rapid differentiation between livestock-associated and livestock-independent Staphylococcus aureus CC398 clades. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Larsen MV, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Camacho C, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Joensen KG, et al. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(5):1501–1510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03617-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Carattoli A, et al. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(7):3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alcock BP, et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D517–D525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Clausen P, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. Rapid and precise alignment of raw reads against redundant databases with KMA. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2336-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Siguier P, et al. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D32–6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brettin T, et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8365. doi: 10.1038/srep08365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wulf M, Voss A. MRSA in livestock animals-an epidemic waiting to happen? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14(6):519–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01970.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cuny C, Kock R, Witte W. Livestock associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) and its relevance for humans in Germany. Int J Med Microbiol. 2013;303(6–7):331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sarrou S, et al. Characterization of a novel lsa(E)- and lnu(B)-carrying structure located in the chromosome of a Staphylococcus aureus Sequence Type 398 Strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(2):1164–1166. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01178-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Deurenberg RH, et al. The molecular evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13(3):222–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schwendener S, Perreten V. New transposon Tn6133 in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 contains vga(E), a novel streptogramin A, pleuromutilin, and lincosamide resistance gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(10):4900–4904. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00528-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cavaco LM, et al. Cloning and occurrence of czrC, a gene conferring cadmium and zinc resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(9):3605–3608. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00058-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hasman H, Aarestrup FM. tcrB, a gene conferring transferable copper resistance in Enterococcus faecium: occurrence, transferability, and linkage to macrolide and glycopeptide resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(5):1410–1416. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.5.1410-1416.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schijffelen MJ, et al. Whole genome analysis of a livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolate from a case of human endocarditis. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:376. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kadlec K, et al. Novel and uncommon antimicrobial resistance genes in livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(8):745–755. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03842.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McCarthy AJ, Lindsay JA. The distribution of plasmids that carry virulence and resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus is lineage associated. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wettstein Rosenkranz K, et al. Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among Swiss veterinary health care providers: detection of livestock- and healthcare-associated clones. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2014;156(7):317–325. doi: 10.1024/0036-7281/a000601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Larsen J, et al. Copresence of tet(K) and tet(M) in livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398 is associated with increased fitness during exposure to sublethal concentrations of tetracycline. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(7):4401–4403. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00426-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cuny C, et al. Prevalence of the immune evasion gene cluster in Staphylococcus aureus CC398. Vet Microbiol. 2015;177(1–2):219–223. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Benito D, et al. Detection of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398 and ST133 strains in gut microbiota of healthy humans in Spain. Microb Ecol. 2013;66(1):105–111. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0240-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shukla SK, et al. Virulence genes and genotypic associations in nasal carriage, community-associated methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant USA400 Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(10):3582–3592. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00657-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Peacock SJ, et al. Virulent combinations of adhesin and toxin genes in natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2002;70(9):4987–4996. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.9.4987-4996.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Monecke S, et al. A field guide to pandemic, epidemic and sporadic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e17936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mama OM, et al. High prevalence of multidrug resistant S.aureus-CC398 and frequent detection of enterotoxin genes among non-CC398 S.aureus from pig-derived food in Spain. Int J Food Microbiol. 2020;320:108510. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang L, et al. Characterization of insertion sequence ISSau2 in the human and livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fessler AT, et al. Complete sequence of a plasmid from a bovine methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring a novel ica-like gene cluster in addition to antimicrobial and heavy metal resistance genes. Vet Microbiol. 2017;200:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tuchscherr LP, et al. Characterization of a new variant of IS257 that has displaced the capsule genes within bovine isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2007;75(11):5483–5488. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00747-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sarrou S et al (2018) MLSB-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in central Greece: rate of resistance and molecular characterization. Microb Drug Resist [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 44.Hauschild T, et al. Detection of the novel vga(E) gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 isolates from cattle and poultry. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(2):503–504. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Petinaki E, Spiliopoulou I. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among companion and food-chain animals: impact of human contacts. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(7):626–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03881.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hansen JE, et al. Spread of LA-MRSA CC398 in Danish mink (Neovison vison) and mink farm workers. Vet Microbiol. 2020;245:108705. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lakhundi S, Zhang K (2018) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 31(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The whole genome sequences of G-MRSA and H-MRSA were submitted to European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under the study PRJEB39748 and received the accession numbers ERS4944046 and ERS4944047, respectively.


Articles from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Microbiology

RESOURCES